Wednesday, May 14, 2025
Blog Page 874

University criticised for “Eurocentric” prizes

0

Billy Nuttall, a history student at Magdalen, launched a crowdfunding campaign this week to make up a difference of over £400 between Oxford’s History dissertation prizes for British and African research pusuits.

In a post on the Facebook group Race Matters, Nuttall criticised the university for awarding a £500 prize for the best undergraduate thesis in British history as compared to only £75 for African history.

The post sparked lively debate, with some Oxford students commenting that this could be reasonably expected from what is, after all, a British university. Others, however, were less forgiving.

One student commented that the disparity meant “disrespect has been monetised”.

For Billy, the problem is by no means contained to the recognition that a thesis receives.

Speaking exclusively to Cherwell, he said “It’s contributing to an overall issue.

“The syllabus has two compulsory elements of British history, two compulsory elements of European history, and no African no Latin American, no Asian [compulsory elements]”.

Nuttall claimed that such policies are indicative of an attitude which has far-reaching effects.

He said: “It discourages people from studying world history…and to people who have these interests—who could be the best in their fi eld in these interests—from coming here.”

He added: “Why would you want to come here when you could go somewhere like Cairo [to study world history] where the resources might be more readily available?”

More widely, Nuttall spoke of how the likelihood of harm to access motivated him to highlight the issue.

“I was doing some outreach work for Magdalen… with some schools from London. When asked what their first impressions were of Oxford the students said ‘rich’ and then ‘white.’

“This was clearly of concern to the people of colour in the room, despite the excellent cultural movements coming out of Oxford-based Black life, they still felt they would be unwelcome in the university… And this ultimately has led me to want to do something to help, anything really.”

For many, Nuttall’s comments strike an all-too-familiar chord. Oxford University has long been accused of a ‘eurocentric’ and ‘colonialist’ outlook when it comes to history, with such accusations coming to a head last year, when the Rhodes Must Fall campaign drew national coverage.

Asked whether he thought the history department’s attitude interacted with the RMF campaign, Nuttall said: “Yes, definitely.”

He went on to say that he had spoken to active members of RMF who shared his sentiments and agreed that something should be done to correct the disparity.

Billy was not content, however, just to complain of the difference between the prizes. Challenged on Facebook to come up with a solution, he began a crowdfunding campaign which has already begun to receive donations.

“The University of Oxford spends money on so many other things like port and wine and expensive dinners… £425 is not even a drop in the ocean to the university, and it would set this award on an equal playing field with other awards.”

The problem, he said, comes from graduates’ greater willingness to fund research into fields that they themselves pursued whilst studying. More people study British history, he claims, and thus more people are willing to “come back and fund [it].”

He added that the disparity was compounded: “African history is a very new area that’s being looked into by British historians”.

“Until you get a generation through [an African history programme] the funding isn’t going to come externally. The university has the money to spare, and I think this would be a good place to put it”.

The campaign may have already had some success. A History Faculty spokesman, speaking to Cherwell, said: ‘“Both prizes are funded by external donations, not by the History Faculty, and the discrepancy in their value is simply because one donation was considerably larger than the other.

“But we are conscious of this inequality and, as of this year, we are using our own funds to increase the Kirk Greene Prize for Modern African History to £150, in line with other prizes that are funded by the Faculty including the Modern European History prize.

“Increasing the prominence of African history at Oxford is a priority of the History Faculty. We are currently fundraising for a scholarship in African history for graduate students, we are engaged in curriculum reform which brings African history more prominently into our undergraduate curriculum, and we are participating in a project to create a new GCSE in African history.”

The spokesperson did not confirm if the increased funding for the African History prize had come in response to Nuttall’s campaign.

Countdown to 2017 NUS Election begins

1

The upcoming conference for the National Union of Students (NUS) takes place this year in Brighton from 25 – 27 April, and will see one of Malia Bouattia, Tom Harwood and Shakira Martin elected to serve as the movement’s next president. Since Bouattia’s election last year, amidst allegations of anti-Semitism and followed by referendums at universities around the country regarding NUS disaffiliation, the organisation has experienced a high profile and, at times, extremely turbulent year, with the upcoming election set to be no less volatile.

In this exclusive, each of the candidates has spoken to Cherwell to put forward their case for students.

The NUS President plays a key role in advocating for the needs of students and setting the political agenda at a national level.

Seeking re-election, Bouattia is clear that she wants a union which is both “a lobbying body as well as a campaigning and mobilising force”. Part of a family that fled Algeria during the Civil War to come to Birmingham, Bouattia’s election last year made her the first female Muslim president of the NUS.

She previously served as the union’s Black Students’ Officer, and has been an outspoken critic of the Government’s anti-extremist Prevent strategy, arguing that it is racist and used to target and collect information on British Muslims.

Coming to the end of a year in office, Bouattia’s term has undoubtedly been marred by criticism—particularly from Jewish students for her past comments which contributed to an NUS investigation into alleged anti-Semitim. OUSU earlier this year urged Malia to apologise unequivocally for these comments, yet many feel she has not yet done enough to distance herself from them.

Tom Harwood, a student at Durham University, has been one of the most outspoken critics of the NUS, and ran a successful campaign last year to be an NUS delegate at the national conference which attracted widespread media attention.

Pledges included erecting a giant statue of Malia, and the centrepiece of Harwood’s presidential campaign is his argument that the union should not “grandstand on irrelevant geopolitical issues”.

Harwood claims that low student turnout in NUS delegate elections around the country can be directly linked to a perception that the NUS has been taken over by the far-left. Harwood has, like the other candidates, committed himself to fighting the interest rate rise on student loan repayments. As a leader of the student Leave campaign in the Brexit referendum, he has argued for guarantees over pro- grammes such as Horizon 2020 and Erasmus+. Speaking exclusively to Cherwell, Harwood said: “I feel like I am best placed to convince the Government of our case. The rhetoric of other candidates in this election, saying that any borders at all are racist for example, is unlikely to help secure the best deal for students.”

Malia Bouattia, the incumbent President running for a second term, told Cherwell: “The current period, both in education and in society at large, presents all of us with real challenges. Rampant racism, the dismantling of our sector as well as a growing mental health and sexual harassment crisis are some of the key issues we face.

“Our movement’s response will determine the years to come.

“The snap general election illustrates our tasks. It is critical that our movement uses its national profile to fight against the scapegoating of migrants, for an education that is valued and funded, and defends our ability to both build links with the rest of the world, as students and citizens.

“This vision will be crucial in the next 50 days. However, it must also be at the heart of everything we do as a movement. It is that vision which has guided my presidency for the last twelve months. This year, I am re-standing to continue this work.

“Whether through demonstrations or lobbies of the houses of parliament, I have used every platform available to put forward our movement’s vision of a free, liberated, and accessible education for all. I am asking students to re-elect me so that we can continue this work together.”

Shakira Martin, a current Vice-President of the NUS and colleague of Bouattia, announced in March that she too would be making a bid for the presidency. She has pledged to set up a student poverty commission and has used her time in the NUS to shed light on the role that class still plays in education. Her re-election last year to the post of Vice President with the Further Education portfolio saw her run unopposed.

As far as student activism goes, Martin pitches her life experience as unique. A survivor of domestic violence who for a time delivered drugs before going back to college, accessibility to education as a lifeline is something close to her heart. Martin told Cherwell she sees her ideal presidency as “focusing on the things that stop students getting involved in their student union”, firstly “campaigning against unfair apprentice pay and anything that stops students getting immediate financial support … in all forms of education.”

Only NUS delegates are entitled to vote in the election for the national president.

The conference, taking place over a number of days, will also see the student body vote on key issues and resolutions introduced, as well as elections to other high profile posts. Two Oxford Students, Aliya Yule and Sean O’Neill, are running for positions on the National Executive Council (NEC) Block of 15. Together with representatives from other NUS ‘Zones’, such as liberation campaigns, who also sit on the NEC, the Block of 15 act as the interim decision making body for the NUS between meetings of the Conference.

The NUS Conference will take place next week at the Brighton Centre

After disaffiliation campaigns in universities around the country were won in the NUS’ favour with promises that there would be real change for students and that the union was not beyond hope, many will be looking to the Conference either as a vindication of how they voted last year, one way or the other. These are interesting times for the NUS.

LEAKED: Oxford Union Trinity Termcard

1

Just hours before the Oxford Student‘s official release of the Oxford Union Trinity 2017 termcard, Cherwell can exclusively bring you the full leaked lineup.

Highlights of this term include Daisy Ridley, lead actor in the new Star Wars Trilogy; Roy Hodgson, former England manager; singer M.I.A; television chef Heston Blumenthal; Sherlock actor and writer Mark Gatiss; comedian Ricky Gervais and fashion designer Marc Jacobs.

The full list of speakers and some highlights from the debates can be found below.

The leak follows the Oxford Student‘s teaser Facebook posts, in which they hinted at the announcement of Judge Judy and Heston Blumenthal.

The termcard will likely be received as a significant improvement on last term’s offerings, and sees the scheduling of some speakers who cancelled their appearances in Hilary term.

The Oxford Student‘s front page, posted on Twitter with redacted names on Thursday evening:

The list:

Armando Iannucci
Daisy Ridley
Dambisa Moyo
David Haye
David Weir CBE
Dustin Lance Black
E. Boujar Nishani
Eddie Jones
Erik Prince
General Raymond Thomas
Gus Poyet
Helen Glover MBE
Heston Blumenthal OBE
Howard Gordon
Jeffrey Archer
Jeremy Irons
John Cleese
John Rhys-Davies
Judge Judy
Marc Jacobs
Mark Gatiss
M.I.A
Michael Hayden
Morgan Tsvangirai
Nick Cave
Prof Lisa Randall
Prof Maurice Obstfield
Ricky Gervais
Roy Hodgson
Sally Jewell
Sérgio Moro
Simon Mann
Sir Derek Jacobi
Sir Venki Ramakrishnan
Tariq Ali
Tony Pulis
Vadim Krasnoselsky
Wiley
Yeonmi Park
 Debates – Highlights
Big Narstie
Katie Hopkins
Peter Hitchens
Piers Corbyn

Oxford MP announces retirement ahead of snap election

0

Andrew Smith, the Oxford East Labour MP for 30 years, has announced he will not be standing as a candidate in June’s snap general election.

In a message to constituents on his website, Smith, 66, said: “This election is for a Parliament which is likely to run until 2022, when I would be over 71, so I think it is now time for someone else to take forward the work of serving local people as your MP.  I will therefore not be a candidate in the election.”

Thanking constituents for their support, Smith added: “It has been a huge privilege to serve as MP for Oxford East, and we have achieved so much together.”

“My belief and confidence in the values of fairness which Labour stands for are as strong as ever, and I will work tirelessly to help secure the election of a Labour MP for Oxford East, carrying forward the service which Oxford Labour gives our local community.”

Smith’s decision follows Theresa May’s surprise announcement yesterday of a snap general election to be held on 8 June.

The announcement will open a nomination process for Smith’s replacement as Labour’s Prospective Parliamentary Candidate for the seat. The Oxford East constituency contains the majority of University colleges and the Oxford city centre.

Smith, who studied at St John’s college, was first elected as Member of Parliament for Oxford East in 1987, beating the Conservative candidate. He has held the seat ever since, with a majority of 15,280 from the 2015 general election.

He briefly served as a minister in the Department of Education after Labour’s 1997 election win, before becoming Chief Secretary to the Treasury from 1999 to 2002. He was Secretary of State for Work and Pensions from 2002 to 2004.

In his statement today, Smith said: “I am very thankful to constituents, Labour members and my office staff for their support and work over the years.

“It is always hard to give up a job you love, but that time comes.”

Constituents have expressed their sadness at his departure on social media.

https://twitter.com/CllrTomHayes/status/854655486377033730

https://twitter.com/billfranklinuk/status/854659041922097153

The crisis facing PhD students

0

According to a recent study conducted by Ghent University in Belgium, one in two PhD students experience ‘psychological distress’, whilst a third are at risk of developing depression or another common psychiatric disorder.

The research also suggests that the prevalence of mental health issues in PhD students is far higher than in the general highly educated population. Results showed that 32% of the 3659 students involved were at risk of developing a disorder, which was more than double the number of the highly educated control groups.

Most commonly, symptoms involved feeling under constant strain, being unhappy, and losing sleep because of worry. However, the work and organisational context were significant predictors of PhD students’ mental health. Balancing work with family commitments, high job demand, and low job control were associated with increased symptoms.

However, having an inspirational supervisor with a good leadership style was associated with decreased symptoms. The authors of the study wrote: “When people have a clear vision of the future and the path that they are taking, this provides a sense of meaningfulness, progress and control, which should be a protective factor against mental health problems”.

Although the sample was small, and 90% of the students involved were studying science or a social science, this comes in light of increasing prevalence of mental health issues in academia. A study conducted by the University of California, Berkeley, suggests that 47% of PhD students scored at least 10 out of 30 on the scale to be considered depressed.

Co-author of the study, Katia Levecque of Ghent University, said she would expect the results of a similar study to be much worse in the UK, where fees are higher and grants are lower.

Nathan Vanderford, an assistant dean for academic development at the University of Kentucky, wrote: “The study underscores what has long been presumed; that work conditions and career outlook plays a key role in the mental state of PhD trainees. Institutions, departments and PIs have long ignored the systemic mental health issues among PhD trainees.”

Recent research suggests that mental health across universities needs to be better addressed. In 2016, a YouGov survey found that 21% of UK students did not find their university’s mental health services to be adequate.

Earlier this year, students at Oxford University were labelled as the most unhappy in the UK by a study conducted by Sodexo. It found that 22% of students at both Oxford University and Oxford Brookes regretted enrolling.

Scientists aim to be the first to reach the Earth’s mantle

The Japanese Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC) plans to drill down through the Earth’s crust and reach the mantle, the second of four layers which make up the Earth. While researchers have been attempting this elusive feat since the 1960s, if JAMSTEC and its partners succeed they will be the first to ever to do so.

The project will begin with a preliminary expedition undertaken by seafloor survey vessel Kairei, which, equipped with submarine vehicles and dredges, will use sonar to test the structure from the seafloor to a dozen kilometres underground. These tests will take place in September this year in waters northeast of Hawaii, with the coasts of Mexico and Costa Rica also to be considered for drilling.

Once a drill site has been chosen, the project will be handed over to JAMSTEC’s flagship vessel, Chikyu, equipped with drilling technology normally seen only on commercial oil drilling platforms. Chikyu will have to lower its drill through 4 kilometres of ocean before attempting to reach through the 6 kilometres of rock which make up the crust, the outermost layer of the earth. This may seem a long distance, but it is relatively thin—if the team were attempting the same feat on land, they would have to drill through dozens of kilometres of rock to reach their goal.

JAMSTEC hope to begin excavating as soon as the early 2020s, but there are financial concerns. The Integrated Ocean Drilling Platform (IODP) made plans to use Chikyu for a mantle expedition back in 2013, but the project was hit by severe budget troubles, and this new project has an estimated cost of ¥60 billion (roughly equivalent to £400 million).

The researchers hope that by sampling the mantle and the crust-mantle divide, it will be possible to better determine how the crust initially formed, giving us insights into the geological history of our planet.

Speaking to CNN, some of the JAMSTEC team expressed excitement about the prospect of finding microbial life deep under the Earth’s surface. In 2006, a group of Princeton-led researchers working in a South African mine some 2.8 kilometres below the surface discovered bacteria alive and well leading scientists to ask just how deep into the crust organisms can survive. The study of organisms who live in seemingly inhospitable conditions, so-called ‘extremophiles’, is exciting to many scientists as they give an insight to the adaptations developed in extreme conditions, possibly hinting at the characteristics of life on other planets.

The Japanese government also support the project with a more practical reason in mind: by developing better drill technology, drilling further than ever before, and discovering more about the mantle, many advancements can be made in predicting earthquakes—a major and common problem in Japan due to its location on the edge of the Eurasian continental plate. This will also help deal with devastating tsunamis and tidal waves which are often caused by undersea earthquakes.

The research vessel Chikyu has a history of earthquake prediction. It has been used in the past to investigate the join between the Philippine and Eurasian tectonic plates, which cause many of Japan’s earthquakes as they slowly scrape past each other. It may now be possible that the same vessel, drilling in pursuit of a geological holy grail that has been sought for over 50 years, can uncover crucial information about the first two layers of the Earth, with consequences not only for Japan, but across the world.

Peter Capaldi’s Doctor—interstellar success or time to regenerate?

0

WARNING: SPOILERS FOR CAPALDI’S TENURE FOLLOW

Doctor Who is about to undergo major change, change that it hasn’t seen since the departure of Russell T. Davies in 2010. Not only is Steven Moffat—the head writer and a long-time contributor to the show—hanging up his hat after this year’s Christmas Special, but lead actor Peter Capaldi is preparing to regenerate. As we head into their final run, it feels right to take a look back on their tenure together and examine quite what they’ve achieved so far.

Coming off the back of Series seven—certainly the weakest of the Matt Smith era, and possibly the worst of the revived show—the arrival of Peter Capaldi’s Doctor signalled a welcome change from what had come before. While Matt Smith’s cheerfully childish interpretation of the character was a charming presence onscreen, it had become inextricably linked with the convoluted narrative arcs that dominated his time in the TARDIS. His character could not be separated from Trenzalore and the Silence and the Question, and as that storyline began to crumble under its own weight, it was impossible to avoid feeling a certain degree of animosity towards his incarnation as well.

The emergence of Capaldi’s Doctor was the beginning of a new era, free from the baggage which had weighed down the later parts of Smith’s run. His Doctor was dark and unpredictable, and the show was willing to exploit this rougher side of him for some shocking moments in his first couple of episodes. Did he kill the Clockwork Man at the end of ‘Deep Breath’? How he could allow the soldiers to be killed in ‘Into the Dalek’? This was a ruthless incarnation of our favourite Time Lord, willing to make tough decisions without a moment’s hesitation.

Series eight benefited from this regeneration massively: from the outset, Twelve’s next move was impossible to call. The Doctor-Clara dynamic—which had been mired in overdone romance and wearying mysteries—was reanimated, given new life and set off in a direction as-of-yet unexplored in New Who. This central relationship was complemented by a number of stand-out episodes: ‘Into the Dalek’, ‘Mummy on the Orient Express’ and ‘Listen’ are all excellent demonstrations of quite what the show is capable of, scary and challenging and featuring fresh takes on some of the show’s fundamental elements.

Nevertheless, Series eight was hampered by its inability to let these exciting new dynamics play out: instead of simply presenting the Doctor’s unusual approach to a number of moral dilemmas, he had to navel-gaze endlessly, questioning whether or not he was a good man; his resentment towards soldiers couldn’t just simmer beneath the surface, but had to be made glaringly obvious in his every interaction with Danny Pink. This thematic obviousness, this tell-don’t-show approach, this ten-ton heavy-handedness, reached its nadir in the disappointing series finale. While far from the worst episode of the show, it bumbles around for fifty minutes before reaching a conclusion that most of us knew all along: that the Doctor isn’t good or bad, but simply a traveller trying to do his best. What should have been a stirring reaffirmation of the show’s core principles was instead a redundant response to a question that had been asked so loudly and so incessantly that I had long since stopped caring about the answer.

Series nine was a significant improvement upon its immediate predecessor: the writing was subtler and more effective, episode quality was far more consistent and the use of the two-part format allowed the creation of more complex, engaging narratives. To name a stand-out story would be to do a disservice to the rest of the series. However, one notable failure does hold over from Series 8: a distressingly mediocre finale. The episode somehow squanders the mother of all premises, ignores nine series’ worth of build-up and delivers something that is almost offensive in its unwillingness to engage deeply with the Doctor’s relationship with Gallifrey.

Despite these fluctuations in quality, one thing is abundantly clear: whatever writing he has been given, Capaldi is one of the finest actors to have ever taken up the role of the Doctor. Capable of extraordinary range, gifted with breath-taking comedic timing and delivering gravitas whenever needed, he has elevated the show around him.

His monumental anti-war speech in Series nine’s ‘The Zygon Inversion’ is a perfect demonstration of this: flipping between a hammy American accent and heart-wrenching desperation, he single-handedly holds up a scene which could have been ludicrous if performed by a less talented actor. It is a moment in which he is the Doctor completely—hurt and filled with rage, humorous and silly, desperate to avoid violence and determined to fight the good fight. For all the moral ambiguity of the earlier parts of his run, this is the moment he truly embodies the Doctor. It is a stellar turn and perhaps his single finest moment in the role.

To discuss Capaldi’s Doctor without mentioning ‘Heaven Sent’ would be to discuss him incompletely. ‘Heaven Sent’ remains the towering achievement of his two seasons in the role, and is an episode which stands up there with ‘Blink’, ‘The Waters of Mars’ and ‘The Empty Child/ The Doctor Dances’ as one of the best stories since the show’s revival in 2005. Featuring only brief appearances by Clara and an unnamed Gallifreyan child, the episode is essentially a one-hander, its success entirely contingent upon Capaldi’s performance.

And boy does the episode succeed.

A labyrinthine existential nightmare, ‘Heaven Sent’ ultimately succeeds because Capaldi sells it. He sells the Doctor’s grief at losing Clara, he sells the Doctor’s terror in the castle, he sells the Doctor’s horror at discovering the true nature of his prison, and he sells the Doctor’s resilience in the face of immense suffering. His performance is a masterclass, navigating both technobabble and heartfelt monologues with ease, ensuring that the episode lives up to its vast potential. Despite my love for the other New Who Doctors, I simply cannot imagine any of them pulling off the episode in the way that Capaldi does.

Capaldi’s tenure—like all those of the Doctors which preceded him – has had inconsistent writing and direction, reaching dizzying heights in some episodes and abysmal lows in others (I’m looking at you, ‘Sleep No More’). Despite this rollercoaster ride of quality, Capaldi has been nothing but exceptional, expertly portraying a developing Doctor, convincingly moving from the dangerous, darker Time Lord of Series 8 to the warmer, more sensitive one of ‘The Return of Doctor Mysterio’. While it may be time for a fresh start for the show, it will undoubtedly be a little poorer for having lost this magnificent performer.  

John Cleese to speak at Oxford Union

0

Renowned British actor John Cleese is to feature in the Oxford Union’s 0th week lineup, Cherwell can reveal.

Cleese is expected to cover political ground in a talk entitled ‘Why is there no hope?’. He was a vocal supporter of the Obama administration, a detractor of Trump’s presidential campaign and a proponent of Britain’s exit from the European Union.

Despite his sympathies with Brexit, Cleese is also a member of the Liberal Democrats, having previously supported both the Labour Party and the SPD.

Cleese also recently returned to the public eye for his dramatic work, after it was announced that he would work with Alison Steadman on a new BBC show, Edith. His character will be prone to angry outbursts and have a spouse that takes little interest in him – a role that some have compared to his famous character of Basil Fawlty in the BBC’s Fawlty Towers.

Cleese’s other work has included a number of roles in the Monty Python film and television franchise, vocal acting in the Shrek films and as gadget-man Q’s assistant in the 1999 James Bond film The World is Not Enough.

In recent years, his outspoken and occasionally potty-mouthed presence on Twitter has brought him online infamy, along with his responses to journalists and political figures that draw his ire.

The talk will take place at 8pm on Thursday of 0th Week (20 April).

 

My town and my gown: from the Dreaming Spires to semi-rural obscurity

0

The term ‘rustication’ historically meant ‘to be sent (back) to the country’ — the term dating back to the days when Oxford students would all be the sons (this was before women were admitted) of the landed (no new money thanks) gentry (i.e. before they let in slack-jawed yokels like me). Despite the small town of Olney being only 40 miles — “just down the road”, as my parents often remark — from Oxford, my vacation certainly has the air of rustication about it.

Released in 1995, the song ‘Country House’ by Blur includes the phrase “lots of rural charm in the country”. Sure, we have “rural charm”, but there exists bugger all else to do, except walk your dog and act all innocent when it leaves its business on the grass in the park. If this constitutes “rural charm” you can keep it. Though both firmly in the Home Counties of England, the small market town of Olney — population circa 40 at the last count — and Oxford — “too much like London” according to a former work colleague — couldn’t be more different.

I am greeted with the juxtaposition that is beaming suspicion — the locals appear hostile to the new ideas I have acquired while being “at Uni”. I am sure to leave my “airs and graces” — as my former shop colleagues refer to my recounting of experiences at Oxford — at the door. It is quite obvious that my former, now quite distanced colleagues, are interested in how “I’m keepin’” and that’s about as far as it goes. Whether I’m on University Challenge or going to a Commemoration Ball is simply not of concern.

Nobody here is remotely interested in Bridge Thursdays or how much vodka I drank on Saturday night of 7th week, rumours instead zoom through the town about the inconveniences caused by the One Stop van “inconsiderately” parking on the High Street (how they had the cheek to name a street in this town after one of Oxford’s most happening thoroughfares, I’ll never know!). There were once whisperings afoot that a Sainsbury’s (cheap booze) would put the town on the map, but alas these proved to be a bit of a red herring. There isn’t even a Waitrose in the town, such are the depths of deprivation in this otherwise ‘pleasant enough’ patch of Buckinghamshire.

Whilst some Oxonians hail from happening places like Brighton, London or Manchester, I have no such good fortune. As you drive (roads being the most recent injection of infrastructure, being laid in 2009) you are welcomed by a rather bullish sign saying ‘WELCOME TO OLNEY, HOME OF AMAZING GRACE’. The Banksy in me wants to correct it – ‘WELCOME TO OLNEY, HOME OF SAINSBURY’S (NOT!) AND MOANING’. The Olney ‘Noticeboard’ (Moanboard) is the glue that binds this thriving community of happy, happy people — lest Sainsbury’s attempt another invasion and lest anyone park more than 1mm outside their allotted space in the Market Place. Why did I ever leave?

There are joys to living in places like this of course, Olney, and the sheep which encircle this glorified village of do-gooders and nosy Parkers, gives perspective to the Dreaming Spires. It’s truly humbling — the town literally hasn’t changed since the year 1600 — to have a point of reference while at Oxford. Something to remind me where I’ve escaped from, and blot out while getting “bevved” at Parkend.

Interest on student loans set to rise by a third

0

The interest rate charged on student loans is set to rise by a third as the pound’s post-Brexit plunge has caused an increase in inflation.

Whilst current students and new starters are currently charged a rate of 4.6 per cent on their loans, new students this year can expect rates to jump as high as 6.1 per cent from September.

Student loan rates are updated annually and are calculated by using the March retail price inflation figure (RPI) plus 3 per cent. Since March 2016 the UK’s RPI figure has risen dramatically from 1.6 to 3.1 per cent.

The advantages of today’s record low interest rates are being reaped by many consumers, but not by students. Many graduates and students alike will see their student loan’s interest rate surge upwards by more than 24 times the Bank of England’s base rate of 0.5 per cent.

The magnitude of this increase, and the extent to which it will impact each individual, very much depends on when a student entered higher education.The only group not to experience any increase are those who began their university careers between 1998 and 2011. Everyone else will be affected.

Nevertheless, the scale of the jump is disconcerting. It’s true that some students who started university after September 2012 may seek comfort from knowing that they will only have to begin repaying their loan after earning more than £21,000 a year.

Jake Butler, an expert at money advice website Save the Student, said: “I was expecting an increase to student loan interest this year, but this is worse than expected. It really demonstrates that the interest on loans under the new system is far too high and should be reassessed.

“But students need to remember that it’s highly unlikely they’ll pay off their full loan debt before it’s wiped 30 years after their graduation.

“So in reality, this increase is just adding to the massive amounts of accumulative student loan debt that the government will never see.”