Tuesday, May 13, 2025
Blog Page 665

Brasenose leads Veggie Pledge

0

Over 1,000 people have signed up to participate in this year’s Veggie Pledge, with Braesnose taking an early lead in the college league.

The Veggie Pledge is an annual scheme organised by the Oxford Student Union aiming to encourage people to reduce their meat intake throughout the month of November.

Colleges are encouraged to promote Veggie Pledge through a league table. As of last Sunday, Braesnose College is currently in the lead with 119 students, 20% of the college, signed up.

Wadham is in second place, with 95 college members signed up. The college has also recently passed a motion to have an additional meat-free day provided by the catering department.

VP Charities and Community Officer, Rosanna Greenwood called the Pledge “the flagship campaign” for environmentalism.

Greenwood told Cherwell: “Now in its 3rd Year, Veggie Pledge is bigger than ever – smashing 1000 pledges!

“It’s the flagship campaign encouraging students to be more environmentally and sustainably conscious throughout the month of November.

“Everyone can be involved in Veggie Pledge in some way whether reducing meat intake, taking Tupperware to Gloucester Green Market or using less palm oil.

“Pledging is open until Wednesday 7th, so make sure you join the Facebook group and take part!”

Last year’s winner, St Hugh’s College, have passed a motion to only provide vegetarian food at JCR meetings throughout the month.

The motion noted the college’s “strong legacy of commitment to the November Veggie Pledge”, with 282 pledges made last year.

A number of eateries in Oxford are also offering discounted for those participating in the scheme this month, with Bill’s offering 20% discount on all vegetarian and vegan food and Crisis Cafe on George Street offering a 15% discount.

Jeff Koons to exhibit 17 works at Ashmolean

0

Contemporary artist Jeff Koons is set to stage a rare exhibition of his artwork at the Ashmolean Museum in spring 2019.

The exhibition will be curated by Koons himself, in collaboration with art historian Norman Rosenthal, and will include 14 works that have never been on display in the UK before.

The announcement of Koons’ exhibition comes a year after the artist visited Oxford to accept an award from the Edgar Wind Society, the University’s only art history society.

The Society’s former president, Oli Lloyd-Parry, told Cherwell: “My invitation was the first invitation to Oxford that Mr Koons had accepted and the visit forged a relationship with the University.”

“Mr Koons became fascinated by the Ashmolean Museum when my collaborator Mallica Kumbera Landus, the former Andrew W. Mellon Teaching Curator at the Ashmolean Museum, and I gave him a tour of the permanent collection.

“Mr Koons was incredibly generous with his time and relished engaging with the
diverse student body that constitutes the Edgar Wind Society.

“I am delighted that the Edgar Wind Society has been able to facilitate this rare UK museum exhibition of Mr Koons’ art.

“I cannot think of a more appropriate place to present this important exhibition than within the Ashmolean Museum of Art and Archeology, the world’s oldest public museum which explores the stories of human existence across cultures and through time using its prestigious collection which ranges from objects of antiquity to contemporary art – a fitting location which really resonates with Mr Koons’ work.”

The Society awarded Koons an Honorary Membership for Outstanding Contribution to Visual Culture, which was established in 2016 by Lloyd-Parry to recognise the achievements of contemporary artists.

The Ashmolean’s director, Xa Sturgis, told The Guardian: “It is hard to think of any other artist of the last 50 years who has such a significant and influential place in how we think about what art is today.”

Koons is known for his sculptural works depicting objects from popular culture, such as balloon animals. One such Balloon Dog (Orange) was sold for $58.4 million in 2013, the highest price fetched at auction for the work of a living artist.

The exhibition will run at the Ashmolean Museum from 7th February to 9th June 2019.

OULC passes motion mandating ‘educational discussion’ on antisemitism

0

Oxford University Labour Club (OULC) has passed an amended motion mandating the Club to “hold an educational discussion on the history of antisemitism on the left”.

The motion comes after a summer in which the issue of antisemitism plagued the national Labour Party.

Referring to recent issues of antisemitism on the left, the motion read: “Antisemitism is an ideological poison which, by seeking to explain the world in conspiratorial terms and pose as a politics of resistance to the powers-that-be, is particularly and specifically toxic for the left.”

However, during the debate an amendment was tabled and eventually passed, to remove a section of the original motion, which noted: “The issue of antisemitism has been cynically exploited for factional ends by the right, both within the party and more widely.”

The member who proposed the amendment removing this section said in the meeting: “I actually think that it’s almost more factional to make it into a left/right within the party issue.

“When you’re talking about the is-sue of antisemitism being ‘cynically exploited for factional ends by the right within the party’, I really don’t think that’s helpful to fighting antisemitism whether you’re on the left or on the right of the party, or wherever in the party.

“We should all be committed to fighting it.”

In support of the amendment, another Club member said: “I think its brilliant that this motion is actually being put forward, and substantively I agree with the vast majority of it, because it is such a pernicious issue across the entirety of the left.

“But I think if we really want this motion to be as strong as possible then it really needs to be able to draw as much support as possible from the entire party.

“The best way to do that is having a motion that everybody can really get behind, that doesn’t pin the blame on anybody, that just signifies a general commitment to take this forward as an issue and to absolutely ensure that this kind of pernicious evil is eradicated from the party by everyone.

“So perhaps if we drop that sentence it would allow it to have to scope to draw everybody behind it in a meaningful way.”

During the meeting it was raised that the wording of the motion was important, because of OULC’s “very recent issue of antisemitism”.

In 2016, OULC was investigated by now-Somerville Principal, Baroness Janet Royall. Her report concluded that then members of the club had engaged in anti-Semitic acts.

In June, a motion was passed by the club condemning Labour MP Chris Williamson for his “actions and statements regarding antisemitism”. The motion also said that “antisemitism, anti-Semites, and those who excuse or absolve them, have no place in the Labour Party”.

Another separate motion at the meet-ing was debated which if passed would have mandated OULC to campaign for a “People’s Vote with an option to remain” in the EU, and to “call for Labour to come out for remain in such a vote”.

The motion was rejected by OULC members, mirroring the policy of the national Labour Party to reject calls for another EU referendum.

An earlier caption of this Facebook upload referenced a clause that was, as described in the article itself, rejected by a majority at the meeting. As by itself this was potentially misleading, the caption has been amended. We apologise for the oversight.

International breaks should be here to stay

0

Taking a weekend off from the Premier League to make time for international football has long been a source of annoyance among football fans. Typically boring and unmotivated matches, more often than not ending in a loss or goalless draw where England are concerned, are not quite up to the standard of excitement we come to expect from the usual weekend league matches. Liverpool manager Jurgen Klopp recently called the newly formed UEFA Nations League “the most senseless competition in the world” for the unnecessary added strain it puts on players.

Although it is true that international matches are disruptive to players’ routines, with Brazilian internationals recently flying to the US for a mere five days in the break to play two friendlies, the matches are not without their positives. After a post-World Cup lull for English supporters, excitement around the national team has been renewed by the surprising brilliance they showed in their Nations League win against Spain the weekend before last, showing that the importance of international fixtures should not, in my opinion, be written off.

Although Klopp’s criticism of the Nations League may have been harsh, he did make a valid point concerning the added risk involved in overworking players. Dele Alli suffered a hamstring injury during England’s 2-1 loss to Spain in September, which put him out of action for Spurs’ next clashes against Liverpool and Inter Milan, leading some to question whether the international result was worth this sacrifice.

The disruption caused by the international break to clubs and managers is understandably frustrating, as teams are unable to settle into a string of League matches before some of their key players are shipped off around the world. You only need to look at the contrast in relationship between Rashford and Southgate, and with Mourinho, and observe the difference in play between his recent club and country performances, to see the impact having alternating managers can have. Mourinho came out of the September international break having to defend his lack of use of Rashford, after the striker scored twice in two England matches, and this lack of continuity in managerial style seems undermining for everyone involved.

Nevertheless, despite all these factors, there seems to be something important about retaining the regular international fixtures. The England team were praised over the summer for the cohesion and chemistry the players seemed to have, their relationships off the pitch apparently positively affecting their performance on it. With too much of a gap between international fixtures, national teams would risk losing their connectedness and relationship as a team, a factor we would be stupid to overlook. Replacing the majority of international friendlies with Nations League matches was greeted by some criticism, but seems to have had an overall positive impact.

For the lower teams, the league ranking system provides some much-needed motivation at an international level, as can be clearly seen by Gibraltar’s exultant celebrations after their first ever competitive international win, over Armenia, in the last break. Possibly the problem with international fixtures in the past has been the lack of excitement in friendly matches; England’s win against Switzerland three days after their loss to Spain in September did not come as much consolation as the match didn’t count for anything.

Having a competitive format provides the impetus that drove England to redress this loss the weekend before last. If Spain had beaten them, England would have been out of the Nations League; as it stands they now still have a chance to progress. It is this sort of incentive that has re-injected a spurt of energy to the international fixtures, and which will keep the momentum up for when the qualifying matches for the Euros come around in March.

Could the international format be improved? Probably. Should it be scrapped altogether? Undoubtedly not. Whatever their faults, an England match gives an opportunity to put everyone’s club differences aside and unite under one aim. Whether England progress in the Nations League or not, the matches will have been largely exciting, and a good addition to the football calendar.

As for complaints about an overcrowded match schedule, tournaments like the Carabao Cup should perhaps be the first contender for re-evaluation in that regard; international breaks give a different perspective of play, remind us of why we love events like the World Cup, and we should ultimately try to savour them as much as possible.

Stormy Daniels to visit Oxford Union

1

Stormy Daniels, the adult film star who alleges she was paid “hush money”, by Donald Trump is coming to the Oxford Union on the 15th November.

Daniels, whose accusations were confirmed when President Trump’s personal lawyer said he paid Ms. Daniels “at the direction of the candidate”, and “for the principal purpose of influencing the election”, will be speaking on how “stigmatizing the adult industry and people who work in it is bad for society” according to the Union’s Term Card.

Union President Stephen Horvath told Cherwell “For some, Stormy Daniels is a feminist icon for unashamedly standing up to President Trump; to others, she is merely an opportunist seeking fame.

“No matter your stance, it is undeniable that Stormy Daniels has challenged the President in a prominent and public way, and we are looking forward to hearing that story.”

Daniels’ talk at the Union is entitled “Sex, Guns & Other Fluff:  How Porn Can Set You Free”, and will reportedly focus on the importance of destigmatising the adult entertainment industry.

Having appeared on talk shows ranging from Jimmy Kimmel to Fox and Friends as well as playing herself in a cameo on Saturday Night Live, Daniels’s book “Full Disclosure” which details her alleged encounters with President Trump was released earlier this year.

The talk will be held at the Oxford Union 5PM on Wednesday 15th November.

Alice Weidel cancels visit to the Oxford Union

2

Alice Weidel has cancelled her visit to the Oxford Union, following widespread pressure from student groups. 

The leader of the far-right German Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) party was due to speak the Union later this month. However, Cherwell understands she has now cancelled the event.

It follows a widespread condemnation of the Union’s invite to Weidel, with Oxford SU, Oxford University Labour Club, and various anti-racist groups writing letters and passing motions of disapproval. There were also plans for protests outside the Union on the day of her fist.

The Oxford Union President, Stephen Horvath, told Cherwell: “Alice Weidel has cancelled her planned trip to the UK next week due to concerns with the security arrangements for aspects of her travel and engagements

“We regret to inform members that she will therefore not be speaking at the Union.”

Last week, Cherwell reported on how The Silk Road Panel of Central Asian ambassadors had to be relocated to a college venue following concerns over “anticipated anti-free speech protests” incited by Weidel’s visit. It is unclear as yet whether the Union will now host the event again.

Student societies sign open letter calling for retraction of Weidel invitation

0

28 student societies and campaigns have signed an open letter calling for the Oxford Union to immediately withdraw their invitation to Alice Weidel.

The leader of the far-right German political party Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) is scheduled to speak at the Union next Wednesday, 7th November.

The open letter reads: “As Student Societies of Oxford University, we write to express our grave concern at the Oxford Union’s decision to host leader of the far-right German political party Alternative für Deutschland (AfD), Alice Weidel. We wish to make clear that Weidel and her values are not welcome in our community.

“Since Weidel joined the party in 2012, she has pushed racist, Islamophobic and dehumanising rhetoric about migrants and refugees. Earlier this year, she used a Bundestag debate to denounce ‘girls in headscarves, knife-wielding men on government benefits and other good-for nothing people.’ She has described refugees as ‘illiterate’ and derided ‘grabby migrants’ who she claims bring ‘stone age Sharia populism’ to Germany. When asked in 2015 if she believes Islam poses a danger to Germany, she replied ‘of course.’

“Since 2016 (Weidel became co-leader in 2017), the AfD has adopted an explicitly anti-Islam policy. Its most recent election manifesto contained a section on why ‘Islam does not belong to Germany.’ The party has also has drafted the proposals to ban ‘the construction and operation’ of mosques, claiming that they contribute ‘to the spread of Islamic teachings directed towards the removal of our legal order.’ AfD Party officials have called for migrants to be shot on sight at the border. Their manifesto is also distinctly homophobic, claiming that a ‘family’ can consist only of a father, mother and children.

“We find it deeply concerning that this individual representing the Alternative für Deutschland should be invited to speak at the Oxford Union. Weidel’s reactionary, racist rhetoric stands in direct opposition to the student community’s values of equality and freedom from discrimination, contravenes the University’s own Equality policies, and goes against the central purpose of the University.

“We call on the Oxford Union to withdraw their invitation to Weidel immediately, in the name of justice and equality for all.”

On Wednesday November 7th, the Oxford Union will be hosting a talk by Alice Weidel, leader of the far-right German…

Posted by Oxford SU CRAE – Campaign for Racial Awareness and Equality on Friday, November 2, 2018

On their Facebook page, the Oxford SU Campaign for Racial Awareness and Equality (CRAE), who signed the letter, wrote: “[Weidel’s] party’s race-baiting, anti-Muslim politics stand in direct opposition to the values that our community prides itself on.”

The University’s LGBTQ+ Society, also signatories, added: “LGBTQ+ Soc supports the call for the Oxford Union to withdraw its invitation to far-right German politician, Alice Weidel.

“We consider the views she expresses to be Islamophobic, homophobic and racist, and we do not believe there is a place for the expression of hatred at this university. Furthermore, the format of this event – a speech, with only a brief Q&A – is not accessible, nor is it conducive to healthy debate.

“As a welfare society, we believe it is our duty to oppose the propagation of violent rhetoric in our university.”

In a Facebook post sharing the letter, an Oxford student said: “If they can use their platform to promote racism and facism, we can use the platform to criticise them for it.”

The Oxford Union has been contacted for comment on this joint letter.

In a previous statement to Cherwell, President of the Oxford Union, Stephen Horvath, said: “The Oxford Union remains committed to the principles of political neutrality and free speech, and we invite a variety of political leaders from different countries and competing ideological camps.

“In recent years, those perspectives featured and questioned at the Union have ranged from Julius Malema, leader of the radically leftist Economic Freedom Fighters in South Africa, to Marine Le Pen.

“Alice Weidel is the leader of the largest opposition party in the German Parliament. After Dr Weidel’s speech in the Union’s debating Chamber, members will be welcome to ask her questions, and challenge her views if they wish.”

Oxford SU and and the SU’s Campaign for Racial Awareness and Equality (CRAE) have also been contacted for comment.

The Oxford Union have since cancelled Weidel’s speaker event.

Union President Stephen Horvath told Cherwell: “Alice Weidel has cancelled her planned trip to the U.K. next week due to concerns with the security arrangements for aspects of her travels and engagements.

“We regret to inform members that she will therefore not be speaking at the Oxford Union.”

In a collective statement responding to the Union’s cancellation of the event, the signatories of the letter told Cherwell: “As Student Societies of Oxford University, we welcome the news that Alice Weidel will no longer be speaking at the Oxford Union next Wednesday.

“However, it is deeply regrettable that the Union saw fit to invite an unashamed racist to speak in the first place. We note that the Union has previously hosted speakers such as the BNP leader Nick Griffin, the leader of National Rally Marine Le Pen, and the Holocaust denier David Irving. This is not the first time that students have been forced to tell the Union that neither their values nor those of their speakers are acceptable and we don’t believe that it will be the last.

“We are proud of the collective effort of our community in opposing Weidel and the AfD and remain steadfast in our commitment to opposing fascism and racism, in all their forms.”

Out in Front: Lewis Hamilton’s fifth world title

0

Lewis Hamilton became one of only three men to win the Drivers’ World Championships after Sunday’s chaotic Mexican Grand Prix.

Red Bull Racing’s Max Verstappen was the man who stood atop the podium on the day, the 21-year-old capping off a highly impressive weekend with a dominant win where he led for 67 of 71 laps. Verstappen has built a reputation in his first 3 years in Formula 1 as an almost obsessively competitive driver. At times though, criticism has come his way when this competitiveness has blown over into overly aggressive and dangerous driving. In Mexico, however, we saw Verstappen fully in control, successfully protecting the car on a day where mechanical failure was rife and with a maturity that belied his years.

Verstappen was the fastest man on Friday and Saturday’s practice sessions but after missing out on pole position in qualifying he channelled his frustration and made Red Bull team principal Christian Horner proud: “I think it played on Max’s mind, and from the moment he turned up [on Sunday] you could see there was only going to be one guy coming through turns 1/2/3 in the lead. As soon as he emerged from the rst three corners with the lead, the rest of it he controlled brilliantly.”

Despite Verstappen’s masterful drive, it was always going to be Hamilton earning the plaudits after the chequered flag. After a very dominant season, Hamilton only needed to finish seventh at the Autódromo Hermanos Rodríguez to write himself into the history books alongside Juan Manuel Fangio and Michael Schumacher.

While lacking pace compared to Ferrari and Red Bull throughout the entire race weekend, the Stevenage born superstar still managed to produce a conservative and measured drive to bring the car home in a respectable fourth position. But in the media pit, surrounded by hordes of team mechanics, media pundits and fans, Hamilton wasn’t immediately jubilant at his feat over the course of the season: “It really doesn’t feel real at the moment… it feels like a normal day when you’ve had a bad race! I think it’s gonna take a while to sink in, but I honestly feel very humbled. I feel so conflicted, because in my heart I still want to win the race. It’s really weird, because I don’t really feel like celebrating. I’ve still got races I want to win and things I want to achieve this year.”

Coming second in Mexico and second in the Driver’s Standings, Hamilton’s rival Sebastian Vettel was gracious in defeat after his loss in the title race was confirmed.

“I congratulated him,” Vettel said after the race. “He drove superb all year and was the better one of us two, number five is something incredible. I congratulated him, asked him to keep pushing next year and we’ll fight him again.”

It was Verstappen and Hamilton who surged forward into first and second right from the first corner, leaving pole-sitter Daniel Ricciardo languishing in third. Ricciardo, after incredibly quick practice and qualifying sessions, found himself yet again plagued by the ongoing reliability issues that have led to his decision to leave Red Bull Racing at the end of this season. Sunday marked the Australian’s 8th DNF from just 19 races, compounding previous season’s reliability issues which led to six DNFs in 2017. Ricciardo is usually considered to be one of the more amiable and patient drivers on the grid, but was thunderous in the paddock post-race, saying:“You know, honestly, now where I am, I don’t see the point of coming on Sunday. I haven’t had a clean race or weekend in so long. I’m not superstitious or any of that … but the car’s cursed. I don’t have any more words.” Ricciardo will undoubtedly be hoping for better reliability from the team at Renault, where he will spend the 2019 season.

Misfortune also struck Force India’s hometown hero Sergio Pèrez, who until Sunday had never finished outside of the points in his native Mexico. To the dismay of the crowd, Pèrez was forced into retirement by a brake failure. A visibly dissapointed Pèrez reflected after the race: “We were doing a fantastic job. Seventh place was in my pocket, the team had a great strategy, but unfortunately it was not our afternoon,”

In the end, the expected coronation of Hamilton took place as scheduled, but this year’s Mexican Grand Prix was not without its flash-points and moments of drama. Attention now turns to Interlagos in two weeks’ time, with the Constructor’s Championship still very much hanging in the balance with Mercedes leading with 585 points and Ferrari on 530.

Top Girls Review – ‘uncomfortably straddles the experimental and the domestic’

1

It’s exciting to see an all-female cast. Even though I should be expecting it, given the play’s name, I’m pleasantly surprised as six women fill the room, a dinner table awaiting them. The Pilch is a fun venue to be in: the audience are in on the action, an extension of the dinner party. And Churchill’s writing lends itself to intimacy: characters are constantly interrupting one another, and I feel slightly as though I’ve walked in on a cosy girls’ night. But Top Girls is ultimately a play about high-powered individualism and the cost of female success in a man’s world, telling the story of Marlene (Katie Cook), a Thatcher-loving managing director.

The silent waiters in the first act, Hannah Patient and Aisling Taylor, end up lighting up the show. Patient, as Angie, is impressive, handling the nuances of the character with skill and ability. Equally, Taylor provides a great bit of light relief as a posh, gum-chewing twenty-one year old, faking her way through a job interview. Patient and Taylor feel like grounding presences in a play that wanders strangely between monologues by a ninth century female pope (acted hilariously by Paula Kaanders), a thirteenth century Japanese concubine (Leanne Yau), and banal interactions in a sterile workplace.

The plot loosely revolves around a business that, when performed by Oxford students, almost feels like a deliberate parody of the OXWIB society, full of high-powered, manicured women. Intended to be punchy, the workplace scenes sometimes drag, something that is not helped by having two intervals. Whilst Cook and her cohort (Martha Berkmann, Camilla Dunhill) are compelling, I am sometimes left wondering what the point of it is. The problem is more that they are not likeable enough: I feel no sympathy for Cook’s character, and am unable to empathise with the sacrifices she has had to make for her success. It’s a brand of feminist individualism that does not have quite enough gusto, nor enough comic potential, to be convincing – though I am also left wondering if this is a problem with the writing.

The final act, set between Marlene and her sister Joyce (Eilidh Ross), is a difficult domestic drama, as the tensions between the sisters come out during a drunken night in Scarborough. Here credit must be given to the set designer, Ella Easton: Joyce’s home is impressively detailed, again giving the sense that you are sitting on a sofa opposite the two arguing sisters as they sip brandy. Whilst it is moving – I feel particularly warm towards Ross’s quiet performance – it feels like a whole play in itself, isolated from the rest of the action. I struggle to see the connection between the bizarre dinner party of Act 1, full of women from across history, and this moment of domesticity. Churchill’s play uncomfortably straddles the experimental and the domestic. Adam Radford-Diaper’s adaptation is slick and well-acted, often wonderfully absurd and funny, but ultimately leaves me feeling slightly cold.

A Guide to Black Tie (sort of)

0

Picture the scene. You’ve paid £100 for the privilege of going to a ball, and the night ahead lies at your mercy. Your trousers and shirt are on and the creases are so sharp that they could cut through the jargon of an English Lit finalist’s essay. Having surreptitiously googled ‘black suit belt thingy’ you have discovered the item before you is in fact a ‘cummerbund’, which you say aloud to yourself a few times whilst giggling, before tying it round your waist.

Now it’s time to separate the men from the boys. The bow tie. The piece-de-resistance. Thank god that, according to GQ, the “neckwear is supposed to look somewhat floppy or off-kilter and perfect alignment is not expected or preferred,” because you are utterly incapable of tying one. Never fear – the trusty clip-on tie rises from the second drawer down to greet you like an old friend, and in a matter of seconds is firmly affixed to your collar.

Shoes polished, socks on, and a check of the family tree confirms that Bob is indeed your Uncle. A quick glance into the mirror reveals that you now look like Daniel Craig, Sean Connery, and Roger Moore all rolled into one, and as you leave to join pres you are already smiling at the thought of Jonty and Bonty laughing when you sidle up to the bar to ask for a VK, shaken, not stirred.

But then disaster strikes. Because, as you hit pres, you realise every other bloke there is dressed like you. And suddenly you aren’t James Bond at all. You’re Ron Weasley. Wobbly lib, greasy-haired, Professor-McGonagall-teach-me-how-to-waltz Ron Weasley.

Loathe it or love it, the black tie is a necessary fixture of Oxford’s social scene. This is perhaps unsurprising – a dress code that has connotations of elitism being associated with a university that deals with similar accusations every day is hardly headline news. It can also be something of an inconvenience, what with the inevitable stains, the stiff collars, and the dry cleaning. What even is dry cleaning? What do they even do there?

But let’s hold on a second. Whilst they are over a century old and seemingly inaccessible, the reality of the modern-day tuxedo is that they are now available in the likes of Topman, H&M, ASOS, and many other staple high street shops – something of a far-cry from the Savile Row they might usually be more associated with. And they can perhaps be modernised and tweaked even further to address the establishment vibe the outfit gives off. when Charlie Chaplin wore it in his 1930s slapstick films, or when Ian Fleming decided which hue of velvet his protagonist was going to don in that chapter, did they really have in mind that somewhere, in 2018, Giles and Hubert would be pairing their outfits with denim jackets and air maxes like the hypebeasts they bloody well are?

Herein lies the crucial problem. How does one stand out in a suit being worn by all around you? There’s always the velvet smoking jacket, but that has certain risks attached to it. If a couple of your mates have them too, suddenly your intended chic of sophisticated armchair socialist has been replaced with barbershop quartet, on the cusp of a heartfelt rendition of ‘I Want It That Way’. Not ideal.

Then there’s the option of the dazzlingly white tux, an excellent choice for everyone who wants to look like a waiter from Fight Club. The first rule about white jackets is definitely, definitely, that no one should wear white jackets. So, a simple black number appears to be the top choice.

Of course, there’s always the option of not wearing a jacket at all. You’ve been working out at Pure Gym, you’re well known around college as the brand rep of Huel, why not show off those biceps as much as possible and remove the blazer altogether? Again, it’s a definite possibility, until the inevitable rip occurs, and then you’ll be wishing you had something to cover up the impracticalities of your XXXS shirt. And if the rip doesn’t get you, well my friend, the sweat will. Patches emerging out of nowhere, laughing to themselves as you have to spend the remainder of the DFO gig with your arms clamped by your side. I think not.

The trousers then, surely? Pin stripe is a possibility. Al Capone wore pin stripes. He was a cool guy, right? No. Incorrect. He was a convicted criminal who ended his days in Alcatraz having contracted dementia from undiagnosed syphilis. Pin stripes. Your call.

Your choice of footwear is an absolute deal breaker. Too casual and scruffy, and you look underdressed and out of sorts, too loud and it’ll be even worse. The number one worst thing you can do is wear slacks. Slacks. One of the premier reasons I am doubtful of the existence of a higher religious being is because I refuse to believe any omnipotent, benevolent presence would sanction the creation of slacks. If I wanted to look like an extra in a Year 8 production of Bugsy MaloneI would audition.

And don’t get me started on White Tie. The £200 for a Commemoration ball can just about be scraped together, but having to fork out to loan a full outfit on top of that? And can someone please explain the buttons to me? Why are there two sets of buttons? It’s not like the outfit itself is particularly becoming either. I didn’t want to look like a pregnant penguin. I just wanted to ride the dodgems.

In short, the solution – the only possible solution – is clear for all to see. We must simply all agree to look the same. So I call on you, tuxedo wearers of Oxford, let us unite behind a uniform outfit of tailored black jacket, white shirt and black trousers. I can’t stop you from jazzing up the tie, that’s your prerogative, and if you want to stand out then so be it. But I can at least illustrate the pitfalls of attempting to do so.

Next time you find yourself preing before a 21st or a ball in a room filled with individuals imitating your outfit, take a moment to smile, reflect, and consider what could have been.

Sure, you’re no different from the rest of these people. But at least you aren’t Gary in the corner, who looks like he’s about to go on stage with Suggs and the rest of Madness.