Sunday 26th April 2026
Blog Page 1069

Review: ‘Inspiring Impressionism: Daubigny, Monet, Van Gogh’; Scottish National Gallery

0

‘Inspiring Impressionism’, is a major exhibition currently on at the Scottish National Gallery in Edinburgh. It tracks the development of Impressionism through the careers of Charles-François Daubigny, Claude Monet, and Vincent Van Gogh, respectively proto-, archetypal, and post-Impressionist. Each represents a distinct phase of the movement, between which the exhibition draws connections while covering half a century of painting.

The first room of the exhibition is focused primarily on Daubigny, the least well-known of the trio, and confronts the curator’s greatest challenge: convincing us that he is as important as his successors. His landscapes are well painted, with a great feeling for complex skies, thick clouds interacting with bright suns. The horizon line is often midway down the composition, stressing the dominance of nature over man, a notion inherited from the Romantics, who had always enjoyed popularity in the Salon. Indeed, Daubigny eventually became a juror on the annual Academy show, his landscapes having transitioned from being deemed aesthetically radical to fine examples of the French School, not so very far from Constable. To a contemporary audience, the upset Daubigny caused is hard to fathom: his views of the Seine, Oise, and Auvers are detailed, naturalistic with brushwork carefully rendering trees and foliage. ‘Banks of the Oise at Auvers’ (1863) is the best of them, the thicket of dark green trees to the left introducing a note of cool menace to the tranquil atmosphere. Daubigny appears interested only in capturing the countryside’s transient beauty.

Monet's 'Sunset on the Seine at Lavacourt'. Source: wikimedia commons
Monet’s ‘Sunset on the Seine at Lavacourt’. Source: Wikimedia Commons

Of course, Monet could be accused of the same, his obsessive painting of haystacks and ponds more concerned with light than humanity, but his bold approach, with dramatic, sweeping brushstrokes and a promiscuous, burning palette, is what gives his canvases their dramatic impetus. There are no true Monet masterpieces on display in the exhibition, but his ‘Sunset on the River Seine at Lavacourt, Winter Effect’ (1880) is the finest here; the orange sun, its rays reflected on the river, conveyed with rough daubs of paint straight from the tube, recalls Japanese prints in its intensity of colour. It acknowledges plainly Monet’s pivotal earlier work, ‘Impression, Sunrise’ (1872) (its title inspiring the name of the movement as a whole), which boasted a similarly striking sun illuminating an otherwise muddy landscape. In comparison, Daubigny is too careful, wishing to portray the leaves in the trees, when Monet knew we see in generalities, his great aesthetic discovery. Daubigny’s paintings which were contemporaneous to Monet’s are looser, dirtier, more clearly ‘impressions’ than earlier works, but still fundamentally in good taste and acceptable to the Salon at a time when Monet and his compatriots like Pissaro (also in the exhibition) were being rejected.

The last key room places Daubigny alongside van Gogh, the latter an admirer of the former, even painting his gardens, and positions him as the ‘natural’ conclusion to a process Daubigny had begun. There is no deviation from the traditional, evolutionary art historical narrative used to explain Impressionism, nor any challenge posed to the idea that the style was about nature: landscapes are the only genre represented, ignoring Monet’s frank, bruising cityscapes. The exhibition offers a neat summary of itself here, hanging Daubigny’s ‘Fields in the Month of June’ (1870) in the centre of a triptych flanked on the left by Monet’s ‘Field with Poppies’ (1881) and to the right by ‘Poppy Field, Auvers-sur-Oise’ (1890) from Van Gogh. The motif of a poppy field is central to all three works and allows for us to understand just as clearly the differences between them as it does the similarities – Daubigny’s fastidious observance of each flower, Monet’s fluid, gestural approach, Van Gogh’s penetrating, subversive, graphic depiction. The determined experimentation of Monet and Van Gogh contrast with Daubigny’s innovation inside accepted boundaries, and this aesthetic clash off-balances the exhibition.

van Gogh's 'Poppy Field, Auvers-sur-Oise'. Source: wikimedia commons
van Gogh’s ‘Poppy Field, Auvers-sur-Oise’. Source: Wikimedia Commons

As a kind of post-script, the SNG has as its final room a recreation of Daubigny’s Studio Boat, from which he painted many of his landscapes. It’s bizarre, almost childish, not terribly illuminating and robs a whole room from the exhibition space, leading one to speculate there were not enough paintings to fill the walls. Certainly, the exhibition is composed of minor or middle-ranking canvases and the Impressionist and Post-Impressionist galleries in the main part of the SNG, while smaller, are superior in their range and quality.

‘Inspiring Impressionism’ makes a convincing case that Daubigny was an important influence on the Impressionists, but despite selective quotes praising Daubigny, taken from letters by Monet and Van Gogh, it never quite explains why he alone is focused on and not say, Gustave Courbet. The gap in quality between the three painters is undeniable and makes for an interesting but not wholly cohesive exhibition, seeming to omit as much as it includes.

What can we learn from the Norrington Table?

0

Head of the river and top of the Norrington – Oriel really have it all this year.

But there is something else remarkable about Oriel’s accession, besides that it gives the proprietors of Oxford’s most famous statue yet more reason to gloat: it marks the first time in fifteen years – since Balliol took the crown in 2001 – that the college at the top of the Norrington Table is not one of Oxford’s five richest undergraduate colleges.

After all, what is it that the Norrington Table really measures? Cherwell runs you through the trends and factoids in this year’s academic rankings.

Where the fun goes to die

Poor Merton – if only one more finalist had earned a 1st instead of a 2.1, they would be back on top, having dropped down nearly to the bottom of last year’s rankings. Still, that would have placed them nowhere near their record score of 77.7% back in 2007/8. Rounding out the top five are Magdalen, University, and Trinity.

Better luck next time

Pembroke dons must be breathing a sigh of relief. After last year’s humiliation of losing by 3.1 percentage points – the same amount separating 12th-place Oriel and 29th-place St Edmund Hall – they are replaced by Queen’s at the foot of the Norrington. Mansfield and a few of the ‘St’s – Anne’s, Hilda’s, and Peter’s – will be providing company at the bottom of the Table.

I knew I should’ve read maths…

No, the maths students assure you, horror in their eyes, you do not wish you were reading maths. But is there truth to the claim that it’s easier to get a first in the sciences than humanities? The statistics from 2015’s Gazette would certainly seem to suggest so: 38% of mathematical, physical and life scientists graduating last year managed a first, whilst only 30% of humanities students, 29% of medical scientists, and 26% of social scientists managed the same. Moral of the story? Yet another reason not to read PPE, whose 22% first rate was easily the lowest of any of Oxford’s popular courses.

The tyranny of wealth? Of popularity?

Actually, not so much. Of Oxford’s ten richest undergraduate colleges, only three (Merton, Magdalen, and Univ) break the top ten Norrington performers – whilst two (Christ Church and and Queen’s) can be found in the bottom third of the Table. On the other hand, six of Oxford’s poorest undergraduate colleges can be found in the bottom ten, so the data cuts both ways.

Equally murky is the debate over whether oversubscribed colleges tend to outperform: six of Oxford’s ten colleges with the lowest percentage of direct applicants accepted made the Norrington top ten – which almost has you wondering about the four that didn’t: are their tutors sure they’re accepting the right applicants?

With age, wisdom

The old adage: Wisdom before beauty. Except Oxford’s oldest colleges also tend to be its most beautiful. They are also its best academic performers. Wealth might not be a determining factor, but how about date of foundation? Six of Oxford’s oldest colleges – all founded before 1500 – made the top third of the Norrington. Meanwhile, eight of Oxford’s nine latest additions (St Catherine’s aside) – none older than a spry 140 years –  placed in the bottom half of the Table.

Oxford researcher suggests Donald Trump has stronger psychopathic traits than Hitler

1

An Oxford researcher has pegged Republican Party’s presidential hopeful Donald Trump at 171 on the PPI-R test for psychopathic traits.

The study, which was drawn up by Oxford’s Dr Kevin Dutton, saw him and a collection of political experts estimate Trump’s response to 56 psychometric questions. The results place him two points above Adolf Hitler, who scores 169.

The test “does not say whether someone is a psychopath,” explains Dr Dutton, “it scores them on eight traits that contribute to a psychopathic character.

“Both great and terrible leaders score higher than the general population for psychopathic traits, but it is the mix of those traits that determines success.

“Some of those traits, such as fearlessness or stress immunity, can be positive. Others, such as blame externalisation or being unconcerned about the future, are more likely to be negative. One, cold-heartedness, can contribute to good and bad leadership.”

Trump scored higher than Hitler on “social influence” and “fearlessness”, but lower on traits usually considered bad, such as “Machiavellian egocentricity” and “cold-heartedness”. One trait both figures share is “blame externalisation”, a common feature of populist politics.

The findings, which were published in the journal Scientific American Mind, also measured the estimated score of Hillary Clinton, who was found to have a very high score for “Machiavellian egocentricity”. On the measure for “fearless dominance”, traditionally associated with strong presidencies, Trump’s score was higher.

The study is another example of the worldwide Trump phenomenon reaching Oxford, after students organised a protest against his candidacy in March. Dr Dutton, who included Trump as part of a wider study on the relationship between psychopathy and political leadership, was nonetheless keen to stress that “in the end, while both score relatively highly, it will be up to voters to decide if whether their mix of positive and negative traits should send them to the Oval Office.”

Oxford climbs Greatest Sporting Cities list following United’s promotion

0

Oxford has jumped nineteen places in the list of ‘greatest sporting cities in the UK’ following Oxford United’s promotion to League One.

Oxford rose from fortieth to twenty-first in the latest rankings, now ranking as the fifth best city in the South East. The ranking, compiled by ESPN and the University of Bath, compares cities based on how enjoyable they are for their sporting supporters. The 2016 list puts Oxford alongside Portsmouth, Middlesbrough and Derby.

The city received the top score in the country for ‘participation’ – number of adults regularly playing sport – and claimed third position in the ‘value for money’ category.

Leicester topped the UK’s Greatest Sporting City ranking this year following Leicester Team’s victory of the Premier League last year.

Oxford United chairman Darryl Eales told the Oxford Mail, “It’s fantastic news for the city and shows Oxford, and indeed Oxfordshire, is very much on the up.

“Oxford United are proud to bear the name of this wonderful, historic and world-renowned city and to play its full part in helping create a real community spirit based on building a club that is at the heart of the community and seeks to make a positive difference to all.”

Breaking: Oriel tops 2015/16 Norrington Table

0

Oriel has topped this year’s Norrington Table, moving up from 12th place. The top five colleges, in descending order, are  Oriel, Merton, Magdalen, Univ and Trinity.

In a year of substantial movement throughout the table, Merton rose significantly, from 27th back up to 2nd, while Pembroke, bottom three years in a row, rose to fourteenth. In bottom place were Queen’s, down from 25th.

Oriel’s Provost, Moira Wallace, commented, “These results are a testament to the hard work of our students. We are very proud of their achievements, and of the excellent support provided by the College’s Tutors and staff”.

In a statement on their website, Trinity College posted, “Our warmest congratulations to all our Finalists and their tutors on an excellent set of results this year, which sees Trinity placed fifth out of the thirty undergraduate colleges in the Norrington Table for 2016. Our thanks go also to all the college staff who have supported the students throughout their time at Trinity.

“Highlights of the results included some subjects (Biochemistry, Chemistry, Economics and Management, History, Materials Science, Mathematics and Physics) seeing at least half the students graduating with Firsts, and outstanding performances by several students who received prestigious University Gibbs Prizes (in English and in History). We are proud to celebrate the achievements of all the eighty-five students in this cohort, and look forward to seeing them back in Trinity for their graduation ceremony.”

Henry Shalders, an Oriel third year, told Cherwell, “Sorry, what? Oriel is top of the Norrington Table? This comes as quite a shock.”

The Norrington Table, an unofficial academic ranking of colleges, is calculated using a points system for the degrees undergraduate students were awarded in that year. A First Class degree gains the college five points, with three points for an Upper Second, two for a Lower Second and none for a Third or a Pass. The total score is expressed as a percentage of the maximum possible score, which is all Finals candidates multiplied by five.

The full table of results can be found here.

Government report recommends Oxford to Cambridge expressway

0

The government’s Department for Transport has published a set of investigation results which explore possibilities of linking existing roads between Oxford and Cambridge via Bedford and Milton Keynes, improving journey times by up to 30 minutes.

Currently it takes on average more than two hours to reach Cambridge by car from Oxford. There is no direct train route and the only direct bus, the X5, takes nearly four hours. In March of this year, Lord Adonis, chair of the National Infrastructure Commission, received backing from the former Chancellor George Osborne for the funding to construct a direct rail line between the two cities.

The new study emphasised the value of a “knowledge economy” which is comprised of highly skilled workers who need close geographical proximity or good transport links in order to collaborate. It predicted that congestion along existing roads from Oxford to Cambridge could increase by around 40% by 2035, resulting in even longer journey times.

However, Danny Dorling, professor of human geography at the University of Oxford opposes the plans in the repot on environmental grounds, arguing instead for improved rail links. He told Cherwell, “Building more roads leads to more road congestion and more firms choosing to move freight by road rather than rail, all of which increases carbon pollution.”

“40,000 people a day drive over the green belt to Oxford. Adding more cars and lorries to that suggests a lack of imagination to me. But building more homes on the edge of Oxford so people don’t have to drive from Milton Keynes and then use the park and ride would be far better.”

He also highlighted the a problem of road protestors slowing development work, “one thing they should do if they really do plan to build link roads and widen other roads is factor in the costs of the expected road protestors. Road protestors in the 1990s made schemes such as this uneconomic. It is possible that the new generation will be far more pliant than mine was, but I would expect widespread protest on environmental grounds. The route they are suggesting lies between two of the most famous road protests in the UK.”

Bridget Fox, from the Campaign for Better Transport, criticized the plan for not properly considering the needs of cyclists and bus users. She said in a statement, “Oxford and Cambridge have pioneered transport policies based on providing alternatives to car dependency. To build new road connections drawing more traffic into the area risks undermining their achievements.”

Oxford University news and information office and the NIH Oxford-Cambridge Scholars Program have been contacted for comment.

 

Vice-Chancellor moves into Clarendon Building

1

Oxford’s Vice-Chancellor Louise Richardson has moved offices, from a Wellington Square location once described as a “concrete office block that would look more at home in Cold War East Berlin” to Broad Street’s Clarendon Building. University sources have suggested that the change in architectural style may have been a significant motivation for the move.

The Wellington Square offices have housed the administrative staff of Oxford University since 1974, including the Vice-Chancellor, while the Clarendon Building was constructed in 1712-13 for Oxford University Press before it moved to its present Jericho building in the 1830s.

One university source, speaking to the Oxford Mail, commented that the architecture of the Wellington Square offices may well have been a key factor in precipitating the move: “You come to Oxford thinking of the Bodleian and the Sheldonian Theatre but then visitors of the Vice-Chancellor get brought to Wellington Square, which doesn’t look good.”

A university spokesman stated that the reopening of the Weston Library last year meant that the new office space was now available.

He added, “This has allowed the small team which supports the Vice Chancellor to be co-located in the Clarendon Building. Using the traditional location as the Vice-Chancellor’s base, close to the heart of the university and many colleges, also allows the university to receive guests from around the world in a location that showcases the institution’s long history and extraordinary architectural heritage.”

A Yank in the UK

1

Editor’s note: Needless to say, our author is American. Cherwell has therefore left in all American spellings for reasons of authenticity.

The great Ernest Hemingway, a fellow Midwesterner, once wrote that you can never truly write about a place until you’ve left it. Recovering both from jet-lag and a vicious hangover, I am safely ensconced in my home country and capable of recounting the past 5 weeks studying abroad at Oxford University’s Magdalen College.

Let it be known that I was not some starry-eyed American desperate for a European adventure. I’ve travelled extensively with my father for work – tasting the shores of Europe, Asia, Central Asia, Central and South America all before hitting my country’s legal drinking age. I’m also a long-time fan of many, now somewhat out-dated, British television shows; I’ve taken full advantage of the change in my Netflix selection to binge watch Miranda, Outnumbered, Cuckoo and of course Absolutely Fabulous. I figured I knew what I was getting into before flying out of Detroit Metro Airport. The cabs would be black, the tea delicious, and the humor dry.

That being said, there are many things I’ve learned, not just about this country, but my own as well. I’ve discovered alcohol tastes a lot better this side of the Atlantic, and it took me longer than I’m comfortable admitting to understand there is no difference between “to-go” and “take away”. Here’s a list, on a spectrum starting with the obvious to the mildly surprising, about my stay abroad:

The Top 7 Things I’ve Learned About Being An American In Oxford

  1. Everyone wants to talk about how I’m American: As a University of Michigan student, I must say I suffered from lack of recognition. My accent may be obvious, but the area where I’m from less so. Few Britons seemed to have heard much about the Midwest – a large swathe of the country that lies somewhere in between Manhattan and San Francisco  – beyond knowing who Eminem is. I hadn’t had one conversation in a pub that didn’t begin with the words, “So you’re an American, are you?”, and finally understood why Brits from my area of Michigan found being singled out for their accent so singularly annoying. The reactions I’ve provoked have ranged from the cheeky (“If you’re an American, why aren’t you fat?”) to the downright insulting (“Are you voting for Donald Trump?”). This wouldn’t be a terrible conversation opener if things actually progressed beyond simply stating where I’m from before lapsing into an uncomfortable silence. Other interactions were less than kind. In line at Sainsbury’s I found myself locked in conversation with an impressively drunk man. I fixed an expression of polite disinterest that served me well until he alerted to the fact that I was, as he put it, a Yank. I was not particularly charmed but this, as it’s an antiquated pejorative. He apologized with the insistence that the term “goes over a lot better” when he uses it in the States.
  1. The City is empty in summer: Of students, at least. Tourism in Oxford puts the industry in Ann Arbor to shame. You’d be hard-pressed to find a more cosmopolitan street than Cornmarket on a Saturday morning in July. A cultural cornucopia Italians, Greeks, Spanish, Chinese and German tourists congeal on the street like plaque in the arteries of those sitting in the McDonalds, the line for which spills onto the street regardless of the hour. Beyond this, I discovered that summer college is by no means considered “real” college. Returning from a night well-spent at the Half Moon, my companions and I spotted an actual Oxford student in the wild. He asked if we were members of the British American Drama Academy, another summer group staying at our college. We replied that we were part of the academic program, which did not go over well. “You’re a Magdalen Academic?”, his voice thick with derision, “I’m a Magdalen Academic. You’re summer school scum!”
  1. It’s impossible to talk about this summer without mentioning violence: In America people are shooting each other in the chests while in England they’re shooting themselves in the foot. In the time that I’ve been here, there were three more shootings that added to this summer’s death toll, two of which added fuel to the #blacklivesmatter movement. This same movement has spread to England, and numerous protests have blocked motorways and tramlines. There have also been several attacks this summer in Germany and France, some of which have been claimed by terrorist organisations. Last week there was a stabbing in London that launched a flurry of concerned emails from parents to the program participants. Mourning international and domestic losses has increasingly become a staple of pop culture. On Bastille Day, another attack in Europe left 84 dead in Nice, and 202 injured, ten of whom were children. The Orlando nightclub shooting claimed 50 lives. During this bloody summer more deaths take place in the span of ten minutes than in military skirmishes of the past, revealing of far more than lax gun laws or mental illness.
  1. Collective memory is definitely a thing: Something I found astonishing about the English was about how often they reference their own history on a daily basis. Granted, we’re a nation that drinks from cans of beer that feature lines from the Pledge of Allegiance and lyrics from ‘The Star Spangled Banner’. Yet the English memory stretches far back and remains fixed in the minds of the present day. My university will be celebrating its bicentennial next year, and it’s quite a big deal. But upon entering the UK I was shocked by how often I’d been referred to as a colonial.
  1. People actually read in Oxford: Who knew? Whether I was walking past coffee shops or park benches, I was so distracted by how many newspapers and books that were being read that I failed to notice the people plastered to their phones and Pokémon Go. As newspapers in America downsize and re-brand to fit into an already crowded online niche, readers in England are cracking open paper — actual paper — and staying informed. As an editor of the last print paper in my city, the sight warmed my heart.
  1. The food is terrible: Sorry Oxford. Limited takeout options in the city and everything closes so damned early. This is by no means a universal rule. Notable exceptions include pizza at the White Rabbit, that Indian place across from Thirst, and select dining options along Cowley Road. I will admit the highlight of many evenings out have been the precious moments alongside the food trucks on High Street. Time will reflect that it was during my first drunken bite of chips, cheese and gravy that I saw the face of God. I found the food at Magdalen itself as inedible as at any college in the United States. Dining hall food is, as with airplane food, convenient and often the only sustainable option. (The outbreak of food poisoning that swept through the programme notwithstanding.)
  1. Stereotypes aren’t always true: I realized early on that stereotypes work both ways, and I went into my study abroad with two in mind. I was aware my American status would be a scarlet letter, and it would come attached with expectations of crudeness, unjustified self-confidence, and the ability to make a public spectacle of myself at a moment’s notice. But also the way Americans envision Britons is exported primarily from the BBC, and involves velvet-smooth accents and tailored suits. Upon arrival, I considered the many tips I’d received and emulated about blending-in and reducing my social footprint. Don’t wear clothes that are too colorful, or have words or brands; don’t be loud or disagreeable. But it would seem the train from Paddington to Oxford came with it’s own floor show in the form of a couple’s quarrel. Minutes before departure an impressive stream of swear words burst forth from a woman several rows ahead of me, the victim of which appeared to be her boyfriend. During the row, the woman to my left glanced at me and raised her eyebrows. I offered her my palm in a universal sign for, “What the hell is this person thinking?” Eventually another passenger had had enough and tactfully pointed out the presence of children aboard. It had all the effects of poking an angry bear and the woman now began to swear with the ferocity of a drunk sailor at a football match. As if to complete my metaphor, a cart of snacks was teetering down the aisle to offer refreshments for the spectators. This anecdote shines, among others, to exemplify that such people exist everywhere.

Festivals: F stands for film – Adam Green’s Aladdin at Latitude

0

While not the best film I saw during the festival Adam Green’s Aladdin captures the place of film at an arts festival at a fundamental level: showcasing unusual and creative projects in an atmosphere prepared to consider them for what they are.

Green’s take on Aladdin may be fairly described as a cross between Kanye West’s ‘runaway’ short and a nostalgia critic skit. However, it deserves more credit than just being considered an overly self-indulgent music video. Similarly its acting is deliberately stunted, rather than just bad, to add to the absurdity and even the more puerile and unfunny aspects are, while still a stumbling block, not quite ‘Freddy Got Fingered’ bad.

From considering Green’s stated inspirations of ‘The Holy Mountain’ and ‘South Park’ you get a pretty good sense of the project: an absurd drama with intriguing visuals which at least tries to comment on life, but also unfortunately with a few too manyknob jokes.

As a film that is supposed to be “like a trip” it achieves the unreality found in psychedelics better than anything else I’ve ever seen. The scenery and props being almost entirely hand painted cardboard and papier-mâché gives the impression of a more grounded reality than similarly stylized animation could. However, Green’s masterstroke for achieving the correct degree of unreality was in overdubbing every voice. It has some good points when it touches on issues of gender inequality and the fear of modern technology, but the occasional sharp observation is lost behind the myriad lines that appear to think they’re smarter than they are.

The mixed quality of commentary can likely be traced to Green’s stated process of “I get pretty stoned and then write for a couple of hours”. Unfortunately blaming a misplaced sense of one’s own intelligence on getting high makes me worry for my own output but I’m not the one to judge that.

Faults aside – Green, as primarily a musician, acted as a gateway in considering film an attraction at an event with music as the traditional focus. Once film is recognized as more of a core experience then ,I hope, that the more traditional forms of it will achieve a better audience as I was disappointed that more people didn’t see Isabelle Sieb’s superb comedic short ‘Three Women Waiting for Death’.

Too bad we can’t have our own team

0

After Tom Mitchell led Great Britain to an historic silver in the first ever men’s Rugby 7s competition at the Olympics last week, followed by Constantine Louloudis’ men’s coxless four team comfortably winning gold, Oxonians in Rio were looking at an already successful games.

Their medal haul would only increase, however, through the successes of the British coxed eight teams, with both the men’s and women’s crews containing Oxonian representation.

Firstly, last Saturday morning, the women’s eight team coxed by Zoe de Toledo earned their first medal in Olympic history, improving on their fourth-placed result at the 2015 World Championships. Though they could not quite find the performance to beat the imperious American crew, who now have claimed their third consecutive gold medal in this event, the British team battled hard to claw their way back from last place at the halfway point to finish second, even making an unlikely victory appear a possibility in the last 500m. In the end, the US pulled away to win comfortably by almost two and a half seconds, whilst Zoe de Toledo’s team managed to hold off Romania in third by 0.12 seconds.

After the success of the women’s crew, Andrew Triggs-Hodge and Paul Bennett took to the water for the men’s event. The race was one of a wholly different character, with Britain leading from start to finish to comfortably take the gold medal ahead of Germany and the Netherlands. It may not quite have been the margin of victory that the Americans enjoyed in the women’s race, but the 1.33 second gap to the silver medallists was more than enough to demonstrate the ease of victory.

Following Saturday’s victory, Triggs-Hodge also now finds himself a three-time Olympic gold medallist, having won the men’s four titles in Beijing and London.

Although the crews of the men’s and women’s coxed eight managed to add to the medal haul of Oxonians competing in Rio, the British men’s hockey team, including Dan Fox, could not quite emulate such successes.

Needing a result against Spain, and hoping that Belgium would complete a 100% record in the group stage against New Zealand, Britain could only manage a 1-1 draw against the Spanish, whilst their exit was confirmed as Belgium succumbed to a 3-1 defeat at the hands of New Zealand.

Despite the loss, Oxonians in Rio have enjoyed remarkable success. The gold and silver of the rowing competitions last Saturday added to those in the rowing and rugby, respectively, earlier last week to complete a set of medals that would place Oxford 29th in the medal table if they were their own team, trumping the likes of Denmark, South Africa, Sweden, and a host of other nations including Britain’s own neighbours Ireland.

With Britain having their most successful overseas games in their history, the Oxonian delegation can share hugely in that pride of triumph.