Oxford's oldest student newspaper

Independent since 1920

Blog Page 2045

Awkward Viewing: Brokeback Mountain with your mother

Like many veterans of the 60s, my parents pride themselves on their openness about subjects their own parents’ generation considered too taboo even to acknowledge. When it comes to candour about these matters my mother, who is not only a former hippie but French, is doubly credentialed.

So whenever she and I go to the movies, I try not to think twice if the poster features a scantily clad woman or if the review has warned of explicit sexual content, as it did when we went to see Brokeback Mountain.

After all, why should a mother and son feel any discomfort about watching a man lubricate his penis with his own saliva, right before thrusting it into Jake Gyllenhaal with all the explosive, repressed passion of a lone gay cowboy in a red state?
Under normal circumstances, that particular scene probably wouldn’t have made much of an impression on me. It’s just that, with your mother sitting right beside you, you may, even in spite of the most cosmopolitan attitudes, begin to worry that some small, irregular motion on your part will betray you as reacting to the fleshy images with anything other than detached interest.

You suppress the urge to breathe deeply, taking your air in small sips. Your oxygen debt gradually accumulates, and when you finally give in, heaving as if your life depended on it (because it does), you look up at the screen to find Heath Ledger in the middle of a groaning, pyrotechnic orgasm. As he collapses in a heap of post-coital exhaustion, your mother, having caught the escalating rise and fall of your shoulders out of the corner of her eye, asks you how you’re doing.

Shortly after you’ve started to take your mind off breathing, Ennis and Jack are scampering by the stream in their full frontal glory. At this moment, it comes to your attention that your boxer shorts are tightly bunched around your inner thighs, and you realize that you won’t be able to tolerate the discomfort for much longer.
Your hands inch slowly toward the front of your pants to loosen the offending cloth. When you finally discover that it won’t budge because you’re sitting on the slack, you attempt to manage without hands, squirming your hips restlessly in the seat – just, as it happens, as the two men’s wet, muscular frames lock in a passionate kiss.

The credits roll, and the two of you emerge quietly into the late afternoon glare. She finally ventures to break the silence. ‘God, Jake Gyllenhal is so sexy, don’t you think?

Interview: Peter James

Peter James, British film producer turned best-selling crime novelist, is distinctly charming, well-spoken and precise. And although his subject matter does revel in a sense of chilling horror – the grimy, criminal underbelly, men buried alive, brutal murders, and most recently, human organ trafficking – the way that James talks about his rather macabre subjects is engaging, rather than purely chilling or designed to shock.

James has written over 20 books, been translated into over 29 languages, and ridden high on the top of the Sunday Times bestseller list with his most recent books which feature Brighton-based Detective Superintendent Roy Grace. The books have quickly become one of the world’s most popular detective series, and this is in no small part due to the well thought-out and thoroughly researched plots. James’ latest book, ‘Dead Tomorrow’, focuses on the struggle of a mother whose daughter is suffering from liver failure, who turns to a black market broker to find the vital organ. Meanwhile, Detective Roy Grace follows the grim trail of child traffickers to Eastern Europe. The subject matter is evidently harrowing and shocking, so does James plot his books with this in mind, with topics picked for their scare factor?

‘I write about what I’m intrigued by,’ he tells me as he sits across the table, in a small bar-slash-restaurant-slash-coffee chain, as he drinks alternately from a beer and an espresso. He leans forward with a glint in his eye, ‘Do you know how much your body is worth?’ I become slightly unsure of where is this interview going. ‘On average, about a million dollars. $400k for your liver, the same for your heart and lungs, $60k for each kidney, a bit more for other bits and pieces… You’d make a lot of money, if you could live without your heart.’ I place a protective hand over my liver. Again, athough part of this speech is clearly designed for impact, it is a subject James knows a huge amount about and just wants to share. There is almost too much to take in, as he flits from anecdote to fact, and back again.

‘An English doctor was struck off for buying kidneys from Turkey. I met him and he said to me, ‘You can survive well on one kidney, and there are people dying because they can’t get one. Why would anyone have a problem with it?’ In India, the going price for a kidney is £250. For us to buy it, once it’s gone through the middle men, you are talking £25, 000. China lowers the threshold of the death penalty every year. They get a million pounds a body.’ And why is this happening now? Sadly, what has happened is that as organ transplant techniques have gotten better, the supply of donors has gone down.

‘The big irony is that the biggest cause of the decrease is more people wearing seatbelts in cars. The perfect donor is someone who has a head injury, and dies with his or her body intact. Now with modern cars being stronger, if some is killed in a crash they’re normally pretty badly mangled. But, certain countries have realised that there’s a business to be had. I used to think it was an urban legend, you know, the man who meets a pretty girl in a bar, goes back to a hotel room, and next thing he wakes up in a bathtub short of a kidney. It’s not.’

‘Do you know how much your body is worth? About a million dollars.’

James’ fascination with organ trafficking started almost seven years ago, when James met Kate Blewett, the documentary maker behind Channel Four’s harrowing ‘The Dying Rooms’, who talked to him about her new subject matter. ‘She’d heard about this organ trafficking trade. Kate sent two researchers out to Columbia. They were both murdered. She couldn’t go on with the documentary, but she said that I could have her research. It went on from there. In Columbia there will be two kids begging at an airport, cop arrests them, sells them for £50, and they get a nice upbringing in the countryside, get to the age of thirteen, fourteen and someone in the West, their daughter needs a new liver, and that kid disappears. Their liver sold, heart, lungs. It is going on.’

But, surely it couldn’t be that easy to get hold of, say, a liver? It’s not exactly the type of thing you can type into Google. ‘I actually met a couple who live in England – one of the biggest focuses of my research – and their son from about the age of eleven had progressive liver failure, and they couldn’t get him to the top of the transplant list. And they were told he’d die.

So they went on the Internet, and found a broker, who found them a liver for about £200-300,000, and they started raising the money. Luckily, a liver came through, and they were ok but…’ The ‘but’ hangs in the air, a testament to the tangle of morals around the subject. This is where the tone of our conversation changes, from fact-swapping to something much more emotionally charged. James meticulously researches his stories, and he seems to have a real engagement with the ethical dilemmas behind his plots. ‘Dead Tomorrow’ displays a real knowledge of the human suffering that forces some people to the lengths of buying and selling their own body parts. James spent a lot of time in Romania, just talking with the people who had suffered under the oppressive regime of Ceauşescu.

‘Seeing street kids was heart-breaking. It was really hard, the hardest thing was the sheer desperation, thousands of people living way below the poverty margin, literally in holes in the road, just to be by the central heating pipes. All the youngsters want to get out and their dream is to come to some western country… although I say western, it’s outrageous, Romania is western. It’s in the EU and it shouldn’t be there. It’s a third world country.
You drive one mile out of the city and you’re in slums, and then the slums give way to several hundred miles of rubbish. The first time I went I thought, ‘Hmmm, it’s snowing.’ And then I realised it was just litter.’

‘Hell will freeze over before a crime novel gets onto the Booker shortlist.’

It is clear that his interest in writing stems from wanting to draw attention to things he feels have been overlooked, or unfairly confined to the background – and this applies as much to the British police, who James joins on average every week on their daily rounds from murder scenes to rehabilitation centres, as it does to the harrowing organ trade. ‘I think they [the police] are severely underappreciated. The public have this slightly jaded view of the police; they think they’re not actually out there fighting crime, but in the course of a career, almost every police officer, almost without exception, will have his life endangered.’ And could he be a police officer? He says very simply, ‘I don’t think I’d be brave enough.’

Brave enough, however, to be a crime writer in a literary world that still sneers at the genre. When asked why this is, it seems that James can’t quite answer. ‘I get really annoyed. The chairman of the Booker prize, three years ago was asked, ‘Why is there never a crime novel on the booker shortlist?’ and he said, ‘Hell will freeze over before a crime novel gets on the book shortlist’. So, that means Dickens would never have made it; Deschosky, Shakespeare, Aristotle…so many writers have written what we would now consider to be crime fiction. My point is that people get very precious about literature.’ James made a very brave move to start writing crime – he began when horror was the genre du jour and made the leap of faith to a different publisher who supported his vision.

His final word on the matter? ‘Writers are entertainers; the writers that survive are the popular ones.’ And there is no doubt that James is and will continue to be a popular writer, although he goes beyond the merely entertaing. Advice for budding writers? ‘Is to read. Do not be afraid to say, ‘I love this book’, whether it’s Stephen King, or Rankin, or Trollope, whatever it is that you love, and think, ‘how did that writer make that book so great?” James has achieved prolific status and though he may never make it on to the Booker shortlist, or even the longlist, his crime novels are reviving and revitalising an often pigeonholed genre in a way that he hopes might remove some of the literary stigma.

 

Countdown to Kick-Off

Even before a ball has been kicked, the JCR Premier Division looks strangely different in 2009/2010 than in seasons past. Gone are Worcester, perennial challengers and recurrent champions; shockingly relegated to Division 1 along with St Anne’s and Oriel. They are replaced by LMH, Brasenose and Merton/Mansfield, all who might be capable of rising to the top of this league. LMH pose a particular threat to the established hierarchy, having breezed to promotion and scalped a handful of big teams in Cuppers.
As ever in college football, predictions at this stage will likely be decimated by 3rd week, but the pre-season favourite must be Teddy Hall- a team that swept aside its Premier Division rivals on the way to a dominant title, only to fall in the Cuppers final to a surprisingly brilliant Division II St John’s side; a result which greatly attests to the strength and quality of teams throughout all of the leagues.

The remaining bulk of Premier Division sides all have the potential to either flourish or flounder: new captains must scour the incoming fresher’s pool to find that coveted starter or two, building a new team that can stay competitive after the exodus that is Graduation.

Christ Church might be a stealthy title challenger if only they can solve the terminal inconsistency that left them fighting for survival until the final day of last season- they find themselves in the rare position of losing only 2 players from their 1st XI, and have shown flashes of excellence at times.

St Catz are a resilient, efficient side, very difficult to break down defensively, and should push onwards from an outstanding season in the upper echelons of the league. New College are again an unknown quantity: arguably the most talented group in 2008/9, they failed to build upon an impressive start and fizzled out with a string of heavy losses- expect a strong recovery year.
Magdalen enjoyed an exact reversal of that fortune in their first top flight campaign, beginning the 16-game season with 5 losses and a draw before suddenly finding form and rocketing up the table in Hilary. Wadham’s escape from the dreaded drop was remarkable, riding the crest of a strong team spirit to clamber out of the relegation zone and finish above a couple of college football powerhouses. If they can find some more quality, this team could give itself a much more comfortable season.

Further down the leagues, the aforementioned St. John’s side will be hoping to continue their form from last years, where they went unbeaten, adding the Division II title to their shock Cuppers win. After maintaining most of the team which did this for them, they expect to make their mark in Division I, but it will be hard to live up to their recent success, with teams like Worcester and St. Anne’s eager to burst their bubble.

College sport is always notoriously difficult to evaluate in the pre-season, but this group of teams, certainly in the Premier Division, should provide us with some intense rivalries and, hopefully, two terms of flowing football: when Wednesday afternoon comes, the drama of the beautiful game will return to Oxford’s pitches.

Think Pink

Described as an electro-rock duo, The Big Pink are tipped as the next big thing. Their edgy, eclectic sound is definitely worth checking out.

You’re about to commence on a lengthy tour of Europe and the US – how are you feeling?
Homesick! 

What are the best and worst moments in your tour history so far?
The worst is probably Reading – Akiko, our drummer, developed some weird disease in the tour bus on the way down. The best was Pukkelpop in Belgium – to be on the same line-up as Faith No More and My Bloody Valentine… say no more!

How about the places you’ve been? What is the worst place you’ve visited?
Norway, purely because it costs £8 a beer.

You’re about to go on tour with Muse, who have a pretty visually epic stage show. Is this something you go in for, or do you like to keep it more minimalist?
We go for a post-minimalism vibe… we do what we can.

Muse is a pretty big deal, but who else have you enjoyed touring with? Who’ve been your favourite touring partners so far?
A Grave With No Name [a London band with a pretty original sound, combining sweet guitar riffs with weird sounds to create something atmospheric and often dark] – pretty much, as they’re fucking dudes.

How did the festival season go for you? Any personal highlights?
Festival season was awesome. My personal highlight was watching someone try and stage dive the main stage and eat serious amounts of barrier.

Your name seems to cause a lot of confusion – what it has to do with The Band (if anything), or otherwise what it’s about. Can you explain?
We basically nicked it. We like it cos it’s got a (false) sense of grandeur and it’s kind of phallic.

The title of your new album ‘A brief history of love’ is quite a claim. Is it fair to say you’ve boiled it down to the bare essentials?
It’s really a brief history of our love. You can’t condense love, and there is nothing brief about it. I like that it doesn’t really make sense.

The songs on your album are impressively different from each other. Is that something you aimed for,?
I think so… We didn’t aim to do anything. We just wrote songs. We didn’t plan anything.

Who or what are the biggest influences on your music? Any surprising ones?
Probably not.  Everything that has come into my consciousness has influenced this record. Music from Otis Redding , the books of John Fante, Andy Warhol. Walls of sound. Feedback.

Who are your favourite bands at the moment?
Salem and A Grave With No Name. 

Did you always plan to become musicians? If you weren’t playing music, what would you be doing?
Me personally – I’d be doing what I was before, which is my label [Merok Records, responsible for bringing Crystal Castles to Europe, and putting out Klaxons’ second single]. Robbie would be playing guitar in a band.

In music terms, which do you think was the better decade to grow up in; the nineties or the noughties?
90s. Check Your Head. Nevermind. Definitely Maybe.

Finally, what’s the best thing about life in a rock band?
Not having time to wash my clothes.

The Big Pink play the 02 Academy on Saturday October 10th at 21:00.

Truckin’ Down Cowley Road

Described by John Peel in 1997 as ‘the very heart of Oxford’s music scene’, the Cowley Road has links with all the great bands that have come out of Oxford. The video for Radiohead’s first single (Creep) was filmed in the Zodiac (now known as the O2 Academy). Supergrass recorded their earliest single, ‘Caught by the Fuzz’, in the nearby bedroom of a friend, while two songs on their debut album (‘Strange Ones’ and ‘I’d Like to Know’) were inspired by the area.

Today it’s arguably the most cosmopolitan part of town; the one place which truly has the feel of a modern city, where the streets are not deserted past bed-time, where you can find a Polish produce shop (what English city is complete without a Polski sklep?), where the bells of Christ Church are (almost) out of earshot.
‘We’ve wanted to bring that SXSW vibe to our home town for ages – and now we have. We’re really excited about showing off just what the Cowley Road has to offer, and although it’s indoors, feel free to wear your wellies and get into that festival mood,’ says Robin Bennett, festival organiser.

And so it is that brothers Joe and Robin Bennett, the folks behind local festivals Truck and Wood, have teamed up with Oxford music promoters YouMeDancing! to honour and celebrate this most creative part of the city’s landscape.
On Saturday 10th October (the end of 0th week) OX4 will be taking residence at ten venues up, down, and just off the Cowley Road, from the Academy to G&D’s.
Anyone familiar with Truck, Wood or any of the other festivals put on by these guys will know to expect a whole assortment of events. OX4 Festival goers can confidently expect to get more than just music for their money. Expect anything and everything from music to comedy, workshops and debates.

Truck (pictured above) has come a long way in its eleven year history but remains unique and completely independent. Bands like Ash and The Lemonheads play alongside old timers like Damo Suzuki (of 70s krautrockers Can) and Garth and Maud Hudson (Garth having played organ for The Band). The main stage is still the back of a truck and the vicar still sells his homemade ice-cream.

Wood – a springtime eco-festival that’s been going only two years – is equally distinctive. Amongst its wonderful quirks are bicycle-powered discos, the biogesic pleasure domes, the make-shift loos, and, of course, the eco-friendly structures, including the entirely wooden main stage.

Less well publicised, though no less noteworthy, are the wild nights the Bennett brothers have occasionally staged at the Working Men’s Club in Wallingford, a picturesque Thames-side market town just half-an-hour’s bus ride outside Oxford.
The whole town shows up to get their faces painted and listen to live music , with a backdrop of classic movie clips – I’ve seen people go crazy over cheese auctions there.

OX4 looks set to fit right into Truck’s repertoire, with music of all different genres as well as an array of other cultural entertainment events and activities. Hammer & Tongue will be hosting a poetry slam (12.00-5.00 at G&D’s). Catweazle Club – an open mic event where anything goes – will be running in its usual location of the East Oxford Community Centre (7.00-10.00). There’ll be comedy in the form of ‘The Free Beer Show’, and creative workshops such as ‘Write a Film Script’, and ‘Design the Next Magic Numbers LP’ will be happening at various points during the day.

In the spirit of creativity and independence, OX4 is also the launch for Oxford’s first Un-Convention (a music industry event – see over the page for more details). Oxon Carts will also be on hand to rickshaw you about between the attractions.
‘Hard partying’ will bring the festival to a close. An OX4 ticket (priced at £15, or £12 if you’re under 18) gets you into Transformation at the Academy, where Trashy and Room 101 will also be happening. Alternatively, there’ll be reggae at the East Oxford Community Centre, or electro at Baby Simple.

Review: Away We Go

When self-confessed ‘fuck-ups’ Burt and Verona are confronted with Verona’s pregnancy at 34, they immediately look to Burt’s parents for support. When it becomes apparent that the child’s grandparents have little interest in the imminent birth, Burt and Verona take the logical step of touring North America whilst she is six months pregnant to look for the ideal place to raise their child.

This was when my problems with the film began, as the lack of grandparents did not seem to be a sufficiently convincing motivation for the couple to embark on a grueling road-trip. However, this is what they decide to do, travelling round the continent meeting up with old friends and family and discovering why they don’t want to raise their child in Phoenix (too red neck), Madison (too New Age) and Montreal (too depressing).

On one level Sam Mendes’ new film is a meditation on the meaning of marriage, parenthood, family and love in the modern world. On screen, this translates into scene after scene of Burt and Verona, often in tears, confessing their fears to one another whilst generic acoustic guitar music crescendos in the background. This might sound slightly heartless, but then again, I doubt the target audience for these parts of the film was twenty year old males.

Thankfully though, the rest of the film is held together by consistently funny scenes. Whereas Verona is often more obviously burdened by the travails of pregnancy, Burt is hilarious throughout, discoursing on subjects ranging from vaginal flavours to the merits of steak houses. One of the funniest scenes features Maggie Gyllenhaal as Burt’s disturbed cousin lecturing the on the evils of strollers and the beauty of the sea horse’s breeding rituals.

Away We Go has almost no heroes in it; it is full of apathetic parents, despairing wives and shell-shocked divorcees. In Phoenix, Burt meets the husband of one of Verona’s friends who, in his misery about being rejected from the golf club, drunkenly explains to Burt that ‘America is a piece of shit… I guess that makes everyone else flies on our shit.’

This unsettling examination of modern North American life balances the more saccharine parts of the film and denies the viewer a straightforwardly happy ending, leaving you instead to reflect on the enormity of the task that lies ahead of the characters.

 

Making An Entrance

Whether you are new to Oxford or not, the University drama scene can be an intimidating place. We are surrounded by a constant stream of high-quality productions, with over thirty each term and many also spilling over into the vacation. The variety of student drama is unparalleled, ranging from classics to edgy new writing. Most importantly, however, is the strong encouragement and support of independent groups, which gives Oxford a truly unique quality. For this reason you may be a little hesitant when it comes to getting started, but once you know the ropes there is a massive opportunity for first class experience in a number of areas.

OUDS

The Oxford University Drama Society is your first stop for getting stuck in, and a key resource for your theatrical career. It is very quick and easy to create a profile through the website (www.ouds.org). This will give you access to current news, other members and most importantly, the jobcentre, which publishes advertisements for actors, producers, marketing teams and other forms of assistance. OUDS is also a funding body for student drama, interviewing prospective production and marketing teams each term and providing financial assistance to a large number of shows.

Acting

Darling wannabe thespians, in the words of one veteran of the Oxford stage, primarily to go for it, go for absolutely everything. Audition away and the more you do, the more chance you have of getting a part. Secondly, have confidence in yourself, because if you start off by doubting yourself and thinking that you won’t be able to get into a play then you won’t get far. You must have absolute faith in your abilities. Thirdly, learn the importance of constructive criticism and not losing heart. Rejection happens – just pick yourself up, dust yourself down and start all over again!

Events

Oxford has two key dramatic events: Cuppers and the New Writing Festival. The Cuppers competition is run by OUDS and is exclusively for Freshers, encouraging newcomers to prepare a short piece, up to thirty minutes long, whether it is a snippet of Shakespeare or new-writing. Most vitally, Cuppers provides the structure and support needed to make a mark on the drama scene, work alongside OUDS and meet some of the people involved. The New Writing Festival giving budding writers the chance to see their creations on stage, out of which four finalists are chosen to be performed.

Theatres

The Oxford Playhouse, New Theatre, Burton Taylor Studio, and Old Fire Station are amongst the big names venues in the centre of town, varying in size and character. The Playhouse and the New Theatre attract mainstream professional shows, while BT and OFS cater to student theatrics. Individual college theatres, such as Keble’s O’Reilly and Wadham’s Moser, are also regular locations for performances. In the summer drama often moves outdoors, into college gardens and the University Parks. This diverse collection of venues offers an extensive choice and guarantees a wide ranging experience.

Reviewing

Those who can, act, those who can’t are critics, and Oxford caters perfectly to these cuddly types in the form of its two main newspapers, OxStu and Cherwell. The main difference between the two is that the latter is to be read, while the former is, at best, to be used as kindling, or perhaps as a cat litter-box lining. The perks of the job include free tickets and often free drinks, although admittedly being a critic, you will have already ostracised most of your friends and thus won’t have anyone to take with you to such wonderful events. But there’s much joy to be had striking fear into actors with a well-timed raised eyebrow or a stifled grimace.

Backstage

If your interest lies in directing, producing or marketing then one of the best things you can do is to seek like-minded others and form a team, applying together to a theatre. Watch out for shadowing chances which will regularly appear on the jobcentre, as these provide an excellent opportunity to gain first-hand experience. Joining existing teams is another great way of getting involved, whether your talent lies in realising artistic visions or handing out flyers on the highstreet.

 

Doubt Thou The Stars

Watching Jude Law in his most recent role as Hamlet in the Wyndham’s Theatre, I struggled to cope with conflicting views over the barrage of celebrities in the West End.
Theatre director Sir Jonathan Miller has in the past criticised the West End of having ‘an obsession in the celebrity’ and is amongst a growing group of critics targeting this new trend.
What, however, are the benefits of the celeb in the theatre and why is it important to question their place there?

I must admit that part of me was somewhat star struck by the Jude Law Hamlet. I was simply intrigued to see such a famous film actor plucked from Hollywood and placed into Shakespeare. I cannot have been the only one, for the show drew younger and keener crowds, and early hour queues at the box-office marked a new scale of demand.
It is this factor; its ability to attract an audience, that stands as the biggest pro for the celebrity thespianas, since this in turn draws general interest to the West End scene, promoting the theatres and their productions.

Part of me was frustrated, however. Primarily because it felt like the sparkle of A-list glamour was overwhelming some of the production’s main strengths. The unusual and delicate performance of Gugu Mbatha-Raw as Ophelia, for example, was denied the focus she deserved. Similarly, the stunning staging and use of colour was exceptional. Sadly it continually remained secondary to Law’s performance as the Prince of Denmark.

‘A-list glamour overwhelmed many of the production’s main strengths’

This leads me on to my second key criticism of celebrity endorsed theatre – if the celebrity just doesn’t quite cut the mustard, then the production is left in danger of looking rather daft. Law did not quite deliver enough in this role. Though his classical training was evident and his lines were delivered with passion and clarity, as the play progressed I became more and more frustrated with the consistently high levels of volume and anguish, and silently wished him to shut up for a while and brood around for a bit.

Undoubtedly, there would have been some unknown actor of more talent, denied the part purely for his anonymity. This rejection of talent extends beyond the individual actors to the interest of the producers in the productions themselves.The likelihood of a show even making it to the stage is enhanced massively by the status of the people involved. Once Joanna Lumley had made it clear that she could not commit to a long run transfer of the Sheffield production of The Cherry Orchard to the West End, they dropped it.

It is a risky business recruiting a celebrity in the West End; if it works, you can almost assure a sell out. David Tennant has demonstrated this with his well praised delivery of Hamlet, which justified the hype and put him alongside Patrick Stewart as living proof that it is perfectly possible to balanca career of both stage and screen performances, with exploits in neither medium hampering the other.

Financially, of course, the risk is small; if the actor in person cannot quite deliver; then little harm done, sales still guaranteed. Yet these shows run serious risk of receiving mediocre reviews and, the biggest fear of all, becoming just another production with yet another celebrity endorsement.

Tories back Oxford Conservatives

The Oxford Conservative Association (OCA), formerly Oxford University Conservative Association, has gained backing from the Conservative party and become part of the organisational structure of the Tory party. 

The change in constitution comes after last term’s allegations of racism and months of negative media coverage. The executive committee of the Association said they “recognised the need for change.”

Following the hustings controversy of last Trinity, in which it emerged that candidates were encouraged to make racist jokes, the University decided to remove the Association’s right to use ‘Oxford University’ in their name. The Conservative Association was also

banned from attending this year’s Freshers’ Fair.

The decision to amend the constitution was passed unanimously by an emergency meeting of approximately thirty members of the Association. Those present were “representative of all shades of political opinion in OCA,” according to Oli Harvey, President-Elect.

From now on OCA will be answerable to Conservative Future, the national organisation for young conservatives, losing the independent status it has clung to for over 80 years. All new recruits will have to become members of the Conservative party. President Alexander Elias will be encouraging the present membership to sign up to the party as well.

Harvey argued that the decision to link to the party was “not a response to the scandal directly”, however admitted that “the sorts of bad publicity we were generating can’t continue.”

When pressed upon the concrete changes the Association would be making, he stated that the executive is “deeply committed to making a serious and intelligent forum for debate”, which will include a focus on campaigning and supporting local candidates. Harvey also revealed that there would be moves towards signing the Association up to the University’s policy on equality. Elias insisted, “It’s all about changing the tone.”

There was initially speculation over whether the club would change its name, but Elias was able to confirm that the party was happy for them to continue using their old name. In addition to this, OCA will maintain a level of autonomy over its constitution, voting procedures and disciplinary procedures. The age-old tradition of weekly Port and Policy will continue to be held at the Oxford Union.

Questions have been raised over whether the change of status for the Association will be anything more than a token gesture.

Ben Lyons, co-chair of Oxford University Labour Club commented, “OUCA 2.0 are the same people who got elected at racist hustings. They are the same people who spoke in debates on reconquering the empire. And they are the same people who are still not allowed at Freshers Fair. This exposes the sham of David Cameron’s “progressive Conservative Party” as it goes out of its way to support a bigoted Bullingdon-lite.” 

Michael Rock, national chairman of Conservative Future, when asked whether he was convinced that OCA had changed, pointed out that the members of the Association involved in the hustings controversy were expelled from the party. However he added, “They [OCA] have to raise their standards to what we expect at CF.”

Others are yet to be convinced of the substance behind the changes OCA has outlined this week. David Barclay, JCR President of Worcester, pointed out that the association would require “close scrutiny to ensure that a return to the shame of the port-swilling pompousness of OUCA is never again allowed a place in Oxford’s public life.”

He added, “As Obama infamously warned us just a year ago, you can put lipstick on a pig; it’s still a pig.”

Alex Bulfin, ex-JCR President of University College commented, “Anyone who thinks that the rotten elements of OUCA will simply melt away into the night alongside its acronym needs to think again.”

Cherwell has been informed that a reform group of Oxford conservatives, already dubbed OUCF by the right-wing blogosphere, were in discussions with the party with the intention of establishing an Oxford University branch of Conservative Future.

Michael Rock confirmed that he had been in discussions with several alternative parties, but denied that relationships with other groups had progressed further than conversations.

He said, “I don’t think there’s any reason to have two separate conservative groups in Oxford.”

Harvey echoed this sentiment, stressing that OCA would be “the only officially recognised conservative association in Oxford.”

Reform groups are refusing to disclose details of their intentions or their current relationship with the party. However, one reformer expressed scepticism that formally attaching itself to Conservative Future would force the Association to change, commenting, “It isn’t their name that’s the problem, rather it’s the people involved in OUCA who make the society such a disgrace.” He added, “I’m not sure the bureaucrats at CCHQ realise how tough a challenge they have ahead of themselves.”

Another student conservative commented, “I am surprised that the party has decided to endorse the Association, especially after so many recent controversies and in the run-up to the election. I have been campaigning for change and reform for years and I truly hope this will bring the change the Association so needs.”

Stefan Baskerville, OUSU President added, “I think it will be a positive development for Oxford when there is a Conservative Association which will facilitate debate among conservative students, but is an association which does not and won’t tolerate bullying and racist behaviour.”

 

Obama wants CHANGE! $10 to be precise…

I am no cheapskate, but I do think I am justified in my indignation concerning a piece of legislation currently being debated in Congress, whereby the vast majority of international visitors are to be burdened with a $10 entry tax upon arrival in the US. The tax, which applies to all short-stay tourists who do not require a Visa, would particularly affect European travellers. For a family of six or seven, this would mean parting with a significant amount of money before so much as stepping out of the airport. The mental image of a play-ground bully pummelling a helpless child for his lunch money springs all too easily to mind. Even more disturbing is that payment of the fee will most likely require a credit or debit card, excluding those who do not possess one.p>

However, what is perhaps most infuriating of all is the excuse which the Americans are using to palm off this absurd entry fee. The money, amounting to millions of dollars each day, is to be funnelled into a non-profit organisation aiming to promote tourism to the US! That’s right, tourists to the US will be obliged to pay a sizable amount of money in order to promote tourism to the US; talk about preaching to the converted. I was perhaps naive and overly optimistic in my assumption that this sort of back-ward Bushian logic had been uprooted from U.S. Government.

Boris Johnson recently experienced similar disillusionment, expressing “disappointment” at the decision taken by the US embassy in London to ignore its backlog of fines and congestion charge payments amounting to £3.5 million. It was originally hoped that Louis Susman, Obama’s ambassador to the capital, would reverse the American policy of disregarding the congestion charge. These hopes were dashed with a curt message from an ambassadorial spokesman, “Our policy on the congestion tax is a long-standing policy decided on by Washington. The US government’s position is that this is a tax and therefore is prohibited by various treaties.” I find it almost intolerably churlish, that the largest economy in the world, with an estimated GDP of $14.3 trillion does not deign to abide by local regulations and cough up what it owes.

Still, what can one do in the face of the mighty US? Obama wants change, so y’all better open up your goddam’ pockets.