Saturday, May 10, 2025
Blog Page 80

Oxford’s top choirs lag behind national gender trends

0

Strolling around college quads certain evenings of the week, you’re likely to catch a glimpse of a sea of waist-high gowns and ruffled collars clustered outside. Almost every day, dressed in white cassocks, a select few boys break the silence of college chapels as they lead services in both song and in prayer. 

Christ Church Cathedral Choir, Magdalen College Choir, and New College Choir are Oxford’s three choral foundations – so called because a choir and a school were part of their original founding statutes. At the age of seven or eight, young boys can apply to their prestigious choristerships so that if successful, and until their voices break, they are given access to extensive music training as well as generous bursaries to help cover school fees and the cost of their music lessons. Usually, two-thirds of school tuition fees are paid for. 

The 16 boys in each choir typically sing four to six days a week, up to three times a day in the week’s most popular services – Evensong, Sunday services, and Communions. Most also learn two instruments and sing in the choirs’ official recordings, broadcasts, concerts, and tours. 

Oxford choral foundations’ choristerships are some of the most prestigious in the country. They are also the only British choirs outside of London that don’t include girl choristers. 

Historic and modern background

The tradition of boys and men singing in parish choirs existed in Oxford as early as the 14th century, long before it became popular in the wider Anglican church in the early 19th century (fueled in part by the Oxford Movement, which introduced Catholic liturgical practice in Anglican churches). The tradition “played a part in making UK choral music the envy of the world,” Mark Williams, Informator Choristarum (music director) of Magdalen College Choir, told Cherwell. 

One argument in favour of boy choirs is that only boys can have the desired pure treble voice – that the discrimination is not based on gender, but rather on sound. Yet most music critics say the differences are barely noticeable and that if young male voices sound unique it is simply because they have benefitted from more intensive training. 

More strikingly, the vast majority of adult female sopranos can emulate boy trebles. If the issue were only about sound, it would be preferable to employ adults, who are more experienced and competent, than eight-year-old boys. 

Cathedrals across the country struggling with the cost of educating their choristers have increasingly replaced them with adult sopranos. “Education is an expensive business,” Williams observed, but Oxford choral foundations “hold fast to the value of educating young singers.” 

Tradition, today 

Tradition is one reason why foundation choristers have kept all-male choristerships. Boys have sung for New College Chapel since the College’s foundation in 1379, as originally provisioned by the founder of the College, William of Wykeham. Magdalen College Choir have worked with boy choristers since the foundation of the College in 1480, and Christ Church Cathedral Choir since Henry VIII founded the College in 1546. 

Salisbury Cathedral became the first-ever cathedral to introduce girl choristers in 1991. Since then, most across the country have followed. In 2022, St Paul’s Cathedral in London announced the establishment of a choir of girl choristers who will share the singing of services with the choir of boy choristers. In 2023 Westminster Abbey established a choir of girl choristers to sing some services, separately to the boys choir. 

All three of Oxford’s choir schools which educate the choristers – Christ Church Cathedral School, Magdalen College School and New College School – are boys’ schools, with Magdalen College School accepting girls in the sixth form only.

Williams told Cherwell: “Those schools’ understanding, flexibility and support of the choristers is intrinsic to the success and wellbeing of children … but, for the time being, the schools continue … educating only boys in a city and area where, for whatever reason, there are far more single sex schools than in most parts of the country.”

Current research

A research paper on Oxford’s choral system also found that “construction costs and difficulties in putting up girl’s toilets and facilities” have been cited to justify their reluctance to accept girls to choirs.

Another argument for protecting boy choristers is that these positions have become less and less popular amongst boys, and so if girls were allowed to sing in them fewer boys would join choirs. In 2019, The Times reported that the number of girl choristers was higher than the number of boy choristers in the UK for the first time. 

Mark Williams agrees that people must be careful not to discourage young boys from singing. “Boys [need] a safe space in which to sing and to be proud of singing at a high level, in a world where dressing up in robes and singing in church doesn’t align with preconceived stereotypes of what boys should do.” 

Elisabeth Stenlake, a first-year lawyer, is one of the two female singers in Magdalen College Choir this year. She joined Magdalen after singing as a chorister in Durham where there was both a girls choir and a boys choir. She told Cherwel: “Young girls should have the opportunity to be a chorister [just like the] boys do… but it should be done in a way that is an addition rather than replacing the boys with girls, as all children should have this chance.”

Two years ago, St John’s College Cambridge admitted its first girl choristers to sing alongside the boy choristers in a mixed soprano line. St John’s College School Cambridge is one of many choir schools that provide education for both boys and girls. Last month St John’s faced criticism after ending funding for a separate mixed voice choir, the St John’s Voices, in a move called “fundamentally regressive” by the former archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams. 

In Oxford, Christ Church’s Frideswide Voices, created in 2014, and the Choir of Merton College both include more than 20 girls aged seven to 14 singing around twice each week. But the programmes are not nearly as intensive as those accessible to boys, who sing almost every day. 

Obstacles for older singers

The gender imbalance in top choirs permeates past youth. The three choral foundations choirs were all-male until 2016-2017 and today there are between one and three women in each of them. Some other college choirs have only a few female singers. 

One reason for this is that some men – countertenors – sing the same line as the altos, who are typically women. Traditionally the female voice was associated with the soprano role, and male countertenors were chosen over female altos, irrespective of musical skill and voice quality. The Choir of St Paul’s Cathedral, for example, which has existed for almost a thousand years, appointed its first female alto in 2017.

Women in Oxford choral foundations told Cherwell their experiences have been positive. Stenlake said: “There have been few female altos in this choir before me, but I have found, especially as there is one other [woman], that it has been a very welcoming and supportive environment. It’s a very fun and social choir where I’ve made so many friends. [I] never feel as if my gender impacts my role within the choir.”

Magdalen College Choir is also unique among Oxford Choral Foundations thanks to its Consort of Voices, as it is the only one which gives the opportunity to adult sopranos to sing with the choir. It is made up of clerks from the College Choir and from sopranos from all over the University, and it sings evensong every Saturday during term time. They occasionally also sing extra services during school half-term. 

There are also active mixed choirs around the University which advocate for gender inclusivity. Many college chapel choirs, including all of those that are non-auditioning, are mixed. Quintin Beer, the Director of Music of the Choir of St Peter’s College, told Cherwell: “Our choir is 50/50 gender and it’s important that it remains that way… SPC is dedicated to providing equal opportunities to male, female, and non-binary singers.”

Professional musicians  

The gender imbalance persists in professional choir music, as well. Out of 29 Oxford choirs studied by Cherwell, 25 are conducted by men. Of the four remaining ones, two are conducted by women professionally – Christ Church College Choir and Hertford College Choir. Trinity College Choir and Lincoln College Choir are conducted by a pair of student organ scholars, with one female and one male student in each. 

A study conducted by the Church of England also shows that in 2020 in Church of England cathedrals 350 choral scholars and lay clerks – that is, professional adult singers – were men, against only 70 women. This means 80% of professional singers were male. These figures are very different to those for voluntary choirs, where 410 adult singers were men and 710 were women. 

There is hope that as choristerships are becoming more accessible to girls and as choirs are starting to appoint female singers, women will begin to gain more choral experience, and more will choose to pursue music at university or even professional level. While timelines for change remain unclear, inclusion at early ages will accelerate long term evolution in choral gender integration. 

Linacre College names boat after river campaign group

0

Linacre College women’s first team names new boat after anti-pollution campaign group. The unveiling of River Action took place on 20 April at Linacre College Boat House. 

The College named the boat to praise the group’s efforts in “drawing attention to water pollution on the River Thames believed to be caused by Thames Water.” River Action, the namesake group, aims to promote awareness of river pollution and pressure companies into changing their practices to improve water quality.  

River Action recently tested the River Thames before the Oxford versus Cambridge Boat Race, finding E.coli “up to 10 times higher than what the Environment Agency considers acceptable for designated bathing waters graded poor.” 

Linacre College Boat Club President, Sydney Rose, said “Linacre Boat Club is proud to support the vision of River Action UK to preserve the health of this cherished historic waterway and the people who gather around it.” 

A University rower recently blamed the loss in the Boat Race on a significant portion of the team being ill with E.coli. The crews were advised against entering the water, and told to cover open wounds and wear footwear getting in and out of the boat. 

River Action CEO, James Wallace has said River Action is honored, commenting: “Rowers spend so much of their time on rivers, and they know better than most, because many of them are getting sick, the awful state of our waterways.

“Together with the rowing community, including all the rowers at Linacre College, we are standing up for river health, placing the polluters on notice that we will hold you accountable.”

Linacre College principal Dr Nick Leimu-Brown has said: “We are horrified that its polluted waters are now such a risk to wildlife and public health.” Pollution in Oxford has been of increasing concern in recent years and Port Meadow has been classified as having “poor” water quality for two years in a row. 

Thames Water has recently published plans to upgrade over 250 of its sites, which would “improve performance and reduce the number of overflows during heavy rainfall.” 

Artificial insights: Decoding diversity and redefining art history with AI

0

Being an avid art enthusiast, I’ve always been fascinated by the power artistic expression has to push boundaries and connect people from different backgrounds. Recently, however, I’ve noticed a groundbreaking shift in the art world—a revolution driven by the intersection of creativity and technology. This revolution, spearheaded by integrating artificial intelligence (AI) into artistic processes, is not only redefining the way we create and consume art but also amplifying voices that have long been marginalised. Imagine strolling through a gallery adorned with vibrant canvases, each telling a unique story inspired by different cultures, experiences, and perspectives. Now, envision these artworks not only created by human hands but also by AI algorithms, blurring the lines between human creativity and machine intelligence. This phenomenon is not science fiction; it’s the reality of contemporary art.

A pioneering example of this synergy is the project “DeepDream”, developed by Google’s AI researchers. DeepDream uses neural networks to generate mesmerising, dreamlike images that defy conventional aesthetics. By feeding these networks with vast datasets of images ranging from Renaissance masterpieces to modern digital art, the program learns to interpret and reinterpret visual patterns, allowing it to challenge our perception of reality. But AI’s impact on art extends far beyond the world of abstract imagery. It’s also revolutionising storytelling and narrative development. Take, for instance, the film “Zone Out,” which was created using an AI program called Benjamin and premiered in 2018. The film showed us how AI can be used to weave together narratives inspired by various cultural mythologies and, consequently, result in a cinematic experience that celebrates the richness of global storytelling traditions.

AI has also been democratising artistic expression by providing a platform for underrepresented voices to be heard. Organisations like Artrendex leverage AI algorithms to analyse art collections and identify patterns of cultural representation. This allows Artrendex to highlight artists whose work may have been overlooked due to systemic biases. For instance, these projects have the potential to uncover a previously unknown female sculptor from the Renaissance whose work was overshadowed by her male contemporaries. By promoting diversity and inclusivity in the art world, AI is challenging traditional hierarchies and fostering a more equitable creative landscape.

In the world of art history, it is no secret that the narratives framed around cultural representation have, more often than not, been shaped by biases and Eurocentric perspectives. However, with the rise of AI technologies, there’s newfound hope for decoding diversity and uncovering hidden stories within art collections worldwide. By harnessing AI’s analytical power, we can challenge the status quo and reshape our understanding of the past.

Another remarkable AI application right now is the “Art Genome Project” by Artsy—a comprehensive database that utilises machine learning algorithms to analyse and categorise artworks based on various criteria, such as artistic style, cultural origin, and historical significance. With a bold and ambitious vision, this project seeks to create a more inclusive and nuanced way to appreciate art, emphasising the connections between artists across different cultures and eras.

Perhaps the most impactful use of AI when it comes to reshaping art history narratives lies in its ability to uncover overlooked artists and artworks from underrepresented communities. Initiatives like the “AI for Cultural Heritage” project by Microsoft use machine learning algorithms to find patterns of cultural representation within digitised art collections in order to highlight marginalised voices from this new knowledge. By shedding light on artists who have been historically and systematically sidelined or ignored, AI can challenge longstanding narratives and enrich our collective understanding of artistic legacy.

As we embrace AI’s transformative potential in art history, it’s essential to recognise that technology alone cannot dismantle systemic biases or promote inclusivity. However, for today, I want to emphasise that by using AI’s abilities to partner with diverse communities and foster interdisciplinary collaboration, we gain the power to spark positive change and pave the way for a more equitable and diverse artistic landscape. In the age of AI-enhanced art, the possibilities for creativity and cultural exchange are limitless—and inclusive.

New humanities faculty building to open in 2025

0

A new humanities facility, located in the Radcliffe Observatory Quarter along Woodstock Road, is to join the faculty buildings of Oxford University. The Schwarzman Centre is set to open in 2025 and it will house the institute for Ethics in AI and the Modern Slavery and Human Rights Policy and Evidence Centre.

This new facility’s move to the University has been made possible by a £185 million donation by the Centre’s eponymous benefactor Stephen A. Schwarzman, co-founder of the Blackstone Group, as well as short-time chairman of President Donald Trump’s Strategic and Policy Forum. 

The Centre will consist of a 500-seat concert hall, a 250-seat theatre, a 100-seat ‘black box’ laboratory for experimental performance, a café and a new library. It promises to “encourage experiential learning and bold experimentation through cross-disciplinary and collaborative study.” 

In order to comply with the University’s aim to halve carbon emissions by 2030, the building’s construction will adhere to Passivhaus principles, including the use of solar power generation on the roof and high levels of insulation to reduce the heat needed in the building.

Professor Daniel Grimley, head of the humanities division at Oxford, told Cherwell: “It will be a place to share knowledge and ideas, attend events of a varied nature, and ultimately to find innovative answers to the fundamental question of what it means to be human in an increasingly complex world.” 

As well as housing seven humanities faculties, this facility will now host the Modern Slavery and Human Rights Policy and Evidence Centre. It will be moving to the University from its previous host, the British Institute of International and Comparative Law, after having been awarded extension funding from the Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC). The centre was created in 2019 to “enhance public understanding of modern slavery and transform the effectiveness of laws and policies designed to address it.”

Professor Grimley told Cherwell: “Working in this innovative manner has helped the centre to influence decision-making at a regional, national, and global level.” The recent example he cited was its work in support of the Global Commission on Modern Slavery and Human Trafficking, chaired by Theresa May, “for which researchers gave evidence at Parliamentary groups, and showed how human and evidence-led research can improve the world in tangible ways.”  

The Schwarzman Centre will also be home to Oxford’s new institute for Ethics in AI. Sir Tim Berners-Lee, founder of the World Wide Web, has remarked: “If AI is to benefit humanity we must understand its moral and ethical implications. Oxford with its rich history in humanities and philosophy is ideally placed to do this.”  

Vice-Chancellor Professor Irene Tracey has highlighted the promise that the Centre holds to “benefit teaching and research in the humanities” and “to be a place which makes a genuine contribution to the local community in Oxford as well as the national and global cultural sector.”

War, Peace and Writing

0

Throughout history, art has left an indelible cultural impact on humanity’s collective understanding of war. Picasso’s ‘Guernica’ is perhaps the most famous manifestation of this; but the richer historical tradition is certainly written, with a heritage as far back as Homer’s Iliad and its depiction of the Trojan War. As the outbreak of conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza over the past two years have made the public more cognizant of modern warfare – and while other conflicts continue to elude that public attention, such as humanitarian tragedies in Myanmar, Sudan and the Sahel it seems the right time to reflect on the power of words to poignantly portray the horrors of war for a civilian audience.

Mark Rawlinson argues that modern war literature is “incontestably a literature of disillusionment”, something he attributes to Tolstoy’s War and Peace (1869). This “disillusionment” that comes through in the war narratives was true of Tolstoy’s own military past, fighting in the Crimean War during the Siege of Sevastopol (1854-55); but crucially, it also sets a precedent for modern war writing, which does away with the romantic, top-down narratives of battles that had dominated previously. Despite the grandeur of War and Peace as a ‘historical novel’ (a label its author would have disputed), Tolstoy grounds its scenes in the horrible realities of war and with themes of ignorance and cowardice grounded in a realism akin to Stendhal’s depiction of the Battle of Waterloo in The Charterhouse of Parma (1839). As a historian, Tolstoy repudiated the two most prominent theories of history  that of ‘great men’, and that of Hegelian determinism to demonstrate the helplessness of soldiers against the “antagonistic relation” of their countries. It is through this that Tolstoy gives a bleak picture of war, rooted in its grim realities of unglamorous death and wanton destruction: a picture that had a lasting impact on war literature; specifically, its power to resonate with readers’ emotions and senses of morality. 

Modernist literature of the early 20th century, over which the First World War cast an unmistakable shadow, also reflected a ‘morality’ which was rooted in the ‘reality’ of war. Modernist culture itself represented the “cumulative trauma” (Adam Phillips) of that war, which like War and Peace sought to reject any notions of heroism or romance in the Great War; this was made clear with the powerful anti-war message of Erich Maria Remarque’s All Quiet on the Western Front (1929). The war literature of the early 20th century, while imbued with a distinctly modernist sense of nihilism, also harked back to Tolstoy’s insistence on the futility of war: Andrei’s “jeremiad” (Rawlinson) on page 775 is not dissimilar from some of the poetry of Siegfried Sassoon. Modernism in literature involved the desire to overturn traditional modes of representation in light of war’s horrors, placing the soldier’s experience at the fore to emphasise the true depravity of which mankind is capable. While modern media exposes the terrible humanitarian cost of wars to the public through ever-more-accurate photos and videos. In the days before technology there was something uniquely powerful about the written word in questioning the value, cost and morality of warfare. This literature was a world away from the antediluvian depictions of warfare as glorious and heroic; patriotic accounts by Robert Keable and Ernest Raymond have not made their mark on posterity. 

Indeed, in contrast to the hubristic accounts of victory presented by Renaissance humanists like Leonardo Bruni, modern war literature tends not to see victory as anything more than Pyrrhic; William Manchester’s Goodbye, Darkness: A Memoir of the Pacific War (1979), for instance, presents the reader with horrific accounts of death and human suffering. Even more recent was Sam Hamill’s 2003 Poets Against the War project, which reminds us of the continuing power of literature to act as a cultural bulwark of peace. Yet while the writings of Tolstoy, Sassoon and Martin Luther King present necessarily bleak anti-war messages, we must not lose sight of the power of war literature to bring hope during the bleakness of war itself. As Berthold Brecht pointed out in 1939, there would be singing during the dark times ahead  about the dark times, but singing nonetheless.

Biology department urged to stand against badger culling

0

The department of Biology at the University of Oxford is facing calls for action against badger culling in Oxfordshire in a petition presented to the department on April 17.  Cherwell can confirm the receipt of the petition by the Department of Biology. The Oxfordshire Badger Group has accrued nearly 20,000 signatures on change.org. It calls attention to the “misuse’’ of research from the Department of Biology by the government to justify the badger cull, and urges scientists to “[deploy] their scientific authority’’ to help end it. 

Despite badgers being a legally protected wild animal in the UK, the cull is mandated by the Department for Environmental, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) as a mitigation tactic against bovine tuberculosis (bTB). Current DEFRA policy holds that culling is an effective means to reduce the transmission of bTB from badgers to cattle.

Parliament responded to a previous petition against culling in 2016 with over 108,000 signatures by arguing that there was a “broad scientific consensus’’ on the role of badgers in the spread of bTB, and that they were determined to “use all available measures necessary to eradicate the disease as quickly as possible.”

According to DEFRA statistics, over 210,000 badgers have been culled nationwide as of 2024, although badger protection groups estimate a figure between 230,000 to 250,000. Recently, the controversial introduction of “epidemiological culling’’ has been proposed, which could reduce the badger populations to almost zero in high-risk bTB areas according to the Oxfordshire Badger Group. 

The petition was presented with an open letter to the Department of Biology, following the opening of a public consultation by DEFRA on badger control policies. It points out how the research from the University demonstrated that culling badgers would “not help control bovine TB…yet the government simply overturned your conclusions to justify introducing badger culling. Many of you vocally opposed this in 2012 and 2015 but you were ignored. Now 250,000 mostly healthy badgers are dead.’’ 

Oxfordshire Badger Group views the region as “a heartland for badgers over the centuries’’. Previously, the group has also taken to the streets, holding protests outside the Biology Department and some colleges, such as Merton.

Eileen Anderson, trustee of the Oxfordshire Badger Group, told Cherwell: “We think Oxford scientists should give DEFRA the benefit of their expert opinion. Their silence means that the scientific debate is highly polarised. That allows politicians to cherry pick evidence to support killing badgers. That’s not good for science, for badgers or for cattle farmers.’’

Cherwell received the following response from the Biology Department via the University News Office: “As a department committed to scientific inquiry, we prioritise academic freedom of speech and support the right of individuals to engage in constructive discourse around causes they believe in, including relevant petitions.” 

The DEFRA consultation was initially set to close on April 22, but the closing date has since been extended to May 13. Oxfordshire Badger Group told Cherwell that the extension was “in response to legal pressure applied by our friends at the Badger Trust and Wild Justice, challenging the lack of information and problems with interpretation of the consultation.”

Nailed it! The evolution of nail art at our fingertips.

0

Nail art has truly taken the world by storm. With over 233 million people sharing their designs with #nails on Instagram, it is clear that this is not just a passing trend. In fact, it is one of the oldest trends to ever exist! Dating back to as early as 5000 B.C, the evolution of nail art is a fascinating exploration of beauty standards through the ages. What is now an obsession with bejewelled acrylics, relaxing manicures and intricate gel designs began as an expression of complicated social expectations. When we delve into this complex history, we uncover the deep political entanglements that come with this ancient trend. It is not as pretty as a pedicure!

Surprisingly, nail art began in an era that was almost as dominated by beauty standards as the one we live in now: ancient Egypt. Henna was used on the hands and nails as not only a way to display status amongst the elite, but as a natural supplement, believed to have medicinal qualities. Women of the lower classes used more neutral shades, while the upper classes had access to deeper, brighter shades that conveyed seductiveness and wealth. This is where nail art’s association with femininity began. 

However, nail art was not exclusive to women in every ancient culture. Male soldiers in Babylonia adorned their nails with black and green kohl as a symbol of ferocity. Archaeologists have even uncovered a manicure adorned with solid gold dating back to this period. In the 21st century, precious metals and gemstones are employed as a fancy decorative feature, but they were originally used as a weapon in these ancient wars. 

The first recorded instance of nail art as we see it today was actually the Inca Empire. Spanning across the 15th and 16th century, the Incas painted their nails with eagles. Although this had much more societal significance than the cartoons we often see nowadays, these intricate and tiny designs have hugely impacted the modern industry. 

A fascinating figure in the history of nail art is the Empress Dowager Cixi of China. During her reign from 1825 to 1908, she was instantly recognisable with her 6 inch long, decorated nail guards, made of solid gold and jewels. These protected her long nails, which were a symbol of her wealth as they indicated that she did not take part in manual tasks that would easily cause breakages. 

The manicure as we know it today stemmed from a European podiatrist, Dr Sitts, who adapted a dental tool for use on nails. This created what we know today as the orangewood stick, a staple tool in any modern nail technician’s toolkit. Sitts’ niece then expanded upon her uncle’s invention, creating a full nail care system and reaching the USA. Salons started to become more mainstream around this time, allowing nail care to become accessible to a wide range of demographics and social classes. Apart from salons, many started doing their nails at home as the first nail varnishes began to hit the consumer market. 

The first modern intricate nail designs began with the advent and emergence of acrylic nails in the 1950s. Acrylic nails in the USA quickly became a sign of femininity and style amongst African American women. Donyale Luna featured acrylic nails on her 1966 Vogue cover; she was the first Black woman on the cover of Vogue. Acrylic nails evolved along the disco culture of the 1970s as artists like Donna Summer, Diana Ross and Millie Jackson sported bright red acrylic nails as part of their style. When Florence Griffith Joyner, a former nail artist, won Olympic gold wearing six inch acrylic nails, news headlines were abuzz with discussions of how her nails matched her running gear. Bright and intricate nails were not yet in the mainstream, therefore Joyner’s nails became a big focal point of her Olympic journey. 

Nail art’s popularity was once again boosted by musical artists in the late 1990s and early 2000s as rappers like Missy Elliot and Lil Kim were seen with acrylic nails in their music videos and concerts. Nail art now is more varied and popular than ever, especially with the rise of social media, as everyone from at home nail enthusiasts to celebrity nail technicians can share their art with the world. Everywhere from Pinterest to Instagram to TikTok is filled with nail inspiration; there is no shortage of designs for every type of person. 

Clearly, the history of nail art is more complex than a gel manicure! It has represented social and cultural values for millenium, before becoming a stellar industry in the 20th century. Much like classical art has developed over time, nail art is constantly evolving and will certainly have a fascinating future. 

SU-supported College Disparities Campaign launches to create equal ‘Oxford experience’

0

Following the release of The College Disparities Report, a subsequent College Disparities Campaign has announced its launch. The Campaign uses the findings of the report and suggests solutions to the problems, most notably creating an Endowment Fund, to balance out financial disparities between colleges. An open letter to the Vice-Chancellor, Irene Tracey, will be sent urging the University to take action. On Monday 29th April, a university-wide email from the Student Union (SU) will encourage all students to sign the letter, available to read now on the Campaign’s website.

The report, largely written by the current SU President, Danial Hussain, exposed great financial inequality between colleges, including analysing colleges’ yearly income, academic performance, financial aid systems and accommodation costs.

It also finds a direct correlation between college wealth and high positions in the Norrington Table, which ranks colleges according to the proportion of students receiving each class of degree. Merton College, St John’s College and Christ Church College are consistently some of the wealthiest colleges, and each year they place in the top quarter. The unfair nature of this is highlighted in the report; it also found that one third of students end up in colleges they did not apply to.

Danial Hussain told Cherwell: “the vast disparities in rent are the most materially significant effect of college disparities on the average student.” The report showed that there are higher rents for poorer colleges than in richer colleges. For example, Christ Church offers a subsidised rent of up to 50% for “undergraduates from lower-income households”. Hussain continues, “I will push for a median rent across all colleges – a tangible solution to even out the student experience.”

Co-organisers of the College Disparities Campaign, Danial Hussain and Cem Kozanoglu told Cherwell: “the College Disparities Campaign will build on the report’s findings…” They have proposed a solution in the form of an Endowment Fund. The report explains it as “a sustainable endowment fund which provides reliable funding to the poorest colleges at predetermined rates.” This would come at the cost of disbanding the current College Contribution Scheme, which is a fund that colleges with taxable incomes over £45 million contribute to that poorer colleges can apply for grants from.  

The Campaign stresses that the Endowment Fund would not slow the growth of richer colleges. Instead, their website states that due to richer college’s higher-growth assets, such as stocks and bonds, they will be able “to grow their endowment even after contributing to the Endowment Fund.”

The Campaign’s open letter urges the University to create an Endowment Fund as well as implementing other solutions, such as establishing a College Disparities Committee and revising the 2027 Access and Participation Plan. The letter asks “the University to act swiftly and decisively to address these disparities” so that “all members of the Oxford community have the same opportunities to thrive, regardless of their college affiliation.”

Hussain and Kozanoglu told Cherwell: “Our priority is to mobilise support for our open letter […] to unite the Oxford community – from undergraduates and postgraduates to alumni and academics – in a collective effort to drive change.” On Monday 29th April, this open letter will be emailed to every student by the SU to “encourage them to sign”.

A spokesperson from the University of Oxford told Cherwell: “the central University provides one of the UK’s most generous packages of financial support through bursaries and scholarships” and that ” the Vice-Chancellor has in the last year also increased the funding available to those affected by the cost of living, through Oxford Financial Assistance.”

The Conference of Colleges told Cherwell: “We welcome discussion of how best to ensure an appropriate level of provision across colleges, regardless of their relative resources, and welcome student feedback.” Hussain and Kozanoglu told Cherwell: “The University has also shown a willingness to listen to student concerns in the past […] we’re confident that these recommendations will be seriously considered.”

While the College Disparities Campaign has acknowledged that “real change will take time” since “college disparities have been an issue for decades”, Hussain and Kozanoglu “are optimistic that […] this report and campaign can mark a turning point.”

SU President-elect Addi Haran told Cherwell: “I look forward to continuing Danial’s work, which is a watershed moment for tackling the disparities between colleges, and will make it a central focus as SU president next year.

Cornmarket Street and Queen Street to undergo ‘extensive repair works’

0

Oxford’s Cornmarket Street and Queen Street are scheduled to undergo “extensive repair works’’. Andrew Gant, head of transport management, announced at Oxfordshire County Council’s full meeting on Tuesday 16 April that the repairs are expected to take place over the summer.

Oxfordshire County Council told Cherwell: “Extensive repair works are planned for both Cornmarket Street and Queen Street in this financial year.” The plans involve the pavements of these streets being replaced and refurbished, which will start on Queen Street, before extending to Cornmarket Street. However, the initiation of the project is also dependent upon the “delivery of specialist materials from abroad”, and as such there is no confirmed start date yet. Overall, the repairs will take between 9 to 12 weeks, subject to external factors and conditions, such as weather. 

The two streets in the historic city centre were described as being “in a shameful state” in the meeting by Susanna Pressel, Councillor for Jericho and Osney. Pressel pointed out in her question to Gant that these streets were ‘’possibly the most prominent and heavily used streets in the county, at least by pedestrians’’, with Gant admitting they were “a bit of a mess’’ in his response. Following his reassurance that plans to repair the streets were underway, Pressel expressed support, stating she was “very glad to hear’’ of the plans.

The announcement follows a series of other maintenance-related works in the city and wider county. Oxford Road, the main road from Banbury to Oxford, shut for two weeks at the beginning of April to undergo sewer repairs. In the rest of Oxfordshire, pothole-related compensation paid out by the council has nearly tripled to over £230,000, with the authorities blaming “perfect pothole-forming conditions’’. The Oxfordshire County Council told Cherwell that: “The budget estimate [for work on Cornmarket Street and Queens Street] is approximately £600,000.”

Gant has also revealed previously that Woodstock Road will be resurfaced in August, pointing out that the repairs would take place “overnight and during the school holidays to reduce [the] impact.” This work would therefore take place back-to-back with the repair works on Queen and Cornmarket Street.

How to be a vegan – and an Oxford student

0

I have a disturbing secret to admit, which might cause people to think I’m crazy, and Katie Hopkins to think I’m smelly: I’m vegan.

I have been vegan for over four years, and I can honestly say I have never found it difficult. Choosing a path of compassion and non-violence feels much easier to me than the alternative, and I firmly believe a vegan lifestyle makes positive contributions towards one’s mental and physical health, both human and non-human welfare, and the environment. What’s more is that one does not need to consume animal products in order to live a healthy life.

I am often reminded how fortunate I am to come from a household that supports my dietary choices, and to have been raised on South Indian cuisine, which can be so effortlessly veganised. I have come to realise this is not the case for my peers from different backgrounds – but university can be the perfect opportunity to assert your independence and choose your own lifestyle.

Despite Oxford being a fairly small city, it has a surprising number of vegan-friendly places. Some recommendations from a certified vegan are: The Coconut Tree, Chick Pea, Delhish Vegan Kitchen, Dosa Park, and of course, Najar’s (they have vegan mayo, ask for it!). A special mention goes to the banana bread French toast at the Handle Bar and the vegan doughnuts at Crosstown. However, I always wish there were more options, especially affordable ones, which perhaps only Najar’s gets points for. 

But what about students who want more than falafel and hummus? Cooking for yourself as a vegan is not nearly as expensive and difficult as people will tell you it is. While realistic meat alternatives can be pretty pricey, many staple sources of protein for vegans, such as beans and lentils, are in fact cheaper than their animal counterparts. Once you’ve secured said affordable vegan goods, a quick google search for ‘easy student vegan recipes’ will show you that you are almost definitely capable of executing a simple dhal or chilli. In fact, there are many cuisines around the world which are not centred around animal products. Ethiopian, Indian, and Mediterranean cuisines, among others, have largely vegan foundations, showing that the idea that one cannot live on a diet that is simultaneously sustainable, nutritious, and tasty, is entirely unfounded.

When it comes to college cuisine, I am privileged to be at St John’s, where hall food is incredibly affordable, and – for the most part – quite nice, with rare (devastatingly bad) exceptions (including a harrowing tempeh dish I still have nightmares about). A special shoutout goes out to the college café, at which the ratio of plant-based to non-vegan options is 2:1, not to mention the fact that there is always at least one vegan cake to choose from. By contrast, although I have generally had good experiences at formals, I have consistently been disappointed by my dessert. I just want to consume a meal that doesn’t inflict pain and suffering on others, whilst still having a sweet treat that looks like what’s in front of everyone sitting around me – is that too much to ask? Apparently so, considering the number of delicately plated fruit platters I’ve reluctantly eaten at the end of a John’s formal. 

My friends make fun of me, I am persistently asked “where on earth do you get your protein from?” and I will, tragically, never have a post-club night kebab. But I will always prefer it to the alternative, and I am proud to be happy, healthy, and 100% plant based.