Friday, May 23, 2025
Blog Page 1211

Review: The Boy Next Door

0

★★★☆☆

Three Stars

In a moment of lonely vulnerability, Claire – played by Jennifer Lopez – makes a mistake which turns her life into a living nightmare. Struggling to forgive her cheating husband and focusing hard on her job as a Classics teacher, Claire allows herself to be momentarily seduced by her new neighbour and pupil, 19 year old Noah, played by Ryan Guzman. It is not difficult to sympathise with Claire when things begin to spiral out of control; who wouldn’t be seduced by Ryan Guzman, after all? Caring, charming, intelligent and certainly no strain on the eye, Noah is unable to accept that Claire has made a mistake. His obsession with her grows stronger as he first hacks her computer and imposes himself not only in her work life at school but also in every moment of her home-life, both day and night.

The film, starting off as the typical bland contemporary American love affair, shifts its mood. A sense of unease seeps into the narrative as Noah, despite his adolescence, begins to show an aggressive and threatening side. Ryan Guzman displays the shifting tempers and emotions of this seemingly besotted young man spectacularly, cleverly managing to manipulate Claire’s husband, her son and even her colleagues at school with his innocent angel-like smile and switching instantaneously into someone menacingly violent. As Noah begins to realise that Claire will not willingly submit to his charms again, he begins to blackmail her, and plots to destroy every aspect of her life so as to take her by force.

Unsurprisingly, the film has attracted a large audience due to the presence of singer, songwriter and model Jennifer Lopez. Despite her unexpectedly convincing, half-decent acting skills, many people (primarily male) seem to want to watch this film in the hope that they will catch her in some various stage of undress. They will be disappointed. The focus on her face within this film does however make it rather difficult to forget the numerous L’Oreal make-up advertisements of her visage which have, throughout the years, haunted the aisles of Boots. Co-actor Guzman displays a lot of promise and is certainly a figure to keep an eye out for in the future.

For a film which I expected to find truly disastrously bad, it is actually rather difficult to stop watching The Boy Next Door. There is something about it that is both mildly gripping and even, to an extent, quite exciting. Indeed, the most disappointing thing about this film is that it is not really that disappointing. None of the actors are outrageously awful, the script is tolerable and, despite the odd glitch in its levels of believability, the characters are easy enough to warm to. Yet the film’s narrative is a repeat of countless past TV dramas and failed thriller movies in which the psychotic ex-lover obsesses to the periphery of murder. Ultimately it is not hard to predict that it will fall, just like all the others of its kind, into the limbo of films which are neither good nor bad enough to be remembered.

Review: Focus

0

★★★☆☆

Three Stars

Focus sees Will Smith do what he does best. It’s certainly a fun film, in which Smith plays Nicky, a charismatic hustler who takes wannabe con artist Jess (Margot Robbie) under his wing, and teaches her his age-old familial trade.

It’s hard to put your finger on the exact genre of this film, possibly placing it somewhere between comedy, drama and even romance. Yet as ever, films like Focus let you enjoy the theatrical glamour of grifting, and allow you to leave your morality at home.

Nicky is a master of the hustling scene. He runs his crime ring with precision, using complex gadgets to steal everything from purses to identities. His team hit the streets of New Orleans, and Jess is a natural, stealing trinkets as well as other people’s attention. Of course Nicky has some morals: he warns them all, “Don’t steal from anyone old or in a wheel chair,” as “that’s just bad luck.” The film takes us from Jess and Nicky’s first meeting in New Orleans, to three years later in Buenos Aires where Jess returns to throw Nicky’s world into a spin. There’s little more we can reveal about a con-caper like Focus without giving too much away.

The script is anything but predictable, almost verging on a little too erratic in parts, and leaving you asking yourself ‘what really just happened’ following the final scene. The film’s writers and directors, Glenn Ficara and John Requa possibly play it a little too safe, and leave us wondering whether a bit more depth could have been added to the characters, especially Nicky, without subtracting from their comedic value. The dangers of the grifting world remain too fleetingly touched upon.

Robbie’s performance is sparkling; it undoubtedly equals Smith’s, and provides the greatest complexity of performance. It proves to be a very strong follow-on for her from The Wolf of Wall Street, impressive for an actress who started her career in Neighbours. Together they are a dynamic duo – who have a fiery chemistry – and carry the plotline brilliantly.

Despite its minor pitfalls, Focus is an exciting though un-challenging film, leaving you wondering who is really conning whom by the end. 

Run, run as fast as you can

0

As David Cameron submitted his “final offer” to broadcasters on TV debates yesterday, other party leaders were quick to label him a coward, and rightly so.

But David Cameron and the Conservative Party aren’t only running scared, they are also acting in an entirely un-statesmanlike manner. I hate to agree with UKIP, but their spokesperson was right when he asked, “After praising what a good thing debates were for democracy as recently as 2014, why is David Cameron now acting chicken and running as far away from them as possible?”

The thing is, unless you’re particularly engaged with politics, general elections in this country are quite mundane. News channels will show endless reels of politicians with tired smiles shaking hands with local supporters, workmen and pub landlords, newspapers will carry analyses on the most minute of policy differences, and in the process we will all be thoroughly bored.

The TV debates were a way of reinvigorating popular engagement with politics. If the people can directly question the politicians, and if you can watch the different leaders battle it out on stage, then politics becomes more interesting and people will care more.

What is of even greater importance is that the TV debates are live. No matter how well you script your performance (think Nick Clegg in 2010), if you get a tricky question you’re going to have to answer it, or try to. And the relatively bare production of the debates will expose those politicians that try to wriggle out and leave questions unanswered.

The TV debates are about engaging a population that is plagued with apathy about politics. So if politicians aren’t going to think big and start talking about real changes and visions of the future on their own, let us force them to do so together, live, and on a national stage. That way we can challenge them at least in our own minds, or challenge our perceptions so we can make a better decision at the ballot box.

When David Cameron thinks he has the right to control the format, number and timing of TV debates, we have to question how much he cares about our democracy, about the people he supposedly represents.

The Conservatives I think know full well that opening up the debate to seven parties will dilute its effectiveness. On each question posed, every party leader will want to get their opinion across. But in doing so, the likelihood is it will descend into an uncontrollable and incomprehensible slurry of soundbites. It’s an outrage that any party would allow this to happen, let alone that they would try to make it happen.

Cowardice is one thing. If Cameron feels he cannot debate against Clegg, Miliband, Farage and the other party leaders, I have no sympathy. It is his job after all. But arrogance and an interference with democratic process is quite another.

That a governing party would have the nerve to try and dictate the parameters of debate in the run up to the most significant aspect of democratic engagement for the general public is appalling. The right to choose our MPs and hence our government only comes about once every five years. The least we deserve by them in the meantime is full and free access to information about their views and plans for our country.

I moaned when broadcasters excluded the Green Party and Cameron was right to demand their inclusion. But this was based on the assumption that we would not sacrifice close scrutiny of the major leaders who could end up controlling our government. One 90 minute broadcast with seven parties is not going to be a fruitful means of popular engagement in the run up to the election (especially when it occurs before electoral race even officially begins).

David Cameron’s offer to the broadcasters is cowardly, yes. But moreover it is unfaithful to the public he represents and the manner in which he laid out a “final offer” is appalling. I hope the broadcasters don’t back down, and if he won’t do a U-turn I hope he is ‘empty chaired’. We should be outraged.

Get involved in a worthwhile Oxford charity tournament

0

Two Oxford University alumni have organised a charity football tournament with the goal of raising money for two local charities.

Jonathan Fennell, Pembroke, and Jamie Dear, LMH, (both pictured right) decided to set up a charity football league in 2012 to raise money for Jacari, a local charity here in Oxford. The Charity Football League has since arranged this year to hold its first six-a-side football tournament, in addition to the league. It will take place at the Oxford City Football Ground on Friday 17th April from 3-6pm. They already have teams from Balliol, but are still looking for competitors to take part. The tournament is for an extremely worthy cause and is something that anyone who likes playing football, and is in Oxford on the 17th, should definitely consider getting involved in, or even just supporting.

Jacari is an Oxford student charity that has been providing free home tutoring since 1956 for local children aged four to 16 who do not speak English as their first language. The charity started as a result of cooperation between the University Labour, Conservative, and Liberal clubs, and has a history of wellknown backers and high profile speakers supporting the charity.

In addition to supporting Jacari, the tournament will also be supporting SpecialEffect, another very special local charity, dedicated to using technology to enhance the quality of the life of people with severe disabilities by giving them access to video games and life-enhancing technologies. The charity was founded in 2007 and has grown substantially in following years.

Besides great competitive, fast-paced football, there will be a cash bar and trophies for the best placed teams. Team entry is £100 (up to ten players in a squad) with all proceeds going to these amazing local charities.

If you are unable to make the tournament, but would still like to support these great charities and play some football, you can also get involved in the Charity Football League’s spring 6-a-side league which will run from March to September.

This is played at the Oxford City Football Ground.

The Charity Football League is still accepting entries for this event, so if you would like to enter, go to www.charityfootballleague.co.uk/sign-up. 

OUHC optimistic about varsity match

0

This Sunday will see the 115th annual varsity hockey match between Oxford and Cambridge being played at Southgate Hockey Centre in London.

The match has a long history, first taking place in Oxford in 1890. The following year, the match was played in London on neutral ground and has been ever since, changing venues a further ten times before the current venue was established at Southgate, which has been the location since 2003.

In total, Oxford has won the match 45 times, Cambridge has won the match 51 times, and it has been drawn 18 times. Previously, if the match was drawn, the previous holders of the trophy would retain it, but 2014 saw the introduction of a shoot-out in order to decide the winner. In the shoot-out, five members of each team are given eight seconds to score in free play against the opposing goalkeeper, which would make for an exciting (and extremely tense) finish to the match.

In recent times, Cambridge have come out on top, winning the trophy three years in succession from 2012. Last year’s match was extremely tight, finishing in a 2-1 victory for Cambridge. For many of the Oxford squad in this year’s varsity, it is likely to be the last varsity they compete in, and will be even hungrier for the win because of it.

This year, the Blues faced some difficult times early on in the season as the team settled in and team members took time to get to know each other. However, the group has subsequently begun to find form, finishing third in their British Universities and Colleges Sport (BUCS) league, and reaching the quarter finals of the national BUCS cup. The team eventually only went out to a strong Durham side.

According to spectators, the squad has also displayed some very promising performances in the Saturday league recently. Team members will be extremely positive going into Sunday’s encounter.

Transport from Oxford is available for supporters to watch the match, but space is extremely limited, so interested parties are encouraged to approach members of the team to book spaces as soon as possible.

Oxford Uni Snooker Club varsity win

0

Oxford beat the Cambridge team by a score of 27-5.

The contest occurred on February 28th at Riley’s Pool and Snooker Club in Cowley. The match involved 32 frames in total, with each team member playing four frames of the total.

The captain of the Oxford team, Paul Allen (St Catherine’s), led by example, winning all four of his frames, and scored the highest break of the match with a 31.

Team members Sam Bunt (St Hugh’s) and Gavin Cheung (Linacre) also won all four of their frames, while Sam Bentham (Christ Church), Abrar Chaudhury (Green Temple- ton), Xiaochun Meng (Merton), Alex Pappas (Christ Church), and Chris Speller (Mansfield) each won three of the four frames in which they played.

The match began with some tight frames, but with a series of one-sided wins by Sam Bunt, Alex Pappas, and Gavin Cheung, Oxford raced to a swift 7-1 lead, from which Cam- bridge was not able to recover.

Team captain Paul Allen told Cherwell, “Oxford’s man of the match has to be awarded to our reserve player Gavin Cheung, who, after a late drop out, only discovered he was playing two hours before the match. Gavin played exceptionally well, winning all four of his [frames] and compiling a personal best competitive break of 16.”

He added, “On the day, Oxford were too experienced for the newly formed Cambridge team but, with only four returning players, next year could be far more competitive.”

This was the first varsity men’s snooker match with Cambridge since 2003, when Oxford won narrowly by a score of 17-15.

Oxford hope for historical BNY Mellon Boat Race victories

0

The Boat Race is the biggest event in Oxford’s sporting calendar. With 161 years of history (yes this is the 161st Boat Race) it is full of antiquity and prestige, and sees the best rowers at Oxbridge battle it out side by side for victory and glory.

So much work and training goes into the teams’ preparations, with 12 training sessions a week this year, and no doubt years of training before the teams are even able to trial.

The stakes are so high, with not only crowds of Oxbridge students lining the banks of the Thames screaming for their university, but also the millions watching on BBC One, on which it is broadcast each year. Let’s hope we can all watch Oxford race to glory this year and take victory in both men’s and women’s once more.

OUBC will be looking for their 79th victory over Cambridge, which will put them within just two victories of equalling Cambridge’s overall win tally. But what are the chances of this happening? And how likely actually is victory for Oxford?

One of the squad members, Rufus Stirling, told Cherwell, “The squad is looking strong this year. We don’t have many comparisons with Cambridge’s speed so far, but our focus is not on them – it’s on making sure we go as fast as we are capable of.” Let’s hope the Blues and Isis manage to take their third victory this April!”

Moving on to the women’s race, the President of OUWBC, Anastasia Chitty, let us know how the women are getting on.

Their race is of particularly special importance this year, as, for the first time in the history of their race, OUWBC will race against Cambridge on the same Championship course as the men, and it will also becovered on the BBC.

Anastasia is extremely excited about this change and the opportunity to finally race on the Championship course.

“To have the opportunity to be one of the first women to compete in the Boat Race, on the same stage as the men, is an absolutely phenomenal privilege.

“To be in a position where what we are doing will inspire girls and women to take up sport, and rowing in particular, is amazing! I want to row in the Boat Race primarily because I love rowing, but also because this race is unique and exciting.”

With this in mind, and the likelihood that far more of us will actually see this race along with the men’s, their preparations are potentially more important than ever before.

“The Oxford women are doing really well at the moment, encouraged by some very strong performances recently in match racing, the team are excited to keep moving forward over the next six weeks.

“Having had three seasons to get prepared for our move to the Tideway, we are confident that we are preparing well for this new chal- lenge.”

Like OUBC, they have not yet finished their trialling and selection process, and the final announcement of the crews will be made just after the end of term, on March 19th. Anasta- sia then went on to talk about training and the squad.

“Training will continue in much the same way as characterised the earlier parts of the season but with more time in our respec- tive crews and more opportunities to line up against some fast crews in match racing scenarios. The team is characterised by an extremely strong internal focus, and so the magnitude and pressure of the occasion seem often distant to us.”

It seems that everything is going accord- ing to plan and all the girls are staying calm and focused. This is obviously a great sign for Oxford, but what does the President think of our chances this year in the big race?

“This year, the OUWBC has an extremely strong team, and throughout the season we’ve had great racing performances which have given us confidence going forward. However, we know the Cambridge Women will be fast and equally driven to own this significant moment in history.”

The first Women’s Boat Race to be held over the four and a quarter mile Championship Course will take place on April 11th at 4.50pm, so make sure you don’t miss this historic occasion. If you are unable to make it to London and the banks of the Thames, coverage will start on the BBC at 4.15pm for all to watch.

The 161st Men’s Boat Race will follow the Women’s at 5.50pm and will also be covered on the BBC, so make sure you watch Oxford try and achieve a hat trick of wins over Cambridge in the Oxford sporting event of the year

"Soccer lends itself to being depicted in an iconic way"

0

New York based illustrator Daniel Nyari is an industrious man. His art has appeared in a plethora of respected publications – The New York Times, The Guardian, FourFourTwo and more – and he is the Creative Director of Futbol Artist Network, a leading football-only art boutique. Bearing in mind my intimidating international phone tariff, I am keen to ensure our transatlantic interview stays on track.

Born in Romania, Nyari grew up in continental Europe, before moving to America in the late 90s. He inherited a passion for football from his father, who played semi-professionally and from a young age, he approached the beautiful game from an artistic angle.

“When I wasn’t playing or watching, I was drawing players,” he tells me, his subtly lilting accent crackling down the line. “I copied posters, Panini stickers, and these old school cigarette cards we had. I’ve always drawn footballers and when I became an illustrator, I wanted to make some of that work public.”

The influence these early drawings had on Nyari’s later work is immediately obvious in perhaps his most well-known illustrations: his portraits.

These framed head-and-shoulders are undeniably evocative of Panini stickers, but they are executed in Nyari’s own charmingly idiosyncratic style – a combination of block colours and precise shapes which captures the essence of the individual perfectly.

“I have an interest in reducing things to their bare elements,” he informs me, “which came from my time designing logos and websites. I always wanted to combine that with my traditional illustrations, so the football portraits are essentially exercises in thinking about faces in very reductive terms.”

“They look simple, but it can take up to 15 hours for one portrait alone. The most difficult ones to get right are the objectively good-look- ing footballers, like Olivier Giroud, who have very symmetrical faces with standard features that, culturally, we consider appealing.”

“With someone like Pirlo, on the other hand, it’s very easy to isolate their key characteristics. He has the big nose, the beard, the long hair. Then it’s all about the juxtaposition of his facial features; how I can scale down the size of his chin to emphasise the length of his nose, for example.”

“I have this idea that you can have 30 face templates, with very distinctive features, from which any face in the world can be made, just by combining different elements. A cheek from here, an eye from there.”

It seems churlish to refute Nyari’s claims, given his evident knack of achieving uncanny likenesses with the simplest, most elegant of patterns.

Clearly, this is a man who can see potency in the marriage of football and art.

“Soccer lends itself to being depicted in an iconic way,” he asserts. “A good artistic representation of football can be more engaging than a photograph.

“Everything that is inherently iconic about a moment, or a player, or a team, can be turned into a symbolic representation. It can be carved in stone.”

“I’m a football purist,” he tells me. “Because I’ve lived in so many places, I can’t pledge my allegiance to one team. I view football like I do art and movies. I can fall in love with different teams at different times. I was obsessed, like ev- eryone, with Guardiola’s Barcelona. Right now, I’m invested in Borussia Dortmund because of their narrative.”

As our interview nears the half-hour mark, with my next phone bill soaring, it finally descends, somewhat predictably, into fervent chit-chat about the Premier League.

“The thing about Mesut Özil,” Nyari remarks, “is that it’s very easy to transpose blame onto him. His body language stands out, so when Arsenal play badly, he gets a lot of unwarranted criticism.”

“You’re totally right,” I agree, “and I think he has been playing really well since he returned from injury.”

My out-of-plan charges continue to rise

Polo Club Cuppers Hilary 2015

0

The second Polo Club Cuppers of the academic year took place on Saturday 28th February 2015, to light drizzle and the backdrop of the beautiful Oxfordshire countryside at Holbrook Farm in East End, Witney. Teams from five colleges – New, St Catherine’s, Wycliffe, University, MBAs (representing the Saïd Business School) – competed for the chance to challenge for St Peter’s title as the Cuppers reigning champions, who had also returned to defend it. The teams were comprised of players with ranging abilities, from those new to the game at the beginning of Hilary, to seasoned players returning from participation in the SUPA nationals last weekend.

The opening chukka saw Wycliffe pitched against the MBAs, who won 3-0 despite excellent play by Wycliffe’s team. Nevertheless, Wycliffe showed steady determination from chukka to chukka, just losing out 2-1 to New College (winning goal scored by Emmanuel Hermeneus-Efunbote in the closing minutes) before earning a close-fought victory on pen- alties, closing with a 1-1 draw with Univ.

The effective communication between Univ’s players earned them another draw in their chukka against St Catherine’s, whose defensive strategies had redoubled in the face of their previous 5-1 defeat by Peter’s. St Catherine’s continued to improve, winning the penalties, which formed the culmination of their hard-fought chukka against New and earning St Catherine’s third place in the over-all competition. Univ continued to fight as they challenged St Peter’s, with Jack Edwards in particular playing a strong defence in his tenacious ride offs.

Peter’s were eventually successful, however, and went on to the final against the MBAs team, who played a strong, collaborative chukka. Nonetheless, Peter’s ultimately managed to retain their Cuppers crown, scoring 6-1 by the final whistle, which awarded second place to the MBAs. Special mention must go to Adam McKay of the MBAs team, whose player assistance and sharp responses to the changing line of the ball earned him the title of ‘Most Valuable Player’.

The atmosphere was wonderfully upbeat despite the gloomy weather, with spectators cheering on teams, sharing cake, and helping in the changeovers by holding ponies and adjusting stirrups. Particular thanks must go to Peter Derby, for capturing the event beautifully with his photography, and to David Ashby, Tom Meyrick, and the staff at Holbrook Farm, whose hard work and love of the game continues to make the Oxford University Polo Club possible.

OUPC are looking forward to our white tie ball at Blenheim Palace on March 6th, round- ing off a busy Hilary term with celebration and expectation of things to come in Trinity, as the grass season begins again.

Teams: New (Emmanuel Hermeneus- Efunbote, Lucas Wessling, Freddie Hamilton); St Catherine’s (Sally Cactús, Sarah White, Eline Thorup Ringgaard); Wycliffe (Nikolas Gower, Katie Paul, Artur Kotlicki); St Peter’s (William Hsu, Kuang Jacky He, Christiaan De Koning); Universtiy (Ryan Mao, Alex Goddard, Jack Edwards); MBAs (Adam McKay, Kasey Morris, Andrew Li) 

OUSC continue supremacy in pool

0

After months of tough training, hours of effort, aches and pains, and numerous dark cold mornings, V-Day had finally arrived for Oxford University Swimming Club. On Saturday 28th February, OUSC continued their supremacy in the pool, taking the tabs for the fourth year running.

Records were broken, personal bests smashed, and tabs shoed, as Oxford rose to an overall victory, beating Cambridge by an exceptional margin of 110 to 67 points, improving on last year’s success and reach- ing just shy of the historical record-breaking scores of 2013.

Despite a valiant effort from Cambridge, both the men’s and women’s teams won their respective titles. The men dominated from the start, leading Cambridge 26-14 after the first four events, eventually coming through to win 57-33.

Meanwhile, the women’s contest began with the two teams neck and neck, tied on 20 points after four events. However, a clean sweep in the relays eased the road to victory with a final score of 53-34, improving on the previous year’s winning performance.

The unique nature of the varsity format tests the all-round strength of the entire team, with each swimmer limited to a maximum of three races. The programme consists of seven individual events and two relays for both the men and women: a 100m for each stroke (freestyle, backstroke, breaststroke, and butterfly); a 200m Individual Medley (a combination of all four strokes); 200m and 400m freestyle; and finally four 50m freestyle and medley relays for the women and four 100m relays for the men.

Each race is a head-to-head showdown between two representatives from the Oxford and Cambridge teams, with the winner securing four points, second place three points and so forth. However, relay positions can change everything. Each university puts forward only one team, with the winner taking seven points and the loser three. Therefore, tactics and strategy are everything, with the emphasis strongly on the team rather than individual performance.

Highlights of the day include a record- breaking swim from men’s captain Xander Alari-Williams in the 100m breaststroke, and the 200m and 400m freestyle performances from Commonwealth silver medallist and ‘Swimmer of the Match’ (the much preferred title I’m sure), Heerden Herman. Star performances also came from President Naomi Vides, who won both the Individual Medley and the 400m freestyle, as well as contributing an exceptional swim to the women’s 50m freestyle relays. Swimming alongside the women’s captain, Rachel Andvig, they provided a strong lead for Millie Marsden and Holly Winfield to finish and secure the final win.

Great swims also came from some of OUSC’s newer members; freshers James Ross and George Stannard obtained Blues times in the 200m freestyle and 200m Individual Medley respectively, earning them their much deserved Blues. Also special mention to OUSC veteran Kouji Urata, who added a seventh Blue to his collection.

The strength and depth of talent on the team will hopefully ensure that the team will continue be a force to be reckoned with in years to come.

Unfortunately for OUSC, the season has not yet ended and we will be back to the grind at 7am on Tuesday morning. A select team will be heading up to Sheffield for BUCS Team Finals at the end of 9th Week and in Trinity Term a host of open water events will be taking place for the braver amongst us.

So OUSC will get to retain their trophies for another year, despite being reproached by Cambridge for failing to polish them. But what can we say; the inevitability of keeping trophies for consecutive four years is that they are going to gather dust