Tuesday, May 6, 2025
Blog Page 365

EXCLUSIVE: Oxford Union Hilary 2021 Termcard

0

Psychologist Steven Pinker, Extinction Rebellion co-founder Roger Hallam, actress Elizabeth McGovern, and YouTube workout star Joe Wicks are among the speakers for the Oxford Union’s Hilary 2021 termcard

Steven Pinker is one of the world’s leading experts on language and mind. His popular books include How the Mind Works, The Blank Slate, and The Stuff of Thought. Time named him  one of the “100 Most Influential People in the World Today.”

Roger Hallam is the co-founder of the high profile environmental action movement Extinction Rebellion. The controversial figure has seen criticism for his advocacy of civil disobedience methods and has been arrested and jailed for his role in protests.

Elizabeth McGovern is an American actress and musician who has garnered Emmy and Golden Globe nominations for her role in Downton Abbey and an Academy Award nomination for Ragtime.

Wicks is a prominent fitness coach, TV presenter, and author. During the COVID-19 pandemic, his ‘PE with Joe’ sessions were an instant hit across the nation, drawing in over 70 million viewers during the first lockdown. All the money generated from YouTube ads was donated to NHS Charities Together.

Other speakers currently include historian Ramachandra Guha, women’s rights activist Nimco Ali, Nobel Prize winner Edmund Phelps, South African born interior designer Kelly Hoppen CBE, EU Ambassador to the UN Olof Skoog, Line of Duty actor Adrian Dunbar, President of the European Court of Human Rights Judge Robert Spano, and Director-General of the International Atomic Energy Agency Rafael Grossi. 

The Union will also be holding eight debates, including whether society has outgrown religion and if we should cancel ‘cancel culture’.

James Price, President of the Oxford Union, told Cherwell: “Despite a tumultuous time with changing conditions, we are proud to put on a diverse range of events. I’m particularly excited  about our ‘Smashing silos’ series, a new set of discussions with nobel prize winners, CEOs and thought leaders to discuss a better way to study the most pressing issues of the day. I hope that members can still feel connected to the Union and the reforms that we are undertaking, even though we may be dispersed across the world right now.”

Chengkai Xie, Librarian of the Oxford Union, told Cherwell: We are living in uncertain times. Yet, in the Librarian’s office, I am proud that our committee worked hard to deliver what members rightfully expect. Additionally, I am delighted to introduce online “meet and greet”, where members can ballot to join speakers on a small zoom call to extend the conversation beyond the main webinar event… I am incredibly excited to bring a virtual film screening of 76 Days to our members following a Q&A with the film director, fulfilling my pledge to diversify Union events.”

Kesaia Toganivalu, Treasurer of the Oxford Union, told Cherwell: “This term, members can get involved with speaker meet and greets still taking place, which they can ballot for. Special thanks from me to the Sponsorship officers and Treasurer-elect for their continual hard work over the vacation, securing member discounts at many local businesses across Oxford- for those still in the city. I’m also really pushing for inter-university partnerships, such as through my work with student start-up OXEX (https://bookoxex.com) that I’m hoping to integrate into the Union (fingers crossed). And would encourage any members who feel they could have a positive effect on the Union’s first Environmental Impact Review to get in touch. In addition, I have organised a panel on whistleblowing, with former whistleblowers and industry experts that I’m sure members will find invaluable. Now, more than ever the Union should be somewhere that values honesty.”

Due to the pandemic, the Union is currently preparing for these events to be held online as in Trinity 2020. However, they are monitoring Covid-19 guidelines to adjust events accordingly – in Michaelmas 2020, some events were held in person with reduced capacity and all tickets booked in advance. 

For the first two weeks of term, the Union have set up an ‘open period’ so non-members can attend talks.

DEBATES

This house believes it is none of your business.

This house believes we are all religious.

This house believes the NHS is the envy of the world.

This house has had enough of experts.

This house would cancel ‘cancel culture.’

This house has no confidence in Her Majesty’s Most Loyal Opposition.

This Union would save the Union.

This House is a Roundhead, not a Cavalier.

LIST OF SPEAKERS

1st Week

Senator Harry Reid – Former US Senate Majority Leader

Steven Pinker – Experimental cognitive psychologist

Daren Acemoglu – Economist and author of Why Nations Fail

Amy Chua – Law professor and author of Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother

2nd Week

Hao Wu – Chinese-American film director, producer, and writer

Jon Sopel – Television presenter and correspondent for BBC World News

Judge Robert R Spano – Judge and President of the European Court of Human Rights

Ramachandra Guha – Historian and writer of India after Gandhi

3rd Week

Ambassador Olof Skoog – European Union Ambassador to the United Nations

Nimco Ali OBE – Social activist and co-founder of The Five Foundation

Katherine Parkinson – Award-winning English actress

4th Week

Joseph Nye – Political scientist and former dean of Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government

Dr Anders Tegnell – State epidemiologist of Sweden

Rafael Grossi – Director-General of the International Atomic Energy Agency

Edmund Phelps – Nobel Prize winner in Economic Sciences

Governor Scott Walker – Former Governor of Wisconsin

5th Week

Elizabeth McGovern – Actress in Downton Abbey and past Academy Award nominee

Debra Soh – International sex researcher, neuroscientist, and columnist

6th Week

Kelly Hoppen CBE – South African born, British interior designer

Graham Allison – American political scientist and author of ‘Remaking Foreign Policy: The Organizational Connection’

Martin Tyler – English football commentator

7th Week

Roger Hallam – Environmental activist and co-founder of Extinction Rebellion

The Rt. Hon. Rory Stewart – British politician and former Secretary of State for International Development of the United Kingdom

Joe Wicks MBE – Guinness World Record for ‘most viewers for a fitness workout live stream on YouTube’

8th Week

Matthew Elliot – Founder and former CEO of TaxPayers’ Alliance

The Rt. Hon. Lord Giddens – English sociologist, prolific author, and a Labour life peer

Senator Doug Jones – Former US Senator from Alabama

Adrian Dunbar- Lead actor in BBC One thriller ‘Line of Duty’

Image Credit: Barker Evans.

Oxford professor claims NHS could vaccinate Britain in 5 days

0

The Regius Chair of Medicine at Oxford, Sir John Bell, has commented that the NHS could vaccinate the whole country against COVID-19 in less than a week.  However, the Oxford professor claims NHS bureaucrats are standing in the way, costing the UK many more lives.

“The NHS has the theoretical capacity to immunise everybody in five days if they want to, but I don’t get the sense they are really motivated,” Bell told the Times.

Bell argues the criteria to volunteer as a vaccine helper is currently too stringent and is one of many things limiting the health services’ effectiveness.  

“Did you see the list of things you have to do to volunteer to help the inoculation programme? To impose it on people who are just sticking a needle in an arm is bonkers.”

The professor also called for authorities to start treating the pandemic like a war, and that they should drop everything to contain the virus spread.  He highlighted Israel’s vaccine programme, which at times was vaccinating 2% of its population a day, as a role model for the NHS.

According to Bell, the slow pace at which the NHS is proceedings is a failure of leadership, not of individual nurses and doctors.

“I think the frontline medics certainly see it as an emergency – those guys are working harder than anyone I’ve ever seen. They are eye-wateringly good, but you don’t get the [same] sense from the hierarchy in the NHS, the bureaucrats.”

As of January 16th, 3,559,179 people in the UK have received the first dose of the coronavirus vaccine and 447,261 have received the second dose.

Sir John Bell has been approached for comment.

Image: CDC via unsplash.com

Covered Market remains open despite lockdown

0

Oxford’s iconic Covered Market is remaining open, despite new lockdown restrictions, in order to allow non-essential shopping.

Traders such as Bonners Oxford grocery, Cardew’s coffee and tea shop, the Oxford Sandwich co. and Ben’s Cookies are remaining open for in-person shopping or providing takeaway food. Other retailers have moved to trading online exclusively, or offering click-and-collect.

It is mandatory for shoppers to wear a mask inside the Covered Market. Shoppers will also need to abide by social distancing measures such as queuing systems, which may differ between shops. Seating in the market has also been removed to prevent people from congregating.

Restrictions imposed under the national lockdown in place since January 6th require all “non-essential” shops to close. Shops providing “essential services” include hardware shops, pet shops, laundrettes, banks, and food shops.

Full details on which traders are operating can be found on the Covered Market website.

Image: Jorge Royan/CC BY-SA 3.0 via Wikimedia Commons.

Time Alone

The echo in the chapel chimes

as I take my unlikely seat.

It  greets this new intoxication

with a moment I want to place

and hold 

in a space of reverence;

this inebriety

as sober and calculated,

as bold

as the meaning I give

to the ticking silence.

And in this space of time

you can give any shape to –

you can call it a sea,

concentrate it into a crest,

a moon, a breeze –

I want to wrap myself

beneath the branches of a tree,

– maybe in a vineyard –

and breathe in 

and drink

all the ripples.

Image Credit to the author.

The Potter

Did you ever meet the man, 

Who lived once in this place?

Seen so many winters he, 

That rust grew round his face. 

Glaze and wheel and kiln, 

Each he gave its spot, 

Moulding earthly heaps,

Homes for ferns and apricots.

Much he did not have, 

Giving instead to what he made:

The strength to last a thousand years,

Never to sag or melt or fade.

Pastel clayful creatures,

Yellow, green and blue, 

Greater than what nature formed,

But natural through and through.   

Muscles weary like a watch 

That’s fallen off the pace, 

Implored his hands 

To work as they had,

In the analogue age.

When time was up he gave the place to me,

I wonder what it was that he could see?

Turned to me that day he did,

Mischief breaking through the rust, 

Did you ever meet a man, he said, 

Who thought that he was lost? 

No, I said, I reckon not,

Pity, he said, I should have liked to make him a pot. 

Image Credit to the author.

Emergency accommodation for rough sleepers in Oxford open for 19 consecutive days

0

On Tuesday, 12 January, the Oxford City Council re-activated its severe weather emergency protocol (SWEP), providing emergency beds for people experiencing rough sleeping.

The SWEP is activated every night when the Met Office forecasts temperatures to fall below zero overnight. It could also be activated in other severe weather conditions such as snow. It was open for 19 consecutive nights this winter, from 23 December to the morning of 11 January. This is the longest continuous duration which the SWEP has remained open. The SWEP was then opened once again on 12 January.

The SWEP has been open for extended periods on a few occasions in the past. In March and April 2013, the SWEP was open for 12 consecutive nights. This occurred again in February to March 2018, when the British Isles experienced the Beast from the East cold wave.

On average, 10 people per night have accessed SWEP accommodation so far this winter, according to data released by the Oxford City Council. The number peaked at 17 people on both New Year’s Eve and New Year’s Day.

In view of the ongoing pandemic, rough sleepers in SWEP accommodation are now offered their own room for the night, while in previous years they would sleep in shared spaces. The Oxford City Council has secured 25 rooms across 3 venues, and there are contingency plans in place to provide more rooms if the need arises. This has been achieved through collaborations with St Mungo’s, Aspire, and Homeless Oxfordshire, organisations that assist homeless people in Oxfordshire.

“Cold weather can kill. It is vital that everyone who is on the streets, or who is at risk of rough sleeping, can access self-contained accommodation as soon as possible, with adequate support where it is needed. We will continue to work with Oxford City Council to save lives this winter,” said Matt Rudd, regional manager of St Mungo’s in Oxford, in a news release on the Oxford City Council website.

“It has been a privilege to provide relief, dignity and a safe warm space to people experiencing rough sleeping. We’ve also managed to support one rough sleeper into stable accommodation, and former rough sleepers in our supported accommodation are providing peer support to people accessing the SWEP service to ensure they are accessing substance misuse recovery groups in the evenings,” added Paul Roberts, CEO of Aspire.

Since the start of the pandemic, the Council has housed 303 homeless people. Of these, 134 have been provided more permanent housing, including some who had been sleeping rough on a long-term basis. The Oxfordshire County Council has also recently provided additional funding to help rough sleepers in Oxford access more support for problems with drug and alcohol use. Oxford City will receive £584,000 initially, with additional funding available in subsequent years, to address intensive substance misuse, according to a press release from the Oxfordshire County Council.

Photo: Garry Knight, via Wikimedia Commons.

Thames Valley Police will fine those who “wilfully and blatantly” break lockdown rules

0

In a message released to residents on Friday, 9th January, Thames Valley Police announced that they will enforce UK lockdown restrictions when they encounter people who are “wilfully and blatantly ignoring the laws.”

Chief Superintendent Robert France, Gold Commander for Thames Valley Police’s coronavirus response, urged “anyone thinking of attending or organising [an event] not to do so,” warning that organisers as well as attendees could face fines. 

Thames Valley Police, the largest non-metropolitan police force in England and Wales serving 2 million people across Buckinghamshire, Berkshire and Oxfordshire, warned that event organisers “could be given a substantial £10,000 fine and those attending will face enforcement through a fine,” fixed at £200 for a first offence, doubling at further offences up to £6,400

“Our officers will continue to engage, explain and encourage people to abide by the restrictions,” said Chief Superintendent France. “Where people have genuinely misunderstood the rules, or where there is an element of complexity, a simple reminder of the regulations is often enough for them to comply.” 

However, if necessary, officers will have no qualms moving to the fourth “e” – enforcement. Meanwhile, Metropolitan Police commissioner Dame Cressida Dick said in a statement that lockdown fines were “increasingly likely”. Home Secretary Priti Patel defended police presence in a press conference on Tuesday (12 January), where she confirmed 45,000 fixed fine notices have been handed out across England for lockdown breaches to date. 

There has been a marked rise in assault against police officers since the start of the coronavirus pandemic, with Thames Valley Police reporting 198 cases of officer assault in March and April, an increase of 40 compared to the same period last year. Vice-Chair of the Police Federation of England and Wales Ché Donald said he was “appalled” by the 31% surge in emergency worker assaults across the UK this year, which he described as “totally unacceptable”.

The government’s message remains stay home, protect the NHS and Save Lives. For the full list of what you can and cannot do during lockdown, visit the coronavirus restrictions page on www.gov.uk.

Image: Wikimedia Commons.

BREAKING: University confirms 45 positive cases this week

0

The University has confirmed 45 cases of Covid-19 amongst staff and students from Early Alert Service tests for the 9th-15th January, with a positivity rate of 20.3%. This does not include the results from the Lateral Flow Tests that students have been encouraged to take upon returning to campus. 222 tests were administered by the University service in total this week. 

The University’s Status and Response page notes that “due to the time interval between a test being done and the result becoming available, it is expected that there will be a mismatch between actual results and those confirmed to us on any given day.” Their figures do not include positive tests recorded outside of the University testing service. 

There were 288 new cases in the county of Oxfordshire on Sunday the 17th of January, according to Oxfordshire County Council, and 96 new cases in the city of Oxford. This comes as Oxford City Council urges residents to stay at home

Ansaf Azhar, Oxfordshire County Council’s Director for Public Health, said: “The prevalence of COVID in Oxfordshire is higher than it has ever been. We are in a worse position than at the height of the first wave last spring, and the situation is continuing to deteriorate.”

“We are relying on the people of Oxfordshire as individuals, families and work colleagues to regain control of this virus by doing what is needed. I would plead with every individual in the county to look deep inside themselves and honestly ask if they are abiding by the rules.”

The Crown’s Unspoken Words

0

The release of Series 4 of Netflix’s The Crown in November of this year has provoked conversation about the level of truth in the depiction of the royal family; the history which lies behind the drama. In fact, articles abound online questioning the accuracy of the show and purporting to reveal “The Real History” behind what The Crown shows – as if the category of “History” is stable and immutable, and not a subjective and superfluous concept.

In considering The Crown’s depiction of “history” and its relation to the genre of biopic, I cannot help but remember the similar swathes of article which followed the release of the 2018 film The Favourite, which similarly presents the life of royalty, but this time the 18th century monarch Queen Anne (played by Olivia Colman).  The Favourite’s depiction of Anne led to controversy due to its portrayal of her relationships with her courtiers Abigail Hill (played by Emma Stone) and Sarah Churchill (played by Rachel Weisz).  The film centres around the sexual relationship between Anne and the two women as each tries to win her affections and therefore the power she holds, contending with each other and Anne’s fickle nature.  The Favourite and its cast were nominated for ten Oscars in 2019, including Best Original Screenplay, Best Cinematography, and Best Picture, and Colman won the Oscar for Best Actress for her performance as the Queen.  Evidently, the film was a critical success. Yet, people were not satisfied with the film’s critical merits; they wanted to know the truth behind what was presented.  Was Queen Anne really a lesbian?  Did Hill and Churchill really fight over her?  What is the “real history” behind it all?  

It seems, then, that any depiction of royalty, from any period, is subject to criticism in its blurring of fact and fiction. Unlike The Favourite, however, the main problem (or strength perhaps) of The Crown lies in its setting in recent history.  Series 4 covers a period spanning from 1979 to the early 1990s; depicting events which many viewers will have experienced firsthand.  For example, the 1981 wedding of Charles and Diana is carefully re-enacted, as is the death of Lord Mountbatten in 1979.  But it is not the depiction of these well-documented events which is causing the controversy; it’s what lies behind these famous weddings and funerals, the undocumented words of the royals, which the writers have had to guess at, and then dramatise, that seems to have caused a problem.  Did Queen Elizabeth really go about seeking out which child was her favourite (as in episode 4)?  Did Michael Fagan (who broke into Buckingham palace in 1982) really give an impassioned speech about the effect that Margaret Thatcher’s policies were having on the working class?  

The question I want to ask though, is do those details really matter?

I think, when it comes to any biopic, “real history” has to be deprioritised.  If an accurate and chronological rendering of history is what you’re looking for, watch a documentary! The Crown may play fast and loose with history here and there; for example, Fagan was reportedly annoyed at the depiction of himself in episode 5 of the show, saying that the actor playing him, Tom Brooke, was “too ugly”, and that a lot of what was depicted during his break-in was pure fiction.  But the dramatisation of this event adds to the overall theme of episode 5.  Whilst not entirely faithful to reality, Fagan’s character acts to highlight the dichotomy between the royals and the general populous during the 1980s; something which Brooke handles well, despite his “ugliness”.

The historical events depicted act more as metaphors for the interactions between the royal family that we’ll never be privy to.  The fights between Charles (played by Josh O’Connor) and Diana (played by Emma Corrin) may not have happened as depicted, but the actors do a brilliant job of bringing out the instability in the relationship, and how unalike and unsuited Charles and Diana were, showing both of their flaws (Charles’ long-standing affair with Camilla Parker-Bowles, and Diana’s lack of understanding of Charles’ aversion to publicity stunts). Neither vilified nor sanctified, Charles and Diana are represented solely as humans with problems of their own.  Despite criticism that The Crown depicts Prince Charles as cold and uncaring towards Diana, the writers also can be sympathetic, leaving out the ‘Tampongate’ scandal between Charles and Camilla.  The writers do an excellent job of taking into account both sides of the story, with three previous series of exposition and context as to why certain characters act like they do.

What The Crown succeeds so well in, then, is taking a subject matter which is as simultaneously secretive and publicised as the royal family, and presenting them as what they are: a family with problems, arguments, affairs, divorces, laughter, jealousy (the list goes on) just like our own family.  And if it makes for good television, does it really matter that there’s a bit of exaggeration?

Artwork by Emma Hewlett

In Conversation with Hannah Witton

0

Hannah Witton’s Zoom background puts the rest of us to shame. She is sat in an armchair with a tidy but colourful bookcase to her right and a bright white wall to her left. Professional yet relaxed, the room is crying out to be turned into a thumbnail. As soon as the call connects, I cannot help but sit up straight, rearrange my hair, and shift the angle of my camera slightly, so as to obscure as much as possible of my own background: my childhood bedroom strewn with the remnants of a recent ten-day isolation.

Youtuber, author, podcast presenter and sex educator, Hannah Witton has dedicated her career to campaigning for and providing holistic sex education in the UK. “Whilst [sex education] is covering important things, it’s just not giving people the full picture of sexuality and sexual relationships,” Hannah tells me. “It is very much in the preventative realm surrounding contraception, pregnancy and STIs and it never really goes into the fact that sex is meant to be pleasurable”. According to the 2019 Relationships and Sexual Education Survey, only 31% of students feel they have been taught all they need to know about sexual pleasure. The figure for contraception, on the other hand, is 86%. Instead of focussing on “all the things that could go wrong”, Hannah advocates for education that covers “the ways to make your social, personal and romantic relationships healthy, fun and pleasurable in the widest sense of the term”. 

But before she can even begin to broach the subject of pleasure, Hannah is stuck “having conversations about the fact that sex, or any kind of penetration, should not be painful”. “We were all lied to,” she says, for the first time raising her voice. “I remember thinking that there was no way around it, that if you had a vulva, the first time you have penetrative sex, it will hurt […] what a messed up thing to be taught”. Painful sex, society would have women believe, is “the price we’ve got to pay for having a vulva […] it’s our eternal punishment”.

Sex education fails on another front too, in its “narrow and rigid view of sexuality and sexual behaviour”. Whilst our normative approach to sex education impacts many intersectional groups, Hannah’s central focus is on the ways in which the disabled community are let down. “Disabled people often aren’t seen as sexual beings, as having any kind of sexual desires, needs or wants, but are also not being seen as viable, desirable sexual partners. So many people would just automatically write off somebody if they saw that they had a visible disability, but it’s because there’s such a lack of education around it”.

At the moment, she says, we are asking all the wrong questions: “How many times do you have sex? How often do you have sex? What kind of sex are you having?”. The hierarchy of sexual acts allows society to define what it considers to be ‘real’ sex, a definition that can often exclude people who have physical disabilities. “If we put pleasure first rather than metrics […] we’ll all have more sex”. For Hannah, the question we should really be asking is “what feels good?”.

Hannah admits that this was an intersection that she had never considered before it impacted her directly, which she regretfully calls a “symptom of a society that often ignores disabled people”. In 2018, after a bad flare of ulcerative colitis, Hannah had an ileostomy, which means that she now has a stoma, an opening in the abdomen that allows digestive waste to be diverted out of the body. “There was a lot to overcome in terms of feeling like my body was mine again. Feeling like I had control and agency, feeling like it was connected to me and feeling like it wasn’t this thing that was trying to kill me – because my body definitely tried to kill me”. 

“When you are suddenly in a different situation where you can’t do the same things that you used to be able to do, you start thinking more creatively. You start to think outside of the box, you can’t follow this script that we’ve all been given. What else can you do instead? […] There may be limitations, there may be restrictions, but there can still be pleasure. One of the things that it’s opened up in my world is crotchless underwear […] it’s something sexy that keeps the stoma bag out of the way”. 

I ask Hannah how she thinks COVID-19 restrictions have impacted the ways that people are having sex. “It’s hard for people. But there are ways to still feel that kind of connection. And there are also ways to be sexy with people remotely […] it’s about deciding if that’s what you want to do, exploring it by yourself and with other people and seeing how it feels”. “Whilst I don’t like to put romantic and sexual relationships on a pedestal, they do serve their own purpose. We can’t deny that. […] Flirting is so fun and energetic, and there’s that exciting feeling of meeting a new person and seeing if there’s any chemistry. […] It’s a shame that people are not being able to experience that”.

But Hannah is hopeful that there will be a silver lining. “We now have this shared language in our society, this collective understanding around public health – and sexual health is also a public health issue […] in theory, in an ideal world, we don’t treat disclosing our STI status any differently than we would to disclosing our COVID status”.

The label ‘sex-positive’ would seem to apply to Hannah pretty unproblematically. But when I ask, she is hesitant to accept the term outright. “The problem is, if you go so hard and so enthusiastic down that route, you forget that a lot of people have negative or even traumatic experiences when it comes to sex. And then it can also alienate asexual people as well”. For Hannah, the term ‘sex critical’ is more representative of her beliefs, incorporating both the good and the bad when it comes to sexual experiences. 

Taking the porn industry as an example, Hannah tells me that whilst someone who is sex-positive might view porn as a healthy way to discover sexual preferences and a liberatory avenue of female sexual expression, someone who is sex critical would scrutinise the industry itself, its exploitation of sex workers and its unsafe labour practices. “We need to be listening to all sex workers. There are lots of different reasons why people will go into sex work”. She leans in and lowers her voice; “there’s lots of different reasons why people go into any kind of work. We really need to be treating sex work in the same way that we would treat any work”.

At the time of our conversation, Pornhub has just announced its decision to remove all unverified content from its platform in order to combat the scourge of child abuse videos that had been found on the site. “We’ll see how that works”, Hannah tells me, “but there is just this general pattern of ‘save the children’ – which is absolutely a noble cause – but the way that governments and businesses try and go about it tends to actually not save the children; […] it trickles down and then consenting adults, sex workers and sex educators as well are being penalized. […] I’m all for holding Pornhub accountable for its shit”. 

“There’s really no good places online for sex workers to make a living safely without the risk of platforms deciding that they don’t want to be associated with them anymore. We saw Tumblr do it. We saw OnlyFans this year. I don’t know if that’s what’s happening with PornHub right now. I imagine it might be a side effect. [Sex workers] are already at the bottom of the barrel of society. It doesn’t matter if we squish them more. That’s what it feels like”.

We say our goodbyes and hang up the call. Thinking back now, I can’t quite believe how comfortable I had been to talk so freely about sex with a stranger on the internet. But Hannah’s attitude was infectious. I had been given a glimpse of what conversations about sex should look like; never condescending, never exclusionary, always honest. Whilst sex education in the UK continues to be embarrassed by its own existence, it is down to people like Hannah to remind us that sex is something worth talking about.

Image credit: Rebecca Need-Menear