Tuesday, April 29, 2025
Blog Page 1518

Oxford student invents secret messaging Facebook app

0

The extension, developed by Owen Campbell-Moore of Keble College, allows users to encode secret messages on pictures uploaded to Facebook. ‘Secretbook’ then dechipers the hidden text for those with the correct password 

Campbell-Moore told Cherwell, “About a year ago I discovered a really creepy US Air Force grant (af121-050) which was looking for a system to collect and extract meaning from conversations extracted from social media. The thought stuck with me that it is unclear precisely how much access the US government has to private data on social networks and hence better tools really need to exist to facilitate private communication online.” 

The extension, available from Campbell-Moore’s personal blog, has already been downloaded 7,000 times. A Mashable article covering the story has been tweeted almost 1,500 times.

In order to work, both the sender and the recipient must download the extension. Once downloaded any user who has the correct password can access the secret message on the image by pressing ctl+alt+a whilst viewing the correct photo.

Campbell-Moore developed the extension last year, in a project supervised by Professor Andrew Ker. Ker told Cherwell, “The app works by modifying a photo, invisibly, to hide a small amount of text (about one tweet), which only a person with the right password can decode. The main challenge in the project was to make sure that the message survives the process of being uploaded, when it is recompressed by Facebook.” 

In a blog post, Campbell-Moore explained, “The extension utilises a technique known as JPEG Steganography to hide secret messages in photos by making many visually imperceptible changes to encode the secret data.” 

The post continued, “Steganography tools have traditionally been complicated (and often command line based) so a core goal to this project was to make Steganography easy and accessible so more people can take advantage of the privacy it provides.”

The Daily Mail reported that the technology could be used by terrorists. However, Campbell-Moore’s blog stated, “This application is only suitable for casual users and is totally useless for serious applications such as terrorism since detection would not be difficult for organisations such as the NSA.” 

Facebook were unavailable for comment.

Oxford Care Services face spending cuts

0

Britain’s largest public sector union has alleged that over 300 NHS workers providing support for those with learning difficulties face being sacked by their employer TQtwentyone, unless they agree to changes in pay and working conditions.

Unison have stated that the workers they represent face pay cuts of up to £3500 from their annual salary, and their holidays being shortened by eight days a year. The union say that workers in Oxfordshire, as well as Dorset, Wiltshire and Hampshire, will be affected.

TQtwentyone, which provides care services for people with learning difficulties, rejected Unison’s criticism. A spokesperson told Cherwell, “A number of claims made by the union are incorrect and misleading. TQtwentyone has an excellent record of providing social care for a number of years. Our priority is to continue to exist to provide that care and support to people.”

They continued, “To be able to operate our income needs to match our costs – at the moment it doesn’t. We are trying to protect the jobs of our valued staff. Our support services are not funded by health budgets through the NHS; they are mostly commissioned by local authority social services departments.”

TQtwentyone rejected the accusation they are “sacking people”. The spokesperson stated that staff affected will not see changes for over a year, and will keep the same NHS pensions, bank holiday enhancements, and travel benefits. 

TQtwentyone said, “Staff have been fully supported through this unsettling period of change and we have continued to try to work with the unions over these changes.” 

Dan Turner, Publicity Officer of Oxford University Labour Club, argued, “Cuts like these make an absolute mockery of the Government’s claim that their efforts to tackle public sector spending are fair or effective. It’s clear that the pressures exerted by three years of austerity have already had a demoralising effect on staff, and the inevitable result of further attacks on workers’ positions is that standards will continue to slip.”

He continued, “Perhaps the biggest insult is that this attack comes in the wake of a costly and unnecessary reorganisation of the NHS that has already cost millions, which could have preserved jobs and standards.”

However, one Oxford student opined, “I think it’s really difficult. Obviously it’s not fair for the staff to have their pay cut but if the cuts are really that necessary to make sure they can still supply their services then I can understand that. Hopefully they can come to some sort of compromise.”

Unison was unavailable for comment.

Review: Game of Thrones

0

I refused to give in to the hype of season three because exceptional TV shows are usually cursed to peak by the third season and dismally peter out. This was admittedly somewhat difficult as I was confronted by promotional posters with various steely glares that followed me in tube stations, but in a bid to remain objective I forced myself to enjoy the adverts for the new Jeffrey Archer novel instead. At the end of season two, I came to the realisation that Game of Thrones was just so much better without all the magic crap of the white walkers. The show attempts to include too much material in order to hook viewers from across all genres, when in reality all the viewers really want to see is nudity and violence (sometimes at the same time), and lots of it. However, on a nice Saturday night, curled up ready for the carnage, I pressed play. The first five minutes were stylistically tense and eerie, but then they cued in the music for the title sequence, and I got all excited (I’m a big fan of theme tunes; The Big Bang Theory was my alarm for the longest time). But that’s about all the excitement there was.

Thinking back about what possible spoilers there could be, I realise rather bemusedly that nothing actually happens in this episode, so no spoilers could be given no matter how much I wanted to ruin your life and your viewing pleasure. If you want a shiny new season to be epic, you want there to be some sort of narrative intrigue. Unfortunately, all that this episode offered was a semi-recap of last season: the time difference between the two seasons being so short (only a matter of hours) that nothing novel was introduced. Unlike the bridging from the first season to the second, there was no horrible aftermath to be dealt with, so the series could focus on emotion rather than action. However, the primary problem with the semi-recap was that aside from the three or four main characters, my memory of everybody else was non-existent. Consequently, subplots involving lots of old, bearded men conspiring against some regime were completely lost on me. The overall effect was that the first episode was slightly bland and lacklustre in plot; dwelling too long on irrelevant parts of the narrative. It may also be the fact that there was not enough man-candy time in the form of Jamie Lannister or Jon Snowe for it to be a stellar episode, or that an hour is inevitably too short for scriptwriters to inspire the hatred for King Joffrey that had sustained my anger throughout the last two seasons. Never judge a season by the first episode though, and there is still the potential for writers and producers to salvage what appears to be a disappointing start to a widely anticipated season.

Review: Made in Chelsea S5E1

0

Every so often, a groundbreaking series comes along which captures the zeitgeist, challenges the existing world order and defines future generations. Made In Chelsea is not that series.

There is scarcely a receptacle on earth large enough to contain my excitement at MIC’s return, except perhaps the chasmic vacuity of the cast. No but srsly, I love it. Scorn if you will, but I care for the characters as if they were my own obscenely wealthy estranged half cousins. Their joy is my joy. Their sorrow is…well also my joy, come to think of it.

The first episode of series five began with a fake party, for as the old adage goes: ain’t no party like an MIC fake party. This was followed by an initial uncomfortably staged scene, with Jamie being reprimanded by a financial advisor for squandering the Jaffa Cakes fortune. But the real focus of this series soon became clear. Spencer (eternal tool and feudal lord of Chelsea) is livid with Francis (former vassal and everyone’s favourite diamond millionaire) for revealing his infidelity to girlfriend, Louise (meh).

This poses a problem, as manchild Jamie and crucifix earring enthusiast Proudlock must decide which fellow ‘boi’ to live with. The conflict reaches its crescendo in a tense stand-off in the estate agent’s, with Spencer shrouded in a giant Ugg boot. Throughout the course of the episode, Spencer succeeds in establishing himself as a deeply vile human, manipulating Louise and convincing her that she is of minimal worth: ‘You think I’m desperate? Remember who the fuck you’re talking to. Have you lost your mind?’ I actually quite like Louise, and I feel sad that she hasn’t yet grasped that maybe the fact she cries in every single episode is a reasonable indication that she’d be better off without Spenny. The sight alone of Spencer Matthews’s smug little chops makes my ovaries convulse with fear. 

Yet amidst the emotional rollercoaster of Louise and Spencer’s arguments, viewers were reassured with familiar, comforting sights. Close-ups of obscenely expensive cocktails between every scene. Rosie wearing a hat. Millie unable to open her lips more than three centimetres. And silences so richly nuanced that even Samuel Beckett would be proud.

In other banal news, cheeky chappie Andy and twelve year old Stevie introduced us to the three new faces of the series: Fran, Olivia and Phoebe. Fran has been to ‘loads of gigs this week’, which apparently means that she works in the music industry. In fact, they go to a gig together for Andy’s birthday, which I swear falls at least every month. Surprisingly, it also seems as if self-confessed playa Lucy has now been fully integrated into the group via her friendship with Binky. Will she be replacing dear, sweet, interfering Cheska? Perish the thought. Perish!

This is going to be a series as packed to the rafters with drama as its predecessors, and despite the frequent guilt and disgust which accompanies my viewing of each episode, I for one will not be missing any of it. To conclude, I hereby refer to the eternal words of Mark-Francis Vandelli, whose sentiments best reflect my feelings for the show: ‘I don’t like it; I love it; it’s hideous; take it away from me.’

Tracks of the Week: 9th April

0

Zomby – W I T H L O V E

If you haven’t been following Zomby’s twitter, you probably should be. Along with chatting the most breeze about  Givenchy and Saint Laurent this side of hurricane Katrina, you can catch him performing a one man job of producing more beef than Tesco. A real spectacle. Well at least he still finds the time to write tunes, as this is a glacially slow jam with some of the best nostalgic vinyl crackle that can be found outside of Burial’s discography. A teaser for the album to come, supposedly out this summer on 4AD.

 

Deniro Ferrar &  BSBD – This is It (feat. Child Actor)

Production duo Blue Sky Black Death have been consistently sick the past year or two, but this sees them leave famed partner Nacho Picasso for North Carolina rapper, Deniro Ferrar. His somewhat less raspy voice lends itself better to the production, and the Vevo account seems to suggest Ferrar’s got something good going here. Time to sit tight and wait for something that isn’t released on bandcamp. In the meantime, check his single from earlier this year.

 

Tim Vocals – Next

This is some seriously tight hood R n B. Tim Vocals croons over The Weeknd’s ‘Next’ with a whole lotta heart. What’s more haunting is the context – the lyrics relate to what may or may not be Vocals’ personal problems with the feds, (getting busted for a dime bag – bummer), and the video shows him literally walking to the police station. Real shit. And whilst Tim Vocals’ twitter assures us he’ll be back in a few months, he still stops to ask for something to read.

 

Lil Durk – Everything All White (feat. Yo Gotti)

Apparently ‘All Black Everything’ is pretty 2012. (Or 2010 in Soulja Boy’s less fortunate case.) Lil Durk’s keepin it fresh with ‘Everything All White’. Only 20 years old and an album coming out at some point this year on Def Jam, Lil Durk looks here to stay. Peep the video at 3:02 for a funny shot of Lil Durk holding a baby. This vid was obviously ripped direct from World Star though, so I guess Lil Durk can’t officially be blown up if it’s not going direct to youtube/Vevo. So, uh, I guess you heard it on the Cherwell first.

 

Pharmakon – Crawling on Bruised Knees

NY based Pharmakon is the ‘power electronics’ project of Margaret Chardiet, and she’s pretty great at what she does. Which is getting synths to make really loud noises. Fans of melody steer clear. This is 6 and a half minutes of computers sounding like planes crashing. And it’s fantastic if you’re into that sorta thing.

Review: Paramore – Paramore

0

★★☆☆☆
Two Stars

Hayley Williams’ January claim that her band’s new album was influenced by Alt-J, as barefaced an attempt to cling to the relevance of a nearby Mercury Prize winner as could be imagined, cannot have been taken very seriously by many. Furthermore, Paramore’s lacklustre performances at Reading & Leeds must have convinced most that Williams should have taken the hint in 2010 and finally disbanded this ageing relic of the pop punk era when founding members Josh and Zac Farro left, claiming that the singer was treating the band as her own solo project. It seems like a distinctly classless move on her part to make an eponymous album when the band is barely recognizable as the same group of musicians who produced hit album Riot! in 2007.

Perhaps we could forgive her that if Paramore was anything but a few professional musicians going through the motions while their flame-haired lead singer tries to delude herself that her dream is still alive. First single ‘Now’ was disappointing, with Williams noticeably doing nothing more than trying to sound the same as she always has and sounding completely at odds with the oddly grungy guitarwork. This is evident throughout the album, except during three inexplicable ukulele interludes which serve no purpose other than to confuse the sound of the work. The other supposed hit, ‘Still Into You’, seems to display a glimpse of self-awareness as Williams moans “I should be over all the butterflies” (the cover art for Brand New Eyes featuring a butterfly) and also makes a vague attempt to justify her Alt-J pretensions with some electronic noises jitter around in the background. But the song doesn’t even manage to provide a catchy hook, once a reliable staple in a Paramore song. Only on ‘Proof’ does Williams come close to the joyful choruses of the band’s past, injecting energy into the chorus as she cries out “the only thing that I need/Is you”.

For those who manage to make it through this astonishingly long album, ‘Future’ provides a more stripped down sound, and something of a glimpse into Williams’ true feelings as she moans “We don’t talk about the past”. It begins to look like this might actually be an interesting point in the album, with wide-ranging guitars and slowly building riffs extending to a massive soundscape at which a belted, heartfelt chorus from Hayley Williams, who if nothing else has seemed vocally proficient, would put a high note on a severely pointless album. However, somewhat predictably, Paramore aren’t really sure what to do with the cacophonous crescendo they’ve created and so instead it fades out, fades back in again as if desperately begging for us to give it more time and then stops.

Review: Filthy Boy – Smile That Won’t Go Down

0

★★★★☆
Four Stars

Right now, Peckham seems to be making a concerted effort to shed its sheepskin-wearing, chandelier-dropping reputation with a cluster of emerging artists. Hot on the heels of downtempo electro-whiz kid Deptford Goth, here’s Filthy Boy, whose debut LP Smile That Won’t Go Down dropped last week.

Filthy Boy’s shtick is an endearing brand of brooding post-punk which dwells on the sleazier side of growing up in one of London’s less glamorous neighbourhoods. While the anti-romantic vibe is undoubtedly a well-mined topic in rock music, Smile’s collection of sordid little ballads are performed with a panache that sit comfortably alongside, say, Franz Ferdinand’s first two albums, or even Nick Cave’s early solo stuff. ‘Waiting on the Doorstep’ is a window into an over-accommodating lover’s exclusion from his girlfriend’s lascivious sex-parties (“Don’t mind me fellas! / Here if you need anything!”), while ‘Jimmy Jammies’ is a hilarious romp through an older man’s ham-fisted seduction technique.

In each giddily carnivalesque vignette, frontman Paraic Morrissey’s drawled vocals carousel around dissonant, Joy Division-style guitars. Morrissey has a knack for a good line befitting a man burdened with a surname such as his; yet the wit in his turn of phrase lies closer to Last Shadow Puppets-era Alex Turner than to his namesake Stephen: “Don’t think I don’t know what you’re thinking”, he snarls on ‘Naughty Corner’, not long after crooning “No matter how hard you try / You’ll still have my pupils dilated in size” on album opener ‘In The Name Of’. Best of all, though, is the menacing tone he takes on ‘Charm of the Dangerous Minx’ as his alter-ego salivates over a childlike lover “with spaghetti-hoop stains on her T-shirt” who’ll “thumb-suck her way around you”.

But all those name-checked influences are indicative of the fact that Filthy Boy struggle to be more than the sum of their parts; the lack of innovation in Smile’s rattling guitar-jabbing leaves the band’s sound feeling derivative, and rightly so. If you can get past that, however, the lyrical quality of the band’s songwriting richly rewards repeated listening.

Thatcher’s Dead, Long Live Thatcher

0

Politics aside, if we can blame Margaret Thatcher for anything it’s anarcho-punk. That said, they unfortunately deserve inclusion in this playlist as Thatcher and anarcho-punk go hand in hand like an uncomfortably polemical version of the Chuckle Brothers. Other than a speech from the Iron Lady herself, the rest has very little to do with Thatcher. Just tunes from the 80s. Enjoy.

Margaret Thatcher’s Death: Oxford reacts

0

Vice-Chancellor Andrew Hamilton described the former Prime Minister as “ranking among the most prominent of Oxford’s alumni.”

“Today,” Hamilton said, “we remember a graduate of the University who reached the highest public office and had a lasting impact on British politics and society.”

The statement on behalf of the University represents a sharp change from how it previously regarded Baroness Thatcher. In 1985 she became the first post-war Oxford-educated Prime Minister to be refused an honorary degree by her alma mater, because of her decision to cut education funding.

On Wednesday Banbury MP Sir Tony Baldry told the Commons, which has been recalled from Easter Recess to pay tribute to Baroness Thatcher, that the decision “reflected badly on the image and reputation of Oxford University”.

More recently, in Hilary 2012, strong opposition was voiced inside the University regarding plans to name a building in the Said Business School after her.

The Principal of Somerville, Baroness Thatcher’s old Oxford college, Dr. Alice Prochaska stated, “It is with great sorrow that we have learned of the death of Margaret Thatcher, Baroness Thatcher of Kesteven, this morning at the age of 87.

Somerville have released photos of Margaret Thatcher, née Roberts, from her undergraduate days at the college, as well as a letter the Prime Minister wrote to the college in 1980. 

“We are immensely proud to have educated Britain’s first – and so far only – female Prime Minister and one of the most internationally significant statespeople of the twentieth century. On this sad day, we pay tribute to the truly pioneering spirit that propelled her to the pinnacle of British political, and public, life.”

Before her death, Somerville College had awarded a number of honours to Baroness Thatcher, including naming a conference centre after her, as well as bestowing a number of scholarships in her name.

Cherwell understand that Somerville will now increase the number of scholarships bearing her name.

The college also plans to hold a memorial service, likely to take place during the upcoming Michaelmas term.

Margaret Roberts, as she then was, went up to Oxford in 1943 to study Chemistry. She excelled academically, and was tutored by Dorothy Hodgkin, the only British woman who has won the Nobel Prize for Science.

Baroness Thatcher served as President of the Oxford University Conservative Association in Michaelmas 1946, though she was not the first woman to hold that position.

Roberto Weeden-Sanz, a first-year historian at St Benet’s Hall and OUCA member, commented, “She was very much the product of her time, which was a time of great division and difficulty in society and although she did not solve that division, she was able to grapple with the country’s deep economic problems and allowed Britain to stand up proud, on the international stage once more. ”

According to Helena Dollimore, an undergraduate at St Hilda’s and an Oxford University NUS delegate, “at least 40 people” cheered news of Baroness Thatcher’s death in the conference hall this afternoon. Jack Matthews, Oxford student and Deputy Chairman of West Midlands Conservative Future, described the applause he had witnessed by delegates in the chamber as “shameful”.

Dollimore, a Co-Chair of Oxford University Labour Club, said that “obviously I don’t agree with Thatcher’s policies, but we need to recognise that she was the first female Prime Minister and that counts for something.

“I completely condemn the behaviour of those NUS delegates and have no respect whatsoever for their behaviour.”

Liam Byrne, President of the NUS, told delegates after the incident to “think very carefully indeed about how you respond to this news as conference continues.”

“We believe there is such thing as humanity. There is such a thing as sensitivity. And there is such a thing as respect,” he told the conference. 

“It’s not just that this would reflect extremely badly upon us if we were to show disrespect at this time. We are better than that.”

 

Margaret Thatcher: An Immediate Reflection

0

I have spent my Easter vac working as a researcher to a writer on his forthcoming biography of Margaret Thatcher – when therefore the news came through at lunchtime that the 87 year old former Prime Minister had passed away, it felt strangely close to home. Regardless of my political viewpoints – or, for that matter, anybody else’s – any assessment of Margaret Thatcher the person and Margaret Thatcher the leader is fascinating.

Of course the Thatcherites will see it as vital now to guard her legacy in print and on the airwaves whilst those who identify themselves firmly against her policies will set out to ensure that, whilst Lady Thatcher’s passing is treated respectfully, her legacy is analysed towards an end of recognizing her failures.

And her legacy will be assessed in the coming hours and days – rightly so. Margaret Thatcher’s impact upon Britain is undeniable: how she transformed the nature of the British economy, provided increased opportunities for enterprise, changed the rhetoric of political debate and promoted Britain’s standing on the world stage through a new kind of diplomacy.  The world we live in today is to a large extent defined by Margaret Thatcher. She once quipped that we would one day find it unbelievable that the Gleneagles Hotel was once owned by the state (pre-privatization), and to a certain extent I think she was right.

E.M. Forster’s dictum that it is private life that holds up the mirror to eternity applies to Margaret Thatcher much more than to any other political figure. For Margaret Thatcher’s legacy will be defined in many respects by her as a private individual in public life: the fact that she was our first woman Prime Minister, that she was our longest serving 20th century premier, that she was the daughter of a greengrocer from Grantham. Margaret Thatcher broke social barriers in a man’s world dominated by an established ruling class – an achievement that can never go underestimated.

In many ways Margaret Thatcher’s legacy can best be observed through looking at our political parties today. Margaret Thatcher may have reached out to much of the middle classes (and many of the aspirational working class) but at the same time she abandoned the greatest legacy of the Conservative Party beforehand: compassionate ‘one nation’ style conservatism. In doing so, the Labour Party was also led to depart from its own traditional base. Through abandoning pragmatism in favour of the now fashionable short-termism of ideology she architected the situation today, whereby our political debate is harsher and an ‘idolatory of the wealthy’ is all too prevalent within our society.

Margaret Thatcher’s greatest strength was her greatest weakness. Her no nonsense attitude and sense of conviction were her driving force but they were also the cause of her downfall. Whereas most of us see things in shades of grey, for Margaret Thatcher the universe existed in black and white. In a complex and delicate world, a lack of tact and a tendency towards strong rhetoric for the sake of it rather than a commitment to national unity, was Margaret Thatcher’s greatest failing.  

Margaret Thatcher was certainly a formidable woman and it is undeniable that all of us are, whether we like it or not, products of her period in power. The hope is that the next few days will be approached with consideration and sensitivity, not least out of respect for the Thatcher family. That Margaret Thatcher brought about such bizarre extremes of sycophancy and hatred will be no different in death than it was in life. The only difference is that it is now the stuff of history.