Thursday 11th September 2025
Blog Page 185

Overworked and underpaid: testimonies of Oxford’s scouts

0

The kitchen was scrubbed this morning, but Pam’s* superior runs her fingers across the kitchen walls and holds them up to the light, then says to clean the walls again. I ask Pam about the rash above her wrist and she says it’s the detergent. The scouts I speak to take the early buses into Oxford. They have grandchildren. Some have lived in this country for 35 years, others fled armed conflicts in Eastern Europe to come to the UK. Some are not permitted smoking breaks and are terrified of picking up a call from their kids abroad, fearing that superiors might see them on the phone. 

Only two other British universities have equivalents of the scout system, where housekeeping has to navigate a hazardous student habitat to clean toilets and kitchens, make beds and hoover rooms, serve tea to guests over the vacation, and sometimes act as a welfare checkpoint. At other universities a rota in the kitchen determines who takes out the rubbish that week.

“Money is never enough”

Scouts (or ‘bedders’, as they are known at Cambridge) knock to collect trash and, at some colleges, enter unannounced. Many students find these awkward run-ins embarrassing or bothersome, and are quick to lash out at scouts, who didn’t make the rules. Cleaning the living space of routinely stressed students is a thankless job – and an underpaid one. 

 “[The] money is never enough”, Pam says to me when I ask why a 70-year-old scout with a bad knee can’t retire. Oxford Worker Justice is a student campaign that demands information from colleges about pay and other details in order to generate a ranking of colleges according to their adherence to the Oxford Living Wage (OLW). The OLW, at £10.50 at the time of inquiry earlier in the year, is a “liveable minimum pay” set by the City Council to reflect the high costs of living in Oxford. Eight colleges’ lowest wages were below the OLW and 16 colleges say they do not intend to increase wages to align with the OLW, which as of April is £11.35. Some colleges, including Christ Church and Balliol, have since told Cherwell that they will uplift salaries in line with the Oxford Living Wage this spring.

When Oxford Worker’ Justice requested information on wages in 2021, other colleges justified lower wages by saying staff had non-wage benefits like access to (public) parks or gifted chocolate at Christmas. Only ten colleges have an OLW accreditation, which is a scheme for employers to commit to pay the OLW. It should also be noted that colleges including Christ Church provide some monetary benefits for supplementary work including conference benefits. 

A decentralised system

The poor pay stems in part from the prevalence of subcontractors in hiring Oxford’s scouts. Most colleges use agency staff, with Keble and LMH topping the list of most agency staff employed. This reduces administration costs and makes hiring and firing more flexible, and scouts hired through agencies often experience unique challenges. Lucy, who works with Oxford Worker Justice, says that reporting to chains of authority in both college and the agency may make for a worse work environment. 

When her colleague for the building takes leave, a scout I speak to has to clean four floors instead of two without extra remuneration. There is no direct line through which to express grievances to employers as colleges are not their direct employer. Furthermore, the University does not regulate the hiring practices of colleges because colleges are “independent of the University and are independent employers”.  2021 statistics corroborate the job insecurity subcontracted workers face. Agency staff at Corpus Christi, at that time, rarely stayed in the job longer than three months. Even those who are still in a job are not guaranteed consistent work and pay, as some colleges still employ zero-hour contracts, so staff are left without work for weeks at a time.

Lucy says no college is breaking the law on the living wage, but many do not or cannot provide details on sensitive topics like whether they use agencies, or details of measures taken during the pandemic for health and safety. Oxford Worker Justice launched a petition during the pandemic in response to reports that during the lockdown college staff had to work without Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). Pam experienced this and says she was terrified to have to clean the bathroom a student with COVID was using. 

I ask Pam why in her years as a scout she hasn’t heard talk of unions. “They think there’s no point,” she says. Lucy from Oxford Worker Justice echoes this sentiment. She believes the college system “creates a different dynamic to other [universities] where there is one institution to put pressure on”. The lack of a centralised employer creates an insular environment so scouts have no wider channel of interaction with those at other colleges. Oxford Worker Justice used to run small groups at the now-closed East Oxford Community centre with the hope of directing workers to general unions like IWGB and UNISON that seek to represent college workers. Turnout to these meetings was, however, low. 

Isolation, fear and inequality

When I reach out to friends to get them to put me in touch with their scouts, a common problem is the language barrier. At some colleges less than 30% of the staff are British. A majority of workers at St Anne’s in 2021, for example, were EU citizens. An old Cherwell investigation reported of colleges such as Jesus asking scouts to use Anglicised names, claims that were later denied by the college. I’m told that a college worker who spoke at a rally claimed that the norm of targeting immigrants for jobs emerged because they are least likely to complain, and most likely to fear the repercussions of speaking up. Lucy says it is clear that in more ways than one, “the system is designed for it to be difficult for them to ask for more … to advocate for themselves”.

Up until the 70s, scouts at Oxford were called “servants”. I am struck by anecdotes about vomit in sinks, rotting food dripping through fridges, and Lucy tells me that overwhelmingly, “scouts just wish students just didn’t do sh*tty things that make their jobs more difficult”. An article in the Telegraph by a graduate argues that “the artificial bubble of college life at Oxbridge is perhaps unlike anywhere else in the world for how it compresses privilege and poverty”. Due to language barriers, memories of bad confrontations, and a sometimes fear-fuelled work environment, scouts may find it daunting to even tell residents how hard the students make their work. 

The pay gap at this world-renowned university between the yearly earnings of minimum wage workers (scouts, kitchen staff, porters, maintenance) and maximum wage employees (over £100K/year) will continue to grow if more colleges do not commit to the Oxford Living (subsistence) Wage. For scouts, Lucy suggests that “the knowledge [of better pay at other colleges] is enough to get that increase”. 

Scouts want fairer pay and better treatment. The system needs reform that favours people like Pam, who tells me that all she wants is “some bl**dy respect”. 

*name has been changed for anonymity

Charts created by Oxford Worker Justice

Correction 16/05/2023: Please note that the median salary Mansfield College pays for college cleaning staff is £22,672 (£10.90 ph) and the lowest hourly salary is £10.90.

Netflix and Scroll: Sound Familiar?

0

All findings are taken from the 31 responses to a survey that was released early Hilary Vac 2023.

Before I begin on my journey, exploring the depths of Oxford’s culture of procrastination, I would like to make a confession. This vac, I was supposed to write 2 essays, rewrite 2 collection essays, watch 10 Shakespeare plays and read the Prelude by Wordsworth (a total of 13 books). I spent this vac rewatching Friends for the 3rd time, finishing another fantasy book trilogy, sending self-tape auditions, keeping up with #escapril, baking and writing this article. I say this so that you know, when it comes to procrastination, I am highly experienced and I am, by no means, speaking as an outsider looking in. Because of this chronic issue, I thought that it would be appropriate for the beginning of Trinity Term, to reach out to fellow procrastinators and ask them about their experiences and also to share any advice that they might have that could help us.

The main point, however, is to say to all those who procrastinate, you are not alone. When given the options of 0-1, 2-3, 4-5 and 5-10 hours of procrastination, just over half of the responses to the survey claimed that they procrastinate 2-3 hours a day (56.7%) with no reports of people procrastinating between 0-1 hours. We all have a tendency to procrastinate.

This might not sound like a huge chunk of the day, but this is disregarding the hours of lectures, social commitments and classes we might have. 2-3 hours can feel like a lot with the endless string of things we have to commit to. So what do we do to span the time between being given the assignment and rushing to hand it in? The scene of the crime for most people who responded to the form is the bedroom:

This makes sense, because – despite the desks that most colleges so kindly provide for us – the pictures on the pinboards just look so cute and make us think of that time we spent in France and “oh! Where were the pictures for that again?” or “I wander how much a trip to Spain would cost” or “I should really reply to those messages” (unrelated to the train of thought but a present thought nonetheless”). Social media is also the leading contender as a method of procrastination with 20 out of the 31 responses saying that they use social media to procrastinate – especially scrolling. And your bed does just look so comfy and a perfect place to pursue all of these various trains of thought. Bonus: you’re nice and warm and not stressed! 

A few more fun ways of procrastination included cleaning, baking, and even making playlists. Methods of procrastination even vary if you’re just one person:

“Cleaning/tidying, chatting, doing other things I need to do instead of work, making playlists, lying in bed staring at the ceiling, crying”

Honestly, we are so creative in the ways we choose to procrastinate that “doing other things instead of doing work” really sums it up perfectly. Procrastination is such a beautifully diverse activity that can range in time taken and activities chosen so that we can spend as much time NOT doing work as possible. 

Despite this, 90% of responses also reported that they would say that their procrastination is an issue. So why do we procrastinate?

Simultaneously, 100% of the responses agreed that Oxford burns them out, which is where we can see a common denominator. Something that we can all agree on when we’re talking about the City of Dreaming Spires is that it is, whilst beautiful, VERY hard work. Ironically, being in an environment that’s so academically intensive, procrastination can make us feel so inadequate and we begin to lose faith in our academic ability.  

One response that echoed many others, encompassing the experience of how Oxford might fuel our procrastination was that they often procrastinate when “in situations of immense stress”. Although having some level of pressure might give a well-needed push in the right direction, the stress of our lifestyles is perpetual which means that even if you know that there is a deadline, this makes procrastination worse.

Another said that they are more likely to procrastinate “when I have a piece of work I’m not enjoying”. However, in this TED-Ed Video, they answer the question “Why you procrastinate even though it feels bad?”, they take a more psychological approach to answer why we subject ourselves to the endless cycle that is procrastination? The answer is that it’s because, for a lot of people, we care a lot about the task at hand which means we stress ourselves out and do our best to avoid it (because not trying means not failing) until it’s too late to do our best. This is more echoed by the response that they most procrastinate in situations “When I really care about the work and it’s important to me.”

This intensity causes a frustrating cycle of putting something off, and then being so behind on work that there’s no point in starting it at night when the day is finished so you might as well try in the morning but then it’s 3am and you’re sitting in your room, a 24 hour college library or a creepy computer room trying to finish the essay in time for your 9am tutorial which you know you’re going to be too exhausted to interact with anyway. A few responses also said that they often leave things too late and end up rushing things like essays, which, in turn, leads you to feel inadequate and not completing your best academic work. One person described how procrastination “ends up making my work so much more stressful than it has to be”. 

It also means that the standard of the work you submit goes down:

“I end up rushing work and submitting subpar essays, sometimes past the deadline”

There’s is something deeper in this observation, especially when we talk about Oxford students, who are often already perfectionists before we get here. There is something really terrifying about the aspect of trying your best in a piece of work and being told that it’s still not good enough. Maybe in an essay subject, you spend days researching and working on answering a question, only for your tutor to turn around and say they don’t like it. That possibility is always looming and that’s so disheartening. 

Procrastination means that you don’t give yourself enough time to finish the piece of work, you always have the excuse that you didn’t have sufficient time to do it and there’s no risk that your best work might not actually be good enough. The heavy workload that we are given in the first place lends itself to this cause because we become students that become used to churning out pieces of work that are not actually perfect and will probably not be your best work.

“In this case, it’s important to remember that you’re not procrastinating because you’re lazy, it’s a freeze/flight response from when you’re being put in a situation of intense stress.”

This was one of the best pieces of advice that was given by one of the respondees. This is especially important when we’re considering the role of perfection and the pressure to achieve it causing our procrastination getting worse. My own advice to you would be that this idea of academic perfection is completely artificial. There is always someone that’s going to be better than you at each thing that you strive to do but that’s okay and it doesn’t make your contributions to your subject/society/field any less important.

Some people also highlighted how your procrastination can be used as something helpful:  

“In these cases [when work is boring], use procrastination as a signifier for what you’re not enjoying but also what you probably need to concentrate more when trying to focus.”

In a university when we’re trained to research all topics of our field in depth, it’s helpful to look at procrastination in this way, especially for those of us who are given option papers, so that we can see, through our procrastination, the routes that we really don’t want to be pursuing.

Thankfully for me and, I hope, some of you, the respondees also offered a lot of practical advice. Whilst the bedroom draws you in with the comfort of a warm bed, for many people who responded to the form, going to the library is a popular way for place for them to go to stop procrastinating, or even planning study groups with friends. I can attest to the fact that being around other people who seem to be working so vigorously keeps me accountable for persevering in the work that I need to be doing and stops me from going onto Instagram on my laptop. This person highlighted how to keep yourself accountable in more ways than this:

“Commit to being in a public space where other people can see me, make lists detailing out my tasks, timetable in times to work and also to relax and see other people”

Surrounding yourself with people and making plans with them to study can give a bit of structure to your time and can also help to make sure you commit to leaving time to study because another person is involved. 

If you’re a bit more of an introvert and find it better to be on your own then some others advised the Pomodoro technique or “turn [your] phone off and focus on doing a small task to start! Once I have some momentum going then I might also be able to do the bigger tasks.”

A few of the responses also included people who had ADHD and they also had advice for others: “Try to plan things, remember to take my ADHD meds, use other people to hold me accountable” 

One way of using others to keep yourself accountable, especially if you have ADHD is “Body doubling (have someone around me so it motivates me to study).” Body-doubling is a self-help technique, popularly advertised for those who have ADHD, where someone anchor’s you to your task (by conducting it with you) to ensure you don’t get distracted.

One thing that I would advise against is to “motivate [yourself] through fear and panic”. This is especially important when we can see how a lot of people’s procrastination stems from their fear of imperfection. Using that same fear to push yourself is only going to perpetuate the cycle that we are working so hard to avoid. If you take anything away from this, please remember that you need to give yourself a break and not work yourself into burnout.

“Your brain needs a break, and even though some procrastination like scrolling is probably unhealthy for you, it’s also useful to not be constantly analyzing things or committing to projects (as you do in your degree). Just because you aren’t doing work doesn’t mean your time is wasted or you’re not being productive”

In many ways, procrastination is our brain’s way of saying that we’re overdoing it and that we need to give ourselves a break. This is your reminder to keep telling yourself:

“You’re not lazy and you’re not alone!! You work hard regardless.”

Even “treat yourself after [the work is] done” because you’ll be rewarding yourself for ensuring that you’ve worked hard and it will become something that is a bit less stressful.

Procrastination, whilst the bane of the Oxford education system, is actually something that we can use to our advantage. So, to all of my classmates, friends, and fellow procrastinators, please, take a moment to procrastinate this evening, crochet, bake cookies, reorganise your pin board and…

“Remember why you’re here and doing what you’re doing. Don’t let anything snowball and if you need to be in a moment of procrastination or a moment away from everything allow yourself to! Learn how you best get back on track and don’t keep it or any other pressures to yourself ❤️”

Russian ambassador says Ukrainian students “may return to their country”

0

Speaking at the Oxford Russian Club, the Russian Ambassador to the UK, Andrey Kelin, downplayed the brutality of Russian military action in Ukraine and said that refugees in Oxford who have fled the violence may return home if they want to, but would likely be conscripted into the Ukrainian forces.

Kelin, who is banned from entering Parliament’s Westminster estate, suggested that it is the responsibility of the West to stop supplying the Ukrainian armed forces with weapons before peace can come to Ukraine and refugees can permanently return to their home country. 

“We are not responsible”, Kelin said. “We are trying to diminish the size of the Ukrainian war machine […] either they can continue casualties, or they can stop immediately.” The ambassador continually presented the origins of the conflict in Ukraine as relating to the emergence of “militant [Ukrainian] nationalism” and the suppression of the Russian language. 

When asked about possible resolutions to the conflict, Kelin said that the last time there had been “sensible” negotiations between the two countries was in April 2022, as the team sent by Ukraine had been “prepared for a compromise, especially in security”. But, he claimed, these negotiations had stopped suddenly on the back of US pressure and after the Bucha massacre, which he suggested might have been “artificially staged”. 

As documented by the UN Human Rights Monitoring Mission, 458 bodies, at least 19 of which were children, were recovered from Bucha in April 2022. The massacre came as part of the Russian effort to occupy the town which lies just outside Kyiv, and involved the summary execution of at least 73 civilians. 

Kelin has also been criticised for previously denying that Russia bombed a theatre in Mariupol housing civilians. The Associated Press reported that 600 people died as a result of the strikes on the theatre. A maternity ward, containing children, was also the subject of air strikes in Mariupol. The governor of the Donetsk Oblast said that 17 people were injured in the bombing, including women in labour.

In response to questions concerning the future of Russia’s geopolitical status within Europe, Kelin said that “Russia is a European country”. While “temporarily [Russia] will have to rely on China”, he seemed sure that “sooner or later we will have to reconcile our differences”, although Russia “will not take the initiative” on this. Such a reconciliation would rely on “another European architecture” which would consider “the interests of all on the continent, not just NATO and European Union members”.

The Russian Club event was met with protest from demonstrators who congregated outside the venue, many of whom were draped in the Ukrainian flag. Several held signs and banners, one of which read “Kelin represents murderers”. One protester, Anna Hope, denounced “giving a platform” to Kelin and the Russian government. She also spoke about raising the visibility of the war in Ukraine for those who are not personally connected to it, worrying that “people have learned to tune out news about Ukraine”. 

During the talk, the ambassador continually brushed over the total 9000 civilian deaths that have occurred since the Russian invasion of Ukraine, parrying the suggestion that civilians are being targeted in Ukraine with a reference to NATO bombing in Serbia in 1999. Furthermore, Kelin claimed that Russia was “now rebuilding parts of Ukraine that have been destroyed”, and would “rebuild all areas that stay attached to Russia”.

The event took place in the back living room of a house in North Oxford after two previous venues, a college and a church, cancelled. Kelin was accompanied by his own security detail and there was a police presence outside of the house. A member of the Oxford Russian Club told Cherwell that they thought forums like this with open discussion are very important and expressed frustration that the university community was not more supportive.

The University’s Graduate Scholarship Scheme for Ukrainian Refugees matriculated 26 postgraduate Ukrainian students in October 2022 and plans to fund 18 further scholarships in the next academic year. Oxford city has also welcomed hundreds of refugees since the Russian invasion on 24th February 2022. 

Image Credit: Katy Okuneva for FAR Oxford

The Perfect Tory? Rishi Sunak’s tutors reveal his student persona

0

Breaking news: Sunak hasn’t changed much. It’s the late nineties, Lincoln College is awaiting the arrival of an earnest, economically and socially conservative PPEist. Enter Rishi Sunak. Rumour has it that Sunak started his Lincoln years as a perfect Tory, and has remained that way. As is seen in his giddy Commons speeches, addressing striking workers and refugee policy is all still a bit of an academic exercise to Sunak. 

I contacted two of Sunak’s tutors from his time as an undergraduate studying PPE at Lincoln College (1998-2001). With the aim of understanding his head-school-boy parliamentarian manner, my plans were scuppered when both tutors pleaded the fifth under the laws of respectful “privacy” and “confidentiality”. 

Michael Rosen, now professor at Harvard’s Department of Government and then Senior Tutor, even offered an analysis of why Brits have been so hooked on knowing what politicians used to be like. Consolation? Hardly. Rosen stated “I think it’s unfortunate the way that people in Britain look back on what someone was like at University — even, indeed, at school — as if that defined who they are many years later.” 

Yet, surely, to get to the crux of contemporary politics, there is nothing more valuable than peering into the nascent Conservative mind. 

The unintelligible and cataclysmic mini-budget of Kwasi Kwarteng and Liz Truss at the end of last year was explained by their university beginnings. As Ian Hislop told Politics Joe, Truss and Kwarteng were having the same fun and games that they had been having in their Oxford JCRs. 

Tracing the student history of our leaders is precisely what must be done to understand just how politicians masterminded their politics. 

Rosen’s words suggested that, “in twenty years time”, I – and the other young people still left reeling from the question of just how the Conservative government has been through three Prime Ministers in under six months and still believes it’s fit to represent the voice of a people – will appreciate his hope that we cut politicians some slack. But, in twenty years, Sunak’s tenure may well have secured the slow and painful death of the NHS, the welfare state, and the state educational system. Entirely privately educated and now sitting on a staggering £730m (including the estate of his wife, Akshata Murty), it seems that his student years were the ones that nipped any chance of equitable, empathetic policy-making in the bud.

Sunak studied PPE but dropped Philosophy after his first year (perhaps unsurprisingly, say what you will). Professor Max de Gaynesford oversaw some of his first-year learning – Logic and Descartes, as de Gaynesford told Cherwell. No one could deny that Sunak is a man of logic though humane thoughtfulness does not seem to be a strongpoint – take Braverman’s secure position in Cabinet despite a history of ludicrous policy-making. 

De Gaynesford made it clear, however, that Sunak worked hard: “his seriousness, intelligence and hard work were reflected in his First” and he “belonged to a particularly committed PPE cohort who were a joy to teach – there were I think seven Lincoln Firsts in PPE in his year.” On paper, Sunak had his target and reached it. Whether this was an ethically and morally sound target is a fact lost to time. Though, efficiency and targeted action is exactly what it takes to become an oligarch, as George Monbiot described the Premier in conversation with Politics Joe. Plato would agree: oligarchy is the perfect answer for the money-hungry. Not that Sunak would know.

One of Sunak’s targets realised at Oxford was reportedly Number 10 itself. Michael Rosen told Tatler, when Sunak became Chancellor of the Exchequer in 2020, that “fellow students said he wanted to become Conservative prime minister. But I don’t think anyone took that too seriously.” 

In the same piece for Tatler, it is recorded that “his luck has given him the politics of the head boy”. In Office, at Oxford, in the Oxford University Investment Society and at Lincoln College, Sunak followed through on this reputation. Sunak was a mouse at Oxford: his presence was largely unnoticeable, but a few crumbs appeared when he left. During his time here Sunak made his way up the ranks of the Oxford University Investment Society (OUIS). Term cards show he was Treasurer in Michaelmas 1999 and became President of the Society at some point in the following two terms, but there is no evidence of him from Michaelmas 2000 onwards. The OUIS leaflets have an abundance of advertisement from Goldman Sachs, so it wouldn’t be surprising if he secured his placement there and promptly left the society. 

A stickler for the rules irrespective of general good-doing. It was said, probably as a result of this, that “outside of Lincoln College Sunak had no reputation…he was a nobody, much like Blair.” Indeed, following a dusty afternoon of Cherwell-archive-raiding, I felt I had uncovered nothing on Sunak. Other than that he was a “grayman”, a non-entity at Oxford, as the Union librarian told Cherwell

Again, Goldman Sachs advertisements filled the Rishi Sunak-shaped void in the Cherwell archives. Sunak left Oxford with a position with the bank in 2001. He didn’t leave the University with quite the same tarnishes as the other chums of Johnsonian Oxford, just a steady, bureaucratic job. He fulfilled the prophecy that his peers had for him as told to Tatler: Sunak’s a “nerdy teetotaller who was just very clearly going into business.” Rishi Sunak’s time at Oxford nourished the fledgling Conservative’s thoroughness, money-focus and, well, dullness. And following his eventful Oxonian predecessors, it appears this was and still is perfect Tory material.

A Beginner’s Guide to Being Single

0

When my relationship ended over a year ago, I was so good at the breakup. I did everything right. I cried (a lot). I thought about texting him (but didn’t). I watched some awful rom-coms (young Matthew McConaughey, anyone?). I did face masks with my friends and ate ice cream, and for a long time, I really thought my heart would never recover. Of course, as it turns out, this is just how everyone feels after a breakup: I wasn’t the first person to feel like that, and I won’t be the last.

Time passed. I dedicated my newfound time to my friendships, my hobbies (all cards on the table: I row), and my degree. I now look back on what could have been one of my worst times as one filled with memories made with my greatest friends. The novelty of singleness led to a hot(-tish) girl summer (although falling short of the Lily-James-as-young-Donna vac of my dreams). I went on dates. I met new people. But as quickly as it came, the novelty wore off and the reality set in: the dating scene at Oxford is awful. 

It didn’t help that I have no idea how to date. My last relationship all but happened to me during sixth form when a guy I got on with like a house on fire and eventually fell in love with came along to begin our on-and-sometimes-off relationship. Sure – there are worse problems to have, but I’m convinced that I’m not the whole problem here. I’m not too proud to tell you I’ve tried dating apps, and they’re a waste of time at best. And yet, meeting someone in person seems like a romantic notion now confined to late-noughties rom-coms. Most people who have tried dating here have had similar experiences. Like them, in the process of exploring the dating scene Oxford has to offer, I have become disillusioned with the great parts about being single; I became one of those people who is far too often talking about how they miss being in a relationship. But I’m a better feminist than that – I’m sure of it. 

If you’re wondering why this has been on my mind so much recently, it comes back to a conversation I had at a formal a while ago with the boyfriend of a close friend of mine. 

“I was really intimidated by you when I first met you, you know.” He told me. 

This surprised me. I didn’t think I was intimidating.

He continued enthusiastically. “Yeah! You’re really intimidating! Like, you seem to have your shit together, and you call me out if I do something wrong – you can be a bit scary sometimes.” He then proceeded to ask all of our guy friends who sat around the table, who confirmed that I was actually very intimidating before they knew me, and that I would therefore never ever date again.

The feminist part of me was going, maybe you should be intimidating. After all, aren’t all the things he listed good things? But a not insignificant part of me – the part which was told I was ‘bossy’ instead of ‘confident’ growing up – felt overwhelmingly frustrated that I couldn’t just be a bit together and self-assured and not intimidate guys I know with it.

So this is the real issue: I might miss some parts of being in a relationship, but I do not want to change myself, to become less good at what I’m doing, to enjoy the things I like less, to take up less space, just to date again. I do not want to lower my standards either, or to expect less of any romantic interests. But from what I can tell, if a relationship was really what I wanted, then I would have to settle or change some of these things. And given that I have no intention of doing that (nor, I think, do I want a relationship that badly), I’m going to remind myself of all of the reasons that I am lucky to not be in a relationship at this point in my life. And there is so much to love – it’s just about finding it. I can’t be the only one who’s not great at being single yet. But I’ll get there.

Oxford University awarded University of Sanctuary status

0

The University of Oxford has received an award from the Universities of Sanctuary for its continued commitment to helping those who have been forcibly displaced around the world. 

Oxford is one of 25 universities across the country to have been awarded University of Sanctuary status. They make up a network of higher education institutions supporting people seeking sanctuary.

The University of Oxford follows Mansfield and Somerville Colleges which were awarded College of Sanctuary status in 2021 after establishing fully funded Sanctuary Scholarships for postgraduate students. 

Oxford has been recognised for its Refugee Studies Centre (founded in 1982) and Refugee-Led Research Hub (launched in 2021). More recently, the University’s Ukraine Scholarship scheme has added to its history of offering scholarships to refugees. 

The University has been able to offer scholarships to refugees and other forced migrants since 2016. It began the Refugee Academic Futures scheme this academic year to provide scholarships for graduates. 

The University of Sanctuary award heralds renewed investment in helping refugees. Under its new Oxford Sanctuary Committee, Oxford will now deliver an integrated programme of scholarships, support for students from displacement backgrounds and for the Oxford branch of Student Action for Refugees.

University of Sanctuary Coordinator, Maryam Taher said “we look forward to the University building on its positive work, and developing even closer links with local refugee communities and support groups.”

She continued, “the support of the University in welcoming those seeking sanctuary is vital to ensuring the UK offers a safe and supportive environment for those in need at times of crisis.”

Committed to inclusivity, the Oxford Sanctuary Community orchestrated the city of Oxford’s first Sanctuary Fair to connect refugees, students and locals held at the Town Hall on 11 May.

‘Kitchens, Drag Racing, and The Cure’ – boygenius, ‘the record’ album review

0

Since its release in January 2023, boygenius’ the record has collected perfect scores from DIY, NME, and Rolling Stone, setting the band up for The Tour this summer and landing them a set at this month’s Coachella. Compared to the ache and emotional purge of the 2018 self-titled boygenius EP, this full-length album represents a fading of anger and a confidence found in healing from past mistakes. the record is a masterclass in learning to understand your own and others’ emotions, celebrating above all the power of friendship (yes, the type of friends who make out in short films directed by Kristen Stewart). 

Through boygenius, the boys – Julien Baker, Phoebe Bridgers, and Lucy Dacus – resist the cruel reduction to the ‘sad girl music’ narrative so often pushed onto them as individual artists. The trio take their name from the “archetype of the tortured genius”, wishing to channel in their own lives and music the confidence of the male artist who has been “told since birth that their every thought is not only worthwhile but brilliant”. This album both embodies this spirit – urging us to “be the boygenius” – whilst challenging its toxicity by portraying the true experiences and difficulties encountered by each artist along the way. ‘Emily I’m Sorry’ conveys Phoebe Bridgers’ feelings of guilt towards a past love, Emily Bannon (the breakup of their polyamorous relationship resulted in grooming allegations and a messy defamation lawsuit against third member of the relationship, Chris Nelson). 

Essential to boygenius’ unique sound is the extraordinary blending of voices – stripped down to a cappella in the record’s first track ‘Without You Without Them’, a texture first demonstrated in the EP with ‘Ketchum, ID’. Through harsh panning and raw ambience, ‘Without You Without Them’ evokes the intimate vision of the three women gathered around a single microphone, gently harmonising to the fluid rhythms of Lucy Dacus’ lyrics . With the almost-familiar, swaying metre of some old forgotten tune, ‘Without You Without Them’ is a tender celebration of the folk and the feminine – a recognition of past generations, grateful for how things have turned out despite how things may have once been. 

The album’s second track, $20, throws us straight into a punchy, determined groove that somehow feels equally youthful and volatile, changing between a 7 and 5 beat pattern that allows a decisive punctuation of Julien Baker’s phrases. Building to a screaming climax and underpinned by shuffling, polyrhythmic drumming, this song’s vocals are reminiscent of Bridgers’ ‘I Know The End’ or Dacus’ ‘Night Shift’ – a pure and unadulterated catharsis of emotion. 

The trademark production style of each artist is present throughout all of the album, but none more obviously than the waterlogged, echoing drums of Bridgers’ 2020 album Punisher in the tracks ‘Emily I’m Sorry’ and ‘Revolution 0’. The summer radio single of the album has to come in the form of ‘Not Strong Enough’. With references to kitchens, drag racing, and singing along to The Cure; framing self-aware, pessimistic lyrics in an upbeat, pop-rock form; this song is one to drive to with the windows down. 

the record confidently declares its influences. It includes  a portion of Leonard Cohen’s ‘Anthem’ on his namesake’s song, and even credits Paul Simon as inspiration for ‘Cool About it’ (a track which uses the melody from Simon and Garfunkel’s ‘The Boxer’). But the most striking interpolation (in my opinion, the best song on the album) is inspired by boygenius’ own repertoire. It comes in the form of the album’s final track, ‘Letter to an Old Poet’ – an allusion to the title and content of one of Dacus’ favourite reads (Rainer Maria Rilke’s ‘Letters to a Young Poet’). This song brings together past, present, and future – it reprises the lyrics of popular track from the EP, ‘Me and My Dog’ into a crushingly hopeful expression of emotional growth, sending the finished album out into the world with a reminder of where boygenius came from, and where it may be going. Bridgers’ weary opening verses are met by the determined supporting vocals of Baker and Dacus – she begins to sing boldly and unapologetically, remarking “I’m better than you / And you should know that by now”. At the culmination of the song, instead of wanting to be “emaciated”, as in the matching lyrics from ‘Me and My Dog’, Bridgers sings that she is ready to be “happy” – the capacity for which she might not yet have, but decides to pursue. 
Listeners who have the vinyl LP release of the record are treated to the exclusive experience of an early locked groove on the final word of this album (“waiting”) – a deliberate effect that sums up the journey towards hope that this album represents and brings the artists physically into the room with us, reassuring the listener that they are not alone. the record is undoubtedly a spring album, emerging from the bitter winter of the EP with a somewhat tentative confidence that propels their sound towards the summer of warmth, hope, and growth. boygenius urges us to deeply understand ourselves and those around us and to let go of pain when we are ready, revealing to us that although past wounds can and will begin to heal, we cannot heal them alone.

“Let’s not be a bystander. Let’s actually do something”: In conversation with British Red Cross CEO, Michael Adamson CBE

0

Mike Adamson is Chief Executive Officer at the British Red Cross. He will step down later this year having served for over eight years as CEO and four years as managing director. Mike was appointed CEO in 2014 and has led the organisation during multiple humanitarian responses including the terrible Grenfell Tower fire, UK terrorist incidents, the coronavirus pandemic and the Ukraine conflict. Mike has an MPhil in Economics from the University of Oxford. He first worked as a management consultant, then in a variety of roles for the NHS and in the charity sector for the Royal National Institute for Deaf People and the British Red Cross.

Evans: What inspired you to apply to lead the British Red Cross

Adamson: The Red Cross is a movement. Every country in the world has a Red Cross or Red Crescent Society. They all sign up to a set of principles around humanity, impartiality and neutrality, inspired by the actions of someone we would now call a social entrepreneur, Henri Dunant, from the horrors he saw at the Battle of Solferino in 1859. After seeing the carnage on the battlefield, Henri Dunant said two things: ‘Wouldn’t it be amazing if in every country in the world, there were neutral, impartial volunteers ready to provide help, to whoever needs it, whichever side of the battle, whatever their gender, whatever their ethnicity, whatever their religion.’ and ‘When people go to war there should be some rules.’ Henri Dunant advocated for what became the Geneva Conventions. They are still as relevant today as they were 150 years ago. That was what inspired me. It was the opportunity with one of the biggest brands in the world to be able to make a difference in a way that is both local and global. It is an incredible privilege to play a part in the organisation and then to lead it. 

Evans: What have been the highlights of his time with the British Red Cross?

Adamson: When I see the work, we do on the ground. Three weeks ago I was in Turkey seeing the response to the earthquake in Turkey and Syria. I’m incredibly proud of the fact that we mobilised an appeal within a couple of hours of the earthquake through which we raised £35 million. Our partner the Turkish Red Crescent is doing an incredible job. They are feeding 1.5 million people a day. It is just on an extraordinary scale. They are providing psycho-social support to people traumatised by the loss of loved ones, the loss of their homes, and their livelihoods. To be able to play a part in that is just fantastic. That sense of the movement, and then to work on the issues that are so pertinent today. Our strategy is based around three big causes: people in emergencies, people who are displaced and people who fall between the gaps in the health and social care system. 

You look at the challenges that we face as a nation. The whole attitude to for example migration, refugees and asylum seekers. People coming across the Channel on boats. We have a really important role to play both in providing practical support to people in these defining moments at their lowest ebb but also in putting the case for a much more human approach to policy. It means that people start from a position of kindness, being inclusive, being tolerant, and wanting to help people. We do things, but we stand for something more in terms of our values and that is why we call ourselves a movement. The highlights are being able to be a part of that and to speak up when you know things could be so much better if we told the story differently.

Evans: Could you explain the fundamental principles of the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement?

Adamson: There are seven fundamental principles: Humanity, Impartiality, Neutrality, Independence, Voluntary Service, Unity and Universality. All seven are important. I think the most important are:

Humanity: We are here to help people without judging them, we support them because they are in need.  We do not make any judgment about how they got there but we do try and learn from it.

Impartiality: Just as I’ve described on the battlefield, we help whomever you are, whatever side of a cause you are on, whatever your gender, religion, or nationality.

Neutrality and independence: We will not get involved in political controversies where they affect our ability to provide support to people. For example, when the Red Cross is providing support to people in Syria, we won’t criticise the Syrian regime. We have to be neutral in order to cross the front line. Both sides of a conflict have to trust us. That is very difficult. When the International Red Cross visit prisoners of war in shocking conditions. We provide practical assistance, food parcels, and medication. We will not comment publicly on the conditions in prison. Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International do a really important job, they will tell the world about the conditions in those prisons. That’s not our job. The most important thing we do is to provide a report to the authorities. Our neutrality is what then allows us to go back and provide help the second, the third time. Our neutrality means that we can return to very difficult situations because we haven’t commented publicly on them. That can play out in the UK as well, where in our work with refugees and asylum seekers we will comment on how policy is making people more or less vulnerable, but we won’t do personal attacks on the Home Secretary or ministers or the government. We just present the evidence, and we bear witness to what we see. For us the humanitarian imperative is critical. We walk a tightrope between our neutrality and our independence.

These principles we live by. What is incredibly inspiring to me is that I can go all over the world and meet volunteers in Sierra Leone or northern Syria, and they will be talking about the fundamental principles and what they mean to them. Extraordinary.

Evans: How does the British Red Cross uphold the principle of Impartiality when it comes to controversial issues for instance the UK government’s Illegal Migration Bill?

Adamson: We will bear witness to what we see on the ground, and we will offer opinions on how government policy could be improved. There is a big difference between operating in the UK as a 24/7 democracy, however flawed, and Syria… In Syria, you stay silent, at least in public, because it would be dangerous to do anything else and might jeopardise our ability to provide assistance. You just try to provide humanitarian assistance. In the UK we have made it clear and presented evidence why we don’t think the ‘stop the boats’ policy will work. It misses a bigger picture of what’s happening in the world. There’s so much confusion both in government and amongst the public about who these people are. 70% or 80% of the people who come across in boats are coming from Eritrea, Sudan, Syria and Afghanistan. 80%+ of them make successful asylum claims. That’s not because we’re so warm and welcoming but it is just that they have a case.

Evans: I was keen to find out whether the British Red Cross’s assistance for refugees and asylum seekers is mainly for those coming to the UK or if substantial resources are allocated abroad.

Adamson: It is both. We are the largest independent provider of support to refugees and asylum seekers in the UK. We are bigger than any of the specialist agencies because we can mobilise more funding. Internationally we are often supporting people who are displaced as a result of conflict or climate change across Africa and the Middle East in particular but also in places like Bangladesh. Sadly, what determines how much we can do is dependent upon how much money we have raised. In Ukraine, we have managed to raise a considerable sum of money to support the people who are displaced both in the country and in neighbouring countries. In Bangladesh when the initial crossing of people across the border from Myanmar happened, again we were able to raise a lot of money. That money has tailed off and some of our support has had to tail off as a result. The tragedy of these situations is that it is not a level playing field. Arguably, the biggest crisis in the world right now is the food crisis in East Africa, Somalia, parts of Kenya and Ethiopia and yet we have not been able to raise the profile of that emergency and raise large amounts of money for it and we have not been able to provide as much support as we would have liked.

A Ugandan Red Cross volunteer. Image credit: IFRC/Corrie Butler

Evans: A really significant development on your watch has been the British Red Cross partnerships including with the NHS and the Voluntary and Community Sector Emergency Partnership (VCS EP). Could you talk in more detail about these initiatives?

Adamson: Partnerships are critical to us. They come in different shapes and forms. Our partnership with the NHS is around the interface between hospital and home. A significant proportion of people in hospital (sometimes up to 30%), are actually people that are medically fit to go home. Furthermore, some of the people who go to an A&E department don’t need an A&E doctor, they need support to help them with their mental health issues, drug and alcohol problems or a chaotic home situation. We get alongside those people and help them to return home safely, support them and foster a sense of agency in their life. This also helps the NHS because it means resources can be focused on the patients who need clinical support.

Another kind of partnership came out of the learning from the Grenfell Tower fire, where we responded, in the rest centre that was set up as part of the local resilience plan. However, local mosques, churches and youth centres also opened up in the early hours of that terrible Wednesday morning – and they would never have seen themselves as emergency responders in normal circumstances. It made us realise that we needed partnerships with a whole range of community organisations, as well as with local authorities and others. Now we host, and I co-chair, the VCS Emergency Partnership, which has more than 250 member organisations, 70% of which are local, who have signed up to work together to be better prepared for future emergencies. We have a programme to develop training and skills and build relationships for when an emergency takes place so you are not trying to work out who your partners are at the height of the emergency. When you look at the combination of the impact of climate change, terror attacks, and other kinds of emergencies, it is more likely there will be UK emergencies in the future, the risks have gone up, and the risk of pandemics has gone up significantly. We all need to get better prepared. We are working closely with the government in that space to strengthen the nation’s resilience strategies.

Evans: How did the British Red Cross help people affected by the coronavirus pandemic?

Adamson: We did huge amounts of work both in the UK and around the world. From food distribution and private food parcels here in the UK to providing cash. We were able to mobilise funds from our corporate and individual donors to create a cash fund that we could then get to people who had no income, no savings and no recourse to public funds. Refugees, asylum seekers, people in the gig economy, women fleeing domestic violence at home. We were providing support for people to get cash through a network of more than 200 referral partners so that they could buy a SIM card for their phone or food. We also ran a national support line. We were doing vaccination support. We ran some really innovative and award-winning campaigns around vaccine hesitancy. We grew our presence on TikTok. Also reaching out to some groups who were not coming forward. For example, people with uncertain migration status didn’t want to come forward for vaccination because they were worried that they would then be on official records which might leave them more vulnerable. We did so much in terms of helping connect people to the vaccination centres. Internationally it was similar, with the economic support of cash and then helping people to get vaccinated. It was one of the most challenging periods in my time as CEO.

Evans: What assistance is the British Red Cross providing to those impacted by the Ukraine conflict?

Adamson: We have raised over £180 million through the generosity of the British public, corporates and trusts. We have been working very closely with the Ukraine Red Cross since 24 February 2022 when the conflict started, to provide food, psychosocial support and cash since the Ukrainian economy has collapsed. In the conflict areas in the east of Ukraine, we are involved through the International Red Cross in the rehabilitation of water and electricity supplies. We have just supported the Winterization Programme because it gets incredibly cold in Ukraine and people lost their electricity and gas supplies. We are supporting the neighbouring countries in Poland, Romania and Moldova where the Red Cross in each of those countries is also supporting people. When Ukrainian refugees arrive here in the UK, we meet them at airports to welcome and help guide them through the Home Office systems or local authorities and provide cash support to help get them started. We are doing an enormous amount.

Evans: What advice would Mike give to Oxford students who want to support the British Red Cross?

Adamson: We would love it if students at Oxford wanted to come together and form a Red Cross group. The Red Cross is a movement that enables people to show their humanity and their solidarity. The principles and practical work of the Red Cross in helping people have never been more needed. Telling the story is really, really important. We support people at some of the defining moments in their lives when all seems lost. Sadly, I think there are going to be more people who are more vulnerable in the years to come. It is important that we remember our kindness to one another and our mutuality and that we act on that. Let’s not be a bystander – let’s actually do something.

For more information about the British Red Cross, go to https://www.redcross.org.uk

SU votes to ban Oxford Union from freshers fair

0

Oxford’s Student Union (SU) has passed a motion to cut financial ties with the Oxford Union, with 78.1% of those present voting in favour. This will likely prevent the Oxford Union from having a stall at the freshers’ fair and is likely to have an impact on new membership signups. 

As the Oxford Union is not a student society, they are required to pay for a commercial stall at the SU’s annual freshers’ fair. According to the SU, this is “the primary situation where the two organisations overlap and interact”.

The motion resolved to “cease any and all commercial and financial relationships between the Oxford Union and SU” until the mandate expires in three years. The SU does have an Ethical Code of Practice for its commercial activities, according to which it “should take all practically possible steps to ensure the organisations they engage with for commercial purposes are committed to minimising their negative impact on the environment and the communities they operate in”. 

The motion stipulates that the Student Council believes the Oxford Union should be able to “carry out its principles without creating a toxic environment which seems to encourage bullying, harassment, racial profiling, and a systemic abuse of power”. However, since the Oxford Union is a Private Member’s Club, it is not under the jurisdiction of the university and the SU is “unable to properly check Oxford Union matters… which affect students”. 

In areas where the SU lacks direct influence, the motion highlighted that “they still have a duty to lobby for change”, or, if unsuccessful, take “necessary actions to safeguard all members of the Oxford student community”. The passing of the motion mandates the VP Welfare & Equal Opportunities and VP Access & Academic Affairs to review the SU’s relationship with the Oxford Union.  

The Union told Cherwell: “The Union offers unique opportunities to its members, which range from meeting world leaders, to partaking in our debates, and joining us in our social events. The University’s compliance policy indicates that ‘free speech is the lifeblood of a university’, a principle that is upheld by the Oxford Union. 

“It is unfortunate that many of the claims made on the motion are not factually accurate, and merely represent the views of a minority of the student body.”The possibility of turning the motion into a procedural motion was also discussed, which would have enabled all eligible members to vote, rather than just those present in person or online. A cause of concern, however, was that the list of eligible voters might be outdated, as the list was not updated since last term. Ultimately, 23 out of 29 present members (not including abstentions) voted against this. 

Other concerns raised about the Oxford Union in the motion included the Oxford Union’s reliance on unpaid “vac days”, which the motion described as “exploitative”. The high cost of membership was also described as “antithetical to the SU’s commitment to access”. 

Clay Nash, the motion’s seconder, told Cherwell: “I hope that it sets a standard of accountability for the actions of Private Members Clubs, like the Oxford Union, who do not fall within the jurisdiction of the University’s regulatory bodies.”

According to the motion, whilst “strong action” by the SU might “provide an impetus for the Oxford Union to improve itself for its members in the Oxford community”, the exact actions will be discussed at a later date. Jade Calder, VP Access & Academic Affairs and the motion’s proposer, told the Student Council meeting she believes that “the motion in itself, on a symbolic level, is a good start”.

Freedom to hate? Why the Oxford Union’s obsession with controversial speakers must end

0

Only last term, in the article “Dear Oxford Union: what was the point of that?” Jack Twyman made a great point. For members of the LGBTQ+ community, how can it be right, in a space that they can reasonably expect to be inclusive, that individuals should be put to the stand, put on trial to defend their rights against transphobes and homophobes? Having a debate or speaker along such lines seems to have become a staple of the union term card. Quite why is up for debate, but it seems that in an era of sensationalism, the Union aims to bring in as much controversy each term under the guise of so-called freedom of speech.

Freedom of speech, of course, is something that the Oxford Union rightly champions. However, they often seem to breach the boundary between allowing freedom of speech and providing a platform to members of society who have rightly been banished from the mainstream due to their backwards views. Speech that actively harms or incites violence against minority groups has no place at our University. Should we really welcome those who make members of our community feel unsafe? I would like to think not. 

In a recent piece for Cherwell (Freedom of speech in 2023: Why the Oxford Union will never cancel controversial speaker) a Union member argued that we should go ‘into the spaces that oppose it [the trans community] the most’ in order to challenge them, a point in which I disagree with. The problem with this point is that it isn’t what the Union does. To the Union: this university should be a space for all its students and staff to feel welcome and safe, and you make it so that they are not. You are not going to them, you are inviting them to come to us, in many ways presenting to your members and the world that either you do not take their struggle seriously or outright don’t support them in the first place. Nothing forces students to turn up to the event. But should they not at least feel safe in a space that many have paid £300 to join?

Call me a hypocrite for making a criticism like this and yet still being a member. I think a lot of those who join the union do so with the promise of seeing incredible speakers, before quickly becoming disillusioned due to its toxic culture and grating politics. The addition of homophobic and transphobic speakers to such a mix doesn’t exactly make the union a more appealing space. 

The author also recognises that ‘defending one’s right to exist is awful’. Why on earth does the Union put people in such a position then? I would also challenge the idea that this is the only place these questions can be accessed. We live in a more connected society than ever, and the internet and social media mean that more than ever it is impossible to escape the worst aspects of society. Maybe in the past it was relevant for the Union to provide space, where the world was not so interconnected, and as such there really was no other place to engage with and challenge such views. However, nowadays it seems impossible to spend more than a few minutes on the internet without being met with a case of discrimination or bigotry.  

The University’s staff and student bodies have also clearly and resoundingly rejected the invitation of Stock to speak at the Union. At the time of writing, there is a growing number of colleges passing JCR motions condemning the decision. An Oxford Trans+ pride event has also been announced for the day of the talk by the LGBTQ+ society, in cooperation with other activists and other local organisations. This is the sort of action that we should be proud of. Defiance in the face of adversity. An unwillingness to back down when the rights of our friends and peers are called into question. And the sensible and mature way in which we are able to handle such situations, when those who have caused the controversy can do nothing but call us ‘Absolute babies’.

The thing is, there are so many inspirational public figures out there who I can guarantee would be of much greater interest to the student body, and who do not question our peers’ rights. In less than a year as a member, I have been lucky to see the union host speakers including Billie Jean King, Malala, and John Major. All of these speakers I feel I learned something from. What is there to learn from someone like Kathleen Stock? Do I really want to know what ‘one piece of advice’ she would give someone in my position? Not particularly. Do I think anything will be gained from a so-called ‘debate’ with her? No. 

So, what should we see from the Union? I don’t expect a lack of controversy; there are important issues in our time that are likely to spark heated debate. But it doesn’t have to be a case where we invite people who question the rights of our peers to be themselves and express who they are. The union should be a place of inspiration. A place where we find like-minded people. A place where, yes, those who oppose us can challenge us. But we shouldn’t accept that guests are going to challenge who our peers are as people. That crosses a line. 

Image Credit: Padraic//CC BY-SA 2.0 via Flickr