Tuesday 26th August 2025
Blog Page 678

Fantastic Bore And Where To Fail Your Fans

0

As President of HPSoc I jumped at the chance to review a Harry Potter film. Writing this review however has been a battle between objectivity and my love for the franchise. But as much as I wanted to give a glowing review, nostalgia cannot hide the film’s evident flaws. Our story picks up six months after the events of Fantastic Beasts – dark wizard Grindelwald has escaped custody and Dumbledore tasks Newt Scamander with putting a stop to his schemes for wizard domination.

The film primarily suffers from being the second outing in a franchise with another three movies planned. Consequently, it spends more time setting up further sequels than providing us with a satisfying story in this instalment. Considering the amount of information that the film throws at the audience, it feels surprising that some important exposition is lacking. The trailer already made clear that Credence Barebone had somehow survived his apparent death at the end of Fantastic Beasts, and yet the means of his seemingly impossible survival is not revealed.

Overloading us with complicated backstories, whilst missing out on some of the essentials speaks more generally to the plot’s disjointed nature. The film would have gained a lot by spending longer in the editing room as it simply tries to pack too much into one movie. Throughout the film there is indeed a marked preference for plot over character. Although the central plot centres on Credence’s attempts to discover his true identity, he is given little meaningful screen time to make us really root for his success. Throughout the film’s events, he is accompanied by Nagini in human form. Despite the revelation that Voldemort’s snake used to be a woman plagued by a blood curse, for all the hype that this generated she is given a very small role that will leave viewers angry that this reveal had very little significance in the film.

The Crimes of Grindelwald caused a stir long before it hit screens with the casting of Johnny Depp and the decision to refrain from explicit reference to Grindelwald and Dumbledore’s relationship. Johnny Depp may not be how many people envisaged Grindelwald, yet he brought tons of charisma to the role, setting Grindelwald up to be a dangerous villain. As warned, we were not shown Harry Potter’s first gay relationship, but while a simple shot of intertwined fingers aptly conveys Dumbledore’s inner turmoil, it ultimately was only really there to serve the plot.

Visually, the film cannot be faulted. Exquisite costumes, and vibrant depictions of magic renders The Crimes of Grindelwald a feast for the eye, though the final duel could have been more creatively staged than a war between different colours of fire. Newt’s creatures were less of a focus this time, but they still had a suffcient presence to justify the franchise’s title, and were also responsible for a high proportion of the laughs in my screening.

The amount of connections to the main Harry Potter franchise makes The Crimes of Grindelwald a treat for fans of the original series. Familiar family names and characters appear, including a younger version of Albus Dumbledore – big shoes for any actor to fill, but Jude Law comfortably exceeds expectations. This means that the viewer’s enjoyment
is heavily dependent on their familiarity with Harry Potter, as the film relies on the nostalgia it can evoke from viewers.

The film’s twist reveal at the end was both shocking and intriguing. If explained well in subsequent films, it could come close to Vader’s iconic reveal to Luke at the end of Empire Strikes Back. Overall, The Crimes of Grindelwald leaves us with more questions than answers – maybe it’s time for J.K. to relinquish the scriptwriting quill and stick to her novels.

 

Wearing a thong is never consent

0

There are many reasons why a woman may choose to wear a thong. Maybe she finds them really comfy. Maybe they make her feel confident, like she can take on the world. Maybe she doesn’t want a visible panty line. Sometimes us women wear sexy underwear for the benefit of our partner, but most of the time it is for ourselves. The decision to wear a thong certainly does not suggest that someone wants to be raped. However, earlier this month in Ireland, a barrister told a jury to consider the underwear that the 17-year-old girl was wearing when she was allegedly raped by a 27-year-old man. The barrister’s words have caused outrage both in Ireland and around the world.

The court case in question took place in Cork, Ireland. The 17-year-old complainant insisted that she did not give consent to a 27-year-old man with whom she had a sexual encounter in a lane. He insisted that she did give her consent. After cross-examination, the jury ultimately found the man not guilty of rape. It is not the intention of this article to challenge this verdict. I do not know enough about the case or the evidence to do so. What I am taking issue with is the closing statement of the defence attorney, Elizabeth O’Connell. She asked the jury: “Does the evidence rule-out the possibility that [the complainant] was attracted to the defendant and was open to meeting someone and being with someone? You have to look at the way she was dressed. She was wearing a thong with a lace front.” This comment, and the fact that the alleged victim’s underwear was passed around in court as evidence, has caused public indignation.

It is perfectly legal, and unfortunately common, for an alleged victim of rape’s underwear to be passed around in court as evidence. But the only reason for which underwear should be considered in the court case is if it provides some sort of medical evidence, such as DNA which will help the case. Forcing victims to hold up their underwear or to see it passed around is not only humiliating, it is a further violation. In the case in Cork, it is unclear whether the jury was influenced by O’Connell’s closing statement or the display of the complainant’s underwear, but the issue is that there is no law in Ireland which declares which evidence can be used to indicate somebody’s character. Underwear can currently be used; therefore, it must be considered as part of the evidence by the jury. Regardless of the other evidence, a woman’s clothing – whether it be underwear or anything else – never implies consent.

The Irish court case is indicative of a wider culture of victim blaming. In sexual assault cases, the way that the woman was dressed, how much alcohol she had consumed and her actions (such as walking home alone) are often considered. The assumption in this case, as presented by O’Connell, is that the victim was wearing ‘sexy’ underwear, and that therefore she must have wanted sex. A woman’s clothing absolutely, under no circumstances gives consent or should be used against them. Women and girls are constantly pressured in society to appear sexual, but this is then turned against them and used as evidence. A thong does not cause rape. A short dress does not cause rape. Rapists cause rape. To suggest anything else is victim blaming and is part of the reason why sexual assault remains such a large problem and why rape convictions are so low (about 8% in Ireland in 2009 – the last available figures).

Another concerning implication from O’Connell’s words is that if the complainant did choose her underwear because she was looking for sex, she had ‘made her bed’ from the moment she put the underwear on. One of the key concepts of sexual consent is that you can change your mind. A man or a woman may say they want to have sex, but then by the time they get to the action, they may vocalise that they have changed their mind. This is fine, and the consent no longer stands. O’Connell appears to be dismissing this, suggesting that the complainant put her underwear on, wanting sex, and so cannot complain that she later got it. This is completely appalling.

I have focused a lot on defence attorney, O’Connell’s, words, but it is important to remember that she is only a small part of a bigger problem. Reform is needed in Irish courts. There needs to be clear laws defining what evidence can be used in sexual assault cases, ensuring that any evidence used does not victim blame. The words used by lawyers and other authority figures also need to ensure that the focus in these cases is on the actions of the perpetrator rather than the attire or the situation of the victim. There are guidelines in the UK, but these can also be improved upon, as well as encouraging a cultural change in British courts. Protests throughout Ireland and an international Twitter campaign, #ThisIsNotConsent, with women posting pictures of their underwear are calling for such reforms.

The chants of those protesting – “whatever we wear, wherever we go, yes means yes and no means no” – capture the issue of consent. It is not just about this one court case, it is about victim blaming and the dismal rape conviction rate. Change must come to move the courts out of the archaic and patriarchal systems which fail victims of sexual assault.

Restaurant Review: Zheng

Back in 2009, food writer Giles Coren named SoJo as one of the best Chinese restaurants in the country. Just a couple months ago a cockroach was found in a customer’s meal, alongside rat droppings and urine in the kitchen.

Even before this, in 2015, Coren crowned a new restaurant on Walton Street as being “possibly the best authentic Chinese-Malaysian in the country”. This restaurant was Zheng.

Given the demise of SoJo, you can understand my apprehension as I walked through the front door of Zheng. In a place like Oxford, perhaps because of the rapid in and outflow of students, standards can slip worryingly fast. I expected to either be positively blown away, or bitterly disappointed. In reality, I felt neither of those things.

Firstly, it must be noted that the service at Zheng is wonderful. Attentive, polite, and efficient, absolutely no complaints to be had here. However, the atmosphere is odd. Certainly not dead, but certainly not as alive as the other bustling institutions lining up through Jericho.

The mood is lightened somewhat by the extremely eclectic interior. I can guarantee that the designer of Zheng has never done a course in interior design, but that’s a good thing: no one wants to eat a Chinese in Ikea.

Now to the food. My friend, Biz, and I order a set meal which is decently well-priced at £21.50. It starts perfectly well. Biz, who has never had a duck pancake in her life, was impressed not only by the meticulous self-organisation that come with the dish, but also the flavours. Crispy on the outside, tender on the inside – everything that Chinese duck should be. However, it all started to go a little down-hill from there.

The sweet and sour chicken was certainly crispy and the sauce, often sickly sweet, was well balanced. Nevertheless, it lacked a real punch, as did the beef in black bean sauce. The meat was not only a tad undercooked, but swamped by its rather watery counterpart.

It wasn’t that tasty flavours weren’t there; they were just shoved into the background, crying out for attention behind confusing textures and a rather unsightly presentation. Now I know I should not have been expecting Michelin-star-esque daintiness, but, even so…

All in all, not bad. Best Chinese-Malaysian in the country? Certainly not. Either Coren’s standards were considerably low that day, or Zheng might be just be heading the same way as SoJo.

Review: Sweetener by Ariana Grande

0

Favourite Tracks: God is a Woman, Get Well Soon, No Tears Left to Cry, Blazed

Rating: 6/10

In an interview with The FADER magazine prior to the release of Sweetener, Grande’s fourth album, the singer hinted that listeners should expect something different: “I’ve always just been like a shiny, singing, 5-6-7- 8, sexy-dance…sexy thing. But now it’s like, OK… issa bop – but issa message.” The release of Sweetener comes at a somewhat precarious moment for pop music. For a genre synonymous with commercial appeal, it seems increasingly challenging for pop artists to rely on the established formulas which once guaranteed success.

Grande says that her music is now both “bop” and “message”, but she is by no means the first to try and combine the two in recent times. Rihanna’s ANTI and Beyoncé’s Lemonade are both albums which were critically acclaimed for their perceived ‘authenticity’. ANTI was lauded as a more personal, less overtly ‘commercial’ album than Rihanna’s previous work, whilst Lemonade was both political and intimate in its celebration of female strength and resilience. Sweetener can thus be seen as part of this broader sea-change occurring in contemporary pop, in which “message” is just as important as commercial appeal.

Set against this backdrop, whilst Grande’s album is undeniably her strongest work to date, it also falls oddly flat in multiple places. There is a sense that this album is an attempt to broach new musical territory for Grande, and yet the overall result feels more cautious than innovative. A case in point is the album’s third track ‘The Light is Coming’, one of seven to be produced by Pharrell Williams, which features an oddly chant-like refrain as well as a fairly underwhelming verse from frequent collaborator Nicki Minaj.

The song contains a repeated sample of a man shouting, “You wouldn’t let anybody speak for this and instead!” at a town hall meeting concerning healthcare in 2009. As well as becoming increasingly irritating as the song progresses, the reason for its inclusion is difficult to understand; is this an attempt to lend a political edge to a track which is ostensibly about a difficult relationship? If so, the move feels poorly executed, as well as unimaginative given that Pharrell has previously used the sample in the N.E.R.D and Rihanna collaboration ‘Lemon’ as well as ‘Master Race’ by Busta Rhymes.

Another misstep is the forgettable ‘Borderline’ which contains a criminally short guest verse from the imperious Missy Elliott and a background of uninspiring synths and plodding beats. Ironically, Grande sings ‘won’t you give me a bit of your time’, and then allows Elliott only seventeen seconds of airtime, wasting the rapper’s considerable talent.

The album flits between different styles from track to track, from the 70s-influenced groove of ‘Successful’, the trap beats of ‘Everytime’ and ‘Sweetener’, to the R&B of Beyonce-rejected-demo ‘’R.E.M’. By the end of the album Grande has covered an impressive amount of musical ground. The mixture of trap, R&B and pop is admirably ambitious in scope and if occasionally it feels a tad scatter-gun, it is evidence of Grande’s recent musical development as an artist, her willingness to try out new sounds and ideas even if they don’t always come off.

The album’s strongest moments arrive when this readiness to throw caution to the wind is accompanied by the pop hooks and vocal power which have always been the foundations of Grande’s sound. This winning formula is executed most successfully on the album’s most obvious stand-out hit ‘God is a Woman’, which has already become ubiquitous in department stores across the country. The fusion of sexual and religious imagery is not without precedent (Madonna’s ‘Like a Prayer’ anyone?), but the gratifying intricacy of lyrics like “And I can tell that you know I know how I want it” prevents the track from sliding into cliché. The sleek mid-tempo production combines pop and hip-hop to create the perfect space for Grande’s sultry vocals, which scale an impressive range effortlessly, rendering the song as the most polished example of the new sound you feel she’s trying to create. The assertiveness and conceptual inventiveness of ‘God is a Woman’ is something you feel the album could do with more of in its weaker areas, yet that is not to say there aren’t other highlights.

The first single, ‘No Tears Left to Cry’ is a peppy dance-pop track which offers an anthemic solution to tragedy: ‘I’m lovin’, I’m livin’, I’m pickin’ it up’. This and ‘Get Well Soon’ are songs which reach out to the listener and offer a strength and resilience which appear hard-won; the latter song, in particular, seems intended as a tonic to all those who suffer from anxiety and mental health problems. The way in which Grande offers her support (‘I’m with you, I’m with you, I’m with you, just call me’) to her fans is incredibly moving given the context of the Manchester terror attack last year, as is the forty seconds of silence which brings the song’s run-time to 5.22 (the date of the attack).

These moments of warmth and musical fineness have the effect of casting a harsh light on the album’s weaker tracks, exposing where they are lacking in comparison. And yet despite the unevenness, this work constitutes a significant creative progression for Grande – neither “bop” nor “message”, Sweetener is something stranger, occupying a middle-ground between the two. This is not an album which innovates contemporary pop music, but perhaps understandably, Ariana Grande is not too concerned with that right now. Instead, she has made an album which feels like a successful act of healing.

Plush to replace Purple Turtle at Union venue

0

Plush is to replace Purple Turtle at the Oxford Union’s venue at Frewin Court from January 2019.

A spokesperson for the club said in a statement: “The final night at The Jam Factory site will be Monday, 31st December 2018.

“Plush is delighted that the new venue will offer long-term stability in providing an ongoing safe space for the LGBTQ+ community within central Oxford.”

The club is currently based at Park End Street.

It was disclosed in October that the club faced imminent closure after the venue’s owner, Nuffield College, said it was considering redeveloping the site.

Last Saturday was Purple Turtle’s final night at Frewin Court. Over 100 people were seen queuing outside to gain access to the club by 10.45pm. 

The owner of Purple Turtle, Danny Fraifeld, has stressed to Cherwell that Purple Turtle will continue and that they are looking at new venues to house the club in the future.

He said in a statement: “After all it’s never been the building that makes the Turtle, it’s the Turtle that makes the building.”

 

 

Table Manners Review – ‘subtly and successfully updated’

0

Picture this: a homelessness charity cafe with large dinner table in the centre, surrounded by circles of chairs haphazardly arranged. That is the set for Antonia Hansen’s revival of Alan Ayckbourn’s 1973 comedy. One of a trilogy of plays called The Norman Conquests, Table Manners follows the drama of a family over the course of a weekend who loathe yet love each other all at the same time. Hansen’s update aims to bring the women to the fore and throughout the performance makes clear an intentional distinction between the male and female characters. The men are dopey and dim whereas the women are headstrong and opinionated. The update works, and this is mostly thanks to the actors.  

This production boasts impressive performances from all its cast and in particular from Martha Harlan as Annie, Cameron Forbes as Norman and Jed Kelly as Tom. Kelly is ridiculously funny, a master of comic timing and becomes absolutely essential for light relief as the play takes a slightly more serious turn. A likeable and amusing stage presence, the look of constant bewilderment on his face never fails to be funny. He was my favourite part of the play and in all honestly I would pay the ticket price just to see him again.

Harlan and Forbes are also impressive in their roles – Harlan’s acting is so effortlessly believable that she manages to make a character who could be so easily be forgettable totally memorable. Her different relationship with each character is very convincing and this is mostly due to Harlan’s excellent flexibility. There is also some noticeable sexual tension between Annie and Norman which adds a dash of excitement to each scene they are both in. Forbes is utterly charming as the flirty yet misunderstood Norman and you can completely see how the women of the production find him hard to resist. He has hints of dark humour and somehow makes a potentially sleazy character surprisingly sympathetic.

 The other three actors are also impressive, especially Antonia Mappin-Kasirer as Ruth. Occasionally she slips into overacting, but there are some moments of really quality acting – what stood out for me in particular was her speech comparing her husband to an overdue library book. Moments of raw emotion are rare in Table Manners, which makes the times that they do appear even more effective.

My one complaint would be that for the first act and some of the second act I am not sure where the play is going. This becomes clear in the few minutes before said climax, but more variation in emotion, particularly in the first act, would be welcome. Having said that, the penultimate scene of the play – when it arrives – is possibly the standout moment of the show. All six characters on stage at once, combined with both a hilarious argument about where everybody should sit at the table and an unexpectedly violent moment of coup de théâtre makes for a delightful climax. The issue with such an effective penultimate scene is that the finale almost never matches up. Sadly this is the case with Table Manners, as the final scene is too obviously just there to wrap up loose ends. The actors do their best with it but some tweaks in the script and staging of the final moments wouldn’t go amiss.

Hansen and her cast throw themselves into a play which is one of the funniest and most enjoyable student productions I have seen for a while. I certainly hope to see this revived again in the not so distant future.

Uni has ‘systematically failed to listen’ to trans students

1

The University of Oxford has “systematically failed to listen” to the needs of transgender students, leading to a mental health “crisis” in the transgender community at the University, according to the SU’s recently released Trans Report.

The survey used data collected in an online survey conducted in Hilary and Trinity terms 2017-18 with 52 respondents. As transgender people make up just 0.4% of the UK’s population and the median coming out age for trans people is 42, the SU argues that the survey represents a substantial enough proportion of the university’s trans community for the sample to be significant.

The report found that nearly 90% of transgender students have experienced or are currently experiencing mental health issues, compared to just 50% of cisgender students, with 65% saying the University had a “negative” or “very negative” effect on their mental health.

59% of transgender students have self-harmed or considered suicide in the past, and were three times more likely to consider suicide than cisgender students and over five times more likely to experience an eating disorder.

Stress and anxiety were the most common mental health issues facing the University’s transgender population, affecting over 80% of students (compared to 75% of the UK’s transgender population), followed by depression, which 75% of transgender students reported to experience or have experienced (slightly lower than the 80% of the national transgender population).

The report argued that “these figures are evidence of a mental health crisis in the transgender community at the University of Oxford, and that this crisis must be addressed urgently.”

The same report also found that 63% of students said that they have experienced transphobia or discrimination since coming to Oxford, with 83% having faced discrimination from their fellow students, 29% from academic staff.

Although 83% of transphobic incidents involved fellow students, one respondent said that cisgender students are “often unaware of their transphobia”, whilst another argued these incidents “tend to be from a lack of knowledge or unwillingness to understand.”

Survivors of transphobic incidents were 50% more likely to have experienced mental health problems, twice as likely to self-harm or contemplate suicide, and over 250% more likely experience problems with drug or alcohol abuse. Less than 40% of respondents said that they felt “comfortable” or “very comfortable” reporting transphobic incidents, and only 21% knew the proper process for reporting them. Meanwhile, only 42% of transgender students surveyed had considered going to “staff-led” welfare services, and most felt more comfortable with mental health efforts led by fellow transgender students.

The report also cast light on the failings of university-wide welfare schemes, with just 55% of students “satisfied” with the University counselling system, and only 50% satisfied with the LGBTQ+ Society’s welfare efforts. The report proposed a number of reforms to tackle the fact that the University “is not doing enough” to provide transgender students with “the welfare support they need to cope with issues both related and unrelated to their trans identity”.

These reforms included the creation of a centralised “Trans Fund”, improved training for counsellors about the problems transgender students face, and greater provisions to educate incoming students on trans issues.

The co-chair of the SU’s LGBTQ+ Campaign and principal author of the report, Aaron Hughes, told Cherwell: “It’s important to recognise that while student-led welfare initiatives both in and out of college have their shortcomings, they are a vital and tireless source of support for transstudents at the University of Oxford.

“Unlike welfare staff, these students are neither trained nor paid to provide such support. Nonetheless, they do so in order to address a need which is clearly not being met by college, faculty and University welfare provisions.”

A spokesperson for the LGBTQ+ Society told Cherwell: “The LGBTQ+ Society is committed to constantly working to improve the social and welfare support we provide; however, we would like to stress that our trans reps already work tirelessly to create safe spaces both within the society, and the wider university.

“The findings of this report indicate that disproportionate responsibility falls on students to offer support to their peers. Instead of criticising the student-led welfare, which is consistently outperforming trained professionals, we should be calling on the university to stop sweeping these issues under the rug, to take the complaints of trans students seriously, and to improve its services.”

The University has been contacted for comment.

Major Oxford donors face imminent criminal investigation

0

One of Oxford University’s largest donors are facing mass litigation and probable criminal investigations into their role in the ongoing American opioid crisis.

Suffolk County of Long Island, New York, sued the Sackler family last month over the number of overdose deaths and painkiller addictions in the community. The legal action is expected to trigger further cases against the family across the US.

The Sacklers are the 20th richest family in America at an estimated collective worth of $14 billion. The majority of their fortune comes from their pharmaceutical company, Purdue Pharma, which is responsible for the making and prescribing of prescription painkiller and narcotic OxyContin.

Purdue Pharma is currently facing legal action from at least 30 states in state court, with the first trial expected to be held next spring.

OxyContin is a highly addictive opioid, and its production and distribution is widely regarded as partly responsible for the ongoing opioid epidemic in the US, which is estimated to kill almost 200 people every day.

Prosecutors in Connecticut and New York are also understood to be debating bringing criminal fraud and racketeering charges against the family over the alleged manner in which the drug has been dangerously overprescribed and deceptively marketed to doctors, with Purdue Pharma reportedly telling doctors that the drug had minimal addictive effects.

In 2006, the company pled guilty in federal court to marketing OxyContin with “the intent to defraud or mislead.”

Since 1991, Oxford has received over £11 million in donations from the Sackler family and their trusts.

The Sacklers’ donations have contributed towards building the Bodleian Sackler Library and funding the Sackler Keeper of Antiquities at the Ashmolean. Donations from the Sacklers also make up part of the museum’s endowment.

The family’s contributions have also supported a University Lecturer and a Teaching Fellowship in Earth Sciences, as well as Paediatric and neuroscience projects. Oxford academics additionally participate in partnerships established by the family, including the Raymond and Beverly Sackler US-UK Scientific Forum.

When contacted for comment, a University spokesperson refused to comment on specific cases, though told Cherwell: “All major prospective donors to the University of Oxford are carefully considered by the University’s Committee to Review Donations under our guidelines for acceptance.

“The University monitors significant developments in the public domain and may reconsider a donor in the light of new information.”

Earlier this year, the University confirmed that they would continue receiving donations from the family despite their manufacturing of the opioid, telling Cherwell: “At present, there is no intention for the Committee to reconsider the Sackler family and trusts.”

The New York lawyer representing Suffolk County called the Sacklers “essentially a crime family … drug dealers in nice suits and dresses.”

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that over 72,000 Americans died of drug overdoses in 2016 – a 10% increase on the year before, which the organisation believes was driven by the ongoing opioid crisis. Opioid addiction kills more Americans than gun violence every year.

The Sackler family have been contacted for comment.

This girl can, and she will

0

The ‘This Girl Can’ campaign was launched by sport England in 2015, with the goal of promoting women’s involvement in sport. Since then, the initiative has been incredibly successful and is credited with inspiring nearly 150,000 more women to take part in sport within nine months of its launch. Additionally, the gender gap in sport closed in England by half a million people after two years of the campaign.

The ‘This Girl Can’ website continues to offer inspiring and interesting stories from a variety of women taking part in sport and a multitude of suggestions for how others can get involved. This week Oxford is supporting the campaign as it does each year through the BUCS ‘This Girl Can week’, with a series of events and activities being put on for women to try new sports and find out more.

The chief success of the campaign to me is its focus on a large proportion of women who feel uncomfortable with exercising due to feeling intimidated, being worried about their appearance and getting sweaty or are insecure about their ability or body type. Anxieties over exercising and physical insecurities hold back so many women from exercising, and it is was refreshing to see the campaign take on more issues such as beginning exercise again after pregnancy or whilst having a busy job, partaking in sport at any age, exercising in your own home or on a budget. The campaign also offered up a wide range of activities from dancing to walking or skateboarding.

The campaign is now also focusing on building up confidence through sport and the mental health benefits of exercising, an issue which has long been overshadowed with women often working both in the work place and at home as carers or parents and having to deal with high levels of stress.

As someone who has been running competitively since I was eight years old, played in nearly every sports team available at primary school and then started to swim for my club before school in secondary, I consider myself a girl who loves sport. Running and exercise is something which contributes to my happiness, physical health, and social life. I am very excited by the effect of this campaign, its increasing diversity and the upward trajectory of women in sport, but I also feel that there are significant barriers which we need to overcome and problems which need to be illuminated.

Sport can give women a sense of self-worth beyond achievements in academic or creative realms. By being a winner, an important participant or simply feel strong in their own bodies, women can break down traditional gender roles and hierarchies. However, girls are often pushed to breaking point, with competition becoming too intense and creating paralysing fears or a desire to strive for perfection which can lead to mental health problems and eating disorders. I have seen far too many girls in sports teams suffer from such issues. We need to build up support networks and a dialogue around women’s sport to reduce the risk of problems such as dealing with stress, failure and body insecurities, and effective and healthy nutrition.

In speaking to some Oxford university students about issues which they have experienced in sport it became apparent to me how broad ranging this problem is. A PPE student told me that she feels that there is a point in our adolescence in which girls can no longer just play sport for fun and only have an excuse to continue if they are very good or made the team, with PE lessons often becoming sharply divided between sports stars and a rising number of girls sitting out.

Another expressed that she felt many girls don’t want to join sports like judo, which she enjoys, due to fears of getting too bulky or being intimidated by male participants. She said that for her this fear also extends to the gym where the weights section feels like a ‘no-go zone’ as a masculine domain. In order to break down these fears in women’s sport, we need to bring sport into the wider debate around gender and try to reduce forms of ‘lad culture’ or predatory behaviour that put off women.

A second year English student told me of her experiences, “I shut myself off from sporting opportunities and associated sport with a type of person I distinctly was not. It has taken me years to learn that the benefits of sport, being part of a team, committing to exercising frequently and pushing yourself outside your comfort zone, are not exclusive to a particular elite group.

“You are allowed to commit to things you are bad at; and by committing to them you get better. This has pushed me to join both touch rugby and rowing at university. I am constantly surprised by the progression you make when you consider yourself to be valid, no matter where you start from.” It is this fear, which is tied into both physical appearance and not appearing ‘good enough’ at sport which can shroud exercise in negativity for so many women and which will take systematic changes to undo.

Men’s sports fixtures continue to dominate our screens and our newspapers. Women’s sport won’t be taken as seriously as men’s sports, unless radical change is implemented. We know from the dramatic impact of the 2012 Olympics on sports participation in Britain that representation matters and seeing a woman performing at the highest level can draw girls into sports. If we are committed to equality then we need to extend this commitment to the field of sport.

Celebrations set to close after 25 years

1

The Turl Street shop Celebrations is set to close after over 25 years of trading.

The fancy-dress shop was opened in 1992, and has since proved popular with students celebrating end-of-year exams and looking for interesting bop outfits. However, it is due to close on 30th November due to losing business to competitors.

Clare Denton, who runs the shop, has noted the effect that the redevelopment of the Westgate Centre has had. She said: “It’s a heartbreaking decision but we really don’t have any choice because our footfall has reduced significantly since the Westgate Centre reopened.

“I don’t want to close but I have no choice without getting into lots of debt. A report came out recently saying footfall has gone up 8.9 per cent in the past year but I don’t think
that is throughout the city centre.

“People are parking at the Westgate, shopping at the Westgate and then driving home – they are not bothering to venture out into other parts of the city.”

Celebrations is located on premises owned by Lincoln College, whose high rents have also been a factor in the decision to close the shop, according to Mrs Denton.

Mrs Denton added that Celebrations was the last independent joke shop in Oxford city centre, and did not have any plans to trade online.

She said: “I do want to thank customers for their loyalty and support over the years and for their sympathy and kindness.”