Tuesday, May 6, 2025
Blog Page 1232

John Williams’ Stoner: ahead of its time

0

John Williams’ novel Stoner was one of the most widely read books of 2013, yet 2015 marks the 50th anniversary of its first publication. Initially well-reviewed but virtually unknown in the intervening years, Stoner’s rise to fame and acclaim was all the more remarkable for being prompted almost exclusively by word of mouth amongst readers. 

Williams’ style is understated, subtle, even unprepossessing, so it is perhaps understandable why it was so overlooked. You only need to compare it with the type of literature which made a resounding splash in the same year – Sylvia Plath’s Ariel, for example – to see how it missed the recognition it was due. Stoner is about a quiet, patient man and his realistically slow trajectory from manual labour to academic work – a man who will seldom talk about his sorrows, which are whispered rather than screamed behind less than mysterious narration, though in no less agony.

Certainly the treatment of some issues in the book were ahead of its time: the purpose of academia and disability discrimination take up a substantial part of it, though this does not adequately explain why a novel previously all but ignored took off so spectacularly in the Twenty First Century, when much of its content revolves around the timelessly relevant subject of relationships broken by an unforgiving society. Indeed, Stoner has achieved success far beyond what Williams ever hoped for when he told his publisher in 1963, “I have no illusions that it will be a ‘best-seller’ or anything like that.” But a bestseller it now is.

The characters of Stoner’s wife, daughter and mistress stick in the mind as particularly well-drawn. A deeply touching passage illuminates his daughter’s nature, and the reasons for her miserable dependency on alcohol, “alien to the world, it had to live where it could not be at home; avid for tenderness and quiet, it had to feed upon indifference and callousness and noise.” 

Completely incidentally, this may espress something about the rise of the book itself: it needed the appropriate soil for its natural merits to bloom in the minds of its readers. Perhaps our society is more willing to express its feelings of alienation than was the case 50 years ago, possibly in light of a pervasive digital age – and so is far more receptive to Stoner’s melancholy.

However, if anything encapsulates the character of the book – its quiet courage and empathy in the face of a bleak reality – it is surely the last few days that Stoner shares with his mistress before propriety pulls them apart. He watches “with an immeasurable sadness their last effort of gaiety, which was like a dance that life makes upon the body of death.” 

Loading the Canon

0

Though he would dispute the title, the philosopher John Gray is contemporary Britain’s arch-pessimist – that is, if we set him against the standards of the winsome, optimistic humanism de rigueur found in most of the great thinkers alive today.

A former professor at Oxford and then LSE, Gray thinks that almost all of our beliefs about ourselves are total fictions. The most widely held and detestable of modern fictions are philosophical humanism and (liberal and illiberal) progressivism, which Gray sees as the petulant, bastard children of a debased Christianity. Most of the principles that Christianity bequeathed to the Enlightenment and modern humanism – that we are free, conscious and rational beings endowed with inalienable rights etc – wither and fade when the Deity is removed from the picture.

Gray argues that humanists can’t go on about inalienable human rights when there is no reasonable metaphysical basis for them. They can’t say that we are innately gifted with supreme Reason when the lesson of modern evolutionary biology is that our minds evolved at the behest of natural forces whose purposes were anything but the pursuit of truth and reason.

Because of this, he sees all attempts to ameliorate or improve our benighted condition as the hopelessly flawed spasms of a demented species. The notion that irreversible ethical advances can exist in human history is to Gray a lie. This is not to say that he therefore opposes all attempts to improve the conditions of people whose lives were once blighted by intolerance and oppression. 

Rather, he opposes the sanctimonious rhetoric of progressives who see all history up to the present enlightened moment as an aberration. “The good life,” he writes, “is not found in dreams of progress, but in coping with tragic contingencies… it means seeking peace – without just hoping for a world without war. It means cherishing freedom – in the knowledge that it is an interval between anarchy and tyranny.”

Gray’s gift for the frigid aphorism is second-to-none. At the end of Straw Dogs, his most famous book, he writes with dark and bracing assurance, “Nearly all philosophies, most of religion and much of science testify to the desperate, unwearying concern for the salvation of mankind… other animals do not need a purpose in life.”

It would do much, in my opinion, for our happiness and our sanity, to think on these words.

Rembrandt: The late works at the National Gallery

0

Rembrandt van Rijn (1606-1669), a master of the Dutch Golden Age, was known for his extraordinary treatment of light and the psychological depth of his portraiture.

The National Gallery is staging a landmark retrospective in his honour and it is a barrage of masterpiece after masterpiece. But breathtaking though this is, it is not what makes The National Gallery’s latest exhibition so captivating. The exhibition is much more than a spotlight on the greatness of Rembrandt’s work, it is a trip into the shadows that stalk his masterpieces. What is offered to the viewer is the tragedy behind the triumph: the broke, widowed, rejected and dejected Rembrandt. The dim first room (“self scrutiny”) feels like a church. The crowds, heaving though they are, soon become still and silent on entering. Sad and distant eyes peer worriedly back from the paintings. Before us: Rembrandt in 1659 (figure 1).

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG%%10860%%[/mm-hide-text]

Three years previously he had declared bankruptcy, a year before his beloved art collection fetched almost nothing at auction, and that same year the Amsterdam Painters’ guild enforced a rule that banned him from trading. In the year to come, he was to be forced to sell his home and move. By 1669, Rembrandt’s eyes look resigned (figure 2). Since his last self-portrait he had experienced the humiliation of being out-commissioned by his former students and the grief of living through the death of his son Titus. Seeing the tenderness of the late works against the background of Rembrandt’s personal tragedy made for an utterly compelling view of the artist.

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG%%10861%%[/mm-hide-text]

The second room (“experimental technique”), however, offers an alternative, with Rembrandt rising before the viewer looking forebodingly in control (figure 3). In this self portrait, two circles enigmatically shadow him: a calculated show of defiance; where the painter is down but not out. Among other professional fiascoes, Rembrandt had gone out of fashion. His loose brushwork clashed with the tight realism that was then in vogue. Accused of aging self-indulgence, Rembrandt chose to paint himself with these two mysterious circles behind him, referring to a legend that the Italian artist Giotto had such technical command that he could draw a perfect circle free hand. Rembrandt stands before us painted in defiantly loose brushwork, with perfect hand drawn circles behind him. His face almost dares his critics to say he’s lost it.

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG%%10863%%[/mm-hide-text]

However, pushing the boundaries of style and technique flew in the face of the establishment, and his desperate situation. Rembrandt could not afford with his debts to defy the established style publicly. Nonetheless, curator Betsy Wieseman has assembled a rich collection of sketches, etchings and prints that give us an insight into how audacious Rembrandt could be. One sketch shows a sleeping female nude drawn with simple spare brushwork. It could easily pass for a Japanese Zen painting. The economy of the lines and the delicacy of the brushwork is truly something to behold. It is a testament to Rembrandt’s bravery that this stalwart of European classicism chose to experiment with a form totally removed from his native context at a time when it could mean destitution.

This boldness was not just a private experiment. When Rembrandt was finally thrown a bone and asked to paint a large work for Amsterdam’s new city hall; the result so outraged his employer that before the year was up, the painting was chucked out. You can see why. The Conspiracy of Claudius Civilis (figure 4), which could be found in a later room focusing on light, is almost an impressionist work. The ghostlike conspirators huddle around their deformed leader, his missing eye illuminated by the soft, yellow light. It’s an almost sinister (and given the context) most definitely ballsy depiction of a proud Dutch legend.

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG%%10864%%[/mm-hide-text]

The impressionistic tendencies are most uncannily expressed in The Jewish Bride (figure 5), which has Rembrandt portraying a young couple mornfully caressing each other. He heaps squares of paint onto the man’s sleeve using a pallet knife. It lends the painting a tactile quality, which transmits the aching sensuality of the scene. But it’s also highly poignant: what the trouble is, we do not know.

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG%%10866%%[/mm-hide-text]

It is always in the eyes where we see Rembrandt’s emotional and psychological depth. It’s the eyes that animate The Syndics (figure 6), which were to be found in “observations of everyday life”, one of the last rooms. Here, a business meeting is rendered not only interesting but actually exciting, giving a sense of movement and ambiguity to the figures. The most striking gaze is that of the Apostle St Bartholomew, whom we see staring into some undefined point beyond the canvas with a stern gaze. Yet something gentler and sadder emerges the more you look at him. It’s completely captivating.

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG%%10867%%[/mm-hide-text]

Rembrandt painted the world with a passion that drove him to experiment in visionary ways. This was coupled with a sympathy that captured the most intimate moments of the human experience. He endeavored to do this at a time when the world he portrayed was decidedly against him. What emerges from this struggle is not resentment or anger, but a profound sense of humanity and vitality. It captured Bartholomew’s gaze, it touched the hand of the Jewish Bride, and it caressed the lines of the nude’s body. Most of all, it filled Rembrandt’s eyes. 

New term, new Audrey

0

Just before Hilary term comes crashing down on us like a ton of disillusioned first years, we get our first glimpse at the comedic salvation that will be on offer for our weary and work-worn selves in later weeks. The first Audrey of term offered sketches, stand-up and songs, and if you missed your chance this time, fortuitously we are able to give you all the inside information, as well as hints of what to expect at later Audreys and in one-off shows from the Revue.

There are plenty of familiar faces, with Georgia Bruce, Will Hislop, David Meredith, Jack Chisnall and Barney Fishwick putting in predictably strong performances, but their contributions are balanced by other equally capable comics at varying stages of their careers, from seasoned performers to relative newcomers.

The sketch comedy is, on the whole, stronger than the stand up, and provokes bigger laughs from the audience. This might be in part due to the change of venue to the Old Fire Station, where the more theatrical atmosphere gels more easily with the sketch comedy that is the Revue’s forte . This isn’t to say there aren’t some great solo performances – I can’t truthfully find fault with anyone who, as George McGoldrick does, tells me a whimsical, Gruffalo-inspired story about the deep web – but what’s notable about the successes is the ways in which they push the limits of what you might expect from traditional stand up, one example being Alex Fox’s guffaw-inducing piece about a dysfunctional upper class family in which he plays, well, everyone. As well as offering us something new, these examples also seem to fit with more ease into the Audrey format, possibly due to their more sketch-like, less traditional, nature.

The show is almost exclusively new material, which, whilst conceivably disappointing for anyone who has a favourite sketch, must overall be seen as a massive point in the Revue’s favour, as it demonstrates that comedic invention is in far from short supply. There’s also something for every sense of humour, ranging from the surreal, to the observational, to the satirical – there’s a fantastic #notallmen sketch which earned some enthusiastic woops from women in the audience.

As far as I could tell from my subjective experience of events, the audience seemed to be having a wonderful time, everyone finding this early offering from Oxford’s comedians as side-splittingly enjoyable as their previous endeavours.

Based on the initial signs, the comedy forecast for Hilary term looks exceptionally good – great news in this most grey and miserable of academic seasons – and if you haven’t had the chance to experience the Revue in action before, I’d definitely recommend it, although make sure to get in early – there weren’t any tickets available on the door at the point I arrived, and people were being turned away.

Historically, the Footlights might have had more of the fame, but with the talent of the current Revue members, I honestly would not be surprised if that were to change some time in the near future.

Barbarism begins: Meat is Murder at thirty

0
Rewind to 1985. The rich are making their first calls upon excessively large “mobile” phones, Oxford are busy refusing Maggie Thatcher a doctorate, whilst the BBC are engineering the downfall of evening television by launching Eastenders. Meanwhile, back up north, Morrissey, Marr and co are busy releasing their own kitchen-sink drama in The Smiths’ second album – Meat is Murder.
 
30 years later, and it is still easy to see how the album became The Smiths’ highest charting release, topping the album charts. Opener ‘The Headmaster Ritual’ still blasts unrelentingly a remarkably relaxed tale of schoolboy abuse. Ever cryptic, who knows if any of the tale is autobiographical to the lyricist. But who really cares?
 
Thematically, what’s a Smiths album without a literary muse? Their debut snipped up the playbooks of Sheila Delaney, gleefully sneaking quotes amidst their track listing. But Meat is Murder relies on the cult classic Elizabeth Smart’s By Grand Central Station I Sat Down and Wept. You need only read the title to understand why the work appealed to Morrissey. It doesn’t take too much to picture him lying down and weeping by Manchester station, scrawling quotes for ‘What She Said’ and ‘Well I Wonder’ into a large notebook entitled ‘Feels’.
 
‘Well I Wonder’ is a song of immense beauty. The work is a musical interpretation of the heart-breaking final lines of By Grand Central Station, “My dear, my darling, do you hear me where you sleep?” Critics were always so quick to shallowly condemn Morrissey’s use of literary sources as plagiarism. But, as always, he does not merely lift quotes – he gives them new life. A sentence upon a page now meanders atop the sorrowful plodding of Joyce’s bass and Marr’s soft acoustic. The sound of rain begins to filter into the arrangement as the song reaches a close. The arrangement is perfect, and it is clear why the band chose never to play the song live. It belongs to an isolated moment in time, one that is so overwhelmed with pathos that it could never be recreated live.
 
Melancholy aside, the album is also humorous – whatever Morrissey will
proclaim in ‘That Joke Isn’t Funny Anymore’. ‘Nowhere Fast’ marks Morrissey’s first foray into monarchy bashing. 30 years on, and the image of him dropping “his trousers to the queen” is only funnier. Similarly, the narrative of young love and contemplated suicide at the fair in ‘Rusholme Ruffians’ is somehow made very amusing. There is so much glee taken in the pain of young lovers. If someone “scratch[ed] my name on your arm with a fountain pen” in their arm, that’s as good as a marriage proposal, isn’t it?
 
But then there is the album’s title track – the closer, ‘Meat is Murder’. The song is a perfected dramatic performance. Sampled bone-saws and animals cries serve as a harrowing prologue and epilogue, introducing the main text of Morrissey’s vegetarian mantra. It’s a struggle to find a better and more affective opening line than “Heifer whines could be human cries” when uttered
in a grave-like whisper. There is something disturbing about how Morrissey’s voice remains so delicate while documenting such harrowing sights. Who knows how many people have been converted to vegetarianism since having their blood chilled by the track. And for a band so passionate about their views, who could ask for a better legacy than to still be affecting the dietary choices of their listeners 30 years down the line?

Preview: The Dumb Waiter

0

Harold Pinter’s claustrophobic two-man play The Dumb Waiter operates on two levels – what is spoken and what underlies this dialogue. The first scene I was shown was one of inane football conversation; however, what initially appeared as a debate about whether Villa will be playing home or away was interspersed with disproportional tension.

Tom White, the director, explains, “This is a classic instance of the random conversations that have a sinister resonance.” Indeed, I’m told they also argue about such controversial topics as sour milk, eccles cakes and boiled eggs.

The BT appears to be the perfect space for such a tense, closed-in thriller. They even plan to make the stage feel smaller (it’s hard to believe it’s possible) with strategic lighting creating dark spaces.

Tom Marshall, who plays Ben, says the aim is for them to be in “in each other’s hair”. White continues, “The BT is the perfect space as it is an enclosed underground stage.” Not only will it allow for an atmosphere of claustrophobia but it will also amplify moments of suspense and horror.

Ambiguity is the key factor to this play’s success. White talks about the importance it plays in creating tension – he even cut a line, concerned that it would be too suggestive of a certain interpretation.

Having spoken to Marshall and White, I’ve spoken to two-thirds of the production. There are only three of them: two actors and the director. Yet this is far from a disadvantage. Marshall raves about how “it was nice to be so small, it wasn’t overcrowded and allowed a space for us to develop.”

It also allowed, from what I have seen, the relationship between the two leads to develop. The play hinges on their interactions and the power play between them. This is evident in a scene from later in the play where Ben delivers the instructions of the hit to Gus; each line bounces back between them, quickly but in perfect sync. “We tried to instil scenes with deliberate symmetry,” White tells me. This looks like a clever production of a tense and interesting play focusing on the place of power, questioning authority and the limits of human patience. Definitely not to be missed.

The Dumb Waiter is on at The Burton Taylor Studio from 27th– 31st January.

Review: Belle and Sebastian-Girls in Peacetime Want to Dance

0
★★☆☆☆
Two Stars
 
Nine albums in, have Belle and Sebastian finally used up the last dregs of that ever potent miserabilia that has kept fans coming back for more for the last nineteen years? I desperately hoped not as I started listening to their latest offering, Girls in Peacetime Want to Dance.
 
The first thing to note is the album’s persistent political overtone. The band have put away their Arab straps, left Sukie well behind in her graveyard and focused their lyrics on the current political landscape. Just listen to opener
‘Nobody’s Empire’. Underneath a catchy riff, the lyrics document the bleak conformity of modern life. Although, when sung in the ever enticing Glaswegian drawl of Stuart Murdoch, it’s still delightful – even humorous. “Now I look at you, you’re a mother of two/You’re a quiet revolution,” he sarcastically coos in the midst of this wonderfully dark critique.
 
True, their dark humour remains as virile as ever. However, the album is more disco than the indie rock sound the band are famed for. If you’re searching for the classic Belle and Sebastian sound, give ‘Ever Had a Little Faith?’ and ‘The Cat with the Cream’ a listen.
 
The latter reeks of the band’s earlier hit ‘This Is Just A Modern Rock Song’. Its minimal guitar arrangement even comes with their trademark Pulp-esque voyeurism. Who doesn’t love lyrics featuring a grown daughter listening out for her mum having sex? Likewise, ‘Enter Sylvia Plath’ has the bands identity stamped all over it. You can practically see the young fangirls swooning whilst reading the title, nursing a copy of The Bell Jar and If You’re Feeling Sinister on vinyl. However, they will quickly be disappointed. The synth-heavy track sounds more like a Pet Shop Boys song – and a dull one at that. The album is certainly experimental in sound, but their alchemy is not always successful. Often, the resultant product is more iron pyrite than precious metals. Not offensive to the senses, but neither greatly satisfying.
 
Yet, the album’s lead single ‘Party Line’ is a nugget of pure gold. The funk guitar riff is delicious, prompting you to dance to “the beat of the party line” and become one of the conformists the song warns you about.
 
It’s great to hear an established band play with their trademark sound, and be successful. It’d just be great if this could be said about more than one-third of the album.
 

Review: Panda Bear – Panda Bear Meets the Grim Reaper

0
★★★☆☆
Three Stars
 
Noah Lennox, better known as Panda Bear, co-founder of the psychedelic group Animal Collective, returns with his fifth solo album after a three-year hiatus. The LP mostly follows on from its predecessor Tomboy, with a preference for synth loops and whirring sound effects. But perhaps the most notable moment is the ethereal ballad ‘Tropic of Cancer’, an especially poignant moment reflecting on the effects of disease on loved ones. A timely reminder of his impeccable voice, backed by a looped sample from The Nutcracker, this is the best song here by some margin.
 
For much of Grim Reaper, Lennox’s expressive tenor is shrouded by his favourite production tools and indeed ‘Tropic of Cancer’ is one of precious few moments where Panda Bear departs from his modus operandi. Rather, he sticks with what he does best: simple, repetitive psychedelic pop tunes, and the call-and-response vocal hook of ‘Boys Latin’ is a highlight. Unfortunately, though, atmosphere is far too often prioritised over coherent songwriting, an interesting bass squelch or melody left undeveloped, and several tracks do little to justify their run times.
 
There is certainly enough material here to make this an enjoyable listen, but Lennox could have achieved something closer to his best work had he stepped out of his comfort zone a little more often on this record.
 

Review: Death Grips – Fashion Week

0
★★★☆☆
Three Stars
 
From a band who used the image of cult hero and drummer Zach Hill’s erect penis for the cover of NO LOVE DEEP WEB, Death Grips’ latest surprise album perhaps shouldn’t surprise us. The track list, when read together spells out ‘J-E-N-N-Y D-E-A-T-H W-H-E-N’, presumably a reference to the upcoming release of the second part of their double album The Powers that b. Unsurprisingly, this loud and messy aesthetic very much encapsulates the sounds of Fashion Week.
 
Despite the fact that this is an instrumental album, the boot-to-the-face drumming of Zach Hill and the deranged metallic synth-driven beats ensure that this remains a balls-out Death Grips release, although the lack of MC Ride’s bare-chested howling does detract from the record. Yet, this does highlight certain aspects of the bands sound that otherwise might be cloaked in MC Ride’s shadow, as well as indicating a number of directions the band could take with Jenny Death.
 
The first ‘Runway H’, comes across like classic Death Grips noise-vomit, but filtered through the sludgy synth work of Trent Reznor and more recently The Haxan Cloak. ‘Runway Y’’s use of clanking, industrial-tinged bass and clean, cold synthesizer is reminiscent of some of the more experimental Grime instrumentals from producers like Murlo and Dark0. Most refreshing, however, are the truly unexpected tracks. The first ‘Runway N’ is perhaps the most light-hearted track Death Grips has ever produced, with pitched-up shouts and lazer synths underpinning a J Dilla-esque organ-led hip hop beat. The most unusual track, ‘Runway Y’, is also the most exciting. Like Fashion Week as a whole, it’s fucking nuts, wears its significant flaws on its sleeve but ultimately remains in keeping with Death Grips “nothing sacred, nothing serious” sonic manifesto.
 

Oxford Nexus Email System Disrupted

0

Students, tutors, staff and university organisations were faced with a problem on Sunday when they tried to access Oxford’s Nexus email on their browsers.

Users trying to access the Oxford Nexus email website via web browsers were informed by an automatic message that the site’s security certificate was not to be trusted.

The message gave users the choice of pro- ceeding, warning that security of the Nexus site could not be guaranteed, or returning “back to safety.”

Though the message was alarming, no data was stolen and the site had not been compromised.

A University spokesperson told Cherwell, “Due to an oversight the security certificate for the Nexus website expired without being automatically renewed.”

As a result, the security certificate for the Nexus webpage was temporarily invalid, prompting online security systems to respond by sending out an automatically generated message to all users attempting to access the Nexus login on Sunday warning that the site was untrustworthy.

The University spokesperson apologised for the incident, saying, “Though no part of the university website or its users’ data was compromised and there was no security risk, the University apologises for the inconvenience it may have caused to users and has put mea- sures in place to ensure such a lapse doesn’t happen again.”

Most students were indifferent to the incident, with few reporting any major disruption. The majority responded by saying that they either disregarded the warning and proceeded anyway or used other email accounts.

A second-year English student Ellen Brews- ter said, “To be honest it didn’t bother me that much, because I ignored the security warnings and just proceeded through the advanced settings. I know that some people were quite anxious to know if everything was all right, but as I don’t tend to use my Nexus account for anything that’s personal and not university or college related, I wasn’t too fussed really.”

Advertised by Oxford’s IT services as “the major communication medium in Oxford”, Nexus is vital in the business of the university – each student is automatically registered upon joining the University, and the service is used daily for correspondence between students, tutors, staff and campus organisations.

Run by the Oxford University IT services department, Nexus has been in use as a central- ised system by the University for several years with few incidents. The service is generally reliable, although there have been some minor issues with sending attachments via Google Chrome.

Emails from Nexus can also be forwarded to inboxes on mobile devices, a service which was unaffected by the incident on Sunday.

Staff at the IT services department reacted quickly to the incident, renewing the SSL security certificate by midnight on Sunday. Normal service was resumed on Monday morning with no further issues.