Monday 21st July 2025
Blog Page 797

Restoring the silenced voices in Wide Sargasso Sea

0

Jean Rhys’ Wide Sargasso Sea is a novel that was written as a prequel to Jane Eyre, 120 years after Brontë’s work was originally published in 1847. Both texts can be viewed as feminist works, yet the notion of womanhood differs drastically in each. Although both novels also heavily criticise male control over the female experience, Rhys adds in the dimension of racial oppression pertinent to Victorian Britain. We can see this revisionism present in modern day feminism. Rhys’ novel invites us to question how linked issues of race and gender are – this concept of ‘intersectionality’ is a source of great contention between schools of feminism.

Jane Eyre traces the journey of the eponymous heroine, and provides a social critique for the repression and obstacles that restricted women in Victorian Britain. We are fl eetingly presented with the mixed-race character Bertha, who serves as the protagonist in Wide Sargasso Sea. Although Brontë largely conceals her in Jane Eyre, a modern reading allows us to view her as the principal victim of the cultural oppression that Jane alludes to. Bertha is deprived of a voice in Jane Eyre, but Rhys seeks to restore that voice in Wide Sargasso Sea.

The respective plots of the novels revolve around the female experience in relation to societal repression, much of which manifests itself through Rochester. He is an expression of the Victorian patriarchy, and his attempts to control both Bertha and Jane are reflections of the stifling environment of Brontë’s era.

In Rhys’ novel we are presented with the story behind Rochester’s marriage to Antoinette, later to be known as Bertha, who is of creole heritage. Rhys depicts her as an intermediate between black and white. As the daughter of a slave owner and his slave, Antoinette experiences an identity crisis, compounded by poverty and bullying as a child. Rochester never loves her, yet marries her for a £30,000 dowry. This seems to represent Britain’s soulless relationship with its colonies in the Victorian era, and the compression of her personality by both misogyny and imperialism subsequently leads to the severe deterioration of her mental state. The disparity between the novels is that in Wide Sargasso Sea, Antoinette is a victim. In Jane Eyre, however, she is bound to a chair and locked away in the attic.

Whilst Antoinette is portrayed as mentally unstable in both novels, Rhys’ work is more aligned with modern ideas of mental health, and Rochester’s disregard for the causes of his wife’s discontent can be considered emblematic of the current failings of mental healthcare.

He is portrayed as a convinced manifestation of white male privilege in both books, but Rhys’ reading is starker with his colonialist disdain for her difference; Antoinette’s curly hair, distinct English diction, and different mannerisms enrage her husband.

Many laud Rhys as a pioneer for highlighting the discomfort of the British when confronted with social difference, and it is interesting to note that she was writing as a contemporary to the climate of Enoch Powell’s infamous ‘Rivers of Blood’ speech. Wide Sargasso Sea presents a more fluid concept of what it means to be a woman, and provides a more modern insight into the many layers of oppression suffered by Antoinette, including patriarchy and colonialism. Feminist commentators have added that the novel was a necessary addition to Jane Eyre, in the same way that modern feminists suggest that feminism must draw on various oppressions such as racism and classism to truly create a holistic image.

The best illustration of this dynamic is when Rochester imposes the more English name ‘Bertha Mason’ onto his wife, in place of the more florid ‘Antoinette’.

This is an example of how Antoinette’s individuality is such a threat to Rochester that he has to reshape her identity so that he can feel at ease: a kind of censorship of her difference.

As with all great works, Wide Sargasso Sea has many echoes relevant today. We cannot view feminism as a binary struggle between male power and female disenfranchisement – there are several facets of such dynamics.

The case study of Antoinette also serves as an example of the complexity of mental health. At the end of Jane Eyre, she sets Rochester’s house alight and commits suicide: a potent way of describing the dangers of mishandling mental health.

Reimagining the Ordinary

 

This week, Amber Sidney- Woollett explores the work environment by restructuring dark space, whilst Georgia Heneage uses expressive brush strokes and texture to add new depth to familiar scenes. Meanwhile, the work of Anna Mujahid questions reinvention as she seeks to realistically portray friendly faces.

by Georgia Heneage
by Amna Mujahid
by Georgia Heneage
by Georgia Heneage
by Amber Sidney-Woollett
by Amna Mujahid
by Georgia Heneage
by Amna Mujahid
by Amna Mujahid

 

Union announces majority-female term card

3

The Oxford Union has released its Hilary term card, which promises a host of influential names and introduces a new ‘Women’s Leadership Speaker’ series.

Just over 50 per cent of all speaking participants are female, compared to just 21 per cent in Michaelmas term.

Of the 75 guests at the Union, 18 identify as BME, which is an 11 per cent point increase from previous president Chris Zabilowicz’s term.

The speakers include Oscar-winning Hollywood actress and activist Whoopi Goldberg.
Joining her is Saturday Night Live actor Alec Baldwin, currently filming the latest Mission Impossible film. Baldwin was recently criticised after his comments on the #MeToo campaign.

The founding president of Google China, Kai-Fu Lee, will speak at the Union in first week.
Prominent American conservative commentator Ann Coulter, North Korean defector Hyeonseo Lee, and Amnesty International Secretary-General Salil Shetty will also deliver talks.

Among the seven women making up the new ‘Women’s Leadership Speaker’ series are former President of Kosovo, Atifete Jahjaga, as well as UN health advocate, Dr Alaa

Murabit, and British Fashion Council Chief Executive, Caroline Rush CBE.
From the sports and entertainment world, Olympic sailor Sir Ben Ainslie CBE, Spice Girl Mel B, and DJ duo The Chainsmokers all feature.

This Hilary term at the Union will also see notable partnerships with Oxford societies. In association with OU LGBT+ Society, the Union will welcome trans rights activist Gavin Grimm, who last year took a case about transgender bathrooms to the US Supreme Court.
Meanwhile, the Oxford University Islamic Society have teamed up with the Union to host a panel discussion on ‘Islam and Politics’ in 4th week, which includes a former Director -General of Al-Jazeera.

Such panel discussions are a new feature of the Hilary line-up. In fifth week, a panel including the President of NARAL Pro-Choice America will discuss the need for abortion reform.

A discussion on whistleblowing includes a Guardian journalist who covered the release of the Snowdon papers, and a Wikileaks Administrator. It will take place in seventh week.

In her welcome message, new Union president Laali Vadlamani wrote: “It is in diversity that we find strength.

“The advent of globalisation means that we are more aware than ever before of the issues that affect even the most remote corners of the world. We can no longer simply sit by
and watch.”

Speaking about the Women’s Leadership Speaker series, Vadlamani wrote: “Leading an institution which was founded at a time when women were not even allowed to enrol for
degrees at the University does, at times, feel rather surreal, but it is only through discussing the issues that women face that we can hope to further these incredible voices, and what they represent.”

In the weekly debate listings, the Union will discuss the Partition of India and whether tech empires threaten society. In first week, members will debate whether celebrity icons have corrupted feminist movements. By fifth week debaters will tackle the proposition that Westminster’s concerns do not extend beyond the Home Counties.

46% of external debaters are female, while 20% identify as BME, both increases on Michaelmas 2017.

The growth in female and BME involvement in the Union’s calendar for Hilary 2018 follows Cherwell’s report on the society’s mainly white male term card in Michaelmas.

At the time, Oxford SU’s then VP for Women, Katy Haigh, said the institution “should surely have adequate power and resources to engage a more diverse range of speakers.”

The debates for this term, in full, are as follows:

  1. This House believes celebrity icons have corrupted feminist movements
  2. This House believes democracies should never ally with authoritarian regimes
  3. This House believes the rise of tech empires threatens society
  4. This House believes we cannot thrive without religion
  5. This House believes Westminster’s concerns do not extend beyond the home counties
  6. This House regrets blaming Wall Street for the global financial crisis
  7. This House regrets the partition of India
  8. Head to Head: Is NHS reform needed?

The speakers in first week will be Jamie Roberts, Twinkle Khanna, Alec Baldwin and Kai-Fu Lee.

The full release is expected on the Union’s website later today, and physical copies of the term card will be out on Wednesday.


Who’s speaking

Alec Baldwin

Having been an actor on television, film and stage for almost 30 years, Alec Baldwin is one of the most well-known figures in the industry. He is the male performer with the most Screen Actors’ Guild Awards ever,  and in recent years has received worldwide attention for his portrayal of Donald Trump in Saturday Night Live. He is currently filming his role in the latest Mission: Impossible film. He has also recently been embroiled into political controversy of his comments about the #MeToo campaign.

He will be speaking on Friday, 19th January, at 4pm.

Ann Coulter

Ann Coulter is an American conservative social and political commentator. She rose toprominence in the 1990s as an outspoken critic of the Clinton Administration, and has more recently become one of PresidentTrump’s most notable supporters. She describes herself as a polemicist who like to “stir up the pot” and “does not pretend to be impartial or balanced, as broadcasters do.”Coulter has vehemently defended her beliefs in twelve best-selling books, including her recent works Adios, America! and In Trump We Trust.

She will be speaking on Monday, 12th February, at 5pm.

Whoopi Goldberg

An actor, author, comedian, television host, and human rights activist, Whoopi Goldberg is one of the few entertainers to win an Emmy Award, Tony Award, Grammy Award and Oscar. In a career spanning over three decades, Goldberg has been famed for roles in The Color Purple and Sister Act, as well as as hosting the popular daytime talk show, The View. She has stood by Cyndi Lauper in the Give a Damn campaign, combatting discrimination against the LGBTQ+ community, as well as having co-founded andhosted Comic Relief in the US.

She will be speaking on Saturday, 24th February, at 12 noon.

Glenn Close

Notable for her performances in the films The Big Chill, Fatal Attraction and as Cruella Deville in 101 Dalmatians, Close hassix Academy Award nominations to her name. She also starred in the drama series Damages, winning a Golden Globe and two Emmy Awards. As a passionate campaigner for gay marriage, women’s rights and mental health awareness, Glenn is the founder of BringChange2Mind and notably petitioned President Obama to pass the Excellence in Mental Health Act in 2014.

She will be speaking on Wednesay, 7th March, at 8pm.

Gavin Grimm

Shortly after he began presenting as a man whilst at high school in Virginia, USA, parents of other pupils at his school complained about him using the male bathrooms. When the school board banned Grimm from doing so, he took his case against Gloucester County School all the way up to the Supreme Court. Grimm’s bravery in the first ever trans rights case argued before that court earned him the accolade of one of TIME’s 100 for 2017.

He will be speaking on Wednesday, 21st February at 5pm.

Bryan Cranston

An American actor and director, Bryan Cranston is best known for playing Walter White in crime drama series Breaking Bad, a role for which he has won the Emmy Award for Outstanding Lead Actor no fewer than four times. He was also widely praised for his portrayals of Hal in the comedy series Malcolm in the Middle, and Dr Tim Whatley in Seinfeld, and is currently starring in Network at the National Theatre. He is further known for his active campaigning against AIDS, a cause for which he raised donations at his 2014 Broadway show All the Way.

He will be speaking on Monday, 22nd January at 1pm.

Mesut Ozil

Özil plays for Arsenal whilst also maintaining his position on the German national team – he has represented the country in two UEFA European Championships, as well as in two FIFA World Cups, contributing to 2014 World Cup victory. Considered by many as one of the world’s best players, Özil has won countless awards and Ballon D’Or short-listings.

He will be speaking on Tuesday, 20th February, at 5pm.

Christ Church risk student safety at bops

0

For the last five years, Christ Church has failed to comply with its own fire safety regulations at bops.

The regulations, dating from 2012, limit the number of students allowed to attend events in the JCR where bops take place. They were introduced after a fire in Peckwater Quad in 2011.

The capacity limit of 130 people was not enforced until the final bop of Michaelmas 2017, when a ‘one in one out’ policy led to a large queue outside the JCR.

In an email seen by Cherwell, that was sent to JCR members during the vacation, Junior Censor Geraldine Johnson explained why the fire safety policy had suddenly been enforced.

She said she had been informed “very late in the day” about a regulation that “limited the JCR’s capacity to only 130, with up to 170 allowed exceptionally with a managed evacuation plan in place.”

She went on to say the regulations had existed “ever since the College Surveyor undertook a risk assessment following a serious fire in Peck in 2012.”

In a statement to Cherwell, the Dean of Christ Church, Martyn Percy, said: “We acknowledge that the failure to ensure that the fire regulations were widely understood beforehand was an unfortunate oversight.

“However, there is no evidence that conditions for students were unsafe at previous bops and, fortunately, no students have come to harm.”

One Christ Church student told Cherwell: “In previous years, you were allowed to bring as many guests as you liked. People just let their friends in at the gate. It was chaos.”

Another said: “I think it’s concerning that the college has flouted their own safety rules in the past, [they have] also compromised the trust between the college and its students.

“It’s good that this is now being taken more seriously in light of recent events.”

When asked why she and previous censors had not been made aware of the safety regulations, the Junior Censor told Cherwell: “Colleges are complicated organisations.

“The Junior Censors are told to a certain extent about our responsibility towards fire safety, but we’re not the primary fire safety officers.”

She added: “I don’t think we’ve [previously] been massively exceeding the number limits in a way that would have caused serious fire risks.”

Johnson said it was only while in the process of checking the capacity of the Graduate Common Room for a private party earlier in Michaelmas term that she realised there might
be a capacity issue for the JCR.

The Dean said: “We take the safety of the whole college community extremely seriously. Once the Censors became aware of the need to limit numbers at bops, conditions
were reviewed.

“Over the Christmas vacation, the alarm system was upgraded and additional evacuation management procedures were put into place.

“The good news is that we can now increase the safe upper limit to 170 for bops, something we hope our students will welcome.”

Plenty of snow but little silverware for Oxford’s skiers

0

For many on the Varsity trip, arrival in the Alps heralds hurried checking-in before an immediate trip to the local supermarkets for raids of all the pasta and boxed wine in sight. Then people can look forward to a week of sun and snow, late nights and lie-ins, après
afternoons, and perhaps some skiing thrown into the mix.

Needless to say, these aspirations differ to those of the competitive skiers. Indeed, both OUSSC and CUSSC travel out earlier than the merrymakers to squeeze in a few extra days of training before trials and the races.

Oxford’s skiers were keen to build on successes of previous years, specifically the double victory in 2016 of the men’s and ladies’ Dark Blues teams. Thus, the intensity of OUSSC training shifted up a gear this Michaelmas. Rising club numbers led to strong representation at training sessions at Iffley and twelve athletes were enrolled in the Blues’ Performance Scheme.

News of freshly-fallen snow greeted skiers upon their arrival; a good omen as snowfall is often a concern given the timing of the trip in early December. However, because the snow had been so unexpected, the ‘Stade’ (the race piste finish opposite the VarCity) had not been prepared by the resort staff and so skiers were faced with a commute up to the glacier, where no spectators were allowed to watch, and skiers were chased down the Alps, a wind chill of -28°C at their backs.

The Varsity races’ format consists of two runs of giant slalom (GS) followed by two runs of slalom (SL). The collated times of the fastest four in each team in each event are put into the scoring system, and the team with the quickest overall time are declared the winners.

GS is the race discipline most akin to the average person’s skiing style, medium length sweeping turns in a fairly regular meander down the piste. Conversely, slalom is more dynamic. The much shorter skis call for tight, sharp turns, almost bouncing between edges,
characterised by tracing a line down the course as close to the gates (coloured turning poles) as possible.

The drastic difference in requirement of these two disciplines forms the basis of selection, hence team members are split between those with technique and those with speed. With GS passing in the morning, the men’s and women’s 1st teams from Cambridge set
themselves a slight advantage, with all other teams remaining fairly evenly matched.

In the afternoon, initial speed out of the start proved to be critical on a very shallow course that grew increasingly rutted throughout the session to the extent that, by the turn of
the men’s and women’s 3rd teams, just negotiating the flume-like track without mishap was a greater concern than setting a fast time.

In the slalom, the Oxford 1st teams both made up ground on their Cambridge counterparts, while falls in the Cambridge 2nds and Men’s 3rds led to decisive victories
for Oxford.

Against stronger Cambridge competition than last year many Oxford skiers put in strong performances, Varsity veterans and near-novice alike, with the pool of skiers showing excellent promise for future competition.

Special mentions must include Ben Reeves, who placed 3rd overall in the men’s GS, and Olivia Jones, who placed 3rd in the ladies’ slalom.

Don’t kill the House of Lords, fix it

0

As we begin to recover from the New Year’s Eve parties and brace ourselves for the start of yet another year, there are new job titles awaiting those who have been appointed to the House of Lords in the New Year’s honours list. The recent appointments take the total up to 794 members, meaning it is the second largest chamber to China. Popular public opinion imagines the House to be an archaic institution whose members, kitted out in scarlet robes, rule the lives of the everyday person. The Lords’ function is to complement the elected House of Commons, by checking and challenging government.

Initially, it was designed to be an advisory body for the monarch, but with the emergence of the Commons in the 14th century, the Lords’ influence on affairs of the state diminished as the dominance of the Commons grew. Given its muted role, surely the contention concerning the House of Lords is misjudged?

Just by looking at the composition of the House, however, the cracks start to appear to reveal an outmoded institution. Women first entered the chamber in 1958 and calls for reform saw the New Labour initiative to reduce the number of hereditary peers in 1999.
Despite this, the House currently hosts more than twice the number of male members to female members and ninety-two of its members are hereditary peers.

David Cameron’s government saw the most members appointed by any Prime Minister, bloating the House. Therefore, when the bill to trigger Article 50 had to go through the Lords, the relevance of the House was once again brought into question.

Having the biggest democratic decision of our lifetimes requiring approval from an unelected body is difficult to justify, even though the Lords had no power in overturning the bill. This, along with circulating footage of peers falling asleep in sitting sessions has compounded to a very negative view of the chamber, out of touch with the public and unrepresentative of those they are instructed to serve.

Hence, there have been calls to abolish the House. Whilst this appears to be a democratic proposal, in practice it undermines democracy as it both removes the crucial checks and balances to our government, and the expertise that the Lords bring to the table.
The House includes retired generals, trade union leaders and academics alike who use their experience to enhance our laws. Therefore, the House requires reform rather than removal. However, proposed reforms such as having a hybrid house of elected and appointed members, or even having a fully elected house are unworkable.

To do either would confuse the relationship between the two Houses and would attract politicians rather than the experts that the House prides itself on.

Instead, the reform that needs to occur must be more specific, targeting the aspects of the House that are particularly undemocratic, yet retaining its uniqueness.

Limiting the number of members by not having life peers, phasing out the remaining heredity and Lords Spiritual peers and means testing expenses (which currently stands at £300 a day per member) are some measures that would help focus the House and restore public faith.

Ultimately, it needs to be a more representative body. London has five times more members in the chamber than the north–west of England, despite the two regions having similar levels of population. Therefore, in order for the House to continue to be relevant and conduct its role to the highest degree it must both comprise and engage with all members of society.

By doing so, the public can invest their faith in the Lords knowing they will comprehensively carry out the work the chamber was designed to complete. It is time the comfort of being an established institution is challenged and the House acknowledges the necessity of reform.

Kabakov Tate Review- ‘an exercise in alternative perspectives’

0

Ilya and Emilia Kabakov’s ‘Not Everyone Will Be Taken into the Future’ is an exercise in alternative perspectives, the most pressing of which transports the viewer back to a childhood way of viewing the world. The exhibition opens with Ilya Kabakov’s 1964 painting, Soccer Player; at first glance, the image is innocent, sky blue and yellow and simplistic like a children’s illustration. But peer through the silhouetted body of the player and the landscape behind depicts the rural town Uglich, home to one of the USSR’s first hydroelectric power stations that was built in 1930s through forced labour.

Ilya Kabakov, rejecting the approved artistic style of the Soviet Union, supported himself as a children’s book illustrator from 1955 to 1987. Although he made his own work alongside this, the perspective of the world that he presents us with is a consistently childlike one. In Soccer Player, there are several juxtapositions at play – the idyllic rural image and the industrial label, the innocence of the image and the sinister contextual undertones – acting as a reminder that a visual representation of society can be at odds with its reality. This is a truth that becomes increasingly apparent in the process of growing up.

Ilya Kabakov is self-consciously aware of the juxtapositions he creates within his work, with the text accompanying the images often offering new or jarring interpretations. Tested! (1981) presents an image, not unlike those found in the iconic Labybird Classics children’s book series, of a woman collecting her returned party membership card after her commitment to communism has been questioned. The text beneath the picture is celebratory, and yet the reality would have been drastically different. Under Soviet regime, trials to establish the loyalty of a citizen to the party would not have been a cause for joy, but more often a death sentence.

The Man Who Flew Into Space from His Apartment (1985) was Ilya Kabakov’s first ‘total’ installation. Looking through the shards of an exploded door, the viewer is immersed in the artwork. The installation is bold in its challenging of the political regime in which it was created: the walls in the apartment are papered with Soviet propaganda, and the huge hole in the ceiling evidence of Kabakov’s desire to escape the oppressive society in which he lived (something he achieved in 1987, when he was offered a fellowship in Austria).

Despite the scale of Kabakov’s installations, the text that accompanies them still establishes them as illustrations for a larger story. Alongside a room filled with floated saucepans and kitchen utensils are the words: ‘When Olga Nicolaevena came to the kitchen in the morning she saw in the corridor numerous pots, pans and plates, which were flying in the air’. The language used by Kabakov to describe this work – simplistic, exploring a linear narrative, magical – is distinctly similar to that of children’s literature. This is Kabakov’s illustration, but taken from the pages of the books he worked on and enacted on a much more ambitious level.

The exhibition distorts perceptions of space, rendering the viewer powerless in a seemingly endless labyrinth of semi-dark corridors that catalogue Ilya’s Kabakov’s mother’s life. After a mostly chronological journey through the Soviet Union, one is spat out from this maze into a classroom, and a collection of Kabakov’s paintings from the 1970s and 80s. Looking at their work, one cannot help but be transported back to childhood, thrust into this helpless and ignorant position that paralleled the situation many adult citizens of the USSR found themselves in.

Kabakov may have begun his illustration of children’s books as a means of operating outside of accepted Soviet art regulations, but there are elements of illustration in all of his and Emilia’s work, telling the story of the state responsible for their oppression.

‘Not Everyone Will Be Taken Into the Future’ is showing at the Tate Modern until the 28th January. 

‘The worst Chosen One who’s ever been chosen’

0

With the recent release to cinemas of Star Wars: The Last Jedi, the ‘Chosen One’ genre is once again at the forefront of popular culture (not that it ever leaves for long…). What is the ‘Chosen One’ genre? Well, pretty much what it says on the tin: think Star Wars, think Lord of the Rings, think Harry Potter, think Buffy the Vampire Slayer, think young character goes on quest to defeat great evil with ragtag bunch of friends and mentorship from a figure of wisdom (often beardy and old though as far as I can tell that is not actually a requirement).

In thinking about chosen ones, then, I turned to Rainbow Rowell’s 2015 novel Carry On: The Rise and Fall of Simon Snow. Simon is perhaps unique in the genre in that he exists to be a chosen one figure; the character was in fact created initially for Rowell’s earlier novel Fangirl, as a fictional Harry Potter-type that the main character, Cath, could write fan fiction about. In Carry On itself, Simon is pitched as ‘the worst Chosen One who’s ever been chosen’. We’ve been promised a Chosen One, been promised a quest; on the face of it, there is no ambiguity about what kind of story to expect.

And that is exactly the delight of Rowell’s work. This is a woman who knows her chosen ones and so a ‘Chosen One’ story is what you get. We’ve got our resistant hero (Simon), his slightly questionable mentor (The Mage), more intelligent best friend (Penny), enemy (Baz) and actual nemesis (The Insidious Humdrum). It really is a ‘Chosen One’ story. But it is also conscious enough of its own genre to be able to poke fun at it and, most importantly, at itself (like Guardians of the Galaxy kind of does for the superhero genre and Marvel Comics).

I mean for starters: Insidious Humdrum. As is said in Fangirl, it really does sound a bit like the name of an ‘ice-cream sundae’. Then, there are spells that come from advertising slogans like ‘Have a break. Have a Kit Kat’ because in this world, words gain and lose power by being repeated. The novel, on multiple counts, is self-consciously ridiculous.

When Simon’s world (the World of Mages) was first introduced in Fangirl, reviewers criticised it for feeling like a sort of poor person’s Wizarding World – but, rather than shying away from the similarities, Carry On actively invites the comparison. It dares the reader to call it a rip-off by playing up to what the novels have in common only to reveal itself as completely its own (as much as any work ever is).

Simon is endearingly useless and clueless. But the shifting narrative perspective serves to remind the reader of what is often overlooked in the ‘Chosen One’ genre: although this is Simon’s story, it is not just Simon’s story. The Chosen One’s actions have consequences and, in this novel, we get to see them and feel them. In many ways the quest, a key part of the genre, falls into the background of Carry On. Because we know the premise (or think we do), Rowell is left with room to do what she does best and write about people, these people—rising, falling, falling in love.

Don’t skip a trip to see Star Wars, but maybe on your way home pick up a copy of Carry On too. For the ‘worst Chosen One who’s ever been chosen’, it’s a damn good choice.

My album of the year: Leonard Cohen’s valediction

0

Two days before she died on the 29th July 2016, Leonard Cohen’s erstwhile friend, lover, and muse Marianne Ihlen received a letter from her old devotee as she lay on her deathbed. Marianne first met Cohen when they were both on the Greek Island of Hydra, where Cohen had gone in the early 1960s to escape the unromantic modern world and lead a monastic, medieval existence. Or so he hoped.

A lifetime later, Cohen addresses his old friend one last time in the short, beautifully plaintive letter. He writes: “Well Marianne, it’s come to this time when we are really so old and our bodies are falling apart and I think I will follow you very soon. Know that I am so close behind you that if you stretch out your hand, I think you can reach mine.”

The letter is moving because Cohen’s tone, infused as always with a wry, melancholy humour, contains a note of surprise that they find themselves as they do – old and decrepit. Yet his reaction is not of anger, despair or resentment but graceful acceptance. Fifteen weeks later, Cohen kept his promise to Marianne, passing over the threshold of this life into whatever lays beyond.

Like David Bowie’s final album, Blackstar, released two days before he died, You Want it Darker is a swan song, a settling of accounts, and the closing chapter of an artist with a long life and career. As happens inevitably with such works, every note and lyric takes on an ineluctable quality of deeper meaning.

But even if a listener were unaware of the record’s context it would be hard not to clock the valedictory tone of this album. From the enchanting echoes in ‘You Want it Darker’ to the weary, resigned groan, “I’m leaving the table,/I’m out of the game,” the impression is of a man watching the last embers of his life slowly fade. This is a man who is submitting to the world the document of his farewell before closing his arms across his chest and laying down to rest with dignity, gratitude, and grace.

Normally, if someone told me they had never listened to Leonard Cohen before, I would under no circumstances permit them to begin with anything but his first three albums. That trilogy, Songs of Leonard Cohen (1967), Songs From a Room (1969), and Songs of Love and Hate (1971), has always been and will always remain the trust, purest, and most piercing of Leonard Cohen’s contributions. They reveal an earnest, restless, and searching soul in pursuit of an ungraspable goal. In You Want It Darker, the itinerant hungry soul has come to rest.

This last album indisputably joins those first three in the highest category of Leonard Cohen’s work and I would have no compunction in directing a new listener to this record. The bird on the wire has flown and I can only thank him, earnestly, for the gifts he has left us.

2017: The year of Jack Antonoff

Four of 2017’s best albums were co-written and produced by pop’s veiled hero, Jack Antonoff, the man paradoxically behind odes of female liberation and songs of empowerment. His work with Lorde, St Vincent and Taylor Swift has evidenced grand change in each artists’ musical sound, dissected and highlighted through Antonoff’s nostalgic, evocative pop production.

The first of his projects in 2017, however, was Antonoff’s own personal record, Bleachers’ Gone Now, an album that demonstrates the musician and producer’s unabashed ambition. Gone Now is stately, fragmentary, and unflinching, shaping a world around his songs just as his life is moulded by his music. He insists on indulging in every pleasure in the roaring singles ‘Don’t Take the Money’ and ‘I Miss Those Days’, and yet even the album’s quieter moments brim with intertextuality. ‘Goodmorning’ has recurring reprises throughout the record and collaborators Carly Rae Jepsen, Julia Michaels and Lorde sing backing vocals. We infer a sense of the album’s narrative and yet the quiet admission of defeat on the final song, ‘Foreign Girls’, denotes Gone Now as a kind of vanity record, an attempt at creating something big and masterful but not yet complete.

It is his project with Lorde, however, released the very same month as Gone Now, that affirms a shared ingenuity between the songwriters. Melodrama is a reflection of what it means to be a young woman in the shape of a humid pop record, shameless in its self-indulgence. Antonoff’s production perfectly mirrors Lorde’s intimate lyricism, with small touches occurring when most needed: the unobtrusive guitar strums of ‘The Louvre,’ work when contrasted to the post-chorus’s ambient cracklings, and the trap drums oppose the title track’s orchestral pining. Pop melodies are infused with arrangements of misshapen beats and distorted sounds that creep under the skin. They operate on personal and universal levels, perfectly capturing the unparalleled joy of self-awakening and the testing of personal limits as reflected in the sultry summer world that Lorde and Antonoff create: luxurious, audacious, and melodramatic.

The first two albums released in 2017 with Antonoff’s involvement detail summer obsession, intoxicating claustrophobia and nostalgia unrivalled by the present. But Antonoff’s philosophy shifts in the two albums released in the later part of the year – St Vincent’s Masseducation and Taylor Swift’s Reputation expose bitter, rancorous realities after the sweet summer haze of teenage optimism has waned. St Vincent, otherwise known as Annie Clark, and Swift are two figures who have elicited divisive views from audiences, the former due to her unapologetic presence as a female guitarist in a homogenous male domain, and the latter due to her numerous feuds and romantic controversies.

They both exploit these conflicting philosophies through their unexpectedly celebratory records, as the dangerous female archetypes they are assumed to conform to become figures to embrace. Swift becomes the once exaggerated character from her 2014 music video, ‘Blank Space’, no longer a desperate and long-suffering female caricature, but a villainous, paradoxical woman. She is at once heartbreaker and heartbroken, perpetrator and victim, the girl next door, the business woman, the snake. The album induces a new appreciation for Swift’s adaptability, as the sensual siren of ‘Don’t Blame Me’ and the infatuated girl of ‘Gorgeous’ share the same space.

The album is not, as assumed, simply a vengeful defence of Swift’s mistakes, and there are moments of optimism. While Swift’s best love songs have been founded in moments of fantasy (2010’s ‘Mine’ and ‘Enchanted’), the level of specificity and delight found in everyday things (“spilling wine in the bathtub, building blanket forts”) is deliciously and unabashedly present. Reputation could even be the most personal album in Swift’s repertoire, disguised behind discordant, bruising instrumentals and vocal modification. The breathy, gasping tones of ‘Dress’, the synthesised monotony on ‘King of my Heart’, and uncomfortable borderline rapping on ‘End Game’ fail to disguise Swift’s tumultuous, dizzying, and personal lyrics. Despite her reputation, this is quite possibly Taylor Swift’s first album about love.

St Vincent’s Masseducation, however, tears into loneliness. While the shimmering pop production on Reputation allows listeners to unknowingly dance to aching, throbbing lyrics of hurt, the antagonistic production on Masseducation cannot be ignored. Clark addresses her listeners through gritted teeth, producing a guttural voice with startling candor: “I am alone like you”. Clark truly embraces the dangerous female archetype in a way that Swift only jokingly assumes. The guitars shudder instead of echo, wincing at the harsh brutality of Clark’s loneliness. In the album’s first single, ‘New York’, she speaks in the present and yet talks about the past, echoing an exhaustion at the sexual personalities she’s given and roles that she must play.

It is here that Antonoff’s production is key, as Masseducation is ultimately a pop album, or at least redefining the roles ascribed to female pop singers in 2017. “Sugarboy” exemplifies this through its synthesised production, unblemished vocals, the call-and-response refrain, and the Swiftian, even Carly Rae Jepsen-inspired line, “got a crush on tragedy”. These classic pop tropes are inverted, played at a pace too fast, a beat too soon, feverishly weird and intrinsically fanatical. Clark and Antonoff explore the characters of pop, a theme amplified by the album’s visual aesthetic –  the bold colours and robotic music videos play out as a strange futuristic utopia, sedated with pills, alive with lifeless forms and choreographed to perfection. Creating something genuine within this ridiculous landscape seems impossible, and yet Clark and Antonoff achieve this, not through mockery, but by breaching the limits of generic convention.

There is perhaps no other producer working with such high-profile women in pop music, helping to expose their various vulnerabilities, romances and agonies in the same way. Despite this, the achievements of these female artists should never be wholly ascribed to Antonoff. In an age of music preaching female empowerment, all too often it is men behind the scenes, selling a dangerous capitalist feminism to eager young audiences.

But these albums do not show Antonoff orchestrating the success of his collaborators – ingenious lyricism is unmistakably found within the artists themselves. Antonoff contributed to the writing of four of Masseducation’s songs in contrast to Annie Clark’s thirteen credits, and he only co-wrote two of the eleven songs Lorde penned on ‘Melodrama.’ Whatever can be said about Taylor Swift, her role as a business woman in control of her own career can never be doubted. Lorde and Julia Michaels even receive writing credits on Bleachers’ Gone Now, creating true collaborating relationships between these musicians.

Antonoff does not define or validate the artists’ creation, but gives them a technical platform to operate outside of generic convention. Melodrama, Masseducation and Reputation are uncompromising, dazzling displays of artistry, demonstrative of real talent, real sincerity, and real compassion, as the artists turn these stories into technicolour memoirs that will reverberate for years to come. By investigating the boundaries of modern pop music in 2017, Antonoff and his collaborators somehow come to define it.