Saturday 25th April 2026
Blog Page 866

How to: ace the vac

0

A quick glance at social media would suggest that the vac is an exhilarating rollercoaster ride through a cornucopia of Instagramming, Snapchatting, Tweeting, and texting. If you haven’t spent the whole time inundating your followers with pictures of the beach you’re sitting on – the temperature and time of day included in a cute colourful graphic – who even are you?

Adjusting to being back home can be challenging for all of us, but fake it till you make it on social media and you’re already more than halfway there. After all, if others can’t see that you’re enjoying the vac, are you really? Isn’t it obvious that you’re having more fun than everyone else if you’re posting multiple times a day about your exploits? And might I add, you’re definitely having more fun if you’re posting with multiple people. Grab your friends or indeed the stranger next to you, and take a selfie with them. I mean who cares if you haven’t spoken to them in months (or haven’t even met them)? This is all about making your social calendar look as though it was comprehensively planned months in advance.

A golden rule for making proper use of the vac is that every visit to a café or art gallery must also be recorded for posterity. The whole world wants to see you drinking coffee from a jam jar – so give the people what they want. Be sure to post pics of every pumpkin spiced latte, served in a rustic mason jar, just in case anyone hadn’t realised you were visiting an edgy coffee shop in a trendy corner of East London. This is to conceal the fact you’ve actually spent most of the vac in your bedroom. Alone. In an irrelevant part of the South West of England, where the closest you’ve come to human contact is the local scarecrow. So much of Oxford is about keeping up appearances, and this is never truer than during the Vac.

Don’t forget that despite only ever venturing as far as East London, you’ll need to grit your teeth and smile as you tell your friends you went to Tenerife (with snapchat stories to support the claim). That is only for them to respond coolly by saying that they’d been to Elevenerife – how very expected, that others would be so effortlessly good at maintaining appearances.

It seems the general competitive vibe of Oxford life applies to the vacs as well. Therefore, you’ll also want to have at least 10 internships lined up over the vac. The beauty of internships and vacation schemes is that when I tell people I’m going for them, it gives the impression that I am actually prepared career-wise (spoiler: I’m not). It also has the simultaneous effect of making those you tell feel so completely demoralised.

Only for you to be able to reflate them by telling them how little vac work you’ve done in comparison to them, how unprepared for collections you are, and how they will of course inevitably ace those exams. This is, of course, a lie. Every spare hour, outside those spent sipping coffee, sunning yourself in Tenerife, or sweating over a Deloitte desk has doubtless been spent swatting for those exams. These people will inevitably end up deflated when you’re the one that aces those collections. Keep the pretences up, and not only will the likes come rolling in, but the grades too.

It is obvious that through the wonders of social media, it is completely possible to be seen to be enjoying the vac. This is despite the reality that you cannot wait for 0th week to arrive, and to be able to return to the library – where you can reuse the excuse that your tutor is a malevolent monster destined on destroying your social life. But, for now, don’t let this article tear you away from that mince pie you’re about to Instagram. I’d hate to be the one to disappoint your fans.

Christmas through the imagination of Tolkien

0
© The Tolkien Estate Ltd 1976
© The Tolkien Estate Ltd 1976

Tolkien is perhaps best known for his astonishing ability to create vivid and engrossing worlds in his novels The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings. Having inspired so many from his home in Oxford, a Bodleian exhibition in 2018 titled Tolkien: Maker of Middle-Earth will reveal a whole new world Tolkien created for his children.

Christmas already carries a whole range of mythos and Tolkien, in painstakingly detailed letters from Father Christmas to his children, deepened and strengthened this world with playful stories and beautiful illustrations. The attention to detail of his stories, introducing characters such as Santa’s clumsy Polar Bear helper, shows his instinctive desire to build fictional worlds.

© The Tolkien Estate Ltd 1976

Curator of the exhibition, Catherine McIlwaine, told Cherwell that it will reveal “a side of Tolkien that many people don’t know about”. As the father of four children, Tolkien shows his dedication to sparking the imagination of children in these letters spanning 23 years, even including references to Hornby toys, a particular favourite of his sons.

The letters also reflect Tolkien’s long development of Middle Earth — Christmas gnomes become elves as time progresses. One letter, written in 1932, around the time that Tolkien finished his first draft of The Hobbit for his good friend C.S. Lewis, features thieving orcs, ransacking Santa’s grotto and stealing his toys.

© The Tolkien Trust 2012

Tolkien’s world building was fueled by an underlying desire to create a national mythology for Great Britain. “Tolkien felt that Britain was deprived of a national mythology by its invaders”, McIlwaine told Cherwell. As a professor of Anglo-Saxon studies in Oxford, Tolkien’s reverence of Beowulf as “the first great English piece of literature” shows his obsession with English mythos. Of note to scholars of English literature in Oxford University, an original type script of Tolkien’s translation of Beowulf from 1926, featuring handwritten notes, will be on display too.

Although McIlwaine notes how Tolkien sits “outside the literary canon”, she told Cherwell of his ‘influence’ on all fantasy works. Fan letters from great writers including a 19 year old Terry Pratchett will also be on display. In this regard, Tolkien’s project can be regarded as a success, from Harry Potter to Game of Thrones, works inspired by Tolkien’s English mythos have taken the world by storm just as much as Homer, Virgil, or Chanson de Gestes.

All this and more will be displayed at the Bodleian Library exhibit from June 1st 2018 until October. The Exhibition will be accompanied by a book titled ‘Tolkien: Maker of Middle Earth’ published on 1 June 2018.

‘Revival’ review – mature and compelling as ever

1

Months of teasers stacked on top of years of anticipation came to a climax on Friday when Eminem finally dropped his new album Revival. His ninth studio album sprawls across 19 tracks that range from rock and gospel to pop and the foundation of barbed hip hop, aiming to boast something for everyone. The titular shift in Eminem that is realised in this album was first glimpsed by stolid Stans when he sported a tougher look in the form of a gruff beard, obscuring the youthful mischief of the self-professed ‘Criminal’ who defined the noughties. Now, at 45, Eminem is struggling with that legacy. “But how do you keep up the pace/and the hunger pangs once you’ve won the race?” Eminem queries. As someone who has constantly had to prove something, he wonders how to prove himself when his name is already etched in the annals.

Revival marks a more mature phase as Eminem can no longer find fuel in attacking his Mum, Kim and Moby. Instead he delves into unlikely alcoves; from Trump takedowns and self-doubt to the remorseful and reconciliatory. He still approaches rap as a presentation of his immensely contradictory character and the psychological conflict it gives rise to, something which only seems to be exacerbated by the Eminem/Slim Shady/Marshall Mathers split persona. Eminem notes in ‘Framed’, a nod to the Shady horrorcore rap of Relapse, “three personalities burstin’ out of me, please, beware”. While this complexity is compelling, it can at times seem contradictory as he oscillates between comedy, tragedy and fury sometimes within the space of a sole song. Yet, it is refreshing to be confronted with wracked insecurities and concerns as opposed to the clichéd boasts of wealth and women that punctuate a lot of contemporary rap.

Beyoncé’s haunting voice opens the album in ‘Walk on Water’, a largely beat-free track that is scattered with sounds of paper being crumpled and expletives that stress Eminem’s faltering confidence. “Kids look to me as a god, this is retarded” he reflects, tormented by the dizzying expectations of fans, expectations Eminem only propped up with messianic tracks such as ‘Rap God’. On a first listen, Revival seemed underwhelming. Yet, you can’t help but wonder whether this is owing to the four Eminem-empty years that preceded it, or the exorbitantly high mark Eminem has set for himself, something ‘Walk on Water’ reveals he is acutely conscious of. The album grows better the longer you immerse yourself in it, owing to the provocative gift of its writer. He is still a consummate wordsmith, with an astounding command of narrative and rhyme with dizzying wordplay that continues to jump out even on the second or third listen. Convoluted double entendres (“Sorry if I’m being graphic, but I’m stiff as a statue/You sat on a shelf, I feel like I’m a bust/Maybe I’m ahead of myself”) show how he continues to delight in the mischievous complexities language can offer.

It is in Eminem’s clever, quick and verbose masterstroke ‘Offended’ that his impressive technical ability reaches its peak. The verbal fireworks explain and exemplify his skill, with each polysyllabic surge cementing it. The track culminates in a frenetic and blistering spectacle of speed, akin to the supersonic passage of ‘Rap God’, that similarly aims for the record books. At this point in Revival Eminem seems to have a resurgence of confidence, as he charges into ‘Nowhere Fast’ blasting “I feel sorry for this beat/Sympathy pains for this track”, almost assaulting the beat with aggression. Kehlani provides the atmospheric chorus that is dispersed across the Eminem features, leaving listeners unsure whether collaborators such as Ed Sheeran and Alicia Keys are a transparent attempt to garner chart success, particularly given the fact they seem like people Eminem would have looked on with derision a decade ago.

The political anger of Eminem’s freestyle assault on Donald Trump earlier in the year is translated into ‘Like Home’ and ‘Untouchable’. While Eminem previously incorporated a political discussion into ‘Mosh’ and ‘White America’, the sustained political narrative of these tracks is unprecedented. It seems that Eminem is aligning his own revival with that he wishes to see in the American political climate as he calls “Someone get this Aryan a sheet/Time to bury him, so tell him to prepare to get impeached”. The use of the reversed American flag on the album cover and the description of the “star-spangled spiel” in ‘Untouchable’ demonstrate Eminem’s current apathy for respecting the flag and anthem when it seems to offer no respect in return. Eminem moves from commenting on modern politics to the modern rap game in ‘Believe’ and ‘Chloraseptic’. Eminem’s take on the modern trap beat in the former could initially elicit a wince; it is simply too harsh a departure from his norm, conjuring up more of a Migos mood than a Slim Shady one. It seems the slow tempo is an attempt to overcome the critiques of his choppy flow he mentions in ‘Walk on Water’. Yet, a high point emerges in ‘Chloraseptic’ from the detailed Shady description of how he will kill the likes of limp mumble rappers with the wire of a notebook filled with their weak rhymes.

Eminem has no qualms about exploring the poisonous relationships he first narrated in ‘Love the Way You Lie’ and ‘Space Bound’, with the self-lacerating narratives of ‘River’, ‘Need Me’ and ‘Tragic Endings’ recreating such harmful pairings.  Yet, as ever, it is when Eminem explicitly turns the spotlight on himself that the effect is most dramatic. When Eminem raps “But I’m sorry Kim” in ‘Bad Husband’ you can’t help but sit up, realising the track is an apology to his twice ex-wife Kim Mathers, similar to the ‘Headlights’ apology to his mother in The Marshall Mathers LP 2. Eminem’s turbulent relationship with his high school sweetheart has been a subplot to his career, provoking some of his most violent material, and so it is astonishing to tangibly detect how dramatically he has altered.

Revival truly saves the best for last, finishing in a remarkable spectacle of raw emotion. The closing one-two punch of ‘Castle’ and ‘Arose’ again shows how Eminem is most arresting when he goes deep within himself. ‘Castle’ is told as a series of letters to Eminem’s daughter Hailie, complete with the background sound effects of pencil scribbling on paper, reminiscent of ‘Stan’. Eminem jumps from his perspective before her birth, before moving to the height of his fame, and lastly to the moment he overdosed on methadone in 2007: at the track’s close the silence is punctuated by the sound of pills being swallowed and Eminem collapsing. What follows is one of Eminem’s most powerful and poignant songs to date. The reality of the moment in hospital spills out as he recounts how “I go to make a fist, but I can’t make one, I’m frozen stiff/I yell, but nothing comes out, I’m crying inside, I shout”. The album title is strongly felt here as the beat switches back to ‘Castle’ once Eminem insists “to rewrite a mistake, I’m rewinding the tape”. Compared to the close of the previous track, ‘Arose’ ends with the sound of a toilet flushing.

Eminem is often defiantly vulnerable, ready to point out his own failings before others have the chance, as shown in the climactic rap battle of 8 Mile. The emotion and power of Revival are largely owing to his willingness to pick the scabs of his pressures and insecurities while remaining linguistically agile. After all, who doesn’t love a good geometry pun: “This love triangle left us in a wreck, tangled”.

The culture of Homecoming, from a student’s eyes

0

The return home is an essential element of any adventure story. After all the action has been played out, the protagonist must return to where they came from. Homecoming is a common experience for all people this time of year. For many students it is the first time one returns from the eight weeks of crushing neurosis that is Michaelmas, as lifeless and bedraggled as Coleridge’s homebound Ancient Mariner. For some, returning home may be a comforting experience but for others it is all parts as confusing and horrifying as the adventure itself.

The journey home in some stories goes unexamined, pushed to epilogues and closing scenes, but some of the most riveting culture focuses on the journey home alone. One of the earliest cultural works ever, Homer’s ‘Odyssey’, is at its heart about homecoming, this year’s groundbreaking ‘Twin Peaks: The Return’ likewise.

The journey home can be as treacherous as the adventure itself, not through logistical challenges but haunted by psychological trauma of what one returns from. Mistakes and missed opportunities, lost friends and new enemies replay in our minds as we think about the term that was. Odysseus confronted his demons in the underworld, coming face to face with those he left behind at Troy, the Ancient Mariner is haunted by the ghosts of his crewmembers, an albatross upon his neck weighs the fatal mistake he made.

Returning home may be like waking from a dream, as one awakens our brains must adjust to the reality we are confronted with. No longer are meals prepared for us, all destinations a brisk stroll away and, like Dale Cooper, we must learn to act human again after living in a fantasy land for so long. We must wrap our term into a narrative bow, with a defined ending and beginning, just like Odysseus on Scheria, when the truth may not be so neat.

However, home itself can often present the greatest challenge of all. The returned student is a stranger in a familiar land, both the student and their home forever changed. No one leaves an Oxford term unchanged, the onslaught of deadlines and rough nights leaving a new scar every time. Having caught up to the speed of light pace of life crammed into eight weeks, a returned student finds the comfort of home, agrarian or urban, to be viscous and dull.

The homebound student fears that home has changed against their wishes too. Betrayal hides around every corner, where friends forget and family patronise. Just as Bilbo Baggins returns to find his home auctioned off, one fears returning home to find all they cherished — friendships, stomping grounds, and heirlooms — thrown away. One may turn to paranoia, attacking friends and family, as Odysseus attacks his unwanted guests, in an act of unreasonable cruelty.

More realistically however, home will most likely become a nameless place. As the years go by and people move on, architecture and landscape may remain but its soul will slip away. Dale Cooper returns to Twin Peaks after 25 years only to find that everyone he was searching for has disappeared, how long until you will find the same?

Returning home is a minefield, full of trauma both at what you return from and what you return to. Talk to your diaspora of Oxford friends, find culture that depicts the experience of homecoming and take comfort that you are not alone: homecoming is a nightmare.

Jingle hell: a Grinch’s guide to Christmas

0

Ah, Christmas time.

“Excellent,” the shopkeepers say, “Tis’ the season for spending!”

“Hurray!” the children cheer, “Santa is coming!”

“Oh Christ,” every other ordinary person utters, “Let the complete obliteration of my dignity commence.”

The road to the New Year is a long one, littered with obstacles and paper hats. But fear not – help is at hand in the form of these six survival tips.

1. RELATIVES. The tinny throb of a Ford Fiesta spells the imminent arrival of undesirable individuals. The addition of little people into the mix adds a new dimension of difficulty. Not only do they have an unappealing habit of shooting fluids out of their facial orifices, but if you haven’t bought them what they want (i.e. a life-size plush Harry Styles or various items of foam weaponry) then the turd will hit the suspended air-filter in the most spectacular fashion.

How to survive – Resist the urge to hit little Henry over the head with his new hardback edition of Hairy Maclary and give him a giant Toblerone – they work wonders in stopping tantrums. If seated between your partner’s parents at the dinner table, take extra caution with the Christmas crackers – you run the risk of chronic elbow injury and blinding your future in-laws with a rogue spinning top or stencil set.

2. CHRISTMAS TREES. Piles of pine needles all over the carpet, which then find their way into socks and are inhaled by dogs, may lead to mild canine congestion.

How to survive – Feel no shame in rockin’ around your Homebase acrylic Nordic Spruce. If you do plump for the real deal though, disposing of it can be a nightmare. Either burn the bushy bastard or plant it neatly in your garden…then Rex can continue putting presents under it all year round.

3. THE QUEEN’S SPEECH. What’s with this? You’re just tucking into your roasted road-kill from Lidl when this regal party-pooper turns up.

How to survive – This one’s easy: don’t watch it. As soon as you hear the first parps of the royal fanfare, make a majestic dive for the ‘mute’ button. It’s also worth noting that Channel 4 broadcast their ‘alternative speech’ each year. Previous speakers have included Edward Snowden, Sharon Osbourne and Ebola survivor William Pooley, i.e. people who’ve actually done stuff rather than lolled about in a pastel two-piece feeding Corgis with titbits of antelope loin.

4. DEALING WITH DRUNK PARENTS. This situation occurs every year, but is never anything short of harrowing. Last Christmas, my friend’s mother was grabbed and snogged by the husband of one of her friends, right in front of the man’s wife. Apparently, prising them apart was like trying to remove an octopus from a high-suction hoover-nozzle.

How to survive – Before it gets to the stage where Graham’s wrestling the Christmas tree to the ground, break out the non-alcoholic wine. Make sure to do so discreetly, however – you run the risk of having your neck garrotted with a string of twinkly lights.

5. FOOD. Christmas dinner is notoriously slow to cook, which leaves plenty of time for absent-minded cashew nut consumption. Mince pies also declare war on humanity and bolster the UK wholesale of gastric bands.

How to survive – Accept the fact that you’re going to end up looking like a pregnant Pillsbury Doughboy. Don’t buy a Christmas pudding and a cake – your love affair with both is passionate, but in the end there is only room for one in your heart (and your stomach).

6. SHOPPING. It’s like God wanted to punish us for all of our mortal sins by forcing us to traipse around towns in our quests for novelty bird-feeders.

How to survive – Shop online! In the comforting realm of the Internet you can merrily fill up your metaphorical basket without interacting with a single human. However, if a shopping-trip is unavoidable, allow for regular pit-stops to sample cranberry Stilton and use the M&S facilities. Allow an extra minute for missing the exit in the Debenhams revolving door. About half an hour into your miserable excursion, you’ll start flagging. Be sure to exit TopShop before you reach the ‘zombie’ stage or you may be mistaken for one of the shop assistants. Also, start saving in October – purchasing slipper socks and scented candles will push you to near bankruptcy.

Follow these tips, and you should just about be able to make it through the recurrent nightmare that is Christmas…good luck.

Oxford academics condemn “polemical and simplistic” research

1

Academics and students across Oxford have united in condemnation of a controversial research project, accusing it of seeking to justify British colonialism.

Almost 60 Oxford academics have now signed an open letter that attacks Nigel Biggar’s ‘Ethics and Empire’ as “too polemical and simplistic”, while the Oxford Centre for Global History has sought to distance itself from his research. 

But the University has again defended Biggar, emphasising the “fundamental importance” of academic freedom in its recent statement.

The open letter – written by Oxford scholars specialising in the history of empire and colonialism – claims the project “asks the wrong questions, using the wrong terms, and for the wrong purposes”.

They insisted “neither we nor Oxford’s students in modern history will be engaging with the ‘Ethics and Empire’ programme, since it consists of closed, invitation-only seminars”.

Professor Biggar  Regius Professor of Moral and Pastoral Theology at Christ Church – attacked the letter as “collective online bullying”, saying none of the academics had “the courage or sense of collegial responsibility” to raise their concerns in person”.

He added any of the academics would be at liberty to refuse an invitation to the exclusive workshops, but they “would not close the discussion down. They do not have the right to control how I, or anyone else, thinks about these things”.

The Oxford Centre for Global History said they were “not involved in Professor Biggar’s workshop or project”. Instead, they stressed that their programmes engaged critically with the “complex legacies of colonialism”, moving beyond “the problematic notion of a balance sheet of empires’ advantages and disadvantages”.

The Oxford University Africa Society also waded in, saying: “The Africa Society categorically rejects these latest attempt at colonial apologism, yearning and re-justification through the pursuit of dishonest scholarship by Biggar and associates.”

The society decried what they described as attempts to “rig these workshops by wholly excluding critical scholars”. They nonetheless clarified that they had no interest in attending “Biggar’s bigoted workshops”, as he had “already proved himself incapable” while defending Cecil Rhodes in a debate at the Oxford Union.

In response to the open letter, a University spokesperson said: “It eloquently illustrates an alternative perspective on empire taken by other University academics in related but different fields.

“Argument and differing approaches to topics are to be expected in an environment with many different disciplines and where the robustness and good health of academic freedom is fundamentally important.”

The furore follows the debate surrounding an article written by Biggar in The Times, entitled ‘Don’t feel guilty about our colonial history’, in which he claimed we should “moderate our post-imperial guilt”.

The article provoked a statement of opposition from student group Common Ground, which drew attention to Biggar’s joint leadership of the ‘Ethics and Empire’ project. The other academic in charge, John Darwin, withdrew from the project on Sunday for personal reasons.

The McDonald Centre – the University organisation which runs the programme – describes the project as “a series of workshops to measure apologias and critiques of empire against historical data from antiquity to modernity across the globe”.

As reported last week, a University spokesperson defended Biggar’s suitability for the role, stating that Oxford supports “academic freedom of speech”, and that the history of empire is a “complex topic” that must be considered “from a variety of perspectives”.

They said: “This is a valid, evidence-led academic project and Professor Biggar, who is an internationally-recognised authority on the ethics of empire, is an entirely suitable person to lead it.”

 

Professor Biggar said that participation in the project is by invitation only “so as to enable focused reflection and sustained discussion on important matters by a necessarily small and select group of relevant experts”.

He added that the “current illiberal climate” means that “such discussion is only possible in private, because the ideological enemies of free speech and thought would disrupt it, were it to be held in public”.

 

Council pledges £1.4m to help the homeless

0

Oxford City Council has proposed significant spending increases to combat homelessness in its proposed 2018-19 Budget plans.

The Council plans to increase the current £1.4m annual funding of homelessness prevention services by £200k until 2022. An additional £5m is to be reserved to purchase 15-20 properties for use by local homeless families.

It has also been announced that the council will use an abandoned house in Rose Hill to serve as temporary accommodation for rough sleepers.

The UK Government approved a Compulsory Purchase Order for the four bedroom house in Spencer Crescent, Rose Hill. It has been empty since the owner’s death in 1989. Renovation plans are now underway.

The news follows the most recent homelessness street count in November, which showed that 61 people were sleeping rough in Oxford, the highest recorded figure in the city’s history.

The report on the proposed Budget stated that over 300 people a year fall into rough sleeping in Oxford, more than 25 per month.

Councillor Mark Rowley, the Board Member for Housing, told Cherwell: “Oxford City Council spends more on homelessness prevention and services for homeless people than almost any other Council of comparable size.

“Demand is rising, due largely to Government benefits and housing policy, and we are increasing our contribution still further by providing new homes … and by increasing our contribution to the local organisations that help the homeless.”

Ed Turner, the Labour Councillor in whose ward the Rose Hill property is located, told Cherwell: “I’m pleased and relieved. There are many people in acute housing need locally who have walked past this house, knowing how they, or someone like them, would benefit from being able to have it.”

As Deputy Leader of the Council in overseeing the wider budget plans, Turner said: “This budget has been produced in challenging times for Oxford. Some government policies, notably the freeze on benefits and the introduction of Universal Credit, may exacerbate [homelessness].”

Local charities have reacted positively to the Council’s actions. Homeless Oxfordshire works closely with the Council to provide emergency accommodation and day services for rough sleepers.

The charity’s Chief Executive, Claire Dowan, told Cherwell: “Homeless Oxfordshire welcomes any additional funding that will be used to support rough sleepers, people that are homeless or those that are vulnerably housed in the City.

“Homelessness is a significant issue at the moment and the City Council are working hard to address the problem.

The steps taken in the proposed Budget follow the UK Government’s decision for 2016-17 to reduce, by £956k, the Council’s Preventing Homelessness Grant allocation. Oxford County Council is also now withdrawing funding for supported accommodation for homeless persons.

Bob Price, Leader of Oxford City Council, told Cherwell that the new budget plans are intended to “soften the impact of the County Council’s complete removal of their £1.3m ‘Supporting People’ budget on the charity-based services which provide support and preventative interventions for single homeless people”.

Alex Kumar, Chair of Oxford University SU’s ‘On Your Doorstep’ homelessness campaign cautiously welcomed the proposals, saying the Council’s steps were “reassuring”.

He told Cherwell: “Failure on the part of others does not license inaction: it makes inaction inexcusable. It would be a great disappointment should either of these plans not survive consultation.”

“Our councillors now face some pressing decisions. Are they to preside over a city in crisis where businesses erect barricades and homeless squatters are evicted from unused buildings, or are they to take a stand for those who sleep in our city’s doorways, who have nothing, and ask for so little as a shelter on a cold, windy night?”

Regarding the proposed budget, the City Executive Board will consider all proposals on Wednesday before a budget consultation period opens inviting public involvement. The final budget is to be approved in February.

A pick of Oxford’s best running routes

1

Whether it’s the realisation that college food is taking its toll, the desire to resuscitate the glory days of Year 7 cross country, or just a desperate attempt to break away from the monotony of work, there are many good reasons to go out for a run in Oxford – but where to go?

The University’s myriad running societies provide an excellent entry point for fresh-faced first-years, but for those looking for a more independent run, they may not be the shoes that fit. Here I hope to provide a review of several places in which to run in and around Oxford, based on a fresher’s first foray into running here, to illuminate those wondering where to start, or perhaps just seeking a new route.

The most obvious port of call is Christ Church Meadow. Central and popular, the meadow offers a nice circuit with great views of Oxford from its far side, decent terrain (provided there isn’t another freak snowfall), and is mercifully flat. There’s also the added bonus of running past some rowers and enjoying the feeling that you’re staying fit without having to wear those questionable unisuits. However, the meadow can get very busy, and the danger of encountering that college crush in a sweaty mess always looms.

Not as centrally located as Christ Church Meadow, University Parks are nevertheless well worth trying out, particularly for those craving those classic sports field vibes. It may not have the views of Oxford to be enjoyed at Christ Church Meadow, but the idyllic tributary of the Thames from which this newspaper gets its name provides equally satisfying serenity during a good jog. The many paths criss-crossing the parks allow for some experimentation with routes, all of which are again very flat.

If you feel like heading further field, and don’t mind slightly more treacherous terrain, Port Meadow may be the place for you, provided you’re fortunate enough to have a bit more time on your hands – I’m looking at you, historians. Views across the meadow on a misty morning are truly stunning, and its size means you can enjoy the experience of a proper escape from the city.  

An honourable mention should perhaps go to Aston’s Eyot, down beyond the Iffley Sports Complex. It may be some distance from most colleges, but if you want to get away from other runners/people/any sense of civilisation, give it a look. Just beware the prevalence of nettles on some of its lesser-beaten tracks!

It may well be that all or none of these places appeals to the runner in you, but I would wholeheartedly recommend giving each of them at least a try, for a bit of variety if nothing else. Happy jogging!

Is the ‘vac’ really a vacation?

0

Somewhere around fifth week the thoughts of home first enter your mind. You’re slaving over an essay in the early hours of the morning, but you can’t help feel you’d be much comfier in your cozy childhood bedroom rather than your damp student accommodation, complete with a single bed whose springs pop and poke you, damaged by the enthusiastic relations of previous occupants and their guests.

Your college bar is great (and cheap) but your favourite haunts back home are where you had your first legal drink, and your student loan is quickly disappearing down the slots of the games machine.  By the end of eighth week, even Hassan’s cannot satisfy your culinary needs like your mother’s home-cooked meals can. Being home at the end of Michaelmas means Christmas food, warm nights in or nights out in your hometown, the pure joy of no deadlines and all the free time gained from not having to work, right? Wrong. Alas, this is the Oxford life – you don’t get the pleasures of being able to relax.

Eat a mince pie, have a glass of fizz, but remember – on the other side of the vac there are collections. Who wants to return from a perfect Christmas only to realise that instead of catching up with your friends in the college bar, you have to sit a handful of collections? This taints the whole holiday period. You can’t win. Either you’ll do plenty of work but end up missing out on Christmas markets and mulled wine, or you’ll indulge in wintery festivities with the guilt hanging over your head. Collections are the peculiarity of Oxford that contributes to making it so infamously taxing a place to study over other institutions: they limit your ability to truly unwind.

Even if you get over the burden of revising for collections, or scratch the itch of guilt at not ‘getting ahead’ on coursework, there’s still that little voice at the back of your mind that whispers “hey, you know that one day you’re going to leave the Oxford bubble and need a JOB? Your degree alone is not enough to fall into your chosen profession.” Oh. Then you’re flooded with more panic when you realise that you should probably be applying for internships, vacation schemes, and work opportunities. There are few things more anxiety-inducing than the festive buzzkill of repeatedly filling in your GCSE results and details of your stint working in a local pub, hoping that it will somehow satisfy the requirement for being hired by a prestigious international business.

“Isn’t this the same situation for students at other universities?” my mother said when I explained the rant I was producing. Eight week intensive terms, no reading weeks, and termly collections aside, it honestly is. Most ambitious students will apply for an internship or so in their time, and feel the pressure to revise last term’s material, knock off some of the new reading list or write chunks of dissertation in advance of term.

But does the universality of stress make it somehow okay? Why is there a culture of prestige to burning out or having a very precarious work-life balance? I accept that it is no less easy in the working environment and that it is necessary to work hard on internship applications and academic work. But there’s something to be said about questioning a university culture that exhausts students, where people fall into periods of depression and anxiety over the competitive workloads and ambitions for professional success.

To develop as a young adult, and a future professional, it is just as important to enjoy the festive time with family, and to not feel guilty over making memories (eurgh, I’m so cliché). You need good mental health in order to thrive, and currently Oxford does not do well at suggesting to its students that rather than become an overworked zombie, sometimes it’s okay to just stick your middle finger up at your reading list and enjoy the time off.

Cutting time at university won’t cut inequality

0

The claim that universities are bastions of privilege is virtually axiomatic. Systemic inequality within the education system culminates to reflect a demographical and financial imbalance within universities. The most controversial aspect being the shift in the burden of pay from the state to the student.

As it stands, university tuition fees are at £9,500 per year with a 4.6% interest rate, deterring less-privileged prospective students from applying. This is a perversion of the principles of the right to education. Indeed, it was the miscalculation of the impact of tuition fees that so famously buried the Liberal Democrats in the coalition.

The consensus on the need for change (or reaction to the pressure for change) is broadly shared, hence Theresa May abandoned the planned £250 increase in fees for 2018-19. Similarly, in July this year, Damian Green stated that student debt in its current form is a “huge issue”. Acknowledging the flaws in the university system is a non-partisan apprehension. But Universities minister Jo Johnson’s most recent ‘solution’ to the problem of astronomical student debt, to reduce university courses to two years, is short-sighted and lacks a clear rationale.

His proposal to amend the Higher Education and Research Bill would allow for more ‘flexible learning’ and offer a higher annual fee limit for accelerated courses, subject to Parliamentary approval. For Johnson, an overwhelming majority of courses could be done in two years, especially with the development of the internet which has had a transformative impact on teaching methods.

An efficiency drive of this nature relates to a key assumption about academia: that the humanities don’t offer as much in terms of skill set as other more vocational degrees. For Simon Jenkins, newspaper columnist for The Guardian and past editor of The Times, the humanities are content with the valuation of education as an inherent good. Jenkins neglects to mention that the humanities will arm an individual with the ability to conduct a critical investigation, such as this one.

It is a valid statement that engineering will literally give a student a more tangible skill set. But valuing engineering above philosophy is characteristic of a paradigmatic view towards education that is driven by economic output and productivity. This is precisely the indictment that Stefan Collini makes in Speaking of Universities. For Collini, the systemisation of funding and governance has forced universities to engage more in market behaviour and entrepreneurialism. The imposition of these values from policy-makers has detracted from the value of universities as centres of learning. This detraction takes a very literal form in Johnson’s proposal to cut the three-year course.

The narrative on universities clearly expands past student loans. In his article, Simon Jenkins refers to a debate held at London’s Institute of Education between two top educational economists, Mark Blaug and John Vaizey. The debate was centred around university being a mode of personal consumption or an institution of national investment. Vaizey argued that universities were indeed a project of national investment (supposedly without offering a plausible rate of return), whilst Blaug argued that university was merely a vehicle for middle-class consumption.

One economist from the event suggested that economic growth in Germany and East Asia preceded mass access to higher education. Similarly, Alison Wolf argued that post-graduate wages are stagnant, productivity is low, and 1/3 of graduates are in non-graduate jobs. But a solution like Johnson’s, which focuses solely on time and financial efficiency, ignores the complexity of the debate surrounding higher education. Furthermore, Johnson misses one key fact about university: it should also be a period of personal development.

Johnson plans to encourage more universities to adopt these ‘accelerated degrees’ by permitting them to charge a 20% premium, raising fees to £11,100 to cover additional costs. Johnson argues that the accelerated degree will create a more efficient system whilst encouraging mature students to apply, whose application to university has shown a marked decline since the rise in tuition fees. So what of the alternatives? Labour’s solution is even simpler: to cut tuition fees all together and pay the £50,000 of debt. This acts as a corrective for the imbalance between private and state burden for higher education, which depending on your political affiliation is a good or bad thing.

In doing so, the fees would be shifted to the richest 40% of graduates away from poorer tax payers. Jenkins suggests an income tax coding system based on the years spent in higher education would be fairer. This attempts to get around the congestion in debt repayment, another serious issue. The Economics consultancy London Economics predicted up to 48.6% of loans will not be repaid. The diversity in solutions further highlights that whilst the numerous problems may be an area of cross-party consensus, building non-partisan support for any solution will be hard. In this case, Johnson’s attempts to push reform through parliament will see a substantial backlash from the Labour party who are determined to scrap tuition fees all together.

There are 140 institutions in the UK teaching more than 2.5 million students. It is time that universities are treated as more than a channel for rhetoric. Fair access to education is still, regrettably, a privilege. But it is not just the specific policy, but the approach itself that must change to ratify this inequity. Reviewing student loan arrangements or cutting the time students spend studying are solutions indicative of a British attitude problem. The quantification of the value of university should be greater than the rate of return from graduates.

The British political establishment have historically struggled to participate in great collective ideas. This had traction during the Brexit vote as the British had always failed to view the European project as a codification of collective freedoms, as well as a tool for economic convenience. To this affect, policy-makers must place education at a higher level of credence. Valuing fair access to education above economic efficiency is an imperative. Collini postulates a bold but surmountable task (or cliché): “to think again, think more clearly, and then to press for something better.” Johnson’s policy appears to be a short-term solution, but in reality, it entrenches a view of higher education as a machine for creating economic output. It is this perspective which posits that university should only be for the few for whom it is most efficient. It is this approach that will ensure inequality within our higher education system remains.