Tuesday 19th August 2025
Blog Page 1184

OUSU for free Wednesday afternoons

0

A motion was passed by the OUSU Council’s 5th Week meeting on Wednesday 27th May in favour of setting aside time on Wednesday afternoons for students to pursue extra-curricular activities.

The policy was proposed by Louis Trup and called for Wednesday afternoons to remain free from any mandatory course commitments.

This would allow students “the opportunity to take part in extra-curricular activities”. The motion proposed that these might include taught and research courses.

The motion began by mentioning OUSU’s previous adoption of this policy, “OUSU once had policy in support of having Wednesday afternoons free for course commitments for students”.

This referenced OUSU’s last affiliation with the idea of free Wednesday afternoons which ended in Michaelmas of 2003. This was because the motion lapsed when no one campaigned in favour of it.

Louis Trup, OUSU President and proposer of the policy, told Cherwell, “I’m proud to be bringing this motion alongside the legend that is Hector Bagley. Wednesday afternoons are free in other universities, and it certainly enhances the student experience.

“It allows for more people to get involved with extra-curricular activities like sport, which I believe can only be a good thing. That is why I think it should be OUSU policy.”

During the meeting he also defended his motion, saying it would “give us more choice”. He also said that students shouldn’t be forced into doing things by timetabling, concluding that “it’s a start to bringing about change”.

OUSU’s return to this policy was sparked by a meeting between the President and the University’s Sports Strategic Sub-Committee, where the issue was raised.

Wednesday was suggested as suitable because it is the day many national universities choose to allow students time to pursue extra-curricular activities.

It is also the day that the majority British Universities and Colleges Sport (BUCS) league matches take place in many sports.

When asked whether he thought he was representing students’ wishes, Trup responded by citing OUSU’s role as representing students. The agenda for the meeting concedes, “as OUSU has no policy on this, OUSU’s representative, Louis trup, could only speculate as to what students want”.

First-year English and French student Emma Millington commented, “The idea of having delegated time where you’re not working is quite radical and could benefit students’ physical and mental health. I have two and half hours of French class on Wednesdays when I would like to go to our college’s Zumba class.”

However, she highlighted how the motion may be short sighted in its understanding of the logistics behind the way the university creates its timetables.

She said, “If the class wasn’t in the evening it would clash with some English contact hours.”

This debate comes in the wake of calls for a reading week, which so far have remained unanswered. 

Bouncer accused of aggression at Warehouse

0

Bouncers have been accused of using unnecessary force against a student, as well as criticised for their handling of those involved in the incident following the Unity Bop at Warehouse nightclub on Saturday 23rd May.

A first year at Pembroke sustained significant facial injuries when he was removed from Warehouse, sparking concern over bouncers’ conduct.

Students present were also unhappy with the way the bouncers communicated with them and the police officers on the scene.

The Unity Bop ended the joint equalities week across Pembroke, Corpus Christi, Exeter and Trinity colleges.

The student told Cherwell, “I was on the dance floor with a friend when I jokingly pushed him. Thinking that I was trying to initiate a fight, the bouncer came from behind and put my hands behind my back to escort me out of the club. Even though my friend and I tried to tell him that he was mistaken, he didn’t listen and proceeded to throw me out in an extremely aggressive man- ner. He didn’t bother to wait for the doorman to fully open the door and rammed my face into the edge of door due to which I got a massive cut on my lip and broke half my front tooth.

“This is all extremely frustrating as all of this could’ve been avoided if the bouncer spared ten seconds to hear us out rather [than] chucking me out with unnecessary aggression and causing permanent damage to my face in the process.”

After explaining how the pushes exchanged were “obviously a joke”, the other fresher involved in the incident commented, “The bouncers were very unreasonable! The ones that took the student out said nothing and the others were acting as though there was nothing wrong, as- suming the problem was that he was ‘drunk’. Comparatively the police were very good, consulting everyone outside.” 

The police report from the incident stated, “Enquiries were made and CCTV footage was viewed,” but that eventually “no offence was found to have taken place” and that it appeared the student concerned “had injured himself on a door”.

However Yew Loong, also a first-year at Pembroke and eye witness, fervently disagreed with this conclusion.

He told Cherwell, “I first saw a bouncer suddenly and violently grab the student by the side, restraining his arms and pulling him away from a group of other Pembroke students. He was not retaliating or protesting and merely asked what he was being pulled out for. The first bouncer did not give any justification for his actions and instead, another bouncer came and again violently grabbed him from the other side. I followed behind him, whilst calling out to the bouncers that he was not violent and that it was a misunderstanding.

“The bouncers took no heed and continued dragging him out of the club as quickly as possible whilst restraining him very tightly. Once they reached the door, they did not slow down or loosen their grip on him. He managed to get through the first door without injury, but upon reaching the second door, he was clearly not ready to go to through it. The bouncers’ action would almost certainly cause injury and using force that was not warranted especially considering that the student did not retaliate when the first bouncer grabbed him.”

Fresher Niamh Coote commented, “When I questioned one of the bouncers about the CCTV coverage of the area to assess the situation, another bouncer approached me and started asking me lots of quite rude questions such as whether the friend was my boyfriend because he couldn’t understand why I was ‘emotionally down’ about the situation.

“He accused me of ‘fabricating’ the situation and accused another friend from College of punching the guy in the face. The bouncer made me feel very uncomfortable with his questioning until eventually we decided to ‘agree to disagree’ and some friends and I walked home. We spoke to another police officer about the situation as we didn’t feel it had been handled well at all and we were not left with much confidence that our friend was being treated fairly.”

With regards to the bouncers’ dealings with the Police, Livvy Iller, a first-year Biochemist, told Cherwell, “Two police men walking by saw there had been an incident and walked over. Immediately the ‘head’ bouncer greeted one of them by name, shook his hand, and started chatting away about how they had shared a stint on the force together.

“It was a shameless and blatant attempt to win over the police so that the report would be marked as a classic incident of drunken youths getting out of hand and being rowdy, rather than an aggressive, unwarranted attack resulting in a serious injury by one of the bouncers.”

Bethanie Curry, one of the organisers of Unity week as JCR President at Corpus Christi, commented, “The behaviour of the security staff in this instance was completely unacceptable. There is never a good reason to treat club-goers in this way. I am especially sad since the event was meant to be celebrating the end of a week of solidarity and liberation: it was an event that was meant to be enjoyed by everyone. I am deeply saddened to hear otherwise”.

Thames Valley Police declined to comment on the allegations of a “shameless” attempt to win them over, stating, “We regret that Thames Valley Police is unable to respond to complaints and concerns regarding quality of service received by the police through the media.

“We take all complaints seriously and require complaints to be made through official channels so that the details and unique circumstances of the individual’s case can be taken into consideration and investigated by our Professional Standards Department.”

Warehouse also declined to comment. 

Review: Clouds of Sils Maria

0

★★★★★
Five stars

Across a beautiful vista, we’re invited to stare upon the wonder of the Swiss Alps. We watch expectantly as clouds idle by across the gleaming peaks. Gradually, they begin to coalesce into a new form, winding, snaking into a stream that runs through the crests of the mountains. It’s majestic. And then it dissipates, its wispy matter dispersing into new, unknowable forms. This is the Maloja Snake, a beautiful geographical phenomena, and the central metaphor of the Clouds of Sils Maria. The film is about the nature of time, expectation and uncertainty, expressed beautifully in the Maloja Snake, a brief moment where humans can ascribe meaning and definition to a ceaseless natural process.

The cycle of life colour the film from the off. Following the death of one of her former directors, Juliette Binoche’s french film star, Maria Enders, is asked to consider preforming in a revival of the play, also titled the Maloja Snake, which ignited her career decades ago. But now, rather than playing the hopeful, conniving ingenue, she will play the older woman who is driven to suicide by her charms. Taking the job, she retreats to an alpine house with her personal assistant, played by Kristen Stewart in tow, so as to begin rehearsal. And so the stage is set for seduction – that of ingenue and elder, servant and master, performer and audience, art and critic.

The relationship of these two woman becomes the film’s driving force. Binoche and Stewart spar magnificently, living, breathing and responding on screen. It’s no surprise that Stewart won France’s prestigious Caesar Award for her role – the first american actor to ever do so. Their beguiling performances are aided by Olivier Assayas’ deft screenplay and direction. He begins new scenes mid rehearsal, leaving us unsure as to where the characters begin and their performers end, whether what is being expressed belongs to actor or character. It seems to be a little of both. Assays’ obsessive interest in these women, and indeed the project’s genesis with Binoche as his muse, never make for an uncomfortable or leering film. His interests are cerebral, and the women’s relationship is intelligent and intellectual, a fascination of the mind rather than the body.

Of course the film operates on a meta level too, with Binoche essentially starring as herself – the queen of European cinema – whilst Stewart is granted the opportunity to defend the blockbusters that Binoche’s famous young costar regularly appears in. And Chloe Grace Moretz plays supporting as a wild child tabloid starlet looking for a credible role. A debate between two styles of acting emerges. Is Binoche’s character’s more theatrical, trained method outmoded by her Moretz’s charachter’s emotive, untamed style? Her assistant seems to think so, and so Ender’s need for admiration turns to jealousy. It’s a debate that Stewart’s presence provokes too, with her unique ability to experience authentic emotion on screen. The actors lose themselves in the roles, but at the same time Assayas slyly evokes their public personas. It’s a testament to the skill of all involved that the narrative remains entirely compelling. The film merges all boundaries of character and actor, and invites us to wonder at the alchemy of performance itself.

Can Enders truly stop herself from becoming out of touch? Or is this inevitable, even as in many ways she sees herself as still believing in and identifying with the ingenue’s youthful spirit. Assayas toys with these ideas of expectation and constriction, playing the vastness of the story’s surroundings against the claustrophobia of the intimate interior scenes. He evokes theatrical staging in the way the characters arrange themselves in public spaces – hotel lobbies, restaurants and parties – and in the formal compositions which place his human cast before backdrops of colossal rock formations, constraining both inside a rigid aspect ratio.

The narrative also concerns itself with the nature of modern fame, examining celebrity and their lives-as-performance that play out in gossip magazines, televisions and all manner of pocket sized devices. As Binoche examines her costars’ various mugshots in the pixellated glow of her iPad, we see someone entirely different from the shrewd, cultured young woman who later arrives on the cinema screen. Though the film’s third act loses a little momentum, and hits the occasional false note (jarring only for their complete absence to that point), it’s easily, instantly forgiven. Assayas has crafted a dense, cerebral, engrossing film.

Long after it ends, Clouds of Sils Maria will twist, turn and writhe around in the mind, taking new forms, and revealing new wonders. It’s a film as sublime as the clouds and mountains from which it takes its name.

Will’s Deli is deli-cious!

0

I finally decided that it was about time for me to venture into the establishment whose aroma wafts down the Woodstock Road every day, making my commute to and from lectures ever so slightly more pleasant. After reading some Voltaire in the library, I headed to the deli in the sunshine, smug in the knowledge that today was the day I would actually consume its produce. As I approached, I saw a gathering of people assembled outside and wondered what they were doing before realising that this was in fact the queue spilling out onto the street. Definitely a good sign. The last two people in the queue were two of my friends who’d had the same idea as me; now I had more than just Voltaire for company.

Personally, I’m a fan of the veggie-friendly, charming and relaxed hippie vibes from the atmosphere and the staff. We even tactically chose which table to make a beeline for with smiles on our faces. I went for the chicken fricassé with rice, green veg and a sprinkling of seeds whilst both of my friends went for various salad combos. I was envious of my friends’ salads as we dug in, but they quickly found the colossal portions too much and offered me some of the best olives I’ve ever had.

It’s a real shame that there isn’t much light inside, as there are only the large windows at the front letting in any natural light and the seating goes quite far back from the street. However, I’m definitely happy to let that one slide because instead of light, shelves of funky products for sale like Oxford Sauce and Nicaraguan coffee surround you. Oxford Sauce is essentially a spicier version of ketchup and the bottle itself is enough justification to buy it. These products, paired with the William Morris design trays to put your plate on, are more than enough to satisfy a student like me who was merely there to eat some good food.

A generous helping of freshly prepared food and a bottle of elderflower drink set me back just under £9, which I feel was totally worth it. I left Will’s Deli with a grateful belly, a loyalty card and the knowledge that it’s the kind of place where I could eat alone or bump into friends. No doubt I’ll be back very soon.

Top 5 songs to make you enjoy subfusc even more

0

The ‘Save Subfusc’ Campaign paid off and our ancient tradition is here to stay. You can continue to don your impressive costume to sit your exams in beautiful surroundings, and perhaps the fuss of pinning that fiddly carnation to your lapel might even distract you from the three hours looming ahead.

1. ‘Back To Black’ – Amy Winehouse

For a terrifying moment, you thought subfusc might be gone, but no, Oxford has gone back to black.

2. ‘Goldfinger’ – Shirley Bassey

Don’t act like you haven’t pretended you were James Bond while wearing subfusc.

3. ‘Suit and Tie’ – Justin Timberlake

“As long as I got my suit and (bow)tie”.

4. ‘Carnation’ – Oasis

Oasis might see carnations as depressing, but you’ll love red carnations for the rest of your life.

5. ‘Feeling Good’ – Nina Simone

This song sums up exactly how you feel in subfusc. The combination of the two can make you invincible.

Picks of the Week TT15 Week 6

0

Burning Down the House – Wednesday, 10pm Cellar

Yes, we’ve all been before. Yes, we’ve plugged it a million times. But Bowie doesn’t get old (although that may just be Botox…) and neither does the 80s. 

Punk Rock – Monday – Thursday, 7:30pm, Simpkins Lee Theatre, Lady Margaret Hall

Sixth Form. A Levels. Girls. Bullying. Punk Rock covers all these things, and ends in a “terrify- ing dystopia of vengeful destruction”. Sweet. 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%11884%%[/mm-hide-text]

Ruskin Exhibition Private View – Friday, 6pm, Ruskin School of Drawing and Fine Art

Two weeks before the finalist show comes the first year exhibition at Ruskin. Expect a profusion of conceptual art and (possibly) free refreshments. 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%11883%%[/mm-hide-text]

Zennor – Wednesday – Friday, 8pm North, Wall Arts Centre

The first student show to be performed at the North Wall in Summertown, this play set in a secluded Cornish town promises to bring some- thing fresh to the Oxford theatre scene. 

Milestones: Dancing in the Street

Cast your minds back to the shadowy depths of 1985. Banks are booming: profits are almost as high as cocaine use in the city. The Smiths are busy touring their latest funeral dirge/album. Dire Straits are playing yet more guitar solos upon solos. In the midst of this quagmire comes forth a collaboration of legendary tour de force. After immense success, Mick Jagger and David Bowie are finally working together on a charity single for Live Aid. Musical publications wait with bated breath as the long hours pass before the track’s release, pens at hand to proclaim the new musical messiah. And then their cover of motown staple ‘Dancing in the Street’ drops. Everyone’s jaws hit the floor.

It could have been a brilliant exploit. After all, these men had penned some of the most successful albums of the 1970s and 80s. But for some reason what we end up being presented with is a cover which lacks any originality. Originally recorded by Martha Reeves and the Vandellas and co-written by Marvin Gaye in 1964, the toe-tapping track not only got people moving on dancefloors but brought people out into the streets in protest, becoming a civil rights anthem. The song is regarded by many as the precursor to disco. Mick Jagger even lifted a line to use in his own protest song, ‘Street Fighting Man’ (1968).

But that’s probably where Jagger’s interference with the song should have stopped. The performance isn’t offensive. The warbles and tones of both Bowie and Jagger that grace so many hit songs are all accounted for and in the track in trademark form. It just isn’t very original. Opposed to covering new ground, they merely tread upon the same territory, just without the soulful force of Martha Reeves’ lead vocals to power the track forward.

Van Halen’s 1982 cover at least drowned the original with lashings of excessive guitar licks. But what Jagger and Bowie add to the song is a beautiful visual montage. If you’re not hypnotised by Jagger’s swinging hips, you’re sure to swoon at Bowie’s jumpsuit which would probably look more at home on Bianca Jagger. The viewer is led by the hand through an intoxicating set comprising a disused industrial park, as the couple “dance in the street”: a pun which is lost if you don’t watch carefully or take a swig too much of the product-placed drinks can as Mick does.

But for some reason, the British public always seem to have loved the track and its video that defines what not to wear. The single reached number one in the UK, and continues to be popular: the Jagger/Bowie version was voted the most played song at street parties to celebrate the royal wedding in 2011. It appears there is little hope for popular musical taste in the UK, either past or present. 

In Defence of: The Holiday

0

Now, hear me out. I’m not for a second going to pretend that The Holiday is a great piece of cinema – it isn’t – but I can’t deny falling victim to its uncompromising, irrepressible, mushy charm every Christmas when it’s reeled off on loop on ITV2. I suppose it’s what one might call a “guilty pleasure”.

Nancy Meyers is almost single-handedly responsible for bringing feel-good warmth to the world of film over the past 30 years, with such gooey classics as Father of the Bride, The Parent Trap, and Something’s Gotta Give to her name. In The Holiday, it’s more of the same. The world’s most unnaturally good-looking British siblings (Kate Winslet and Jude Law) cross paths with serenely gorgeous Cameron Diaz and – well – Jack Black in a whirlwind “holiday” romance. You certainly can’t argue with the sheer star power going on. There are supporting roles from Rufus Sewell, Edward Burns, and a gratuitous cameo from Dustin Hoffman in a video store. And who could forget then-90-year old Eli Wallach’s uplifting turn as the lonely screenwriter of Hollywood’s Golden Age?

Yes, the dialogue is corny; yes, it’s bursting with clichéd attempts at romantic set-ups – including a meta parody of the “meet cute”; and yes, it has bizarre delusions of snowfall in England (and a ludicrous assumption that we still say “shag”). The set-up of The Holiday is ridiculous – Meyers’ characters seem to oper- ate within an idyllically surreal all-trusting and open-door society when they decide to abandon their lives, cross the Atlantic, and just swap houses on a whim – but there’s something incredibly liberating and carefree about that.

Wouldn’t it be nice if human beings were actually that unguarded, if their doors were that unbolted and if chatting to strangers on the internet held no sinister, perverted chance of danger whatsoever? What a world that would be. 

Preview: Festivals 2015

0

You’ve made it – the days are getting longer, and being free from exams is so close you can almost touch it, so what better way to unwind over your long and productive summer than go on the world’s least hygienic camping trip? That’s right, it’s festival season. So here I am, trying to help you out on choosing the best way to waste around £200 of your student loan.

We’ll start with Reading (28th – 30th August), where you probably lost your festival virginity (and quite possibly your actual virginity too). There’s some decent bands floating about for you to scream along to pretending you’re not far too old to be there. Then again, a lot of the Main Stage just looks like the smaller tents from two years ago (Fidlar, Palma Violets, and Panic! At The Disco). And for those of you being dragged along by mates with a different music taste from you, you can always go see Dope D.O.D. (whoever that is) on the 1Xtra Stage.

Alternatively, you could go to Glastonbury (24th – 28th June), where you’ll still be the wrong age as this will be the first time you’ve seen The Who live. There’s some huge names – Paul Weller, Mary J. Blige, Motörhead – but the burning question is this: can you actually sit through multiple hours of Kanye West tripping off his own ego? Will he play songs or just rant at you that he didn’t win an award? If that tickles your fancy then go for it, I guess.

You could go to Secret Garden Party (23rd – 26th July) and gurn your nut off to bands you’ve never heard of but pretend you love. Or you could not. Your call.

Equally, you could go to Bestival (10th – 13th September) and gurn your nut off to bands you have actually heard of. Again, your call (go for it, your 15 year old self would never forgive you for passing up the chance to see the man himself – Skrillex).

T in the Park (10th -12th July) seem to have just taken acts who are playing everywhere else (The Libertines, The Prodigy, The Wombats, Annie Mac; the list really does go on). So, it’s probably a pretty good call. Then again, you won’t be able to brag to your mates about the really cool act you saw that they’re really jealous of. And actually, that’s the only reason you’re going to a festival anyway, so it’s probably not a good call. I take that back.

The one to go for, then, is the Isle of Wight festival (11th – 14th June). It’s got a little bit of everything. Blur and Fleetwood Mac will sing songs you actually know, you can go crazy to The Prodigy and there’s even a bit of Kodaline for when you need a nap. At the end of the day though, this is all a bit academic anyway as you won’t have a good time anywhere – there’s only one day of British summer and it definitely won’t be while you’re there.

Shuffling on the page: the perils of dance notation

0

Dashes weave between three distinct lines, topped by a flurry of musical notes. Spindly feet stick out left and right, approaching and distancing themselves from the central line around which they are grouped. On closer inspection the little cross- ings begin to resemble forms and one can make out the traces of figures being described by this seemingly random assortment of shapes.

The question of dance notation is one that has plagued the medium for years. How do you record the exact angle at which an arm should be raised? Or in what way can you make sure that a dancer moves their foot on the fifth beat? The accurate translation of a medium reliant not only on movement but also sound onto flat paper seems an impossibility.

The Beauchamp-Feuillet notation method of the Baroque period traced patterns of steps across the dancefloor, with different lines being assigned to different movements. The Romantic period moved towards stick figure representation of tiny dancers moving across the page in a variety of poses that indicated different turns in combination with the timings and musical notes placed above.

With the development of film, means of recording choreography were majorly improved and simplified. Dancers could turn to film recordings as a guide for not only movement but also an understanding of the impulses behind them. Equally, the act of recording these moments made for a highly engaging subject. Who can forget the scene in Funny Face in which Audrey Hepburn, dressed head to toe in perfect black bookish girl ensemble (black polo neck included), gets up to dance an interpretive piece in the centre of a parody French philosopher’s salon. In the film classic The Red Shoes, the drama of the plot is interspersed with beautiful dance sequences that captivate the viewer and offer an alternate narration to the plot.

However, whilst for recording purposes, film has vastly simplified the notation process, one cannot help but feel that the form is insufficient in recording one of the most essential parts of dance: the interaction between body and space. It is not the movements of the person but the relation of this movement to the space in which they are performing, in the same way that words in literature function orally or paint on a canvas visually, that truly distinguishes dance from other media.

The problem of this was confronted in the German director Wim Wenders’ 2012 film Pina, a tribute to the choreographer Pina Bausch, for which the director resorted to filming in 3D. In an interview given at the time, Wenders noted, “Between dance and film…there was always like an invisible wall…[3D offered] a tool for filmmakers that allowed us to actually be in space, to be in the same element as the dancers.” The limited public access to seeing 3D however makes viewing the film in its intended medium difficult.

Dance, as it is, is a process rooted in the body which can only partially be recorded (at least currently) in other media. The notes in the diary of one of Pina Bausch’s dancers, John Griffin, reflects the struggle of recording the timings of breath in the company’s restaging of Wind von West. Griffin writes of notation, “Is it a general impulse for movement? A specific kind of movement initiation? An aspect of the overall shape or dynamic register of the movement?” Dance may be one of the most approachable and popular art forms in terms of viewership but as it stands, an understanding of the pro- cess behind the product remains distant. Until our media evolves to accurately reflect the multiple dimensionality of the medium, an accurate understanding of its formation will remain distant, excluding a greater viewership from an accurate understanding of the form.