Friday, May 2, 2025
Blog Page 220

Leader: BeReal has the potential to change student social media usage for the better

If there’s anything that defined my teenage years and early adulthood, it’s Instagram. I try as hard as I can to resist the shallow stereotypes associated with people and especially women who avidly use social media, but when the acquisition of Instagram by Facebook coincided neatly with my entry into secondary school, it’s difficult to deny the influence it’s had over the last decade of my life.

We experienced in real time the development of Instagram from place where Year Sevens deposited photos as mundane as a blurry shot of their Starbucks, to the home of the circa-2018 incessant Boomerangs of people’s first legal drinks, to the glorified flea market-with-a-messaging-function it’s become today. For a while, I thought this app would continue to be a protagonist in my life indefinitely, and that I would continue to ask myself whether a given moment worked better as a grid post or a story, but somehow this past term has changed my attitude. I still use social media, but  instead of meticulously planning Instagram story content, I merely wait for the BeReal notification.

On paper, BeReal doesn’t sound particularly revolutionary. There’s the central gimmick of the daily notification at a randomised time (in my experience, anywhere between 10am and 10pm), but beyond that it has the potential to become as homogeneous as Instagram, just in a different way. Instead of posed pre-bop pictures in student kitchens, we get hundreds of pictures of people’s essay crises in the Rad Cam from different angles. 

But the randomly timed notification, at least for me, makes all the difference. BeReal, along with Wordle and other late-pandemic phenomena, only happens once a day and thus has an inherent mechanism to control addictive behaviours, but it is not only parents scaremongering about phone addictions to whom this feature might appeal. When one only feels obligated to post one photo per day, the pressure to document every single second partially disappears and my brain can more easily switch off content-hunting mode. 

Conversely, BeReal places a healthy amount of pressure on that one crucial picture, which deters me from wasting time far better than an impending essay deadline ever could – the app has taught me to be conscious of whatever I’m doing at the present moment just in case that notification happens to strike, and also to see value in smaller moments that aren’t conventionally ‘Instagrammable’. We can also live peacefully in the knowledge that the potential for data breaches is low; the data an app can accumulate from random daily snapshots is surely less than Instagram’s highly curated, consistent displays of its users’ interests.

As well as taking the pressure off of social media, BeReal also helps us have a more healthy relationship with external validation. Even though one can ‘like’ (or rather ‘react to’) a post on BeReal much as they would on Instagram, I understand from the outset that my picture of my laptop screen as I research flights for my summer holiday is not particularly exciting, so my expectations are low and I don’t mind that the only people who regularly react are my boyfriend, parents and a couple of friends. The concept of taking a picture of whatever’s in front of you is worlds away from the agonising process of selecting what to post from an Instagram photoshoot; when the bar is already on the ground for how interesting the content needs to be or how attractive you need to look, then the expectation for people’s effusive reactions are equally low.

Time will tell whether the lessons to be learned from BeReal will stick, or whether it will be remembered as Trinity 2022’s passing fad. But in the meantime, each day I will stay healthily detached from social media until the notification strikes. 

Wycombe Wanderers Season Round-Up – A Rollercoaster Ride to Wembley

0

For me, the world finally felt like it was returning to some semblance of normality as I travelled down to Devon on a balmy Tuesday evening in early August last year. Although I had seen Wycombe Wanderers begin the season with a relatively comfortable home victory over Accrington Stanley three days earlier, the long journey down to Exeter for a Carabao Cup first-round tie represented a much-anticipated return to an activity that had been sorely missing from my life since the end of February 2020: watching Wycombe play away.

On that late winter’s day in 2020, I took a train up from Oxford to South Yorkshire to see Wanderers lose meekly 3-1 against Doncaster Rovers. At the time, the result felt miserable for a whole host of reasons. Of most concern, coronavirus had been looming menacingly over Europe for a few weeks, and after reading a handful of pessimistic articles on Twitter I had already convinced myself of the tragic loss of life to come, as well as the inevitability of the associated lockdowns and social restrictions. Consequently, as my brothers and I trudged out of Doncaster’s Keepmoat Stadium into the fading daylight, I had a strong intuition that I wouldn’t be stepping foot inside a football ground for quite some time.

Besides the global public health situation, however, matters on the pitch also brought little cause for celebration. After a blistering start to the 2019-20 League One campaign, Wycombe – boasting the second-smallest budget in the third tier of English football – had found ourselves in an unlikely position at the top of the table at the turn of the year. However, a post-Christmas slump brought the team and fans back to reality with a hefty bump, to the extent that defeat at “Donny” represented the fifth consecutive away loss that I had attended and the seventh without a win. This included a series of dreadful performances in freezing temperatures against Portsmouth (0-2), Sunderland (0-4), and Milton Keynes (0-2). In fact, we only won one of the ten away games I managed to take in that season and scored just four goals in the process. Thus, it would be an understatement to suggest that 2019-20 hadn’t been a particularly enjoyable year to follow Wycombe around the country.

Given the abject record described above, a rational reader might question quite why I felt so excited to be sitting in the back of a mate’s car on my way to Exeter, in order to recommence a largely futile and somewhat costly endeavour? The first part of the answer to such a question lies with the events of the intervening 18 months, which had transformed my hometown team into an entirely new proposition. As predicted, Wycombe didn’t play another game after the Doncaster loss before the burgeoning Covid crisis forced the abandonment of the remainder of the regular football season. Fortuitously, however, although Wanderers had been left sitting in 8th position when the league was curtailed, after much debate, drama, and throwing-of-toys-out-of-prams by certain clubs (*cough* Peterborough *cough*), the English Football League (EFL) eventually decided to determine the league’s final standings by ranking teams according to their average points-per-game. Incredibly, because Wycombe had played fewer games than the five teams directly above us, this formula catapulted the Blues up into 3rd place and secured us a spot in the playoffs. In addition, despite entering these post-season playoff games as heavy underdogs, the Chairboys (our furniture industry inspired nickname) gratefully took advantage of this big slice of luck by beating first Fleetwood Town, and then local rivals Oxford United at an empty Wembley Stadium to seal promotion to the Championship. Whilst the club’s first-ever appearance in the second division of English football sadly took place behind-closed-doors and ended with controversial relegation – just one point from safety behind financial wrongdoers Derby County – the strengthened squad and bolstered budget acquired during our foray into the league above had set the team up nicely for another push at promotion.

As it happened, my pre-season optimism did not seem particularly well-placed during a thoroughly anti-climactic 90 minutes of football against Exeter, which of course ended in a drab goalless draw. Moreover, those of us in attendance at St James Park witnessed a grand total of four Wycombe players limp off injured over the course of the contest. Sadly, this casualty count included legendary captain Matt Bloomfield, who sustained a severe concussion which forced him into premature retirement after 18 years of service to the club. Thankfully though, the night ended on a high note for us hardy visiting supporters, as Wanderers won a topsy-turvy penalty shootout to progress to the next round, with veteran ex-Premier League goalkeeper David “Stocko” Stockdale the hero. The charismatic Yorkshireman saved an Exeter penalty to keep us in the tie, got to his feet to thump his own attempt into the top corner, then promptly returned to his natural position to save another opposition spot-kick and spark some long-awaited limbs in the away terrace. As my mates and I traipsed back to the car along Exeter’s narrow Victorian streets chanting “We all dream of a team of David Stockdales” (to the tune of The Beatles’ Yellow Submarine), I realised that the football drug was back again. And it hadn’t taken much to hook me.

Fortunately for this relapsed addict, the next football fix wasn’t far away. In fact, I was soon feeling a bit like Tony Montana in his Scarface mansion, because the round trip to the West Country marked merely the beginning of a mini nationwide odyssey facilitated by the fixture Gods, who had scheduled two more away league matches over the subsequent seven days. Like London buses, after what seemed like an eternity of being unable to watch a Wycombe away game, three turned up at once. On the following Saturday, Wanderers won 3-1 at sunny Cheltenham courtesy of two late goals from teenage talent Olly Pendlebury in front of a packed-out away end, allowing me the first taste of an away league win since October 2019. And journeys to these two well-heeled southern towns were then followed by an iconic visit to eventual league winners Wigan Athletic, where Chairboys centre-back Anthony Stewart headed home a completely undeserved last-minute equaliser to trigger delirium amongst the 337 Wycombe-ites who had braved the M6 on a wet midweek evening.

Fittingly, this week-long August road trip perfectly highlighted the most important (yet somewhat counter-intuitive) factor behind the excitement I experienced at the prospect of following my team around the nation again: the non-footballing element. In short – and I mean this is the least patronising way possible – there truly isn’t a better way to see large swathes of England that one would never normally have any motive to visit, and hence meet a range of people from entirely different backgrounds whom one wouldn’t ordinarily have any chance of crossing paths with. Furthermore, away days provide the ideal excuse for keeping in regular contact with siblings and mates from home, whilst offering a fantastic medium for creating new memories and shared experiences. Accordingly, our excursions to random towns and cities across the nation have produced a string of stories and anecdotes, whilst leaving impressions of places and groups of people that I wouldn’t otherwise have any idea about.

Such a point was exemplified in Wigan, where the locals could not have been more hospitable. As an example of this, our pre-match meal at a nearby Indian restaurant was greatly animated by a truly unforgettable fellow customer, who insisted on serving us our food and drinks despite not actually working at the establishment. Rather, it was soon revealed that this character frequented the place at least four times a week (often with his “little lad”) and had basically become an unofficial part of the waiting staff. I genuinely cannot ever recall coming across a more enthusiastically friendly stranger. Later on as we left the Latics’ DW Stadium in a buoyant mood, my already positive opinion of Wigan was further reinforced by a Lancashire lad of about 15, who thoughtfully came over to shake all of our hands and wish us a safe journey home. This gesture was touching, especially from someone so young, and must have taken some mental fortitude given the galling nature of the stoppage-time sucker punch suffered by his team.

Ironically, however, what the well-mannered youth didn’t realise was that we had no intention of heading back south that night at all. Instead, we embarked upon a very soggy trek into the town centre along the Leeds-Liverpool Canal, straight past George Orwell’s famous Wigan Pier (a more stereotypically “Northern” landmark could not be envisaged), and into a cracking little railway-themed pub called Wigan Central. Once drying off inside with a few pints between us, we realised that we’d happened to sit down alongside a group of men who’d had the privilege of being that evening’s official matchday sponsors. Fortunately, a more welcoming bunch would be tough to find! After regaling us with nostalgia-fuelled stories about happier times gone by (the 2013 FA Cup Final win against Man City featured most prominently), these Wigan supporters encouraged us to pose for a photo with a framed, squad-signed t-shirt that had been gifted to them by their club, and then suggested going for further drinks at The Boulevard – Wigan’s premier late-night entertainment venue.

Despite politely declining this offer, by coincidence, the route back to our overnight digs took us straight past the entrance to this relatively underwhelming nightclub, which nonetheless tempted two of our party into a quick change of heart. And although I wisely decided not to join their spontaneous clubbing trip, a room key misunderstanding soon forced me back out into the rain to rescue my mates from a night on the streets. Both were found in a much worse state than they’d been left in a few minutes earlier, and one had to be peeled away from a passionate conversation with two bemused but good-natured Scousers, who were no doubt thankful to be saved from further incoherent ramblings about the evils of Liverpool FC. As one would expect, the drive back home the next morning was not especially pleasant for those who’d indulged in too much alcohol. Nevertheless, it’s fair to say that Wigan will now forever be associated with positive memories of the people and the place!

Building upon this promising start to the League One campaign, Wycombe’s on-field success continued as the season progressed. Consistent wins at home were backed up by solid performances away from Adams Park, including combative 0-0 draws against both Oxford United (hopefully one of my final visits to the miserable Kassam Stadium) and Rotherham United during the Autumn. More memorable however was the Tuesday night trip up to the Etihad Stadium for a Carabao Cup third-round tie against Pep Guardiola’s Manchester City in September. The huge gulf in finances and quality between the two clubs was blindingly obvious, as City eased to a 6-1 victory orchestrated by the likes of Kevin de Bruyne, Phil Foden, and Riyadh Mahrez. Nevertheless, the resounding end result will never detract from the moment of pure elation experienced when striker Brandon Hanlan tapped in a scrappy opening goal to put Wanderers in front against the reigning Premier League champions. The celebrations as the ball hit the back of the next were truly something special to behold, and the roar from the 3000+ visiting supporters in the away end will stay with me forever. After Christmas, a poor loss at Ipswich’s Portman Road was followed by an impressive win over Charlton at The Valley on New Year’s Day, to start 2022 with a bang. Furthermore, despite yet another collapse in form during February, my presence in the stands seemed to act as something of a good luck charm for the team, who remained undefeated in every match I managed to attend during the remainder of the regular season. This included late equalisers at Lincoln and Wimbledon, battling draws at Portsmouth and Gillingham, as well as an outstanding 4-1 demolition of Cambridge.

Outside of this considerable on-field success, my travels across the nation this year could once again be summarised by a series of snapshots of places, people, and events that greatly enriched the actual football-watching experience. Examples include: sitting in a grotty independent pub in Rotherham town centre where a local complained to me about the price of a pint rising to £1.50 (it had been £1.40 the week before!). My brother parking his Ford Fiesta in a bush outside the Kassam because the car park was full and kick-off was imminent. Wycombe’s administrative staff forgetting to bring our pre-bought tickets along with them to Cheltenham, forcing us to miss the first few minutes whilst they printed off spares. Getting my overnight rucksack confiscated by stewards at Man City for literally no reason whatsoever, and then having to pay City’s multi-billionaire owners £10 to retrieve it at the end of the game (I’m still fuming about that one to be honest!). Enjoying a perfect view of The Shard from a London Bridge beer garden on our way back from Charlton. Seeing Wycombe’s maverick American owner Pete Couhig order a round of 60 jagerbombs for all of the away fans huddled around the bar at a pub in Portsmouth. Receiving a personal tour of Pembroke College, Cambridge, from an old undergraduate mate who had recently made the dubious decision to relocate from Oxford to the Fens. Visiting the Fleur de Lis in Gillingham, which ironically may be perhaps the most Brexity pub in England despite its elegant French name. And experiencing AFC Wimbledon’s notorious SWAT-like security team, who made the Wombles’ brand-new Plough Lane stadium feel like a scene out of Escape to Victory.

The upshot of all this travelling and ball-kicking was that Wycombe went into the last match of the season riding the crest of an eleven-game unbeaten run, including vital home victories over fellow playoff contenders Plymouth Argyle and Sheffield Wednesday during the preceding weeks. However, despite accumulating 80 points from these first 45 games – a total that would have guaranteed a League One play-off place in virtually every previous campaign since they were introduced in 1987 – the Chairboys entered the final day showdown against Burton Albion outside of the coveted top 6 positions. Instead, after an ultra-competitive run-in, Wanderers found ourselves in seventh, level on points with Plymouth (but with a slightly inferior goal difference), one point behind Sunderland, and two behind Sheffield Wednesday. Therefore, because only three of these four clubs could make the end-of-season playoffs, we required at least one of the others to slip up elsewhere, even if we won our own game. Despite the precariousness of the situation, 1600 Wanderers supporters travelled up to Staffordshire in an expectant mood, accompanied by hundreds of photo-booth style inflatables which were gleefully chucked around the sold-out away terrace. Moreover, one enterprising fan had also organised the distribution of 250 cardboard face masks depicting the distinctive face and unkempt curls of Wycombe’s much-loved manager Gareth Ainsworth, which further added to the surreal nature of the crowd.

With 83 different outcomes possible before the final round of fixtures kicked off simultaneously across the country, a tense 90 minutes of checking scores on phones and complex mathematical permutations had been anticipated. Thankfully though for any of us with a nervous disposition, the afternoon could hardly have unfolded in a more relaxing way for those of a Wycombe persuasion. By half-time, playoff rivals Plymouth had dramatically imploded at home to Milton Keynes Dons, finding themselves three goals down and reduced to ten men. In contrast, former Wales international forward Sam Vokes had put Wycombe 1-0 up just before the break with his 16th strike of the season – a trademark bullet header from a Joe Jacobson corner. Consequently, not even a second-half equaliser for our hosts could dampen the party atmosphere generated by those in blue behind the Burton goalposts, as Plymouth eventually succumbed to a horrific 5-0 defeat. In fact, a late winner from Wanderers left-back Jordan Obita proved entirely inconsequential, apart from providing one last regular-season celebration for the Chairboys fans in attendance. After escaping Burton’s Pirelli Stadium with an inflatable orange guitar as a souvenir of the day, a joyous few hours in this agreeable little Midlands market town followed. Burton-upon-Trent is famous for its breweries, and the town centre boasts a pub on almost every corner. Needless to say, I eventually caught my train back to Oxford with some degree of reluctance, although the journey home was greatly improved by a chat with a Nottingham Forest fan sat next to me, who shared a mutual disdain for Derby County.

Quickly on to the playoff semi-finals then, which saw Wanderers come up against an MK Dons side in red-hot form, as highlighted by the thrashing they had handed out to poor old Plymouth just four days earlier. Before continuing further, I will freely state that I despise Milton Keynes far more than any other club in the world (please Google their “history” if you want to understand why), and thus the prospect of losing to our controversial county rivals in these playoff games was highly unpalatable. Happily for me though, Wycombe’s players clearly thought something similar, as they produced one of the all-time great Wanderers performances to come away with a 2-0 lead from the home leg of the two-match encounter. MK’s talented players were clearly rattled as Adams Park was transformed into a hostile cauldron of noise, the like of which I’d never experienced before, and our opponents struggled to impose any of their much-vaunted silky passing style that had taken them to third place in the league table.

Three days later, the second leg at Stadium MK proved to be an entirely different ball game (both literally and metaphorically), as our North Bucks opposition finally showed why they’d had such a successful year by putting on one of the most dominant displays you will ever see in football. However, despite conceding an early goal and then being subjected to the equivalent of an attack versus defence training session for the best part of two hours, the Wycombe boys – backed by an unbelievable away atmosphere – heroically clung on for a 1-0 defeat and hence a 2-1 aggregate victory. I have never attended a football match anywhere near as stressful as that one, and I doubt I ever will again. Several heart attacks were narrowly avoided as the Wanderers goal just about withstood a monumental siege, and I won’t hesitate to admit that the outpouring of emotion sparked by the final whistle left me on the verge of tears. Poetically, MK had done us a huge favour by allowing us into the playoffs in the first place, only to suffer elimination at our very own hands. In direct contrast, Wycombe were off to Wembley! The result could not have tasted any sweeter.

And so on to the playoff final. The last hurdle at the end of a marathon campaign. An all-or-nothing fixture. Mighty Sunderland lay in wait for Wycombe after overcoming Sheffield Wednesday in the other semi. Sunderland, a Premier League sized club with a Premier League standard stadium and a Premier League quality fanbase, who had nonetheless been confined to the third tier of English football for four frustrating years after prolonged mismanagement resulted in a rapid decline. 73,000 spectators would be present, the second-largest crowd at a Wycombe fixture ever, behind only the FA Amateur Cup Final in 1957 (also at Wembley). Games don’t come much bigger than this!

Finally, after slogging through two agonisingly slow-moving weeks, the big day arrived. A direct train from Oxford to Wembley was followed by a raucous few hours in The Torch public house, and then a walk down Wembley Way to the most iconic football stadium in the world. We went inside, took our seats, sang the national anthem, and watched the match kick-off. Then, in what felt like the blink of an eye, it was suddenly all over. Wycombe had lost 2-0, the result was comprehensive, and the better team had deservedly won. There was no doubt about it. We had saved one of our poorest showings of the year for the biggest game of all, and a fairy-tale ending for Wanderers’ 40-year-old retiring legend Adebayo Akinfenwa never looked close to materialising. After all that, Wycombe would be staying in the same division next year.

As the final blast of the referee’s whistle signalled an end to the 2021-22 season, I slumped down in my seat. Dejected. Heartbroken. Empty. I thought about the thousands of miles of road/rail travelled, the hundreds of pounds spent on tickets/fuel, and the tens of pints consumed. I thought of the time passed with the best of friends, and the fleeting acquaintances with strangers from all over the country who I’ll never meet again. I thought of the highs and the lows, the agony and the ecstasy, the boredom and the drama spanning from Exeter in early August to Wembley in late May, and everywhere else in between. Had it all been for seemingly nothing?

Don’t be silly, of course, it hadn’t! In fact, as 50,000 jubilant Sunderland fans poured their heart into a truly spine-tingling rendition of their club anthem, Elvis Presley’s Can’t Help Falling in Love, the sentimental lyrics particularly resonated with me as they reverberated around England’s famous national stadium:

Wise men say

Only fools rush in

But I can’t help falling in love with you

Call me a fool if you want, but I’d fallen in love with Wycombe Wanderers again. Therefore, it had been worth every single second. Besides, there’ll always be next season…!

Images: Sam Day

A New Dawn For English Cricket?

0

When New Zealand and England get the northern Test summer underway at Lord’s on the second of June, it will be, at first, easy to imagine that not much has changed. After all, it was on the very same day of 2021 that the same two sides played the first Test of that summer. However, any feelings of déjà-vu will likely be dispelled at approximately 10:30 on Thursday, when Ben Stokes – England’s newest, and eighty-first, men’s Test captain – will meet his opposite number in the middle for his first toss since being appointed to the role permanently in April. 

Indeed, so much has happened since England and New Zealand played out a slightly dull draw at Lord’s last year that it already feels like a different era – not least because Lord’s was this time able to offer tickets for a full house, although a combination of the Platinum Jubilee, and ticket prices touching £160, have meant that there will likely be more than a few empty seats this time around as well.

That last match was a disappointing affair, a timid draw in which a weak England team betrayed its own limitations in failing to attempt to chase 273 off 75 overs – a display that left fans’ confidence in the England team badly shaken. Although the agonising defeats that followed that match will linger longer in the memory, England’s game management in what was the first game in front of spectators in almost two years proved a damaging misjudgement; had the players been anywhere other than the drowsy surroundings of a sunny Sunday afternoon at Lord’s, they may well have found a few boos mixed in with the polite applause that was given when a draw was finally agreed.

However, if there is any leadership team designed to ward off fears of a repeat of that match, it must be Ben Stokes and Brendon McCullum, the latter the new red-ball men’s head coach. The former is England’s Superman, fresh off setting the record for most sixes in a County Championship innings, the man behind some of cricket’s most exciting and dramatic innings of recent years; the latter was for a decade New Zealand’s most explosive player, a man who scored the quickest Test hundred of all time. 

Both too have a good template for the future. Each will well remember another, very different encounter between England at New Zealand at Lord’s – a thrilling match in 2015 that began with England reduced to 30/4 and ended with a 124-run win. McCullum was then New Zealand’s captain, and suffered the ignominy of being dismissed first ball by his new captain; Stokes was player of the match, with the fastest Test hundred Lord’s has ever seen to show for it. Despite the loss, the example that McCullum’s captaincy provided on that tour has been credited with launching the England team on a run that reclaimed the Ashes later that summer. 

Now, seven years later, England’s eyes will be on Brendon McCullum once again. There are, of course, no guarantees that a match like that will be repeated, but the combination of a new coach and captain beginning their jobs together is rare enough to be exciting. How the two work together will go a long way to defining the Test team’s new dawn – and, with each determined to focus on the present, and with each possessing a mandate for change and a reputation for a quick-scoring, white-knuckle cricketing philosophy, Test cricket under the Stokes-McCullum regime – wherever it takes the flawed and fragile team that they now lead –will certainly be worth the watch.

Image: CC 2.0John Sutton via Geograph

President and Treasurer attempt to oust each other as Magdalen JCR goes to double no-confidence vote

0

Turmoil has descended on the Magdalen College JCR, as drama over the weekend culminated in two no-confidence votes being brought against leading members of the committee. JCR president Daniel Dipper and his treasurer are set to be challenged in competing votes between 18:00 and 20:00 this evening, during the last General Meeting (GM) of term.  

The controversy began after a series of alleged derelictions of duty by Treasurer Julian Müller.  Several people within and outside of the JCR claim to have suffered from a repayment process that either took too long or didn’t take place at all. Some committee members have waited up to one month for payment and at least three have gone into their overdraft. Müller told Cherwell, “While it is true that there have been a small number of payments later than usual, due to one missed weekend of reimbursements, and I did and do apologise to those affected by this, it is not true that payments did not take place at all.”

Following “long-term discussions” with multiple committee members, including Vice-President Henry Kay, President Dipper took the decision to bring a vote of no-confidence against Müller last week. Kay told Cherwell these discussions involved “tangible dissatisfaction with the Treasurer.”  Normal conventions would have seen the Vice-President conduct the vote but, with Kay unable to attend, Dipper was obliged to conduct proceedings.  

Rules demand that in circumstances such as this the vote must be conducted by show of hands with only those present allowed a say.  However, Dipper broke from these conventions by permitting members to vote by proxy and in secret.  Subsequently, the result of no-confidence was contested by Müller.

Müller told Cherwell, “At the committee meeting that was supposed to determine whether I was found to be in dereliction of duty (a term that does not even exist in our constitution, but in the constitution of the union), the president acted as chair of the meeting, interpreter of the constitution, and also prosecutor, as he brought forward the allegations against me. Regarding the voting procedures, he did not only break from voting conventions, but in fact broke with the constitution, by allowing proxy votes and a secret ballot, both of which are explicitly not permitted by the constitution.”

This saw the Vice-President Henry Kay obliged to bring a motion of no-confidence against Dipper himself, meaning that two votes will now take place in tonight’s GM.  The meeting is expected to be packed to the rafters, with the events sparking debate across the college community.

When approached for comment, Müller told Cherwell “Ultimately, the controversy arose because the President, instead of seeking constructive dialogue or making use of other measures provided by the constitution for such situations (such as “Censure of a committee member”), decided to directly initiate removal from office proceedings, something which has been unprecedented in our JCR for at least the past 5 years, and is ultimately seen by many as un-constructive and perhaps politically motivated.”

The ramifications of the deposing of the President are set to be widespread. A source close to the JCR suggested to Cherwell that Dipper’s de-facto successor Henry Kay isn’t interested in the role of president and would resign if forced to take it up. Kay told Cherwell: “I can’t confirm or deny whether I would resign, I have strong reasons for both taking and declining the role. Maybe unwilling, but also wanting to do what’s best for the JCR.”  

Dipper, voted Oxford’s number one BNOC earlier this term, has been praised by some for his levels of commitment. He told Cherwell: “Throughout my tenure I feel I have gone above and beyond for the JCR, sometimes clocking up as many as 70 hours in a week as JCR President and working 20 hour days. I have campaigned to improve sexual violence processes which will be put in place over the summer, so Magdalen can hopefully be the best college in the university for tackling and preventing sexual violence. This change was anticipated to take years and has been delivered in less than 6 months. I fulfilled the vast majority of my pledges within the first 6 weeks of my election. I sent an email as soon as I became aware of the impeachment.”

Over the weekend he wrote to JCR members: “I write to you having received notification of a motion of no confidence in myself, to be discussed in the General Meeting on Monday. As President, my role is to represent all students, and I will continue to do so to the best of my abilities. It is crucial to respond to any concerns as a matter of urgency. I stand by my achievements and conduct in office. I am therefore making myself available over the next two days through open hours.”

The result and the fate of the Magdalen JCR will be known by this evening. However, the ramifications are likely to play out in the much longer term.

This article was updated at 17:21 06/06/22 to reflect comment from Treasurer Julian Müller.

Image: Ed Webster/CC BY 2.0 via Wikimedia Commons

Main Character Syndrome

0

We are obsessed with appearances. A browse through any of Oxford’s student newspapers or Facebook groups will make this clear: even life’s banalities have become a performance. The library is as much an opportunity to look sexy and mysterious, couched in panelled oak and dim lighting, as it is a place for reluctant study. Tesco is a place to look either immaculately put-together, or indeed to look un-put-together, but in a managed and seductive way. Though we may try to maintain an ironic distance when we repeat such notions as ‘being the main character’, there are only so many times that something can be said ironically before it reveals a latent truth.

The truth is that we have become accustomed to seeing ourselves through other people’s eyes – to reading our own external appearance for meaning and consistency, and editing it where necessary. This cycle generates self-awareness to the point of paralysis, as we learn to pre-empt judgement from other people, and adjust our behaviour accordingly, even when in an act of naïve pleasure we are not seeking to elicit it. If I take a Penguin Classic to a coffee shop, does this make me look erudite, or does it make me look as though I am trying to look erudite?

It is only in a digital culture that we could ever be so suffocatingly self-aware. Not only because we are constantly confronted with our own image, but also because the image which we are expected to project of ourselves must appear authentic despite being curated, and meaningful despite its fleetingness. Generations past also had to bear in mind that they were being perceived, but they did not have to confront this perception – this alternate self – in digital form, and were not expected to generate it so consistently. Nor did they encounter other people in such form.

The impulse to create more compelling representations of our own lives is indicative of how we increasingly resemble the things we buy. We have always ascribed to commodities a ‘meaning’ beyond their use: fashion brands would not be viable if the bits of fabric they sold us (no more objectively valuable than unbranded bits of fabric) were not associated with some kind of ‘lifestyle’. Now we deploy the same logic in order to market ourselves to potential friends, followers and employers: we mould ourselves, for example, as socialites or activists. In the process, we incorporate many of the consumer choices we have been taught to associate with what we take ourselves to be.

“Main character syndrome” represents the attempt to narrativize this digital personality. To be the main character is to construct an account of the world in which you are simultaneously the active subject in your own story and the object of everyone else’s perception. In this sense, we mimic celebrities, the original people-as-commodities, who are held up as society’s protagonists. The public image of celebrities reflects far more closely the prejudices of the media and the morbid curiosity of their fans than it does the complex reality of their lives as individuals. Similarly, any attempt at ‘main characterhood’ will end up accounting for what we think other people think our lives should look like, rather than what they actually are. If accounts of celebrity are to be believed, then the experience of leaning into, and in a sense becoming, the representation, is a suffocating and alienating one.

If life as a self-aware, self-stylising main character really is as unedifying as I describe, then why is it that so many of us seem to take pleasure in it? It has perhaps to do with the attempt to impose meaning on our lives. Most of us are preparing to be fired down the same well-trodden career paths as previous generations, and to be measured against the same standards of success, without any of the certainties. There seems something rather jarring about finding meaning in any of the things we might traditionally have turned to – a vocation, a political cause, or a family – at a time of social fragmentation, collapsing living standards and looming ecological catastrophe. In the face of meaninglessness and disempowerment, maybe it is only natural that we relocate ourselves within our own narratives and flatter ourselves with the thought that we are being perceived, if only because that would mean that other people found our lives meaningful.

Confronted with such all-consuming self-awareness and mutual surveillance, which at times makes the Rad Cam feel like a panopticon, we would do well to remember that most people are too busy thinking about being perceived to actually perceive anyone else. We will never find the meaning we are looking for in our lives by trying to embody the images we construct of ourselves, which will only ever be poor and insufficient approximations of who it is we really want to be. Instead, we should behave in a way that is not contingent on the perception of others, and critically confront the digital apparatus which makes living an authentic life harder than it ever has been.

Further Delays to Reuben College After Asbestos Discovery

0

The project to build the new Reuben College now faces further delays well into 2023 after builders discovered asbestos in wall plaster.

Oxford’s newest college, which will be the first new one to open in more than 30 years, was due to be handed over to the university this year but that will now have to wait until at least Easter 2023.  Developer Morgan Sindall Construction has led the project which involves refurbishing the Grade II listed building that used to be home to the Science Library on South Parks Road.  

The new post-graduate college was announced in 2018 and work began in 2020 off the back of a £71m investment from the ‘Reuben Foundation’.  Its principal aim will be ‘to foster interdisciplinary research and its innovative designs for its communal spaces and quads have received acclaimed from various architecture specialists.  

Owing to the age of the building thought, the refurbishment was always going to be an ambitious one to undertake without delays and those early worries have now been realised.  The builders on sight are said to have discovered ‘significant amounts of asbestos’, predominantly in the wall plaster of the science library.  The chemical has been linked to various cancers and asbestosis meaning that its removal is strictly controlled by health authorities when it is discovered on building sites.  As a result, and pending further plans to remove the deadly substance without damaging the building, workers are currently banned from entering the site altogether.

James York is the area director for Morgan Sindall and is in charge of the project.  He said that, “The lead into this project has been extremely challenging, and the building has thrown things at us that no one could have ever expected. I’m extremely proud of how the team has tenaciously stuck to the task and worked with the university and the college to create a solution to unlock what will now be a fantastic new facility.

The entire team has worked incredibly hard so far as the project involves a careful balance of improving the building whilst retaining features expected in a Grade II listed building. Once complete, we will hand over an outstanding teaching and social space which will attract students from far and wide.”

The plans for the sight also include a brand-new dining hall development with impressive vaulted ceilings and exposed timber, a library on the top floor, and special facilities to hold items from four different university museums in the basement.

Image Credit: Alloyox via Wikimedia CC BY-SA 4.0

“I am the Chair!”: Emergency Union meeting on fashion show devolves into chaos

CW: Sexual violence, child abuse, suicide attempt, trauma

Following Thursday’s controversial late-night debate, the Union’s split surrounding Saturday night’s fashion show and its governance has spilled further into the open. 

The fashion show was aimed to host and feature ‘survivors’ of trauma.  Senior Members of Committee, including the Librarian Charlie Mackintosh, called an extraordinary meeting of the standing committee on Saturday afternoon, criticising the way that senior leadership had handled the event. 

Throughout the meeting, there was emotional pushback from the organisers of the event, including the models and designers who were meant to feature at the show.

The current Oxford SU President and Oxford Union Secretary Anvee Bhutani pledged a ‘Survivors Fashion Show’ in her manifesto for the Hilary Term Union elections. 

The event was advertised as a “night to celebrate and empower” survivors of abuse and trauma, with proceeds going to charities which support survivors.

The past week, however, saw extensive criticism of the event, including from WomCam [the SU’s women’s campaign]. Members of Junior Committee, who were assigned to work on the event, expressed their concern about the potentially “triggering” nature of the show.  

In an email exchange the day before this meeting, seen by Cherwell, numerous senior members of the Union raised further concerns about the show. A senior member went as far as to say he “strongly believed” that the event should not go ahead, though it would be “logistically and financially difficult” to cancel it at such short notice, adding that it should be postponed “at a minimum” until sufficient consultation had been held. Other senior members supported his assertion in subsequent emails.

A senior Union member told Cherwell that the show was not discussed at a Monday Standing Committee meeting, which they claimed the President did not attend. Minutes from that meeting are not yet available. 

Saturday’s contentious meeting, which lasted two hours, was attended by numerous members of various Union committees, including President Michael-Akolade Ayodeji, ex-President Adam Roble, SU President and Union Secretary Anvee Bhutani, Returning Officer Chris Collins and a host of other senior members, including Charlie Mackintosh, Naman Gupta, Will Feasey, and Kesaia Toganivalu.

The first object on the agenda was a letter sent by former Treasurer Kesaia Toganivalu, one of the co-founders of ‘Not Here, Not Anymore’. The letter called out the Union’s decision to go ahead with the fashion show despite criticism. 

The letter cited NHNA’s criticism of the show, saying that “the Oxford Union Committee actively propagate a belief that those who come forward about sexual assault are doing so for political gain. In last term’s election on a campaigning level sexual violence was solely spoken about as something people would leverage for political gain”.

The Woman’s Officer, Serene Singh, who has taken a leading role in organising the fashion show then spoke, defended the show by describing its roots as an anti-suicide project. She went on to say that societies which had criticised the show misunderstood the event in its promo posters, but that It Happens Here were ultimately “fully in support.”  

Toganivalu then tried to make a point, but was stopped by Ayodeji. He then stopped Mackintosh from interjecting, saying “I’d like to get as many new points as possible”. Toganivalu would later dispute Singh’s claim that IHH had retrospectively endorsed the fashion show, saying that “it is factually not true.”

A spokesperson for It Happens Here confirmed to Cherwell that it decided not to be involved with the fashion show on Sunday 29th May after discussions with Union organisers. 

Ayodeji would frequently stop other speakers from making “points of order” and other such interruptions. Secretary’s Committee member Rosie Jacobs’ speech about the disregard for the feelings of female Junior Committee member was halted twice by Ayodeji, with Treasurer Gupta eventually asking “Why do you keep interrupting her?”. “I’m the Chair of this meeting”, the President responded.

After this, some of the show’s participants  spoke, describing the empowering effects that performing had had on them. In an emotionally charged moment, multiple committee members spoke about survivorship, and what the theme of the show meant to them.

Bhutani claimed that neither any Junior Members nor any Committee complained to her or asked questions in the three-month period between her election and the event going on. She described this lack of communication as “extremely disrespectful and hurtful.” Mackintosh attempted to reply, but was shut down by Ayodeji, who repeated “I am the chair.” 

The meeting broke into chaos shortly after proceedings restarted at 15:20. Mackintosh attempted  to replace Ayodeji with the Senior Welfare Officer as chair of the discussion. After a brief confusion over whether this was in fact constitutionally possible, the members of the Standing Committee present took a vote. 

Hegde, Mackintosh, Naman Gupta, Spencer Shia, and Matthew Dick voted to replace Ayodeji, whereas ex-president Adam Roble, Alex Garcia, Israr Khan, Bhutani, and Joshua Chima voted against. As a result of the draw, Ayodeji remained chair.

Bhutani read a statement from a junior committee member that had been sent to her in support of the fashion show. The Junior Committee member said that the way that It Happens Here had handled the situation was “awful”. If people were upset, she argued, they should have raised concerns earlier.

Anvee Bhutani told Cherwell that she was “ashamed and embarrassed” to be on the same governing body as three other individuals who called the meeting: “By calling this meeting, [they] gave the models a terribly disgraceful welcome and then forced them to recount and relive their trauma, from being abused as a child to having survived a suicide attempt, at the meeting table. Given that this was personally distressful for me, I can’t imagine how much worse this would have been for the models.”

Nearly two hours in, ex-president Adam Roble attempted to end the meeting. Ayodeji said he was “not inclined to let this meeting run much longer”, extending it by five minutes with many members still waiting to speak. Throughout the meeting, he said that he did not want the meeting to go on for too long, citing concerns about whether attendees would be “triggered” by the discussion.

The final intervention of the afternoon was by a female member of the Junior Appointed Committee. She described the meeting’s proceedings as “extremely disrespectful”, criticising the perceived silencing of junior members speaking out during the meeting. She said that senior leadership had “pit [sexual violence survivors] against other survivors”. 

She continued that the meeting had demonstrated that the Union was “not an encouraging environment for female members of [the] Committee to come forward”.

Her speech was met by a round of applause, including by Bhutani and Ayodeji.

A senior member told Cherwell that the chairmanship of the meeting was ‘abysmal’. They added: “A meeting which was called to discuss governance, and ensuring safeguarding and wellbeing in the Union, never touched on those topics.” 

Anvee Bhutani told Cherwell that the concerns raised by those who called the meeting “seemed like performative solidarity”. She added that the models said they “had never felt more safe or loved”.

Though “there were concerns raised about the event happening at the Union given [its] history”, “one of the key organisers of the event and a senior member of the committee was sexually harassed at the Union itself several times and this is their way of reclaiming this space,” Bhutani emphasised.

She concluded: “On the whole, it was evident that those who were against this show previously had a complete misunderstanding of what the show stood for. I honestly found it appalling that governing body members would think this is an appropriate item to table for discussion in this way and I think them trying to demean all those involved in making this event possible is absolutely vile. I seriously hope they take the time to reflect on their actions and the impact it had on everyone today.”

Michael-Akolade Ayodeji and other senior Union figures have been approached for comment. The article will be updated to reflect their responses.

This article was updated at 15:23 to include Anvee Bhutani’s statements.

Sexual Violence Resources

University of Oxford 

Sexual Harassment and Violence Support Service

Oxford against Sexual Violence campaign for students. 

Oxford University Counselling Service – 

[email protected]   01865 270300

Oxfordshire and United Kingdom 

https://www.osarcc.org.uk/

The Samaritans (open 24/7)   [email protected]   116123

Revenge Porn Helpline 

It Happens Here:

Join us at It Happens Here if you need support or want to learn more about what you can do to help the cause.

We run weekly wellbeing sessions for survivors and their allies (Safe Spaces project), which you can sign up for here

 If you have been affected by any of what has been raised in this article, please consult https://www.ithappenshere.co.uk/ where you can find a list of resources, ranging all the way from college level based support to national support services. We also have a short quiz you can take to signpost you to the most useful support service.

Image Credit: Topper the Wombat/ CC BY-SA 4.0 via Wikimedia Commons

The University must take a look at itself before dishing out trashing fines

0

The University has lately been dishing out fines of up to £150 to students caught ‘trashing’. The SU criticised the University’s decision to fine students. The SU said that it opposed the University’s ‘top-down and paternalistic approach’ which “villifies, patronises and scapegoats students”, opposing the “disproportionate punishment” according to students’ different financial situations. The SU added that it is “not students’ responsibility to save the University money in order to run essential student services and facilities”. Right on. 

‘Trashing’ is what it says on the tin- wasting goods, destroying the environment. The authoritative measure might have otherwise been somewhat credible if the University had a clean and green history. 

While climate change is at the top of the University’s agenda in research and development, the University seems to have little qualms about accepting funds from the world’s mega polluters, such as INEOS (2021) and Shell (2013). In relation to INEOS’s donations, a statement from the Oxford Climate Justice Campaign last year said that it was a “clear example of greenwashing”.

Worse, Oxford was caught out by the Panama Papers using offshore tax havens to secretly invest millions of pounds into ventures which develop oil exploitation. This revelation dates from 2017, not long ago. Just imagine what else might be hidden behind unrevealed documents.

The University has made no no statement promising to cut ties to any major earth polluters. The University has not shown any willingness to cooperate with the SU’s Green Trashing Campaign or EcoTrash. It has essentially told students ‘we’re always right, you’re always wrong’. We’ve heard it all before. 

Students have been using lube for trashing, despite the threat of fines. The central issue for the University now is that the locus of trashing is not confined to the corner of Merton Street. Instead, confetti has littered the whole city, making the clean-up job ever more difficult. The University has made things all the more challenging for themselves; it must get its own house in order and still mop up the mess across Oxford.

There’s a blatant conflict of interest for the University to punish its students for trashing while failing to make public assurances about the source of its own donations and investments. You can’t punish students for the crimes you fuel. 

Image Credit: Philip Halling/CC BY-SA 2.0 via Geograph

“Rage and heartbreak” – Review: Medea

TW: graphic descriptions of death.

There is little quite so devastating and unexpected as a mother murdering her own children. The mindset and motivations behind such a deed are inexplicable – but this is precisely what fifth century Greek playwright Euripides explores in his tragedy Medea. The play, first performed at the dramatic festival at Athens in 431 BC, continues to inspire conflicting feelings amongst its audiences almost two and a half millennia later. This week, the New College Classical Drama Society staged their interpretation of this contentious play, transforming the New College cloisters into a fifth century Corinthian palace.

Featuring a considerable contingent of New College students in both the cast and the crew, this year New College’s annual Greek play was directed by Old Member Andrew Whiffin, who graduated in 1973. This is the first time the Greek play has not been directed by David Raeburn, acclaimed classicist and translator, who sadly passed away in 2021. The translation used for this staging of Medea is his – as stated in the programme, this decision was in “tribute to his unique contribution to New College Classics”.

New College’s Medea begins with an intensity that establishes the play’s consistently heightened emotional tone. Emily Osborne as the Nurse imbues every word of her opening monologue with the suitably frantic energy of a woman frightened and distressed by her raving mistress, who is threatening “death to the whole house”, as we soon find out. Indeed, Medea is a play with foreshadowing aplenty: the Tutor (Mortimer Blyth) reinforces the tension, stating that “there’s worse to come”. 

The first we experience of the protagonist (or perhaps antagonist) herself is the sound of her terrible screaming from inside the cloisters. Medea (Emily Hassan) is not yet visible to the audience, but her shouts of “io! io!” resound chillingly through the quad, preparing us for the thunderstorm that is to come. We share in the mounting trepidation of the Chorus of Corinthian women, played by eight cast members, plus a Chorus leader (Paige Allen), who are worried that “sorrow’s tide is powerfully sweeping in”. How right they are.

As Medea, Hassan’s powerful voice has inflections of rage and heartbreak in turn: she laments the sorrow of her situation, then seethes over Jason’s betrayal before plotting ways to wreak hideous vengeance. She is a truly frightening figure as she stalks the quad, coming right up to the audience and looking them in the eye as she delivers some of the most acerbic lines of the play.

Jason (Syren Singh), who has given up Medea for a new wife, is insufferably conceited and chauvinistic. Entering the stage resplendent in blue and gold, Jason gloats over Medea, his irritatingly blasé attitude in marked contrast to her aggravated state. Singh’s voice conveys the rhythmic undulations of Euripides’ metre, echoing the original Greek verse form of the play; Raeburn’s modern but melodic translation allows for this homage to be paid to the way in which the tragedy would have been performed in the fifth century BC. The Choral odes likewise show a keen awareness of the metrical nuances of the original Greek text, a true feat for a performance in English.

Flawless and subtle is Hassan’s portrayal of Medea’s trademark duplicity. After convincing an initially unrelenting Creon, whose nervous firmness is well conveyed by Kilian Meissner, to allow her to stay one more day in Corinth before her departure into eternal exile, Medea glances stealthily at the audience, and the traces of a smirk on her lips betray her true, malicious intent. Our dread on behalf of Creon clogs the evening air. We witness again Medea’s chilling smile when she successfully manipulates Aegeus (Danny Doyle-Vidaurre) into promising her asylum. Doyle-Vidaurre’s cheery portrayal of Aegeus affords a welcome moment of respite from the overall gloom of the play.

A particularly memorable scene is the Messenger’s (Ailbhe Sweeney) recount of the death of Princess Creusa and Creon. Sweeney singlehandedly and brilliantly re-enacts the horror of this scene; she physically recreates Creusa’s movements as the princess, poisoned by Medea’s deadly robe, “staggered sideways, her limbs all shaking”. Her own repulsion at the sight of Creusa’s flesh “oozing away from her bones” makes the audience recoil – it is entirely believable that she has witnessed this terror. All the while, Medea revels in the “hideous agony” Creusa and Creon suffered by her doing, her laughter clashing unnervingly against the Messenger’s stricken tone.

As the June sun sets, plunging the cloisters into soft orange-lilac light, the sun likewise sets on Medea’s relationship with Jason and her children, and we reach the explosive climax of the play. Blood-curdling screams of children from offstage confirm all our worst fears; the audience shudders in the cooling evening air. Jason and Medea’s final altercation takes place over the expanse of the quad, Medea standing in the cloisters and Jason on the grass, with the audience physically caught between them. I had wondered how the team would pull off this final scene, in which Medea traditionally stands in a chariot suspended above the stage, but they made excellent use of the space afforded by the New College cloisters to reflect the irrevocable emotional separation between Jason and Medea.

It is at this point that Jason’s hitherto haughty demeanour finally peels away, and he is left a shaking, stammering wreck as he begs Medea to allow him to hold his sons’ corpses one last time. The role reversal is striking, horrifying and poignant; it is here that we truly sympathise with Jason.

In advance of opening night, the Classical Drama Society had asked followers on social media, “are you #TeamMedea or #TeamJason?” A mark of a truly successful staging of Medea, the audience left New College’s production as torn about this question as ever. 

Image credit: Marius Maxwell.

‘You know that you’re witnessing history’: CNN’s Clarissa Ward at the Union

0

CW: Violence

Kharkiv, 24th February, 4am Kyiv time. No sooner had Vladimir Putin finished an impromptu speech in which he announced the start of a ‘special military operation’ in Ukraine, then the first artillery barrages of the war began. The off-record intelligence Clarissa Ward and her team had received from CNN’s stateside offices was correct: Russia was going to invade Ukraine.

Addressing an audience at the Oxford Union, the CNN Chief International Correspondent said she’d considered the prospect of war “crazy”. In spite of the increasing presence of Russian troops along the Ukrainian border, Ukrainians she’d spoken to did not seem to think – at least publicly – that Russia would invade. Neither did many journalists who had covered the 2008 Russo-Georgian war and 2014 annexation of Crimea. It didn’t make sense. “There was no clear victory for President Putin to achieve. And even at that stage, with a much different understanding of what that would look like and how quickly the Ukrainian forces would capitulate, it still didn’t seem to make any sense,” she said. 

The imminent threat of a war which wasn’t seeming to materialise could have been part of a strategy for Russia to achieve diplomatic objectives. But after Putin gave a speech on 21st February in which he recognised the independence of the Donetsk and Luhansk People’s Republics, two seperatist-held regions in Eastern Ukraine, she realised “there was always going to be a war”. There was no bluff.

“Not only do you know that you’re witnessing history,” she said, recalling the first attack on Kharkiv. “You know that you can’t fully get your arms around everything that’s happening. But you also know that your only job is to be on air and describe what you’re seeing.”

Born in the UK and educated at Yale University, Clarissa Ward started her career as a journalist in the aftermath of the September 11th Attacks. She told the Union that, like many Americans, she felt a sense of a “calling” after the Twin Towers fell, and wondered what her role in responding to that moment could be. She was struck by the misunderstandings and miscommunications which led to the attack, and became fixated on finding out not only who was responsible, but how the world saw America versus how America saw itself. 

Her first overseas job was a three month long internship at the CNN bureau in Moscow. After that, she wanted to get a job in the newsroom. CNN was her first choice, since she started watching it “religiously day and night” after 9/11, but they were unable to immediately offer her a job. Instead, she was hired by Fox News to man the night-shift. “I had no life, I had zero life”, she said, comparing how close she felt to achieving her dream in Moscow to how far away it felt at that point. But the night-shift meant that Ward could talk to journalists in Baghdad when they woke up seven hours ahead of New York. After experiencing the invasion of Iraq vicariously through their dispatches, she convinced Fox News to send her to Baghdad, where she quit her job and established herself as a freelance journalist based in Beirut.

Ward was never interested in pursuing a career covering domestic politics, and even turned down an offer to be on the Presidential campaign trail with Hillary Clinton. Being an international correspondent has allowed her to be a witness to many of the most dramatic events in recent history, including the 2011 earthquake in Japan and conflicts ranging from Iraq and Afghanistan, to Yemen and Syria.  When asked about how much agency she has to choose the stories she pursues, she told Cherwell that while she knows that it’s necessary for her to cover massive stories when they break, she is able to pitch and cover stories she feels passionately about. One under-the-radar story she investigated in 2019 to Emmy-winning success was the Russian government’s deployment of mercenaries known as the ‘Wagner Group’ in the Central African Republic.

Ward also worked with Bellingcat to investigate the poisoning of Russian opposition figurehead Alexey Navalny. She told Cherwell that she had not done any stories with Navalny’s Anti-Corruption Foundation since the 2020 investigation, but has remained in touch with Navalny’s team.

When asked by Union Librarian Charlie Mackintosh about the most challenging environment she had worked in, Ward described how several of her colleagues and friends were captured by both the Assad regime and ISIS when covering the war in Syria, adding “the situation became so dangerous that journalists basically stopped going for very good reasons”. In 2016, she went undercover in rebel-held regions of the country, and was later invited to speak at the UN Security Council about the horrors civilians were living through. “My first day on that trip we saw a fruit market get bombed for no reason. A ten year old boy, two women, and a handful of other people were killed,” she told the Union.

“When you come back from a place like Aleppo, you really struggle to embrace joy and love,” she replied to a question about how she takes care of her mental health after working in combat zones. She described how while she could feel like people at home don’t understand the environment she’s returned from, it’s crucial to reintegrate into everyday life. She also stressed the importance to journalists of finding outlets such as therapy to deal with the traumatic events they witness.

“You’re not always the cleverest person in the room,” she said when asked what advice she had for students at Oxford University at the end of her talk. “And if you are, it doesn’t matter because you can learn so much from listening. I feel like as a culture, we’ve lost track of that. Listen, be curious, and be open.”

Image: The Oxford Union