Wednesday 2nd July 2025
Blog Page 2245

Sri Lankan President visits

0

President Mahinda Rajapaksa of Sri Lanka visited Oxford on 13 May to address the Union.

 

The talk was received by a full Chamber with representatives from the Sri Lankan, Indian, Chinese and Pakistani societies, and was given a standing ovation.

 

The president of Oxford’s Sri Lankan Society, Dilan Fernando of University College, joined the Master of the College in hosting President Rajapaksa for tea prior to his speech.

 

The President was elected in 2005 following a narrow victory for his Sri Lanka Freedom Party.

DVD launched to combat diabetes

0

An instructive DVD has been released in tandem with a new website by the Diabetes Research Network in the hopes of encouraging sufferers of diabetes to participate in clinical trials.

 

1 in 25 people in the UK are diabetic, even though it is not a widely discussed or understood disease.

 

This DVD, which contains multiple images of diabetic patients, is to be distributed in care centres across the UK in order to attract volunteers to aid the treatment of the disease.

Chelsea gunman’s ChCh funeral

0

The funeral of Mark Saunders took place at Christ Church last Friday. Saunders was killed by police after he started shooting at passers-by and his neighbours outside his Chelsea home in London on 8 May.

 

The funeral was led by Reverend Ralph Williamson. A eulogy was read by his widow and fellow Oxford alumnus, Elizabeth Clarke.

 

Saunders studied as an undergraduate at Christ Church and was accepted to the Bar in 1999.

Mummified infant on show

0

The Ashmolean Museum, Oxford, has loaned the mummified body of an 18-month old infant boy. It will be displayed in art exhibition, Unravelled, in London.

 

The mummy was unearthed in Egypt, 40 miles south-west of Cairo, in 1888 and has been in Oxford ever since.

 

The collection by Angela Palmer is full of extraordinary works of art inspired by the distressing nature of the boy’s death.

The exhibition includes a spectacular ink drawing on 111 sheets of glass.

China earthquake appeal launched

0

 

Six Oxford student societies have made a joint effort to raise relief funds for those affected by the earthquake in China on 12 May.

The Committee will send all donations to help purchase necessary teaching equipment for temporary schools. In the next three to six months they hope to have enough money to contribute towards the rebuilding of a school in Sichuan.

The group, called the Oxford University Sichuan Earthquake Fundraising Committe, comprises: the Oxford Chinese Students and Scholars Association, the Chinese Association, the Asia-Pacific Society, the Chinese Drama Society, ‘Oxbridge China’ and the PPE Society.

Guagua Bo, PPE undergraduate and current President of PPE Society, said, “As with any national disaster we feel very strongly for the people in China. Just looking at the earthquake pictures is very touching, in a time when there is so much hatred this disaster is bringing people together and bringing out their warmth.”

In the last week groups of students have taken to the streets of Oxford to collect money for this cause. Bo said, “We have already raised £15,000 just from street collections. It is nice to see that something like this can bring out a lot of emotions from people. One elderly lady walked past and just dropped £100 into the collection box.”

Charlie Guo, Vice-President of the Asia-Pacific Society, agreed, saying, “It is very touching seeing so much support from people; one guy I distinctly remember, he just took all his notes and coins out of his wallet without hesitation and put it into our donation box. I sincerely thank all that have helped and supported our action.”

Bo added, “Our financial support will never match some of donations from big banks, but we do want to do something concrete to express as much of our effort as possible.

 “We want to set this up as a long running cause and since lots of schools have gone down and lots of peoples academic aspirations have been severely affected, we felt that this would be a suitable way for us to help.”

JCR presidential candidate fined

0

A candidate for the Christ Church JCR Presidency has been reprimanded by police while carrying out a ‘traditional’ theft from another college.

On Sunday evening, David James was given an on-the-spot £80 Penalty Notice Order and taken to the police station after successfully stealing a bench from Brasenose College.

He was caught after a Brasenose porter apprehended the Brasenose student who had let James in, and contacted the police.
The incident was reported at 9.25pm, by which time James had been seen “out of breath” back in Christ Church.

A spokesperson for Thames Valley Police said, “Police were called at 9.25pm on Sunday 18 May following reports that a man had stolen a bench from Brasenose College. He was located and issued an £80 Fixed Penalty Notice for Disorder.”

It is claimed that the incentive for the theft was an “old tradition” that to be eligible for the Christ Church JCR Presidency, you need to steal something from another college.

The Dean of Christ Church, The Very Reverend Christopher Lewis, described the event as a “stupid prank.” He said that it was “foolish, but not quite a hanging offence” and added that the event had been dealt with.

A second year at Christ Church, who wished to remain anonymous, commented on the events. He said, “I think the whole event is unfortunate, as it perpetuates the view of Christ Church as a bunch of arrogant tossers in the eyes of the University.”

Rival candidate, Alan Rimmer, also commented. He said, “The current JCR President set both candidates the task of bringing back within half an hour something from another college.

“David’s was a rather impressive effort, though whilst the introduction of Brasenose’s garden furniture into the JCR and David’s subsequent departure to the Police station did much to liven up the meeting, I’m sure he’d agree with me that the contest will be won on more substantial matters.”

Following his return and Penalty Notice, David James then proceeded to participate in hustings, which had been delayed for him, and made jokes about the incident in his speech. However, he refused to comment on the event to us.

Before the elections were held, an anonymous voter at Christ Church said, “The senior tutors are definitely concerned about what happened.

“It raises the question of whether he should be allowed to run or not. I think [this event] may go in the other candidate’s favour as it delayed hustings and generally hasn’t done him [David James] any favours.”

The current JCR President Laura Ellis refused to comment on the issue.

Hustings closed on Thursday at 8pm. Results will be released later today.

Finals ‘gender gap’ leaves dons in the dark

0

For the first time the the ‘finals gap’ between male and female students in English has closed, but dons are little closer to discovering why men overall do better than women in their final degree class.

Dr. Jane Mellanby, retired professor at the Department of Experimental Psychology who co-authored a study in August 2000 that exposed the discrepancy, said that in Trinity 2007, “for the first time, there was no gender gap in this subject. This occurred because the men did less well than usual and not because the women did better.”

The study in 2000 found that the ‘gap’ appeared despite women having a greater ‘work ethic’, but wasn’t present in engineering, economics and management, biochemistry, physiological science and geography.

“At Oxford, overall, men obtain a higher proportion of firsts than women,” Dr. Mellanby continued. “Part of this difference is due to the fact that there are more men reading subjects that award a higher percentage of firsts (e.g. Chemistry).

“We do not have an answer as to why the gap exists in some subjects and not in others. It is frequently proposed that the reason that the gender gap is seen in subjects where presenting an argument is important is that men are more likely to produce a confident, ‘punchy’ style of argument and that this appeals to examiners,” she said.

“There is however no real evidence (from examination scripts) that this is true. One thing we have shown is that there is no difference in the attitude of male and female examiners to the criteria for awarding first class marks.”

The ‘finals gap’ is currently being scrutinised by the University’s Educational Policy and Standards Committee, but they have yet to reach any conclusions.

Sally Mapstone, Chair of the English Faculty says the Faculty has been undertaking research into the issue. “That work is ongoing and not completed, so it’s not possible, or indeed sensible, presently to offer comment as to what might be the reasons for possible underperformance by female candidates,” she said.

When asked, examiners said they could not usually tell the sex of a student from their exam scripts.

Simon Saunders, Fellow of Linacre and Lecturer in Philosophy of Science, said “it is not possible to tell… I haven’t the faintest idea why women do worse than men.”

Diane Purkiss, Fellow of English at Keble, also said that the performance gap was difficult to explain. “There is a known issue with levels of performance for many different groups, and we are working on it.

“My view as an examiner is that it rarely occurs to me to think about the sex of the student, or their name, college, race, or ethnicity.

I think it would be unfortunate if people felt there was a specifically feminine kind of writing – the notion seems very outdated,” she continued.

“All students who want to do well in English need to do a lot of work, and need to argue and take some intellectual risks,” Purkiss concluded.

English finalists have disputed Dr. Mellanby’s view, stating that the criteria for first class marks involved having a more “masculine” writing style.

“What our tutors said was, you basically have to be really cocky, and guys are better at that,” said Rose Wilkinson, a finalist at St Catherine’s. “They have told us, ‘You have to be willing to bullshit’ and girls are perhaps less willing to throw it to the winds than guys are.”

Wilkinson said an ideal first degree candidate will be a hybrid of the so-called ‘masculine’ and ‘feminine’ work styles. “You would have the work ethic for coursework, what girls have, and then have that risk-taking, bullshitting attitude that guys have.

A mixture of both masculine and feminine – where you can be hard-working in coursework but at the same time be imaginative in exams.”

Another St Catherine’s student, Katherine Rundell, added that, “If you’re going to get a first, you have to get that ‘Wow, look at me!’ effect. Examiners are looking for that spark when they’re marking for firsts and you have to be able to bullshit and take more risks to do that.”

English finalist Hannah Knight said there have been special revision lectures organised by the English Faculty, targeted for female English students, on “pretty much how to write in a masculine way.”

Male English finalists have said that girls are more conscientious in their coursework but lack the “risk-taking attitude” that men have.

“It seems girls revise badly; girls tend to look at every single book and laboriously go over their books of notes,” said Daniel Morgan. “But guys, they tend to select key essay questions and revise certain points rather than everything.”

Teddy Hall deny ‘social crisis’ claims

0

Students at Teddy Hall have spoken out against recent reports of a hostile college atmosphere.

They have described claims of a ‘social crisis’ within the college, as reported by the Oxford Student, as ‘out of proportion’ and ‘exaggerated’.

The allegations arose at the termly college committee meeting, when the Dean, Stephen Blamey, and other senior members of the college, initiated a discussion with the JCR executive about the atmosphere in Teddy Hall.

Blamey claimed at the meeting that the college was ‘too divided into sports and music’, and that some members of the student body were uncomfortable with the college atmosphere.

However Blamey was informed that Teddy Hall student Philip Satterthwaite had bridged the gap by being both ex-rugby captain and a member of the Teddy Hall choir.

Two Teddy Hall students, who preferred to remain anonymous, reacted to the situation, saying,’Teddy Hall is a college with a diverse range of people and we feel that the Dean is fuelling the Teddy Hall stereotype.

‘The third years have been most offended as they have been portrayed as being completely against the first years, which is not the case.’

They denied that an official room divide had been imposed in the bar, saying, ‘When it comes to the supposedly ‘divided’ bar, there are indeed two separate rooms, one extremely rowdy and one quieter side.

‘It seems counter-intuitive that the ‘rowdy’ rugby team would be expected to divide into two groups, they are a ‘team’ after all.’

Harold Buchannan, an undergraduate at Teddy Hall said, ‘There are many people in college that feel that the Dean is perpetuating the problem and is pursuing a vendetta against certain members of the JCR.’

JCR President Charlie Southern commented on the alleged social tensions, saying, ‘The dean brought it to a welfare committee meeting at the beginning of term.

‘He had heard reports of people being unhappy with the atmosphere in college, and the questions at hustings being intimidating. He compiled it from talking to various students at Teddy Hall.

‘My position was to hear opinion from the committee, I don’t see that there is a divide in college. There are lots of different groups but I’ve never seen any real tensions at all.’

He added, ‘One side of the bar is much more raucous and the other is for people having a quiet drink. Everyone agreed it was quite a good thing. It wasn’t a massive separation at all.’

‘The Dean asked me to send the minutes to all the JCR, there was quite a lot of surprise as they hadn’t heard anything about this at all.’

Donation drives ‘losing money’

0

Oxford colleges are missing out on millions in potential revenue in their attempts to raise money for cash-starved “annual funds.”

A Cherwell investigation has revealed that most colleges still rely on outdated methods of fund-raising that sometimes incur an overall loss.

Mass telephone campaigns, often staffed by students who take up room in rentable college accommodation during vacations, rarely provoke interest in those contacted.

Some colleges have even outsourced their “telethons” to external consultants. St Anne’s, Keble, St Catherine’s and LMH, have all paid generous sums to conduct campaigns, either to private companies or students.

Other colleges pay significant sums to their own students. Undergraduate students at Wadham College were offered free room and board in return for two weeks of telephone shift work in the Easter vacation.

Cornelia Carson, the college’s Alumni Relations Manager, said: “the campaign was slightly less successful this year, as only a small number of students agreed to undertake the work. However, we’ve found telephoning in general can be very effective.”

Carson continued: “the college is trying a more personal approach to fundraising, attempting to involve alumni in college life through our stewardship programme.

“We’ve found that hiring students to contact these individuals has a far higher success rate: they are able to talk personally about their experiences and fondness for Wadham, unlike a professional caller.”

However, a third-year student at the college, who had been involved with a previous telethon, told Cherwell that he “hardly raised a penny.”

He said, “it was good fun and interesting work, but the alumni didn’t respond to my enthusiasm that well. There’s always that background knowledge that the call has a financial point to it.”

Mail campaigns, which usually take the form of heavy, glossy brochures carrying high postage costs, have been even more unsuccessful.

A 2007 paper-based campaign by Mansfield, who have the smallest endowment of all Oxford colleges, raised £1200 pounds, but cost over £2000 to run.

One Magdalen alumnus, who left the college almost 30 years ago, described his college’s attempts to contact him by post as “fairly uninspiring.”

He said: “I received a letter from the college asking if I’d like to donate, and was told that I could – if I wished – be contacted by a current student who would talk me through the ongoing campaigns.

“I sent them an email in reply, pretty much saying “No, thanks.” I don’t mind being asked, though. I get such a lot of requests nowadays that I don’t feel bad about saying no. I think I’m a bit desensitised to it all.”

The alumnus says that Magdalen had been “in very patchy contact until the mid-1990s”, when letters and termcards began to appear.

“I prefer the invitations to college events, such as the Waynflete music forum in the summer; they don’t feel so pushy. I think the way forward is to get alumni more closely involved with day-to-day stuff.

“I read History, for example, and if the college was to say: ‘We’d like to buy these new books on the French Revolution for the library,’ I might be interested.”

A recent Christ Church graduate disagreed. He said, “trying to tailor the campaign to appeal to individuals doesn’t work for me. It’s so vulgar to pretend to be interested in getting in contact, when all you want is my cash.”

However, the statistics suggest that most alumni prefer the former approach. Mansfield College, which previously “scraped by on the back of large, infrequent bequests,” decided to change their fund-raising tactics for 2008.

Paul McCarthy, the college’s new Development Director, above, described their new approach. He said, “we dispensed with mail campaigns and telethons.

They had been in use for 15 years, since this office was opened, and they weren’t raising anything.

“Our main priority was to boost our endowment by getting regular donations to the annual fund. Donors are still free to specify where their money goes, but this way we discourage massive one-off investments, which leave us with an uncertain future.”

McCarthy continued: “nowadays we go to meet our alumni, instead of them coming to us. We might go down to London, for example, and meet a few of them for coffee, individually.

“We try to make proposals that are tailored to each person – so for example, suggest that an ex-rower might like to contribute towards getting our 1st VIII a new boat.”

“The figures speak for themselves. 80% of people we meet give some kind of donation. And they’ve all been extremely generous.
“Our office has had to change from getting monthly to weekly bank statements, since the monthly income went up from £1800 last April, to £95,000 this time around. And the numbers keep on rising.”

Wadham’s Alumni Relations Manager agreed with McCarthy that a one-on-one approach had great benefits. “Just as alumni can help us, we hope we can do something for them, too, on top of the good feeling they get from helping out their college.

“Putting old friends in touch with one another, for example, has proved very popular with old Wadhamites, whether or not they give.”

However, McCarthy conceded that this method was easier in a small college like Mansfield, where it was easier to keep in personal contact with leavers.

Nick Thorn, Corpus’s Development Director, insisted that “any sensible campaign always combines more than one approach. There’s clearly not enough time to see all our alumni – some have got to be contacted via mail.”

One Mansfield undergraduate, who did not want to be named, argued that other techniques had also been successful, even since the college instituted its new policy.

“We held a gala dinner a few months back,” the student said, “and one of my tutors raised a massive number of pledges from those attending. What you really need is someone persuasive. And a few glasses of wine.”

Most development offices agreed that it was important to build a culture in which donating is seen as the norm.

McCarthy said: “we want to start as early as possible, while recognising that students are unlikely to be in a position to give when they first leave. Last year, for example, leavers all contributed to getting a new bench for the gardens.”

He hopes the prospect of donation will be more natural for these students, once they have begun to earn a wage. “I have to admit, though, the bench was all their idea,’ he said.

“Maybe students are just getting more generous.”

OUSU consider scrapping President

0

OUSU have decided to employ four new part-time officers in an attempt to improve their track record on welfare.

A recent OUSU report states that the new positions are being introduced “in order to compensate for OUSU’s failings on Equal Opportunities issues.”

The four roles will cater for Black and Minority Ethnic Students (Anti-Racism), LGBT students, Mature students and Students with Disabilities.

The Student Advice Service Review Group, the report reveals, embarked upon such a task “following over 8 months of uncertainty regarding the future of the Service.”

Martin McCluskey, OUSU President, claims that there had been “big arguments” regarding welfare, and OUSU needed to “start again from scratch”, in order to have “one final say” on the welfare provision.

The report also mentions “some acrimonious and bitter debates in the previous academic year”, referring to the motion proposed in Trinity Term 2007 by then OUSU Vice President Imran Khan to have a referendum to abolish the position of OUSU Vice President (Women).

This motion failed, but a separate motion to “consider” the role of Vice President (Women) passed.

However, ten Common Rooms requested such a referendum, and one was held in 6th Week of Trinity Term 2007, and was conclusively defeated.

The Council continued to review the situation, but OUSU admits that the final report, the Welfare and Women Working Party Report, “came to no definite conclusions”.

McCluskey claimed that by Hilary 2008 it was time for OUSU to “tidy things up” with regards to welfare, and to ask themselves “is this the best use of resources?”

The Review Group even considered “abolishing the role of President” in the course of their discussions, questioning if resources could be better spent on employing a sabbatical officer with a specific task.

McCluskey denied that this was a serious consideration saying, “it was not realistic”, but rather “a matter of course”.

He did suggest, however, that OUSU would benefit from “more full time members of staff to reduce the workload” of the President, a role which the report admits is “rather ill defined and… a considerable amount of work.”

“Most worryingly”, the report states, “the role of President frequently compensates for the lack of professional support in other areas of OUSU”, giving examples of recruitment, and liaising with legal and financial advisers.

Despite McCluskey’s claim that this report should be the “final say” on OUSU’s Welfare, the report leaves some issues unsolved. The report suggests that the position of President, for example, “should be re-assessed in the future.”

The fate of motion to amend the constitution to incorporate the four new part-time officers, proposed by McCluskey and seconded by Louise Randall (Vice President Welfare& Equal Opportunities), will be decided at the 5th Week Council meeting this Friday.

This report which announced the new positions was entitled “Strengthening Welfare” and was published this month. It was compiled over the course of Hilary Term and the Easter vacation.