Monday 21st July 2025
Blog Page 1024

The Oxonian Dandy: Hats

Dante OKeefe
-
0
The Oxonian Dandy: Hats

Perhaps on a breezy evening, the dandy would ponder to himself as he strolled: “What can I don atop my pretty tête on this dark night?” When walking back late from one’s favourite establishment on Park End Street, what better article to have up one’s sleeve than a hat? Of course, with a floppy bucket hat or a baseball cap, this indeed would be possible – perhaps saving you £2 on putting an extra item in the cloakroom. However, these hats have become all too common in recent years and months, and, sadly, these articles can only really be worn these days ironically. The glimpse of a young, misguided chap wearing some ‘wavey’ printed bucket hat or a Yankees snap-back is a truly sorry sight.

Much wiser is the man who pays the extra cloakroom fee and can walk home in gleeful bliss with his saffron yellow bowler, furnished with an azure parrot feather, poised nonchalantly upon his glossy barnet – those two pounds will make him feel a thousand more!

As I have previously asserted on the issue of layering, the important consideration for chapeauage lies not in wearing a topper for its practical merit, but rather for its fashionable usefulness. You don’t want to wear your sou’wester because it’s raining; you want to wear your sou’wester because the dandelion yellow clashes beautifully with your purple cable-knit jumper.

A hat can really complete an outfit. Many formal halls require suits to be worn. If you’ve got a pin-stripe number lurking in the depths of the wardrobe, why not get out your fedora? Twin it with a sinister violin case and the kitchen staff will give you all the custard pies you like. Alternatively, if you’re going down to support the college rugby team, why not complement those wellies and barbour with a panama? Whirl it around your head in a great, looping circle as you belt out one of the college’s chants for a really engaged appearance.

Millinery, of course, comes in all manner of forms. Some hats have surprising and valuable surplus uses. While I wear my green paisley bandana primarily because I’m trying to give off a whiff of my virility, it also keeps my floppy fringe out of my eyes. At the same time, though when I pluck my straw boater from my hat-stand I am motivated by the desire to look sophisticated and elegant at my great-aunt’s third wedding by fusing the hat with my piped blazer, I can also slip the telephone numbers that I get from her friends in the orange ribbon of the boater. It really is a win-win.

With bonnetry, the world really is your oyster. Take inspiration from across the pond with a ten-gallon or perhaps a sombrero to add an element of the New World to your outfit. Whatever happens, make sure your titfer is bold and adventurous. Plumage is always welcome. There are few rules with hats – just remember the words of Frank, Bing and Dean in Robin and the Seven Hoods: “A hat’s not a hat, till it’s tilted”.

Cambridge Say ‘Yes’ to NUS

Daniel Kodsi
-
0
Cambridge Say ‘Yes’ to NUS

Cambridge narrowly voted to remain affiliated with the NUS in a referendum called by the Cambridge University Student Union, Varsity reported this afternoon.

Cambridge saw record turnout for the referendum, with more than 6100 voting in total, a turnout of about 29 per cent of the student body. The ‘Yes’ campaign won by a margin of just under five per cent, 3183 in favour of remaining affiliated with 2884 opposed. 115 votes were left blank.

Adam Crafton and Jack May, co-founders of the ‘Let Cambridge Decide’ campaign, told Varsity, “We are of course disappointed not to have seen this through and secured the disaffiliation vote. By calling this referendum, opening up this debate and engaging so many Cambridge students in the issues at hand, we can be hugely proud of ourselves.

“We’d like to thank all those campaigners who have offered so much in their support, participation, encouragement and commitment throughout the last few weeks.

“We believe that we have awoken the Cambridge student community to the challenges facing Jewish students on British campuses in 2016 and that is an immensely satisfying achievement. It has been a draining challenge at times but hugely rewarding.

“Congratulations, of course, should go to the Remain campaign. I truly hope they honour their campaigning promises to fight for Jewish students within the National Union of Students [NUS].

“However, our concerns persist. Today it has emerged that the President Elect Malia Bouattia was investigated by NUS for anti-semitism last year. Her punishment of an informal warning and an apology does not suffice. Moreover, it is appalling that the millions of students she will represent nationwide were not informed that this investigation took place. It it to the utmost credit of the student media that they exposed this. It would, once again, appear to demonstrate conclusive evidence that the NUS cannot be trusted to confront anti-Semitism.

“It is vital that the NUS do not see this vote as a legitimisation of the direction their organisation is taking but instead see it as a mandate from a very  prestigious university to be allowed one last chance to secure the reforms that Jewish students deserve.”

The Oxford University Student Union has called a referendum on NUS affiliation, to be held Sixth Week Tuesday through Thursday. Results will be announced Thursday evening. In a survey conducted during First Week, Cherwell found that 57 per cent of respondents were in favour of disaffiliation, with only 29 per cent wishing to remain affiliated.

Building projects not worth it

Stephen Hawes
-
0
Building projects not worth it

Large university building works, like the new Blavatnik and Said buildings, may not improve students’ overall experience, a recent study by the Universities of Manchester and Kingston concluded.

The paper, published earlier this month, focussed on technological innovation and flexible teaching spaces. It criticised universities for prioritising their income over improvements to the quality of teaching, quoting that UK universities spent £2.5 billion on their estates in the year 2014-15.

Following with this trend, Oxford colleges and faculties continue to invest in new buildings and extensions. St Hilda’s recently announced plans for a £10 million revamp of its riverside campus, featuring conference rooms and new teaching spaces. Magdalen’s Longwall Library, which was opened this month by the Duke of Cambridge, is yet another of Oxford’s recent building projects.

These projects pale in comparison to the considerable sums spent on buildings like the new Blavatnik School of Government, which cost around £30 million, and the Said Business School, costing more than £23 million.

Dr Steven Jones, one of the researchers who produced the paper said, “The sums being spent by universities on new buildings are eye watering, but the jury’s still out on how much difference they really make to students’ learning. One problem is that evaluations tend to ask questions like, “Has income per square metre improved?”, rather than “have there been pedagogical gains?

“When we invited students to reflect more closely, responses were mixed. For example, students appreciated having new spaces for collaborative learning, but they didn’t always understand exactly what they should be doing in those spaces. “In college, you knew what everything was for,” said one.

“‘Communication is crucial,” Dr Steven Jones added. “The danger is that once the ribbon is cut at the grand opening event, staff and students are left to figure out for themselves how the new spaces can be used to best effect. Technology is a good example. Many staff were nervous about relying on new equipment without dedicated technical support, but students repeatedly told us that the mode of delivery wasn’t important. What mattered more to them was the content of the course and the enthusiasm with which it was taught.’”

The paper is supported by a survey of 212 students from Russell Group universities, in which only 5 per cent said new building works were the main necessity in improving their student experience.

Balliol fresher Nicola Dwornik affirmed this, telling Cherwell, “I don’t see much point in university building works. Arguably having more work spaces where students can study is always a bonus, and provides that sometimes much needed variation.

“Perhaps, money could be spent to extend our online range of articles so works before 2012 are available online, so one doesn’t need to trek to the Sackler to find out that the classics library doesn’t even have a paper copy of them either.”

Mortarboards deemed too dangerous to throw

Philip Pope
-
0
Mortarboards deemed too dangerous to throw

The University of East Anglia (UEA) has advised students against throwing mortarboards at graduation ceremonies this year, stating student safety as the reason for this recommendation.

Instead of following the tradition of throwing mortarboard in the air after graduating, UEA has suggested imitating this gesture for a photograph. Professional photographers could then edit the image to make it look like mortarboards have been thrown above the students’ heads while limiting the risk of injuries.

UEA commented, “We have taken this step because in each of the last two years students have suffered facial injuries.” However, there is no readily available national data on the frequency of mortarboard related injuries at UK graduation ceremonies.

The University backed up their advice, stating, “last year a student needed treatment in A&E.”

“It is only right that they offer students the option of Photoshopping other objects to appear thrown above their heads – a fridge perhaps.”

Josh Gowdy

When faced with accusations of restricting students’ freedom with a ban on mortarboard throwing, UEA replied that “if individuals or small groups want to throw their mortarboards they can, but we don’t think doing it in groups of around 250 students is sensible.”

A student from St Anne’s expressed regret that Oxford hasn’t followed East Anglia’s lead, but opted to remain anonymous fearing backlash from caffeinated and stressed finalists.

“I find it hard to believe the University’s claim that they take student welfare seriously when they don’t even act to stop overzealous students launching medieval pointed frisbees at other students” the student said. “Besides, anything to take the fun out of graduation should be swiftly enacted. Students don’t seem to realise that it is not a time for celebration – the only thing that should be on your mind is how you are going to spend the next few years of your life paying off thirty grand of student debt in your unfulfilling consultancy job.”

Responding to the idea to digitally add mortarboards above posing students, Maths student Josh Gowdy voiced subdued excitement over the possibilities generated by this technique. “If they are doing it with mortarboards, surely it is only right that they offer students the option of Photoshopping other objects to appear thrown above their heads – a fridge perhaps.”

Shepherd and Woodward declined to comment when asked if their products could lead to injuries among groups of celebrating students. The Oxford subfusc provider and photography company Ede & Ravenscroft were also contacted, but declined to answer as to whether they viewed Photoshop as a feasible alternative to the act of throwing hats into the air.

University staff strike over low pay

Sophie Jordan
-
0
University staff strike over low pay

Members of the University of Oxford and Oxford Brookes staff went on strike on May 25 and 26 over a pay offer dispute.

The nation-wide strike initiated by the University and College Union (UCU) took the form of a picket outside the University Science Area and along the whole of the Old Road Campus in Headington, and was held mostly by lecturers although these were joined by other members of staff.

Oxford Mail reported the presence of approximately 30 protestors in Headington, but the total size of the walkout cannot be assessed until pay deduction forms are filled in by those who participated, which will only be done after the two days of action.

It has also been announced that staff will be working according to their contracts from this point onward, rejecting opportunities of extra working hours and stopping the usual replacement process which sees staff taking over the classes of absent colleagues for example.

The dispute is a response to the offer which was made by the Universities and Colleges Employers’ Association (UCEA) to increase pays by 1.1 per cent, which the UCU regarded as “an insult”, claiming that most universities could afford to pay their staff much more than they do. This percentage however, would not apply to staff of Oxford colleges, as these have their own pay arrangements with their tutors, and UCEA explained that staff with lower pay had been offered a 5.1 per cent increase to respond to current inflation levels.

“The situation is more drastic in Oxford because of the extremely high cost of living.”

Garrick Taylor

Similar action had already been taken in November 2014, when university staff from all areas of the UK went on strike to demand a change in pension schemes. The UCU has announced that, as in 2014 when lecturers and tutors had then decided to boycott paper correction, causing a disruption in the normal timetable for exam marking, university staff may resort to such action if the dispute is not solved by a positive agreement on their side.

Garrick Taylor, vice-president of Oxford UCU who was also at the picket on Old Road Campus, told Cherwell, “The amount of picketers was larger than the last strike we had in 2013 – implying anger over pay is increasing.

“We hope the action taken will increase awareness amongst non-members about the pay dispute, in deed we had non members join UCU on the picket line today and ahead of the strike. In addition member meetings are taking place talking about specific issues.”

Commenting on the impact of the differences between Oxford and other institutions on the staff’s demands, Taylor said, “The situation is more drastic in Oxford because of the extremely high cost of living in Oxford and the house prices. This means the below inflation pay rises and extra NI and pension contributions are really causing us to not be able to get on the housing ladder and even struggle with living costs.”

While many were worried about the situation students would be left in, especially at the time of year when most exams take place, it seems that the impact of the strike on the student body was minimal.

A UCEA spokesperson told Cherwell, “Our Higher Education institutions know that the vast majority of their staff understand the current funding environment and can see that the final offer, with substantial extra for the lower paid, endeavours to be fair without putting additional jobs at risk.

“This industrial action is naturally disappointing given the very good pay offer, plus the joint work on gender pay and casual employment that is on the table.”

Oxford University said in a statement, “The University respects the right of individuals to take part in lawful industrial action.”

Review: Mission Burrito

Mabel Whitchurch
-
0
Review: Mission Burrito

It’s not strictly an ‘Oxford’ thing, in fact it’s a San Francisco thing, but nuzzled right next to a delightful vintage book and print shop on St Michael’s street stands Mission Burrito, where the queue of hungry customers spills out of the little red burrito bar at lunchtime just as the fillings of my burritos are often prone to spill out from their too small tortilla encasing.

It is a place of abundance, and after 5 visits to Mission Burrito during my time here, and 10 stamps down on my loyalty card (double stamps on Tuesdays!), my mission was finally complete and I had come to claim my reward. I don’t know what it is about a free burrito, but I felt like I had earned my little parcel of joy, complete with all the ‘extras’ like Mission Burrito’s signature slightly browning guacamole.

Bopping my head by the window seat to the Spanglish pop tunes that really create the ambiance of MB, I wondered at the potential of such a place, wasted on merely selling burritos, salads and tacos. Was there the possibility of making it a burrito bar by day, and a nightclub/bar by night? Under the heady influence of the dance tracks blaring out on the speakers, an image of the same place was transformed before my eyes; I envisioned tequila shots with wedges of lime on sombrero-shaped platters at every corner and a glowing pinata hanging above me. I imagine would have given PT a run for its money.

Dispelling my visions of unashamed cultural appropriation, I turned to my burrito with some distaste. It was hardly authentic, to either Mexico or Oxford, and the rice is a bit stale, the guacamole a just slightly too old, and the corn tortilla wrap a bit disappointing. But, all the same, I devoured it with much delight and with my new loyalty card in pocket, I knew I would be coming back soon on my next mission. With food of variable quality, quick service and low prices, it is the quintessential meal for the busy, hungry student.

Review: Rhinoceros

Ben Ray
-
0
Review: Rhinoceros

There aren’t many plays that leave you speechless as the actors take their final bow: still less that fully deserve a standing ovation. Rhinoceros is undoubtedly one of them. From the very first scene, with a chaos of white-faced comic French characters bouncing off each other and causing utter mayhem, the play same alive and held the audience in the palm of its hand – it was like being in the centre of a humorous Hadron Collider. Playing to a sold-out audience, Gruffdog Theatre created an electric show full of colour, action and laughter, employing everything from puppetry and live music to tunnels underneath the stage, with dance, masks and paint in between.

The humour of the initial first half was kept up throughout, with high energy fun woven throughout the piece that only lagged in the last few scenes. Though perhaps this was apt, as the play grew steadily darker and more onimous: as more and more of the townsfolk morphed into rhinoceroses, the boundary between right and wrong, and what is and isn’t ‘natural’, is blurred. The slow slip from carefree humour into a frightening world of metamorphoses where humans turn into rhinos leads to a stark and surprisingly dark ending of the play, with the lead protagonists Berenger and Daisy (brilliantly played by Jack Bradfield and Madeleine Walker respectively) left as the last humans in a threatening world of rhinos that seem more at home than he does on earth, jolting the audience out of any sense of security they might have had. But then again, this play is constantly playing with the audience – from the trapdoors that suddenly appear in the wonderfully cluttered and eye-catching staging to the incredible puppetry and guitar-violin duet that help with the smooth scene transitions. The sheer creativity in this play is staggering – during an office scene the fast-paced back-and-forth conversation is accompanied by the rhythmically musical beat of a typewriter, used as a drum-kit to drive the dialogue along.

The multitude of diverse, absorbing caricatures are a testament to the huge skills of these actors: from the stuffy ‘professional logician’ (Gaetano Ianetta) to the doddery old man (Oli Clayton) and the spectacular transformation scene of Jean into a rhino (Markus Kinght-Adams), the whole cast paint vivid characters with dexterity and flair. Special mention must go to the producer Conor Jordan and director Pete Sayer, whose incredible inventive theatrical devices helped the play to come alive. In what other play would a telephone be used as a fireman’s ladder to rescue office workers from a collapsed building?

In this absdurdist show full of humour and life, the cast successfully managed to pose searching questions of nature and normality whilst engaging and astounding the audience. What else could you ask for from a play?

Review: OBA Film Festival showcase

James Riding
-
0
Review: OBA Film Festival showcase

The culmination of the Oxford Broadcasting Association (OBA)’s Student Film Festival, it was a time for celebration as the cast and crew of the biggest student films made over the previous year gathered to witness the fruits of their labours on the big screen.

The screening began with the likeable Martin Friar’s First Kiss, which sought to capture the delirium and awkwardness of a Year 7 relationship with rose-tinted nostalgia. Directed with zeal by Megan Gibbons and graded with bold colours, it was a nimble and energetic opener.

Darkness soon set in, however, with the arrival of Joel Scott-Hawkes’ United Strong Alone. In spite of its oxymoronic title, this futuristic wartime drama was arguably the most ambitious in sheer scope, attempting to reconcile a tender examination of mental illness with both a parable about the dangers of organised religion and the tragedy of a nation turned against itself. The lead actor, Rhys Isaac-Jones, and costumes were undeniably impressive, but the absence of any distinct visual threat left it feeling unavoidably half-baked.

Arguably Silas Elliot’s III succeeded better overall on its more modest aims than USA did on its more grandiose ambitions. Liberated by the simplicity of its premise – the characterization of a grieving father – the film could strike out in new visual ways. Evocative images of hot coals and sweeping shots of the landscape gave it some of the most cinematic moments of the entire screening, made even more impressive by the fact that the whole project was accomplished in just 72 hours.

My personal favourite, however, was the kooky Life in Orbit, directed again by Joel Scott-Halkes. A thoroughly off-kilter premise seemingly inspired by the real-life discovery of Richard III underneath a car park, Orbit treated the viewer to a look inside a roadside restaurant where all is not as it seems. It managed to be funny, eerie and confidently directed, and although the ending once again felt a little rushed, the sharply-written monologue delivered by a medieval king back from the grave which followed was a satisfactory substitute.

Custom Built, directed by Alex Darby, asks a universal question: if a bike is changed, part-by-part, until it is completely new, is it still the same bike? The central character, Gemma, was well-drawn, and the film featured some lovely music, but occasionally the scenes tended to drag on longer than they needed to. Nonetheless, it left me excited to see what Darby and his team will do next. For a Rose was a promising teaser – short, sharp, and sweet, it was a great companion piece for its larger sibling.

Lizzy Mansfield’s Aftermath and Hendrik Ehlers’ Storgē were pleasant surprises, offering exemplary character work in a low-key setting. While both films flirted with moments of visual panache and Storgē took a more futuristic angle, they each remained impressively grounded, allowing their leading double-acts (Kathy Stocker and Calam Lynch, and Mary Higgins and James Aldred respecively) to shine.

Spilt was perhaps the most emotionally powerful of the films on show. Dealing with the fallout of a family torn apart by public scorn and exploring dark themes of abuse, it was genuinely unsettling and tense – a commendable achievement.

The screening concluded with Heaven Knows, written and directed by Florence Hyde. The highest-budget production of the lot, it was a sumptuous looking love letter to the tortured artist. The sets and lighting were outstanding, but the music deserves most acclaim, beautifully composed by Harry Brokensha.

Above all, the sheer variety and standard of the films on offer was remarkable; a testament to the creativity of the writers and directors as well as the belief and support of the OBA in helping them realise their ideas.

Web Series World – The Lizzie Bennet Diaries

Naomi Gee
-
0
Web Series World – The Lizzie Bennet Diaries

Today’s entry is an ode to the first ever web series I watched from start to finish and the one that seemingly kicked off the movement of reinterpreting classic novels for an online audience. The Lizzie Bennet Diaries – the place this all began and my life just became a bottomless pit of online consumption. It was the first YouTube series to win a Primetime Emmy. I write this as if it somehow justifies my behaviour.

The series officially started on the 9th of April 2012, but it didn’t hit Twitter until July that year. The series officially finished with the 100th episode on March the 28th 2013. Looking back, the use of different mediums wasn’t quite as in depth as some more recent web series – which has been nice to appreciate just how far the genre has come. However it was still an important addition to the vlogs and helped to add another dimension to these characters.

Going back to the very beginning. This took an awful lot of scrolling on Twitter.
Going back to the very beginning. This took an awful lot of scrolling on Twitter.

Tweets were used to mark key moments in the development of the plot, and to highlight the innocence of certain characters, as seen in this example when Bing Lee is persuaded to leave Netherfield.

Another key example of characters interacting with fans
Another key example of characters interacting with fans

My favourite part of this series, which to this day remains my favourite adaptation of this particular sub plot, are Lydia Bennet’s videos. Following the development of an increasingly abusive relationship with Mr Wickham and the trials of constantly feeling like the younger less intelligent sister, the casting for this role was exquisite. Wickham was believably charming, while being clearly very screwed up and uncomfortably manipulative. Lydia (played by Mary Kate Wiles) is the perfect mix of annoying extroversion, intense vulnerability and complete lovability.

lydia

This love for Lydia Bennet was shared fairly universally by fans – so much so that she has her own book spin off, delightfully named The Epic Adventures of Lydia Bennet. I think the reason I like this adaptation so much is that at the end of the story, Lydia is not left in an unhappy marriage; the assumed just deserves of such a flirt and rather is allowed to develop from her immaturity. The audience is also encouraged to see that the psychology of this character is much more complex than may first be apparent.

Elsewhere casting continued to be on point. Jane Bennet is the epitome of sweetness and manages to perfectly convey the possibility of mistaken attraction for just general niceness. Her way of coping with heartbreak is equally enchanting. Her manic insistence that everything is completely fine, particularly in the episode ‘snickerdoodles‘, is one of the most realistic and touching adaptations of a nice person dealing with rejection that I think I have ever seen. Ashley Clements playing Lizzie Bennet is lightly teasing and a great grounded central character. Caroline Lee (played by Jessica Jade Andres) is perfectly dislikeable.

Caroline being characteristically nosy
Caroline being characteristically nosy

Lizzie is seen to develop as a character significantly through her individual tweets. Her dedication to her studies and addiction to tumblr make her the perfect Lizzie Bennet of the 21st Century.

lizzie

All in all, The Lizzie Bennet Diaries is an important cornerstone of the world of Jane Austen adaptations and the use of the vlog as a medium for telling stories. It spawned later series such as Emma Approved and Welcome to Sanditon and while the latter did begin to feel a little inauthentic in its delivery, both were significant stages of this ever blossoming genre.

The NUS isn’t working – and it won’t anytime soon

Henrique Laitenberger
-
0
The NUS isn’t working – and it won’t anytime soon

Much ink has been spilled on the NUS, Malia Bouattia and the surge in Student Unions seeking disaffiliation from the body as a consequence of her election. OUSU’s own Becky Howe stated in the heated debate that preceded the decision to hold a referendum that the controversial new president was not in itself a reason to leave the NUS. She is fundamentally correct. This vote should not be about a personnel issue, but the structures that underpin it. Seen from this perspective, the conclusion is clear: the election of Bouattia was not an accident of history. It is the logical consequence of an organisation that has failed to comply with its mission, swapping genuine representation of students for narrow factional interests of student activists.

“For an NUS that works for you!” This was the ambitious slogan for my campaign to be elected NUS Delegate at my alma mater King’s College London in 2013. At the time, it captured my faith in the NUS: accommodating roughly 600 Student Unions across the United Kingdom, I felt that this was an organisation with a stunning capacity to deliver tangible benefits for students on every level – be it on fees, costs, equal access, tenancy rights, welfare, career and not least academic services. It was in this spirit that I fought and won the campaign and travelled to Liverpool for national conference in April 2014.

The reality of NUS Conference was rather sobering: the lion’s share of the motions presented to delegates focused on political issues of marginal relevance to the everyday experience of students at university, such as public ownership of banks, the condemnation of UKIP, and the obligatory motion on Palestine. Topics such as improving contact hours, guarantor schemes for international students, the expansion of soft skills training provision for students and the abolition of re-sit fees were drowned out as conference heatedly debated everyday politics. This was amplified by the infamous political factionalism that underpinned the conference, pitting representatives of organisations with such sonorous acronyms such as NCAFC, NOLS or AWL against one another while vying for seats on the National Executive Council or the Block of 15. One of the principal candidates for NUS President even managed to hold a candidacy speech without mentioning the word “students” once. An impressive, yet telling feat. While the eventual re-election of moderate Toni Pearce saw the convention end on a cordial note, the overall experience left non-factional delegates disillusioned.

While many may find these tales typical of the shenanigans of modern student politics, there is a more troubling reality behind them: the NUS has for long been structurally unable to properly work for students. It shuns accountability and democracy by rejecting a “One Member, One Vote” system to elect its President. As a result, factional infighting prevails within its executive bodies whose members primarily seek to advance narrow partisan interests irrespective of whether they improve the lives of the more than two million students they represent. These officers are in turn elected by delegates returned on minimal turnouts in local SUs, supported by coordinated fringe activist groups. Marred by this infighting and detached from the lives of the people it is supposed to represent, the NUS has long ceased to be an effective and powerful national voice for students. This is lamentable since there is a need for effective and constructive national student representation, particularly in an age where academia is evolving as rapidly as today. Today, the NUS is as, if not more, dysfunctional as during my undergraduate years – while demanding more than twice the affiliation fees from SUs. Bouattia’s election is the logical conclusion of this development.

The NUS, as it is now, is not working for students. It has not done so for several years, if not decades, and there is little hope for this state of affairs to change in the near future. Students should send a clear message and reject the failed institution that is the NUS – and with it the self-seeking politics that have led to the loss of the national student voice in Britain.

1...1,0231,0241,025...2,515Page 1,024 of 2,515

Support Student Journalism

Cherwell is Oxford’s oldest independent newspaper, established in 1920. We are entirely student-run. By supporting us, you will contribute to keeping our paper in print and online. Every donation makes a difference.

Donate

Explore

Follow us

More

Oxford Student Publications Limited © 2025 - All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy

Website by James Ashley