Tuesday 15th July 2025
Blog Page 171

Record number of BME students received places in 2022 as EU and overall applications fall

0

According to Oxford’s newest admissions report, for the first time in at least five years, the overall number of applications to Oxford has decreased, while many minority groups have seen record numbers of offers.

Oxford received an all time high of 24,338 applications in 2021, and received about 500 less applications in 2022 with an overall offer rate of 15.3%. However, the offer rate can vary significantly. Overall, UK applicants are more than twice as likely than international applicants to receive an offer. Applicants for Music, the most undersubscribed course, are more than 13 times more likely to receive an offer than applicants for Mathematics and Statistics, the most oversubscribed course.

By Region

Following a 29% drop in 2021, the number of EU applicants dropped another 20% to its lowest point in at least 5 years. Meanwhile, the number of admitted non-EU international students reached record numbers, increasing by over 11%. Within international applicants, Singaporeans are more than two times as likely than Americans and nearly four times more likely than Indians to secure an offer. 

Just shy of half of UK offers were to students from London or the South East, which was proportionate to the number of applications.

By Ethnicity

BME students make up a record proportion of admitted students, reaching 27.8% compared to merely 18.3% just five years ago. The proportion of ethnic minority students in Oxford is now similar to those seen across UK universities. However, the offer rate for BME students remains almost 5 percentage points lower than for White students.

By Disability

Oxford admitted a record number of students declaring a disability in 2022, handing out 15% more offers than last year. 11.5% of offers went to students who declared a disability, though this is still lower than the UK-wide and Russell Group average. The most commonly declared disability was a learning disability, which includes dyslexia, dyspraxia and ADHD.

By School

The proportion of state school students admitted in 2022 remains essentially stable, making up 68.1% of admitted students, compared to 68.2% last year. The admissions rate for independent school applicants remains higher than for state school applicants.

Independent school students are still overrepresented at Oxford by over 50% relative to the share of students achieving AAA or better at A-level that attend an independent school. Independent school students are also overrepresented in admitted students by over 100% relative to the share of age 16+ students attending independent school.

By Course

STEM courses continue to be the most over-subscribed. The lowest offer rates were for Mathematics and Statistics (3.8%), Economics & Management (5.5%), and Computer Science (6.1%), while the highest offer rates were for Music (51.7%), Classics and Modern Languages (45.5%), and Modern Languages and Linguistics (44.3%). 

The Oxford courses that received the most applicants in the 2022 admissions cycle were PPE (1,997), Mathematics (1,883), and Medicine (1,864).

By College

Univ (8%), Magdalen (8%), and St John’s (9%) were the most oversubscribed colleges, while applicants to St Peter’s (16%), Harris Manchester (16%) and Permanent Private Halls (25%) were more than twice as likely to receive a place at their college of choice. 

The college that accepted the highest proportion of re-allocated students was Harris Manchester (65%), while far-out colleges, St Hilda’s and St Hugh’s had 53% and 49% respectively. The lowest proportions of re-allocated students were at Magdalen (6%), New (10%), and Worcester (10%).

Overall remarks

Vice Chancellor, Prof Irene Tracey, commented on the results, saying “it is encouraging to see that steady progress continues to be made to ensure that those with the highest academic potential, from all backgrounds, can realise their aspirations to study here – despite admissions continuing to be increasingly competitive.”. She added that programs will continue to be implemented to ensure that Oxford students “reflect the UK’s diversity in many respects” and “motivate bright students to realise their academic potential and aspirations” at Oxford. 

Read the full report here.

Graphics and additional reporting by Maggie Wilcox.

record number oxford admissions

Protester glues themself to the floor of the chamber during Stock’s Union address

0

Kathleen Stock’s address at the Union has attracted hundreds of protestors, both outside the Union and within the chamber. A 500-person strong “protest party” played loud music outside the Union, and a protestor glued themselves to the floor during the event in protest of the talk by the gender-critical feminist. 

Guests queued for hours to get a spot in the packed chamber, with the queue at one point stretching past the Union and St Peter’s college. Soon after the event began, a protester, who has since identified themself in a tweet as Riz Possnett, glued themself to the floor of the chamber. The event was temporarily suspended and police officers were brought in to dissolve the glue, causing a delay of around ten minutes. Protesters within the debate chamber distributed leaflets which read “No more dead trans kids.”

On Twitter, Possnett explained that they firmly believe “trans lives and rights should not be up for ‘debate’” and vowed to continue fighting for trans rights.

The protest, organised by Oxford LGBTQ Society, began at Bonn Square. The “protest party” of 500 marched to the Union, where protests continued outside the event. Loud music and chanting could be heard from inside the debate chamber and continued throughout the event. Placards from the protests read “our existence is not a debate” and “crash the Stock market.” Protesters came to show their support of trans students of Oxford and reflect trans joy. One trans student, Elliott, told Cherwell “you cannot imagine the feeling of stepping into a room and sitting next to someone who five minutes ago tweeted against your existence”.

As Stock exited the Union, she was met with chants of “Terf lies cost lives”.

This article will be updated to reflect ongoing events.

Interview: ‘A Night of Queer Music’ at Holywell

Deborah Acheampong (Producer) in conversation with Adrienne Knight (Musical Director), Katie Kirkpatrick, and Eliza Hogermeer (both singers) on Vanguard Productions’ upcoming show ‘A Night of Queer Music’, a dramatic music concert, on the 30th and 31st of May.

What got you interested in musicals and singing? 

Katie: I’ve always been involved in productions, doing directing, producing, marketing, but I’ve never done any performing. With this, I wanted to get involved with performance, given my interest in musicals. It’s been super high commitment, but it’s a nice group of people and great vibes. 

Eliza: I’m quite new to Oxford, so I though this would be good way for me to get into the Oxford drama scene. I did a musical last term and absolutely loved it, so I’m kind of just trying to dip my toes into different things, such as directing. My first love was musical theatre: I’ve done it since I was a kid. So it’s been great to have the opportunity to take this material and put a queer spin on it. 

Deborah: I totally agree with that principle, I always thought that ‘The Phantom of the Opera’ would be so cool if it was two sopranos instead. 

Is there a character from musical theatre or theatre in general that you identify with the most?

Adrienne: One character from theatre that I identify with is Posner from The History Boys. He’s constantly pining for somebody he can’t have, and he’s just this awkward little guy. 

Eliza: Matilda – I know that’s very Oxford student wannabe. As kid I saw Matilda and was like: I love reading books and I like to sing — it was perfect. Also, at this age, Miss Honey, she’s just so great: I aspire to be her. 

Katie: I’m a staunch defender of The Prom (the Broadway original, not the Netflix). I think I identify with the character Alyssa in that, she’s a sort of girlfriend character. She has this song where she’s like, ‘Oh my God, I have to like get straight As do my extra extracurriculars and all that’, and she’s a lesbian the whole time as well. That’s me. 

Deborah: I’ve always loved Viola from Twelfth Night. I love the fact that she was so androgynous and how she naturally falls into that as it progresses. She’s so playful and fun, and I always love that. I feel like gender is very much performative, and, growing up, I was always a bit of a tomboy, which has made me come to realise just how fluid gender is. That’s what we’re trying to do with this sort of ‘mini musical’: slotting in a bit of gender-bending here and there. 

Adrienne: Musicals are so queer, yet there are so few that are explicitly queer. Thinking of examples, I suppose there’s Hamilton and the homoerotic tension which permeates that in many people’s view. However, it’s very rare that you get similar situations occurring between female characters, or gender nonconforming characters. 

Deborah: I think a lot of that also stems from the fact that producers an writers are so often male. Given that people tend to write what they know, it’s no surprise that we end up with so many queer male stories, and that’s lovely, but also, where are the lesbian composers? 

Eliza: This project has really allowed us to experiment with the classic songs, and the ideas of romance that they entail. We’ve been able to reframe those in this queer context, and say that we can also be traditional, and that we also have access to this rich musical past.   

What does A Night of Queer Music mean to you?

Deborah: With A Night of Queer Music, I guess the hope was that we would be able to break free of those confines which seem inherent to musical theatre, the way we typecast sopranos as heroines and all that. 

Adrienne: We’re planning to do ‘You Matter to Me’ from Waitress as a duet between two guys. It is, of course, a sensitive piece, and we wanted to subvert expectations of gendered roles in that sense. We’re also going back to something traditional, with readings from Sappho, but I’ve set them to music, so it’s entirely new in a sense. 

Katie: But, crucially we’re not doing the basic ‘Okay the man’s song is gonna be sung by a woman and the women’s song is gonna be sung by a man.’ That’s just outdated, casting roles as different genders is the norm now. However, I think making the song specifically queer makes it different and interesting. 

Eliza: Definitely, this show promises to be so many different things: there’s comedy, there’s tragedy, there’s romance. The songs are really catchy and familiar as well, so I’m excited to share and enjoy music with our audience and the cast and crew. 

Katie: The closing night is the night before Pride month. So come start your Pride month with us! 

A Night of Queer Music will take place at the Holywell Music Room on 30th-31st May, tickets are now on sale.

“I’m trying to speak to people’s hearts”: In conversation with music collective, Steam Down

When the line-up for performers at Exeter College Ball was released, most did not know what to make of this ‘Steam Down’. A group of self-described ‘Afro-Infinitive’ artists from South London. Usually, Oxford balls have the same old, same old student bands, who are good, don’t get me wrong, but Steam Down was so different from what we were expecting. Different, yet so insanely good. 

When Steam Down performed at Exeter Ball, you wouldn’t be able to tell we had just finished collections the day before. The air was electric, head banging and mosh pits, everyone holding each other and dancing like it was their last day on earth, it was as if the entire student body had taken a collective sigh and let loose. The burdens of academic stress, whether we answered this question right, or if we wrote enough for that question were forgotten in a way that the other performers at other balls I had attended hadn’t exactly managed. 

Curious about the performers, whose dreads and use of pidgin language reminded me so much of home, I sought after them for an interview with Cherwell. I wanted to know more about this band who travelled from Deptford to perform at Exeter College Ball.

Loading up Microsoft Teams, I am greeted by Ahnansé, the creator and founder of Steam Down. My first question to him is: “What is Steam Down?”. He tells me: “It’s kind of a bit of a creative institution really. It’s really something that I aspired to be kind of, on one hand, bringing musicians together, but then also creating new music. And also, to platform some of the people that kind of come through. So it’s a bit…multi-functioning.” Steam Down isn’t exactly a band with permanent members, but a free-flowing organisation of creatives. It’s such a unique idea, how does one come up with such a concept? Ahnansé says “I think a couple of years before I started it in 2017, I was thinking about things in the music industry. I felt like there weren’t really that many spaces for musicians to come together. And I also felt that I wanted to have a space to build something together with other creatives and to, I guess, platform each other in this in a way. That’s kind of what it started out as. And then I think it kind of evolved into Steam Down. And there are a lot of people that are part of it. And a lot of people have come through it and have gone on to do other things. And I quite like it that way…In summary, it’s about bringing people together. Especially in a live space is for people to feel a different energy than they had on them before. If you’re stressed, you shouldn’t be stressed anymore. When that happens, I know I’ve done my job.”

Steam Down’s aim is to connect musicians together and help people unwind. How does their sound help us forget about our woes of the week? I ask Ahnansé about ‘Afro-Infinitism’ and he tells me, “My definition of it would be, looking into the past, the present and the future simultaneously. So sometimes you might feel like, ‘Oh yeah, this feels quite ancient’, sonically speaking, and sometimes it might sound like, ‘Oh I don’t really know what this is yet’. So it has a bit of a future-looking space, like infinities, both infinitely small and infinitely large. And it’s also present in all directions at the same time.” Afro-Infinitism is about not limiting yourself to a genre or a timeline. It’s not new music, but it’s not one of the oldies. Ahnansé explains that “I think a genre is what happens when something’s settled, something that can be repeated. And I think if you improvise, as a musician, there’s not really that much of a boundary because you always searching and exploring, and the nature of exploring is not knowing. So they can never fit specifically neatly into a genre.”

If Steam Down can’t be assigned to one genre, then what sounds influence their music? If you’ve listened to their song “Free My Skin”, you may notice a myriad of sounds, from West African sax styles to a Caribbean style of tonal speech in the lyrics. Ahnansé explains the collection of sounds that comes from all over the African diaspora, “There’s such a long list, I don’t know where to start. But maybe I’ll say it this way: One of the influences is a member who is from Nigeria and he’s Yoruba. And he will tap into that, the tradition, in those spaces and, we share information across those spaces. I myself I’m from Grenada, Barbados, and St. Lucia. And I was fortunate enough to grow up there from the age of seven to 14. So there are things that I saw in Grenada, like the Tivoli drummers and the vocals that relates back to more traditional folkloric music from the continent. Apart from that, we live in London, right? And we were like, I grew up like we grew up listening to D double E and Grime music. And then you’ve got Pop, RnB, and Trap and all this other stuff, they represent a more contemporary influence, along with Afrobeats.

“I think if you love music, like we all do, we are able to connect to your heritage and explore music within that space. There’s so much to Britain, to take from and be inspired by, like when you’re in London, and walk down Peckham High Street, and you’re walking past Auntie’s shop on one side of the street, and there’s Fújì music playing, and then you walk past the Caribbean takeaway and then you’re hearing Reggae and Bashment playing on the other side. Just by walking down one high street, you’ve already culture-hopped different times, eras, and spaces, depending on the age of the people that are there. So in one day, you were all around that and that’s why it’s so natural to be able to pull from spaces in the diaspora, because it lives here [in London]. So there’s a lot of musical heritage, learning, and information, that I’ve learned and others have learned through the experience of just being in London and playing with other people that are from different parts of the diaspora.”

The sounds of the diaspora are commonly drawn by UK music artists like Santan Dave, Stormzy, and J Hus who draw from Afro-Swing, Afro-Beat and Hip-Hop genres to incorporate their West African heritages in a UK rap style. For them, in their music, a sense of pride in their Africanness and their Black Britishness is conveyed. References to Black British culture and slang can be found throughout their lyricism, and the beats and instrumentals feature Afrobeat and Reggae-inspired tunes. I ask Ahnansé if this sense of pride in Blackness and being a part of the diaspora is a message that Steam Down seeks to convey in their music. He tells me “I think there’s a universal message, there’s the Afro message, and there’s the individual message and that’s happening simultaneously. And I want to keep it that way. So that everybody can get something from everything if they’re open to it, even if it’s a culture that you’re not from, that culture has created something, and it can enrich your life if you allow it, if you respect it, use it wisely, and adopt it. 

“Not to be really political, but because we have so many political issues [in the U.K.] that I feel stem from fundamental ways of thinking that need to kind of change. And I think music, I’m not really necessarily trying to speak so much to people’s minds, even though there’s lyrics, I’m trying to speak to people’s hearts. ‘Free My Skin’ is exactly that, the energy of the song should also give you that feeling of release, the words are just a starting point for emotional transformation. And you can see it in a room when people let go. What are you allowing yourself to be free from in that moment? That’s up to you. 

“We have faith, colonisation, and racism, and that’s something that’s affected us both internally and externally. And then at the same time, there’s the things that we’ve internalised, like colourism, that’s an internalised form of racism. How is your self-value and self-worth and how is that related to colonisation, and racism, how do you perceive yourself or even how do we perceive our own cultures? How open are we to some of our heritage when some of its been demonised because the ‘Western’ way needs to take precedence, that’s essentially the work of colonisation and racism, so to ‘Overcome’ and ‘Free My Skin’ focuses on letting go of it internally. Letting go of the negative impacts of that colonisation, and also start respecting more of our heritage in some places, for example, if you’re a Black woman, and you have your natural hair, amongst other Black people, it’s very much celebrated, whereas maybe 30 years ago, wouldn’t have necessarily been celebrated.”

In regard to respecting our culture and forming a greater appreciation for it, I ask Ahnansé, “What is your reaction to people who claim that the use of Pidgin or Multicultural London English alienates them and makes Black music unrelatable?”. Ahnansé answers, “If it alienates you, then you’re not really listening. We don’t need to break it down so that you understand, we understand a lot of things and non-verbally…Something is being communicated beyond the language. This country prioritises the academic and intellectual over other means of communication and other ways of viewing the world. So just because you can’t understand it from an intellectual faculty, doesn’t mean you can’t understand it from your other faculties.”

It’s true that being able to connect to music despite a language barrier is now becoming more and more commonplace. Nothing stops the K-Pop stans from butchering the pronunciation of the Korean language when they sing their favourite songs, and yet, they still feel connected, or at least, get the general sense of what the song intends to convey to them, despite not being able to understand the lyrics. In a world where Afro variations of music have become more popular with Burna Boy, Asake and WizKid going global, I ask Ahnansé whether he supports Afro-Beats going global, or if we should gate-keep the genre from those who threaten to misinterpret it. Ahnansé tells me “I think a lot of the music that is shared within those spaces is music that’s made to sell because that’s what the internet is predominantly used for. So products are used as a means of exchanging commercial value. But I don’t think the deepest aspects of any culture ever gets shared because I don’t think that you can monetize it easily…People who want to learn will learn about our principles, and ways of life, if you don’t you’ll consume the monetised versions of our cultures without getting to know the deeper stuff, which is intangible.” 

Music is an art form that speaks to people without the need for intellectual words and lyrics. If you’re looking for intellectualism, look towards literature, or Kendrick Lamar I suppose. But for the rest of us who just need a good song to play in the shower after a good gym sesh, or need to unwind after a particularly heinous finals paper, music can be the perfect answer. Steam Down as a musical collective has an interesting perspective on the benefits that music can have for us, a perspective that seems to speak directly to Oxford students who, especially in Trinity term exam season, have their fair share of burdens. So on your way to your next exam, I recommend giving ‘Free My Skin’ and ‘Overcome’ a listen, it might steel you for your next battle, or help loosen those knots in your stomach. Nonetheless, listening to music is an infinite experience, so make the most of your downtime. 

Stock should speak at the Union, says Rishi Sunak

0

The row over Kathleen Stock’s invitation to speak at the Oxford Union has made it to Downing Street, as Rishi Sunak told The Telegraph he thinks the event should go ahead.

As many as 1000 protesters are expected to picket the Union on Tuesday night while Stock speaks in the chamber, in the culmination of a protracted dispute which has divided students and staff. Stock has been accused of transphobia, and her invitation has sparked uproar among segments of the student body who do not believe the Union should host her.

Sunak told the newspaper he believed students should be allowed to hear and debate Stock’s views, as she is a prominent voice in the debate surrounding trans rights.

“University should be an environment where debate is supported, not stifled. We mustn’t allow a small but vocal few to shut down discussion. Kathleen Stock’s invitation to the Oxford Union should stand.”

“A tolerant society is one which allows us to understand those we disagree with, and nowhere is that more important than within our great universities,” he said.

This comes after students and academics at Oxford have signed a series of opposing letters. An initial letter to The Telegraph that supported Stock’s visit in the name of free speech was signed by 40 academics, swiftly followed by a similar student letter with over 100 signatures. An opposing letter against Stock’s visit was also published last week with signatures from over 100 academics.

Controversy over Stock’s invitation to the Oxford Union coincided with a decision by the Oxford Student Union (SU) to ban the Union from having a stall at freshers’ fair, although the SU denies that this was related. The ban will not take effect, as the University intervened by telling the SU that for the freshers’ fair they would consider the Union to be a student society. This also likely means that the Union will be able to avoid the £4000 cost of a commercial stall.

The dispute comes at a significant moment for the political debate over speech in universities. Later this week, Sunak is set to confirm the Cambridge University academic Arif Ahmed as a Director of Free Speech and Academic Freedom. Under the recently-passed Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Act 2023, Ahmed will have the power to investigate universities and student unions in England and Wales who are accused of censoring academics and speakers for their views. Ahmed was criticised by the master of Gonville and Caius College and Cambridge students for inviting the gender-critical feminist Helen Joyce to give a talk about cancel culture.

App interfaces can change calorie consumption, Oxford study finds

Small changes to the infrastructure and user-interfaces of apps such as UberEats and Deliveroo can reduce the calorie consumption of customers by up to 15%, a new study by the University of Oxford has shown.

Hailed by researchers presenting at the European Congress on Obesity in Dublin, the study led by innovation agency Nesta alongside colleagues from the University of Oxford emphasised the importance of design to the development of consumer choices and dietary habits – without “only having to eat green salads”. 

Carried out on a pool of approximately 23,000 adults across the UK, the randomised trial focused on examining the impact of 14 different key changes on a simulated delivery app, the results of which were subsequently compared with data produced by a separate control app. 

According to researchers, changes including the implementation of smaller, default portion sizes, the ready availability of nutritional information and the promotion of healthier restaurants and food options led to an average drop of 209 calories per meal and a significant reduction in food intake, results highly praised by the chairman of the National Obesity Forum, Tam Fry.

Speaking in conversation with The Telegraph, Fry stated that “This meticulous research ticks all the boxes. When the app allows the customer to avoid opting for unhealthy choices and directs them to lower calorie options, this is just what the doctor ordered.”

As of 2021, the national obesity rate was estimated to be as high as 25.9%, with a further 37.9% of England’s population described as overweight, statistics which have spurred government intervention within the food and hospitality sector in recent years with varying levels of success.

Yet following the decision in April 2022 to make calorie disclosure a compulsory feature of most restaurant menus as part of wider initiatives to curb rising obesity rates, backlash concerning the policy’s hidden impact on those suffering from eating disorders has remained unresolved.

According to Fry, it is thus “reasonable for the app to be able to hide calorie counts for people who find that they add to their eating disorders or, simply, annoy them”.

With popular delivery apps such as Deliveroo, UberEats and Just Eat currently raking in as many as 25 million customers a year, the cooperation of leading companies is an integral aspect of any potential implementation of the study’s findings.

Dr Bianchi, a member of the Behavioural Insights Team at Nesta, a British innovation-centred charity, and one of many working on the trial alongside colleagues from the University of Oxford has, however, said that research may be far from over, with “Testing similar initiatives with real restaurants and delivery apps […] important to assessing the long-term impact of these interventions in the real world.”

According to Bianchi, “Further research should also explore the best way to balance desired health impacts while minimising effects on businesses and on cost-of-living concerns for consumers.”

Guardians of the Galaxy 3

The usual minor spoilers ahead.

Bradley Cooper’s Rocket Racoon spends a decent bit of Guardians of the Galaxy 3 in the medical bay. To the cinema aficionados, the diagnosis for the Marvel Cinematic Universe is looking equally grim. Does the old crew of Guardians resuscitate the brand? Or is coming back to Marvel like Zoe Saldaña’s Gamora meeting Chris Pratt’s Star Lord: an awkward reunion with an ex we’d forgotten?  

The eugenicist High Evolutionary wants his old pet, Rocket, back. Rocket’s got injured by Adam Warlock as part of the scramble. Instead of bothering the intergalactic RSPCA, the Guardians go on another tune-filled, entertaining journey to save their furry friend. 

I think part of the reason why this iteration of the Guardians of the Galaxy is ending is because Marvel are running out of animals to use as joke names for Rocket. “Trash Panda?” “No, we’ve used that one.” “Rabbit?” “Thor did it.” “Squirrel?” “Excellent.” Tony Stark wins it with “Build-a-Bear”, if you ask me. 

Pom Klementieff and Dave Bautista absolutely smash it as Mantis and Drax. Charisma. Humour. Emotion. Chukwudi Iwuji does a great job as the High Evolutionary, although I doubt he’ll make it into the pantheon of legendary Marvel villains simply because he’s so pure evil you can’t see his point of view (compare and contrast Thanos and Killmonger, 20 marks). On the plus side, for the first time in a while, he’s a villain who’s got an actual reason for listening to classical music. Reasons other than being a psychopathic villain exist, I’m told. 

Even at two and a half hours, it’s more crowded than a Marvel writer’s room. The character relationships are as ever spot on, Drax and Mantis being by far the funniest, but if you stop and think too long on the walk back from the cinema you’ll realise a few too many of the others were talking, sometimes-walking plot functions. Will Poulter’s Adam Warlock in particular is very funny, very well-written, very nicely-acted, but ultimately ends up a big, sparkly, gold deus ex machina

Make sure you bring tissues with you, because with ample flashbacks to Rocket Raccoon’s caged friends, Gunn throws not so much the kitchen sink as a zoo of mangled animals at you. Waymond from Everything Everywhere All at Once seems to have visited and stuck a series of big, cute eyes all over this film. The entire Guardians philosophy is dowsing you with a disorientating mixture of cuteness and horror, and watching you smile back as if it’s your own child. It’s a fitting way to end a trilogy that earned its stripes compelling you to care about a tree who makes even my essays seem verbose. 

Pack your glasses with the tissues: there’s a lot of spinning. It’s a film you could watch a surprising amount of while in a handstand. I was almost disappointed when Dead or Alive’s ‘You Spin Me Right Round’ didn’t get used in the soundtrack given the amount of camera action that’s been fit in. Having said this, Fast X is about to come out, so I’m sure in a week’s time Guardians will look positively sedentary. 

The use of setting is, as usual for Guardians films, clever. Each location is just as colourful on the screen as the comparable Ant Man and The Wasp: Quantumania, but feels more thought-out. The use of “Counter-Earth” is particularly underrated, I think: just when you’re expecting a big space battle, Gunn lands the spaceship somewhere that looks just down your road. Watch out for the classical music villains lurking behind the bins. 

In the music department, ‘Since You Been Gone’ is probably the standout track in the line-up, and with the state of Marvel at the moment you suspect it’s what the Disney executives might be singing through James Gunn’s window in a few months. Gunn has the skill of writing and directing, regardless of what you think of the details of the film, funny, emotional and coherent stories that balance a sense of blockbuster and intimacy.

If you’ve been sitting at home with your cork board and red string, becoming the next Hercule Poirot trying to work out how on earth the MCU fits together nowadays, give this intergalactic film a try. It’s refreshingly unconnected. If you think Rocket Racoon is an odd-sounding sandwich, it might not be for you. Perhaps in a franchise about a group of misfits, facing a villain who wants absolute perfection, the beauty yet the flaws of Guardians of the Galaxy 3 make it a fitting end to the trilogy. 

The Case for No: Why JCRs should motion to disaffiliate from the National Union of Students

0

CW:references to anti-Semitism

The Hilary Term university-wide referendum (with only 5% turnout), resulted in the Oxford University Student Union’s (SU) continued affiliation with the National Union of Students (NUS), a nation-wide organisation of university and college students that has been recently been plagued with allegations of antisemitism and abuse. With 56% voting to remain affiliated and 42% wanting to disaffiliate, it was yet another resounding ‘NO’ answering the question of whether the SU should sever ties with the NUS.

This was not the first time the Oxford University has held such a referendum, nor was Oxford the first university to hold such a referendum this year: back in 2016, Oxford’s first disaffiliation referendum failed with similar margins but boasted a much bigger turnout (27.7%). In the last 6 months, student unions from the universities of Warwick, Brighton, Queen Mary and Reading all voted to disaffiliate for essentially the same matters I am now raising for debate: how the NUS treats Jewish students. Much can be said about how the ‘No’ campaign at Oxford was run this time around, but I would be amiss to obsess over that result. Oxford’s students voted and we must all respect that. However, I am here to make the case that JCRs, being separate legal entities from the SU, should and must all vote to disaffiliate from the NUS.

Before I dive into the issues, however, I will make a few preliminary points. 

Firstly, time is of the essence. If your JCR’s constitution is anything like mine, there is only one opportunity every year to review its affiliation. For Brasenose, this is at the upcoming fifth week Trinity term meeting, and the JCR Secretary is required to propose the motion. So, if after reading this article you are indeed convinced, read up on your constitution – or change it, it’s easier than you think – and start proposing those disaffiliation motions. 

Secondly, I understand and appreciate that certain topics discussed in this article are deeply personal for some readers. I sincerely hope that any conversation that you may have about this topic will remain respectful, cordial, and productive like this article intends to be. 

Thirdly, the point of this article isn’t necessarily to advocate for disaffiliation, however counterproductive that may seem. I don’t claim to be an expert on the NUS by any means, and so I cannot predict the practical consequences of disaffiliation with any degree of accuracy. Rather, I am making the case for ‘No’ in the hopes that it will encourage the crucial dialogue amongst students so we can have the conversation that we should have had last term, about antisemitism, about the Israel/Palestine conflict, about which organisations we choose to affiliate ourselves with and why. What I don’t want, is for JCRs to blindly subscribe to organisations that we know little about and ask ourselves what happened after the fact when things go horribly wrong. And horribly wrong things did go.

The NUS has an antisemitism problem. This is no secret to anyone who has been following the saga around the ousting of their last President, Shaima Dallali. The Government, in their press release announcing the suspension of relations with the organisation, said that the antisemitism issues are ‘well-documented and span several years.’ This is all because the NUS commissioned an independent report by Rebecca Tuck KC, a horrifying account of how Jewish students were mistreated and ostracized.. I will detail some of her findings now. 

In a 2017 survey about the experience of Jewish students, a whopping 49% stated that they would not feeling comfortable attending NUS events. According to Ms Tuck, this figure would be no better today. What then, exactly, has gone so wrong for a near majority of Jewish students nation-wide to feel uncomfortable attending events hosted by an organisation that is supposed to represent all students? 

In her report, Ms Tuck details how Jewish students were alienated due to their perceived affiliation with ‘Zionist’ viewpoints, and how such an environment went unchallenged within the NUS. When these students brought complaints and sought redress within the organisation, their concerns were dismissed for ‘bad faith’ or improper motive, and this resulted in a culture of hostility towards Jews. She also found that Jewish students suffered harassment related to their race and or religion which the organisation’s policies failed to address, in a potential breach of the Equalities Act 2010. 

The following is worth quoting in full: “It is apparent from this report – and indeed from other reports over the last 17 years – that the culture within NUS and at NUS events has been perceived by many Jewish students, for good reason, as hostile.” (emphasis added)

Here are some accounts of the experience of Jewish students at NUS conferences: 

“There was an open endorsement of violence against Israeli civilians and Zionist sympathisers at NUS Society and Citizenship Zone Conference in 2011 without challenge. This made me feel unsafe as a Jew and I left the event early. I did not attend any more Zone events.”

“At the 2016 conference there was a motion for the NUS to mark HMD [Holocaust Memorial Day]. I was really really shocked that someone could speak against the motion. The person who spoke against had prepared a speech, removing the Jewish nature of the Holocaust talking about gay/Roma/communist etc. victims. Megan Dunn [then President] spoke up and asked why there was a problem marking the centrality of antisemitism in the Holocaust. I had never before come across people who genuinely did not understand the antisemitic nature of the Holocaust. For that position to be applauded was very shocking. It had been tabled to be a unifying motion.” (emphasis added).

As one Palestinian delegate wrote:

“Antisemitism plagues every part of the NUS…. As a Palestinian, I find it deeply offensive that support for Palestinian human rights is being used to mask blatant antisemitism. The conflation between the conflict in Israel-Palestine and British Jews must stop. Our Jewish students cannot be made to feel responsible for a conflict that is being waged thousands of miles away. They cannot be made to feel unsafe, as they are hounded and targeted at our university. Instead, we must listen to them and act on their concerns. The advocation of Palestinian rights and valid criticism of the Israeli government should never lead to or justify racism against Jewish students in Britain.”

This must stop. As many have pointed out, the NUS is committed to addressing these concerns and to transform this hostile culture. However, as Ms Tuck notes, “[altering] a culture is a notoriously difficult task.” It is only right that JCRs motion to disaffiliate from this organisation in order to signal our trenchant condemnation of the antisemitism within the NUS and send a strong message about our values and beliefs. No one should be made to feel unwelcome because of their race or religion, and this is especially true for a national organisation that is supposed to represent all

There are, however, broader lessons to take away from this experience. As Ms Tuck notes, this culture of hostility is directly linked to the Israel/Palestinian conflict, which in turn stems from the conflation of British Jews and the Israeli government. Anecdotal accounts tell me that this may also be true in Oxford, although I cannot confirm the extent or severity of these issues. It is crucial that we, as a university, do not slip into the same toxic mindset that has plagued the NUS for the better part of the last two decades. We must always remember that a person’s political opinions are not defined by their race or religion, and we must never allow Jewish students to feel unwelcomed based on what their perceived views are.

This is why I want you, the reader, to propose and fiercely debate disaffiliation motions within your own JCRs. This is an important conversation, and it goes to the heart of who we are as Oxford students and what we believe in. At the end of the day, whether our JCRs are affiliated with this one organisation is of little significance. However, what is important is that the message is loud and clear: hate, in any form, must never be tolerated as we work towards becoming a more inclusive and welcoming university for all. 

Image Credit: Jimmy Harris//CC BY 2.0 via Flikr

LB’s — Summertown’s one-of-a-kind Lebanese deli

0

One of the defining factors of Oxford’s food scene is just how many different cuisines there are on offer. It never ceases to amaze me how, in such a small city, there are so many opportunities to experience authentic food and cultures. From Persian food on Cowley road to Greek dishes at Georgina’s in the Covered Market, and Roman pinsa at Bbuona, there really is no shortage of diversity. LB’s in Summertown is yet another example of that with a remarkable selection of homemade dishes giving a taste of one of the world’s most fascinating cuisines.

Founded in November 1995 by Fawzi Harb, this is very much a family affair. He is still more than central to operations with his daughter on hand to passionately chat through all manner of Lebanese delights. A large deli counter greets you as you enter the shop filled to the rim with everything from green hummos (more on that later) to kibbe and moussaka. All of this is of course available to eat in and order by weight but also to box up and take away for home. In addition to that, the deli offers daily lunch boxes which provide a selection of the most popular cold deli items, a daily hot special that comes with rice and costs around £7, and a selection of wraps.

From those wraps, we tried the most popular, the chicken shawarma. This is of course a classic and it’s easy to see why it is such a popular order here too. It costs £5.50, notably at the high end of lunch wrap options, but offers a much more complex flavour profile than something you’d get from somewhere like Najar’s. The garlic sauce stands out more than anything else and is of course made in house.

Chicken shwarma wrap

We also tried a variety of deli items, starting with the new beetroot kibbe and the aforementioned green hommos pairing. The hommos is conventional but with kale blended in to add a fresh lightness that you wouldn’t normally get. It goes particularly well with the kibbe. Traditionally filled with lamb and onion, this vegan twist contains vegetables instead and is all the better for it. This adds a variety and allows the beetroot shell to shine in its own right.

Green hummus, falafel, and beetroot kibbe

Batata Harra are cubed potatoes that are fried alongside garlic and coriander. They are a great addition to the lunch box but do need to be paired with something else. The only other note here was that they could have been crispier — admittedly that softening of the shell is almost impossible to avoid when fried potatoes are served cold.

Vegetarian lunch box

Falafel are, of course, a staple of Middle Eastern cuisine and the homemade ones here are fairly classic. Slightly lighter than some, they are marked by the presence of more sesame flavours than you’d often get, helped by the use of seeds as well as sesame oil. More impressive though was the way that thet maintained its crispy exterior despite coming cold, unlike the earlier mentioned potatoes.

Moujadara was a completely new dish to me and is essentially a really simple mix of rice, lentils, fried onions, and a combination of other herbs and spices from the house mix. I’m a mild fried-onion obsessive but often think that rice and lentil dishes can ere on the side of blandness. In line with everything else at LB’s though, there was no danger of that and the herbs balanced the flavours of onion perfectly for a dish far far better than plain rice and a perfect counter to the spicy Mauhamara nut and chilli paste.

Spinach, Mousaka, and Mauhamara

Better than all of that though was, quite remarkably, the spinach. Regular readers of mine know that salad and salad leaves are always a focus of mine (to say the least!) and it is the simplicity of this dish that makes it great. Broiled with onions and another mix of Lebanese spices, it both has a flavour all of its own but also works well as a base for other items. It certainly elevated the Mousaka, which is served here with chickpeas. It’s an intriguing and traditional Lebanese version known as ‘Bizeit’ but for me, would be really taken to a better level if it were served warm. Clearly that isn’t the possible instore but taken home and heated could be a winner.

Sweets are, of course, here too. Baklawa are available with almonds, pistachios, or cashews, and this variety is certainly welcome. Usually, Baklawa is far too sweet for me, with the over-drenching of honey ruining the nutty flavour within. That is not a mistake made by LB’s with a much larger proportion of pastry. Unfortunately, this time it is that that dominates the cashew beneath but if you are willing remove a layer or two or are a big fan of filo then this is one for you. We also tried cashew fingers — it was nice to get something different from baklawa and these are much nuttier with a pleasing crunch.

Baklawa and cashew fingers

All in all, LB’s kind of does everything and does it all well. Any criticism is nit-picking and in terms of a value-focussed chance to check yet another world cuisine off your list of Oxford experiences, you can’t go far wrong. My tip? Go in and let yourself be guided! Order as many items as possible, find some favourites, and come back for quick lunch breaks or to stock up for a home feast. Summertown’s options are ever growing, from classic French, to tapas, and American BBQ,but through all of that, it is clear why LB’s has remained a staple.

Just as nice for thrice the price?: The international experience at Oxford

0

I would be lying if I said I hadn’t looked into getting adopted by my British relatives. Why? Well, as an Australian citizen, I have the poor luck of falling into the “overseas student” category when it comes to university fees. So much for being a member of the Commonwealth! If I could have successfully naturalised, I would stand to save a staggering £75,000 over the course of my degree. 

This figure comes from the difference between the annual fees for a PPE degree for home students and those for students hailing from abroad. While the former are capped by the government at £9,250, the latter are more or less subject to the vicissitudes of the market, where the current equilibrium is £35,080. For a subject like Psychology, Philosophy and Linguistics, the number is £44,240.

Now, the University has a professed commitment to inclusivity in both an international and financial sense. However, if we look a little closer, in light of the above disparity there is a contradiction in some of the University’s claims. Consider the following excerpts from the website:

  • “Oxford’s international profile rivals that of any university in the world, highlighted by the breadth and depth of its research collaborations and a truly global student body and academic staff.”
  • “Today, one third of our students, including 21% of undergraduates, are international citizens and come from over 140 countries.”
  • “​​Our ambition is to ensure that no one with outstanding academic potential is deterred from studying here because of their background, personal circumstances, or finances.”

Does this ambition really extend to the entirety of the student body? Of course, all the overseas students here are both willing and able to meet the financial demands one way or another. To get a broader perspective on the international experience at Oxford, I sat down with a few students to listen to their thoughts. 

Moving to university is a big step for anyone. For international students, it’s a massive step. No one can better testify to this than Jenni, a first-year PPList. Her journey to college was more daunting than most. Forget the 23-minute train ride from Reading, Jenni flew all the way from Sydney, Australia: “I came here alone two weeks before term started… I was walking up and down the High Street, no one was helping me…I knew no one.” Once term starts, one quickly becomes much too busy to be preoccupied with homesickness and whatnot, but those first few weeks can be especially isolating when home is half a world away.

Julia, an American PPEist coming from across the pond, discussed the additional travails she faced. On top of the canonical learning curves in time management, essaying and domestic duties, Julia spent her first few weeks in Oxford: “Getting phone plans, sorting out my visa, setting up a bank account… Stuff like that, where if things go wrong, this is actually a problem!” 

We also discussed the logistical implications of the (in)famously short terms and long vacations. My family is currently in Denmark, and while the solo Oxford to Paddington Station to Liverpool Station to Stansted airport to Copenhagen trip is quite the ordeal (with basically all my worldly possessions in tow!), it’s not impossible. In Jenni’s case, flying back and forth to Sydney three times a year is not viable, but the alternative is spending more on accommodation beyond the standard 27-week contract (she also noted that a 40-week contract is inconvenient for those students who are able to head home each vacation). There are also problems with moving in and out: “It’s so much effort, and they don’t give you as much storage as you need…I’ve had to store stuff in friends’ rooms, and lost stuff in the process of things being stashed about.”

The degree of culture shock one experienced was closely tied to the student’s previous international experience. Irene, a biologist at St Hilda’s who grew up in Australia and then Shanghai, completed sixth-form here in the UK, and recognises the head start this gave her when university began: “I learned about the culture, the people and how things work here… I feel like understanding the pop-culture here helps in communicating with people here and the other way around.” 

On the other hand, Mrinal, another first-year, was born and brought up in India, and we discussed the range of factors one had to acclimatise to in making the big jump to Oxford: “It was a totally new experience for me shifting from an Indian curriculum to a british one… The culture here is quite different, there are different tastes, different hobbies, different foods…I think the catering system needs to improve in order to better cater for international students.”

For most students, life inside Oxford is completely different to life outside Oxford. Cecilia, a second-year Engineer who has been an expat her whole life, emphasises this dichotomy: “It does sometimes feel like my life is split in two. Once I come to Oxford, I’m in Oxford; once I’m back in Paris, I’m in Paris, and there’s no oscillation between the two.”

Given how intense the term is, it can be nice to catch a break. For Julia: “A lot of times, it can seem like life in Oxford is everything…the way I escape that very intense lifestyle is coming back [to the US] and it’s really nice to put everything into perspective, in the sense that no matter what happens in the UK, I will always have this home.”

Throughout the interviews, the general consensus reached was that yes, there were additional logistics that needed consideration, but it was definitely worth it – it’s not unreasonable to say that going to the top university in the world is always worth it. The differences between the international and domestic experiences were much smaller than the similarities. The main point of contention was, as this article has been driving towards, the fees.

The financial requirements associated with tertiary education vary around the globe. On one hand, you have the US system, exorbitantly expensive. When I asked Julia about her thoughts on the overseas fees at Oxford, she notes: “For a lot of [Americans], going to school in the UK is the cheapest option. Even with the flights taken into account, it costs so much less for me to go to the UK… when we were looking at Harvard, it was around… three times as much for a single year.” On the other hand is the Danish system. I lived as a resident in Denmark for my last two years of high school. Had I chosen to go to one of the Copenhagen universities, not only would I have paid no tuition – not even in the form of a loan – I would have received the Statens Uddannelsesstøtte, or “state educational grant”. This grant, similar to the maintenance loan in the UK but again, non-repayable, adds up to around £600 a month. 

The Danish case is just one manifestation of the socialist policies for which the Scandinavian countries are known, and would likely nauseate truly free-market liberals. There is always a value tradeoff for any policy. In this case, it is equality and efficiency. 

I don’t think that the British government has any explicit responsibility towards subsidising or capping international fees, although there is certainly an argument to be made in favour of doing so. Most interviewees, for example, stated that they saw themself staying in the UK for at least a few years after their degree. Conversely, a recent article in The Times noted a potential brain drain occurring in Britain as “Private school pupils turn backs on Oxbridge to chase Ivy League places”. Making the UK a more financially viable destination for university would undoubtedly pay dividends in the long run by attracting bright students from across the world.

Government incentives aside, I wonder if a case couldn’t be made for the university itself to have a greater responsibility in promoting financial inclusivity. At the very least, I’m not sure the ambition “to ensure that no one with outstanding academic potential is deterred from studying here because of… finances” is quite compatible with the fact that the Student Loan option is unavailable to international students. Scholarships don’t provide a viable option either; as the website notes, numbers are “ very limited, which is why we encourage students to explore options for sourcing funding in their home country.” Australia, my home country, has a similar student loan scheme to the UK, but unfortunately it is only available for Australian students studying in Australia. 

The fact is, most international students rely on private finance. Everyone interviewed recognised the privilege of being able to afford to attend Oxford; Ibrahim, another first-year, mentioned that his parents “have been planning for these kinds of fees for our whole lives.” Mine have too, but the year-on-year increase of £6,000 – a roughly 20% increase, while the Consumer Price Index for the UK has measured annual inflation at 10.4% in January – is hard to swallow.

For every worthy student who is lucky enough to afford their place, one can’t help but think of those who aren’t so fortunate. Those students facing economic hardship, in both developed and developing countries, who have the intellectual means but lack the finances. There undoubtedly are comparable domestic cases, but this is mitigated by initiatives like the Crankstart Scholarship. For the international case, Cecilia argues – and it is hard to disagree – that admission is a case of merit conditional on financial viability: “It’s only the best from those that can afford it.”

Is there a solution? 

Assuming the government is unable to financially support these students for political and economic reasons, I believe there is still the possibility of recreating the student loan option independently. Think of a large – and yes, it would have to be large indeed – fund from which international students could take a loan to cover the cost of tuition, to be paid back in the future, adjusted for inflation. The University is quick to advertise the employability of its graduates, so I don’t see why such a fund couldn’t be self-sustaining once established.

 
This is what realising the ambition of admitting everyone with the requisite academic potential could look like. Unfortunately, it would require a considerable capital endowment. Ideally, it would be great to see the University put its money where its mouth is, but as Cecilia said “There’s only so much money to go around, and because it is so expensive for any single student to come here, the University does just not have the budget to send more than a handful of students here.” The alternative could be an extremely benevolent series of donations from alumni and other philanthropists who see the value in such a fund. Dear reader, if you are feeling especially benevolent today you could be the first to take this step!