Oxford's oldest student newspaper

Independent since 1920

Blog Page 2127

Restaurant Review: Oxford Organic Burger Company

The burger revolution is upon us. The old favourite has been reincarnated with trendy buzzwords such as ‘free range’ and ‘locally reared’, and a price tag to match. Jumping whole-heartedly onto the sesame-topped bandwagon is The Oxford Organic Burger Company Ltd (and you know they mean business by the capital letter of the definite article).

Now, I feel obliged to declare that my own relationship with the burger has a shady past. When I was too young to know better, (though old enough to look upon the meagre Happy Meal with distain), I regarded a termly pilgrimage to the golden arches as gastronomic bliss. The retina-bruising strip lights and sticky plastic benches scarred with pre-ban fag burns just seemed a part of the experience. As you can see, the revolution is long overdue.

Step inside the Cowley restaurant and the operative word ‘organic’ is neatly extended to the well thought out décor; with acres of slate, exposed brick, and log stools which lend a Faraway Tree feel to the bar. When the food appears on thick wooden slabs crudely hacked into plate-like form, one can almost imagine this as dinner at the Shire opposite Frodo Baggins. Until the organic Heinz tomato ketchup makes its entrance, that is.

A good burger with chips is a beautiful thing. It is an emblem of simple pleasure in a world filled with exams, job applications, student loans, and decisions about which pub to frequent. Its reassuring consistency is something to find solace in when feeling fragile. You know there will be meat. There will be bread. There will be deep-fried potato.

If you feel able to cope with an additional ingredient the Oxford Blue burger (£8 inc. chips) comes highly recommended, providing you can forget its painfully punned title. The lump of meat comes adorned with oozing stilton which seems inexplicably attracted to chins and white t-shirts.

I must add that the chips here are exceptional; the perfect size with a skins-on earthiness; and on my numerous visits, never have I been subjected to the frequent, heart-sinking disappointment that is The Underdone Chip.

It pains me to say that the milkshake sampled was, quite frankly, a letdown. Admittedly my childish nostalgic glee had driven my levels of expectation into orbit (as did the astronomical £4 price tag), but the grainy, icy, tasteless cream was a poor effort.

It seems they have mastered the art of grilled and fried produce, but not yet frozen, for my iced yoghurt dessert (£3.50) was a similar disappointment. Though it proclaimed to be passionfruit, I had trouble discerning any flavour other than that sickly synthetic taste which is now validated under the ambiguous umbrella term ‘tropical’.

The Oxford Organic Burger Company also do breakfast (10am till midday), cocktails, and a stonking weekday lunch offer where £6 will bag you burger, chips and beer; and who doesn’t love a lunchtime drink? If this doesn’t tempt you to join the revolution, nothing will.

 

Interview: Quentin Blake

Walking into the Oxford Union, the first thing we noticed about Quentin Blake was the little white plimsolls poking from underneath the table. Slightly unconventional considering he was wearing a suit and it was snowing outside.

Delightful though it was to see the curious choice of footwear, it was not entirely unsurprising, as children’s writer Roald Dahl used to note this feature of his wardrobe: “here’s old Quent, he’s going out for dinner in his plimsolls!'” When speaking to Blake, it’s hard to keep eye contact, as his hands seem to constantly sketch out his thoughts. His hands are just as expressive as his words. That, perhaps, is the secret to his success as a popular illustrator for almost half a century.

Most renowned for his collaboration with Dahl, Blake illustrated more than twenty of his books. Collaboration is, indeed, the right word for their working relationship, as his drawings have become synonymous with Dahl’s work. In fact, editions illustrated by other artists have been greeted with disdain, while the characters in film adaptations of the books stray from Blake’s depictions at their peril.

Having been put together by their shared publisher, what started as a working relationship eventually developed into a close friendship held together by their shared vision of the finished product; “with the Dahl books I would take them down and see what he thought of them. He mostly said ‘Quent always gets it right’. I didn’t quite always get it right” Blake says, in a typically modest fashion.

Blake’s persistence in doing his character’s justice is what makes his and Dahl’s style unique. By the end of the book, the combination of story and drawings means that you are fully acquainted with all aspects of the character, something which Blake himself discovered.

“By the time you’re doing the final illustrations of the book you feel you know what that person looks like” he says. “If you look at the rough drawings you’ve started off with, you realise they weren’t quite like that; it’s as if you’ve got to know the characters by drawing them”.

Blake’s drawings are notorious for their scribbled nature. “I think I came to it almost by accident really, by doing rough drawings and finding they were better than the finished drawings,” Blake says, noting how the spontaneous quality of his work is its strength. He describes the process involved in his drawings, where he begins with an initial sketch, which evolves into the finished piece- complete yet nevertheless maintaining the endearing appeal of his images.

Quentin Blake is always drawing, the sketchy nature of his work ideal for constantly scribbling down new creations. In fact, The Life of Birds, one of his favourite books, was created from a sequence of random drawings: “and then I thought ‘perhaps I’ll just make a book out of it'” he muses.

As we speak to him, we can understand that his restless hands are permanently at work at what he repeatedly refers to as ‘the cooking process’, and it is for this reason that we can believe the image of his jotting pad beside his phone that he describes. “I’ve got a whole collection of stuff,” he says, “I don’t know if they’ll ever get published, called Telephone drawings”.

Blake, however, is never out of work, having written many of his own books, and recently illustrated David Walliams’ new book, The Boy in the Dress. When we bring it up, he smiles wryly, saying “it’s nice to be able to illustrate for somebody who’s half your age!”

On mentioning the controversy surrounding the children’s book, which seems to imply a level of autobiography, thus suggesting that Walliams himself, a proclaimed lothario, was himself struggling with his sexuality. Blake smiles: “I didn’t know there was any”. We leave it at that, not wanting to embark upon a transvestite-based conversation with this sweet plimsoll clad man.

Unlike other artists who try and justify their skill through treating their work as culturally significant, Blake is keen to deny any great talent on his part; “You can’t think about it, you just have to start drawing and seeing what you discover.” His keenness to bring art to the masses has led to his participation in the annual Big Draw, and his close association with a new museum of illustrations based in Dulwich.

We ask Blake what else he has lined up for the future. With Dahl’s granddaughter, Sophie’s new writing career, we suggest that he might be tempted to continue the Dahl-Blake tradition with the inspiration of the BFG. “Well I’d certainly consider it! I think she’s making out alright with the illustrator she’s got actually!”

He is, however, eager to continue his work on literary classics. Having enjoyed great success with Quentin Blake’s Christmas Carol, (“that title was not my idea!” he is quick to establish), he would be keen to try some more Dickens (“I’m a great admirer”, he says).

After that, who knows what to expect from a man with a distinctive drawing style and a catalogue of much-loved books which are a permanent feature of most people’s shelves. Quentin Blake has been a part of the lives of millions of people, and he has no intention of stopping at the grand age of seventy six.

 

If these walls could talk

Oh, Oxford! Oh, beating heart of knowledge! Oh, trembling epicentre of debate! Your archaic colleges, witnesses to so many years of intellectual conquests; your libraries, famed for their extraordinary collections; your English Faculty on St Cross road, and the handwriting on the walls of the female toilet cubicles!

Who would have thought that so much could be learnt outside of the lecture theatres, the reading lists and the tutorials? That these stirrings of the truths of life are forevermore embedded into the university’s sanitary facilities?

This is not criminal graffiti. Oh no. This is the detailed etchings of students who are feverish to liberate their wisdom from the captivity of their minds, to impart it to other seekers of knowledge. These noble writers and their fair readers share the need for discussion, new concepts, confrontations, and the toilet.

What joy can be found in time-constrained wisdom, with its potential forced out in the time it takes to ‘do one’s business’. Strange looks from those waiting outside may occur when caught emerging from a cubicle either chuckling, contemplating, or after having spent an unexpectedly long time inside.

Yet these stares do nothing to deter the Truth-Seeker from dwelling between those white walls so as to revel in their quotes, comments and fantastic pretentiousness. And The World agrees: this year American author Doug Rice published From the Stall, a chronicle of some of the most insightful pieces of writing on the walls of the bathrooms in some of Michegan’s universities. Also this year, an exhibition at New York’s Nicholas Robinson Gallery featured a painting of bathroom wall graffiti by Munich-based artist Florian Süssmayr.

Of course, neither example quite reaches the levels attained by the Oxford University English student. One artist in Cubicle III proclaims, in a rather virulent pink highlighter, her sense of exclusion and injustice in being ‘a lonely queer, who did not study Latin, went to a crap school and is a dwarf’.

Yet she is still in a place of which many others can only dream. The English Faculty toilets. There are around 600 female English students – a meagre five percent of the total undergraduate population. The walls can be hidden no longer. The time has now come to flick back their locks, embrace men and non-English students alike, and expose the wonders therein…

A journey through the cubicles begins with someone’s suitable introduction of ‘an Oxford University Bathroom Stall… witticisms, pop culture references, self portraits’, and a drawing of girl wearing a badge which reads ‘freedom for toilet wall ART’. The great detail and size suggests that this particular student was in the cubicle for rather a long time, even by English Student Standards, but she puts the point across well.

Literary quotes abound, of course, with Cubicle II providing the perfect space for boasting about one’s capacity to memorise and recite. A quote from King Solomon’s Mines, a favourite among first-years, is used by a recluse to assert ‘I’m still alive, I’m still alive’, and an elegant hand has written ‘She seemed at once the penance lady elf, the demon’s mistress, or the demon’s self’. Any guesses as to the poet? (Answer: Keats).

The same cubicle also showcases everyone’s favourite: Jane Eyre. The famous line of ‘Reader I married him’ receives the response that, unfortunately, ‘He ruined me’ and the comment ‘well, that’s what you get for saying ‘yes, sir’ when he asked. Look it up’. Ah, Jane Eyre banter. It’s underrated.

As well as knowledge of literature, some students also go out of their way to demonstrate the key work skills that are also needed to be a Good English Student and write a first-class essay. A cheeky girl altered Dryden’s ‘A milk white hind, immortal and unchang’d’ by adding a ‘be’ prefix to the ‘hind’ (get it, get it?), and the eloquent conclusion of ‘doth grace this plastic seat of porcelain curved’. What a clear and practical demonstration of the usefulness in adapting every quote to the purpose intended, toilet humour included.

Literary devices, also, are advertised – most enthusiastically in the declaration by one student that ‘ALLITERATION IS BETTER THAN SEX! It’s perhaps not a unanimous decision, but it is a touching portrayal of enthusiasm for one’s subject. Another work skill, referencing, was instilled by one student who drew an arrow to a quote of poetry to label it as an extract from Wordsworth’s The Prelude. ‘Acknowledge your quotes, woman’, she demands. Indeed.

Cubicle IV will teach you a brief definition of ‘Tragedy’ and remind you of the importance of rigorous grammar, spelling and punctuation checks. ‘If you’ve got a full-stop, you need a verb’ a student advises. One poor victim made the mistake of making a mistake on the sacred wall. Sin of sins, she failed to recognise a pun. ‘Must be a first-year’, a more erudite superior writes, as everyone else nods in condoling agreement.

Is this nitpicking, as an angry red marker-pen accuses in fierce capitals? No no, it is necessary instruction, after all – everyone’s a winner in the spell-check game. What would Milton say? Will lectures ever stop being terrifying? What is your favourite novel? Cubicle III will ask these of you, and invite you to consider seriously your answers. ‘Milton, Shelley and Blake shall smash the bourgeois state!’ is another prominent comment, particularly with the response underneath it from another writer that ‘you ARE the bourgeois state!’

These questions, these invitations to Thought, these constructive criticisms. Fortunately, those in charge of the English Faculty’s amnesties have recognised the need to preserve these wall etchings, obviously understanding their importance in the reputation of ‘English at Oxford’.

One student questioned whether ‘this will still be here when I come back’, and although it did indeed avoid any caretaker’s assault, it was promptly scribbled out by blue biro for being ‘pointless’. Such empty words should not occupy such precious space.

The writing on the wall has come a long way since its first invention in Ancient Rome. The first examples of ‘graffiti’ survive on the walls of Pompeii, preserved for two-thousand years under volcanic ash; messages such as ‘burglar, watch out!’ and ‘I don’t want to sell my husband’ would perhaps not be appropriate nowadays.

All that time ago, one Roman wrote ‘I am amazed, O wall, that you have not collapsed and fallen, since you must bear the tedious stupidities of so many scrawlers’. Tedious stupidities! What an accusation! Did he not realise the profundity, the wisdom, the intellectual feats obtained by his fellow men? Perhaps the wall art of Pompeii was not quite of the standard of that of the English Faculty.

A reasoned assessment, naturally, yet still amongst our own contemporaries there are echoes of this Roman writer’s fury. ‘YOU ARE ALL FRAUDS!’ is screamed in multi-coloured bubble letters across the length of Cubicle II. ‘This is THE MOST pretentious graffiti I’ve ever read’, cries out a red-felt tip.

Well, of course! These walls do nothing to hide their self-importance – they embrace it, scribble it around the loo-roll holder, on the doors, high up above the level of seated eyesight. And therein lies the Ecstasy! This is their Thrill Factor, this is their privilege to uphold the OOSS (Ostentatious Oxford Student Stereotype)! Whether you relish the poetical quotes, the grammatical instructions or learn that Lemon Drizzle cake is ‘the most important, profound, meaningful discovery made at Oxford University… ever’, these walls will encourage self-induced self-importance and intentional incontinence.

Oh anonymous authors, where are you? Your bravery to sharpen your pencil and scribble for the sake of your University and your Subject is unrivalled. Show yourself, acknowledge your wittiness, your wisdom and your wiles as well as you reference your essays.

Your genius is at work whilst that of your revered authors sits on the pages upstairs and that of your lecturers in the next door rooms passes over the heads of many. Take longer in the bathroom and incorporate Cubicle Time into your lecture schedule (the second one down needs particular work). You are the Read. You are the Wisdom. Listen to Cubicle III – ‘TAKE BACK THE BLANK’.

 

University to investigate uni rugby ‘Jew party’

A “bring a fit Jew” party organised by the Under 21’s squad of the Oxford University Rugby Club has sparked an investigation by the University.

Guests were told to bring a ‘fit’ Jewish girl to the event which was due to be held on Wednesday night.

Officials from the Oxford University Students’ Union rushed to have the controversial theme changed at the last minute, with the rugby captain giving assurances that the theme had been altered to “bring a fit girl” instead.

Despite this a number of students have claimed a number of the players still attended the event fully dressed in stereotypical Jewish attire, although this has been denied by the captain of the squad.

“Unacceptable behaviour”

A spokesperson for Oxford University confirmed that an investigation had been launched into the incident.

“We are currently investigating a report about inappropriate and unacceptable behaviour by two or three students,” she said.

“We cannot comment directly on the case as we have yet to establish the facts. However, the University unreservedly condemns racial stereotyping.”

Meanwhile, the Oxford University Jewish Chaplain confirmed that he had received complaints from several appalled students the morning after the event at Jamal’s curryhouse in Jericho.

“It did go ahead as planned,” said Aaron Katchen.

“Four different students called me. Some saw people after they had left [the venue].”

He added that one complaint was sparked after a rugby player was heard bragging about the Jewish costume he had worn.

“If people and institutions of the University can find humour in portraying minorities in such a fashion then I am disappointed in students of this intellectual calibre.”

Regardless of whether of the rugby social was indeed eventually held under a ‘Jewish’ theme, organisations expressed outrage that the offensive theme had even been considered in the first place.

“We are appalled”

A spokesman for the Union of Jewish Students for the United Kingdom said,

“The actions of a few students have caused real offence.

“We are appalled that in 2008 old myths and anti-Semitic stereotypes are still appearing amongst supposedly educated students.”

A spokesman for CST (Community Security Trust), a national body responsible for providing training and advice for the protection of British Jews, said he could not believe what had been planned. “This event sounds at best extremely insensitive and stupid and at worst blatantly anti-Semitic and likely to cause feelings of vulnerability and isolation for Jewish students,” he said.

“It is very disturbing to see actions that years ago would have been resolutely condemned as racism now becoming acceptable at Oxford.”

The captain of the Under 21’s rugby squad admitted that a “bring a fit Jew’ party had been planned but denied that it had gone ahead.

“This is completely not true”

Asked to confirm whether the social did feature Jewish costumes, he insisted, “This is completely not true. There was no Jewish theme at all.”

He stressed that the original theme had never been meant to offend anyone. “I don’t see what the problem is,” he said.

“I can understand why it might have offended some people but it would have been an awesome social.

“All the Jewish girls who had been invited were really looking forward to it. They knew what the theme was and they are still going.”

Another member of the rugby squad, who wished to remain anonymous, said that he had initially thought the theme was “fairly good banter” but in retrospect had realised the incident was “not in touch with moral values of society.”

 

Have you witnessed racial stereotyping among students at Oxford? You can contact our news team using this address: [email protected]

Student’s ceiling collapses

A second-year Wadham student narrowly escaped being hurt after the ceiling over her bed suddenly caved in during the early hours of the morning.

Fortunately, Maleha Khan was working at her desk at the moment when the ceiling collapsed without warning.

The cave-in littered her pillow with rubble and large chunks of plaster.

Had she been in bed at the time, the Law student could have suffered severe facial injuries.

“I didn’t really know what to do,” she explained, “I was really shocked, and couldn’t sleep. I stayed up until the next morning.”

She rang the estate agents letting her the property in St Mary’s Road, Cowley the following morning, but the response she got was, “it’s an old property, what do you expect?”

The agents sent contractors to inspect the large hole in the ceiling that afternoon, but Khan said that they were insensitive and rude, and asked them to leave.

The workmen returned to finish the repairs the following day, only to leave Maleha’s room and possessions covered in dust and debris, forcing her to sleep elsewhere for several days.

“They were just really rude and unsympathetic to my situtation,” said Khan. “They just stood on my bed whilst they were trying to fix the roof and didn’t even bother to lay down any protective sheets.

“My clothes were just tossed into my cupboard and there was rubble everywhere, including on my printer, straighteners and handmade quilt.”

The student added that she had subsequently sent a letter to the estate agents demanding compensation for her cleaning expenses and an exemption from this month’s rent.

A spokesperson for the estate agents in question insisted that the company had “acted appropriately in a professional and timely manner” following the ceiling collapse on Thursday last week.

The UK-wide letting agency who own the house added that as far as they were concerned there was no question of negligence.

“The house was in perfectly reasonable condition for letting. No one has ever raised complaints before and it is inevitable to have cracks in old houses,” said a spokesperson.

“The room was vacuumed and wiped down after the workmen left the property.”

 

Arrested student receives £1,500 compensation

A student from St Anne’s has been awarded £1,500 following his “humiliating” arrest for throwing a bottle of water to a protester earlier this year.

The chief constable of Thames Valley Police apologised to the student this week for the “inconvenience” of the arrest, and offered compensation as an out of court settlement.

Jonathon Leighton, a second year, was arrested and handcuffed, and held in a police station for several hours, on the 13th January. He had his fingerprints, DNA and photographs taken, and was released the next day at 5.15am.

Leighton was arrested after he tried to throw a bottle of water to eco-protester Gabriel Chamberlain, who was protesting against the proposed development of Bonn Square.

Leighton has called his treatment “humiliating”.

He said, “the fact that I was handcuffed and held in a police cell is humiliating.

“I wouldn’t wish it to happen to anybody else, which is why I think it is crucial to explore legal avenues and hold the police accountable for their actions.

“I believe it was right to pursue the legal channel and tackle these injustices when they arise, or they will happen more often.”

Leighton stated that he would be donating the money to “Thames Valley Climate Action”, an environmental action group which he was a part of, and that the payout would be used in future campaigns.

Leighton stated that this should provide adequate justification to the taxpayer for the money he received from his payout.

Local campaigner Sarah Horne was also involved in the Bonn Square protests and has spoken out in support of Leighton’s payout.

She said, “unfortunately many people experience unlawful arrests, violence, and other oppression when they take peaceful direct action on climate change and other environmental and social issues.

“Hopefully this result will remind the police that they are meant to be protecting the public, not harassing peaceful protesters.”

Leighton said, “I opposed the way that [Chamberlain] was dealt with by the council.

“I felt that it was very wrong they were stopping giving him food and water. I was more up in arms about that than the felling of trees.”

Leighton stated that he was “very pleased” with the result, but nevertheless stated that the financial payout had not been his main priority.

“It’s not so much about the money as about justice. What would have been justice for me would be if I hadn’t been arrested in the first place.

“I wish there was a way I could complain to the police and be sure that my complaint would be taken on board, and the appropriate disciplinary action followed. But I couldn’t be sure of this.”

After realising that he had grounds to make a legal complaint, Leighton’s solicitor wrote the Thames Valley Police to inform them of Leighton’sintension to make a claim through court.

Within three months, the police responded that they would be prepared to offer an out of court settlement.
At the time, Leighton stated that he police had “abused their powers” and has since insisted that his arrest was politically-motivated.

He said, “what I experienced was blatant political policing; my actions were not so much against the law as against the police.”

 

The World’s A Stage: Russia

It was my first Russian winter, and my first trip to the theatre. Glittering ballerinas twirled and pirouetted to the music of long-dead aristocrats, and outside the snow swirled, covering up giant potholes and dead tramps alike. The curtain fell. I began to clap merrily, but the faint pattering of my palms petered out into silence.

I looked around in sudden fear. Silence reigned. Then, I witnessed Russia’s own, semi-legendary approach to audience appreciation. As one Russian, the audience began to clap. Slowly, and in time. It was so quiet in between that you could hear the rustle of sleeves as the palms were brought together in a sinister, pulsing genuflection towards an empty stage.

Russia has given a lot to theatre. Chekhov’s depressing plays, for instance. Absurdity, courtesy of Gogol, though he didn’t have monopoly over the genre; during Stalin’s rule, absurdity mixed with blind fear if one ventured out to a play he’d enjoyed. Everyone was afraid to be the first to stop approving, a greater crime than what had already landed many in the gulag, so nobody stopped clapping before the Leader had left the room, which could take up to fifteen minutes. People’s hands swelled up. Old people collapsed from exhaustion in the aisles.

Nowadays, it’s a bit more fun. People wear their finest fur coats and old ladies dye their hair specially. However, the highlight is the interval, when everyone rushes to the buffet to eat red caviar and drink sweet champagne against the cold outside. Groups of friends sit around Formica tables from circa 1976, stiffly formal in their best suits and sequinned dresses.

As a nation, the Russians are ridiculously cultured. I once overheard a group of friends on a drunken night out in a provincial town stumble out into the street, fall over a set of tram tracks, but instead of shouting ‘It’s so fucking cold!’, one quoted a line from The Master and Margarita whilst lying prone in the path of an oncoming tram: ‘Alas, Berlioz, Anoushka has already spilled the oil!’.

Schoolchildren grow up reading the tales of Pushkin, hauntingly evocative of Russia, rather than infantile international mush about dogs called Spot. These ties to literature bring people back to plays as to old friends, having seen the world around them change as socialism died away and capitalism grew like a weed, while the works of their great playwrights remained familiar.

Going to the theatre is a way of connecting with their rich literary past, and perhaps, understanding the mysterious Russian Soul.

 

Brookes students in rugby rampage

Members of Oxford Brookes’ University Rugby Club paraded in hunting uniforms, wore sex toys and attacked a woman’s car while she was with her two-year old daughter in a social on Cowley Road.

When police arrived at the scene they were also found parts of an animal carcass. The incident left members of the public intimidated and was described as “inappropriate and offensive”.

Despite a formal apology from the club President, Ronnie Gunson, Brookes University’s Vice Chancellor, Professor Janet Beer, said the matter was being taken “extremely seriously”.

 

Review: The Academy

Of all the performing artists, actors often seem to suffer from the greatest kind of inferiority complex. Perpetually eager to show us that it’s some kind of highly specialised skill rather than just good looks, the compulsion has been lengthily mocked in modern pop culture. Think Team America (‘Act, Gary, damnit, act!’), and you’re almost there: it’s getting a hilarious new slashing in Oxford’s own Rhys Jones’ and Rob Hemmens’ musical The Academy.

We follow the story of Amy (Rebecca Tay), a starry-eyed innocent who joins the rigorous training regime at the austere Academy of the Science of Acting and Directing (ASAD). A promising student, she seems set for stardom, but soon discovers that the school’s scientific methods may not be as clandestine as they first seemed, with the Headmistress’ overseeing strange goings-on in the off-limits ‘graduate area.’ Apparently, ASAD really exists somewhere in London and the idea for the musical was born when Jones and Hemmens first came across the school’s ominously sounding name in some promotional material.

The drama and music continuously verge on the farcical: there’s an all-singing all-dancing lesson on dying a convincing stage death (which scientifically distinguishes between the dramatic, self-sacrificial, romantic and screamy death), and a cheesy romance between Amy and head boy Will (Robin Thompson). The deal is clinched (or perhaps killed?) by the ‘hey-hey-heying’ chorus and nonsensical romance lines of the ‘tell me a story and make it come true’ type.

But most of the humour draws on the antagonist, the quick-tempered ASAD Headmistress (the vocally capable Emma Lewis), whose increasingly oddball plan for world domination Amy has to stop. Her belting tango hymn to the virtues of the scientific approach to theatre (‘Guided by your heart you won’t get far / follow me and you will be a star’) is a great evil genius anthem. It will be interesting to see how her plan is carried out when the production is staged in 6th week.

At the time of writing, the production was in early rehearsal stages, and looked like it was still finding its rhythm. The acting needs some brushing up, but if The Academy comes off, it could do to drama schools what The Producers did to show business… so watch out for it.

Four stars

 

Ashmolean Museum to close till August

The Ashmolean Museum is due to close for a year while major redevelopment takes place.

The museum, founded in 1683, is the UK’s oldest public museum, and its collections range from Bronze Age tools to drawings by Michelangelo and Raphael.

Rick Mather, an award winning architect, has designed a new building that doubles the existing gallery space and features 39 new galleries, a new education centre, and Oxford’s first roof-top cafe.

The museum will reopen in Autumn 2009.