Saturday 11th April 2026
Blog Page 632

An Oxford Supermarket Guide

0

Disclaimer: The overall rating is to be viewed through a student lense. Whilst other con- tributing factors such as quality and distance are important, budget friendly options will do better.

Aldi, Botley Road

Opening time: 8-10am Price: £
Range of products: 7/10 Product quality: 7.5/10 Location: 3/10

Overall rating: 9/10

Grocery shopping on a student budget andfinding the central supermarkets a bit toocostly to support your love of avocado andsalmon? Look no further. With savings like 60p on a punnet of grapes, or around £1.50 for smoked salmon (relative to the prices intesco or Sainsbury’s), you can treat yourself to some nutritious goods and not burst thebank.

One thing to take note is that aldi is great for fresh fruit and veg, but more specialist products are on a supplier demand basis, so don’t expect very niche products.

Having said that, they are constantly introducing new ranges, with a personal favourite being the ‘Halo’ brand ice cream equivalent, costing just £1.99; a savingof just over £3! It is significantly furtheraway from central Oxford than any of the other supermarkets, but if you’re fancying a break a walk or cycle to aldi could bejust the thing (especially since you would get the reward of a labyrinth of affordable treats!)

I will say that aldi is not theplace to find overly healthyready meals or meal-deals,but if you are cooking fromscratch/ sticking to mostlyfresh produce then the prod- uct quality is just as good as anywhere else.

Tesco, Magdalen St.

Opening time: 7am-12am Price: ££
Range of products: 9/10 Product quality: 9/10 Location: 10/10

Overall rating: 8/10

With a central location and a meal-dealvariety to die for (or perhaps just spendfor), Tesco is a fantastic supermarket op-tion. Whilst your weekly shop here will be significantly more expensive than in aldi, you get a guaranteed range of products: be it health orientated brands, exotic world foods or brand new product ranges. (Apersonal victory for me was discovering the Polish fridge where I finally discovered acurd cheese which I had been craving from my Polish shop at home!)

Tesco does also have a reduced sec- tion, which at around midday can offer an impressive variety of otherwise pretty expensive goods. Products to expect in this section include: fresh herbs, bags of salad,fresh fish and entire chicken carcusses…

Tesco also offer a clubcard deal which isdefinitely worth taking advantage of if it is your go-to supermarket. Whilst the savings aren’t great, they do add up so you might as

well. The shopping aisles are also very clear to navigate, and unfortunately the samecannot always be said for Aldi.

Life hack: The clubcard scheme comes intoits own if you are spending a lot of money on food or products for college events; this money will be reimbursed by college and you

get all the benefits from the clubcard points! (Best start helping out at JCR events!)

Waitrose, Botley Road

Price: £££
Location: 3/10
Range of products: 10/10 Environmentally conscious: 10/10
Product quality: 10/10 Overall rating: 8/10

What Waitrose lacks in affordability, it certainly makes up in variety and quality! Itis not uncommon to find at least 2 varietiesof any one vegetable, with the bougie purple sweet potatoes featuring among the classic root vegetables. The quality of the food does account for the difference in price.

If you do manage to get the funds togetherfor a Waitrose shop, it may well feel likehaving formal dinner every night.

But jokes aside, if you are a good cookthen you will certainly be satisfied with therange and quality of the various products and spices. The ready meals are also much more extravagant, and there are far more vegetarian and vegan options available.

What’s more, if cutting down waste is high on your list of consumer concerns, Waitrosemay well be the supermarket for you.

Waitrose has recently launched an ‘un-packed’ scheme which is currently being tested in Oxford, with customers using their own containers to buy produce such aspasta, wine and frozen fruit. More than 200 products were taken out of their packaging at the Botley Road shop in June to cut waste.

Voluntouring is not a vacation

0

What springs to mind when you hear ‘volunteering abroad’? For many, it is Western teenagers taking selfies with smiling children in ‘Africa’, enjoying the fact that they’re having an ‘authentic’ cultural experience and improving the lives of the less fortunate. 

My first experience of this was in Ecuador. I was sixteen, and had signed up to a month-long World Challenge expedition, which mixed tourism with volunteering in a local community. I’d had to fundraise to pay the (significant) costs involved – two years’ worth of bake sales, tea and coffee events, and any odd jobs I could get my hands on.

The week-long volunteering project took place in a remote cloud forest community, where I and the other students helped to build sustainable toilets and taught English at the local school. During the course of this week, I distinctly remember thinking how unqualified and unprepared we all were – out of 13 students, only one could speak Spanish at even a basic level, and none of us had the faintest idea how to build a compost toilet. Most of the time we spent ‘volunteering’ was spent waiting around for the local people to (try to) communicate  what they wanted us to do, which translated into basic jobs – moving wood and digging out trenches. Not exactly something that required us to fly halfway around the world to facilitate – let alone each raise and spend nearly four grand to be there.

I didn’t know it at the time, but my expedition was a prime example of ‘voluntourism’ – a form of travel that couples volunteering with travelling abroad to an exotic country. Many choices lie open to the volunteer – be it helping out at an orphanage in Malawi, teaching English in Cambodia and thousands of other opportunities around the globe. Every year, over 1.6m people travel abroad to volunteer, and it is very popular with under-25s, especially from high-income backgrounds.

With such a large demand, a wide range of organisations have sprung up, offering a variety of opportunities around the globe – with one thing in common; questionably high fees. Over 85 organisations in the UK exist (the majority being for-profit) with the average cost of their volunteering programs reaching over £1k – often not including flights, vaccinations or travel insurance. No wonder it’s considered one of the fastest growing sectors of the travel industry, worth an estimated £2bn per year.

However, voluntourism is currently mired in controversy. Some argue the presumption that young unskilled Westerners will be an asset in a development project disturbingly echoes the colonial attitude of the ‘white saviour’. It has reached a point where some communities in the developing world have begun to refuse or ban international volunteers, and closer to home JK Rowling has warned against volunteers, arguing that they perpetuate abusive practices in orphanages. In theory, the concept of voluntourism should be effective – volunteers are providing financial and physical support to development projects overseas. So what is going wrong?

The focus of voluntourism is often on the volunteers’ experience, in favour of the actual development project. This is down to the fact that these ‘voluntourists’ are paying for the opportunity to be there – so they treated more like customers. This has an impact on the range of projects available, as research has shown volunteering with ‘orphans’ has become so popular amongst voluntourists that orphanages are beginning to operate more like businesses than charities, depicting children in poor conditions to attract volunteers. Data from ReThinking Orphanages – a campaign against orphanage voluntourism – has estimated that 8m children worldwide live in orphanages, but up to 90% of these children still have a living parent. Children are being intentionally separated in order to meet the high demand from Western volunteers in search of an ‘authentic experience’. 

International campaigns supported by NGOs and ethical tourism experts have had some success in reducing this particular strand of voluntourism, leading to governments such as Australia banning it. However, they have had little success in pushing for further regulation of the sector, with few blanket requirements or universal standards applying to the industry (while many apply to domestic volunteering). This can have extreme consequences, as volunteers often lack the skill set required for the projects they embark on. Students fresh out of college are unlikely to know how to lay bricks, dig wells or teach English to a class of 30 students in an unfamiliar language – yet provided they have a few grand spare, they’re welcome to travel abroad to do just that. We wouldn’t let volunteers work on a domestic project that they are under-qualified for – yet there is a double standard for volunteering abroad. 

Some would argue that despite their lack of skills, volunteers are beneficial regardless as they are there for free. If volunteers did not crowd out local labour this would be the case, but sadly this is rarely true. Organisations are unlikely to employ local workers when they have volunteers who will pay for the privilege (regardless of their difference in skill). Many studies and anecdotal reports highlight that projects take longer and cost more if they are staffed by unskilled volunteers – especially as they may require supervision. This can even result in volunteer labour impeding a project’s success, as Pippa Biddle recounts of her experience in Tanzania – “turns out that we were so bad at the most basic construction work that each night the men had to take down the structurally unsound bricks we had laid and rebuild the structure”. The money that voluntourists bring is often prioritised over their actual capabilities, with potentially disastrous results. 

By and large, voluntourism can come from good intentions, with the aim of supporting those less fortunate. The reality is that there is poverty and suffering everywhere, not just in the developing world. Many voluntourists cite ‘making a difference’ or ‘giving back’ as part of their motivation, but with a recent UN report claiming that the UK is lagging behind the developing world on child poverty and inequality stats, why is there not a similar enthusiasm for domestic volunteering? Partly this is down to stronger regulation of the domestic sector, but there’s something more at play. Some NGOs have referred to these voluntourists as ‘slum tourists’, pulled towards a mirage of glamour associated with seeing poverty first hand in the developing world – having ‘an authentic experience’, as the stereotype goes – not to mention the bragging rights earned from social media posts documenting their ‘altruistic’ endeavours. 

If volunteers really wanted to make a difference, their money could be more effective if donated to charity, right? Organisations could use it to hire local labour to complete the same projects, and this would be more cost-effective and better for the local economy. However, in some cases even global charities fall short. For example, the Red Cross were criticised for their work in Haiti after the earthquake in 2010, spending $500m they raised in donation ineffectively, with little reaching those it was intended for. If international charities can get it wrong, where does that put voluntourists? With volunteering abroad potentially doing more damage than harm, this can leave those who genuinely want to make a difference exasperated and defeated, left with many questions which are hard to answer, even for those who have made the study of development their career. So how can people best make a difference?

In fact, the most effective way is the one which seems most counter-intuitive – to be a tourist. Tourism makes up a significant proportion of the economies of many developing countries, for example in Cambodia, where it comprises 15% of total GDP. By travelling to these countries and spending money in a way that supports the local economy – for example ecotourism initiatives that protect the environment and provide local jobs – tourists can make a difference whilst experiencing a new culture and environment, just as voluntourism purports to do.

At its best, volntourism is less effective and more costly than providing communities with the support they need, while at worst it’s exploitative and perpetuates colonial-era attitudes. It’s difficult to judge where programs lie on this scale, as voluntourism operators often market their placements to sound as critical and sustainable as possible. Regulation from governments is practically non-existent and would prove difficult to implement due to the varied nature of the sector, so in the end it’s down to us as customers to do the research to ensure that our money is used effectively – whether that’s through volunteering abroad, donating to charity or supporting local economies whilst travelling.

Hopefully it won’t take you as far as an Ecuadorian rainforest to realise that volunteering abroad is not as charitable as it may seem.

Chilean Protests: a call for change

0

It’s Monday morning in the coastal city of Antofagasta, northern Chile. From its centre, the stench of last night’s tear gas has replaced the usually fresh smell from the nearby sea. Children wear masks to avoid painful stinging to the eyes, nose, and mouth. Soldiers stand outside supermarkets, where queues stretch for two or three blocks. It’s like a grotesque caricature of a usual day time scene.

As a student and teaching assistant in Chile, I have seen protests engulf all of Chile over the last few days. Friends, colleagues and neighbours have become frustrated at poor living conditions, corruption and police brutality. What began as a protest against increased Metro prices has rapidly escalated out of the control of the conservative President Sebastian Piñera. These protests may be happening on the other side of the world, but they deserve our support. What is happening in Chile matters. It tests our fundamental principles: are we on the side of peace, tolerance and democracy, or will we allow would-be tyrants to rule down the barrel of a gun?

All ages – children, parents, miners, professors, and the elderly- can be seen congregating outside for a cacerolazo: a form of protest where wooden spoons are clattered against household pans. It’s an act of defiance against the 8:00 pm curfew. They walk towards the nearby Main Street. Army trucks sit waiting to enforce the toque de queda. They bang the pans as the soldiers drive past with guns.

This typical image of the protests is notably missing from Stephen Gibbs’ report in Monday’s Times. He only wrote of rioters’ supposedly responsible for deaths. Photos from the BBC primarily show rioters in provocations with the police. As the few violent protesters receive the majority of the attention, it’s the plight of the peaceful participants that is continually overlooked.

Of course, any movement with such a national reach risks being undermined by the actions of a small minority. Social media in the past few days has been full of posts urging fellow protesters to be respectful and avoid violence at all costs. Students in particular are desperately trying to self-police this diverse movement. This is made particularly difficult by the spontaneous and leaderless nature of the demonstrations.

While the reports rightly condemn violent demonstrations, they ignore its link to police brutality and a President who has declared a State of War on his own people. The demonstrators that I have spoken to in Antofagasta stress the need for peace. Kenneth Shields is a professor of Law with a PhD in Political Science. He was at the protests that afternoon and described a friendly atmosphere where the elderly, students and children were protesting together until the arrival of the special forces. This account of events was supported by various videos shared on social media. It’s a damning indictment of the traditional media’s ability to distort a story in its own interests.

This disparity between the experience of protesters and its portrayal on Chilean news has been a constant frustration for demonstrators. As of writing, there have been 18 deaths, with a further 8 instances of alleged sexual violence carried out by the carabineros. Lists of missing persons and photos of injuries are ignored by the press but feature far more heavily on social media. Javier Ignacio Iara Gallardo, 23, is studying to become an English teacher. He is “zapping between channels, looking for videos, testimonials and photos to compare”. According to him, national reporters’ silence on police brutality forms part of a long-held position of covering up illegal police activity. This lack of faith in mainstream news outlets has forced people to turn to social media to post videos of police using water cannons, tear gas and bullets against demonstrators. In the process, students are determined to show that they are protesting peacefully and are often willing to place their lives at risk to be heard. Their efforts at standing up for truth and justice in the face of a hostile and violent establishment is an inspiring one.

For many, police brutality, mistrust of mainstream news outlets, and a government facing corruption scandals are echoes of a previous era. This is unsurprising: the Constitution has not changed since the Pinochet years, and the top-rank police and military began their training under his dictatorship. Pinochet may be gone, but the Chile of today lives every day in his shadow. Its public life and population are scarred by the legacy of his rule and the traumatic affect it has had on this nation’s psyche.

Danis Andrea Olivares Rojas was 19 at the time of the coup d’etat in Chile in 1973. Now she is 64 and fighting for the future of the next generation. She suspects that the excessive force used by the government is a ruse in order to stage another coup and justify further repression. During our encounter, she launches into an impassioned appeal to the President and the press, pleading for Piñera to take the military off the streets and for the media to report what is truly going on. She says that she isn’t scared, and the curfew won’t make her back down. The noise of the cacerolazo carries on long into the hot Antofagastan night.

Their anger stems not simply a hike in Santiago metro fares but from issues that have been building for 30 years. One mother who working in public health was protesting with her young son. She told me of people dying while waiting for hospital appointments. She described a corrupt pension system that leaves the terminally ill in a situation of crisis, and an education system collapsing under the burden of insufficient student care. Meanwhile, the salary of politicians remains 33 times higher than the US $414 per month minimum wage. No wonder the Chilean people are angry. In the UK we might complain about politcians’ incompetence and expenses, but over here doing so is a genuine matter of life and death. This might seem alien, but to the people I meet every day here in Chile, it’s all too real. These are my friends and neighbours, and they have every right to be bloody angry.

Above all, they believe that President Sebastian Piñera epitomises these problems. He claims to have listened yet offers little reform. He asks for stability whilst stirring divisions. He calls for peace by declaring war. It would be funny if it wasn’t so tragic. Whether you agree with their assessment or not, their concerns should not be drownedout by the violence of a select few. The media should assess the various issues raised by the Chilean people instead of incorrectly labelling them a violent mob.

From the UK it is easy to feel that none of this is very important. However, accurate reporting on this subject matters. Students in the UK deserve the chance to show solidarity with their counterparts protesting in Chile. More generally, the eyes of the world should be on a country where fundamental human rights are being broken and democracy is under real threat. Most importantly, however, the UK needs to support its own Chilean community, many of whom were protesting outside of the Chilean Embassy in London on Monday, as they think of their loved ones back home.

This house believes genetic engineering is irresponsible

0

Proposition: We should not exercise the power to shape our genome

William Atkinson

Who chooses who lives or dies? Which children are born into poverty and hunger? Previous generations would have said God. As staunch an agnostic Anglican as I am, I’m rather glad we’ve done away with that notion now. The last few decades have seen incredible advances in tackling the evils of global poverty and malnutrition. Every day, more people live happier, healthier and wealthier lives than ever before.

But there’s much more to be done, and genetic engineering forms part of the answer. The ‘golden rice’ of Professor Ingo Potrykus was in the news this week. It’s rice that’s high in Vitamin A. Deficiency in this is almost unknown in the West. Elsewhere it’s a huge killer. It’s estimated as the cause of 2,000 deaths a day, more than HIV or malaria. A third of global children suffer from it, and it can lead to blindness. But the introduction of this rice has been delayed in many countries because of stifling regulations. This resistance to genetic engineering is a disgraceful tragedy. The millions that died unnecessary deaths attest to that.

So why, if I can so passionately defend genetic engineering, should I argue it’s irresponsible?

Because plants are different from people, as much as Guardians of the Galaxy suggested otherwise. As genetic engineering progresses, it’s moving into troubling areas. ‘Designer babies’ is an infantile term. It makes you think of Sex in the City style choosy mums picking out their best babies. Oooh, I fancy a ginger one I think. Maybe a girl. Let’s not make her too bright though, the last one was a bit too clever, etc. It’s like Aldous Huxley crossed with Sophie Kinsella. But don’t let this silly image hide a deeply problematic debate. What right do we have to choose what our kids are like?

It happens already, for a lucky few. The wealthy can have sperm sifted from donors predisposed to particular traits. But hoping for a particular sex or hair colour is nothing compared to some of the implication of genetic engineering. What happens thirty or so years down the line when a parent can choose not only their child’s IQ or predisposition for putting on weight, but whether they suffer from mental illness or a disability? If parents chose in a certain way, they’d be suggesting those born naturally with those conditions were somehow less worthy of life. That’s horrifying.

It’s an old debate; after all, the term eugenics was invented in 1883. That doesn’t make it any less crucial. I stand foursquare behind Professor Potrykus and those like him whose work can do so much to alleviate human suffering. But as genetic engineering spreads from plants to humans, I can’t help but feel we’ll be resembling Potrykus less and less. Instead, we’re like those nations blocking the introduction of his rice, choosing who gets to live or die.

Opposition: If done carefully, gene editing can solve problems nothing else can

Yaelle Goldschlag

Gene editing brings to mind dystopian scenarios. The technology and potential behind gene editing feel so futuristic that we condemn progress. But we must not dismiss the field because of its potential dangers. We must instead proceed cautiously and carefully.

Gene editing research today deals primarily with improving unfavourable situations, from increasing crop resilience to preventing diseases. Examples of past experiments include treating a man with HIV by transplanting modified, HIV-resistant cells into his bloodstream and increasing algae’s biofuel production.

Various concerns arise from different categories of gene editing. We must conduct effective tests when modifying food crops because the food is often widely distributed. Edited genes that are inserted into live organisms should be tested like any other medical treatment. However, creating regulations that enforce effective testing and thoughtful progress is preferable to outlawing advances. Progress can be undesirable: we should likely not allocate money towards building larger nuclear weapons.

But we should continue with research in areas that may be fruitful. With the climate, the potential for food shortages, and the state of medical advances, gene editing has the potential to be useful.

There are consequences to tampering with the human genome however. Successes in eliminating a disease or creating immunity may come at the expense of other consequences. The longer-term consequences are speculative. Editing the germline may spur evolution that has been remarkably absent from humans for thousands of years. It is hard to know what will happen if we upset that distinction.

Other concerns are dystopian: what would happen if we improve some segment of humanity? Will this new technology lead to elimination of diseases, increases in strength or intellectual ability, or even reductions in ability to enforce a class-based system?

But these are not decisions we must make today. There is no indication that society will advocate for these changes: people are rightfully wary of editing the human genome, and governmental legislation and self-imposed regulations in the research community prohibit this area of advancement. I argue in favour of thoughtful gene editing, but against nonessential changes to the human genome. There are cases where modifying the human genome may be desirable such as when a fetus is known to have a serious disease. As in these other areas, we should continue to have transparent discussions and reevaluate as new scenarios arise.

Review: Another Sky

0

Being punched in the face then kissed tenderly”: this is how Another Sky described their music, and after seeing them live I’m inclined to agree.

Wearing a t-shirt with the print of Joy Division’s iconic debut album ‘Unknown Pleasures’, lead singer Catrin set the tone for an ethereal and energised performance. As so many reviewers have said, her voice is – particularly live – astonishingly beautiful, reminiscent of Florence Welch. It has an incredible pitch range, rising from deep, sonorous tones to a high-pitched celestial wail in their opening song ‘Apple Tree’. Taken from their recent EP ‘Life Was Coming In Through The Blinds’, released in June this year, the song began a vibrant set that brought a warming charm to the room at the top of Cowley Road’s O2 Academy.

Announcing their second song as concerning a “past life as a fish”, the set continued in its bizarre but captivating mix of serene, lulling melodies and furiously energetic drum build-ups. Drummer Max Doohan’s movements from tambourine to cymbals solos created an unusual timbre that characterises the band’s eclectic harmonies, welding perfectly with singer Catrin’s transitions between electric guitar and keyboard. Her voice matched wonderfully with bassist Naomi Le Dune’s warm tones and extremely cool aura.

Quipping to the audience in between songs, Catrin announced that one was about places far away – such as Canary Wharf – and another was for “the ladies in the room”. Tantalising. Her on-stage relationship with guitarist Jack Gilbert was lively and dynamic, emanating enthusiasm as Gilbert became visibly engrossed in the set. Their performance of ‘The Cracks’, also from their recent EP, was a highlight as my favourite song of theirs. Chaotic acceleration to an indulgent fever pitch faded carefully and expertly to silence, holding the audience’s attention.

It’s a shame the set was only 30 minutes, as the audience and I were almost bewitched by its end. I’ll definitely be seeing them again.

Interview: The Sherlocks

0

On 4th October, Yorkshire indie band The Sherlocksreleased their second album, Under Your Sky, opening at a brilliant Number 13 on the Official Album Charts. Simone Fraser sat down with their lead singer and songwriter, Kiaran Crook, to talk about musical evolution, gigging, and… a massive loaf of bread.

Under Your Sky is the second full album the Sherlocks have released – how’s your music evolved since Live For the Moment(2017)?

“With this album we’ve sat down and looked at each song and for what it is, rather than just going straight into recording and getting everything down. We looked at the structure of the songs, the lyrics of the songs and then obviously the production…I think with first album we seemed to layer everything up too much, like we’d do a guitar track and we’d end up tracking like 20 guitars. And listening back it still sounds good, but it sounds a lot fuller, there’s no space. And I think that’s the main thing we wanted to achieve with this record is to have a bit more space… You can pick the instruments out rather than just being a wall of sound, so I’d say that’s the main thing”. 

Do you have a favourite song on the album?

“Yeah, mine’s probably Under Your Sky. A couple of other lads like Dreams – that’s good too. I think with Under Your Sky I just like how big it sounds – like it sounds massive… I think Brandon and Josh like Dreams because it sounds pretty fresh for us, and I don’t think it sounds like  anything we’ve done before. Like it sounds more acoustic-y, but it’s still rocky… and it’s a fast-paced tune, but with more acoustic sounds… it sounds a little bit like a DMAs kind of tune.” 

Have you been playing them a lot on tour so far, or have you gone straight into the studio?

“No, we’ve been holding them back. The only tunes we’ve been playing are the singles so each time we released a single then we’ll start to play it. But apart from that we’ve kept then all pretty much under wraps. I think we’ve played we’ve played NYC (Sing it Loud), Magic Man, Waiting, we’ll start playing Under Your Sky… It feels like we’ve been playing the first album for so long now. To have some fresh songs it just feels like a dream for us. And obviously the fans are ready for it as well, when we go on tour it’s just going to fuse right. Everyone’s ready for new music. I’m a fan of music anyway so I know how it feels for a band that I like to bring new music out. It’s just so exciting so can’t wait. We’re all just buzzing to go out”. 

Are there any venues or cities you feel particularly excited about playing?

“Sheffield. That’s a big one. I think we all feel that we’re ready for just playing a good gig in Sheffield. I don’t know why but it just feels like it’s been ages since we’ve played Sheffield. I’d say that that’s the main one to be fair, but  we’re obviously looking forward to them all. I think it’s just because it’s close to home. We live 15 minutes outside of Sheffield, but Sheffield’s the nearest place where we’d go for a night out and a drink and stuff. Me, especially I’m always out in Sheffield, and it’s got a bit of a vibe. I think Sheffield fans as well have got on board with us from the start. They always seem to have got our music. It didn’t take much persuading, it was just like these are tunes and they seemed to get it. And then that’s followed on with this next album as well”.

Doyou feel you’ve got more of a fanbase up North, or is it more spread around?

“I feel slightly yeah, but I feel like we can go anywhere in the UK and get pretty much the same reaction. A few years ago I think it would have been a lot different. When we were playing in London it wouldn’t have been as good as what it would have been in Sheffield. I think now we’re closing that gap where we can do a gig in London and it’s going to go off just as much as a Sheffield gig. But that’s all down to people learning about your band and how your fans react and stuff”.

Do you prefer playing bigger venues or do you prefer smaller, more intimate ones?

“I have enjoyed playing these smaller ones. We’ve been doing a lot of acoustic gigs and stuff. But I think I’d still say the bigger the better for me. I love playing big gigs. We’re a fan of festivals as well. I think the only thing with festivals is there’s a lot more room for things going wrong. You obviously don’t get as much time to play as what you would at your own show. But that’s sometimes nice as well because you play all you best songs and all the songs where you think crowd are gonna get it a lot easier. Your bigger tunes”.

Do you ever get tired of playing your most popular songs, such as ‘Chasing Shadows’?

“I mean I always enjoy playing Chasing Shadows. There’s maybe some songs I don’t like as much, maybe Heart of Gold on the first album. I’m maybe not as fussed about playing it but as soon as it kicks in and you see people reacting then straight away you just snap out of it. I don’t think we’d ever be one of those bands that refuses to play a well-known tune just because we’re bored of it. To me that’s just a little bit selfish. Even if I’m bored of playing a tune that’s still what people come to see, I feel like we owe it to them”.

You’ve toured with quite a few big names, like the Libertines. Do you find it affects the music you’re writing like when you’re touring with them?

“I think it does. If you get the chance to watch it as well. We played with King of Leon in Sheffield Arena and we stayed to watch them, and you learn what sounds good in a certain space. Watching King of Leon was class, they sounded huge. And then you start listening to the songs and how they are, and you realize they write those kind of songs because they sound big. As a band as time goes on your own you start to learn what sounds good in a venue as opposed to what sounds good in your practice room, so you tailor your music and you song writing around that a little bit. I know I do. Now write songs where I think – this’ll will go off in a venue. I don’t think you can base it all on that because sometimes you’ve just got to let the song turn out however it needs to turn out. Certainly when you get to the studio you could probably make thing sound bigger. There are just certain parts that sound good in big venues and stuff – which is where we want to be playing: big venues, and be as big as we can be”.

What’s your songwriting process?

“It usually starts with me on an acoustic guitar – I write the bulk of the song. Recently, on the second record I’ve been making little demos and playing it to the band, just so they can get their head round the song, so they can hear the song a little bit easier and it takes less time and they think ‘right, so that’s how it needs to sound’. Then I just teach them the parts, and get it to a point where we’ll all happy with it. We’re pretty easy going when we get in the studio with somebody, we’re not really like, ‘it’s got to be this way or no way’. We just hand the reigns over to the producer and see what he’s got to offer. And obviously if we didn’t like it we could say, but more times than not the producer adds something that we couldn’t do. I think you’ve got to be open to ideas when you’re in the studio. There’s always somebody else with a better idea to what you might have”.

The band is two sets of brothers. Do you find that adds to the band, or can it get quite difficult being so close all the time? 

“It just depends on how you work as brothers… I think so long as you’re not suffocating each other and doing each other’s head in, it’s all good. We’ve got the balance right now. We’ve been in a band ten years, so we know what annoys each other – and that doesn’t stop us, we still like to annoy each other! But it’s more when’s the right time to do it”. 

You’ve got bigger progressively over the past couple of years. Have you noticed any negatives of that, or is it ‘the bigger the better’ at the moment?

“I mean there’s always negatives but as long as you don’t take it too seriously… I just crack on. My job is to write songs and write the best songs I can. And I can only base that on what I hear. I can’t write a song thinking about what other people think is a good song. I’ve just got to write a song and if it sounds good to me then that’s it. And then show it to the boys and see if they like it and that’s the main thing, and then take it from there really and put it out. And if people like it then it’s done its job and if not then we just try and write a better song I suppose. I mean we could write the best song in the world and the rest of the lads could think it’s class, and we could release it, and the fans could think it’s unbelievable and then a review could say they don’t like it. So it doesn’t really matter to be fair. As long as the lads like it, as long as the fans like it and the record label like it, that’s all that matters to us”.

Are there any moments when you realised you’d become a band that people were starting to know?

“I don’t think I’ll ever see it like that. I feel like we’re still an up and coming band trying to scratch at the surface. We’re just trying our best to get as big as we can, but it’s hard to see how big you’re getting… We’re just focussed on the next thing all the time. We just want to get the single and then release the album and continue writing and touring. And then before you know it it’ll be over the tree, but I’m sure one day we’ll turn round and, depending on where we are, realise how far we’ve come”.

Do you have any standout/strange/funny gig moments? 

“We played Manchester once, a couple of tours ago – I think it was the biggest headline gig we’d done – at Victoria Warehouse… When we walked on there was this massive piece of bread. I think it’s called a cob – pretty much the same size as a loaf of bread but a round shape. It was absolutely massive, and it was just in front of my mike stand and obviously someone from the crowd had thrown it, but it couldn’t have landed in a funnier place. So I got to my mike stand and I just looked at Andy like ‘what’s that doing?”. And when I wasn’t singing I turned to Josh and I absolutely booted it as hard as a could, put my foot through it and it nearly took Josh’s head off, nearly hit Josh straight in the face. Who’s bringing that to a gig?”

Under Your Sky is available to stream and buy online in and in store.

Review: JOHN

0

I don’t really know what to expect when I walked in the Wheatsheaf. Music-wise, JOHN is thrashing and discordant, and I was curious to see how that translated to the stage. It was also my first time in the Wheatsheaf, and it was right in the middle of Freshers’ week so I’m pretty sure I was the only student there. The crowd was full of a lot of older people in leather jackets who gave me old rocker vibes, which was interesting for a band that sounds so new.

Opening for JOHN was Milo’s Planes, who John Newton (drummer and vocalist of JOHN) described as “Fugazi reborn” when I chatted to him before the show. They’re young, from Bristol and they are pure distortion-riddled, high tempo, doesn’t-take-itself-too-seriously fun. I was confused to see not one but two drummers on either side of the stage, but it all worked seamlessly – they took us on a journey as they controlled the music so that I didn’t realise how peaceful the room had gotten with their lazy strumming until they started screaming and I could feel the bass in my bones. This expert control of the atmosphere paired well with their contrastingly straightforward lyrics (“Alex IT DOESN’T MATTER, ALEX IT DOESN’T MATTER”) – I’m not quite sure who Alex is but I felt like I understood him. 

The sounds and samples they used were really interesting. The discordant noise of what I can only describe as wood being chainsawed in half cutting in to the emotional content of the lyrics in the second song was interesting to witness, and I was surprised when the drummer started leading the singing a few songs in. I felt like I was kept on my toes: there was never a dull moment. They jumped around the stage and had seemed to have a lot of fun, and the performance felt like it was being made up as they went along. Their subtle digs at each other and overall lightheartedness made the room feel comfortable. It set the tone for JOHN well but the band was talented in their own right. I feel like sometimes in concerts, the opening act can wear a crowd down but because Milo’s Planes had their own strong sound, I felt anticipation for how JOHN would differ.

“Hey, I’m John, He’s John, we’re JOHN.” With a concise opening JOHN played, starting with one of their older songs ‘Squad Vowels’. JOHN have always said they are a “live band first”, and I was able to see first-hand why: the sound just envelops the room, I felt like my ears were bleeding, but I didn’t care. I just wanted to head-bang without a worry as they took over. Despite being chained down by their instruments, both John’s really controlled the stage and the movement of the crowd. The richness of the sound that they create with only two people also blew me away – it never once felt like there was anything missing. Instead it’s rather clever how they take their “ weakness” and convert it into a strength through the sheer force and energy they put into their performance. The sweat was dripping down both John’s faces within one song and I respected that.

They continued into their second song , which is a track from their latest album Out here on the Fringes, ‘Future Thinker’. The crowd was quite small and quiet, so I really appreciated how in between songs, as they caught their breaths, JOHN chatted and tried to rile the crowd up. “You’re all very polite. Shout something mean.”. “ You’ve got shit legs!” referring to Drummer Newton’s bare legs, followed by some hearty chuckles. It was a very warm and welcoming atmosphere as John went on to talk about how Iggy Pop also liked this song, or how John’s mum was in the crowd that night. It is these details that separate the experience of streaming and going to listen to live music. Their performance was incredible and lived up to the expectations I had when I first streamed the album, but what really made this gig into one that I will remember is the interactions between the band and the audience, and their stage presence. At one point Newton’s drumstick flew halfway through the air on to the middle of the stage. It seems that this wasn’t the first time as he just grabbed another drumstick and didn’t miss a beat. Partway through their set, Johnny’s (Guitar/bass) guitar lost a string before losing some more. It wasn’t a reason to panic – he plucked it off and went back to playing. I appreciate a band that brings more than just a perfect rendition of their tracks, especially to a small stage like the Wheatsheaf. 

They continued with a flurry of songs from their latest album such as ‘Fringes’, ‘Western Wild’, and my favourite, ‘Midnight Supermarket’, as well as some old favourites from their first album. ‘Midnight Supermarket’ was a pleasure to see live as I always wondered how they changed their sound to play it – it is slower and more ambient than their other songs. John brings out another set of drumsticks solely for Midnight Supermarket as they slowed it down. They start by beginning with their usual joking around in between sets, a few chords here and there and it slowly developed into the song. Overall the setlist was ordered in a way that it controlled the vibe of the venue well throughout and it all blended together well. 

JOHN and Milo’s Planes are two up-and-coming bands that I recommend wholeheartedly for those times that you want to not think and just move. My only regret is that this concert was in 0th week  – could really have used the stress relief around 5th week!

JOHN’s new album “Out Here On The Fringes” came out on October 4th – you can listen on Spotify or buy here

EGG – A Musical Parable

0

In early September, the IOC published an article celebrating the life of ‘Father of Modern Olympic Games’ Pierre Coubertin. Whilst highlighting his struggles in launching a modern revolution, bringing about a grand feast that aimed to resemble the spirits of the ancient Greeks and celebrate sport on a worldwide scale, it also illustrated the complexities of contemporary realities – namely the politics and wars of early twentieth-century Europe – which largely hindered and tainted his grand ambitions. His experiences act as vivid reminders of the complicated power dynamics behind the façade of Olympic Games, especially in terms of politics and history, which deprives the Games from possibly achieving their sacred and, perhaps more importantly, ‘pure’ status that Coubertin envisioned.

As the 2016 Olympic Games concluded in Rio, the next host nation, Japan, was given a section of around eight minutes to present a teaser of what was to come. The blend between sports and pop culture on top of the mix between upbeat jazz and contemporary dance gained widespread appraisal. The organisers successfully demonstrated a unity between the country’s rich history and advanced modernity, especially during the end piece where the dancers, dressed in bright white and red, brandished flags of Hinomaru and then proceeded to position themselves to form the futuristic skyline of Tokyo.

In seeking the origins of that very piece, however, the message conveyed here by the organisers becomes very interesting. The piece was a rendition of the original, performed by SOIL & PIMP SESSIONS and written by prominent Japanese musician Sheena Ringo. Titled ‘望遠鏡の外の景色/Bōenkyō no Soto no Keshiki’ (literally: view outside the telescope), it was originally written for Noda Hideaki’s 2012 play ‘Egg’ and was performed during the curtain call. The play, relatively unknown in the West, is a blatant critique of Japan’s war in Manchuria in the 1940s and its attitudes towards it. The story unfolds as a theatre director, played by Noda, discovers a draft of a play about a number of ambitious athletes who pursued victory against the Chinese in a peculiar sport named ‘egg’, where players aim to pierce a hole in the shell of a raw egg without breaking it. In the first hour or so the play rather successfully disguises itself as a modern farce about love and sports, centred around an energetic newcomer to the sport and his adoration for a pop idol who also happens to be the daughter of the owner of the sports club. At times it seems to be a bizarre critique of Japan’s pop industry and consumerism, though still incorporating strong literary flavours highlighted by the lines of Lautréamont and Busse. In the second half, however, the pace accelerates drastically, and the audience is taken from ‘the present’ back to the year 1964, and then eventually to 1940. It soon becomes apparent that it was the Olympics that linked three different realities in this timeline. The 1964 Games allowed Japan to begin to forget the atrocities of the war and demonstrate the country’s miraculous post-war recovery, while 1940 saw the Japanese Olympic Committee’s announcement to abandon plans for hosting the summer games in Tokyo due to the ongoing war in north-eastern China. Yet, the most shocking reveal is the identity of the sport ‘egg’, the essence of the entire play. In a black-and-white video, the audience is introduced the true nature of the ‘sport’: a biological weapon developed by students of Tokyo Imperial University and nurses of Unit 731 – an infamous unit under the Japanese Army responsible for much of Japan’s war crimes during the Second World War. The pop idol is revealed as a puppet, used by the authorities to entertain the Japanese soldiers, while the ambitious newcomer becomes the scapegoat of the chief researcher behind the project, who eventually retreats to Japan along with the higher authorities. At the end of the play, the protagonists, blinded by their fervent love for their country, are ultimately betrayed by it, fading as a bright, crimson red coloured summer Manchurian sky.

Haunted by the controversies that surrounded the 1936 Games hosted by Nazi Germany, Coubertin wrote the following lines for its closing ceremony: ‘The choices and struggles of history will carry on, but gradually understanding will replace dreadful ignorance; mutual understanding will soothe impulsive hatreds. In this way, what I have worked toward for half a century will be strengthened.’ Perhaps fortunately, Coubertin would not live to see the outbreak of WWII, nor the trauma and devastation it would bring on a worldwide scale that further shattered his visions. From the end of the War till this day, the Olympics, though commonly seen as a symbol of peace and unity, remain closely intertwined with and often troubled by politics, as the massacre at the 1972 Games and the boycotts of the three subsequent Games can demonstrate. For Japan, while the Showa-era is now commonly viewed in the nostalgic light of prosperity and recovery, it would be impossible for Japan to not address the period of imperialism and rapid expansionism which Noda’s work illustrated as fanatic and maniacal, when it attempts to show off its culture and history.

Noda’s play is a vivid and extremely impactful artistic reflection of the past, and the title of the piece of music corresponds with a line from the play: ‘I use the telescope in reverse, because the faraway views becomes small, and the past becomes distant.’ After an impressive demonstration at Rio, the organisers, in a rather subtle way, presented a powerful reminder for the world: as we keep marching on and keep moving forward into the ever-uncertain future in this fast-paced modernity, we mustn’t forget the lessons taught by history.

Friends of the Earth Present Vision of Carbon Neutral Oxford

0

Friends of the Earth, an international network of environmentalist organisations, has published a new report entitled “Fast Forward Oxfordshire” detailing their vision of a sustainable Oxford by the year 2040.

Published earlier this week, the report highlights the magnitude of the impending climate breakdown and outlines steps which must be taken on both a local and national level in government to deliver a fairer and healthier society.

Friends of the Earth Oxford begin the report by setting out the need for dramatic and fundamental changes to address climate collapse.

They assert that the changes currently being made fail to meet the pace of what is required to avoid environmental collapse.

Divided into six sectors: homes & settlements, transport, work, energy, food, and nature, each section begins with a short description of an ordinary scenario in 2040, but whose artefacts differ drastically from contemporary life.

In one example, a pair of friends decide to eat out at a restaurant. Unusually, they decide that they will eat from the restaurant’s “meat” page. In this alternative society, meat has become a rare experience which is described as “strange and different.’’

Additional proposed edits to the county include a new tram railway service, a set of long-distance bike routes, the re-inclusion of beavers in the county’s ecosystem, and a new electric vehicle plant in Cowley.

Oxford City Councillor Tom Hayes, Cabinet Member for Zero Carbon Oxford, said: “It’s not enough to declare a climate emergency and fail to follow up with action. “I strongly welcome this facts-first report which gives the councils that I work with more of the solutions they need to meet the climate crisis. Some of the suggested policies will be challenging to implement, but we must rise to the challenge.

“It’s not just about getting serious about becoming a zero carbon county it’s also about enjoying cleaner transport, homes to be proud of, and greener spaces.”

Aside from combatting climate change, the report makes the case for a range of societal changes intended to improve universal quality of life and encourage a “safer” society.

For example, Fast Forward Oxfordshire says that travellers should be pushed away from cars towards more sustainable means of transport, like trains or cycling.

The suggested policies include workplace parking levies, congestion charging and even constraining road space.

While commuters are driven away from driving, cycling and rail infrastructure should be improved, including the commissioning of new rail links and re-commissioning of old, now disused rail lines.

Although the report made no specific requests or references to Oxford University, there is a general call to use public investment to minimise inequality.

It also promotes the advantages of harnessing the spending power of ‘anchor institutions’ which includes universities.

A spokesperson for the University of Oxford said: “The University, our staff and our students are deeply engaged in improving our sustainability.

“Through our Green Impact scheme, around 6,500 members of staff and students have taken actions to encourage more sustainable workplaces. Our Student Switch-Off campaign, which encourages practical energy saving and recycling, involves more than 3,000 students every year.

“The University has invested over £4 million in carbon reduction projects and emissions have fallen steadily since 2010, despite a large expansion in the size of the University estate.

“The University switched to a 100% wind power supply from Scottish Power in 2017, for which we pay a premium.

“More than 4,200 square metres of solar power panels have been installed across the University estate. “We know there is more to be done and will continue to work with partners across Oxfordshire on actions to tackle climate change.”

Oxford colleges hosting group with “homophobic, misogynistic and Islamophobic views”

0

Oxford colleges have been annually hosting the summer camp of the evangelical Christian group the Ravi Zacharias Trust, despite the Oxford SU having previously called for the University to “distance itself publicly” due to concerns over the group’s “homophobic, misogynistic and Islamophobic views”.

The week-long residential camp was held at Merton College this July with speakers including Prof. John Lennox, Oxford Emeritus Professor of Maths. It was convened by Sam Alberry, who promotes the principle of “agape love” or celibacy for homosexual Christians.

The Ravi Zacharias Trust is the European branch of the US-based Ravi Zacharias International Ministries (RZIM), founded and led by the evangelical Christian apologist Ravi Zacharias. RZIM shares an academic director, Dr Joseph Boot, with the Wilberforce Academy. The Academy was banned from colleges including Trinity, Jesus and Lady Margaret Hall due to the views of their founders, Christian Concern.

Oxford SU told Cherwell: “The University of Oxford should be a safe and welcoming space for all people, hosting events that jeopardise this are counterintuitive. We need to take action on the intolerance and hatred in its most extreme forms, but uprooting it wherever it exists and stop events like this happening on campus. We are calling for Colleges and the University to be more responsible when taking commercial bookings and setting a precedent that makes campus inclusive.”

The SU first became aware of the group’s presence in 2015, after the University expressed concern over the Trust’s close association with Wycliffe Hall in their PPH report.

The college and the ministry jointly established the Oxford Centre for Christian Apologetics in 2006, with Ravi Zacharias himself listed as one of the teaching fellows. The University expressed concern about the Centre because its “admissions to the centre were not clearly differentiated to the university,” raising questions about the rigour of the Hall’s assessment process.

Today, the Centre is wholly run by RZIM, although the Centre’s “Team” include Max Baker-Hytch, a professor at Wycliffe Hall and those participating in the Centre’s programmes have the opportunity to be accommodated in single rooms at the college. Despite the SU’s calls for the University to find “clear ways” to show that “the wider University is not in sympathy” with such views, Queen’s College hosted the Trust’s camp in the summer of 2015.

Speaking to Cherwell, a spokesperson for the Trust said: “Zacharias Trust did not respond to the call by the Student Union four years ago, as the proceedings were only known to students — thus, we were not invited to respond. Our organisation believes in the sanctity and value of all human life regardless of ethnicity, sexual orientation or gender. The women we employ occupy some of the highest positions of leadership within our organization, and we also employ individuals with same-sex attractions.

“As a Christian organisation, some people will naturally disagree with our viewpoint. When disagreements in faith or philosophy arise, no matter the audience, we urge civil dialogue. Any claim otherwise is false and unsubstantiated.

“Lastly, we are grateful for our relationships with some of the colleges and we have never had any issues using their facilities.”

Merton College JCR President told Cherwell: “Merton JCR is proud to hold the values of inclusion and equality at its core, and that is something we strive to promote amongst students through cooperation with college.”

RZIM’s purpose “is to reach and challenge those who shape the ideas of a culture with the credibility of the Gospel of Jesus Christ” which they facilitate through their “global team of speakers” based at their interna- tional offices. According to the Ministries’ website, their staff members work in 43 different countries, and their videos and blogs attract 60,000 users per month.

Ravi Zacharias, a self-claimed former sceptic, first launched RZIM in 1984, after securing financial backing from American evangelist Billy Graham. He first forged links with the preacher after being invited to speak at the plenary of his Amsterdam conference in 1983. Zacharias featured in one of Billy Graham’s video sermons as late as 2012.

The Association also works in the UK and was the subject of controversy in 2017. Critics of the group, including other Christian Anglicans, called for Graham’s son Franklin, CEO of the Association, to be banned from the UK after alleging his comments about LGBTQ rights and Islam were a violation of laws on hate speech.

In 2017, Ravi Zacharias was forced to issue a statement regarding a misrepresentation of his association with Oxford and Cambridge universities.

According to Christianity Today, his 2015 biography, now corrected, on the RZIM website read that he held “six doctorate degrees” when he had only been awarded honorary degrees.

In a statement, RZIM stated that referring Mr Zacharias as “Dr.” was “appropriate and acceptable practice with honorary doctorates” although they admitted the practice was “contentious.”

He also claimed to be a Senior Research Fellow at Wycliffe Hall, a line which has been subsequently removed.

They said: “Ravi’s desire and our desire as an evangelistic ministry is to engage the honest skeptic, to take questions seriously, and to be as clear as possible in our communication. We therefore have restructured Ravi’s biography to better reflect his 45 years as an itinerant evangelist and apologist.”

Zacharias’ Spotify artist account still refers to him as “Dr”.

The camp included prominent evangelical activists that promote celibacy, including Sam Allberry, editor at the Gospel Coalition and David Bennett, a self-described “former gay activist.”

Sam Allberry was the founding editor of Living Out, a magazine that claims “to help Christian brothers and sisters who experience same-sex attraction stay faithful to Biblical teaching.”

Writing in 2016 for the Gospel Coalition, Allberry said: “Sexual unfulfillment itself becomes a means of deepening our sense of the fuller, deeper satisfaction we await in Jesus. It helps us to hunger more for him. We skip the appetizer, but we await the entrée. Celibacy isn’t a waste of our sexuality; it’s a wonderful way offulfilling it.

“For marriage to be a parable of Christ and the church, it must be between like and unlike, male and female. Change this arrangement, and you end up distorting the spiritual reality to which it points. Alter marriage, and you end up distorting a picture of the gospel itself.”

Living Out and the Oxford Centre for Christian Apologetics itself are both considered organisations that hold “similar values” to the True Freedom Trust, and feature on the latter’s website. In April 2019, a conference held by the Freedom Trust was protested after describing the event as promoting “a form of gay conversion therapy.”

Allberry was one of the signatories, which also included Head of Welfare at St Edmund’s Hall Will Donaldson and former Pembroke Chaplain Greg Downes, by “concerned Anglicans” of the Oxford Diocese earlier this year that called for the bishops to define the “appropriate setting for sexual intimacy – namely in marriage between a man and a woman”.

Allberry was also among the signatories of the 2017 evangelical manifesto, the Nashville Statement, which The Guardian described as “a proclamation denouncing LGBT rights and anyone who supports them.”

The Statement was designed as a response to the “post Christian” age, where “common to think that human identity as male and female is not part of God’s beautiful plan, but is, rather, an expression of an individual’s autonomous preferences.”

The Statement’s list of affirmations and denials includes a denial that “adopting a homosexual or transgender self-conception is consistent with God’s holy purposes in creation and redemption.”

Eliel Cruz, founder of the Faithfully LGBT Project, attacked the Statement in the New York Times, writing that the Statement “represents a renewed commitment to open bigotry.”

Allberry tweeted at the time: “The Nashville Statement brings much needed clarity to issues where there is often silence, pain and confusion.”

The opening address of this year’s summer camp was given by Os Guinness, author and co-founder of the Trinity Forum, a group that aims to “cultivate, curate, and disseminate the best of Christian thought” by “seek(ing) to connect thinking leaders with leading thinkers” in global policymaking.

Guinness’ co-founder is Alonzo MacDonald who established the McDonald-Agape Foundation, which describes itself as “a support group for scholars and other dedicated leaders to serve Jesus Christ.”

The Foundation lists Prof. John Biggar as its collaborative scholar in Oxford, and funded Biggar’s “Ethics and Empire” project in 2017. The project attracted criticism from Common Ground and Dan Iley-Williamson, lecturer at Queen’s College and Labour Councillor, who described Biggar at the time as an “ardent apologist for colonialism.”

Guinness was also a guest speaker at US evangelical pastor Rick Warren’s Saddleback Church in the April 2015. In 2008, Obama caused outrage after he selected the pastor for his inauguration due to Warren’s opposition to abortion and same-sex marriage.