Tuesday 15th July 2025
Blog Page 252

BREAKING: Oxford Union and Student Union to merge into Union Union 

0

Like this has not already happened right before everyone’s eyes, it was announced today that the Oxford Union, known for its hacks and chums, will merge with the Student Union, known for its jazz hands and vegan sausages. The stellar deal is worth £506 million. The merger organisation will be called the Union Union. 

The new Union Union is sure to think they are way more important than they actually are. New political systems will be in place with a 385436845786-page constitution that absolutely no one will read. The new “Secretary” of the Union Union will be in charge of making sure as many scandals happen as often as possible. Anonymous tipsters will be encouraged to approach newspapers all over the country. 

The new Union Union president is keen to hack double the amount of people that they already do. Lichme Bumcheek shamelessly told Cherwell: “Hello! I hope you are well! Are you a member? Basically, I know we have never met before, lol, but basically I’m running in the Super Union election basically. I am going to be on seccies team for #innovate and would super massively enormously absolutely love for you to pre-register for the vote in 2 months. It would mean a lot :)))) I hope you like all the things that we do not do in office. Would make a massive difference to be supported by a stranger like you. Anyway, let’s go for a coffee sometime? I’d love to meet you! Follow me on Twitter as well! @LichmeBumBum. Cool, see you in the Bridge smoking area, lolol.”

Lots of cancellable speakers will be invited to the Union Union chambers, including activists for the repressed art of hate crime and corrupt billionaires. 

While white tie will be mandatory for debates, speakers will be prohibited from making noise of any kind to keep up with the core culture of the former Student Union. The use of alcohol and drugs will be actively encouraged. 

There will be no toilets in the headquarters, as the Union Union believes that this is a necessary change for the sake of environmentalism, in order to offset the damage caused by the amount of hot air the Union produces regularly. 


The Goldman Sachs executive who mediated the merger deal was the Oxford Union Chief of Hacks’s daddy. He told Oh Well!: “I am wonderfully delighted that my esteemed privilege still serves me well today. It’s marvellous to see our young generations build such valiant characters during their time who won’t get offended by everything! Out with sodding woke bigots!” Little did he know that he would get cancelled upon his first visit to the Union Union.

See the Oh Well and the puzzles section on the back page of print.

Prince Charles talks to University College students about access

0

During his recent visit to Oxford, Prince Charles spoke with a group of 12 ‘under-represented’ students to hear about their experiences and challenges. The 30-minute conversation took place in the residence of Baroness Amos, master of University College (Univ), after the Prince’s visit to unveil the new Levine building at Trinity college last Thursday. 

Baroness Amos is the first black head of any Oxford college and the co-founder of the Amos Bursary program for talented students of African and Caribbean descent. Recipients of this bursary as well as others who had participated in the Opportunity Oxford program were invited to the meeting. He was eager to hear about their journeys to Oxford and thoughts on access at the university. 

The conversation came at the request of Prince Charles, who is working on some projects to make university more accessible for students from a variety of backgrounds. Chloe Bardou, Univ JCR Access and Equality rep was one of the students who spoke to Prince Charles. She talked highly of the conversation, saying that although she “was a little bit starstruck”, he made everyone feel at ease and “was keen to hear our feedback on what did and didn’t work” in regards to Prince Charles’ ideas. 

The visit comes as the JCR at Univ is pushing for access to be a main priority for the college in the coming years. The college hosts regular visits from schools in Univ’s linked areas in South-East England and engages with direct outreach to these groups from student ambassadors. 

Additionally, the college participates in the Opportunity Oxford academic program, which aims to support students who come from under-represented state school backgrounds to prepare for Oxford teaching and living. This year also saw many new events put on by Univ’s JCR and MCR this year to improve inclusivity including a Diwali bop, Chinese New Year celebrations, candle lighting for Hanukkah and a college-wide Iftar. Bardou is pleased with progress like this. However, she hopes the college will do more to make it easier to put on such events and allow small changes that can make students feel more welcome, like rewriting aspects of their Flag policy. 

The meeting left participants optimistic about Univ’s inclusive future and the Prince’s decision to discuss such matters with students did not go unnoticed by those he met with, and the many others who gathered outside the master’s residence to spot him leaving afterwards.

Image credit: Ed Nix

Government cuts ties with NUS over ‘antisemitic rot’

0

CW: Antisemitism

After a series of scandals, the government has cut all ties with the National Union of Students (NUS), accusing it of having “antisemitic rot at its heart”.

The NUS, which is affiliated with 600 student unions and claims to represent seven million students nationwide, will no longer be allowed to send members to sit on government panels in the Department of Education, Office for Students, or the Student Loans Company. In their place, the government will seek alternative representation, including from individual student unions.

The universities minister, Michelle Donelan, told The Times that she was “deeply disappointed” to have to take what she sees as a “necessary step”. “NUS Presidents of the past, present and now future have now faced antisemitism allegations, yet not one has resigned over the matter — this is evidence of an antisemitic rot at the heart of the NUS,” she continued.

In 2016, three former NUS Presidents accused then President Malia Bouattia of “antisemitic rhetoric” after she described Birmingham University as “someting of a Zionist outpost”. The comments were described as “outright racism” by a Commons select committee.

More recently, the invitation of the rapper Lowkey to perform at its centenary event. Jewish students expressed concern that Lowkey has made comments referring to the “Zionist lobby” in the context of global finance, and accused the media of “weaponising the Jewish heritage” of the President Volodymir Zelensky of Ukraine to “stave off genuine enquiries” about the Ukrainian far-right.

The President of the NUS, Larissa Kennedy, allegedly told students who were upset by his presence to “self-segregate” and leave the venue. Lowkey cancelled his performance following the backlash, and the NUS released a statement expressing regret that the rapper had been the victim of “harassment and misinformation”.

More recently, the President-elect of the organisation, Shaima Dallai, was condemned for historic tweets in which she invoked the seventh century massacre of Jews in Khaybar, saying “Mohammad’s army will return #Gaza”. She has since apologised for the tweets, and said that she expected the backlash as a black Muslim woman who had taken a “pro-Palestinian stance”, which she says she has seen before.

Dallai has also referred to a Muslim cleric who said he would “shoot Allah’s enemies, the Jews” as a “moral compass for the Muslim community at large”.

Donelan has written to the Charity Commission to ask for an investigation into the NUS, and the Equality and Human Rights Commission to ask them to help the NUS resolve the situation.

Education Secretary Nadim Zahawi said he was “appalled” to hear of so many reports of alleged antisemitism linked to the NUS. He continued: “Jewish students need to have confidence that this is a body that represents them and, until the NUS have shown they can speak for all students, we cannot have them acting as student representatives on DfE boards.

“From the NUS’s initial response to our concerns, I am confident that they are keen to address these issues and welcome further updates from them. Antisemitism has no place in our society and we will stamp it out, wherever it occurs.”

The Times reported that a spokesperson from the National Union of Students said: “We are disappointed that the universities minister has press released that they will be disengaging with NUS rather than seeking to engage with us directly.

“Following a complaint about antisemitism we launched an independent investigation. We will be appointing a QC, in consultation with UJS [Union of Jewish Students], next week.

“We have sought to undertake the investigation in a serious and proper way, and are working in collaboration with UJS at every step of the way. Once the QC has been appointed we will be able to update on the process and timeline. We look forward to working with the government constructively on this matter.”

Faces of Oxford: a morning with Hertford Porter Nikki Benton

0

In those nervy interview days, the first person you met at Oxford was a porter. They handed over the keys to your new abode for the next few nights. We see porters every day, yet few understand or fully appreciate what they get up to.

It was when I locked myself out of my room in freshers that I first met Nikki.i. I had never seen a female porter before, which both surprised and interested me. Whilst Nikki is not the only female porter in the university, nor the first female porter that Hertford has had, she is one of a small minority of women in the profession.

The gender disparity that really jumped out to me. However, Nikki highlighted that being a woman in the role ‘hasn’t affected me at all’. Describing some of her main roles as a fire warden, first aider, email responder and student conversationalist she said that ‘all those jobs a woman can do’. You just need confidence, courtesy and professionalism. 

In recent years there has been much attention dedicated to narrowing the gender equality gap in the workplace. However, there are still many sectors that seem traditionally gendered. Nikki pointed out how strange and nonsensical it is, noting that one of her sons works as the only nurse practitioner in a nursery. It is just a societal norm that certain jobs are considered to be more feminine or masculine, but that doesn’t mean that it is right or impossible to change. Films such as Meet the Fockers emphasise the gendered stereotypes further by constantly promoting that Ben Stiller’s character is a male nurse. But, just as Nikki and her son prove, there is no reason why careers need to be gendered in this way. 

As a student, Nikki dreamed of being a chef, another sector which is heavily male-dominated. After missing out on the course she applied for, she went down the route of baking. However, that was not all she hoped it would be as she said that icing 400 donuts in the morning was not quite the career she had imagined. It was the hotel industry where Nikki felt she grew and developed the skills that she now implements in her day to day tasks as a porter. 

Perhaps one of the most fundamental parts of the job is looking after the college cat, Simpkin, and it turns out that liking cats is part of the job description. Interviewing for the job as a porter at Hertford, Nikki was asked if she was allergic to cats. This just goes to show how central the little black cat is to the college. Simpkin IV is part of the team as he joins the porters on their daily patrols around the grounds. Nikki describes him as a cantankerous character who can be stroked twice but never more. A tip that is good to know as a Hertford student. He is, as a result, a bit of a divisive figure and students, as well as Walter the Exeter cat, have faced the consequences of his third stroke. Although Nikki did note that in the notorious cat feud with Walter that Simpkin ‘always comes off worse’. 

However, Simpkin is not the only source of excitement. As gate-keepers of the college, porters are the first point of call for not only students but also celebrity guests. It was hard to miss the Hollywood buzz around Hertford last term as the set of Wonka landed onto the streets of Oxford. Students camped out in the Hertford marquee, eagerly waiting for a glimpse of Mathew Baynton, Jim Carter or Hugh Grant. However, always maintaining professionalism, the porters were tied to their office, (when they weren’t checking the Bridge of Sighs to ensure students weren’t hanging out the window). Although it must be noted the porters were on the student’s side, often having to remind the filming crew that the college is the student’s home not just a film set. 

Throughout filming, the porters were constantly answering questions about updates on Hugh Grant’s plans to go to his green room in college. But, unlike the rest of us, the porters stayed quite cool and calm in their office. It was, therefore, Hugh Grant himself that approached Nikki, confused that unlike the rest of the student population, she wasn’t falling at his feet. Their conversation was friendly, with Grant curious about her role too. However, what puzzled him the most was the fact that Nikki wasn’t wearing a bowler hat. To his question she answered that it’s because Hertford porters are ‘more relaxed and chilled out’, but quickly added this did not make them any less professional. 

Whilst Nikki didn’t manage to see the much sought after Timothee Chalamet, she could certainly hear the screams and gasps from outside the window. 

Of course, the job of a porter is not all glitz and glamour as the celebrity chats may suggest. There are jobs that no porter wants to do. It’s not hard to guess what comes bottom of the list: cleaning toilets and vomit. All Nikki had to say on the matter is ‘that kettle works hard’ pointing at the little metal appliance in the porter kitchen where we had our discussion.  

The timings of a shift porter allows for flexibility which enables Nikki to pursue other interests. Whilst of course she loves cats, it is her dogs Coco and Prince that happily await her return at home. 

It is clear that Nikki quite clearly loves being a porter. Every day is different, forcing her to think on her feet. Working as a shift porter moving from night to day especially brings a kaleidoscope of experiences. From cake to cats, Nikki proves that it is possible to break through stereotypes and that professionalism means much more than gender barriers.

Performing the unperformable – Preview: Carrie

Founding Fellas Productions have made an interesting choice in staging Carrie: The Musical at the Oxford Playhouse, which I watched in a dress rehearsal earlier this week. With its catastrophic production history (a book of Broadway failures is named after it), the musical is famously one of the biggest flops in theatre history. But given renewed interest in the material (from Riverdale specials to a dedicated podcast series) their choice is unsurprising, especially with the current popularity of dark, teen-angst products like Heathers: The Musical. Based on the Stephen King novel, and with an iconic Brian de Palma film adaptation, the tale of bullied, isolated teen Carrie White is well-known. Considering that Carrie discovers she has telekinetic abilities after her first period, there is also an opportunity to reshape it with feminist interest. If only the writers of the musical were drawn to explore that angle back in 1988. 

The musical, with a score by Fame! songwriters Dean Pitchford and Michael Gore, begins with a typical chorus of angsty, anxiety driven teens, though with a more concrete sense of concern than in the similar openings found in the musical adaptations of Fame! and Heathers. It is fortunate that Vanessa Silva’s often violent, searching choreography saves the opening number from cliché. As Carrie, Harriet Nokes delivers the rock score – with its leaping pitch and pulsating, brightly cluttered rhythms – with ease. It’s a pleasure to hear as her voice rises in power and contracts back to the soft interiority with which it began. The quiet despair she brings to Carrie’s loneliness develops into an equally quiet joyfulness in the second act. It’s a subtle performance and very well done. Nokes’ scenes with Eleanor Dunlop, playing Carrie’s devoutly religious and controlling mother Margaret White, are the highlight of the production. Dunlop, who was a standout in Persephone last year, shines in this role. Her vocal depth is powerful, her voice almost exploding in on itself whilst holding an eerily cold exterior, then falling into tense despair in her second act ballad.

Carrie: The Musical has never fully recovered from the divided creative team back in 1988, and there is a resulting unevenness to the material, which is no fault of the creative team of this production. The high school nostalgia of songs like ‘The World According to Chris’ and the sentimentality of ‘Unsuspecting Hearts’, though perfectly enjoyable, just never match the dark, belting intensity of the mother-daughter duets. In their scenes, Dunlop and Nokes are breathtaking together, so much so that I wished Dunlop could storm into the high school as Margaret White and knock the script’s underwritten characters into shape.

Grace de Souza clearly enjoys every second onstage as Chris, the high school ‘mean girl’, with a sickly smile throughout, whilst Luke Nixon, as the kinder Tommy, gives a sensitivity that contrasts the swagger of Chris’ boyfriend Billy, played by Oxford musical theatre mainstay Peter Todd. To these supporting characters the musical never provides much exploration, but the cast, particularly Nixon, manage to bring an admirable depth. Alongside this, Beth Ranasinghe, as Carrie’s sympathetic PE teacher Ms Gardner, aptly moves from a harsh authority over her students to the softer sympathy of student-teacher friendship.  

The role of kind-hearted Sue, who attempts to reach out to Carrie to the disgust of her peers, is split between two actors, Grace Olusola and Gianna Foster, across the run. They take very different interpretations. Foster’s voice more typically suits the material, with her ecstatic malice gradually replaced by wide-eyed idealism. Olusola is very different; her deeper voice brings a restrained softness that contrasts Sue’s classmates. Whilst Foster’s eyes sparkle, Olusola’s build towards interior despair. It is an interesting choice to split the character this way, given that the two performers have a very different dynamic with Nixon, who plays Sue’s boyfriend. At times, the supporting cast struggled to fully meet the demands of a challenging rock score, though when the band – under the musical direction of Beth Fitz-Patrick – surges into full rock-ballad mode, the cast are aptly supported. I’d particularly love Eleanor Dunlop and the cello player to release an album!

The cast is completed by a strong and confident ensemble. Ellie Tutt and Gillian Konko are noticeable standouts, with expressive and interesting performances. Considering that the true test of any musical is in the quality of the ensemble, there is stable grounding to the production. Tutt and Konko bring a firecracker energy to the choreography; Tutt’s delivery of the hip-thrusting, thigh-bending opening number is particularly memorable. In the second half, Emma Starbuck and Sav Sood bring a necessary humour to the prom sequence.

A test of any interpretation of Carrie is in its staging of Carrie’s telekinetic abilities, particularly in the infamous climax. On the whole, the stage effects successfully conveyed a levitating statuette and self-propelling books. However, I felt these key moments were underplayed and struggled to build a moody, horror-driven atmosphere. More importantly, the production’s finale lacked a true climax. I hope that by opening night de Souza and Todd have learned to pour their bucket-load with more accuracy (or perhaps just get them a bigger bucket), as there was no recreation of the classic climax pose so iconic in Brian de Palma’s film version. Whilst Sweeney Todd managed last term to use lighting alone to create an eerie, genuinely unsettling close, the finale of Carrie, though similarly impressionistic and drenched in red, struggles to salvage a badly structured script. However, the haunting, almost-symbolic movement from the ensemble does have great impact. It would be overly harsh to criticise a student production for the absence of expensive stage effects, and the production’s skilful use of remote-control mechanics is itself worthy of praise.

What eclipses any criticism is that Founding Fellas Productions have managed to prove that Carrie: The Musical is worthy of greater attention. What I have previously considered flawed material, lacking in musical depth and experimentation, I found to be compelling viewing with many standout moments. This is due, in no small part, to the talents of the cast and crew, and it is certainly worth a trip to the Playhouse to experience this unique musical. This team has demonstrated the value of a musical once deemed to be unperformable, and that is worthy of praise!

Carrie continues at the Oxford Playhouse until Saturday 21st May.

Image credit: Simon Vail.

New LGBTQI+ nightclub set to open

0

Next week will see the opening of the new LGBTQI+ nightclub, Glamorous, in St. Clements.  The venue is set to open on Friday 20th May, and builds on the success of the chain’s businesses in Birmingham and Coventry.

The venue will be “a blend of a modern cocktail bar and nightclub,” as proclaimed on the website.  Claiming to offer “a unique experience, from our cosy lounge, and cocktail bar on the ground floor, to our chic underground club room for the ultimate party”, the owners have promised that it will be an all-around ‘safe space’ for the LGBTQI+ community in the city.

The owner, Matt Eason, has chosen the site previously occupied by Be At One on St. Clements Road, offering Oxford residents a third LGBTQI+ nightclub in a different part of the city to Plush and the Jolly Farmers.

Eason promises that Glamourous will fit in between the nightclub atmosphere of Plush and the pub-like environment of the Jolly Farmers, the other two main LGBTQI+ venues currently in the city.

He is also keen to stress that he isn’t out to ‘cannibalise’ the business of those other locations, saying, “It is about being part of the community, not coming into Oxford being like the ‘big I am’ because we have a venue in Birmingham.  We are here to compliment what is already in the city.  The more that is going on, the better for the community is how we see it.”

Glamourous will be open every day, 12:00-03:00, with a daily happy hour until 11pm.  The company’s website also promises an exciting array of events alongside the normal opening hours, stating that, “Glamorous offers a range of nightly special offers on a wide variety of drinks as well as award-winning international drag artists, top UK drag artists, resident DJ’s, student nights and much more.”

Image credit: David Howard

Annual Town and Gown run takes place in Oxford

0

About 5,000 runners took part in the 40th annual Town and Gown 10k run through the streets of Oxford on the morning of Sunday, 8 May. The Oxford Town and Gown is the oldest run in a series of races hosted by Muscular Dystrophy UK (MDUK), a charity dedicated to curing and finding treatments for muscular dystrophy and other muscle-wasting conditions. 

The Oxford Town and Gown race dates back to 1982, when local runner Mike Cleaver, whose son had congenital muscular dystrophy, began the event as a way to raise funds and awareness for MDUK. It was later expanded into a series, with the Cambridge Town and Gown inaugurated in 2011 and Leicester Town and Gown in 2017. To date, the Town and Gown 10k series has raised over £2 million, according to the MDUK website.

This year’s 10k saw a significant increase in turnout compared to 2021, when just over 2,000 runners participated.

In addition to the 10k race, the organization also hosted a 3k race for juniors at the same time. The 10k runners began on South Parks Rd, looping around a number of historic and scenic locations in Oxford, including the Bridge of Sighs and a stretch along the River Cherwell, before concluding their journey at University Parks. The Town and Gown route is the only closed-road City Centre 10k in Oxford, according to the MDUK website. In 2019, Running Awards deemed the run “Best 10k in South East England.” 

Participants in this year’s 10k included students from the University of Oxford — including 72 runners from St. Hugh’s College alone, comprising the largest college team — as well as former Team GB Olympic rower Victoria Thornley and Lord Mayor of Oxford Mark Lygo.

“St Hugh’s are delighted to be able to support the event, not just because of the funds it raises for charity, but because it is an inclusive event, which brings together people of all abilities and promotes both physical and mental wellbeing,” St. Hugh’s communications manager Tessa Wood told the Oxford Mail.

Robin Ward, this year’s race starter, discussed the importance of funding the search for treatments and cures for muscular dystrophy in an interview with the Oxford Mail. “Taking part in events like this are a crucial part of this,” she said. “By starting the Town and Gown Race, my goal is to fundraise for all manifesting carriers of DMD and find effective treatments and a cure for the condition.”

The next run in MDUK’s series will take place on Sunday, 16 October 2022 in Cambridge.

Image Credit: Miguel A. Amutio via Unsplash

Receipts of Deceit – Kokiba Mohan

0

Kobi Mohan deconstructs the perception of corruption as a historically distant or ‘foreign’ concept. Recent British and foreign governments have been involved in scandals often inaccurately dubbed ‘sleaze’ instead of what they are: plain corruption. By analysing the broader legal and economic systems that have allowed corruption to flourish, Kokiba aims to turn her angry, frustrated feelings of powerlessness about the issue into musings on possible solutions and action moving forward, starting with issues of money laundering and stolen assets in London. 

Swift and shockingly appropriate action has been taken by the British government to put pressure on the Kremlin so far as the Russian invasion of Ukraine continues. Having once been all too enthusiastic to blindly welcome billions in Russian money to British shores, the government’s announcement just over a month ago of an ambitious raft of measures targeting Kremlin-affiliated wealth stored in the UK certainly came as something of a surprise. 

These measures primarily come in the form of sanctions on Russian investments and assets based in the UK, which have led, amongst other things, to the notable sanctioning of the £230m property portfolio of former-Chelsea owner Roman Abramovich, and the freezing of two of his associates’ assets, which, combined, totalled £10bn, making the instance the single greatest asset freeze in UK history. The intention behind this and other measures is to prevent assets from being returned to the Kremlin to be used to fund the continued Russian invasion of Ukraine. Undoubtedly, progress has been made to this end, and yet, these figures pale in comparison to the mammoth sums associated with the Kremlin that have made their way to the UK in recent decades and stayed here.

Determining the exact figure is a difficult task because of how Russian, or specifically Putin-affiliated individuals typically move their money; through a series of transactions often involving some combination of offshore satellites and shell companies in order to conceal the origins of the income. The Guardian reports that some £9bn has flowed directly from Russia to the UK in the past decade, whilst over seven times this, £68bn, flowed between Russia and one of Britain’s many offshore financial centres. How much of this money has direct ties to the Kremlin is hard to say, but the choice to divert funds using offshores, for example, should raise eyebrows regarding the source of these flows.

Privacy in regards to financial transactions is one thing, and secrecy is another. The means taken by many wealthy individuals surrounding Putin, more than not, tend to be of the latter sort. It is not that these structures being used are inherently corrupt, but rather that their use is indicative of some attempt to cover up illegal dealings, illicit sources of income and corruption.

The recent asset freezes of Billionaire Row properties with underground swimming pools and cigar rooms are an overdue attempt to end a decades-long policy of welcoming, with open arms and covered eyes, all investment into this country regardless of how murky their origins. The UK has long been attractive to global investment, illicit or otherwise. There are many conditions that make it so ripe for the role of global money laundering hub: its deregulated financial markets, (which, until recently, lacked stringent checks on the provenance of money) and perhaps more importantly, its overseas territories, the lax financial laws of which shield agents’ identities as they dodge taxes or launder money. 

Sanctions on Russian money fail to chase investments much further than Surrey, let alone the Seychelles, and yet each year millions of illicit money, some of it Putin-affiliated, is laundered through these territories each year. The freezing of assets may occasionally catch out the odd mansion in an oligarch’s collection, but for the most part, especially with the help of the finest lawyers and accountants money can buy, this can be dodged by simply passing a property onto a wife or a nephew, picking up a Chagall or two at Sotheby’s, or buying another property in cash from an all-too-willing London property manager all to divert your assets. For the unfortunate few whose properties have been subjected to unexplained wealth orders to freeze assets, still jail or any further punishment is not even a remote concern. 

Sanctions on russian money fail to chase investments much further than surrey, let alone the seychelles

After calls for further action to prevent more flows of dirty money, Kremlin-affiliated or otherwise, into the country, Boris’ government announced new beneficial ownership register, the function of which is to improve transparency around who benefits from the existence of certain assets, a bold proposal worthy of praise at the least for its ambition. Yet it seems loopholes were being drawn up even before Johnson could make a final TV promise about his conviction to the efficacy of these measures, because non-profit Transparency International has identified the inclusion of an eighteen- month grace period for those having to join the register, which is more than enough time for a skilled team of lawyers and accountants to draw up an alternate route for illicit financial flows. A £500 daily fine is to be paid by overseas-property-owning firms that fail to disclose relevant information regarding their ultimate beneficiary, which, doubtless, is a small hurdle for those with a disposable fortune in the hundreds of millions. On top of this, the allotted funding for the register is estimated to be grossly insufficient, seemingly setting the project up for failure. This is not to say the effort is not still worth acknowledging; the task the government has set for itself is formidable- the sheer volume of information that will need to be analysed and the ever incorrigible and opaque Kremlin being just two hurdles to face in the battle against Putin-affiliated dirty money. 

In 2011, David Cameron said maintaining the secrecy of overseas territories’ financial records “means minimising the burden of regulation so that business and entrepreneurship can flourish.” It is neither entrepreneurship nor business, but corruption that thrives on secrecy, and secrecy within the global financial system enables and validates those who accrue wealth through the exploitation of others. My hope is that the new policies being implemented represent a sincere, albeit incomplete, effort to tackle the problem of global money laundering and asset theft that the government has found itself to be complicit in as a result of its inaction thus far.

University launches graduate scholarship scheme for Ukrainian students

0

Oxford University is planning on offering a fully-funded scholarship scheme to refugees from Ukraine in the 2022-2023 academic year. The Graduate Scholarship Scheme for Ukraine Refugees seeks to provide academic training for qualified Ukrainian graduates whose lives have been affected by the ongoing war so as to allow them to contribute toward reconstructing their country.

The scheme will award up to 20 scholarships to graduates for admission to a range of full-time, one-year postgraduate taught courses. The University and participating colleges will co-fund the scholarships, which will waive both course fees and the graduate application fee. Additionally, each Ukrainian scholar will receive free accommodation and meals in their college, as well as a grant of £7,500 to support their living and study costs. To recruit scholars, the University is planning on running a campaign during May of 2022, which will involve extensive advertising among Ukrainian universities, as well as through social media and such informal networks as the University of Oxford Ukrainian Society. Scholars may also be recruited via the UK Government’s Homes for Ukraine scheme, the family reunification route, or other routes.

Additionally, the Oxford Refugee Studies Centre will serve as a hub providing scholars with access to seminars, events, and mentorship. Professor Louise Richardson, the University’s Vice-Chancellor, has stressed the institution’s solidarity with Ukrainians: “Like others, we have been horrified by the suffering and destruction caused by the Russian invasion of Ukraine,” she said. “Our community is united in our desire to do something to help. These scholarships represent our effort to provide an opportunity to students and academics whose scholarship has been disrupted by the war. We look forward to welcoming colleagues from Ukraine into the University of Oxford.”

Baroness Jan Royall, Principal of Somerville College and Chair of Oxford University’s Conference of Colleges, said of the new scheme: “The war in Ukraine continues to cause immense suffering and long-term repercussions for those affected. It has been inspiring to see the speed and unanimity with which the colleges have rallied to support this important new programme. In time, there will be more for us to do in order to lessen the impact of this terrible war – but this scheme will give Ukrainian students a chance to rebuild their lives now, which is invaluable.”

The opportunity was devised by Professor Lionel Tarassenko, President of Reuben College, whose paternal grandfather came from Eastern Ukraine as a refugee. He spoke extensively of the scholarship scheme: “Like everyone else, I was horrified when the conflict started in late February and immediately began to think about how best to help the people of Ukraine,” Tarassenko said. “Having been an academic in the University for the past 34 years, I had no doubt that Oxford could play its part in supporting students fleeing from the conflict. The University offers a fantastic range of high-quality Master’s courses. As the former Head of a large University Department and now the President of Oxford’s newest college, I was able, with the support of senior colleagues in the University and its colleges, to devise a graduate scholarship scheme for Ukraine refugees. I am thrilled that this scheme should now enable Oxford to welcome 20 refugee scholars starting one-year Masters courses at the beginning of next academic year.”

Beyond the particular scheme, the University is building on its commitment to supporting refugees by working on designing welfare support for current undergraduates who have been impacted by the war, as well as financial support for those who need it. Those impacted by the conflict who are due to begin their course in Oxford in October of 2022 will also have the opportunity to benefit from the University’s support plans.

Image credit: Karollyne Hubert

University sees ‘stark’ decline in EU students post-Brexit

0

The number of pupils admitted to Oxford University from EU countries has halved in the past five years, according to the University’s annual admissions report, which also indicated that the decline was expected as a result of Brexit. Elsewhere, the data showed continued growth in the number of state school pupils and applicants from China.

The admissions report revealed that the average number of EU admissions has fallen from an average of 260 over the last four years to 128 this year. Whereas students from the EU made up 8% of undergraduates admitted five years ago, that figure now stands at just 4%. Brexit negotiations raised questions over changing fee structures for foreign pupils with the government, and the bloc failed to agree on a replacement for the previously popular Erasmus programme. Erasmus is an EU programme that provides free movement and education exchange between registered universities and institutions, but the UK withdrew from the scheme following Brexit.

Vice-Chancellor of the University Louise Richardson said that the decline in EU admits “was expected as a result of the changing fee regime occasioned by Brexit, but it is stark.”

The decreasing trend was also noted by the Universities and Colleges Admission Service (UCAS) who stated that students from the EU had submitted far fewer applications in the UK higher education system after the Brexit withdrawal. UCAS figures highlight that only 31,670 EU students applied in the 2020-2021 period — 50% less than before Brexit. 

These falling numbers have been made up by a combination of more ‘homegrown’ British students and increased applications from Asian countries, especially China. In 2021, UK students comprised 59.2% of total applicants and 81.6% of total students admitted — a figure 9% higher than the average proportion of UK students admitted across Russell Group Universities. (The Russell Group comprises 24 research-intensive universities in the UK.)

EU students were only 8.8% of total applicants and 3.9% of students admitted, while non-EU (and non-UK) students were 32.1% of total applicants and 14.5% of students admitted. The People’s Republic of China continues to be the country most represented in overseas applications and admitted students.

The statistics on state school admissions paint an increasingly positive picture, however: in the last five years the number of successful applicants from the sector has increased by 10% to 68%.

To further its progress in this area as well as increase application numbers from the state sector, the University is launching a foundation year programme named Astrophoria. The project is entirely funded by a private, anonymous donor and will fund 50 students for one foundation year, starting in 2023.  As well as course fees, the fund will cover living expenses and accommodation in full.

According to the announcement, the fund will look to support those with “significant academic potential, but who have experienced severe personal disadvantage or a disrupted education which has damaged their ability to apply for an Oxford undergraduate place.”  

“We are delighted to announce the launch of the Astrophoria Foundation Year, which will have a transformative impact on the lives of the smartest students who have experienced grave disadvantage,” Richardson said. “The programme will enable us to accelerate the progress we have made, as demonstrated in our annual admissions report, in broadening the socio-economic backgrounds of our undergraduate students. I am deeply grateful to the generous donor who shares our belief in the power of education and our commitment to identifying and nurturing talent.”