Tuesday 22nd July 2025
Blog Page 1371

A History of Hollywood’s Most Iconic Dynamic Duos

0

John McDonagh and Brendan Gleeson’s latest joint effort, the bleak black comedy Calvary, has led some people to label their partnership a soon-to-be classic of cinema. Based on the strength of this recent release and their previous film, The Guard, their work together certainly could be one of the great collaborations of the silver screen. Inspired by this, Cherwell decided to look back at the partnerships that have been most interesting and influential in the course of film history:

John Ford and John Wayne (1939 – 1976):

Working together for over 24 years and 21 films, the two Johns produced some of the most genre-defining cowboy Westerns from the 1940’s through to the 1960’s. Whether in Rio Grande, Fort Apache or Stagecoach, the film that launched Wayne’s career as an all-American idol, their partnership was one of the longest lasting in Hollywood. Despite a rocky start, as Ford constantly undermined and bullied Wayne on the set of Stagecoach to illicit real emotions in his acting, their work only went from strength to strength from there. Well, Stagecoach clearly wasn’t that bad a start given Orson Welles said he watched it 40 times in preparation for making his cinematic debut, a little production called Citizen Kane

 

Francis Ford Coppola and Marlon Brando (1972 – 1979):

It goes without saying that Brando’s turn as Vito Corleone in Coppola’s director-debut The Godfather is one of the most iconic, and instantly recognisable, portrayals in cinematic history. But this relationship was more interesting for its difficulties than its successes. Shortly after Brando famously declined the Oscar he won for his role in The Godfather, he also declined to star as a young Vito in another edition of the franchise despite receiving numerous handwritten letters by Coppola begging him to return. But that is nothing compared to the troubles Coppola had with him when making Apocalypse Now. Not only did Brando turn up enormously overweight, despite being cast to play the skeletally thin Kurtz, but he had refused to delay his arrival to allow the sets to be rebuilt after a typhoon, had not read the original book and was demanding drastic rewrites to the ending of the film. And he refused to be on set at the same time as his anarchic co-star Dennis Hopper. All this, whilst being on a one million dollar a week contract. Clearly a challenging relationship, but one that produced two of the most seminal performances of the last century.

  

Robert De Niro and Martin Scorsese (First film together – Mean Streets, 1973):

Mean Streets, Taxi Driver, Raging Bull, The King of Comedy, Goodfellas. Do we need to say anymore? The 1970’s were the decade for the collaborations of Scorsese and De Niro, the point at which both of them were catapulted to the forefront of Hollywood’s respect and praise. A shared interest in the pernicious side of male nature can be seen throughout their eight combined works, and demonstrates a kind of joint mindset that few actor-director partnerships can claim to rival.  Although Leonardo Di Caprio seems like Scorsese’s muse of the moment, his work with De Niro will always be the most exemplary.

 

Harvey Weinstein and the Entirety of Hollywood (1979 – Present):

Harvey Weinstein, co-founder of production company Miramax and Hollywood’s executive producer to go to, is perhaps the most influential man in cinema today. Next to no one else has the money, the connections or the reputation as Harvey – hence what he says go. His talent for aggressively editing films down to their most easily marketable form is legendary, like his refusal to release Gangs of New York until Scorsese cut an entire hour from the running time. Equally, Weinstein has a taste for Oscar-winning fare, having produced The English Patient, Chicago, The King’s Speech and The Artist, all Best Picture winners. To put this influence into numbers, over the last twenty years, seven Oscar winners thanked God in their acceptance speech; thirty thanked Harvey Weinstein.

 

Phillip K. Dick and Science-Fiction Cinema (First film adaptation – Bladerunner, 1982):

Few authors have had as many of their works translated into films, even fewer into as many successful films, both critically and financially, as Phillip K. Dick. A gift to science fiction fans and directors alike, eleven of Dick’s works have been adapted for cinema. From the niche, like A Scanner Darkly or Screamers, to the legendary, Total Recall, Bladerunner or Minority Report, Dick’s works have consistently produced the most prescient and influential science fiction films of all time. And the popularity of his work shows no sign of abating, as Disney is set to release an adaptation of his The King of the Elves in 2016, the film rights for his novel Ubik were recently sold, and Ridley Scott is rumoured to be in talks to create a BBC miniseries based on one of Dick’s works. Sadly he never lived to see any of his works brought to the big screen, but Dick’s works will forever be some of the most fertile source materials for any science fiction director. 

 

Christopher Nolan and Wally Pfister (2000 – Present):

The most current partnership on this list, the partnership of Nolan and Pfister has created the visual aesthetic that has defined Hollywood for the last decade. Working together for seven films, Pfister’s work with Nolan has been nominated for four, and won one, Academy Award. It was Pfister’s prodigious talent as Director of Photography that visualised Nolan’s conception of Gotham, with his slick, meticulous, precise, almost sterile, style brilliantly depicting a city that was hostile, inhospitable and in need of a hero. Pfister is also a great example of humble beginnings, as despite his current success and popularity, he spent much of his career in cinematography shooting straight-to-video erotic thrillers – talk about reversal of fortune. Although parodied by many, few can match the gorgeous and arresting visual style that Pfister’s eye and Nolan’s writing can reach.

Univ 2015 Ball Cancelled

0

The University College Ball, which was set to take place in 2015, has been cancelled because of renovations taking place in the college next year. 

In an email sent out to students from the JCR, it was explained that after, “a meeting with the college today, it has been decided that due to exceptional circumstances surrounding the Goodhart Building renovation next year, we will be unable to host a college ball in 2015.”

It was decided that the ball will be postponed until Trinity term of 2016, but there are hopes other events will be put in its place. In the email, students were told that “a smaller event would provide creative opportunities for anyone interested in organising a college wide social event.”

JCR president, Abigail Reeves, told Cherwell, “College decided to reject our proposal to hold a college Ball on the basis that renovations on the main site would cause a number of logistical problems. As a result the Ball has been postponed to 2016. 

“There is a feeling of disappointment amongst the student body, but we are attempting to reach a compromise with college to organise a smaller college event in the Trinity term of 2015.” 

There is some dismay amongst the students. One third year Univ student said, “This is just the latest in a long line of censorious decisions made by an overbearing college administration with limited recourse to practical concerns or student’s opinions. 

“The buildings in question weren’t used at all for last year’s ball but the college are both as risk averse and fundamentally deluded as John Locke’s man of glass.”

On the other hand, Delia Lockey, a classics student who had applied to be on the Ball committee, said, “I had applied to be Ball Secretary and, whilst I was very excited about the possibility of being on the committee, and hopeful that the problems surrounding the renovations could have been deemed surmountable, it was made clear from the beginning that the building work would pose a serious threat to the future of the ball. 

“As a result, this news is sad but utterly fair and expected; I hope that I can get involved with another, smaller college event in Trinity of 2015, perhaps. In the meantime there are lots of ball committees which are not connected to colleges, such as the Guild Ball, and I would encourage anyone whose college has had to cancel a ball to join such a committee.”

The college was unavailable for comment at the time of publication.

1st Week in Fashion

0

‘Coming Soon To a Woman Near You’

The Most Newsworthy in Fashion and Trends

Designer Boycott – Several big name designers such as Peter Som and Brian Atwood have requested that others not stay at the Dorchester Collection hotels, branches of which are around the world. Their owner, the Sultan of Brunei, has just implemented new anti-gay laws in his country (April 22).

Proenza Schouler + MAC – arguably one of the biggest new fashion houses of the past century, Proenza Schouler, and one of the biggest brands in makeup, MAC, collaborate in a new range to be released exclusively in Selfridges this week. Both the packaging and the shades are mean to represent the aesthetic and concept of the brand’s ‘modern woman’.

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG%%9484%%[/mm-hide-text]

Bringing Up Baby – no other Royal visit to Australasia would kick up nearly as much fuss as that of the debut state tip of Prince George. Everything from his backpack to his outfits have been scrutinized, perhaps even more so than that of his iconic mother, Kate. Subjecting models to criticism is one thing – but does Prince George really need this for the rest of his life?

The Three Blondes –looking for proof that no two women need have the same style? Look no further than the super-stylish red carpet looks of Kate Upton, Cameron Diaz and Leslie Mann at the premieres of their new film The Other Woman, which have been occurring around the world. Have a sneak peak below:

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%9485%%[/mm-hide-text] 

High Class Robbery – Following the London robbery of a Chanel store a few days ago, Dior’s flagship Paris store has also been robbed, with almost €100,000 worth of designer goods stolen. The Céline boutique was quickly hit after, with €70,000 worth of goods taken after staff were threatened with guns. The police have yet to release a public statement. 

 

Oxford Union Standing Committee member resigns

0

Katherine Connolly, a member of the Oxford Union Standing Committee, has resigned from the society, because of what she described as an “untenable” work environment.

In a statement to Cherwell, she commented, “I really care about the Union, and I don’t think anyone could accuse me of not ‘wanting enough’ to be involved. That said, the behaviour of some members of this society has been so completely intolerable that I cannot continue to represent this society as I’d want to.

“This is not a problem inherent to the society – it is a select group of people creating a work environment that I found untenable. I know Dom will do a great job, and I hope that the behaviour of a few will not put people off getting involved.”

She tendered her resignation at a Consultative Committe meeting on Monday afternoon. She will be replaced by Dominic Merchant of New College.

Ben Sullivan, President of the Oxford Union, told Cherwell, “The Union appreciates all of Ms Connolly’s hard work, and the committee and staff are very sorry to hear of her decision to step down. The Society strives to create a positive working environment for all of those involved in its running. I look forward to working with Dom and I am sure he will do an excellent job.”

Former Student runs Marathon to raise money for depression

0

Judith Robinson, a former Oxford student who has overcome depression, ran the London marathon to raise awareness of mental health issues on campus and support the Students Against Depression website.

As a student reading for a Math degree at Balliol, Judith said: “ I felt like I was sad all the time, I felt like I was letting my friends down when I didn’t feel capable of going out.”

The Students Against Depression website, which provides an online community for those in higher education affected by depression, has put Judith on the road to recovery. As she notes, “it’s brilliant. It contains the most cohesive and coherent explanations and discussions about depression that I’ve seen anywhere.”

Consequently, Judith ran the Marathon to support other students experiencing her condition and raise money for the website that has helped her overcome depression.

Judith’s marathon run was met with unanimous acclaim from Oxford students and members of the University’s administration. An Oxford University spokesman told Cherwell: “we congratulate Judith on completing her run and the way she is supporting others who are struggling with depression.”

A former Welfare Officer at St Cross concurred, stating, “Judith receives our upmost commendation for supporting such a noteworthy cause and serving as a role model for students in similarly difficult circumstances that she once was at Oxford.”

Likewise, an OUSU representative said, “I am proud of Judith for championing her cause and raising awareness for mental health issues on campus.”

Oxford University provides a wide range of support for students battling depression, including college, university, Student Union, and NHS primary care services. As an Oxford University spokesman explained: “we care deeply about the welfare of our students and these systems of support, at both college and University level, are some of the most comprehensive of any university.”

He went on, “students with diagnosed and enduring mental illnesses can access study support from a team of specialist mentors – all of whom are qualified psychologists, psychotherapists, or counsellors – through the Disability Advisory Service. If students prefer to talk to someone outside the University they can find information on local services through the Oxford Student Mental Health Network.”

Despite the presence of a comprehensive support system, however, depression and its associated factors continues to remain statistically significant. A comprehensive study on suicide rates at Oxford conducted by Hawton et al. has shown that, between 1976 and 1990, 21 Oxford students took their lives and there were a further 254 attempted suicides.

A graduate student from St Cross commented, “Though there is a degree of social acceptance to discuss depression at Oxford, most of the immediate networks are peer-centred, with little professional experience to deal adequately with the issue. Moreover, these networks are predominantly undergraduate-focused and even university-wide awareness campaigns, such as OUSU’s Mind Your Head, have not effectively tapped into the graduate space.”

He went on: “as a result, I greatly support Judith’s efforts to underscore the seriousness of depression on campus and bring the matter to a wider audience.”

Preview: History Boys

0

If you’re not familiar with Alan Bennett’s The History Boys, then you really should rectify that. A brilliant way of doing so would be to go and see what promises to be a magnificent performance of this modern classic at the Oxford Playhouse next week.

I was informed that the director (James Lorenz) was keen to replicate the open discussion of the original run’s rehearsals at which Bennett himself was present, something which was immediately noticeable during the time I spent with the cast. There is an amazing rapport amongst this group of “boys”, who in the breaks during the rehearsal maintain an uncanny likeness to their characters, throwing things, balancing scripts on their heads, and constantly cracking jokes. A combination of the fantastic cast that has been assembled and this open forum for ideas made for a delightful three quarters of an hour in their company. This was demonstrated all the more during the rehearsal, with enormous enthusiasm shared by every member of the cast and the director.

The short run of scenes which I slotted in to watch (it was refreshing to see a rehearsal at work rather than an overly-prepared snippet) moved from a typical lesson with Hector (the superb and Salvador Dali-esque Benedict Morrison) to the boys testing out a fledging Irwin (Harley Viveash). Viveash’s perfect tone of voice was matched by captivating body language as he leapt, slid, and wound his way around the classroom, interacting perhaps most of all with the self-confident Dakin, played by Tommy Siman. Siman’s lingering words created the perfect frisson with Irwin, suggesting just enough of the bubbling closer relationship underneath.

It is hard not to recognise the similarities between the performances in this production and the 2006 film adaptation, but with a play like The History Boys one might ask whether a director can significantly make it their own. This has not stopped Lorenz and his cast trying, however: in particular by casting a distinct Hector who does not conform to the Richard Griffiths expectation, but who still retains his crucial stage presence and quirky mannerisms. It undeniably appears to be a conventional production, but to criticise it for this would simply be wrong; the work they have done on this play, considering the lengthy holiday break, is astonishing.

Amongst the ensemble cast, all of the actors fit into the characteristic classroom roles with ease, from the gruff and disinterested Rudge (Frazer Hembrow), through the more tender Posner (Luke Rollason) and the thoughtful Scripps (Nathan Ellis), to the attention-seeking pair of Tibbs and Lockwood (Jack Herlihy and Tom Lambert). Being, of course, also a play with musical interludes, which are seized upon with great gusto by the boys, it was somewhat peculiar to watch Scripps tinkling the ivories on a table and humming the tunes, although he does assure me that the budget will stretch to a piano on the night.

There does not seem to be a single weak link in this cast, and whatever they are doing, it is most definitely working. Now as I say, go and see it you foul, festering, grubby-minded little trollops.

The changing nature of war correspondence

0

On the 5th of April, Anja Niedringhaus, a German photographer and Associated Press journalist was shot dead by an Afghan police officer, leaving her colleague, Kathy Gannon, seriously injured.The attack was the third of its kind on journalists in Afghanistan in less than a month, following the shooting of Swedish journalist Nils Horner and Afghan journalist Ahmed Sadar in March, whose wife and children were shot alongside him.

In the last few days the death of Niedringhaus has been closely reported and commented on by the international media, which has emphasised its sadness at the loss of a truly exceptional journalist, who was the recipient of both a Pulitzer Prize for her photography of the war in Iraq and a Courage in Journalism Award. Former colleagues have described Niedringhaus as immensely kind and courageous and amongst the best and most dedicated photojournalists of her generation — her death is rightly mourned and her bravery rightly celebrated.

There have been similar responses to the deaths of Horner and Sadar, as well as the 2012 deaths of the internationally acclaimed Sunday Times correspondent Marie Colvin and the French photographer Remi Ochlik and many in between. These men and women all risked their lives to give unheard people a voice and bear witness to atrocities. They did this so that the people their work reaches cannot claim they did not know, cannot forfeit responsibility through ignorance. The media and public’s reaction to their work and deaths has been entirely deserved. It also highlights a significant double standard.

In 2008, Amanda Lindhout moved to Mogadishu, Somalia to work as a freelance journalist. Along with photographer and fellow freelancer Nigel Brennan, Lindhout was kidnapped by Somali extremists and held for ransom for fifteen months, enduring starvation, torture and (in Lindhout’s case) extended sexual assault. However, the media’s reaction to the situation was remarkably different to the one that is being expressed this week or, indeed, to the detainment of a team of veteran New York Times reporters in 2011 and the abuse they suffered at the hands of the Libyan military. Much of the response to Lindhout’s kidnapping focused on her and Brennan’s status as freelancers, and the lack of support and expertise that this would have provided them with. This has descended into the accusation that they were naive and reckless; sensationalists seeking to make their names by capitalising on the devastation in Somalia with little or no regard for their own safety or the costs to the governments trying to negotiate their release. An article published by the Globe and Mail in September declared Lindhout as “narcissistic” and stated that her situation has “little to do with journalism”, claiming that her ultimate aim was “fame and fortune”. The same article also draws a correlation between the media attention following Lindhout’s release and the fact that she is “highly photogenic”.

If it is true that Lindhout’s actions were fuelled solely by a sensationalist desire to make a name for herself, then such harsh comments may seem somewhat justified. But there is evidence that her decision to enter notoriously dangerous Mogadishu as a freelancer and without the backing of a media outlet was not merely the action of a fame-seeking amateur, nor that it was unusual. 80% of the journalists covering Syria in 2012-2013 were freelancers and, as such, frequently operated without insurance, translators or suitable safety equipment.

Information is a commodity and, as with all commodities, the market in which it is exchanged is dictated by supply and demand. Since the Bosnia war in the 1990s, the traditional assumption that journalists are off-limits as targets of conflict has faded, increasing the danger and cost associated with reporting from war-zones. This, combined with the ease with which readers can get international news online, has led to a dramatic decrease in the number of full-time war correspondents, such as Anja Niedringhaus and Marie Colvin, that media outlets are prepared to fund.

Despite this, demand for insight into conflict zones from a personal, front-line perspective remains high and editors remain willing to pay for it. Because of the unsanctioned and open-ended nature of freelance work, competition for stories is fierce and editors can pay reporters lower and lower wages, excluding the possibility of said reporters aff ording security or insurance. This means that, regardless of whether their motives are for personal reward or a genuine desire to alleviate suff ering by raising awareness, reporters are pushed into increasingly dangerous situations, to go where others won’t, to repeat the risks taken by Amanda Lindhout in Mogadishu or hundreds of freelancers in Syria.

The media this week mourns the loss of longstanding journalists such as Niedringhaus and remembers the achievements of their work. For years, the ability of dedicated journalists to give personal insight into far-removed events and places has shaped our perspectives on upheaval and conflict and reiterated the importance of widespread suffering. All reporting from areas of conflict will involve some risk. The same media culture that celebrates the achievements these risks can bring and the sacrifices made should be less quick to condemn the new generation of reporters that they are now creating for the same ends.

Interview: Alastair Campbell

0

When I spoke to Alastair Campbell in November, he confessed that, “I hated Cambridge. I was too young, too chippy and I hated all the posh kids. I’ve always hated private schools and I still do.” As an undergraduate then, Alastair Campbell admits he was certainly never expecting to come back as a Visiting Professor, where he gave the lecture at which I met him. In fact, for a man who has been brutally honest in describing his struggles with depression, and has a public perception of being angry, dour, and combative, he can become extremely jovial and disarming. 

“I don’t give a damn what people think or say about me,” he tells me. Following this, he addresses the claim that Peter Capaldi’s foul mouthed spin doctor from The Thick of It is based on him.

“I’m actually often asked whether Malcolm Tucker is based on me and I think, what? A sweary Scottish spin doctor trying to maintain strategic cohesion among ministers, and set the government agenda across the media? Fuck yeah!”

He has previously grudgingly accepting the label of “alpha male”, which colleagues in the media labelled him and at one point during our interview, this side comes out. A member of the audience suddenly interrupts us:

“It’s a bit of a pitch. I’m not buying your book but…” 

“Well fuck off then!” Campbell replies, “You’ve just lost your pitch!” to the laughter of the onlookers, as the man sheepishly slinks away, before Campbell tells me, “Can’t he see I’m training the next generation of journalists here!”

The conversation turns to slightly more serious matters. Asked to elaborate further on his views on Oxbridge, he explains. “Clearly it is good for Britain that Oxbridge is a byword for educational excellence around the world. But I have long felt that, although in some ways it is the best of Britain, in other ways it is the worst — elitist and part of the reason Britain has never really been a proper meritocracy. Access is still a huge problem and it has barely changed since I was here. I think schools try harder than the Universities do.”

Other than meritocracy, he is also a passionate advocate for mental health causes, recently speaking at the Oxford Union in association with Mind Your Head. He tells me that, in order for the stigma against those with mental health to end, “more public figures need to be open about these things. The benefits of doing this are huge. Attitudes won’t change if we don’t talk about them. Budgets get cut, nobody complains; people suffer in silence. If you had cancer, you’d tell your boss. Why wouldn’t you tell him if you suffered depression or schizophrenia?” 

Our discussion moves into journalism, which was once his trade as former political editor of The Daily Mirror. I ask him what advice he has for a young person thinking of pursuing journalism.

“DO IT, and do it well. There are several things to remember. You must never overestimate the intelligence of people above you. Best thing about being a journalist is that everyone you meet has got a story to tell. Just don’t expect to be making any money out of it.” Encouragingly for Cherwell hacks, he praises student journalism. “I think anyone thinking of getting involved in journalism should start at University. Not just at University — I think sometimes student journalism can make a real difference in national politics!”

On the slightly more high-profile debates on the role of journalism, namely the Snowden and Wikileaks revelations, which were one of the subjects of his lecture series, he has cautious praise for The Guardian. “I actually have a lot of respect for The Guardian and how they handled Snowden.” However, he makes the point of disagreeing with Assange’s political philosophy. “He just thinks all secrets should be open, an indiscriminate dumping; I just think that’s wrong.”

He is still also a passionate defender of the controversial period of New Labour of which he was a part. Iraq, he says, “will be remembered as one of New Labour’s successes. The debate about it now is totally one sided. ‘We went to war in Iraq ten years ago and everything that’s gone wrong in the Middle East now is because of that!’ It’s totally untrue.” Other things they will be remembered for, he tells us, are the “Bank of England’s independence, devolution, as long as Scotland doesn’t go independent, Kosovo, African intervention, and crucially increasing public spending in schools and hospitals. I still like Tony Blair a lot… I chatted to him this morning in fact!”

He ends on an upbeat note. “I’ve no regrets about anything. I’ve always claimed to never care what people say about me and I never will.”

Preview: Dan and Jon vs. The Funsultancy

0

Watch the trailer here

It’s a shame that so many student made films fall under the radar, often failing to get the recognition they so thoroughly deserve. While short films won’t necessarily have the budget, big-names and technical prowess of their blockbuster counterparts, websites like Vimeo and projects like Virgin Media Shorts continue to demonstrate how the most original, heart-felt and challenging cinema is being built by amateur directors.

It’s exciting, then, that Oxford’s very own Ultimate Picture Palace are showing support for the latest crop of film-making talent by screening the brilliant 40 minute movie Dan and Jon vs. The Funsultancy. I was shown the film by its writer and director Jess Park, who admitted that, tonally, it’s a hard piece to pin down. The psychedelic narrative follows idealistic music hipster Jon who loses his job as a social events co-ordinator at work because his boss outsources the role to a ‘Funsultancy’. Faced with an inability to share his love of Aldous Huxley and J Dilla, Jon neurotically retreats into his own drug-fuelled head while coming into conflict with the expressionless, robotic funsultant.

Park told me how the film’s premise derived from his second year misadventures applying for student internships, and the script is clearly conceived as a wry glance at the world of career recruitment. Much of the film’s wit points to the ludicrousness of profit-maximising corporations who vehemently seek to market themselves as trendy, forward-thinking workplaces – most hilariously manifested in the character of Steve whose obsession with ‘creative problem solving’, ‘networking’, ‘pie-charts’ and ‘infographics’ proves incomprehensible to the ears of dopey Jon.  

Yet Park seemed keen to emphasise that the film isn’t a veiled political statement. While the narrative has satirical edges, the charm of the story lies in its wizard execution which recalls the work of film-makers like Charlie Kauffman and Edgar Wright. The manically fast editing and the endlessly creative sound design stands in energising contrast with the dead-pan, understated performances, and Jon seems unwillingly trapped inside an absurdist Kafka experiment. The film had the same ironic touch which can be seen in Richard Ayoade’s latest release The Double, except imagine that The Double meets Adventure Time and that might give you a better sense of the whimsical tone which underpins the work.

It’s also wonderful to see Oxford on screen, with location shooting happening across places like Jericho and Gloucester Green. The film’s stand out scene features Port Meadow as a mental landscape representing Jon’s musical euphoria amidst a wickedly funny stand-off between Jon and the Funsultant behind the DJ decks. Admittedly, the film demands more than a pinch of salt, and those expecting a straight drama-narrative will find themselves contending with an overwhelming sensory assault –  but if you’re willing to get on board, then Dan and John vs. The Funsultancy is a deeply satisfying, even uplifting, viewing experience.

The film was made over six weekends in Trinity term last year and has been in the editing room since then, as Park played with the sound design and cuts to find what worked best. Although it’s been a long process, the end result is impressive, hilarious and heart-felt. It’s absolutely right that the film is given a cinematic screening, demonstrating how student film-making at Oxford is a thriving enterprise well worth supporting.

‘Dan and Jon vs. The Funsultancy’ is being screened at The Ultimate Picture Palace on Cowley Road on Friday 2nd May (1st Week) at 5PM.

Event: https://www.facebook.com/events/673466379356090/?ref_notif_type=like&source=1
Tickets (£3): http://www.wegottickets.com/event/268080

 

Interview: Joey Barton

0

Joey Barton’s reputation invariably precedes him, a reputation Barton himself summarised as a “violent Neanderthal thug who roamed city centres looking to beat people up” given his portrayal in the media. Barton was jailed for six months for common assault and affray in May 2008 as well as receiving a four-month suspended jail sentence for assaulting a Manchester City team-mate in May 2007.

However the Joey Barton I met was calm, collected, intelligent and extremely friendly. At points I could see elements of the illusory Joey Barton the media had created, yet overall my meeting with Barton was characterised by his insightful self-analysis and reflection.

Barton was born September 1982 in Huyton, Merseyside in an extremely deprived community. He referred to himself as a “working class boy from the streets of Liverpool”. Reflecting on his upbringing, however, Barton pointed out some of the advantages which might not otherwise have been apparent. “I look back now and actually think it [my background] was an advantage. It made me hungry, it made me determined to make something of myself, determined to be someone in the world and gave me that drive to succeed and be successful…I would consider it a great blessing”.

It was this sort of drive that led Barton to dismiss coaches who told him he was too small and he eventually earned a professional contract with Manchester City after his boyhood team – Everton – had released him. Barton would go on to play over 150 times for Manchester City before being bought by Newcastle for £5.8 million for whom he played 84 games. He moved to Queen’s Park Rangers in 2011 where he remains after a year on loan in Marseille. He also earned a single England cap in 2007 in a friendly against Spain.

The first contract that Barton signed when aged 19 saw him receive a salary of around £6,000 a week, not including bonuses for appearances and performance. This suddenly entered Barton into a different world from the one he had grown up in, a world full of its own challenges.

“It’s scary, you have nothing and then all of a sudden you have quite a bit. It’s difficult and no one is teaching you how to adjust to it… I struggled with it, I struggled with being famous, I struggled with having money and became a shadow of the person I am now…it eventually hit the wall and it accumulated in me going to jail. I didn’t realise until I went inside how fortunate I was and how negative a person upon society I had become. It’s not easy living your life in the public eye and there’s a side of me that envies people who don’t”.

The pressures of fame, money and professional football were clearly a difficult environment to grow up in and indeed this may have been exaggerated by Barton’s persistent belief that, “by the time I was nineteen I had achieved my goal [of becoming a professional footballer]”. Perhaps this confidence in his achievements prevented him from keeping grounded. But it’s difficult to pass judgment when his background is taken into consideration. According to Barton prospects were severely limited. “I probably had three career choices; sportsman of some sort, manual labour or drug dealer”.

Joey Barton is well known for his use of social media. He has his own website where he writes pieces on all manner of subjects from football to social commentary and has nearly 2.5 million twitter followers (around four times the number that David Cameron has). The development of social media and in particular platforms such as twitter that allow celebrities and media personalities immediate contact with people is something that Barton feels is a significant development.

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%9477%%[/mm-hide-text]

Illustration by Sage Goodwin

“They [the media] have to adapt accordingly because I have so many people who follow me [on twitter] who have a better opinion of me than what the media portrayed before. They now have to adjust accordingly because it’s now not a true reflection of society to say I’m just a bad boy Neanderthal. In the social media space, why I’ve been successful is because I’m honest, I’m me, I’m genuine and people have seen that. People have seen a side of my character that they’ve never seen because the media controlled information before whereas now information is everywhere; people consume a lot of their news and a lot of their information from the internet or from social media and don’t do it from newspapers.”

Barton makes a thought-provoking point about the use of platforms such as twitter to “negate the media”, in his own words. Although Barton did jokingly acknowledge that initially he thought that giving him twitter was like “giving an arsonist a box of matches”.

Social media helps create accountability for the mainstream media because of the instant connection that people have with other sources of information. This of course was not the case prior to the advent of the internet and is even more so since the dawn of the ‘twitter age’.

Indeed Barton emphasised the positive role that social media can play and cited his use of his twitter presence in helping the campaign for justice for the victims of the 1989 Hillsborough disaster gain the 100,000 signatures for the issue to be heard in the Houses of Parliament. When the victim’s names were read out in the Houses of Parliament Barton said “along with the birth of my child it is the proudest moment of my life”.

Barton has also been outspoken about the issue of homophobia in football partially because of a personal connection – Barton had a gay uncle who he grew up “idolising and adoring”. On the issue of homophobia in football Barton spoke about the issues that still remain. “In the dressing room I don’t think it [homophobia] would be a problem, most of the lads who play football are quite liberal – it wouldn’t even be an issue. I think that the greatest fear [for gay footballers] would be what goes on inside football stadiums because we all know football fans can be quite cruel…something has to give, it will be the same way as racism within the stadium – it will be other fans policing other fans. In an ideal world we’d answer all of those questions [on homophobia in football] positively but I’m also a realist and know that there’s still a bit of work to be done. I don’t think it’s the work of gay people to do; I think it’s the work of everyone to do, society to do. Our sport, as the biggest sport in the UK, should be the most progressive.”

Barton’s progressive (and particularly outspoken) attitude on homophobia in football is refreshing if only because so few other players are willing to talk about the subject. Justin Fashanu committed suicide in 1998 eight years after becoming the first (and to this day only) professional footballer in England to come out as gay. When his niece, Amal Fashanu made a documentary for the BBC on homophobia in football in 2012 Barton was the only footballer who agreed to be interviewed. 

Joey is certainly someone who is looking to further himself. He has enrolled in a philosophy degree at Roehampton University; he undoubtedly seems to be taking it seriously because one of the two people accompanying him was one of his lecturers in philosophy from Roehampton. Indeed Barton remarked “I love causing chaos, not physical anymore, but intellectual.” He was philosophical at times and he related his chosen academic discipline to his own life, telling me “We’re doing Plato’s Republic now and really studying it in detail. A just man appearing unjust or an unjust man appearing just – what is it better to be?” This statement is particularly apt for Barton’s use of twitter to overturn the image created of him by the mainstream media.

Barton described himself as “a good man who made bad decisions” and after meeting him I would say that this rings true. Barton has done some terrible things in the past, but many would argue that they are not unforgiveable. Barton himself summed it up when he told me that, “I would dare any of us to judge anyone until we’re faced with their same situation.”