Wednesday 4th March 2026
Blog Page 1952

Trippy Tabs

0

Two Hungarian drug-smugglers received prison sentences last week after attempting to use bookshelves headed for the Cambridge University Library to smuggle amphetamines into the country.

The illegal cargo never made it to the ‘Other Place’ as the pair were stopped by the UK Border Agency while trying to enter Britain at Ramsgate in September 2009. Police found £1.3 million worth of speed hidden inside a set of roller-shelves when they searched the lorry.

Although the University has been quick to emphasise that the drugs did not make it as far as the library, some students have expressed disappointment at the interception of what could have been a welcome distraction during a day’s work.

Sandor Szabo, 45, and Csaba Hollo, 36, each now face six years in prison.

Student mugged on St Michael’s

0

 

An Oxford student was threatened by a man with a hammer in the town centre in the early hours of Friday morning.

 

The Brasenose finalist, who wished to remain anonymous, was intimidated by a man with a hammer and forced to hand over a phone before the man ran away.

 

The attack took place at 2am just outside the Oxford Union, a short distance away from the relatively busy Cornmarket Street.

 

The female student was alone and had been speaking on the phone when the man approached and demanded it was handed over.

 

He then ran away when a passer-by appeared on the scene.

 

The student declined to comment but stressed that the incident had taken place on a short route which would not normally be considered dangerous.

 

She had been walking back to Frewin Hall on New Inn Hall Street, an accommodation annex used by Brasenose College, and had followed a simple route along the High Street and Cornmarket, before turning onto St Michael’s Street.

 

The subsequent encounter on St Michael’s was described as unexpected and unpleasant.

 

The student emphasised that similar incidents can be avoided as long as students be aware of the risks of walking by themselves late at night. It is suggested that adequate safety measures were taken.

 

Francesca Golding, a second year Engineer at Brasenose, said, ‘”Oxford’s a big city so it’s to be expected that there will be crimes. 

 

“As students I think we often assume it’s going to be safe and this just goes to show that we should take more care. Also it’s probably worth noting that even though St Michael’s Street is in the centre of town, at night there aren’t that many people going down there so it can be quite intimidating.”

 

The incident has been reported to police and college authorities. The student involved said the police investigation was looking optimistic. 

 

Town calls for sports access

0

 

Oxford City Council is asking Oxford and Oxford Brookes Universities to increase local residents’ access to their sporting facilities.

An Independent Working Class Association motion asking the universities to explore ways of increasing community access was carried at an Oxford City Council meeting on 24th January.

The motion stated, “The current economic crisis is likely to have an adverse impact on the availability of affordable sports, recreational and educational facilities to Oxford residents – especially those from working class backgrounds.”

“A lot of our children will never get to go to these universities,” said Stuart Craft, the Independent Working Class Association councillor for Northfield Brook.

“A mark of an institution’s commitment to social justice isn’t sending a few students to do a bit of charity work; it’s opening up their resources to locals.

 “What’s more, students don’t pay council tax fees – we do.”

Jim Campbell, the Liberal Democrat councillor for St. Margaret’s, seconded Craft’s motion. 

He stated, “In these hard times, we wanted to encourage the authorities at both the university and the college level to extend the access they already offer.  

“I think it’s important to remember that there are a number of organisations, such as KEEN (Kids Enjoy Exercise Now), doing brilliant work for Oxford residents.”

KEEN is a charity run by Oxford and Brookes students along with other young people which provides sporting and recreational activities for children and young adults with special needs in Oxfordshire.

Many of the universities’ facilities, such as Oxford’s swimming pool and gym at Iffley Road, are already fully available for community use.

“The University maintains an excellent relationship with the local school sports coordinator, with whom we host many community sports events for children throughout the year,” said a spokesperson for Oxford University. 

 

According to a statement issued by the University, local students and residents should benefit from the planned redevelopment and expansion of the Iffley Road stadium and sports centre. Some University sports clubs may even become open for community members to join.

Oxford Brookes allows Oxford community members to join their gym and use their sports facilities, but charges locals higher fees than students.

Craft and the city councillors also hope that facilities such as boathouses, which are owned by individual colleges, could be made available to the public.

Jake Lancaster, who rows for Keble, disagrees. “The boats fall into disrepair often enough with just students using them,” he said.

“If sports teams and clubs would like to hire college facilities when students and members are not using them, they should contact the college sports clubs directly and some arrangement may well be possible,” an Oxford University spokesperson, told the Oxford Mail.

£940m in cuts

0

Finalised figures for national cuts to universities nationwide of £940m, including a 66% cut in the science capital budget, have been released. 

The figures, published by the Higher Education Funding Council for England, form part of what Universities Minister David Willetts has described as “a year of transition.”

The final budget shows that in 2011-12 universities will face a 9.5% cut compared with the current academic year, including a 6% cut to teaching budgets. Capital spending for buildings and equipment will fall by 55%, and the teaching budget will be cut by £830m the following year.

Willetts commented, “Under the new higher education reforms we are putting funding in the hands of students, instead of a centrally allocated grant.”

The University has stressed that its response will not be formed until the allocation is received in March.

A spokesperson said, “While HEFCE has announced funding levels for the sector as a whole, the institution-specific funding arrangements have not been made available yet. 

“Until those details become available we cannot speculate how the University will be affected. Whatever the updated arrangements, Oxford is committed to funding undergraduate teaching.” 

Law student Kat Shields commented, “These cuts to higher education will make it more difficult for the next generation of Britons to compete globally, particularly in areas like science.” 

Kevin Feeney, a member of the Oxford University Labour Club, told Cherwell, “This is a reckless and unnecessary proposal. The pretence of protecting the sciences while cutting funding to essential buildings and equipment is another example of the deceit of students.” 

Meanwhile, Henry Evans, President of the Oxford University Conservative Association, said, “This is just a transition period from one form of funding to another. It may be difficult at first, but ultimately these decisions will improve the system of higher education in this country.” 

Nationally, many universities have voiced fears over the future of research. Russell Group director general, Wendy Piatt, said, “These new cuts will make it even harder for our top universities and researchers to lead the economic recovery.” 

While a spokesperson for the Department of Business, Skills and Innovation has said that the changes will provide “stability and certainty,” Labour’s universities spokesman, Gareth Thomas, called the cuts “unfair, unnecessary and unsustainable.”  

No more gossip

0

A controversial gossip website used by students at universities and schools has closed down.

LittleGossip had a whole section dedicated to Oxford University, allowing anonymous users to spread rumours about people’s looks, sex lives and drug habits.

Exeter College had one of the most active message boards, with personal posts being written about several of its members.

One student was described as a “really lovely girl. Fucks with people’s heads though” while another was branded the “biggest virgin”.

Though not everyone was joining in, another member of the group posted the following, which got thirty-four likes before the website ceased operation:

“Hurt people hurt and it’s clear that people posting shite here have taken a punch to their fragile and insecure emotions. 

“Remember you’re the only version of you that will ever exist, don’t let the jealous and obsessed get you down.”

Another anonymous user on the Exeter College message board said of Adolf Hitler, the military and political leader who launched World War Two and bears responsibility for the deaths of millions, “Bit of a dick to be honest.”

LittleGossip, created by web developers in Belize, had been pressurised by schools to hide its most offensive content. Several leading private schools, including Tormead School in Guildford and James Allen Girls in London, were forced to ban the website back in December.

John Carr, member of the executive board of the UK Council for Internet Safety, told the BBC that though the site’s content was “very distressing”, there was nothing illegal about the site in general and thus they could not take legal action to close it down. “It’s essentially about the abuse of anonymity and allowing people to hide behind cloaks to say horrible things about people,” he commented. 

In a statement on their homepage, Little Gossip blamed a “minority of irresponsible people” for continuing to abuse the site.

Jesus sun still shining

0

Jesus College JCR has voted to spend £800 on a sunbed this week, in a move derided by some members of the college as “wasteful” and “decadent”.

The purchase was put forward in a last-minute JCR motion by Jesus Tanning Club and approved at the general meeting last Sunday. The JCR Committee is now awaiting college approval before plans for the sunbed’s installation can go ahead. 

However, concerns over electricity usage and the likelihood of installation in a college-owned building mean the plans are in doubt. A third year student said,  “I’m not averse to a slightly tongue-in-cheek motion being put through. 

“However, if the sunbed was actually bought I would be more concerned. I always thought people look better without having the skin tone of an American football.”

Other students were similarly sceptical. Kathryn Finch, a second year, said, “I was surprised at the news. 

“My first reaction was that I’m not really up for paying for institutionalised cancer. It just sounds like a bit of a waste of money.”

The sunbed purchase comes after the “death of fun” at Jesus last term. Students wore black armbands in protest at increased academic pressure from college authorities.

Declan Clowry, a second year student at Jesus, was more optimistic. “Decadent?” He said. “Maybe. But it’s probably cheaper and greener than flying off somewhere hot.”

Oxford faces "brain drain"

 

Concerns have been raised that Oxford is loosing its competitive edge when in come to attracting quality researchers and lecturers.

Professors at Brown, an Ivy League University in the USA, are paid a base rate equivalent of £83,450, while their counterparts at Oxford  are paid only £62,621, excluding collegiate benefits.

A recently advertised post for a Tutorial Fellowship at Merton contained details of a combined University and College salary of between £42,563 and £57,201.

Annual salaries given out by the University of Cambridge for professorships are also greater than those given out by Oxford.

The minimal professorial salary for a Professor in Cambridge is £64,379.

There is, however, a degree of ambiguity when it comes to salaries in Oxford, as both the University and colleges can contribute towards the salaries of academics.

A spokesperson for the University said, “the salary range for lecturers, which is the main career grade at Oxford University, does not include college salary and benefits on top.

“Most academics draw a salary from the University plus a salary from their college, the level of which will vary between colleges.

“College membership also brings various benefits such as use of college facilities. Other benefits include responsibility allowances for the heads of departments.”

Allowances for books and entertainment are often included in academics’ salaries.

The book grant for the advertised post at Merton is worth £814 per annum alone, and the tax-free entertainment allowance on top of that is worth £450.

There is also a remarkable difference in the amount paid to the heads of institutions.  Oxford’s Vice Chancellor, Andrew Hamilton, is paid £382,000 per year, but his counterpart at Stanford in the USA is paid $702,000 in 2008, the equivalent of £435,500.

At Brown, the starting rate for a lecturer is the equivalent of £37,314, whereas in Oxford, faculty lecturers can be paid as little as £21,367.

Last term, several academics voiced their concern that Oxford was becoming a victim of the ‘brain drain’ as academics fled to other universities worldwide.

Brian Foster, Professor of Experimental Physics, noted that Oxford could suffer an exodus of academics as better funding became available elsewhere.

Despite the recent passing of legislation allowing universities to charge up to £9,000 a year, this is still a fraction of what students pay in the USA.

At Brown, the 2010-11 academic fee was £24,776 excluding accommodation and other costs.

 

The Color (or Colour) of Spellcheck

0

 

                One of the most basic differences between American English and British English spelling is the ‘u’ included in words like colour, honour, and valour in the latter, and the lack thereof in the former. It’s a simple variance and one that is both often noted and rarely noticed.

 

                Until, that is, you’re a speaker of the American tongue who forgets to change the settings on their computer to the proper language when writing an essay for your tutorial. You usually remember to do this; that way, you can rely on spellcheck to catch all the words you’d never even think to change. When that happens, all hell can break loose. You’ll head to your tutor’s office, read out your essay, get through an hour’s discussion, and hand in the sheaf of paper on your way out the door. Perfectly normal, right?

 

                Well, yes. But then, as you walk back towards your own college, you’ll suddenly realize that you left the wrong language settings intact because you’d been filling out an internship application and used the American spellings for that document. Maybe your tutor won’t notice, you think, and even if he does, it can’t be that much of an issue, can it?

 

                If that’s the kind of thought process that would be running through your head, then you’re a lot like I used to be – up until such an occurrence befell me in the middle of my first year. The following week, when I received my essay, my tutor had very carefully underlined each and every instance of misspelling involving such a “u” and then written, in bold, at the end of my essay, that such words as I had used did not exist in the English language on this side of the pond.

 

                So I was careful not to do this again; until a week or two ago, that is. I haven’t gotten the essay back yet, but I’m prepared for what might happen. It’s rather like coloring (or colouring) outside the lines when you make such a mistake, and I prefer to believe it makes me an original.

 

 

Who needs to import when you can buy homegrown

0

With the last week’s extraordinary events both on and off the pitch, many would be hard pushed to look beyond the financial muscle, attraction and phenomenon of the Barclays Premier League for entertainment, controversy and eye-catching football. But if they were to have a cursory glance at the top half of the Npower Football League One table, then they’d find a phenomenon of a different kind and an encouraging one at that: the emergence of a group of ambitious, albeit inexperienced, English managers. As it stands, half of the top ten clubs in the league are managed by English managers and what links Chris Powell at Charlton Athletic, Keith Hill at Rochdale, Lee Clark at Huddersfield Town, Lee Bradbury at Bournemouth and Karl Robinson at Milton Keynes Dons are five factors: a shared nationality, enthusiasm, a playing career of some description, youth and, most notably, all are in their first managerial stints.

For years now, the media and press in this country have been bemoaning a distinct lack of talented English managers let alone players, most notably in the Barclays Premier League. While many only seem to care about what is happening in what is perceived to be the best league in the world, the lack of recognition for bright young English managers in the lower leagues is quite frankly disrespectful. The reality is that young talent, be it managerial or personnel, is there. You only need to take one look at the recent January Transfer Window and, in particular, the frenzy surrounding the highly rated Southampton winger, Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain, as an example of top-flight clubs fighting it out amongst each other to secure the best and brightest talent in England. Thankfully, for the Npower Football League One club’s sake, Chamberlain remains a Saint, at least for now. But whilst young English talent is a matter for another week, young English managers have, in recent years, been causing somewhat of a stir. Burnley’s new manager, Eddie Howe and Paul Ince, now of Notts County, are just one example of this.

Forced into an early retirement by a persistent knee injury, Howe, an ex-defender at Bouremouth, at the age of 31, having spent a few years coaching Bournemouth’s reserve team including a brief spell as caretaker manager, was hired as the club’s youngest ever permanent manager. Since then he hasn’t looked back. Within the space of a year he remarkably guided the Cherries to promotion, to Npower Football League One, this despite the club having a transfer embargo placed on it, and was recently named the Clarets new manager. Howe does he do it? For Ince the story was somewhat different. Having enjoyed a successful spell at Milton Keynes Dons, guiding them to the Johnstone’s Paint Trophy and achieving promotion back to Npower Football League One in the space of year, the lure of the Barclays Premier League was one which he could simply not turn down. His brief spell at Blackburn Rovers, just 17 games at that, was a huge disappointment but a learning curve in itself.
Significantly, Ince became the first black British manager in England’s top flight division and his experience did not put him off management. Indeed he returned back to his old stomping ground within the space of eight months. While Ince may have eclipsed Howe at this moment in time by taking up the mantle in the Barclays Premier League, it is a step which the former is certainly very much capable of taking.

Nonetheless, both cases highlight two important factors: firstly, the lower league is a more than apt environment for managers to learn their trade and secondly, top-flight clubs are, albeit in all honesty only a minority, willing to take a gamble on lower league managers with years or, crucially, although very rarely, months of managerial experience. I say top-flight clubs but most recently the ex-Sheffield United manager Gary Speed even surpassed that by somewhat surprisingly being named Wales’s new national manager, last September. While Speed’s case in particular certainly raised some eyebrows, it points to a wider question of just how important ‘managerial experience’ is when it comes to appointing a manager. Certainly what links the likes of Speed, Ince and the five English managers in question in Npower Football League One is playing experience of some sort. This can be attributed more so to Speed, Ince, Powell and Clark who themselves have represented their countries at international level, be it at under-21 level in Clark’s case. Thus, although the requirements demanded are of a different kind and the transition from player to manager is a big one, it seems that as a general rule, some sort of playing experience is an important asset to have.

Nevertheless, what is refreshing to see, far more so in the Npower Football Leagues than in the Barclays Premier League, is that people with no previous managerial experience are being given a chance to prove their worth. I deliberately say people because even non-footballers have over the years broken into the managerial set-up. Look no further than Dr. Les Parry and Nigel Adkins – Tranmere Rovers and Scunthorpe United’s managers/physiotherapists respectively Of course one can argue that the stakes in the lower-leagues are no way near as high as they are in the Barclays Premier League and so chairmen are allowed some leeway when it comes to appointing a manager, which is itself a perfectly valid argument. Yet, the very fact that there are currently, according to the latest list published by the League Managers Association, 60 English managers out of work, underlines that chairmen do not necessarily need to take a perceived gamble on young, inexperienced managers. Out of the five inexperienced managers in question in Npower Football League One, Karl Robinson of Milton Keynes Dons is the most interesting case. His playing career was spent in the very lowest echelons of English football with the likes of Marine, Oswestry Town and Kidsgrove Athletic but he had coached at both Blackburn Rovers and Liverpool and had been assistant manager to Paul Ince during his second spell in charge of the club. Nevertheless the decision to appoint Robinson at the age of just 29 was seen as a bold step taken by Chairman Pete Winkelman. What Robinson does not possess in lower-league football experience, he more than makes up for with both his ambition and coaching credentials. Milton Keynes Dons currently find themselves just outside the play-off places, albeit only on goal difference, alongside Paul Dickov’s Oldham Athletic and Chris Powell’s Charlton Athletic in what is proving to be another exciting promotion chase in Npower Football League One. Regardless of where Milton Keynes Dons finish, for their sake hopefully in some form of promotion spot, Pete Winkelman should be applauded as a chairman who believes and, more importantly, trusts in youth – a philosophy which should be replicated at higher league levels.

Of the five managers in Npower League One, the one huge advantage they have is youth. The mean age of messers Powell (41), Hill (41), Clark (38), Bradbury (35) and Robinson (30), is 37 – mere kids in managerial years. And like kids, over time they will mature, learning through their experiences, accumulating knowledge and coming to love Hannah Montana – say what? Mind you Miley Cyrus… Anyway, such an upbringing has certainly worked to Speed, Ince and Howe’s advantage. However, the big fear for chairmen of clubs who possess these young bright managerial talents is that a higher placed club will eventually come to snatch them away from under their noses. A pattern unfortunately reciprocated with that of young lower league English talent. In some cases, like that of Paul Ince, the opportunity to work in the Barclays Premier League was one which even Pete Winkelman at Milton Keynes Dons could not begrudge him. Yet, like young English players, one should question whether a step up, particularly so early in ones career, is an absolute necessity. Surely a few seasons in the lower leagues, moulding your own team together, achieving stability and experimenting so as to find out about your own strengths and weaknesses as a manager would provide a better learning curve than being thrust into the spotlight at a ‘bigger’ club where results are effectively everything. Some quarters would perceive this as being overtly negative and a wonderful opportunity, but in some cases reputations which may have been built up over many years on the pitch, have consequently crumbled within the space of a matter of months off it – ain’t that right Keano?

It is my belief that too often in this country, especially in the Barclays Premier League, there is an all too familiar tendency for chairmen to look abroad to both fill managerial vacancies and invest in foreign talent. Yet, given the ever increasing importance of either staying or challenging for European places in the Barclays Premier League, primarily driven by monetary factors, it appears that the prospect of a young English manager given the chance to manage in the top-flight is slowly diminishing. In most cases a safe pair of hands with plenty of experience is the correct formula and it would take a brave chairman to go against this trend. Yet, ever since England’s dismal showing in last year’s World Cup, the Football Association’s focus has very much been on investing in England’s future in both managerial and personnel circles. Of course English football as a whole needs a serious looking at but the FA could do no worse than investing serious time in nurturing the young, upcoming English managers in the lower leagues. Call me jingoistic, but if English football really has its sights set on challenging for major honours then the time to start planning for the future must begin now. The former Manchester City manager, Stuart Pearce, is already an important part of the England set up, managing at under-21 level and acting as a coach for Fabio Capello’s England team whilst the former Middlesbrough manager, Gareth Southgate, was recently appointed alongside Sir Trevor Brooking as the FA’s head of elite development. Change is happening in the highest echelons of English football and now that change must continue to be instigated down into the Barclays Premier League and beyond.

There is no doubt that a wealth of managerial potential exists within the Npower Football Leagues. If this potential is channelled in the right direction, then we could, premature I know, be witnessing the birth of a future England manager. It is abundantly clear that there are people out there who are desperate to give something back to a game which, in itself, helped to mould their own careers. What the game needs are chairmen like Pete Winkelman who are willing to give these people an opportunity, to share their ambition and trust their judgement. If such an approach is taken then the English game will only be better for it. So come on, lets give youth a chance.

The Lion, the Witch and the…Closet?

0

As a six-year-old in New York, I was sophisticated enough to know what a wardrobe was when I first happened upon the term in the title of the most famous of C. S. Lewis’ Narnia books. But it surprised many of my friends in Britain to hear that such knowledge isn’t universal among American kids.


The reason for this is, of course, that in most American homes, wardrobes are the exception, not the rule. Closets in which to hang your clothes, line up your shoes, and organize any and all other manner of wearable items are de rigueur. Like wardrobes, closets vary in size – though in my own experience have been much larger, some as small as a midsized wardrobe, others as large as a very small specimen of a fresher’s room here in Oxford.


But unlike wardrobes, closets are built in to a house; you can’t take one with you when you leave a house behind. And they’re something you step into, not up into – which can make all the difference to a child. I wanted my parents to go out and buy a wardrobe for months after reading The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe – of course they didn’t, but I begged because I thought that I too could discover Narnia, if only I had the proper gateway at my disposal.


I never once considered the possibility that a closet might lead me to this land of magic in the same way. And throughout the rest of my childhood, though I spoke in the American tongue and read many books written in a decidedly British tone, I never fused the ideas of the two objects together, never quite conceptualized the notion that to have one was to replace the other, that to have both would be impractical.


Until, that is, I came to Oxford, and discovered in my room a pale wardrobe – much smaller than my closet at home. Struggling to shove all of my things into it at every possible angle, I found myself for the first time yearning for a closet instead. My dreams had come full circle – twelve years later, I was in the land that was once the home of the man who created Narnia – and I no longer wished for a wardrobe.