Friday 28th November 2025
Blog Page 2178

Race is a laughing matter – so why are we still constrained by colour?

0

Sophie Duker
French & English
Wadham College

What do you call a black man who flies a plane?
A pilot, you racist. So what do you call a black girl who goes to Oxford University? Statistically unlikely.
In 1969, Nina Simone sang Weldon Irvine’s immortal lyrics:
“In the whole world you know/There are a billion boys and girls/Who are young, gifted and black/And that’s a fact!”
These lines are inspiring. But they don’t change a fact I recently discovered; namely, that out of over 3,000 undergraduates admitted to Oxford in 2008, only I and 23 others identified as black African. Admittedly, there could be a few who chose not to identify themselves, but I doubt anyone bothered. You see, the thing about being black African, or Caribbean, for that matter, is that you’re fairly easy to identify, whether or not you ticked a box on your personal statement. You can’t hide your ethnicity by buying a polo shirt from ‘Fabulously British’ Jack Wills or by adopting the word ‘yah’ into your vocabulary-if you’re the only black girl in your lecture, you will stick out like a little cocoa-coloured anomaly. Interestingly, it seems to be a slightly different experience for black boys than for black girls. It’s largely due to The Obama Effect, mixed up with reminisces of Save the Last Dance. If you are a black boy who isn’t a rude-i.e. no ear piercings, good diction, good grades, a belt and no sharp pointy bits of metal about your person – you are automatically a young Barack. You are the future, you are breaking down barriers, you are setting an example. And everybody fancies you. None of this, by the way, is intended as a dig at either Iwu or Chigbo (current and elect presidents of Oxford & Cambridge student unions, respectively) who are both so accomplished and good-looking that comparisons to the American president are wholly unsurprising. One might think that at Oxford, an institution which prides itself on being a meritocracy, ethnic minority students would naturally not make their background an issue. Au contraire. As Yosola Olorunshola, a fresher studying French and History at Jesus College points out, “Quite a few of the other black students I’ve met from Oxbridge seem to embrace being ‘the only black in the village’-it’s a way of inverting your insecurity about it.” She continues, “If you’re going to stand out, it might as well be on your own terms.” Banter, which has alternately been translated to mean ‘ignorant bigotry’ and ‘witticisms between friends’, is a touchy subject, but something I believe it’s possible to defend. Just for clarification: a rugby team ‘blacking up’ is not banter. I doubt anyone would dare to do it in Acton-for fear of getting lynched-and it is definitely both alienating and offensive. Being able to have a conversation with someone who’s relaxed enough to joke around with you and isn’t afraid to be politically incorrect is liberating. What’s not is being around people made uncomfortable when you play the race card. Humour is one of the gentlest and nicest ways of educating people about their prejudices. It does much more to challenge people’s assumptions than just about anything else. Blending into the background, while obviously a literal impossibility, can be achieved to a certain extent though sheer bloody-mindedness-a refusal to acknowledge the colour of your skin, whether positively or negatively. But forsaking such a blatant part of your identity leads to identity crisis, whether or not you feel, or want to feel, a part of a greater black community. Some might think it’s unhealthy to fixate on difference. But it’s equally unhealthy to live in denial. Out of Simone’s ‘billion boys and girls’, only about 30 actually made it here, to one of the most respected academic institutions in the world. I see more black faces in one place behind the Sainsbury’s counter on the alcohol run than I ever have in my JCR. So, what can we do? (By ‘we’, I here mean everyone in the university, regardless of pigmentation.) Well, what anyone would hope we were going to do anyway. Laugh at each other, learn about each other, lovingly trade insults. Have a sense of humour without being insensitive. I don’t want to be constantly reminded about being black. But neither do I ever want to or will I ever be able to forget it. Africa bops are a great idea… but if someone can’t muster up enough imagination to come as something other than a blacked-up savage straight out of Heart of Darkness, it just shows they haven’t had enough exposure to the thirty or so black individuals who joined Oxford’s ranks of young and gifted last year.

Ravi Thambapillai
Founding President
International Relations Soc

You can have your British Prime Minister in any colour- as long as its not black. Or indeed any colour other than white. Yet, in America, that seems to no longer be the case. With the election of the first (half) black leader of the United States of America, the inevitable question has to be raised; why hasn’t it happened here?
Trevor Phillips has famously said that institutional racism in key governmental organisations, including, for example, the Labour Party, would prevent a young, intelligent but non-white candidate from rising to the top. Ironically, there are systemic constraints on ethnic minorities, but they are not institutional in the way that Trevor Phillips thinks. When we ask whether a black person could become Prime minister, we are really asking can an outsider become Prime Minister. Many educated people feel there is no important race relations question to be addressed here in Britain; saying its just a proxy for class. This is false and missing the point. Many affluent ethnic minorities put ethnic under-representation down to a question of class, that really the colour of your skin isn’t the main factor, but your socio-economic background. And it just so happens that, through no fault of the current British system or population, many more minority citizens hail from a lower socio economic background than their white counterparts. No doubt this plays a part, but it is not the only factor. In poorer regions, but particularly in the north in cities like Bradford, intra-class ethnic tension, segregation and conflict reaches levels that urbane Oxonian-Londoners could not begin to understand. However, even the wealthy southern institutions have worryingly white compositions.
Oxbridge is disappointingly un-colourful. There is a real problem regarding the ethnic composition of applications that come in the Oxbridge’s direction.
A discerning eye would see that the most likely explanation is that not enough ethnic students are applying. But while state school application ratios are now (at last) rising (too slowly), a recent Times article states applications from Indian and Chinese UK students are falling.
Yet the even more interesting issue is how insidious ‘tribalism’ is in our society. Even in the enlightened, educated land of Oxford, the Chinese students have a disproportionate number of Chinese friends, and the ‘brown’ students have a disproportionate number of brown friends. The ‘brown’ vote is even considered a demographic bloc in Union politicking. It shapes unconscious networks in Oxford, and outside in poorer regions it segregates people and breeds ignorance and contempt. It also shapes careers. Is it a total coincidence that the highest concentration of black faces in central Oxford are behind the counters on Cornmarket’s fast-food restaurants?
Even the hugely talented have race based influences on their careers. For integrated families, who have experienced success in a variety of different fields, medicine is one of the most respectable and impressive career choices. For many isolated Indian ones, it is the sole or preeminent pinnacle of achievement.
Reading Obama’s autobiography, ‘Dreams from my father’ provides an interesting contrast to UK ethnic minorities. The route that Obama finally takes to discover his Americanism is one that simply isn’t open to the British. Obama finds his patriotism and American identity by feeling the resonance of quintessentially American rhetoric about ‘the land of opportunity’ and ‘the audacity of hope’, looking in himself and finding his mindset to be, powerfully American.
No such mindset exists in the British people. There are few tangibly British qualities that ethnic groups can attach themselves to and really identify with. What does exist holds much less potency than its American version. Instead, if those who feel dislocated look inward in the search for their own national identity, they often find shared features with those of their skin colour, like the experience of battling a distinctly exotic cultural upbringing in the (generally unsuccessful) attempt to be part of the ‘cool group’ at school. These problems beset Obama as much as any UK Asian – but for him the solution was to be found in the distinct American identity. That solution simply does not exist on this side of the pond, leaving many British Asians to identify themselves, deep down, as Asian British.
It’s a popular opinion that racism in the UK is a thing of the past. It’s a popular opinion that is wrong. While overt and intentional discrimination is now fairly rare, a subtle insidious racism is an ever-present part of society. How many Asians have been pressured, albeit subtly, by members of their extended family, to prefer an Asian girlfriend or boyfriend? How many also, whilst dating white partners, have experienced monumental cultural ignorance or even some badly concealed discomfort at the hands of the families who shudder that a black ram might be tupping their white ewe?
Such notions are at once comical and tragic. Attitudes are changing, as a more intermingled population matures. Those like Lammy and Iwu will, without doubt, go on to be very successful black politicians. But they will still be very successful black politicians.

 

Mathematical formula predicts whether love will last

0

An Oxford University professor has constructed a formula that can calculate whether newly-married couples will divorce.

James Murray, Professor in Mathematical Biology, recorded newly-weds having a 15 minute phone conversation about a difficult topic, such as money. Positive or negative points were awarded based upon the couple’s interactions, and the scores fed into his formula.

The 700 couples were then re-contacted in yearly intervals over the next 12 years. The formula’s prediction of whether the couples would get divorced turned out to be correct 94% of the time.

Commenting on the results, Prof. Murray said “Some couples may as well get divorced right away”.

Parliamentary visit raises student hackles

0

Students have expressed frustration over the questions and comments of a parliamentary committee toured Oxford over the Easter vacation.

The Innovation, Universities, Science and Skills (IUSS) select committee visited Said Business School and Oxford Brookes on 30th March. While there they grilled a number of students, senior tutors and staff from the two Oxford Universities, including the head of admissions at Oxford, Mike Nicholson.

Much of the questioning focused on Oxford’s admissions policy, and there were questions about Oxford employing targets for state school or ethnic minority admissions.

Students later criticised the committee, with some saying they seemed to have ‘out-dated’ ideas about Oxford.

Jim O’Connell commented: “The MPs seemed quite irritated as, although access schemes were talked about, there isn’t any form of targets or quotas built into the admissions system itself. It definitely sounded as though the MPs were pushing an agenda in this respect, and trying to make out that Oxford isn’t doing enough in terms of access.”

Oxford’s official line on quotas is that the University will not use positive discrimination; all candidates who apply are assessed on their academic merit.

One student said, “It seemed that they had they had come with an intent of writing a story about an Oxford they experienced 20-30 years ago.”

University sources denied that there had been any misunderstanding or controversy at the question sessions. A press Officer said “the government is clear that no University is expected to apply quotas, and Oxford is very clear (in the way that we publish our statistics) about our record”.

Laurence Mills, Magdalen JCR President, said the committee did seem to “take on board” what the students said. Yet while the committee accepted their evidence, the students were frustrated that they had arrived at Oxford with such biased views: “It is an example of a wider perception problem at Oxford.”

The IUSS committee was formed in 2007 to examine the administration, expenditure and policy of the Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills. They have been conducting an inquiry into higher education since October. The inquiry covers admissions, the balance between teaching and research, degree completion and classification, and mechanisms of student support and engagement.

Amongst the MPs on the committee was Dr Evan Harris MP, Liberal Democrat, of Oxford West and Abingdon.

Controversy also broke out when the committee toured Oxford Brookes. The relationship between Oxford’s two universities was discussed, and one student expressed anger over a rumour that Oxford students refer to Brookes as the ELC – Early Learning Centre.

None of the committee were available for comment and the result of their inquiry is yet to be published.

 

Professor Hawking to recover from infection

0

Professor Stephen Hawking, an Oxford-educated scientist, is expected to safely recover from chest infection.

The physicist, who has motor neuron disease, has been rushed in an ambulance to a hospital earlier this week. This is because the infection he has had for two weeks has worsened. His state was described as “very ill”.

However, he is now expected to fully recover.

Cambridge University’s spokesperson said, “Professor Hawking remains in hospital. But he is in a comfortable condition and is expected to make a full recovery.”

Professor Hawking fell ill on a speaking tour of the United States. His condition has not improved since he returned home.

The scientist had been scheduled to speak at Oxford Union this term, but has since pulled out.

 

 

New position in the Union

0

Oxford Union introduced on Monday a new yearly elected position in order to bring long-term planning to the society.

The Guest Liaison Officer will take care of speaker arrangements, oversee the old members’ programme, coordinate office handovers and esnure debate hospitality.

The ratification will take place next week in the Chamber.

Corey Dixon, the president of the Union said, “The Guest Liaison Officer will serve for one year allowing for long term planning. The role will help us in securing even better speakers for the Oxford Union. The role will allow us to continue to build on past successes.”

A member of the Union commented, “This is a good idea, as long as the person elected will actually want to be there to improve the Union rather than hack – they will be there for one year, so it will be harder to keep them accountable.”

 

 

Why the GOP is on a bridge to nowhere

0

They lost the vote only a little over five months ago. They lost power only three months ago. But the current state of the Republican Party is such that it’s hard to see them rebounding for quite some time.

That’s not how they’d see it. They’d tell you that’s where they were a month ago. Now, they argue, they’re back. First, they say, Obama is proving to be the great divider. Poll numbers out this week say quite clearly that now, almost more than ever before, Americans absolutely love or fervently hate the President based on whether or not they identify themselves as Democrats or Republicans. In other words, say the GOP, the President, unlike either Bush, or Reagan, or even Bill Clinton, fails to appeal whatsoever to those who support the opposite party.

(The pollsters say that’s only half the story. What has actually happened is that GOP support has shrunk so much, with so few identifying themselves as Republicans, that the new polls only show what we already knew: that the few hardened believers who are still proud Republicans don’t very much like Obama. The real story is that so many people who used to identify themselves as Republicans now do not.)

Next, they argue that they’ve grasped back the agenda. Some Republicans believe that with all their crowing about the plan to close Guantanamo Bay, with their loud opposition to basic equality for homosexuals, with their odd arguments that Obama is a socialist and, most recently (and ridiculously), that he is a fascist (brilliantly ripped into here), that they are really getting through to people.

Of course these arguments are getting through to some people. It’s just that “some people” only includes the most hardened neocons and the most extreme of the social conservatives. Or, to put it another way, the very few Americans who agreed with what they’re saying in the first place.

Here’s the point. They lost the election because what they said and the way they said it (the weird, anti-intellectual quasi-populism of the Joe the Plumber/Sarah Palin variety) increasingly didn’t chime with the American people, only with the Republican base. And yet their post-election strategy has been only to intensify that trend.

By playing to the most fractious, extreme elements of conservative support — those who watch and agree with Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Bill O’Reilly — they only alienate the rest. And to continue to do so, I think, would be their route to oblivion. As they play more and more to these sorts of opinions, the more they alienate (rather than persuade) the majority, and the less they look like serious people who could be trusted to run the country.

There are many Republicans who recognise that their current path is the wrong one. The problem is that without real leadership in opposition (a consequence, partly, of the American system), it is those who shout the loudest who have the most influence over the direction of the GOP. It is they, not the many moderates within the party, whom the public associate with the Republican brand. It is they who might bring it down.

Senior Congressional Republicans should muster the intelligence as well as the humility to work together to create an alternative picture for the public of what the Republican party is and stands for. And this vision must not be more of the same: The Republican party must change to reflect the changing nature of Americans’ attitudes and needs. Or else, by continuing in the manner of the past few months, it will cease to matter in US politics.

Best Foot Forward

0

Predictions and reactions from Craven Cottage for 2009’s Varsity football match and boat race.

Green green lights given green light

0

I realise that, running this so soon after the article on electric speed bumps, I’m running the risk of turning this into the Cherwell urban road planning ’blog, but local council transport policies have once again made environmental headlines this week.

The big news is that planners can finally support so-called ‘green waves’ of traffic lights, which use sensors in the road to allow smooth-flowing traffic to surf on a wave of consecutive green lights through towns and cities. This should decrease journey times, drivers’ aggro and, because there will be less braking and accelerating, carbon emissions.

Sounds great, doesn’t it? So, er, why weren’t town councils in favour of these before? Well, it turns out that they are forced to cede to a set of centralised Department for Transport guidelines. The new guidelines endorse the green waves, citing their environmental credentials. So, what was the previous policy? BBC News explains:

Previously the Department for Transport had discouraged the systems which reduce fuel use, resulting in less tax being paid to the Treasury.

I wish I had been sipping coffee when I read that, because I would have literally sprayed it all over the computer. Alas, I was reduced to swearing aloud.

There is obviously a degree of pointlessness in getting irate over guidelines which have just been revoked…but this advice is so egregiously batshit insane that I think it’s worth dwelling on. Official government guidelines explicitly obliged councils to inconvenience the public as much as possible in order to charge them for the privilege.

If the government need to raise taxes, and I am not so naïvely right-wing that I cannot countenance this possibility, then please put a percentage point on income tax—or even fuel duty—don’t waste our time and petrol just to tax us on the latter! Of all the horrendous stealth taxes, this is surely the most triumphantly idiotic. It’s like forcing people to take up smoking in order to boost government coffers. (Ha ha, I am funny. Coffers, coughers, geddit?! Oh, screw you.)

And how late is this advice being repealed? In 2009, after decades of persistent whingeing from environmentalists, the government finally abolishes a policy which actively requires road planners to increase emissions in order to plump up the public purse. What next, encouraging rampant consumerism to boost tax revenue on useless plastic shit? Oh, wait.

I hope you too are seething with resentment at an institution which can set out guidelines mandating public inconvenience and environmental catastrophe in order to scrape together a few extra pennies.

However, though I am glad to see the back of the previous ludicrous legislation in principle, I’m not so sure in practice. These more efficient traffic control algorithms will allow us to squeeze more vehicles onto the road, and the only law in road planning is that no matter how much extra capacity you create, it will be filled. Plus, if you don’t want people to drive in towns, making it as annoying as possible due to perverse, irrational traffic signals could be a good thing: lowering the irritation barrier may mean that those extra spaces on the road are filled quicker than you’d imagine.

Strangely, then, it might well be better to return to the previous, annoying stipulation—but crucially, if we did, it should be on the principle that it advances the greater good. We should add up the pros and cons of the various different solutions—environmental, economic and taxation—and choose the one which makes the World as good as it can be. There must never be a place in government for laws which make things worse in order to reap the tax revenue.

Endnotes: Unwrapping Books

0

Timed to coincide with the Sunday Times Literary Festival at Christ Church College, the O3 Gallery’s Endnotes exhibition saw sixteen artists present their interpretations of the connection between visual art and literature. The artists were given one or two books withdrawn from Oxford Central Library and drawing inspiration from them, they created artworks in media ranging from photography to basket making. One of the curators, Diane Jones-Parry, explains the motivations behind the exhibition: ” The exhibition was…designed to celebrate the value and importance of books and libraries when county, school and local libraries are under threat.” The artists were chosen for their diversity in preferred medium, age, and gender, reflecting, the curators claim, the diversity of library-goers and readers.

The effectiveness of the exhibits was as diverse as the artists that created them. Some were successful, for example, a short film by Jim le Fevre in the form of a flipbook, made from a book about movie stars, that showed the journey from Oxford Central Library to the gallery itself. The medium was a nod to the book’s original content, while the work elicited a pleasant ‘isn’t that clever’ feeling in the viewer. Similarly, another film by Laurence Halstead which used live action and stop-motion techniques, showed us a man’s effort to digest an airport novel. Literally. The film succeeds in providing viewers with a metaphor that has numerous avenues of interpretation. Perhaps the artist may have struggled his way through the novel (hence the hilarious title “Reader’s indigestion”) or maybe he is making a general statement about our position as consumers, rather than genuine appreciators, of literature. And the film itself was rather entertaining too – how often do you get to see a man eat a book?

Unfortunately, not all the works were quite as good. Some felt random and lazy, like the sculpture that sat in the middle of the floor that was entirely composed of a series of photocopies stapled together. And there were others that were just perplexing – a series of pages tied up in neat little parcels, for example. One felt that the exhibits could be divided into two categories: one that took either the content of the books or the link between the artist’s chosen medium and literature as genuine inspiration, and the other that simply took the books and did something (or anything, in fact) with them without acknowledging the unusual remit set out by the curators.

In sum, possibly worth a look if you’re into this sort of thing. And if you leave disappointed, there’s always doughnuts at the Krispy Kreme nearby to cheer you up.

 

 

Alzheimer’s influence seen at age 20?

0

Oxford neuroscience was splashed across the media this week with new research suggesting that atypical brain activity, caused by a high-risk Alzheimer’s disease gene, can be spotted as early as age twenty.

The study was performed in collaboration with Imperial College London and is published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Science. It shows a significant correlation between having the high-risk mutation of the gene in question, ApoE4, and a raised level of activity in the hippocampus, the part of the brain involved in memory formation. The researchers suggest that over-activity may simply wear that part of the brain out, leading to damage, and memory problems, in later life.

Alzheimer’s disease is a headline-grabber, and BBC News, The Telegraph and The Daily Mail (to name but a few) reported the findings accordingly. They detailed how this work could bring us close to a simple method of identifying those at increased risk of dementia early enough to offer prophylactic treatment.

However, these media reports are misleading. Firstly, the most important link that would allow the conclusions above to be drawn has not been demonstrated at all: we do not know whether this increased hippocampal activity is in fact linked to the actual development of Alzheimer’s disease or not.

MRI brain scan

Of course, it would take an investigation spanning half a century to show whether these mutation-carrying participants with increased brain activity at age 20-30 are more likely to develop dementia at age 70-80. But without evidence of this sort, it is entirely premature to suggest that this increased activity could be a helpful diagnostic tool.

And similarly, without this evidence, it is also premature for both the researchers and the media reports to say that over-activity in the hippocampus could be “effectively wearing it out”.

Secondly, even if it were to be shown that this higher activity is indeed linked to the future development of dementia, the diagnostic brain-scanning of all 20-30 year-olds with the rogue gene (around 25% of them) would be anything but the “simple test” that some of the articles would have you believe. These functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scans take about an hour to do and are very expensive: around £1500 a pop, plus the million quid you need to buy the scanner in the first place. Furthermore, these scans would have to exclude many potential participants, such as women who are pregnant, or could be pregnant, and anyone with metal inside their body, from a pacemaker to a surgical staple.

Lastly, even if this were a practical method of screening, an the ethical queston is raised by distinguishing, at an early age, those who are more likely to go on to develop Alzheimer’s disease. Fair enough, people found to be at risk could be offered early treatment and lifestyle advice. Unfortunately, there is currently no successful “early” or preventative treatment available, and neither do we know which lifestyle factors contribute to increased risk of Alzheimer’s disease, beyond the usual “drink less, eat less, exercise more” mantra that we should all be following in any case to avoid obesity and its associated health problems. The benefit of potential protective treatment must outweigh the emotional stress that could follow the discovery that one is at increased risk of a nasty brain disease.

Again, the glossy media portrayal of a medical panacea unravels; but science has acquired another small piece in the puzzle of Alzheimer’s pathology.