Friday 18th July 2025
Blog Page 716

Campaigners to protest Trump’s Oxford visit

1

Protestors have pledged to protest Donald Trump’s planned visit to Blenheim Palace, with Oxford Stand Up To Racism calling for people to demonstrate against the British government “rolling out the red carpet” for the controversial US president.

Oxford Labour Muslim Network has also condemned the potential presidential visit, and Oxford and West Abingdon MP Layla Moran has said she will join protests against the president’s visit.

The reaction from locals has been more mixed. One local publican offered the president a free drink if he stops by his pub, whilst Oxford City Councillor Tom Hayes demanded that the Thames Valley Police and Crime Commissioner “pull on every lever at [his] disposal” to prevent Trump’s visit.

Hayes argues that the president’s views are “alien to the majority if not all of Thames Valley” and that they will stir up support for the far-right in the area, endangering the safety of local residents. Hayes furthermore articulated his “concerns about the prospect of a hardcore band of far-right supports converging on communities within the Thames Valley.”

The councillor added: “The birthplace of Winston Churchill – the man who defended Britain and the world against fascism – shouldn’t be rolling out the red carpet for fascism.”

Oxford Stand Up To Racism have similarly accused the US leader of spreading the “politics of hate” and “incit[ing] racism and division”.

A spokesman for Oxford Labour Muslim Network said: “Donald Trump is not welcome in Oxfordshire and not welcome in our country. Not now, not ever.”

The group “call[s] on the good people of Oxford and Oxfordshire to stand in solidarity with us, Oxfordshire’s Muslim communities.”

A poll of the readers of the Oxford Times found that 74% were opposed to Trump’s visit, while just 26% were in support.

The planned three-day presidential visit is set to take place in July, with President Trump due to meet the Queen on the 13th, an event expected to be met with significant protests. Trump is due to dine at Blenheim Palace on the 12th, the second day of Trump’s first official visit to the UK since his election in 2016. This will be followed by a meeting with Theresa May at the Prime Minister’s country retreat in Buckinghamshire, Chequers.

Blenheim Palace has yet to confirm the visit.

UCU to vote on second set of strikes

0

The University and Colleges Union (UCU) is to hold a ballot to determine whether university staff should return to the picket lines.

The ballot follows the University and College Employers Association’s (UCEA) final offer of a 2-2.8% pay rise for university staff. The offer falls significantly short of UCU’s 7.5% pay claim. UCU says that real-terms pay has been devalued by 21% since 2010.

In initial consultations, 82% of union members said they would vote to reject the offer while 65% were in support of industrial action against low pay. This vote recorded a turnout of 47.7%.

In fighting low pay, the UCU also seeks to tackle casualisation of university staff contracts, the insufficient compensation for hours worked, the low living wage and the gender pay gap. In Oxford, the gender pay gap was reported to be 13.7% in March 2018.

Sally Hunt, UCU general secretary said: ‘The employers’ below-inflation pay offer does nothing to address years of decline in the value of higher education pay so we now have little option but to ballot for strike action.

‘Universities would do well to listen to their students and make investment in staff a top priority. That means a decent pay offer and concrete commitments to tackle problems with gender pay and insecure employment.’

The ballot will be open from August to October 2018.

Oxford UCU has not responded to a request for comment.

 

Cellar faces threat of closure after fire safety concerns

0

The Cellar’s future is again under threat after authorities ruled its fire escape is too narrow for the venue’s current capacity.

Oxfordshire County Council has ordered the venue to reduce its maximum capacity from 150 people to 60, as its 70cm fire escape is 30cm too narrow.

The club’s management have said that one events promoter has already pulled out from future work due to the impact of capacity reduction on the club’s viability as a live music venue.

The news comes just one year after The Cellar fought off plans to redevelop the site into a storage basement. The current capacity was agreed in the 1970s and has remained unchanged ever since.

Oxfordshire County Council’s Fire and Rescue Service Fire Protection and Business Safety Manager, Dave Bray, noted that the venue’s “means of escape from the basement…was found not adequate for 150 people.”

The order reducing the number of possible attendees will remain in place “until the alternate escape route is improved,” Bray added.

The owner of The Cellar, Tim Hopkins, told The Oxford Mail that he was “shocked and frustrated” by the Council’s decision. The club takes “health and safety very seriously” but noted that it would now cost “tens of thousands of pounds” to upgrade the venues fire escapes to maintain the venue’s current capacity.

Hopkins suggested that one solution may be for Cellar to expand into the premises of the Lush shop above the basement venue, which has now moved into Westgate Centre. The owners of those premises have said that “no proposals” had been received for Hopkins’ possible plans.

Mr Hopkins told the The Oxford Mail that with staffing numbers considered, only approximately 50 tickets could be sold per event. As a consequence, one promoter has now pulled out.

Hopkins said: “There’s a lot of history and it’s been a stepping stone for a lot of bands. There is already a shortage of venues…to close a place of this size would leave a massive gap.”

“It’s used by breakthrough bands, students, different sections of the community and for fundraisers. But once it’s gone, it’s gone,” Hopkins added.

The Cellar has been open for at least 45 years. Hopkins notes it is “one of the oldest gig venues in Europe.” It has previously hosted breakthrough bands like Foals and Stornoway, as well as iconic names like Mumford and Sons and The National.

Last year, the property’s owners, The St. Michael’s and All Saints charities, sought to redevelop the basement. This led to a petition to prevent the venue’s closure, signed by over 13,600 people.

Nightshift Magazine have claimed that, ultimately, it “would be handy” for neighbouring property developers “if the pesky music people cleared off.”

Oxford student rents second highest in the UK

0

Oxford is the eighth most expensive city to live in the world and second highest in the UK, according to new figures.

Statistics released by student accommodation marketplace Student.com show the average weekly student rent in Oxford to be $271 – the equivalent of £206.

This makes Oxford the second most expensive student city in Britain after London, and £11 more expensive than the £195 paid by Cambridge students.

The figures, published in the Cities in Focus: 2018 Global Student Accommodation Indicator report, were based off a representative sample size of more than 12,000 students who booked accommodation around the world via Student.com between 1 November 2016 and 31 October 2017.

An Oxford University spokesperson told Cherwell: “The high cost of renting in Oxford is very concerning because it makes it difficult for staff at the University and other employers to afford to live near to where they work. This does make it harder to attract academic and professional staff to work here.

“The university and colleges have made it a priority to build new accommodation for hundreds of students in the past few years, which eases the burden on Oxford’s rental market.”

As well as showing average rates by institution, the report also gave a national league table which suggested that the UK is the second most expensive country for students to live.

Weekly rents are £165 on average across the country, compared to the £155 per week paid by students in America.

Students in Australia reportedly spend the most on their weekly rent, splashing £194 on average.

Katy Perry visits Oxford

0

Katy Perry took a break from her Witness world tour to visit Oxford University last weekend.

The American singer travelled from London, where she had been performing at the O2 arena, to tour around the university’s student halls, libraries, and cathedrals.

She appeared particularly impressed by Oxford’s collection of older books, sharing videos of herself looking over a 431 year old first edition of Isaac Newton’s Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica and a bible from 1578.

At Christ Church Cathedral she listened to resident musician Myles on the pipe organ. She also met with the Principal of Harris Manchester, Sir Ralph Waller, and posed in a photo with him as well as with various students.

She also attended the Oxford Encaenia garden party, mixing with this year’s honorary degree recipients such as Mary Beard and Martin Scorsese.

Perry shared her trip with her 70 million followers on Instagram.

In one post, she shared a photo of a stained glass window saying ‘Courage’ and captioned it: “the ability to do something that frightens one”.

Perry had previously declared her love for British culture, saying she “falls in love with the English very easily” and has joked about wanting to have a “pseudo fake [British] accent like Madonna”.

Her current boyfriend, Orlando Bloom, as well as her ex-husband, Russell Brand, are both British.

Trump to visit Oxford

14

Donald Trump is scheduled to visit Oxfordshire during his upcoming tour of Britain, according to national reports.

His three-day visit to the UK is “likely” to include a meal at Winston Churchill’s birthplace, Blenheim Palace, on the 12th of July.

Trump’s advisers are expected to visit the UK within the next few weeks to finalise the itinerary of the controversial trip.

The visit will be the first the president has made to the UK since his election of to office in November 2016. The tour will not be afforded the full ceremony of an official state visit.

Due to the large anti-Trump protest scheduled to take place in London during the visit, the president’s time in the capital will be limited.

53,000 people are expected to attend the protest against the visit.

According to reports, 10,000 police officers will be relied upon to protect the president from any protests or potential terror attacks. 40 police cars and motorbike outriders will also be available for whenever Trump travels by road.

A warm reception cannot be guaranteed in Oxfordshire either. Protesters quickly began to campaign against Trump’s visit to the county, soon after its likelihood was reported.

Oxford West and Abingdon MP, Layla Moran, has pledged to relocate her anti-Trump protest from central London to Blenheim Palace in response to the the rumours.

Trisha Greenhalgh, a leading academic in medicine at the University of Oxford, informed her 36,000 Twitter followers of the proposed date of the visit, telling them “Pink hats are needed folks” before offering one of said hats to MP Layla Moran.

The reference to “pink hats” in Greenhalgh’s tweet alludes to the “Pussyhats”, a symbol of anti-Trumpism and feminist solidarity. These hats were originally worn by protesters in the Women’s Marches held in January of last year, partly in response to Trump’s election.

Following his meal at Blenheim Palace, the president to due to visit Theresa May at her Buckinghamshire country retreat, The Chequers, and then to travel to meet the Queen at Windsor Palace.

On the final day of the president’s “best of British” tour, Trump is also scheduled to visit his Turnberry golf course in Scotland.

Following a police meeting and crime panel held last Friday, Anthony Stansfeld, Thames Valley police and crime commissioner, stated that he had not yet received detailed information regarding Trump’s visit.  

Stansfeld also explained that more information regarding the Presidential visit would soon be shared with the public.

 

Circus life is no life for animals

3

This week University Parks hosts Gifford’s Circus, one of the few major circuses still touring the United Kingdom. This once loved form of travelling entertainment has been in steep decline since the 1960s, which some claim is down to the disappearance of arguably its most quintessential performers: animals.

While this circus boasts of “gypsy violinists, tight rope walkers, trapeze artists and opera singers”, further down the billboard are some less talkative members of the company, including the horses, dogs and chickens.

The Gifford’s website goes to great lengths to emphasise their commitment to the welfare of their performing animals, with an entire subsection devoted to explaining their ethical treatment of the acts that travel with the circus and perform across the country. Spanning the length of the page, there’s a banner reading: “A life without horses is no life for the circus”. However, a more accurate slogan might read: “A life in the circus is no life for a horse”.

For as long as there have been circuses, animals have performed at them. The West became enthralled with the lion tamers that travelled with Gibson & Co in 1871 and, since then, we have fallen for the training and exhibition of exotic animals. Even in Oxford, the curiosity surrounding wider circus and carnival culture remains apparent to this day, with St. John’s College’s Cirque Nouveau Commemoration Ball achieving great success last year. Circuses have always been associated with dynamism, charisma, and spectacle, and central to this image has been the use of exotic animals.

In 2008, however, our consciences caught up with us. A study by the Dutch Ministry of Agriculture, Nature, and Food Quality revealed 71% of all performing circus animals exhibited medical problems. Among these it was exotic animals that received the poorest treatment, with lions spending an average of 98% of their working lives indoors and tigers having an average enclosure space of 5m². For those less interested in animal welfare, the 123 lion attacks at circuses since 1990 might suggest that these shows are not exactly ethical in regard to their audiences either.

In fairness to Giffords, none of its acts are exotic or endangered species, but rather farmyard and domesticated animals. Only two UK circuses still have wild animal performances, and the UK Government is set to ban them entirely by 2020. Public opinion has shifted massively in favour of such bans, although non-exotic animal performances like those at Giffords still remain widely popular. Many circuses believe these acts are central to their success and that horses especially are an intrinsic part of traditional British circus culture.

The debate as to whether these animals should still perform appears to be far more complex. Animal trainers will, of course, tell you that their animals love to perform. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), on the other hand, have very different ideas on the issue, and attempt to organise protests at all circuses with performing animals. Moreover, given that Gifford’s has only been touring for eighteen years, the argument that they are passing on traditional talents seems a bit thin.

More widely however, the industry does appear to be moving in the right direction. James Hamid from Shrine Circuses has expressed hope that animal acts will soon altogether be a thing of the past. The Chinese State Circus is one of the most revered circuses in Europe and frequently sells out without the need for any performing animals.

Let’s hope soon both circus and spectator will realise that these acts aren’t necessary for a successful performance. We should be satisfied with what humans can achieve on their own, without needing to train other species to perform for us also.

Oxbridge collude on responses to UUK survey

0

Oxford and Cambridge universities collaborated on their responses to a 2017 Universities UK (UUK) survey as a way of safeguarding their own financial interests, leaked documents suggest.

The UUK survey of employers was to ascertain universities’ positions regarding changes to the academics’ pension scheme, the Universities’ Superannuation Scheme (USS).

Leaked minutes, reported by Cambridge student newspaper Varsity, revealed that Cambridge’s Finance Committee requested that the university’s Pensions Working Group “formulate a robust response acting as far as possible with Cambridge Colleges and the University of Oxford to ensure consistency to give weight to the responses”.

Such collusions were found to be typical in Oxbridge responses to USS consultations. Minutes from 2014 show that Cambridge senior officials “discussed their responses” to the 2014 USS valuation “with their opposite numbers at the University of Oxford so that these could be co-ordinated.”

Cambridge officials also met with counterparts at LSE and Edinburgh at the time, while those from Oxford also met with the University of Manchester and Imperial College.

In their responses to the September 2017 consultation, both universities suggested that USS take “less risk” in its investments. The USS currently has a ‘last-man-standing scheme’ whereby institutions take on responsibility not only for the pension deficit on behalf of their own staff, but of the entire sector, leaving wealthier institutions liable to compensate when other universities fail to deliver their share.

Oxford’s response to the UUK September survey read “the level of risk being proposed is not appropriate for all institutions and allowing weaker institutions to rely on the strength of other employers”. A meeting between Oxford and Cambridge in 2017 also described Cambridge’s “growing realisation and frustration” that “financially weaker Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) were relying on the balance sheets of stronger HEIs.”

Only 26% of other HEIs registered opposition to the last-man-standing arrangement in contrast to 73% of Oxbridge institutions.

Varsity suggested that Cambridge’s criticism of the current USS system could be used as an incentive to pull out of the scheme altogether, which they described as “a betrayal of the higher education sector.” However, the £2.5bn cost of the withdrawal made such a step currently “unfeasible”.

Such co-ordination of responses also extended to colleges. A leaked email from the chair of the pensions sub-committee, Simon Summers, showed that a “suggested response” to colleges had been disseminated.

As previously reported by Cherwell, such collusion between the central University and colleges had also occurred in Oxford. Hertford and Pembroke were colleges that initially followed the university line in the call for “less risk”. The latter’s response to the survey had immediately noticeable similarities to that of the University.

Alongside seeking to make survey responses uniform, central senior officials also did not consult individual colleges and academics properly on their views. Seven out of the eight colleges that came forward to support the “less risk” line in Cambridge had their responses submitted by bursars without seeking the advice of their respective governing bodies.

Oxford University did not reply to Cherwell’s request for comment.

Somerville all-women panel highlights plight of female refugees

0

Somerville College hosted an all-women panel on World Refugee Day this week to discuss the unique issues faced by female refugees living in UK.

The all-women panel discussed issues relating to legal rights, social prejudice, and domestic and sexual violence. It is part of a series of panels aiming to give women a greater platform.

The “Women’s Worlds at a Crossroads” discussion was chaired by Somerville’s Principal Baroness Jan Royall.

Speakers included Catherine Briddick, of Oxford University’s Refugee Studies Centre, as well as Oxford councillor Shaista Aziz.

St. John’s Orchestra performed music at the event, as part of their Displaced Voices Project.

This is the second all-female panel that Somerville has planned to host this term. A panel entitled “Democracy Delivers: Women in Politics” was scheduled for the 25th May to celebrate the centenary of female suffrage and encourage more women to enter politics.

The panel was set to include both Oxford East Labour MP, Anneliese Dodds, and the Liberal Democrat Layla Moran MP, who represents Oxford West and Abingdon. Unforeseen circumstances led to cancellation of the event.

Founded as Somerville Hall in 1879, previous Principal Alice Prochaska has spoken of the college’s ethos to “include the excluded”.

Somerville remains the only Oxford college to have had only female Principals, with this week’s panel marking the end of Royall’s first year as Principal.

Oxford men seal emphatic victory at Lord’s

1

Oxford University 223-5 (Hughes 132*) beat Cambridge University 222-7 (Chohan 77, Rogers 2-17) by 5 wickets

It wasn’t until what would turn out to be the final over that you started to realise how easy this had become for him; how different the cut strip he was playing on was seemed to be from the one that had sent his team-mates’ off-stumps cartwheeling and limited Cambridge to 222.

Kartik Suresh stood atop his mark like he had done for his previous nine overs. But this time, when he bowled – wherever he bowled – Matty Hughes simply stood and picked it off to wherever in the ground he fancied. Six runs needed for a sixth consecutive Varsity triumph at Lord’s. Yeah, why not: lofted with a nonchalant flick into the stands. The first 112 runs in this magnificently crafted innings had come at the same lick, always run a ball or thereabouts, but the next 20 came in the space of five balls. Cambridge had become emboldened by a sense they were suddenly in the game and then, with a flick of the switch, they weren’t again.

After winning the toss and deciding to put a total on the board, 222 was probably not too far beyond the realms of captain Darshan Chohan’s early expectations. Passing a total Oxford had posted in a format thirty overs shorter just three weeks ago in the 50th over of the innings doesn’t scream confidence, but then 213 was more than enough for Durham to claw the MCCU Championship Match from perennial victors Loughborough on the exact same deck here on Wednesday.

Samuel Turner feathered behind early and Tom Colverd was enticed into a booming drive that ended in the hands of Jamie Gnodde at second slip, but the wickets were blemishes in an otherwise bright start and Chohan visibly took the game by the scruff, racing along at an imperious strike-rate; daring the Oxford attack to provide him with the width that his game feeds on so lavishly. Through 20 overs, 90-2 seemed bountiful.

It was here that a lack of gears became cruelly exposed. Suddenly every drive was hitting the cover fielder, every nurdle into the leg-side cut-off by the scampering midwicket, every attempt at defusing the crushing scoring pressure faulty in some way.

The following 21 overs were bowled exclusively by Oxford’s three-pronged spin attack of Jamie Gnodde, Jack Rogers, and Hughes – this year, unlike last, a premeditated plan – and were exclusively Oxford’s in outcome. Rogers produced a jaffa to rid of Murty: extracting some rare bite from the surface and, in the umpire’s view, some bat too; Ali Dewhurst played all around one from Gnodde lbw, and all the while Chohan’s supreme start was being eaten away as he backpedalled in absence of a telling partnership, eventually swinging across the line in anger for a Frankenstein-sort of 77 – a series of crunching cuts and pulls but served up with a lingering sense that it was not quite what it could’ve been.

And so step forward Matty Hughes, the distilled image of what it looks like when, just for once, it does all just fit together right. 132 not out off 109 balls, chasing down 223 with just over ten overs to spare, helmet and bat aloft, basked in sunshine in the middle of the most venerable cricket venue in the country.

First slip stood there in disbelief, his light blue cap positioned so to shield his emotion from play. Hughes was on 95, and he’d just got a whole lot of willow on the delivery from Tom Balderson, diverting it, just as he had done with his very first ball of the innings, through the region of first slip. The other twenty boundaries Hughes hit were impeccable in timing and placement – at one time he sauntered down the pitch after unfurling a one-knee cover drive and watched as cover dived to his right, extra cover to his left, and the sweeper chased aimlessly after the racing ball only to see it ripple the boundary rope anyway – but none will have punctured so deep as the flicker of victory that existed for that moment.

At times – not pushing the first run hard, lacking real zest in the field, throwing to the wrong end, that slip catch – Cambridge only had themselves to blame; for the rest of the duration, they really were reduced to audience of a masterclass.

Wickets continually fell at the other end: a fiery Jan Cross-Zamirski bowled through a rare 10 over opening spell with hitherto absent bounce that continually troubled, picking up Dan Escott and taking home Alex Rackow’s off-stump, whilst Gnodde also succumbed bowled, and Rogers was stumped off a wide delivery from Nick Winder by some tidy work behind. Whilst comparatively Chohan had dropped anchor, Hughes forged on relentlessly, at times doing the scoring of two batsman, and certainly the running: picking up the first three of the day.

Matthew Naylor arrived with the game in the balance at 113-4 after 20 overs. Runs weren’t going to be an issue, wickets on the other hand were now at a premium and Naylor played a key hand hoovering up deliveries from Cambridge’s four frontline bowlers and providing captain Chohan with a serious logistical issue of how to hide away the remaining ten overs. When Tom Colverd appeared as the solution, Naylor drove his first ball for four and the duo ensured he was not allowed to settle into any real rhythm.

With Hughes sitting on 99, Cambridge tightened the screw – and the entire ring-field – to eliminate the easy single. Hughes simply rocked back and slapped Suresh aerially to bring up his milestone. Naylor would be trapped lbw just two deliveries later to temper the celebrations, but they were to continue emphatically upon the return of Suresh, and surely will long into the night…