Sunday 3rd August 2025
Blog Page 1939

Wanted: Brasenose JCR Committee

0

Brasenose college JCR received no nominations for Executive positions in the run up to its annual elections.

There were no applicants for the positions of JCR President, Vice President and Treasurer for 2011 by the deadline at midnight this Monday.

Returning Officer Rebecca Hill, who is organising this year’s JCR elections, said that she had been “surprised by the lack of enthusiasm” and that it was “unusual”.

JCR President Paul Gladwell agreed, “Having no nominations was disappointing, but I think it reflects that people are apprehensive about taking on such a time commitment. Also, people often just don’t want to run and lose.”

The news has caused concerns about the fate of the JCR among some Brasenose students, and one second year student suggested the lack of applicants was the result of negative student opinion about the JCR.
He said, “As the Cashmore affair proved, the JCR is toothless and that maybe a reason why people are not running.

“It’s a shame that no one put themselves forward originally and any one that does the job probably does not want to do it out of conviction. This is not what we want from our JCR.”

However, Gladwell dismissed the comments, saying that this is “a ridiculous idea that devalues both the good relations between the JCR and the SCR and college staff and the respectful and casual student atmosphere at Brasenose.”

The application deadline was extended to Wednesday night and Gladwell confirmed that there have now been multiple applicants for each position.

He said, “What is good is that we now have some solid candidates who are keen to build on what the JCR has already achieved.”

Protesters force Vodafone to close

0

Thirty people forced the Vodafone shop on Cornmarket to temporarily close on Saturday, in a protest against corporate tax evasion.
The protest came after Private Eye magazine revealed that Vodafone negotiated a deal with Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, agreeing to let the company off a large amount of tax.

The actual figures are unknown, although Vodafone have denied a reported figure of £6 billion.

Protesters sat inside the shop from 2pm for two hours, while others held banners reading, “Vodafone’s Tax Dodge: £6bn; Welfare Cuts: £7bn.”
The protesters were eventually removed by police, and one Oxford Brookes student was arrested after refusing to leave.

The protest formed part of a national day of action against Vodafone’s tax evasion, with sit-ins happening in stores in eight cities across the UK.

Donations hit £1 billion mark

0

Oxford’s Vice-Chancellor announced last week that the University’s international fundraising campaign has collected over £1bn. The money will go to fund undergraduate teaching, new buildings and student scholarships.

Professor Hamilton described the generosity of philanthropic donors as “fundamental to Oxford’s future” and thanked them for continuing to give despite the economic downturn.

He also highlighted the long term need to make the tutorial system more ‘financially sustainable’ in the face of a permanent decrease in government funding.

The Campaign for the University of Oxford is set to continue until it reaches its final target of £1.25 billion.

Central to the fundraising has been Dame Vivian Duffield, chairman of the campaign since its official launch in 2008, who recently decided to step down. She is thought to have played a pivotal role in achieving this milestone.

£69.90 for an Oxford degree

0

A man selling fake qualifications, including masters degrees claiming to be from Oxford University, has been jailed for three years.
David Fox, 51, was found guilty of four counts of fraud and pleaded guilty to twelve counts under the Trademark Act and Copyright, Designs and Patents Act.

Mr Fox sold novelty diplomas and certificates through his website www.businessdigest.co.uk, which he claimed were “Better than the real thing and with much better grades!!”

Certificates for an Oxford master’s degree were available for £69.90.The website cautioned that its diplomas were “intended for novelty use only” and that businessdigest.co.uk “took no responsibility for their use in any matters perpetrating to unlawful behaviour.”

However, the website still boasted that “Our replicas are so good that they are often used as a replacement for an existing document” and that “our products have been subjected to the highest level of scrutiny and proven their value time and time again.”

A prosecutor said that Fox indicated that he knew what his degrees were being used for, because he frequently followed disclaimers with a “;)”.

Prosecutor Mark Jackson asked Mr Fox in court, “How funny would it be to prank your friends on the basis that you had got a BTEC higher national certificate in electrical engineering, do you wonder?”

Mr Fox was caught after Birmingham’s trading standards agency began investigating his company after a certificate claiming to be from the National Examination Board in Occupational Safety and Health – a health and safety examining board – was redirected to them by the Post Office.

The trading standards agency investigated Mr Fox by having an officer from the department pretend to be a student named ‘Christina McCullogh’ and order a Grade A chemistry GCSE certificate, a 2:1 chemistry degree from the Open University and a masters degree in chemistry from Oxford.

Recorder Abigail Nixon, sentencing Mr Fox at Wolverhampton Crown Court, said, “The potential damage from your behaviour … is immense.” She added that his actions might have damaged “the fabric of society.”

News of the availability of fake degree certificates provoked a mixed reaction from students around Oxford.

One second year said, “It is immensely frustrating that someone could convince an employer that they had the same degree as me without putting in any of the work.”

Sammana Ladha, a first year student at Oriel College, said, “Its hard to believe that employers would mistake a dodgy certificate from an online business for a real degree.”

£10 million China Centre for St Hugh’s

0

A new centre dedicated to China Studies is to be built on St Hugh’s College grounds, thanks to a £10 million donation from Hong Kong based philanthropist Dickson Poon CBE.

Dickson Poon is the founder of one of Hong Kong’s largest and most profitable retailing enterprises and is the owner of the Harvey Nichols Group in the UK.

The benefactor has said that he hopes that through a “balanced and dispassionate” understanding of Chinese culture, the new centre “will generate practical innovations and strategies to enhance the growing relationships between China and the West.”

St Hugh’s Bursar, Mary Kerr, said that the 6,600 square metre building would also serve to provide more accommodation for students.
Kerr said that the college had been planning to increase facilities, but that “it is extremely difficult to interest donors in such projects.
“Whilst discussing our plans with potential Hong Kong and Chinese donors, the Principal realised that planning a building that could also house China Studies would be a more attractive proposition.

“He was absolutely right and so far we have received donations and pledges of £13 million, but we need another £7 million.

“This is very exciting for St Hugh’s in terms of both increased facilities and prestige.”

The building is expected to house 70 ensuite rooms, a lecture space, study areas and kitchen and dining facilities.

Andrew Dilnot, the Principal of St Hugh’s, has said the he hopes that the Centre will enhance the College’s international credentials, and said he is anticipating scholarships for “outstanding students who want to study this fascinating and increasingly important part of the world.”

The China Centre will build on a 400-year relationship between Oxford University and China. The Bodleian Library acquired its first Chinese book in 1604, and there are now more than 40 academics involved in China-related study.

Construction on the China Centre will begin in 2012. In recognition of China’s increasing economic, political and cultural influence, the Centre will encourage collaboration between academics in Oxford and the East.

“Oxford already has more academics who work on China than any other European university and over a wider range of subjects,” Dr Rana Mitter, Acting Director of the China Centre, told Cherwell.
“Now the Centre will help us use that expertise to build further bridges to China’s major institutions through conferences, exchanges and new projects.”

“What happens in China will help to shape the century to come,” said Lord Patten, Chancellor of Oxford University and the last UK governor of Hong Kong.

“In Oxford we wish to be ever more involved in studying that exciting process.”

The country’s prominence is also reflected in the university’s large Chinese contingent. There are currently 750 Chinese students in Oxford.

“It is considered fashionable to study abroad. Eleven students from my local school alone received Oxbridge places this year” said first year student Kate Zhu.

The Centre will bring together academics from across the university’s currently fragmented China Studies department. The venture is directly supported by both the Humanities and Social Sciences Divisions.

Fun has been resurrected, says Jesus

0

Jesus college JCR committee members have been fighting back this week against the college’s new reputation for lacking fun.
This follows a protest staged last month by Jesus students against stringent new academic policies imposed by college authorities.
Jesus’ “climate of fear” has been determinedly challenged, with members of the JCR committee leading the way.

Welfare representative Jocelyn Knight revealed to Cherwell that he had spent his Wednesday evening “in the college bar, before going on to throw all manner of shapes on the R’n’B floor at Park End.”
A motion passed during a JCR meeting at the start of term claimed that Dr Alexandra Lumbers, Jesus’ Senior Tutor, was using “scare tactics” to raise academic standards.

The motion suggested “that all members wear black armbands” in remembrance of fun, and was passed with one abstention and no votes against it.

However, another committee member, Jesus JCR’s Access representative Michael Lisanti, was keen to assure Cherwell that he is resisting the much feared “death of fun”. Lisanti went as far as to claim admittance to John Radcliffe hospital for “exhibiting dangerous levels of fun”.

The Access rep said that he had been treated for “defunning”.
He described the process as “difficult and complex” and continued that it was “not dissimilar from that which is utilised following an overdose of methylated spirits, in which victims are weaned off slowly in order to minimise shock to the system.”

JCR President Alex Mohan, previously explained the successful motion in an email to students, saying that while the students’ actions were a “light hearted and tongue-in-cheek mourning of fun,” it marked a “protest against the changing attitude of the senior members of staff in the College towards what is expected of students.”

He said, “The tone of this year’s freshers’ week and the increased use of special and penal collections over the past year are detrimental to this healthy balance, pushing the emphasis too far towards work at the expense of welfare and enjoyment of the university experience.”
However, Knight told Cherwell that he rejected the claims made in the otherwise uncontested JCR motion and defended the social scene at Jesus.

“I am having a lovely time. Perhaps you need to examine just how much fun you’re having in your life.”

Lisanti also argued that a night in Park End nightclub was still “the archetypal central case of undergraduate living at Jesus College.
“For the true Jesus experience, one simply cannot beat flailing one’s sweaty, naked torso about the Cheese room whilst belting out “Living on a Prayer” or some other suitably inspiring and stirring morsel of popular music.”

Welfare rep at St. Anne’s college Saras Mane warned against the dangers of excessive drinking.

He said, “Binge drinking and late nights certainly have their toll on one’s general well-being, as well as academic performance, and the maintenance of a healthy work-life balance is a vital part of student welfare.”

However, Knight assured Cherwell that there was no cause for concern.

He said, “Thank you so much for showing so much consideration into the welfare and wellbeing of the members of Jesus College, I am genuinely touched at the heartfelt emotion being expressed by yourself and your contemporaries at The Oxford Student. However I can assure you that your worries are misplaced.”

The Senior Tutor at Jesus was unavailable for comment on whether the perceived academic push has encouraged the behaviour of the JCR committee members.

Masked protesters at Careers Fair

0

The university’s annual Science and Engineering Fair was disrupted by students protesting against BAE Systems this Wednesday.
BAE Systems, who had a stall at the fair, is the second largest global defence company.

The protest was organised by the Oxford Anti-War Action.
At around 6 pm five students entered the Town Hall, where the fair was taking place. Once inside, they put on “death masks” and held a large sign that read “BAE sells Israel kills.”
One of the protesters stuck a red tear drop indicating a number of Gaza victims on a BAE Systems representative.
The representative then grabbed him by his shirt and is alleged to have said, “If you don’t get out now I’m going to thump you.”
The BAE employee, who refused to give his name, later explained to that “these are private premises, people have paid to be here.”
He later told Cherwell “if they are trespassing then they are here for unlawful purposes.”

One of the protesters was thrown out by a security guard but later managed to get successfully back into the fair.
Police arrived at the scene and told the protesters that they would be liable for arrest if they did not leave the fair.

A police officer stated there was a need “to balance their right to protest with those of a lawful company”.

The reaction sparked criticism from students at the fair. One postgraduate Chemistry student, Liz Raiment, who attended the fair, commented that the reaction to the protesters was “not fair on students.”

However, the police representative rejected the comments, saying, “If you’ve got a problem with that, speak to Prime Minister David Cameron.”

The security guard who threw out one of the protesters told Cherwell that he was “‘just doing [his] job” and had “no opinion on the politics.”
One of the protesters, Ben Hudson, a first year student at Regent’s Park, felt that “not only is BAE Systems’ business immoral and unacceptable, but it is also incompatible with the beliefs of the student body to have them advertise at careers fairs.

“Their arms are not licensed for exports and they sell to countries like Israel, condemned by the UN for human rights violations.”
Kate Halls, another protester, told Cherwell “they said we are obstructing a lawful business but unfortunately it is an unlawful business.

“The university is not only willing us to do business with them but our fees are feeding directly to deaths of Palestinian children.”
Oxford Anti- War Action describe themselves as a group of student activists who are “outraged by the wars being fought by the UK and its allies”.

Women still the second sex

0

The composition of the Lib Dem – Conservative coalition begs a clear question: where are the women? There were more Etonians than women on David Cameron’s shadow front-bench, the most active woman during the election was Sam Cam and now the Minister for Women is also the Home Secretary. Theresa May’s appointment implies that the needs of 50% of the population are a part-time job.
The coalition’s policy is just as dismissive. Of the £8bn of cuts announced in the emergency budget, £5.75bn affected women and the CSR is worse: of 500,000 public-sector job cuts 65-80 per cent are likely to be women and housing cuts will hit a million more women than men. The Fawcett Society is campaigning to have the emergency budget declared invalid because no gender audit was done before its announcement. It’s an unpleasant truth that cuts will always affect low-earners more because welfare is targeted at them, but why are so many women in low-paid jobs in the first place?

In education, the girls beat the boys hands down. If you count the number of Firsts and 2:1s together, we are still ahead at university, even here at Oxford. But after that, women lose out so much that there is a pay gap of 16.4 per cent and a pension gap of 40 per cent. Why? I blame the children – and ‘women’s work’.

Women dominate careers with a high social value but low financial rewards. Cameron’s Big Society is set to shift many of these professions from the public sector into the voluntary sector, and this is not necessarily bad if it means services are cheaper for users. But the plans contain nothing to increase womens’ employability elsewhere and nothing to encourage more men to get involved, which will be essential to break the existing link between gender and social responsibilities. The policy seems to say, “Keep doing what you do best, but don’t expect to be paid for it.” Mad Men eat your heart out.
Women are also more likely to leave work for significant periods to have children and, if they do come back, it’s often part-time. Large firms operate ‘up-or-out’ career ladders designed to put women off having children until their late thirties. It’s open discrimination that reflects the reality – men only get two weeks of paternity leave compared to up to 52 weeks for women, and they rarely take it. The coalition offers some hope here – when mandatory retirement is scrapped, with 50 year careers, and rising pension ages, taking 1, 2 or even 5 years off to have kids should be less of a blow but parental leave needs to reflect fathers’ responsibilities.

But Cameron should do something bigger to stop women leaving the workplace at all. In 1992, Sweden endured a credit crunch and, in response to government cuts, a coalition of female MPs campaigned to ensure pre-school childcare was available to everyone. It is now means-tested up to a cap of about £200 a month. In the UK, childcare costs an average of £250 a week. It’s unsurprising that 90% of Swedish mothers with children under five return to work, leaving their kids in kindie.

The results speak for themselves. Although educational attainment is only slightly higher than the UK, Sweden has one of the highest rates of intergenerational social mobility in the world, and the proportion of women who work full-time is higher among those with young kids than those without. Of course, some women prefer to stay at home even if they can afford childcare. In Denmark in the 1980s, before kindergartens were widespread, 43% of mothers worked part-time saying they wanted to stay at home with their children. In 2000, 83% worked full-time. In one generation, well-staffed high-quality childcare provided a way out of mother’s guilt and back into the workplace.
Cameron has an opportunity to change the future for generations of children, and millions of women. So far the coalition has only shown women their limits; now, it is time to push them.

Tom Bradby: the next Nick Robinson

0

I met with Tom Bradby the day before Osborne’s axe was set to fall. A stressful time for any political pundit, let alone ITV News’ top man in Westminster. Bradby, though, is remarkably laid back. The former student actor has a reputation as a bit of a smooth operator. No doubt this has something to do with his looks, which seem more Hollywood than Holyrood. Indeed, as I found out, he was (partly) inspired to go into journalism by Mel Gibson.

His primary motivation, however, is a desire to be present at era-defining events: “I love history, and my driving force is that every time I studied any period of history, I found myself thinking, god I wish I’d been there. Take the Russian revolution. How amazing would it have been to be in Peterograd when that broke out? Why wouldn’t you want to be there for the great events in your own lifetime? [Journalism] is a great life, and I’ve seen many extraordinary things – not always nice things, but extraordinary.”

As a younger man (Bradby is now 43), he says that he was attracted into foreign affairs by the film The Year of Living Dangerously, in which Mel Gibson plays a foreign correspondent who becomes embroiled in a Communist coup in Jakarta. “Being a foreign correspondent is inherently more glamorous. Ninety-five percent of the time you would not believe how anyone could possibly be paying you to do this – staying in fancy hotels, hanging out under palm trees, riding in helicopters, seeing incredible things. Unfortunately, the five percent that’s really horrible is really, seriously horrible.”

I wonder if the danger is simply too great. “If you get to the stage where I was, by the time I was a fully-fledged correspondent I had three young children. I just found myself thinking, on numerous occasions, I don’t particularly want to die here. You think of your kids who hardly know you, and your wife, and imagine someone asking ‘who was your dad?’. I found that quite difficult to deal with. And then I got shot. In a way, it made it easier, because you always dread something like that happening, and if it does happen, you think: I’ve survived, therefore I must be invincible.”

Bradby was shot in the leg with a flare gun while covering riots in Jakarta. I ask him whether this experience has given him a sense of perspective in his political journalism. “It’s definitely more frightening than interviewing Gordon Brown. I don’t get scared by politicians. I think if you did this job and you allowed yourself to be intimidated, you wouldn’t get very far very fast. Sometimes interviewees get ugly though. Politicians tend to get annoyed if you keep asking the same question.”

Bradby denies that it’s his job to rile politicians up, saying that he doesn’t “go out of his way to create conflict”. So why does it look that way? “If I ask a straight question, it’s very important to get a straight answer. The other day, I asked David Cameron if it was fair that somebody earning £46,000 was losing their child benefit whereas a couple living next door earning £83,000 combined were keeping it. He kept on answering a different question, so I kept repeating the original question. They don’t like that.”

When not subjecting politicians to interrogation, Bradby spends his time writing historical thrillers. He is currently working on his seventh (in eleven years), and claims to rewrite his books eighteen to twenty times each. “I think the main thing about writing is you have to get on and do it. You’ve just got to say ‘I’m going to write between 9 and 12’ and get on with it. I mean, obviously if it’s not there in your head you can’t do it, but the answer is to sit down and start trying to write something. Filling the blank page is always the hardest thing.

Rewriting something is always much easier than writing it down.”
Bradby believes quite strongly that there is no set formula for writing a blockbuster thriller. “I have a personal theory, which is that all great thrillers are kind of flukes. If you look at it, not many people have written more than one or at most two brilliant ones. Thomas Harris wrote Silence of the Lambs, which is a brilliant thriller, but the next book he wrote [Hannibal] was absolute drivel, I mean terrible, awful. It didn’t work at all.”

Tom Bradby’s predecessor at ITN was Nick Robinson – notoriously the president of OUCA while at University College. I ask Bradby whether he has any similar skeletons in the closet. “No definitely not! I’ve never done anything that is overtly political in any way, shape or form. I’m sort of the anti-activist. Every single time I go to every party conference, every year, there’s a moment when I watch people queueing up, and I think – what are these people doing? I mean, obviously I understand that we need politicians, and we need political activists, I just don’t have a set of views that is coherent from one hour to the next. That’s not to say I don’t have strong opinions on things; I probably think quite to the left on some things, and quite to the right on others. I just don’t really view myself as anything.”

I am curious to know how Bradby’s peers at Edinburgh University would have reacted to the Browne review. “Oh incredibly badly. The Scots would have been manning the barricades.” Bradby, who had covered the Poll Tax riots as editor of his student paper, went on to mourn what he sees as the effective dying-out of student militancy: youthful idealism has, to some extent, migrated from the streets to the Facebook group. This prompted Bradby to express regret for our generation: “University used to be much less a sort of jobs factory, and much more of a place to find yourself. There was less pressure on it. It was a time to kick back, be yourself, and enjoy life. With debt hanging over you it loses that sense of carelessness. It’s less attractive now.

There’s a horrible sense that some of us have in some way let down your generation. I do feel that. We had it pretty good, we had more or less free university, we had good jobs when we left, some of us got into final salary pension schemes for a while. You or the next generation of students are all going to leave university with massive debt, you’re never going to be able to afford to buy a house, because they’re hideously expensive, you’re never going to have a decent pension and you’ll have to work till you’re about 80. There’s not a lot to be joyous about, is there? Unless you go into investment banking, you’re just going to struggle on through life. I don’t know anyone of my age group of any political persuasion who thinks that’s anything other than bloody unfortunate, really.”

Debt and struggle make for a grim forecast. Looking for something positive to say about being a student, I ask Bradby whether he remembers his freshers’ week. “God, I do! I remember- I tell you, I’m a reasonably gregarious person, but freshers’ week is the only time in my life when I’ve literally gone up and said hello to people I like the look of – I don’t mean girls I like the look of per se – just people who look like they’d be good fun. I’ve never done that before and I’ve never done it since. It’s quite liberating, in a way, to walk up to anyone and say ‘Hi, I’m Tom, how are you?’. From doing that, I’ve ended up with some really good friends, who are still really good friends now.” We both decided that, at the very least, this had to be reason enough to go to University. Stuff the debt.

The week that was: Anti-Browne Protests

0

What happened?

Thursday. The High Street. Quietly bustling with tourists. Brasenose and Univites work solidly beneath the towering spires of All Soul’s. Suddenly (it was remarkably sudden) a great horde of a couple of hundred students, staff and random anarchists comes streaming down the street. They’re waving placards and making lots of shouty sounds. ‘Vince Cable shame on you, shame on you for turning blue’ was one. Alighting next to the Schools, the mobocrats mill around for about ten minutes. Some people were protesting against the Browne review which, as you surely know by now, proposes huge increases in tuition fees and cuts in university funding. Vince Cable, the Business Secretary, cancelled his talk in the Schools at the last minute. The protest was designed to coincide with this visit. The organisers decided to go ahead with it anyway.

What the papers say

It got on the BBC news. ‘Cable cancels Oxford visit’ drooled the press. Yet again, the Oxford angle is what makes the story.
What the dear old Cherwell had to say was more focussed on the protests themselves, or rather the reaction to them. Police were allegedly heavy-handed, perhaps excessively so. One St Hildan remarked, ‘I saw two cops trying to beat up a guy, I asked them to stop and a policeman grabbed me by the neck and threw me to the floor’. Sizzling stuff, especially when there were originally no scheduled plans for protests.

What now?

Unless Cable had actually been bludgeoned to death on arrival – not completely inconceivable given the violent SWP-themed protestors – it is hard to see what difference this will make to government policy. The sad thing is that if the protests hadn’t happened and Vince hadn’t cancelled, he would have been able to answer questions from an all-welcome student audience. This might have given him a better idea of what their views are. Instead he just sits in an office being told what the civil service wants him to be told. It’s a sad day for democracy: voices aren’t heard and there’s bugger all change. It was, however, a grand day out, and what’s also brilliant is that politicians were clearly too terrified to face the very people who use the services they want to cut. But by all accounts the a watered-down Browne review will pass the House of Commons and give future students an awful lot of debt. So for all the waving and shouting and being thrown to the floor, nothing will change.