Monday 6th October 2025
Blog Page 771

Oxford beats Cambridge for data security

1

Oxford University’s quality of data protection is far better than Cambridge’s, according to a leading cybersecurity firm.

RepKnight searched the dark web – a seedy but massive back-alley to the normal internet – and found more than twice as many stolen Cambridge email addresses as Oxford email addresses.

As part of their campaign to raise awareness of hacked credentials, the firm scoured the dark web for stolen Oxbridge email addresses using their monitoring tool Breach Alert. They found around 400,000 stolen addresses with the cam.ac.uk domain, and less than half that number with the ox.ac.uk domain.

The addresses were found across numerous dark web sites that serve as warehouses for stolen information. Collectively, those warehouses store “more than five billion stolen, leaked or hacked credentials.”

Though the term “credentials” might suggest passwords or security answers, email addresses alone could be turned against users and institutions. RepKnight warns of how hackers use stolen university emails, including doing anything from conducting phishing scams to using university systems as proxies to conduct illegal operations.

Patrick Martin, the firm’s cybersecurity analyst, said: “It is often assumed that cybercriminals are primarily targeting commercial businesses. However, it’s not hard to see why the confidential data stored at universities might be a valuable commodity for criminals, given the links those institutions have to government agencies, supra-national organisations like the EU, and the private sector.

“Like most industries, universities are working hard to improve their cyber security capabilities. But the best network security often can’t defend against someone logging in using a stolen username and password. The vast majority of the credentials we see on the Dark Web are from third-party breaches, where an email address had been used on a site like LinkedIn or Dropbox, and that site was subsequently compromised – often including the user’s password.”

The findings come after Christopher Wylie’s revelations regarding his former employer Cambridge Analytica’s data gathering practices. Andrew Nix, CEO of the British Big Data firm, bragged to an undercover reporter of swinging elections using prostitutes and sting operations, among other underhanded methods.

Facebook employees have also come forward accusing Cambridge Analytica of mining users’ data to influence their vote.

Sandy Parakilas, former platform operations manager at Facebook, told the Guardian that hundreds of millions of Facebook users could also be targeted by other companies using the same methods as Cambridge Analytica.

Preview: Oxford favourites ahead of Varsity double-header

0

Oxford will go into Sunday’s Varsity football matches as slight favourites as they aim for a double victory for the third consecutive year.

The fixtures, which will be played at Barnet’s North London home, The Hive, are being played as a double-header for just the second time, even though the Varsity Match is widely believed to be the oldest regular fixture in world football.

They will also mark a first in Oxbridge sporting history: as Cherwell revealed in January, this is the first time in a major sport that the women’s fixture has formed the second half of a double-header.

OUAFC and OUWAFC told Cherwell: “The decision to play the women’s game second was a joint decision with all four teams agreeing: alternating the order seemed the obviously fair way to run the event.”

After underwhelming ticket sales last year, the club is understood to be optimistic about Sunday’s attendance, especially with the fixture returning to Boat Race weekend.

Around 1000 tickets have been sold so far, and they are still available here.

Men’s Preview
Kick-off: 2pm

Oxford celebrate the opening goal in last year’s Varsity [David Bauckham/Centre Circle Publishing]

Form

Oxford finished third in this year’s Bucs Midlands 1A, two points off winners Cambridge. The Dark Blues made a strong start to the season, and were top of the league at the end of Michaelmas, but dropped points against the bottom two – Warwick and Oxford Brookes – damaged their title chances.

A postponement to the original fixture meant that the final two games of the season would be against Cambridge, and Oxford knew that defeat was not an option.

But, unfortunately, a 1-0 loss in the away leg meant that the Light Blues sealed the title with a game to spare.

However, a 2-0 victory in the home fixture against the same opposition means that Oxford go into Varsity with the upper hand; and with last year’s hero Dom Thelen scoring twice and getting sent off in that game, it is clear that the Dark Blues are up for a fight.

Women’s Preview
Kick-off: 5pm

Oxford celebrate Becca May’s first goal last year [David Bauckham/Centre Circle Publishing]

Form

The Women’s Blues enjoyed a stellar league season after the disappointment of relegation in 2016/17.

The Dark Blues won Bucs Midlands 2B at a canter, ending the season seven points clear of second-placed Warwick, and were defeated just once in the league.

In fact, the Blues conceded only once in their four league games in 2018, and put eight past opponents Northampton in the final fixture to seal the title.

And they were not far away from sealing a rare league-and-cup double: following a convincing run of four wins to reach the final, Oxford were beaten 6-5 by cross-city rivals Brookes in the Midlands Conference Cup, and finished as runners-up.

Their opponents have struggled in the division above – Midlands 1A – this season, finishing fourth out of six teams. Indeed, Cambridge have conceded 26 goals in their ten league fixtures this season: Oxford’s forwards will be keen to test a leaky defence right from the start.

Key Players

Dom Thelen

Thelen celebrates his opening goal in last year’s Varsity

Thelen’s opener in last season’s Varsity sent Oxford on the path to victory, and his goalscoring form has continued in 2017/18. He has netted 16 times in 18 appearances this season, and match-winning braces in derby games against Cambridge and Brookes underline his ability to rise to the occasion.

Ellana Slade

Slade celebrates after last year’s 3-1 win

Slade, who set up the first of Becca May’s three goals in last season’s fixture, will be one of Oxford’s main attacking threats on Sunday. A hat-trick against Bedfordshire was the standout performance in an impressive season for Slade, who will look to make the difference in her second Varsity.

Alex Urwin

Urwin celebrates last year’s victory

Urwin put in a stellar performance at left wing-back in last season’s Varsity, but is likely to form part of a back three on Sunday. He will look to spray channel balls to wing-backs Jack Witt and Jamie Shaw, and is deadly from a set-piece situation. However, his heading ability will be particularly important: Cambridge’s Stefan Wolf has tested sides all season with his delivery, and Urwin will need to be on top of his game to make sure his corners don’t do too much damage.

Beverly Leon

Leon brings the ball forward in Brookes Varsity

Leon, a graduate student, is vastly experienced player. She spent 2016/17 playing for Sunderland in the Women’s Super League, and previously enjoyed a stint with Chievo Verona in Italy. Leon has been a vital addition to the Blues squad this campaign, and although she will likely start up front, her role goes beyond simply finding the back of the net: the majority of Oxford’s attacking moves go through her.

Jack Witt

Witt looks for a pass in Brookes Varsity

Witt was the match-winner in Brookes Varsity with a wonderful, curled effort from the edge of the box, but it is his energetic running and defensive ability that will be put to the test on Sunday. If he is tasked with marking Ben Bolderson, Cambridge’s diminutive attacking midfielder, then Witt will have a busy day defensively; if Bolderson is on the other flank, then it will be Witt’s responsibility to push on and help out in attack.

Maddie Hooper

Hooper shields the ball under pressure in Brookes Varsity

A rock at the back, Hooper has captained the Blues with credit in 2017/18, and will lead the side out in what is her third Varsity. Her side conceded only eight goals in ten league games, and is part of an experienced defence that contains fellow returning Blues Lucy Harper and Claudia Hill. Hooper’s defensive nous will be crucial, but her creative ability may also prove important: she impressed in Brookes Varsity when playing the ball out from the back.

[td_smart_list_end]

Oxford squads to play Cambridge:

Men’s

1. Sean Gleeson, Exeter
2. Jamie Shaw, Hertford
3. Leo Ackerman, Somerville
4. Laurence Wroe*, Pembroke
5. Cian Wade*, Green Templeton
6. Sam Hale*, Worcester
7. Mohamed Eghleilib, Harris Manchester
8. Wulfie Bain*, Brasenose
9. Dominic Thelen*, Wycliffe Hall
10. Till Wicker, St Catherine’s
11. Takahiro Tsunoda, Wolfson
13. Jack Witt, Hertford
15. Alex Urwin*, Exeter (captain)
17. Tom Faktor, Pembroke
18. Harry Langham, Wadham
20. Matthew Naylor, Merton

 

Women’s

1. Anna Garcia, Madgalen
3. Claudia Hill*, Linacre
4. Kiah Rutz, Kellogg
5. Maddie Hooper*, LMH
6. Issy Stainsby, New
7. Lucy Harper*, St Peter’s
8. Helen Bridgman*, St Hugh’s
9. Mary Hintze*, Trinity
10. Beverly Leon, Green Templeton
11. Sherona Claro Forrester, Linacre
12. Ellana Slade*, Trinity
13. Louise Nolan*, Wadham
15. Erin Robinson, Oriel
16. Katie Plummer*, Wadham
19. Brigid Lahiff, Regent’s Park
20. May Martin*, Hertford

* denotes returning blue

Vice chancellor calls for calm as new pensions deal proposed

2

A new deal has been proposed by Universities UK (UUK) in an aim to solve the ongoing pensions dispute, potentially bringing widespread industrial action to a halt.

Under the proposed agreement, the current defined benefit pension scheme will remain in place until at least April 2019. According to the University and College Union (UCU), it will also ensure that a full switch to a defined contribution scheme is entirely off the table.

It follows vice chancellor Louise Richardson sending an email to all staff this afternoon, outlining her hope that the “University can come together in recognition of the concerns of many of our staff”.

Following further negotiations this week, the UUK board met this afternoon and agreed a proposal aimed at resolving the pension dispute. That proposal has now been sent to UCU members, with branch representatives due to deliver feedback on Wednesday.

Alongside a commitment to maintaining the current pension system until 2019, the deal also proposes a “Joint Expert Panel”, comprised of actuarial and academic experts nominated in equal numbers from both UCU and UUK.

It is hoped the panel will agree to the key principles which will underpin the future joint approach of UUK and UCU to the valuation of the Universities Superannuation Scheme  (USS) fund.

The valuation of the scheme has been a serious source of contention throughout the dispute, with UCU consistently criticising the methodology used to calculate the USS’s supposed £6.1 billion deficit.

According to UCU Secretary Sally Hunt, the work of the group will also “reflect the clear wish of staff to have a guaranteed pension comparable with current provision whilst meeting the affordability challenges for all parties, within the current regulatory framework.”

Oxford University said in an online statement that the proposed deal “would be very good news for our students, preventing further disruption to their studies.”

Earlier this afternoon, vice chancellor Louise Richardson sent an email to all staff where she bemoaned how “the collegiality of our community has been undermined” by the ongoing pensions dispute.

She said: “We face a shared problem: a pension scheme to which both employers and employees contribute which has been assessed as having a substantial deficit. We have a shared interest in finding a solution that offers the best possible affordable pension now and into the future.

“Like other employers and employees we have signed on to collective bargaining and are bound by it. I know that this is frustrating for many of us who would like to find our own solution right away, but we can’t. I can personally commit, however, to accepting any solution agreed at the Joint Negotiating Committee by UCU and UUK.

“Much of the disagreement arises over the validity of the estimate of the deficit (£6.1 billion). I know we would all be delighted to learn that the current estimate exaggerates the deficit. I very much hope that the proposals for an independent panel of experts, with membership agreed by UCU and UUK and working transparently, will be accepted, will start work immediately, and will command confidence in their conclusions.

“Congregation will be convening on April 24 to discuss the issue and to solicit proposals that can be fed into our Pensions Working Party for analysis. I hope that this can be a moment when the University can come together in recognition of the concerns of many of our staff and in collective pursuit of a solution to the shared problem we face.”

Last week, it was confirmed that Oxford had excluded USS members from the University’s Pension Working Party on conflict of interest grounds. This position has now been formally reversed, and there will be a greater input from USS members going forward.

Meanwhile, the identity of four of the six Oxford colleges who pushed for the controversial pension scheme changes remains unknown. Only Hertford and Pembroke have revealed that they responded to a 2017 UUK survey with a desire for “less risk”, but leaked documents suggest that four other colleges did the same.

Oxford UCU has been contacted for comment.

Letter to: My Ex

0

“You look like you need to drink more… to forget,” one of our friends said to me recently after I got sconced about you. She implied I should regret what happened between us. What followed was a moment of lucidity, as with bewilderment I replied “Why would I want to forget?” The experience you gave me helped to shape me immensely and was filled with realisations – I dread to think of the person I’d be without them.

When I stumbled back into my room in the early hours of the morning the night you rejected me, amidst the tears I had a joker-like grin on my face. This was heartbreak shown to me for the first time. What I felt for you was my first taste of a fraction of love. I’d been in a stale year-long relationship with someone else I felt nothing for, and I’d dumped him to be with you for a matter of days. It was worth it.

All we are in this world is a series of moments, and the search of beautiful moments is to me this world’s purpose. In first week I wrote an essay while I had the flu on how D. H. Lawrence only allows his characters one great epiphany – for it not to be seized is for them to waste their lives forever. In my fever the Talking Heads songs Once in a Lifetime and This Must be the Place probably were left to play over a hundred times. I was poised for my life to change, to leave my bad relationship, for a great moment to strike, and in second week I met you.

Monday: a vague hope for an Oxlove… Wednesday: sending you bad messages from Parkend… The rest of the week, a struggle waiting to see you again. When just the two of us  went to Burning Down the House the next week and Once in a Lifetime played, I felt like destiny was converging in on me. A song about the flow of the universe being interrupted by a profound second of clarity. This was a moment, a night, that would change my life – not necessarily because it promised any future, but because in memory I could always return to its intensity. The first kiss you gave me is still the best kiss I’ve ever had.

None of what happened may have meant anything to you, and the attachment I developed came far too quickly. There is no need to pity me, though. I said, in vain hope I could make things work, that I was happy to get hurt. I’m so glad you crashed through the prison I was in and showed me a piece of what the world had to offer like the extravagant, boisterous wreck of a guy you are. Remember I liked you for who you were – for standing up for yourself and smiling through choruses of boos. I have moved on and grown up a great deal, but I’ll be here if you change your mind.

Lawrence’s Ursula says ‘As an end in itself, I could love a hundred men, one after the other.’ You were the real start, and I can only ever look back on those experiences with gratitude and elation – never an ounce of regret.

Britain must take firm action against Russian aggression

0

After Putin’s recent victory in an election that was a foregone conclusion, the question of how Britain should react to the use of illegal and potentially devastating chemical weapons on its soil increases in significance. If indeed Putin is directly culpable for the attack on ex double-agent Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia, as seems to be the almost unanimous consensus of both the security services and Parliament, how Britain reacts sets the frame for its future dealings with the man who is going to be leading Russia for at least another six years.


The evidence of Russian responsibility for this attack seems overwhelming, and the most obvious explanation is that the use of the deadly Novichok nerve agent was ordered by Putin. The use of Novichok, a Soviet and Russian developed nerve agent, was a calling card from Russia, designed to show Britain, and the wider world, that defectors and perceived traitors would never be safe. Moreover, Britain, an old adversary, was seen to be an easy target, increasingly isolated on a global stage, detached from its old European allies and unable to rely on an erratic American president. The response of Theresa May’s government is vital in showing Russia, and other hostile groups who perceive Britain as an easy target, that any attack that endangers the British public will be met with severe consequences. The initial response from the British government, expelling 23 supposed Russian spies, suggests that the government is taking this attack seriously, in contrast to the feeble response to the murder of Alexander Litvinenko in 2006.

Expelling diplomats or spies and preventing royals and ministers from attending the world cup in Russia may be strong measures in the world of diplomacy, and are a natural first step, but in terms of meaningful acts that will actually hurt Putin and his supporters, Britain must go further. Russia will naturally retaliate and has already expelled 23 British personnel in a tit-for-tat response. Now is the time for Britain to step up and match the harsh condemnation with meaningful action.


The government can start by using existing powers, and where necessary seeking new ones, to finally take action against corrupt and illegal money used to finance the lavish lifestyles of Russian oligarchs and associates of Putin. The assets of those responsible for attacks on British soil should be frozen, and effective sanctions imposed on the Russian state, actions that will hurt those responsible and put pressure on Putin. The difficulty for Britain lies in walking the tightrope between a measured response and a meaningful one. If Britain condemns Putin for flouting conventions and the rule of law, the government must act within the law, and not target Russians simply for association, there is plenty of scope for the government to hurt Putin and his cronies by targeting those who have operated outside of the law.

In addition, calls to ban RT, the Russian state-sponsored television channel which effectively acts as a propaganda piece for the Kremlin, should be ignored. Britain claims to be a bastion of liberalism and free-speech, and banning those who disagree, even if they shroud their arguments in lies and support states that use chemical weapons to assassinate dissenters, would be a shift away from liberalism and a small victory for those who seek to undermine it.

Of course Britain’s response depends heavily on the attitudes of its Western partners and, in a post-Brexit world in which Trump is the leader of the most powerful nation on earth and Britain’s closest ally, this is not to be taken for granted. However, the initial response from key players such as France, Germany and the U.S., even if slightly delayed, has been encouraging. Britain is still a huge player on the international stage, possessing a seat on the UN Security Council, being a nuclear power, and having the sixth largest economy in the world ensures that Britain still retains global clout. Britain must now use all legitimate and necessary powers to hit back at Russia, with the help of Western friends, and show the leader of Russia for the foreseeable future that he no longer has carte blanche to endanger western citizens and advance his own schemes which make the world a more dangerous place.

Boat Race Preview: Oxford crews enter event as underdogs

0

More than 250,000 people will line the banks of the Thames this weekend, and a further 15 million will be glued to their TV screens, as the flagship Varsity sporting event of the year rolls into town. With the women’s race starting at 4.31pm, and the men’s just over an hour later at 5.32, we are set for a fantastic afternoon’s viewing.

History of the race

An engraving of the 1841 boat race

Oxford are playing catch-up in both the men’s and women’s event. This – the 164th men’s boat race – will kick off with Cambridge narrowly ahead with 82 wins to Oxford’s 80. The sharper among you will have worked out that 82 and 80 don’t add up to 163. The “missing race” can be accounted for by a dead heat in 1877.

Cambridge hold an even greater lead in the history of the women’s event, with 42 wins to Oxford’s 30. The light blues also hold the course record in both events, the women completing the 4.2 miles from Putney to Mortlake in a time of 18 minutes and 33 seconds in 2017, the men in a time of 16 minutes and 19 seconds in 1998.

That said, certain omens don’t work in Cambridge’s favour. Both the men’s and women’s crews have sunk more recently than their dark blue counterparts – in 1984 and 2016 respectively. To their credit, the women’s crew of 2016 managed to resurrect the situation and at least complete the course, but the result was a lost cause by that stage.

Where to watch

Rowers pass Furnivall Gardens

If you’re at home for the race, then coverage begins on BBC1 from 3.50pm.

If you’re in London on the day, then there will be fan parks with big screens showing the race in both Bishop’s Park near Putney Bridge beside the start line and at Furnivall Gardens, close to Hammersmith Bridge in the middle of the course. Unless you arrive very early on the day then it can be difficult to see the boats coming past due to the depth of the crowds, so the fan parks are to be recommended.

Other popular viewing spots include Hammersmith, Barnes and Chiswick Bridge.

Who are the favourites?

The Cambridge women are on average 3kg heavier than the Oxford crew and have a more experienced crew; the Dark Blue boat contains only one returning blue. That said, form is on the side of Oxford, who have won four of the last five races.

Despite winning four of the last five races, Oxford’s men go into the race as underdogs, with just two returning blues after the controversial withdrawal of Joshua Bugajski through illness.

They will also be fielding a considerably lighter crew than the Cambridge boat, who will pack in at an average of 86kg per man. Ominously for Oxford, 58% of boat races have been won by the heavier crew. A combination of these factors will see Cambridge start as the odds on favourites.

Watch out for

The coin toss. History shows this to be a crucial moment in determining the outcome of the race. The captain who wins the coin toss chooses whether to row on the Middlesex or the Surrey side of the river. As the course winds around bends in the river, there is a huge advantage to be gained from being on the inside of the bend.

Particularly successful crews get out in front early on in the race, and are then at liberty to take the inside track on each and every bend. Crews who have won the toss and subsequently chosen the Surrey side have gone on to win 62% of Boat Races.

The start of the race is of crucial importance, with 88% of crews who have reached Hammersmith Bridge first going on to be victorious.

The crews

The 2018 Boat Race crews (Photo: The Boat Race/Twitter)

Women:
Bow: Renée Koolschijn (Keble, 73.4 kg)
2: Katherine Erickson (Wolfson, 69.6 kg)
3: Juliette Perry (Somerville, 73.4 kg)
4: Alice Roberts* (St Edmund Hall, 67.0 kg)
5: Morgan McGovern (St Catherine’s, 72.1 kg)
6: Sara Kushma (Christ Church, 73.5 kg)
7: Abigail Killen (St Cross, 70.4 kg)
Stroke: Beth Bridgman (St Hugh’s, 67.8 kg)
Cox: Jessica Buck (Green Templeton, 53.5 kg)

 

Men:
Bow: Iain Mandale (St Edmund Hall, 75.1 kg)
2: Felix Drinkhall (Lady Margaret Hall, 83.8 kg)
3: Will Cahill (Chris Church, 84.3 kg)
4: Anders Weiss (St Hugh’s, 91.5 kg)
5: Will Geffen* (Keble, 87.2 kg)
6: Benedict Aldous (Christ Church, 95.6 kg)
7: Claas Mertens (Christ Church, 73.9 kg)
Stroke: Vassilis Ragoussis* (Linacre, 88.2 kg)
Cox: Zachary Thomas Johnson (Wolfson, 54.7 kg)

* denotes returning blue.

Government blocks Oxford MP’s bill for rough sleepers

0

The Government has blocked a bill sponsored by Oxford MP Layla Moran to repeal the Vagrancy Act, which makes it illegal to sleep rough.

Moran’s Vagrancy (Repeal) Bill would scrap the 1824 Vagrancy Act, which permits the arrest of homeless people sleeping on the streets.

The legislation was due for second reading, but Conservative MPs blocked Layla Moran’s Bill from advancing through the parliamentary process. The Bill could therefore not be ‘read’ a second time.

The Vagrancy Act has already been repealed in Scotland and Northern Ireland.

Layla Moran MP said: “I am shocked, if not surprised, that the Government have blocked debate on this legislation that would change the law to end the criminalisation of rough sleepers.

“I’ll be keeping up the pressure on the Government and will continue to fight to change the law.

“We must end the situation where homeless people can still be arrested and dragged before the courts using a heartless, Dickensian law dating back to 1824 just because they don’t have anywhere to spend the night.”

Last month, Cherwell reported that Moran would take up this cause in part due to the efforts of students in Oxford.

Oxford SU’s ‘On Your Doorstep’ campaign petitioned the UK Government to repeal the Vagrancy Act, gaining over 10000 government signatures, triggering a government response.

https://www.facebook.com/OnYourDoorstepCampaign/posts/1998994050364196

Chair of Oxford SU’s ‘On Your Doorstep’, Alex Kumar, told Cherwell: “No one is surprised to see the government yet again refuse to engage on this issue. Every year that Theresa May has presided over this country, either as Home Secretary or as Prime Minister, rough sleeping has increased.

“This is symptomatic of a deep wound in British society, and – as if being forced to sleep rough were not awful enough – the government is rubbing in salt by using procedural ploys to protect the abominable pre-Victorian law that sees homeless people harassed and brought before the courts for sleeping rough or peacefully begging.”

“The campaign to repeal the 1824 Vagrancy Act goes on. The government can swat us away but we will keep coming back.

“The government can do us all the decency of at least explaining why it has the temerity to defend such a barbaric law.”

Kumar drew attention to the fact that MPs from across six parties have already signed onto Early Day Motion 903, which calls for the Act’s repeal.

The Bill was co-sponsored by Green Party co-leader Caroline Lucas MP, and other Liberal Democrat MPs, including Deputy Leader Jo Swinson.

The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government did not respond to Cherwell’s request for comment.

Discarded Boat Race rower denies ‘bust-up’ rumours

1

Joshua Bugajski, the Oxford rower removed from the Boat Race crew days before the main event, has denied rumours of a “bust-up” with coach Sean Bowden.

Bugajski, a veteran of two Boat Races, fell ill last week, and was replaced in the men’s boat by Christ Church student Benedict Aldous in training. On Wednesday, Oxford University Boat Club (OUBC) confirmed that 20-year-old would row in Saturday’s race in Bugajski’s place.

Then, on Wednesday evening, footage emerged of Bugajski training with Great Britain at the national team’s headquarters in Caversham – where he pulled an impressively quick time on the ergometer.

At a press conference on Thursday, Bowden admitted that the decision to replace Bugajski in the boat was not exclusively due to his supposed illness.

“I think it’d be fair to say that Josh [Bugajski] being a more experienced guy, quite a strong character, yes, we would have had certain times when we would have found ourselves in disagreement over some things,” said Bowden.

“I’ve never been through a Boat Race season without disagreements and healthy discussion is essential to bring a team together. Sometimes that can be more prolonged and disruptive than you’d like it to be, other times crews that are too malleable are not very good either.

“We had a number of issues this year with the boat not functioning as well as we’d like it to,” Bowden said, “and I think for whatever reason we found that when Benedict came in we had a good restart, made good progress.

“There was an uncertainty about Josh’s recovery and we just made our decision. When Benedict came into the boat we had a really positive experience with that. With the time available, we said we just need to get on with it.”

After it was raised that Bugajski had been training with Great Britain, Bowden said: “If Josh has recovered well, then good luck to him, [but] we don’t have him in a boat.”

But Bugajski has denied that the rift between the pair went beyond “disagreements”.

He told WEROW: “I don’t have much to add on top of Sean’s answers at the press conference today. I was very ill last week, and Sean felt the boat was going well in my absence.

“Of course, we have had our disagreements over the course of 4 years training under him, but there was certainly no ‘bust-up’ as has been rumoured.

“It’s a tough sport and tough decisions are made.” he told us. “I’ve learnt a lot from Sean as a coach which I will always be appreciative of, and will be cheering on the Oxford crew on Saturday. I’ve now moved into training at Caversham, and my focus has moved onto GB trials in April and gaining selection for the World Rowing Championships in September.”

Bugajski’s absence means that Oxford are without their heaviest rower, and go into the race considerably lighter than Cambridge. While weight is often overplayed as a factor, it is notable that 58% of Boat Races have been won by the heavier crew.

Cambridge are odds-on favourites with most bookmakers, and Bowden – Oxford’s coach since 1997 – is well aware of their underdog status.

“We do what we can to turn that around,” he said . “I think we see ourselves as people with a big challenge and a lot to learn.

“We don’t look at the odds, but every crew has a chance and some crews have a bigger chance than others. It’s not the hand you’ve got but how well you play.”

The Boat Races take place this Saturday. The Women’s race starts at 4.31pm, with the Men’s at 5.32pm.

? We caught up with OUWBC and OUBC as part of their final preparations this Tideway Week…

Posted by The Oxford and Cambridge Boat Race on Thursday, March 22, 2018

Oxford academics launch ‘blockchain university’

1

A group of Oxford academics have launched the world’s first “blockchain university”.

Unlike most higher education institutions, Woolf University will not have a physical campus, but will use an app which allows academics to advertise their services to prospective students, who can then select modules that match their requirements.

Blockchain technology will be used in the regulation of contracts and payments, and to record academic progress.

Over the course of a few years, students would be able to acquire credits towards undergraduate degrees, which would be placed on the blockchain and which will be accredited by traditional higher education institutions.

Woolf’s founder and director, Joshua Broggi, is a junior research fellow at Wolfson College.

He told Cherwell: “The aim of Woolf is to improve two conditions in higher education, namely, poor employment for academic professionals and high tuition for students. These are really challenging topics, and new solutions will have to be creative.

“We’re using blockchains with smart contracts to automate core administrative procedures, which can lower our overhead costs, reduce tuition fees, and secure significantly better salaries for academics.”

According to Woolf’s white paper, “for students, it will be the Uber of degree courses; for teachers, it will be the Airbnb of course hosting.”

However, Broggi clarified that there is an important difference between Woolf and Uber.

“One giant difference between Woolf and Uber is that there will be no corporation that owns Woolf and extracts the profits,” he said.

“Blockchains allow us to build a decentralised, autonomous organisation. The savings are passed on to students and academics.”

Woolf will organise itself around the Oxbridge collegiate system, with its first college, Ambrose, to be formed by 30 academics. Ambrose’s launch is planned for the third quarter of 2018.

Tuition will be delivered via one-to-one or one-to-two tutorials and lectures, like at Oxford, which can be conducted either using Skype or similar programmes, or face-to-face. Students will be expected to write two essays a week for three years.

Broggi clarified that Woolf is by no means an online-only university. He told Cherwell: “We are using a blockchain technology to run the administration, but this can be applied both to distance learning and to a traditional college setting. That’s what we mean by Woolf being geographically agnostic.

“We’re keen to see our own college have a physical space, to be used by many of our faculty members… we don’t want students or academics to be limited by whatever happens to be available in their local geography.”

Broggi said that Woolf has the potential to provide solutions to the problems academics are now facing.

“Most faculty members at Russell Group universities work on short-term contracts, and must reapply to keep their jobs,” he said. “At Oxford that figure is even higher – 63% of the faculty is temporary and over 80% of the researchers. Temporary contracts have become the rule for a new generation of academics. This has had adverse consequences for their families, for their quality of life, and for their finances.

“That is one of the core changes we are making with Woolf. Although the first five colleges will be restricted to those with highly ranked research doctorates, ultimately the Woolf University will be opened to anyone with a certified research doctorate, without any further questions being asked.

“Of course, there would be nothing to prevent existing, degree-granting institutions from adopting aspects of the platform, or joining it outright at as a college – much like UCL or KCL are colleges in the University of London.”

While the Times Higher Education’s report suggested that Woolf’s first degrees would cost over £40,000 to complete, Broggi told Cherwell that they are “intending to offer our future degrees to on-site students in the UK at a rate which is below the 2018 home fees rate of £9,250 per annum, and to keep class sizes to one or two students.

“At Oxford, students average about £192 per tutorial, but at Woolf we can lower that quite a bit, even while paying academics a lot more, because our administrative costs are minimal.”

The emeritus professor of educational technology at the Open University, Mike Sharples, said that it would be difficult for Woolf to ensure its teaching was of a high standard. Although blockchain can assure that an interaction has taken place between two parties, it “cannot assure quality”, he said.

However, Professor Sharples did suggest that innovation would be a force for good.

“They’re trying out a new approach to higher education, and just like other sectors such as music have been disrupted, it’s really time that higher education was disrupted in a positive way,” he said.