Friday 18th July 2025
Blog Page 908

Imagination and immediacy in travel writing

Glancing along a bookshelf at home, names of countries and cities jump out from the spines of various travel guides. Rome, London, and Japan neatly wrapped and bound in a small volume. But rather than prioritising information, or constraining a sense of a place, a good travel guide, in the view of Rough Guides’ Senior Editor Neil McQuillian, “is distilled by author and editor from reams of research, both online, and most importantly, on the ground.”

The very title of Rough Guides’ compendium for first-time travellers, Rough Guide to First-Time Around The World, admits both the hugeness of the world and the exciting possibility of its navigation. By distilling information and experience, in “seeking to get to grips with a place,” good travel writing perhaps combines a tangible expression of that place’s atmosphere whilst allowing every experience to be personal, spontaneous, and new.

As McQuillian explains, during his research for articles, “I focus on in-the-moment observations and, crucially, interactions with people. You can write some of what will prove to be your article’s best bits right there and then.” Although Google news alerts and Twitter searches are an important kickstarter, the “cardinal travel writing sin is attempting to define a place without engaging the people who live there.”

More impersonal or objective tips are an important part of travel guides, but what really prepares a reader for the place then is this sense of personal experience and its interpretation. McQuillian suggests that “it’s all about imagination to the extent that you’re telling a tale. Hold your ‘real’ experiences lightly in your mind and let imagination do its work, pulling those experiences into a form that others will respond to.” The philosophy of travel publishers like Rough Guides is this: to write adventure, but never fiction, constantly aware that a well-written adventure can let readers’ minds wander anyway.

Indeed, travel writing is a form that has a long and rich history, perhaps peaking in what McQuillian describes as a “travel writing golden age” the 1970s and 1980s, with writers like Paul Theroux and Bruce Chatwin. But more traditional printed forms have suffered a decline since then. The primacy of “on the ground” research remains vital, but just as online research acts as another well of knowledge for printed guides, the internet represents in itself a major medium for travel writing. It is diverse—www.roughguides.com alone contains about ten articles on solo travel, including particularly insightful approaches such as ‘Go it alone: a guide to solo travel for introverts.’ The prolific rise of travel blogs and Instagram accounts also reflect how travel writing has become more democratic and accessible.

Might we see the role of the internet enabling a new kind of golden age? It some ways it would seem not—McQuillian notes how readers are tiring of unreliable reports and biased reviews that may help to explain a recent rise in the sale of printed guides after a diffi cult decade. Interestingly, he points out that print travel sections tend to be longer than online articles, often based on the assumption that online audiences have a shorter concentration span (take the example, ‘17 places to take your pug in Peru’). And while the internet does still off er a wealth of concise, useful articles and snapshots of themes and places, a reviving trend of longform journalism also encompasses quality travel writing, again returning to the narratives of travel, of storytelling and immediate detail.

McQuillian suggests that the decline of more traditional travel writing like that characterised by Theroux and Chatwin can be attributed to a sense of the world getting smaller, travel getting easier. As he reminds us however, “that hasn’t stopped small-mindedness—it hardly needs saying that now there is an urgent need for cultural understanding.” Where cultural relations become defined by statistics and stereotypes, informed and nuanced travel writing can play a unique role in fostering that understanding.

Classic travel ideas still take a hold on people’s imagination—The Rough Guide to Europe on a Budget is available from the 1 March (£17.99) in its fifth edition, for example. At the same time, both in print and online, countless niche approaches to travel are catered for. But as a genre that depends on a sense of freedom and particularity for its raw materials, there is no need to favour one way of seeing—McQuillian suggests that during writing, “your subconscious will see to the thematic choreography.” Travel writing may have evolved, but celebrating cultural engagement in a multitude of ways remains as important a message as ever.

How to make the best Oxford pub crawl route

A recent (and also imaginary) poll conducted on a sample size of at least five students revealed some interesting results. When asked to identify the keys to success at Oxford, nearly all the correspondents—apart from the two who collapsed from the stress of even hearing the word ‘succeed’—ranked ‘good grades’ at a paltry sixth position. The answer ‘battlehardened liver’ maintained its monopoly on the first position. This is, of course, unsurprising: apart from rowing, rugby, and rowers complaining about rugby, Oxford’s favourite pastime is drinking. The 139 pubs dotted across the town are a testament to this fact.

So if you’re the type of student who only emerges from the shadows of the Bodleian past sun down, wanting to procrastinate and complain about your impending doom—sorry, deadlines—over a pint or two, look no further.  Here I guide you through how to calculate the most efficient pub crawl route through Oxford, with the help of graph theory.

First, we need to define the nodes or vertices of our graph: the pubs. Using TripAdvisor and cross referencing those results with authorities—*cough* crewdaters *cough*—we find that the best pubs for a pub crawl in Oxford are: The Old Bookbinders Ale House; The White Rabbit; The White Horse; Head of the River; and the Turf Tavern. Collating the distances between all pairs of pubs on the graph, we get Table 1.

In the course of this article, we will refer to the connection between any two nodes—pubs—as an edge. The distance between any two pubs will be called the weight of the edge. Therefore, the weight of the edge between the White Horse and the Turf Tavern is 0.1 miles. Furthermore, a ‘path’ between any two nodes refers not to the physical path between the pubs, but the sequence of intermediate pubs from the pub at the source to the pub at the final destination.

We will also be applying the condition that we will visit each edge and each pub only once, without returning to the source. While this may seem frivolous, it prevents our problem from morphing into the infamous Travelling Salesman Problem, to which there is no efficient solution.

The most obvious, brute-force approach of finding the shortest path through each of these pubs requires checking and comparing all possible routes from start to finish. However, with the use of some assumptions and sophisticated algorithms, we can whittle down these possibilities to just five, in other words a shortest path starting at each node.

To perform this magical reduction in possibilities it would be easiest to first look at a method of tracing a path through a graph known as a ‘breadth first search’. Essentially this involves hitting the nodes adjacent to the starting pub, then the nodes adjacent to these nodes and so on. Dijkstra’s Shortest Path Algorithm does exactly the same, but with an additional distance counter that notes the shortest path to each node in the graph from the source.

While this may reduce the possibilities to just five, Dijkstra’s Algorithm is also a ‘greedy’ algorithm, meaning that it will always choose the next step with greatest immediate benefit and, much like a PPE-ist in an argument, will never backtrack when wrong. Therefore, rather than making progress to the endpoint, it will meander on trying to find the next edge with the shortest weight. Thus, we need to consider an alternate algorithm known as the Floyd-Warshall Algorithm that checks whether a node lies on the shortest path between the source and target and gives the length of this shortest path. We will run this with the small modification that all of the pubs need to be present on this path. We get the results presented in Table 2.

Hence, we see that the shortest pub crawl between the five chosen pubs is of length 1.7 miles. But is it really the most efficient? Through the use of a ‘brute force approach’, we can check that the aforementioned path is, in fact, the most efficient path through all the pubs. Given that the average length of a pub crawl through these pubs is 2.68 miles with a maximum distance of 3.4 miles, we get that the chosen path is 37 per cent shorter than most paths. The downside? How many of us would have the strength or willpower to walk 0.7 miles after having visited four pubs?

Returning British countryside to its roots

The noble sight of the red kite soaring above Oxford’s spires and fields is now commonplace, but these graceful birds of prey have had a troubled past in Great Britain. Despite a golden age in the fifteenth century as valued scavengers keeping city streets clean, they were driven to complete extinction in the nineteenth century in Scotland and Wales following persecution and labelling as vermin. Only the collected and continued effort of environmentalists has reinstated this great bird to British skies. This is one of the success stories in a greater quest to return Britain to its more natural state.

The organisation Rewilding Britain is a group dedicated to just this. Imagine a countryside bursting with life, filled with trees, birdsong, and a plethora of awe-inspiring animals: wolves, bison, elk, and wild boar to name but a few.

It is no secret that our country’s biodiversity is not what it used to be. We’ve lost more of our large mammals than any other European country, bar Ireland. Our expanding towns and cities and wasting of resources have pushed our native species out of their natural environments. Many of these are ‘keystone’ species, occupying the centre of our complex intertwined ecosystems. Like vital pillars supporting the weight of a building, removing these fundamental species destabilises the habitat, threatening its collapse.

One such keystone species at the forefront of Rewilding Britain’s attention is the beaver, not seen in Britain for nearly 500 years until their recent successful reintroduction into Scotland and the trail pair introduced to Devon. This is one of Rewilding Britain’s success stories, but beavers are still a long way from being a common site in our countryside. Much more work is needed.

Beavers fundamentally change the landscape through their construction of river dams, slowing water flow by creating staggered, calm pools. These pools provide ideal habitats for many precious species such as otters, water voles, and birds, by forming a safe haven for their young. What’s more, beavers carry with them great economic benefits. The dams that they build act like massive sponges, holding rain water and releasing it slowly after heavy rain, significantly reducing the risk of flooding. They also create many small reservoirs, preserving water supplies in the dry months and thereby reducing the risk of harmful droughts.

Wolves—another keystone species—used to rule the forest as the top predators historically reigning across the British wildlands. But this wasn’t to last, their reign cut short when they were hunted to extinction in the eighteenth century. Although many purport that their introduction would pose a significant risk to humans, wolves actually tend to stay far away from human activity. The proposed sites of reintroduction in Scotland, despite being very remote, are never far from farmers and their livestock, some of which would inevitably be taken. The issue that must be discussed is whether the health of the ecosystem is worth risking the livelihood of the farmers.

The presence of wolves provides massive benefits to the ecosystem, most obviously through preventing the over-grazing of delicate saplings by keeping herds of wild deer on the move. This allows time for trees to grow where previously only open grassland existed, providing a home for plants, ground living mammals, and a multitude of birds. The presence of trees even reduces flood risk by releasing water after rains much slower than open grassland.

These are just a few of the species which Rewilding Britain are working to return to our pleasant shores. Further plans have been proposed for the return and spread of the lynx, wild boar, bison, and elk, along with numerous birds and fish. For these plans to work they need careful planning and testing, like that occurring with a pair of beavers in Devon, to minimise unanticipated effects, but the possibility of seeing these wonderful creatures throughout the British countryside makes it worth the risk.

Oxford University gives squatters five days to vacate temporary homeless shelter

0

A group of around 20 homeless people and volunteers who have been occupying an old power station owned by Oxford University have been given five days to leave the building, after a possession order was served at court this morning.

The group—Osney Open House—had moved to the power station after being ordered to leave an old VW garage owned by Wadham College, so that it could start pre-demolition work in order to build student accommodation. They have been living in the new site for around 10 days.

The court granted Oxford University an Interim Possession Order (IPO), which ordered the squatters to leave the former power station by Sunday 12 March.

In court, a representative for Osney Open House called for the IPO to be deferred to Monday 14 March.

“Deferring the IPO would prevent the unnecessary and involuntary criminalisation of 21 people, many of whom are beginning to find their feet again following periods of extreme instability.

“These 21 individuals have evidently already experienced circumstances of great difficulty and complexity. We hope that you agree it would be hugely detrimental to the interests of these individuals and indeed the local Oxford community for them to be made homeless tomorrow,” they said.

The squatters say that the part of the building being occupied has been “unoccupied for seven years.” Oxford University have previously stated that the old power station is used by staff for storage purposes, and have raised concern over the safety of the building.

Miranda Shaw, a local resident and Osney Open House volunteer, said: “It’s ridiculous that people are still on the streets in one of the richest cities in the world with so many empty buildings. The University owns so much of the city centre. It would be incredible if the University could show leadership in the face of corrosive cuts at both a national and city level. We are facing a social emergency and this is now the second time that Oxford University has closed its doors. We hope that this will change in the future.”

A University of Oxford spokesperson said: “We requested the court to extend the time for serving the order so that the occupiers are given a few days to pack up their belongings without compromising our right to reclaim the property. The court agreed that this was “appropriate and proportionate” and extended the order until Sunday (12 March). We have been given to understand that the occupiers will be vacating over the weekend.

“Homelessness is a serious issue in Oxford, and we will continue to work with local stakeholders on this matter. Osney Open House have made a serious point by drawing attention to this issue, and we hope to continue working with them. In particular, we would like to see how we can work with and support local homeless charities in the future.”

Lord Hennessy on British politics and the rise of populism

Cherwell Broadcasting Editor Theo Davies-Lewis speaks to Lord Peter John Hennessy, Baron Hennessy of Nympsfield, FBA. A notable English historian and academic specialising in the history of government, since 1992 he has been Attlee Professor of Contemporary British History at Queen Mary University of London. Lord Hennessy was invited by St Antony’s College to speak on the issue of ‘Traditional Parties and the Populist Challenge’ in March 2017.

Oxford ranked world no. 1 in four subjects

0

Oxford University has today been ranked as the number one in the world for the study of four subject areas in a new league table.

The QS World University Rankings by Subject found Oxford is the world’s leading institution for teaching, research, and employability in Anatomy and Physiology, Archaeology, English Language and Literature, and Geography.

Oxford was ranked ahead of Cambridge, which had no top spots this year, having lost its leading position in Archaeology, Mathematics, and History.

The analysis rated Oxford second in the world for History, Law, Medicine, Philosophy, Politics & International Studies, Social Policy & Administration, and Theology, Divinity & Religious Studies.

The survey, compiled by “higher education analysts” Quacquarelli Symonds (QS), ranked Oxford alongside Harvard and Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) as one of only three universities in the world to record a number one position in more than one subject. Harvard had 15 and MIT had 12.

Ben Sowter, Head of Research at QS, said: “Though the University of Oxford, like the rest of the UK’s leading universities, is receiving challenges from more places than ever before – Chinese and Russian universities advance apace this year – this year’s rankings indicate that it has risen to the challenge, continuing to provide world-class teaching, research, and career preparation in a comprehensive range of subjects”.

According to QS, their analysis was based on over 185 million citations, 43 million papers, 194,000 responses to their Employer survey, and 305,000 responses to their Academic survey.

Last year, Oxford was named the best university in the world by the Times Higher Education world rankings.

A University of Oxford spokesperson told Cherwell: “The latest QS rankings show Oxford in the very forefront of the world’s universities, both for the quality of its teaching and the excellence of its research, across the full range of academic subjects.

“This latest league table is consistent with last year’s Times Higher Education rankings, which rated Oxford as the number one university in the world.”

“Even while expecting an hour of postmodernist drama, I couldn’t have been more unprepared”

0

I entered the Keble O’ Reilly theatre on a rainy Friday night, looking forward to an evening of ‘experimental’ student theatre, perhaps along the lines of recent Oscar Wilde short story adaptation The Nightingale and the Rose, or OUCD’s avant garde dance piece Illuminated.

Even while expecting a cheerful hour or so of postmodernist drama, perhaps followed by a pint and a discussion about how ‘experimental’ it was, I could not have been more unprepared for the gripping and bold production that was awaiting me. Perhaps I should have googled the plot of Marat/Sade before arriving, or perhaps I should have known from the fact that the production team was Barricade Arts, whose most recent projects included A Clockwork Orange and Fear, that cheerfulness was definitively off the agenda. Certainly, the trigger warnings for murder, suicide, severe mental health issues and depression alerted me to the fallacy of my jovial expectations.

Marat/Sade depicts a group of inmates at the historical Charenton Asylum acting out a play about the assassination of Jean-Paul Marat, directed by the Marquis de Sade. Although set in 1808, the majority of the narrative comprises the play within a play, harking back to the height of the French Revolution in July, 1793. Although the premise seems grounded in history, really the focus of the production is the inmates who are acting out the drama, and their strained relationship with the figures of authority who govern their incarceration—Coulmier, the bourgeois director of the hospital, and the Marquis de Sade, both of whom occasionally interrupt the play within a play to bring us abruptly back to the world of 1808 and the sad, distorted reality inhabited by the inmates of the asylum.

The script certainly offers a lot to work with, and director Marcus Knight-Adams skilfully crafts together the Brechtian aspects of the play with an experimental staging that enhances the alienation effect—the inmates of the asylum interact with audience members as they try to find their seats before the play begins, and over the course of the final scene an entire lettuce is torn apart and thrown at the spectators; I can attest to having been a personal victim of this creative decision.

To say that Marat/Sade is intriguing is to do it an injustice – every aspect of the production is exceptional. Many of the technical aspects especially stand out, particularly the eerie set design (the focal point of which is a raised bath tub in the middle of the stage), the use of an extremely skilled live orchestra (who provide a dulcet accompaniment to the sombre action), and the thoughtful costume design (with characters like Coulmier donning an authentic 18th century style while the inmates are dressed solely in white pyjamas). The cast are also phenomenal; as well as the immensity of the physical theatre they perform, they are also all very talented singers, and the momentum of the performance proffers an intensity that makes the 80-minute production seem far longer.

Overall, Marat/Sade is a stimulating, thoughtful and provocative piece of theatre that is well worth the trek to the Keble O’Reilly. The cast and crew are both excellent, and the immersive nature of the piece means audience members are engaged throughout in an intense yet fulfilling performance that stays with you long after you leave the auditorium. My only sympathies lie with the stage manager, Chris Goring—good luck picking up all that lettuce.

 

 

Spotlight: Emily the Snake

0

We’ve all been a snake at some point in our lives, or at the least a slow-worm, but few can claim themselves to be a snakey band. Emily the Snake aim to set the record straight, and do so in joyous fashion.

As snakes go, they definitely fall under the rental snake category—in those moments when you’re having a party and you think, I just need a snake, they’re the ones to call.

Formed last year and rising quickly to slots at WadFest and the Bully, Emily the Snake may well be on their way up. The band injects passion into their soul/funk/Abba fusion, and it is intriguing to see what new material will be like when it comes our way. In terms of musicality alone, these guys are one to watch.

Unfortunately, however, Rowan Ferguson (on keys), is a deputy editor of an unnamed rival publication (you can guess which one), and so for any praise we give them we have to make a formal statement that this does not reflect the opinion of our publication.

In the wise words of Super Hans, however, “red next to yella’, cuddly fella”, and as luck would have it, this snake is one to become friendly with.

Life Divided: Cherwell

For (Nicola Dwornik):

Sitting on the expansive lawns of Christ Church Meadow, I crack open a can of San Pellegrino and recline.

I pull out a copy of this week’s Cherwell, perusing my editorial efforts in this week’s issue. Then, upon laughing a bit too heavily at this week’s satire section, I lose concentration as I turn a page. The newsprint slices into my hand and I bleed. But the blood is strangely coloured; it is the same slightly off-red colour of the Cherwell logo. Amid the serene background, I realise I can no longer deny the truth. I am a proud member of Cherwell, and it is a cult that I love.

I knew I was entering something greater than a student newspaper from my very first day. Upon arriving at the building, I was immediately chastised for calling the building an office—“it’s the Choffices, actually”. I soon realised that Cherwell, like a cult, maintains its own codex of grammatical preferences. Innocently named as the ‘Style Guide’, this document is the written belief system that Cherwell is founded upon. Within it, for example, the superiority of the em dash over the en dash is given great attention. After all, the former is the patron saint of Cherwell; there is even a shrine to the em dash in the corner of the ‘Choffice’.

Whilst Cherwell may seem full of pretentious peoples, at least there is a hierarchy that all members gladly conform to. Myself, as an editor of the notorious Life section, am a cult leader. The editors are mere pawns that feed (fake) news to OSPL, and deputies happily supervise the various section editors, subjecting them to hours of learning-through-struggle on the InDesign newspaper design system. It’s like one big happy family.

Like all good cults we have our rivals and renegades. Whilst we may very much express a superiority over other publications we appreciate their existence, as it only makes us a stronger and more cohesive publication. So, let us celebrate Cherwell. Members don’t generally bite and it’s all rather nice really. Besides, crewdates don’t permit blood offerings.

Against (Emma Leech):

The worst thing is that it is impossible to avoid. You scroll innocently through Facebook, and you are accosted by yet another article about Oxford’s pseudo-politics. You stroll innocently down St Aldates only to be barged out of the way by some blazer-wearing mini-Paxman, muttering something about the Choffices. You have to wade your way through thousands of unread papers just to make yourself a cup of tea in the JCR. Cherwell is everywhere and, even more annoyingly, so are its wannabe journalists.

If a gust of wind blows the paper open in the JCR every once in a while, or more likely, one of your token journo friends shoves it in your face because, “no but you simply must read this article I wrote,” then this is what you’ll see. The news section desperately tries to intersperse dull local events with ‘fun’ JCR motions, pretending that seeing “dank memes” in print isn’t vomit-inducing. Comment is like leaving the Union after a debate and having a series of bumbling boys following you down Cornmarket going, “oh and another thing about globalisation…” If you have the stomach to continue, you are faced with culture. Recognise those names? Yeah, they’re the ones whose profile pictures change every thirty seconds to advertise their new play. And, as if that wasn’t enough, they’ve written about it too. If it’s not them, it’s the music writers who are too cool for Cherwell. No really, they even go to Cellar. Investigations remind us, helpfully, each week that Oxford is still living in the eighteenth century. And, honestly, I just commend you if you make it to the back for Sport.

Essentially, Cherwell is a conglomeration of all the worst people in Oxford: the Union hacks, the politicians, the thespians, and everyone else who thinks their opinion is more valid than yours because they have managed to get it down in ink. Thank goodness for the Life section. Once described to me as, “The Tab-iest part of Cherwell,” here you can find solace, at least, in the self-awareness of the editors.

We get it. You hate us.

Food diary: the bagel shops of Beijing

0

In my first year at Oxford, every Sunday, I would get up and order a bagel with chives at G&Ds. No matter how hectic things seemed, I would find time to sit in the same spot, take the same messy first bite, and let the usual roar of life at Oxford dim to a gentle hum.

Last year though, I was in Beijing. It took some hunting to find good bagel shops, but they were there. Hidden among silver skyscrapers and shining shopping centres are half a dozen upscale foreign bakeries. Rather than being comfort food though, bagels slowly became laden with guilt.

You are not here to eat bagels, I berated myself, you are here to get to know China. I felt embarrassed to have “caved”, to be craving food many of my Chinese friends had never heard of. Embarrassed, in essence, to be foreign.

I usually loved eating nothing but Chinese food. Many of my happiest memories in China are focused on what I ate, particularly the Beijing street food. There was so much choice: crunchy, soft pancakes from bicycle pulled stalls, steaming sticks of meatballs dipped into sesame sauce and of course, the baozi. Fluffy, stuffed steamed buns costing no more than 20p each, and plopped unceremoniously into a plastic bag, baozi are an integral part of any breakfast on the go in northern China.

And oddly enough, standing in line—well, never quite in a line, but in a hungry huddle—for baozi in the morning made me feel like a part of Beijing. Even though I stuck out there so much more than in a foreign bakery, at the baozi stand I felt “normal”. Trying to fit in made me feel proud. Admitting how much I missed bagels did not.

The best way to get to know a culture is of course to meet with locals and to eat with locals. Eschewing Chinese food—even only rarely—felt like I was missing out on a part of Chinese culture. And even though I knew logically on my year abroad there shouldn’t be anything wrong with eating food from home, it became something I felt I should resist.

In reality though, that’s not how people or cultures work. Cultures are dynamic, not static, and food is one of the clearest examples of this. Chutney, hummus and pasta—to name but a few—are dishes are of course beloved by the British, but not invented by us.

My situation in Beijing was much more privileged than that of many people who migrate, my needs easily catered for. Nonetheless, experiencing how surprisingly intense the need for a taste of home can be gave me a deeper understanding of why people take their cuisine with them, even when it’s hard to do so. I am very grateful to them. Now, when I find myself dreaming of baozi in Oxford, they’re only a ten minute walk away. And that’s wonderful.