Wednesday, May 21, 2025
Blog Page 834

Oxford is ‘tourist hell’ in the summer, says Lord Mayor and Labour Councillor

0

It was previously the complaint of privileged students struggling to access some of Oxford’s most famous colleges, but now the city’s former Lord Mayor has complained of “tourist hell” blocking up streets during the summer months.

Mary Clarkson, a Labour city councillor, said more needs to be done to prevent the roads becoming too clogged up, as the city has become “absolute chaos”.

Before heading off to the Edinburgh Fringe, Clarkson said in a tweet she would be glad to take some respite from “the tourist hell of our small city of Oxford”.

She added that as a result, living in the city is “impossible” during the summer.

Speaking to the Oxford Mail, Clarkson said: “There are places it’s particularly bad. On Saturday and Sundays St Giles, which is a dangerous road for cyclists anyway, cycle lanes have been totally blocked by coaches. A lot of their drivers were unable to see cyclists by them. They have been leading tourists into the traffic. You cannot walk along some of the pavements.

“You need to manage the coaches and the tourist groups and it would make everything better if they said ‘you can walk two abreast. When you’re going to give a talk about Oxford, you don’t need to stand in fire exits’.

“I am not saying: ‘don’t have tourists’. I am saying: ‘think about the other residents of the city’. We live in a lovely city and we should expect people to come all year round. The people making money from tourists, they need to think about what they’re doing.”

Her comments come after a senior priest at Oxford’s University Church complained of “disrespectful” tourists who came into the church just to take selfies.

Students have previously taken to the Facebook page Oxfeud to voice their anger at the number of tourists in the city. One contributor echoed Clarkson’s comments by saying the number is “too damn high”.

Another complained of tourists blocking the entrance to their college.

Students sue Oxford for ‘mishandling’ mental health needs

0

Two students are suing Oxford University over alleged mishandling of their mental health needs.

Catherine Dance, a 24-year-old Jesus College Law Graduate, is suing the university for “psychological harm” and a year’s loss of earnings, after completing her Finals a year late due to mental health difficulties.

Dance, who was diagnosed with chronic anxiety and depression in 2009, claims she was forced to rusticate for a year from her degree, after Jesus refused to allow her to sit collections in a private room using a laptop.

Dance told the Telegraph that Jesus’ decision meant: “I was one year out of a graduate job, plus the emotional damage and psychological harm”.

Jesus College denies the allegations, saying it made appropriate adjustments for Dance’s condition. The college added that it does not believe that requiring collections be sat in a large hall and be handwritten discriminates against students with anxiety or depression. College officials say they repeatedly encouraged Ms Dance to seek counselling.

Another student, Sophie Spector, who has dyslexia, ADHD and OCD, is suing the University over claims that staff at Balliol pressurised her to take medical leave from her PPE degree. Spector said Balliol refused her an extended deadline on essays.

Chris Fry, a disability rights lawyer who is representing Ms Dance and Ms Spector, said that the increase in lawsuits against universities is a result of students becoming more aware of their rights.

Fry told the Telegraph that, due to the 2010 Equality Act: “This is a generation of students who grew up with enforceable rights … It was rare to hear of anybody looking to enforce their rights in that way [before 2010], since then, we’ve had a constant stream of enquiries from students.”

He added that since the 2010 act, he has handled more than a 100 cases of students seeking to sue their university over discrimination allegations. With most students claiming that the “reasonable adjustments” for mental illnesses required by the act were not made by their respective universities.

He suggested the increase in annual tuition fees to £9,000 was also a factor driving the growth in lawsuits. “It’s clear to see why these students who need reasonable adjustments are not prepared to be pushed around or ignored,” he told the Telegraph.

Oxford University said it does not comment on legal proceedings, however it said it takes mental health issues “extremely seriously”.

A university spokesperson said: “We encourage all students in need to use our free and confidential counselling service run by professionally trained staff. Each college has its own welfare team which works very closely with the University’s Disability Advisory Service to put in place appropriate provision so that students can manage their studies successfully and are not disadvantaged by their disability.”

Data from the Higher Education Statistics Agency shows that the number of students dropping out of university with mental health problems has more than trebled in recent years. 1,180 students experiencing mental health problems left university early in 2014-15, the most recent year in which data was available – representing a 210% increase from 380 in 2009-10.

There’s more to prehistory than cave drawings and diplodocuses

0

I’m sure I’m not the only person whose experience of history in school was the two World Wars, and a cheeky splash of the Tudor Court thrown in for good measure. For the lucky ones among us, the American War of Independence might have gotten a quick look in. But in any case, we certainly never looked back further than the Battle of Hastings in 1066. ‘Prehistory’, that period before we started regularly recording things, has had an even worse ride. I would love to say that I compensated for this dearth by ardently researching the huge swathe of pre-Roman history in my spare time, but I have to be honest – my perception of civilisation’s emergence is pretty much the dinosaurs dying out and being replaced by the Roman Empire with next to nothing in between, and I’m fairly certain that I’m not alone in this gaping chasm of ignorance. Fortunately, a solution is present. Either, cut yourself off from the rest of humanity and spend a few years of your life meticulously researching anthropology and ethnography until you’ve filled the gaps in your knowledge. Or, read Sapiens. The choice is yours.

“A brief history of humankind” is the flippant subtitle of Sapiens, Yuval Noah Harari’s ground breaking best seller, and yet Sapiens achieves everything it sets out to in this self-aware description, detailing more than 7,000 years of human history in just under 500 pages. Harari approaches this feat by considering in turn each of the major revolutions in the history of humanity and considering their consequences for the development of our species. If you immediately thought of the Industrial Revolution as well, fear not – you are not the only one experiencing horrific flashbacks to GCSE, but rest assured, Harari’s approach is simple and informative without ever being patronising, a significant achievement for a book that has to simplify some incredibly complex anthropological ideas for a wide-ranging lay audience.

Harari’s first stop is the cognitive revolution, so called because it saw the birth of the homo sapien as a species that thought, imagined and told stories in a way that other species simply did not. 100,000 years ago there were at least six human species inhabiting the earth contemporaneously, known as the ‘early hominids’. The prototypical evolutionary diagram in the back of a biology class does not account for the fact that these different types of human lived alongside each other rather than growing into one single species. Harari argues that what established the Homo Sapien as the dominant force was its capacity for fiction. From unitive narratives like religion to social narratives that functioned as gossip, he suggests that our capacity to interact, tell stories and socialise is what enabled us to thrive as a species, and that everything, in essence, is a story – from the thought that going on holiday abroad is a luxury, to the thought that human rights should exist.

From the cognitive revolution, Harari goes on to look at the agricultural revolution and the scientific revolution, working all the way up until the present day. From the emphasis he places on the plight of domesticated animals, it may be unsurprising that Harari is a vegan, and his consideration of factory farming as “perhaps the worst crime in history” will certainly provide food for thought (if you’ll pardon the pun).

His exploration of capitalism is also erudite and thought provoking, and his consistent use of topical metaphors and images (comparing, for example, the reimagining of wine as the blood of Christ in Christian ceremonies to the invention of Peugeot) are engaging and useful.

With celebrity fans including Barack Obama, Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerberg, it is a credit to Harari that Sapiens has been translated into more than 30 languages worldwide since its original release in Hebrew in 2011, and was a Sunday Times Number One Bestseller. With the sequel, Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow, having just been released, there is no book I can recommend more highly to provoke thought, make you reassess your perception of human supremacy, and most importantly, teach you that there’s more to prehistory than cave drawings and some diplodocuses.

New Sainsbury’s set to open on St Aldates

0

Christ Church students will be able to access their new “state-of-the-art” accommodation block on Queen’s Street at the start of next term – located above a new Sainsbury’s Local store, which is set to open this month.

The new accommodation building, developed by Reef Estates, will include 133 ensuite rooms, kitchens, and common rooms, along with a cinema room and gym in the basement. The rooms will be above several new shops, including the Sainsbury’s Local with its storefront on St Aldates. Though the majority of the rooms will be used by Christ Church, a portion of the accommodation – 54 rooms – may be let to other colleges.

Work on the site began last year, following two years of discussions regarding the building’s design. The architecture had input from Oxford Civic Society and conservation officers at the city council.

“It’s a state-of-the-art building for students with nice kitchens and common rooms, and a cinema room in the basement,” said Jacob Russell, head of design at Reef Estates.

“Some of rooms have fantastic views over the skyline and Christ Church students will be right in the centre of the city, but not too far away from the college.”

Speaking about the project, Labour city councillor Colin Cook said: “It will be an asset to Queen Street and a good location for students to move into for the new term.”

Work at the site is expected to finish on 21 August, with Sainsbury’s opening by the end of the month. The accommodation will be ready for students to move in at the beginning of Michaelmas.

The work’s completion comes in the midst of significant changes to the city centre, with the opening of the new Westgate shopping centre due on 24 October.

Our Ladies of Perpetual Succour review – ‘Fizzing with energy and bravado’

0

Our Ladies of Perpetual Succour is a cacophonous coming of age story, complete with fireworks, smoke machines and audaciously funny one liners, but it is the six main characters themselves that truly make the performance.

It is incredibly refreshing to see female characters who are raucous, rude and badly behaved, while simultaneously human and layered. Slut shaming and stereotypes would have us believe that being sex-obsessed, drunk and disorderly precludes tenderness and complexity, but Our Ladies shows these impulses authentically and inextricably combined in the urgency of youth. We see drunken honesty provoke self discovery, shopping inspire intimate moments of friendship, and sex pursued in order to live life to the full.

The girls are fizzing with energy and bravado, bursting into song and embodying myriad other characters as they recount their hectic 24 hours in Edinburgh. But they are also each dealing individually with complex and often difficult life experiences, from illness to sexuality, from poverty to pregnancy to grief. The quieter moments of the play, where characters talk through their experiences, often to one other girl, or directly to the audience, are by far the most moving and memorable, often adding explanation and depth to their more rowdy behaviour.

What can be disturbing is how the play’s happy-go-lucky attitude takes amorality a little too far, with very dubious sexual consent played off as comedy on more than one occasion. At one point, a dangerously stoned girl “takes one for the team”, having sex with an adult man as payment for drugs. In moments like this, the play’s pleasing scorn for the excessive moralising the girls face, from nuns at school, parents and society at large, seems to become something darker, where the outrageous must be accepted as fun, however damaging something may be in reality.

Ultimately, the play addresses the importance (and limits) of one great night of freedom. It is a joyful experience to see these girls so unfettered, juxtaposed with the rigid expectations of their strict Catholic school. That fact that this night of debauchery is enabled by a school trip to a choir competition is tickling in itself, as is the contrast between their initial angelic choral singing and the foul-mouthed chaos that subsequently ensues. It is also moving as we come to understand the importance of this night for each individual character: what they, sometimes naively, hope will come from it, or what the night unexpectedly helps them understand about themselves. Bold, jocular Fionulah’s frank introspection (Dawn Sievewright) and gradual self acceptance is particularly beautiful to watch.

In Orla’s case (Isis Hainsworth), her illness makes a tragedy of the common realisation that culturally-loaded experiences like having sex for the first time are not necessarily life-changing. She doesn’t have time for her life to change slowly, as significant experiences come randomly and unpursued. Though less desperately, the other girls act on a similar impulse: the rarity and specialness of this day of complete freedom, in the midst of lives restricted by circumstance, means that it must be enjoyed and risked and lived to the full.

Our Ladies is essentially the story of six teenagers on an all-day piss up, but the significance of that to these particular characters, at this moment in their lives, cannot be ignored.

‘Road’ review – ‘A formidable fusion of poetry, movement and humour’

0

Road begins with the crescendo of Judy Garland’s enduring song of hope and desperation: “birds fly over the rainbow, why then oh why can’t I.” This sense of escapism and desire for a better life predominates throughout Jim Cartwright’s gritty yet lyrical portrait of economic hardship.

Set in Lancashire at the height of Thatcher’s Britain, Road gives us an insight into the lives of the residents of an undefined road over the course of one night. It debuted at the Royal Court in 1986 to great acclaim. Bringing it back now to austerity Britain is an unusual move for a theatre that celebrates new writing and rarely revives plays. But it works. If you look beyond the shoulder pads, elaborate hairstyles and 80s hits, the depth of disenchantment resonates today. In fact director John Tiffany (of Harry Potter and the Cursed Child fame) cites this stagnancy as a key driver for the revival “It was written from a place where it didn’t feel like it could get any worse…and actually it’s got worse for people.”

But for all the frank despair – “fucking long life in’it” is a common refrain – the lyricism of the writing and the pervasive music conflate to affirm a latent sense of hope and striving for better – not accepting that this is ‘it’. In one particularly potent moment, the drunken narrator Scullery (Lemn Sissay) takes a shopping trolley as his dancing partner to Tchaikovsky’s Swan Lake. Although the 80s dance routines between scenes sometimes lacked crescendo, music is used skillfully throughout the play, bringing a sense of denouement at the end of the piece. A cringingly awkward drunken double-date was revolutionized by the playing of the entirety of Otis Redding’s ‘Try a Little Tenderness’ as though this was all that was needed to lessen the burden of trying times.

Chloe Lamford’s design adds to this sense of isolation in the characters’ lives – they are delivered up through the floor to tell their story in a grungy glass box; a display-case prison acting as an echo chamber for their thoughts. Sometimes moments of overly chummy audience interaction detract from this voyeuristic feeling. The original production’s promenade format would have lent itself better to this attempt at interactive theatre but as it stands I would have preferred that the seclusion be maintained.

Faye Marsay and Shane Zaza are convincing and arresting as Joey and Clare – a couple on a suicidal hunger strike, portraying the innate human desire for more than “work, work, small wages, Death”. They emphatically admonish our trepidation in confronting this: being “frightened to sniff the wind for fear it’ll blow your brain upside down.” The detail of Mark Hadfield’s performance is captivating in his portrayal of a lonely man evoking his earlier life when there “were so many jobs”. Game of Thrones’ fans will be unsurprised by Michelle Fairley’s incredible abilities, showcased best through her tragic portrait of Brenda, the withered alcoholic scrounging for a pound from her daughter and the poignantly hilarious Helen seducing a paralytic soldier who proceeds to unceremoniously vomit into a plate of chips.

Road is an outstanding fusion of excellent poetry, movement and humour which, together, offer a portrait of life beset by escapism and economic difficulty. If the transitions between vignettes seem clunky at times this can be primarily put down to their juxtaposition with the depth of emotion conveyed as each individual character tells their story. It is a formidable play which sharply portrays the struggles of ordinary people as accurately now as it did when it was first written. I can only hope that its bleak relevance diminishes over time.

Road, Royal Court, London, until 19 September.

‘STOP’ at the Fringe review – “it deserves an award for excellence in storytelling”

0

According to Andrew Lloyd Webber, musical theatre is losing its momentum in the UK, but STOP could just be about to buck that trend. The recently-graduated duo of Annabel Mutale Reed (book and lyrics) and Leo Munby (music) has found an impressive sweet spot by writing a concept musical that deals with one of the most pressing and universal issues of our time: a crisis of mental illness.

Waiting together at a magical bus stop, a lawyer, personal trainer, dancer, and student are forced to stop and face their internal battles. Their circumstantial relationships tease out each unique story through a series of monologues and musical numbers that are sensitively performed by an ensemble of just four actors. The unashamedly British wit of the script lures audiences into a false comfort which is then thwarted by a powerfully emotional final quarter.

Although sometimes lacking in sustained physical characterisation, all the actors give competent individual performances, as well as pulling together for exquisitely harmonised group numbers. Martha, a black lawyer played by Mutale Reed, is perhaps the most complex character of all. Her struggle to come to terms with her husband’s depression, her pregnancy, her alcoholism, and everyday racism culminates in a truly heart-wrenching performance of You Matter Today. The song verges on breaking the fourth wall by offering a message of hope and encouragement, however the show’s direction and writing evades over-egging the sentiment by maintaining an entirely naturalistic portrayal of a mother empowering her child. Poignant moments like this are plentiful in every character.

Credit must also go to Gemma Lowcock, the only non-original cast member, who stepped into the role of Chloe with marked ease. In the new version, Lowcock not only conveys Chloe’s bipolar type two more clearly and sensitively, but exploits Munby and Reed’s intelligent structure. Chloe, with her colour-coded revision cards, glues the hard-hitting stories together through endearing friendliness and unassuming humour, all while exhibiting the versatility of Munby’s incredible, infectious score.

Advice, however, from an out-of-date composer whose ego could fill all 1,200 pages of Les Miserables should be consumed with caution; Claude-Michel Schönberg, with whom the show has been workshopped, has done the show few favours since January. If this was a plot-driven, lengthy epic I could understand why Munby would use a recitative “inspired by the theatrical language of Les Mis and Miss Saigon”, but the additional underscore in the first half and the recitative were ill-fitted to the subtlety of the script, and became tiresome by the end. In what is also quite static staging, the underscore distracts from the compelling story-telling of the script. I can’t help feeling the show could be even better if Munby and Reed stuck to their original instincts and trusted their remarkable talent.

The production also needs ironing out, with unnatural direction of movement and incomplete sound design (a soundscape, for example, would really enhance the setting), but this was likely down to unfamiliarity with the space. The simplicity should nonetheless be commended. A minimalist set and production assures that the characters and their stories remain at the forefront. And that is really where this production excels; STOP is a show that creates conversation and reinstates stories as the currency of human exchange. “Excellence isn’t a duty”, but boy, STOP deserves an award for excellence in story-telling.

 

STOP, Venue 58, until 28 August.

New College bursar slams Louise Richardson’s “grossly excessive” pay

0

The New College bursar has launched an attack on the “grossly excessive” pay of Oxford’s Vice Chancellor, Louise Richardson, and that of the University’s senior management team.

In a letter to the Financial Times, David Palfreyman stated that it was difficult to find “value for money in return” for the increasing pay of Oxford’s senior academics, when it had entailed little “improvement in governance”.

Palfreyman levelled much of his criticism against the salary of the Vice Chancellor (VC), Louise Richardson, who is paid a salary of £350,000 per year, rising to £410,000 if pensions are included.

Palfreyman, who has been he New bursar since 1988, stated that Oxford’s VC had once been the “cheapest…in the land” until about 2000.

David Palfreyman, New College bursar (Image: New College)

He dismissed comparisons between the wages of university VCs and those working in banking as “silly”.

“No sane person could dispute that top bankers are egregiously overpaid, but their daft pay is no reason for VCs to be put on the same gravy train, albeit in a third-class compartment,” the bursar wrote.

Figures released in January showed Louise Richardson was the third highest-paid VC in the UK, and that on average, the VCs of Russell Group universities took home six per cent more than they did two years ago.

It was also revealed in March that Oxford had the highest number of staff earning over £100,000 per year.

A spokesperson for the University said: “Oxford is the world’s highest-ranked university” and that “the remuneration of the vice-chancellor reflects this.”

Has football finally sold its soul to money?

0

For the £198 million that Paris Saint-Germain parted with to meet Neymar’s release clause, you could purchase thirteen Alan Shearers, over a trillion Freddos or one-tenth of a British parliamentary majority. £198 million is also the cost of covering the entire city of Barcelona in spaghetti. For Neymar to be worth his weight in a commodity, gold would not do; instead he would have to be made out of plutonium, which costs $4,000 per gram.

But the face value price is not the whole story: when agent fees, the contract’s value and other expenses are considered, the cost of this 25-year-old footballer’s transfer from Barcelona is closer to half a billion pounds sterling. This leads anyone to question whether the beautiful game has finally gone mad, whether this sort of spending is sustainable, and how any human being in any profession could be worth such an eye-wateringly gigantic sum of money.

But in the context of this summer transfer window, Neymar is worth it. Romelu Lukaku, a Chelsea reject who has had two fruitful seasons at Everton, is valued at £75 million by Manchester United. Goalkeepers Jordan Pickford and Ederson have been snapped up this summer for fees equal to or in excess of £30 million; both have never represented their countries at a senior level. Is Neymar two-and-a-half times as good as Lukaku, or seven times as good as Pickford or Ederson? Undoubtedly.

The reputable CIES football observatory rates Neymar as the most valuable footballer on the planet: they have his market cost at €210.7 million, which is almost the same as Neymar’s release clause (€222 million). He is an incredibly prolific goal scorer and supremely skilful footballer with pace, creativity and intelligence. In his short career he has already won La Liga twice, the Champions League once, and established himself as the best Brazilian footballer on the planet (no mean feat, if history is anything to go by). He is also a commercial godsend for the club, with his easy media style, virtuoso performances on the pitch and well-known name meaning that he is practically a brand; he will generate revenue for PSG as soon as he arrives in France.

Yet all this talk of numbers makes one question whether football has become simply a data-driven sport. Today, footballers are judged by their coaches, ex-footballers on the television and the armchair pundits at home by how many metres they run during 90 minutes, how many chances they create, the number of interceptions they make, and so forth. The transfer window itself has become a tournament, presided over by the effervescent Jim White and capturing as much interest as any ordinary Premier League weekend. Ordinary fans are priced out of the game, where a season ticket at the Emirates Stadium costs around £1000, and where you cannot watch Champions League football for free. In the last few years, the big wigs of the sport, Sepp Blatter and all his cronies, have been rumbled for corruption on a frankly disgusting level.

It’s starkly clear that there is too much money in football. It has become, whether us fans like it or not, a multi-trillion pound business, a market with a life of its own, where a pre-game pint and pie costs more than a match-day ticket should be sold at. It is no longer the working man’s game. This is what Neymar represents, and whilst he might be worth it when you run the numbers, the soul of football was sold long before Neymar traded the best club in the world for a Parisian upstart outfit to line his wallet and soothe his ego.

Fringe 2017: ‘Radio’ review – “yet another gleaming success for Sunscreen Productions”

0

What did you do last night? Six students sit in their kitchen after a boozy house dinner on their last day of university and piece together what they can remember from the night before. Their hazy memories allow them to recall some events, but no one can remember why exactly the police are imminently due to arrive, or who called them. As the play progresses, the radio in the background becomes more and more prominent, manipulating the characters’ discussions almost to the point where it seems to be contributing to events. Friendships and romances become more and more strained in lieu of this uncertainty, and the rising tension culminates in the discovery of an incident from the night before… and the police knocking at the door.

Archie Thomson’s debut play is wickedly funny, punctured with engaging dialogue and witty comments throughout. He light-heartedly explores many of the insecurities and fears that all students face at the end of university, ranging from relationship dilemmas to career uncertainty, and the huge variety of paths available for young people to go down is reflected in the range of different characters. Thomson is critical of all his characters – be that Tom, with his economics degree, or Sam, who has spent the last 3 years working in a pub. At the end of the play you are left with the nostalgic feeling that the only thing holding the group together was university itself.

The characters are all based on exaggerated student archetypes that are immediately recognisable to anyone who has ever shared a house. Steph is the hilariously socially awkward software engineer, Paul is the laid-back Mancunian, and Bee is the left-wing feminist to name just three. It’s clear the cast worked together closely to develop these characters as each one has a flair of originality that is often missing from other plays: Steph’s mannerisms, Tom’s arrogance, and Paul’s charm all heighten the interactions of the group, and prevent the archetypes becoming hackneyed. The viewer is left with a great sense of familiarity with each of the characters, despite the performance lasting under an hour.

Radio proves to be yet another gleaming success for Sunscreen Productions who have consistently put on critically acclaimed performances over the last couple of years. After selling out the Chelsea Theatre, I am excited to see how the next few performances at Paradise Studios go, and am looking forward to seeing what they will produce next.

Radio, Paradise in Augustine (venue 152), 9.05pm, until 19th August (except 13th).