Blog Page 998

Lazy make-up-beauty tips every busy girl needs to know

0

There are times when we all love to spend hours perfecting that smoky eye, piling on the layers and using an army of brushes to get it all done. However, when you’re rushed for time or just feeling plain lazy (i.e. 99% of days in Oxford) it can all seem like a lot of effort, and doesn’t warrant the stress when you also have a lengthy to-do list to tackle by 9am. Luckily, there are plenty of tricks out there which can help minimise that precious time spent in front of a mirror. Next time you’ve woken up late, are running out the door to a lecture, or simply can’t be bothered, these are the techniques and products you should look to for maximum impact with minimal effort. 

Hair styling
Dry shampoo is one of the biggest beauty life-savers. Perfect to revive flat third-day hair with a needed boost of volume and texture. Give it a good shake and spray into your roots to freshen and keep any greasiness at bay. (Try Colab’s Invisible Dry Shampoo in 5 different scents for no chalky white residue, £3.49)

For super-quick Scandi-inspired waves without the fuss, simply plait your hair into four sections and straighten the entire length of each one. Leave your plaits in for a few minutes to cool, then undo and separate. Or even plan ahead and get styled in your sleep to save extra time. After an evening shower, work a lightweight styling cream (like Bumble & Bumble’s Styling Creme, £22) through damp hair and braid away. In the morning, undo the plaits and you’ll be rewarded with dry, effortless waves.

Skincare
If your skin is in good condition you’ll significantly reduce the amount of makeup you need, so make sure to take good care of it! Face masks are a low-maintenance and easy way to treat your skin. Try an overnight mask (like Origins Drink Up Intensive, £24) to rehydrate your skin while you sleep. In the mornings, consider swapping your usual moisturiser for a hydrating mist (such as Caudalie’s Grape Water, £6). Quicker than waiting for a cream to sink in, a mist contains just enough hydration to smooth skin and allow products to apply more easily.

Base
Applying a flawless base with SPF, primer, foundation and setting powder is notoriously time-intensive, so try using a BB cream or tinted moisturiser instead. These products condense many steps into one, and are designed to protect, moisturize and provide a little coverage to even out your skin tone all at once. Plus, you can easily apply these with your fingers to save time faffing about with brushes or beauty blenders. My favourites are Dr Jart + Water Fuse Beauty Balm for £18, and the Nars Pure Radiant Tinted Moisturiser for £29.50.

Concealer
If we could only use one beauty product each day, many would opt for concealer, and for good reason too. It can be used to cover a multitude of sins: cancel out dark circles under the eyes, blot out redness, even skin-tone and conceal any blemishes. By pinpointing spots with a good concealer, you can achieve flawless-looking skin in 30 seconds without the hassle of applying a full face of foundation. The Urban Decay Naked Skin Concealer for £19 is both radiant enough for use under the eyes and provides enough coverage for blemishes.

Make-up multitaskers
Just like the BB cream, you should look out for makeup products that have multiple uses to save both time and money- always a win-win for students. There are lots of these products on the market at the moment, including the iconic Nars Multiple, £29. This multi-purpose stick in 13 shades can be blended onto cheeks, lips and eyes in a matter of seconds and so is perfect for minimal makeup days. Or you could even use your favourite balmy pink or peachy lipstick shade instead.

Eyes
Now is not the time for elaborate eye looks. Certainly don’t attempt a winged liner if you’re in a rush, however tempting it always seems to be. Stick to less precarious products, like kohl, which doesn’t carry the risk of running (like the Charlotte Tilbury Rock ‘N’ Kohl pencil, £19). Similarly, choose cream eye shadow pencils over powder for quick application (the By Terry Ombre Blackstar eye shadows are pretty pricey at £29 each, but you won’t regret the splurge). Simply scribble over the lid and smudge out with your finger for a long-lasting finish that looks much fancier than it actually is.

These practical tips are so easy you’ll be able to follow them even in your half-asleep daze — your morning primping routine can no longer be your reason for running late. Now there’s even more excuse to snooze that alarm just one more time and catch up on some much-needed beauty sleep.

Five Guys burger restaurant could be set to open in Oxford

0

Popular American burger chain Five Guys could be opening a new store in Oxford later in 2017.

The chain plans to move into Magdalen Street, next to the Odeon cinema and the former Lola Lo unit.

Oxford City Council have been lodged with a change of use application to convert the Jaegar clothing shop to make use of the ground floor of the unit.

Five Guys was founded in 1986 as a single restaurant in Virginia, but was reported to have over 1,000 sites in 2013. Fans of the upmarket chain include former US President Barack Obama.

Cherwell‘s Food and Drink Editor, Susie Finlay, offered her own analysis of the news: “With ‘proper’ burgers at Byron and ‘dry-aged prime cuts’ at The Rickety Press, the possible arrival of Five Guys in Oxford just marks a new addition to an already sizeable line of artisan-style burger restaurants, which market themselves as better quality, or more ‘honest’ than the next outlet.

“But this isn’t purely an Oxford phenomenon. The cult of gourmet burgers has taken the entirety of the UK by storm. By 2019, the market is expected to be valued at £3.3 billion. I question whether there’s significant substance behind the slick publicity and aesthetic design, but one thing is for sure – burgers have come a long way from the McDonald’s Drive Thru.”

One Oxford student, who wished to remain anonymous, shared their frustration over the plans: “It’s dismaying to see Oxford once again add to its quite ridiculously competitive culinary scene. Another burger bar to add to Gourmet Burger Kitchen and Byron sitting next to each other, not to mention Banana Tree and Thaikun opposite each other with Giraffe, a poor man’s Nando’s, not much further up George Street than the place it badly rips off.

“I wish that companies would show some imagination next time they try to bait our money with hot food.”

St. Peter’s College undergraduate and prominent food blogger Rosie Crawford, told Cherwell: “There’s so many American stores and multiple burger chains in Oxford—there may as well be another McDonald’s or Burger King! I’m sure these would be more popular with the student crowd, anyway.”

Crawford added: “While it may be attractive for tourists, there are very little vegan options despite such a large percentage of vegetarians at the university.”

The UK welcomed the first Five Guys restaurant outside North America in July 2013, in London on Long Acre in Covent Garden—one day before the opening of Shake Shack’s first UK outlet. The chain continued to expand its UK locations, opening next in Reading, Berkshire. The chain now has 27 restaurants open across the UK.

A decision on the Oxford store is expected by May 24.

Can we trust the new episode of ‘Rick and Morty’?

0

Rick and Morty returned to our screens on 1 April, 18 months after the hard-hitting finale of season two. Was the wait worth it? Did Dan Harmon and Justin Roiland top the mind-bending and emotionally fraught season two premiere ‘A Rickle in Time’ this time around?

Perhaps the biggest question on our lips at the end of the weekend’s episode is whether we can trust anything that we have seen. Harmon and Roiland have rightly garnered a reputation for deviously manipulating and subverting audience expectations, and thus this author is not wholly convinced what took place in ‘The Rickshank Rickdemption’ was strictly ‘true’: major developments in the episode didn’t fit with the established premises and tone of the show.

Most obviously, although Rick’s disdain for his son-in-law is an integral element of Rick and Morty, the thought that he manipulated Beth to divorce Jerry seems a step too far for our protagonist. Remember when he was prepared to die to save Morty’s life at the end of ‘A Rickle in Time’? Furthermore, the episode being released on April Fool’s Day should definitely send our brains into paranoid overdrive.

Yet, one must entertain very seriously the notion that the events of the episode were true, as much as this would leave this author disappointed. Not only would Rick’s treatment of Jerry fundamentally alter the audience’s understanding of him — a flawed, selfish, shallow and callous character yes, but ultimately compassionate — but would also spell an end to the Beth-Jerry marital dynamic. Theirs is an underrated duo, with their dysfunctional marriage offering some of Rick and Morty’s most ingenious plot lines; the ‘Mr MeSeeks’ episode ranking as perhaps the show’s greatest adventure which did not involve the titular characters.

Furthermore, we must also now face up to Rick being responsible for the death of most, if not all, other Ricks and Mortys in every other alternate universe. Whilst murder is nothing new to Rick and Morty, this would be an especially unhappy development, given that some of the best plots involve alternate versions of the title characters entering the fray. Such a development would also again lead us to question whether we can truly consider Rick a ‘good’ character: killing different versions of himself was palatable, but being responsible for the deaths of different Mortys is another thing altogether. This would risk blemishing the cartoon’s track record of staying on the right side of the morally precarious tightrope it so often walks, as it would be hard for Harmon and Roiland to re-alter our perception of Rick back to a damaged but loveable rogue from the irredeemably bad human being that he may now have become.

So whilst this author has mixed feelings about the new episode, this in itself is a testament to the supremely high quality which Rick and Morty has consistently lived up to. We were once satisfied with South Park and The Simpsons pushing the bounds of polite humour, but then reverting back to the narrative status quo after 25 minutes or so. Rick and Morty has pushed us to demand of cartoons not only strong, dynamic narrative progression, but darker humour than any other animated series which has gained a mass, mainstream viewership. Rick and Morty is a trailblazing television show, yet one can hope — maybe somewhat naively — that Roiland and Harmon have not pushed their concept too far, and dealt us too heavy a dose of existentialism and nihilism by turning our beloved Rick into an antagonist.

Oxford LGBTQ+ Society renews condemnation of Jenni Murray

0

Oxford University LGBTQ+ Society has renewed their condemnation of broadcaster Jenni Murray, following national media coverage.

This week’s Sunday Times ran an article on the topic, headlined “Oxford students try to gag Jenni Murray as ‘transphobic'”.

LGBTQ Society originally criticised Murray for comments made in a comment article written in The Times, which it claims “propagate transphobia and transmisogyny”.

Among the more disputed parts of Murray’s article were lines such as “Be trans, be proud—but don’t call yourself a real woman”, and the argument that those who have lived as men “with all the privilege that entails” have not had the same experiences as cis-females.

In a statement published yesterday (Monday 3 April) the Society have since reiterated their “stance on platforming and free speech, their differences, and why this type of action is necessary”.

The statement, released on Facebook in conjunction with the LGBTQ+ Campaign and WomCam, said that Murray’s comments “infer a single, unified experience of womanhood and deny the existence of trans women’s womanhood pre transition or coming out.”

The Society spent the weekend protesting the decision of the Oxford Literary Festival to have Murray as a guest speaker.

Whilst citing their own right to free speech as what gave them the ability to condemn Murray’s comments unequivocally as “transphobic”, they qualified that Murray’s mirror right did not give her “the right to be given an uncontested platform at a high-profile event where many people will be attending and paying undivided attention to the speaker.”

It was also stressed in the statement that opinions such as those of Murray “are not ‘just opinions’, especially when those opinions have a harmful impact on the lives of a marginalised, oft-targeted and vulnerable group of people.”

The statement also made plain the fact that the LGBTQ+ Society, Campaign and WomCam feared lending mainstream credence to such ideas, stemming from the statement’s central theme that to invite Murray was neither apolitical or neutral.

It summarised that “[t]o give Murray a speaking position at a large and prestigious event like the Oxford Literary Festival, which involves paying her an author fee of £150, is to both endorse and reward her transphobic views. Transmisogyny will be propagated, validated and above all normalised.”

When talking specifically of a protest held over the weekend, it was emphasised that the Society’s views on what they considered to be transphobic comments were not just tolerated, but widely supported.

“The protest was attended by a wide variety of people, of different genders and was not limited to students as local community members joined us too… further proving our call to action is not a fringe one, but one, supported by many when the dialogue is opened.”

Katt Walton told Cherwell: “Speaking on behalf of the LGBTQ+ Society as the president I would like to again reiterate how important it is to call out transphobia and transmisogyny and the dangerous ramifications it can have.

“Feminism is not feminism if it fails to include and understand the womanhood of trans women. We, the Society, will always stand by our trans students and our support for them will be unwavering.”

In a statement, the University said that it was “committed to supporting transgender students and staff and to providing an inclusive environment that promotes equality and diversity. We are also committed to freedom of expression.”

Murray’s address went ahead as planned on Sunday at the Sheldonian Theatre with a talk entitled ‘A History of Britain in 21 Women’.

“Elegant, witty, sophisticated, remarkable”: The ‘Philanthropist’

Two very nervous teenagers, your Cherwell stage eds were feeling rather out of their depth when the opportunity to interview the cast of The Philanthropist popped up in our inbox. Directed by award-winning Simon Callow (CBE) and boasting an all-star cast including the likes of Lily Cole, Simon Bird, Matt Berry, Charlotte Ritchie and Tom Rosenthal, it was hard not to feel apprehensive when we arrived in central London for the interview of a lifetime. Fortunately for our nerves, the cast could not have been lovelier.

“This is your first interview? How are you feeling?” grins Tom Rosenthal, straddling a chair and explaining “they’re really bad for your back, these red things!”

His infectious enthusiasm is symptomatic of the energy shared by the entire cast. They all seem genuinely excited by the play and are eager to share that passion. Simon Callow speaks uninterrupted for almost half our time slot when asked what it was about The Philanthropist that first attracted him.

“I absolutely love Christopher (Hampton)’s tone as a writer: it’s elegant, it’s witty, it’s sophisticated, it’s remarkable,” he enthuses, providing at least another ten complimentary adjectives, and Lily Cole agrees: “it’s brilliantly written, witty and at the same time incredibly political and philosophical”. For Matt Berry the attraction was more simple: “because Simon was directing”.

Indeed, the sense of camaraderie between cast members is striking. Charlotte Ritchie and Simon Bird in particular have a steady repartee that makes the interview feel more like a cosy chat, and it is clear that the wit and raillery that distinguish the play are equally prevalent off stage.

As Callow rightly says, the cast is “particularly brilliant in comic work, a great ensemble,” and with so many comedy stars assembled there is one obvious question to ask—who is the funniest in real life? “We could just choose each other,” Charlotte Ritchie says to Simon Bird, to which he replies, “we could, but I’m trying to be honest”.

“Simon [Callow]. He’s in charge,” says Tom Rosenthal, and then adds, “He’s like a book! He’s just got all these Oscar Wilde quotations in his head.”

“I can’t choose anyone” Charlotte Ritchie begins—“because none of us make you laugh,” Simon Bird finishes.

Most of our generation will recognise the cast from their forays into television comedy, from The Inbetweeners (Simon Bird) and Fresh Meat (Charlotte Ritchie) to Plebs (Tom Rosenthal). Is it wildly different acting on stage than on television?

“For me they are utterly, utterly different media” says Simon Callow. “In the theatre, you always have to project it out to your audience, whatever the size, whereas in film the camera overhears you, it’s an interested bystander who watches your performance”.

For Matt Berry, acting in sit-coms acts as a happy halfway house between the two. “Your performance is tailored around the laughs” he says, “but the biggest difference is this (play) is sort of like jumping out of a plane – once you’re out that’s it”.

Another thing that is perhaps notable is how young the cast is. The Philanthropist is set at an Oxbridge-type university, but this production marks the first time that the characters have been played by actors of the age that Hampton intended. Has The Philanthropist brought back memories of student life?

“You’re at Oxford?” Lily Cole asks. “I went to Cambridge, which I imagine isn’t wildly dissimilar, and you get these very politically conscious, bordering on self-righteous groups, and this is a play about those kind of people”.

Simon Bird, who also went to Cambridge, agrees that “I guess there were sort of fusty old professors who were quite similar to some of the characters in this,” to which Charlotte Ritchie adds that “when I was at uni we normally socialised out in a bar, it would be like dancing, it wouldn’t be sitting and having a kind of intellectual conversation… I always imagined Oxford would be like that?” We assure her it is definitely not.

Is there any advice they would give to their 18-year-old selves? “Don’t go to uni!” Charlotte Ritchie and Lily Cole both say immediately, before adding, although less convincingly, “it’s a joke. It’s definitely a joke. Just enjoy it”.

“Put yourself out there,” Simon Bird proffers, and Lily Cole agrees that “anything is possible”. Tom Rosenthal’s advice is perhaps more topical: “put on a production of The Philanthropist”.

The natural chemistry between the cast members and the energy and enthusiasm they all share certainly bodes well for the production, which is set to be a sell-out show. Christopher Hampton’s The Philanthropist, directed by Simon Callow, is at The Trafalgar Studios from 3rd April to 22nd July. Tickets: www.atgtickets.com/the-philanthropist .

What does Brexit mean for the future of scientific research in the UK?

Scientific research is more reliant on international collaboration than ever before. Combining intellectual and physical resources around the world has proven to be central in advancing modern science with over half of all papers published in the UK having an international co-author (60% of which, are with our EU partners). Similarly, international collaboration has led to projects such as the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) and the European Space Agency (ESA) that would otherwise have been simply impossible.  But, with Brexit on the horizon, what does the future hold for both current and prospective UK researchers?

Prior to the referendum, the Royal Society identified three major topics of consideration regarding the role of the EU in research in the UK: funding, mobility, and regulations.

Firstly, and most obviously, is the importance of EU funding. In 2014, the EU greatly increased its funding for research through the introduction of a programme called Horizon 2020. The programme plans to provide a total of €74.8bn for research, mostly across Europe, between 2014 and 2020. To date, the UK is the second largest benefactor, second only to Germany. Overall, 11% of all research funding received by UK universities originate from EU sources, and whilst it is guaranteed that this financing will continue until the UK formally leaves the EU, which could be as late as March 2019, the government has been keen to state that a post-Brexit UK will still aim to be at the forefront of research.

The Chancellor of the Exchequer, Phillip Hammond, clarified in a press release that “Horizon research funding granted before we leave the EU will be guaranteed by the Treasury after we leave.” This is a vow complimented by a £4.7bn increase in the Autumn Statement towards research and development over the next four years.

Some, however, are sceptical about the government’s response to Brexit. The campaign group Scientists for EU described the Autumn Statement “as a confirmation of the bare essentials, but nothing more”, expressing concerns that the government are still yet “to confirm that, should we leave the EU science programme, the same amounts or more will be available directly from HM Treasury”.

Troubling reports regarding the relationship between scientists from the UK and the EU have also arisen. A report from the House of Commons Science and Technology Committee has noted numerous cases of collaborators in multi-national projects pressuring UK researchers to withdraw from projects. Scientists for EU have reported 40 such examples of so-called “Horizon 2020 disruptions” whereby partner pressure has resulted in resignations in leading roles of research projects.

Clearly, clarity regarding the relationship between the EU and a post-Brexit UK needs to be established. The uncertain terms of Brexit have cast a shadow on the future of EU citizens in the UK, who also form 16% of all academic staff in UK universities. Despite the British Government confirming that EU students are guaranteed no changes in their tuition fees for the duration of their studies (provided they are starting before the 2017/18 academic year), there are visible signs of discomfort; UCAS have reported a 7% decline in EU applicants in 2017.

Nevertheless, Brexit could potentially open the door for opportunities outside of Europe. A study commissioned by the Higher Education Policy Institute think-tank predicts that Brexit will result in an extra £187m per year in tuition fees for UK universities, as the fall in EU students are partly compensated by the introduction of non-EU students. Regarding research opportunities, the USA is currently the UK’s single most frequent collaborator, and talks are underway to strengthen the relationship between the two countries’ research institutions. Speaking to the BBC about the relationship of the UK and USA, President of the Royal Society, Professor Venkatraman Ramakrishnan, noted that “cooperation between our two countries would undoubtedly be a good thing… but it should be regarded as an addition to, rather than a substitute for, cooperation with our European colleagues”.

The effects of Brexit on UK research will be felt for years to come. Dependent on the agreements made between the UK, the EU, and the rest of the world, Brexit may eventually serve to broaden the prospects of UK researchers outside of Europe. The initial struggle however, seems to lie in re-establishing both the conveniences of staying in the EU and the opportunities that it currently offers.

Review: ‘Free Fire’

0

Accuse Ben Wheatley of what you like, but diluting violence for the sake of any of the audience’s sensibilities certainly isn’t a criticism that can be levelled against him. Following on from recent projects such as the surreal Kill List and Sightseers, the director changes his chameleonic colours once more, entering the arena of gritty action.

Throughout Free Fire it’s difficult to escape Tarantino comparisons, particularly Reservoir Dogs, due to the enclosed warehouse setting, betrayals, excessive violence as well as Wheatley and Amy Jump’s witty screenplay. Following a brief period of relative calm in which the two sides eventually reach an agreement on an arms deal, a grudge between the back-up men of each group sets chaos in motion. The ensuing stand-off is intermingled with quotable dialogue, much of which springs from the mouth of Sharlto Copley’s flamboyant Vernon. Typical of his braggadocio is a mid-fight monologue where he justifies his homemade cardboard arm shield as “protection from infection” to one of his associates. Wheatley also doesn’t skimp on his trademark colourful language, which is emphasised most eloquently when Frank (Michael Smiley) berates one of his assailants as a “fucking chocolate teapot”.

Yet despite the volcanic momentum that is created in the introduction of the film’s large ensemble of characters, the middle section suffers from a lack of variation and constant gunfights. Even though Wheatley describes the film as “mercilessly short”, he is nonetheless unable to bring the repetitive second act to a satisfying conclusion in time for the slightly underwhelming final twist. Similarly to High Rise, the enclosed environments that Wheatley has grown accustomed to utilising in recent projects may well heighten the chaos of his situations, but he often fails to develop the characters within them to their full extent.

Oxford Men battle to Boat Races victory

0

Oxford’s men’s boat claimed victory in the 163rd Men’s Boat Race after a tactically complex race on the Thames.

Cambridge were seeking their first back-to-back wins of the century, while Oxford were seeking revenge for their defeat last year—as well as the Women’s defeat earlier on in the afternoon.

Both crews got off to a strong start, but Oxford got the better of the early strokes.

From the starting line, Cambridge had the better route around the course, but Oxford took the most slim of early leads off the start.

They had a half-length advantage, but Cambridge were resilient and refused to be left behind.

Such was the physicality of the race that both boats were excruciatingly close together. It was left to the coxes, watching calmly, to observe their races and manage their tactics.

Light blue oars almost clashed with dark blue as neither crew wanted to yield, but it was Cambridge who were forced wide. The dark blue crew took the inside, advantageous line.

Cambridge had to rally as Oxford consolidated their better line and subsequent better pace. Two seconds was the difference between the boats, despite Cambridge’s superior stroke rate—36 to 34.

At the ten minute mark, Oxford held that inside line, but again Cambridge refused to be blown away, keeping up their pace to maintain touching distance.

However, as the race edged into its final stages, Oxford pulled away once more. They left clear water between the two boats, and Cambridge’s waters were choppy as the light blue crew battled in the wake of Oxford’s oars.

Even as Oxford bore down onto the finish, both boats were well-matched in terms of speed, but Oxford’s start and early tactical triumph handed the men’s boat victory in a time of 16:59.

The victory goes some way to mitigate the disappointment of the women’s defeat earlier in the day after the Blues boat hit a crab with their first stroke.

Oxford battled on but Cambridge took the win in record time.

The results mark a complete reversal of last year, when the women won convincingly on choppy waters, while the Cambridge men’s boat edged out Oxford’s to win the second race.

 

Oxford Women beaten in the Boat Race

1

After a hard-fought race on the Thames this afternoon, Cambridge edged past OUWBC to take the trophy, breaking a three-year Oxford winning streak.

The race, fought across the stretch of the Thames between Putney Bridge and Chiswick Bridge, saw Oxford’s woman fall quickly behind the Cambridge team in the opening lengths of the race, giving Cambridge clear water around the Thames’ bends between Putney and Hammersmith.

By ten minutes into the race, Oxford was over fifteen strokes behind the Cambridge boat, making it difficult for them to gain any ground.

The Cambridge team finished in a time of 18:34, to Oxford’s 19:05, setting a new record for the Women’s race, and beating the Cambridge men’s 2015 time.

This year saw both boats make it to the finish line without taking on water – the fate that unfortunately befell the Cambridge Women’s team last year.

The races go ahead today despite initial concerns that an unexploded WWII bomb would lead to their cancellation.

Ashton Brown, CUWBC President said: “I couldn’t have done it without the amazing team I have. We felt a bit robbed last year, and it’s amazing to win. I had a really tough year this year, but they helped me through it all”.

UPDATE: Boat Races set to go ahead after discovery of unexploded WWII bomb

1

Today’s Cancer Research UK Boat Races are set to go ahead after an unexploded WWII-era bomb, found on the banks of the River Thames, called the event into question.

A concrete decision is yet to be made, but indications from organisers and police suggest today’s Boat Races will take place as planned.

The unexploded wartime bomb was discovered yesterday afternoon (1 April) close to Putney Bridge, West London.

The Metropolitan Police confirmed that officers were called to the scene after receiving a report from a member of the public reporting the presence of “what they thought to be a World War Two ordnance on the Chelsea shorelines by Putney Bridge”.

Police were forced to wait until the Thames river tide receded at 01:00 BST before they could inspect the area.

Organisers and police say that the event will continue as planned, though some spectator areas may have to be closed if they are deemed to pose a threat to public safety.

Sources close to the Boat Race teams suggest that the clubs have not received official directives from the event organisers.

Speaking after the announcement of the unexploded bomb, Cambridge University Boat Club President Lance Tredell took to Twitter to comment.

While not explicitly addressing the reports, he described the camp as “relaxed, focussed and ready to race”.

This is a breaking news story. This article will be updated with further information as the story develops.