Sunday, May 11, 2025
Blog Page 255

BREAKING: Michael-Akolade Ayodeji elected SU President 2022-23

Michael-Akolade Ayodeji has been elected as the President of the Oxford Student Union for the 2022-23 academic year. 

3704 people turned out to cast 29049 votes, a 32% increase over the last election for president, where 2506 voted. A plurality of voters came from Jesus College, whose JCR won £300 in pizza vouchers. 

The leadership contest also had relatively low numbers of candidates standing, with only five students running for the spot, compared with eleven last year. 

In the Cherwell Town Hall profile published on Monday, we described him as “no ordinary student”. He told Cherwell: “‘I live for being busy. That’s why I do photography, American football, the SU, the Union. I have to do things’.”

In his manifesto, Michael stated he is committed to combating SU apathy, working on holistic access and improving the student experience. He said that he aimed “to ensure that there are not just opportunities but also sufficient support for people from all walks of life to excel”. He also stated: “I am not afraid to speak up when necessary.”

Michael’s experience includes President Elect for the Oxford Union for Trinity term 2022, former Member of the West Midlands YCA, former JCR DisRep, Access & Equal Opportunities Officer, and member of Class Act and Disability Campaigns. 

Speaking after the results were announced, Michael said he was “incredibly honoured and privileged” to be elected SU President and described the campaign process as a “valuable learning experience”. 

Other students elected to positions include:

Vice President Access and Academic Affairs: Jade Calder

Vice President Charities and Community: Anna-Tima Jashapara

Vice President Graduates: Shreya Dua

Vice President Welfare and Equal Opportunities: Grace Olusola

Vice President Women: Ellie Greaves

Student Trustees: Uri Sharell, Serene Singh, and Daniele Cotton.

NUS Delegates: Aditi Premkumar, Anas Dayeh, Ciaron Tobin, Alexander Nowak, Sarah Akintunde, Mundhar Ba-Shammakh, and Serene Singh.

Oxford Pride and Oxford Poverty Action Trust have been voted as the SU’s local Raise and Give (RAG) charity, with Amnesty International and Donate for Refugees being voted RAG international charities.

Image Credit: Cyril Malik

Ethiopia sees ‘staggering increase in food insecurity,’ Oxford study warns

0

Ethiopia’s food insecurity crisis is rapidly worsening to alarming extents under severe drought and civil conflict, shows Oxford’s Young Lives study, which has tracked the effects of poverty on 12,000 young people in Ethiopia, India, Peru, and Vietnam over 20 years. 

41.7% of young people in Ethiopia surveyed reported their households running out of food in 2021, compared to 26.2% in 2020. 75.3% have been worried about running out of food in 2021, an almost 100% increase compared to 38.3% in 2020. One in three of those surveyed said they or their family went to sleep hungry. 

The findings emerge from Young Lives’ latest December 2021 survey involving 326 young people in Ethiopia’s southern regional state of Southern Nations, Nationalities, and People’s Region (SNNPR). Households in the region comprise 9.9 people on average, indicating that the survey results are potentially applicable to around 3,227 people. 

These alarming figures represent a staggering increase in food insecurity compared to when we contacted the same families at the end of 2020, before the drought set in,’ says Dr Catherine Porter, Director of Young Lives, who says civil conflict and COVID-19 have also exacerbated the hunger crisis.  Around 5.7 million people in Ethiopia affected by the ‘devastating’ drought currently require food assistance, and 6.8 million are projected to need urgent humanitarian assistance by mid-March. The lowland regional states of Afar, Oromia, SNNPR, and Somali, spanning south, southeastern, and northeastern Ethiopia, have felt the blow of the drought most keenly, while in northern Ethiopia, Tigray, Afar, and Amhara have also been ravaged by civil conflict. 

Map of Regions of Ethiopia. Source: Jfblanc, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons.

Ethiopia, Kenya, and Somalia are the three countries most impacted by the drought in the Horn of Africa. The East African peninsula is facing the driest conditions recorded in 40 years, caused by three consecutive failed rainy seasons, resulting in 13 million people facing severe hunger, said the UN on 8th February. 

In Ethiopia, the drought has led to mass crop failure and livestock deaths. Inflation rates and food costs have consequently skyrocketed, leading to increased displacement and soaring malnutrition rates. 

37% of children in Ethiopia under 5 are prone to acute malnutrition, according to Gianfranco Rotigliano, UNICEF Representative in Ethiopia. On a longer timescale, the ‘potential negative long-term impacts of severe malnutrition on children’s growing bodies and minds’ is a cause for deep concern, says Dr Alula Pankhurst, Young Lives Country Director in Ethiopia. 

Should the upcoming rainy season in March and April 2022 fail again, increased food insecurity and even famine could befall the country, warns UNICEF. 

In Ethiopia’s northernmost Tigray Region and neighbouring Afar and Amhara, food insecurity has also been triggered by the Tigray War, which has rocked the region with civil conflict between Ethiopian federal forces & Tigrayan forces since November 2020. All sides involved have since committed human rights violations including attacks on civilians, sexual violence, and targeting of ethnic minorities. 

Both UN Emergency Relief Chief Martin Griffths and Ethiopian WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus have described the Ethiopian government’s withholding of food, medicine, and fuel from Tigray as a ‘blockade’. Yet Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed denied the existence of hunger in Tigray in June 2021, even as the UN and international aid groups announced around the same time that famine was hitting 300,000 in the region. 

The UN World Food Programme (WFP) estimated in January that 83% of people in Tigray were hungry, and 2 million, or almost 40%, of Tigrayans were suffering from ‘an extreme lack of food’. Across Tigray, Afar, and Amhara, a record-high 9 million people are in need of humanitarian food assistance. 

The conflict has also seen government-imposed bank shutdowns, store closures, and communication blackouts. For the Young Lives survey, researchers were unable to contact participants in Tigray and areas of Amhara due to communication hurdles. 

International agencies are making urgent appeals for funding in a race against the exacerbating hunger crisis in Ethiopia. The WFP has launched a Regional Drought Response Plan for the Horn of Africa that calls for US$327 million in donations as it risks running out of funds and supplies in Ethiopia. The UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) requested US$130 million in January for its Horn of Africa Drought Response Plan. UNICEF is appealing for US$31.8 million for its Ethiopia Emergency Drought Appeal. 

Young Lives expects to deliver full findings on food security and its impacts on the education, employment and mental health of young people in March 2022. Based at Oxford’s Department of International Development, the international, longitudinal study of childhood poverty tracks the changing effects of poverty on 12,000 young people in Ethiopia, India, Peru, Vietnam, with 3,000 of them in Ethiopia. Its team provides research and evidence for national policy and programme makers to effect change. 

Originally launched at the start of the millennium and planned to last 15 years, in line with the timeframe of the UN’s Millennium Development Goals, the study is now entering its 20th year. Noted for its duration, diversity of contexts covered, high retention rates, and innovative research methods, Young Lives has provided insight into the complex interrelations between health, education, and poverty in the countries studied. 

Image: Torsten Martens

What’s happening in the chapel: The best chapels and churches in Oxford

There are churches and chapels of some description on nearly every street in Oxford, so it can be difficult to know which ones you might like to visit. If you are going to worship, there is of course the question of denominations, along with the practicalities of the times of the services. If you are going for a look around, what sort of thing are you looking for? Do you like modern architecture, or – in my case – something with a bit more history? I thought it might be a good idea to share some of my recommendations with you, so you can go and explore for yourself. I have decided not to rank these (don’t worry, Lincoln will always be at the top) because there are many chapels I still haven’t visited! The churches on this list will be a mixture of university/college affiliated churches and churches that are open to the general public (although, as you will see, there is a good deal of overlap), and they should be fairly easy to access, either through asking around at colleges or just turning up and visiting!

Lincoln College Chapel

It would be a crime for me to write about the chapels and churches and not include my own college! It could be argued that Lincoln has two chapel buildings, with the library once being All Saints Church (one of the dreaming spires!), and if you have a look through the railings around the library you can still see some gravestones from the churchyard. The ‘modern’ chapel was consecrated in 1631 and for fans of stained glass, we have gorgeous windows, but I will leave it to you to work out what all of the scenes correspond to (personal favourite is a very odd looking whale). The chapel roof and floor have also been recently restored, so the chapel is looking at its best at the moment, but to get the full experience of the gilding on the ceiling I would recommend coming to an evensong and seeing the candlelight reflecting off all the gold and stained glass.

University Church of St Mary the Virgin

Popular with school trips and coach tours, University church is arguably the best whistle stop tour of the history of Christianity and the University in Oxford. Everyone from John Wesley to John Henry Newman have preached at University Church and it still maintains the tradition of notable visiting preachers. University church was also the site of the trial of the Oxford Martyrs, with a memorial erected to them near the memorial to John Radcliffe, but to discover more about the history of the church and the role it plays in the university it is best to have a quick visit. Whilst you are there, you can go up the 13th century tower and have excellent views of the city (excellent photo opportunity), then have a cup of tea or some lunch in The Vaults. University Church is a lovely place to sit and reflect after a long day in the Bodleian, or during a sightseeing trip!

Oxford Oratory Church of St Aloysius Gonzaga

This is probably better known as the Catholic Oratory, and it has a fascinating history that I neither have the skill or the wordcount to go into, but the reason why it’s on my list is the beautiful art and icons. Before I came to Oxford, I had never been inside a Catholic church, so I was rather taken aback by the grandeur and the different chapels. Luckily, there was someone friendly in the gift shop who happily explained some of the important elements to me. I would really recommend going for a look around and in particular trying to spot the saints on the sanctuary (which is behind the altar). I remember finding St John Chrysostom after wandering in from a tutorial at John’s, which struck me as my tutorial was focused rather heavily on him. But, if saints aren’t your cup of tea, I would also recommend having a look at some of the lovely patterns on the ceilings, or just sitting at a pew and taking in the atmosphere.

Wadham College chapel

Ok, I admit it, I did sneak in here after a tutorial. It is worth a visit, with gorgeous stained glass (you may have noticed a theme, I love a bit of stained glass). I’m sure it’s lovely during a service, but I haven’t yet persuaded a Wadhamite to accompany me so I can visit in a more auspicious manner, rather than sticking my head round the door and creeping in and out.

St Mary the Virgin, Iffley

This admittedly is neither in central Oxford, nor is it in any way affiliated with the university. However, it is a beautiful Romanesque church and it would be a shame to leave it off this list, as it is one of my favourites. The journey would be manageable by bike or bus on the main road, but you can also walk to Iffley along the canal, and there is a pub and a small shop in the village if you fancy a snack. There is something lovely about walking from the main road, with all the noise of the traffic and into a peaceful churchyard. The physical distance from Oxford itself, probably plays a part in this, as it feels like a little holiday to be away from libraries, lectures and classes, just for a short few hours. The inside of the chapel is incredibly calming, with simple, modern decoration. I would recommend a visit to this church after a long walk, then followed by a nice warm meal, with no thought given to impending deadlines or essays.

This is certainly not an exhaustive list of my favourite chapels and churches, but these are a few that I would like to share with you. I do hope you visit them (everyone is welcome at Lincoln College Chapel), not just to worship or appreciate the architecture, but to find some stillness in what can be such a hectic town.

Image Credit: David Iliff, CC BY-SA 3.0

Table 13 Review: An eye-opener to what vegetables can do

0

What Georgia Gallacher has accomplished with her first foray into the restaurant industry is truly extraordinary.  Table 13 manages to capitalise on recent booming trends of plant-based eating, a focus on food provenance, and supper clubs whilst not falling into the trap of becoming a gimmick. The focus here is on the quality of the final product and each of the nine dishes we try are stunning, brilliantly thought-out creations.  The atmosphere that she creates through hosting in her own kitchen is unique and her willingness to chat with diners throughout makes for a culinary experience to treasure.

I was lucky enough to visit Georgia in Wheatley with a friend on a Wednesday night, a special experience as  she usually only opens on Thursdays, Fridays, and Saturdays.  As we were the only two diners, we were really able to talk in detail with the young chef about the ethos behind the restaurant, how it got started, how she got started, and above all the food itself. This is why the supper club model works so well, especially when the host is as personable as Georgia:  even when fully booked there are only ever ten guests at a time.  Everybody sits at one long table and receives the dishes at the same time – Georgia was keen to highlight that this aspect of the meal was something she held dear.  She pointed out that there is something special about coming somewhere to eat where everyone has a shared interest in their food and is excited for the culinary experience to follow.  Not only is she warm and welcoming but highly professional. Having studied in hospitality and worked in front of house roles in Australia as well as several famous restaurants across London she effortlessly puts guests at ease.

Her passion is clear to see from minute one. Through each of the nine dishes there is a focus on using seasonal local produce from local producers and merchants, elevating plant-based eating beyond dishes that are vegan just for the sake of it.  Here, vegetables come into their own in ways that are hard to imagine.  Her ‘seed-to-stalk’ approach, (coined by Gallacher herself and a play on the ‘nose-to-tail’ eating popularised by St John) is about using every part of a vegetable, even those that might usually be thrown away.  Take the cauliflower dish for example: not only do you savour the main slice itself, pan-roasted in butter with garlic and thyme, but the florets are removed, roasted, and pureed to produce a stunning reduction with the leaves added as a garnish atop the Brazil nut crumble.  The fact that the menu changes every month means that Georgia is constantly thinking about the development of new dishes and as a result – no stone is left unturned at Table 13.

Not even the drinks pairing escapes this special treatment.  Working with local Oxford company L’Altre Vi, all wines are produced using low-intervention and sustainable methods in Catalonia and expertly paired with the plates they accompany.  The Oxford Artisan Distillery provides spirits and the whisky for the butter that accompanies the bread course.  

That bread course merits special mention.  The only constant on the ever-changing menu, her soda bread uses stout from a local brewer as well as honey and oats from Wesse Mill.  It was paired with a homemade whisky butter and stout reduction from that very same brewer.  Georgia is working her way around different breweries every month and as you might have guessed they are all local and all focussed on sustainable processes.

Table 13 isn’t just about lofty ideals though.  What stands out most is the food.  Time and time again, Gallacher produced dishes that were genius in their creation.  Evidently carefully planned out and developed, the use of contrasting textures and flavours surprised and delighted throughout the evening.  The first of our dessert courses is a perfect example: a Jerusalem Artichoke ice cream which was stunningly cool and smooth.  It was served atop a bitter cocoa crumble that contrasted with garnishing kumquats and Jerusalem artichoke chips to create a party in our mouths.  Sustainability and veganism are an added bonus here.  As Georgia says herself, “Table 13 is about surprising people, not lecturing them. To me, food is so much more than just sustenance – it is a source of enjoyment, creativity, fun and friendship.  This trumps all.”

Going forward, Georgia eventually plans for a restaurant beyond her old family home.  For now though she is focused on delivering this stunning and unique experience from her kitchen.  In the summer there are plans for an extra table outside, taking capacity to 20 covers each evening.  Regardless of the expansions, however, she wants to preserve the intimate feel and to continue to serve the same dishes, at the same time, with the same care dedicated to each and every guest.

So, give Table 13 a try.  At £70 for all nine courses and the drinks pairing, you are unlikely to find a better value tasting menu anywhere.  You might just have your eyes opened to what vegetables can do and what, with care and skill, they can become on a plate.  Whatever happens, I can promise that you will have an exceptionally enjoyable evening in the hands of a young chef who will surely go on to shine in the industry.

South Asian upbringing: Laila-Majnu

0

What Lord Byron called ‘the Romeo and Juliet of the East’ has passed through the Arabic, Persian, Turkish and Indian languages. The story of Laila-Majnu, of Old Arabic origin, was written by Qays ibn al-Mulawwah in the 7th century about his love Layla bint Mahdi. 

The poem became popularised as a praise of soul-binding love and permeates literature of the cultures it has touched. In the South Asian subcontinent, the story of Laila Majnu is widely used in modern art and literature to refer to the tragedy and intense love of the ‘star-crossed lovers’ (to compound Byron’s orientalism) and express the idea that two lovers have been created for one another.

The autobiographical anecdotes from al-Mulawwah himself are short and very loosely interconnected, but poets such as Nizami and Amir Khusrow have extended on them to create love poems that stand as original literary works in their own right.

Today, I’ll tell you the story as I know it, as it has permeated through the South Asian culture and has come to stand as its own confession of love, separate from its literature.

We don’t know where and we don’t know when, but we do know that there were two tribes whose children shared a school. There was, at this school, a Qais, from whose mouth fell pearls when he spoke and a Laila, who was bright as the morning with eyes dark as a stag’s. 

They shared one single glance that sent their hearts ablaze and muddled their every thought and Qais was determined to woo her. Each time they gazed on one another; Love’s flaming taper blazed more intensely. 

So immersed in love, the whole world watched as their hearts became one. Till Qais became sick with the passion of his love, watching the ringlets of her curls and her dark eyes flashing quick and bright, he gazed and gazed and found no rest for Laila was forever in his sight.

Till one day he sought her in her home, climbing the ivy on the wall and crying ‘Laila! Laila!’. Dejected and forlorn he finds his love is gone but her scent still scintillates. He laid prostrate in his grief and whispers in vow, 

“Your form never quits my sight,

Fetters my thoughts by day and my dreams by night;

Could it be that

The Evil eye has lifted and struck my heart? 

It’ll be your beauty that sped the dart.”

As the morning sun rose, Qais became Majnun, maddened by his love for his Laila. 

He rose with his eyes all tears and his soul aflame and never stopped repeating his Laila’s name in all his wanderings. 

Faint and reckless as he was, he passed through the desert in search of his Laila, for Majnun’s love was not of this earth, nor could this earth hold it.

He searched and searched as his heart was consumed with grief and was sighted by Laila’s tribe, who reported back to her chieftain father that there was a madman amongst the sands chanting her name with his loose hair and outstretched arms, and that he often either dances in love-daze or prostrates on the ground, warbling the melting songs of their love. 

Laila’s blush sealed his death warrant. They ventured the desert, seeking to soak it with his blood and Laila was wrung with groans and tears. Across the desert span, each breathed a prayer for the other and the sands sighed in mournful strain as Majnun moves towards home.

Laila was hastily married off to a rich and noble merchant, a handsome man with a rose complexion and Majnun was hunted for many days and nights until it was decided to leave him to the talons of the desert that he had condemned himself to.

But, even on the night of her wedding, Laila heard of her lover’s constant woes, as his poetry and songs of her pervaded the lands to reach her walls.

She pines alone, consumed in deep despair. She sheds no tears until the fatal passion invades and the agony sears. 

And if you must know, then know that, cursing the poison of Love, she claims that her prayers for Majnun themselves were written with the pen of Love. She claims that f they should be the dark shame of night, then the lovers’ Resurrection will come with the rising sun. 

She begs her mother for her Qais:

‘All I desire

Laid on my pyre, pillowed in my grave,

Is that anguish-tormented youth, who

With his ambrose words of truth,

Blended our souls into one;

That he may come 

And I may feel his first touch

In the tears he weeps upon his Laila’s tomb.’

And Laila’s mother watched her beauty settle into the trance of demise, watched as she dissolved like salt into tears, how she fell into a spell of shivers, prostrate on the sands and never, never, never rose again. 

All the skies wept for their fate and weeping Majnun’s friends washed his white bones and with ceaseless tears performed the final funeral rite, laying him mournfully by his Laila’s side. 

And gently, in that cold, dark earth, one grave hides their corpses, that death was no divorce of this one promise that bound their hearts. In final safety, their souls from their graves moved as one. 

Source: Niẓāmī Ganjavī (1141-1202), trans. Atkinson, James (1780-1852), ed. Atkinson, James Augustus (1832?-1911), Loves of Lailí and Majnún : A Poem from the Original Persian of Nizámi. London: David Nutt, 1894. Presented to Oxford Bodleian Indian Institute November 1894.

Image Credit: Metropolitan Museum of Art, CC0 1.0

Concerns raised over Oxford researchers linked to Chinese military

0

A Times investigation has revealed that collaborations between British scientists and institutes with deep connections to China’s defence forces have tripled in six years.

326 Oxford academics have collaborated with professors from Chinese military universities, known as the “Seven Sons of National Defence,” since 2015. Graduates from these universities were banned from entering the United States in 2020, as part of American efforts to curb suspected Chinese theft of intellectual property and technology. Oxford University has also accepted more than £24 million from Chinese sources since 2015, the third highest in the UK.

This picture is replicated across the Russell Group. Imperial College London and the University of Cambridge have accepted a combined £100 million from Chinese sources since 2015. Researchers from across the prestigious association’s component universities have also collaborated with Chinese military academics on 1,069 papers in 2021. Many of these papers were on sensitive “dual-use” research, involving technology that can be used for military aims as well as civilian purposes. This included: drones, electromagnetic technology capable of firing projectiles, cutting edge aerospace materials, radar, jamming equipment and high-performance batteries.

Often, the military applications of this dual-use research are barely disguised. Terence Langdon, of the University of Southampton, has co-authored 18 papers on materials science with a Chinese warhead designer. His Chinese co-author’s research specialism is to develop new materials technologies in ammunition, warheads, “damage mechanisms and endpoint effects,” and nanomaterials. Meanwhile, Imperial College London accepted £5 million to fund research into aerospace materials from three companies linked to the Chinese military. Two of those companies are subsidiaries of the defence contractor that manufactures China’s fighter aircraft. All are under U.S sanctions.

It is against this backdrop that British security officials have begun to voice their concerns.

Whitehall sources speaking to the Times warned that Britain was in an “arms race” with China and must protect cutting-edge technology that would give a military advantage. Tom Tugendhat MP, chairman of the foreign affairs select committee, said that “some British academics have turned a blind eye to the implications of working on military technologies with China”. 

Echoing this sentiment, Martin Thorley, a Chinese international policy specialist, said: “The findings appear to demonstrate some sector-wide failings in terms of checks on donations and research partners. They also include some instances of co-operation on projects with clear military applications that suggest outright recklessness by the British institutions involved. For some British universities and their staff, there appears to be a genuine risk of contributing directly to the development of technology employed by the People’s Liberation Army.”

Considered most worrying is research focused on railgun technology. These cutting-edge weapons use electrical currents to generate magnetic fields capable of accelerating a projectile at high velocities. Both the Chinese and the US governments have been looking to develop the technology to equip naval vessels and aircraft carriers with weapons and devices that launch aircraft.

Professor Chris Gerada, of the University of Nottingham, has co-authored four papers with Chinese colleagues from one of the “Seven Sons of National Defence”. These papers detail the applications of compulsators, power-supply devices that are a key component of railguns. The university said the research was “wholly focused” on reducing carbon emissions in passenger aircraft, was fully peer-reviewed and published openly. However, the Chinese university profile for one of Gerada’s co-authors lists his research interests as “special motors” used in fields of national defence, as well as “flywheel energy storage technology and its military-civilian integration application”.

Government guidance recommends that universities carefully consider their collaborations, check whether their research has “national security implications” and establish whether their funding partners pose “ethical or security concerns”. The guidance, aimed at preventing unwitting academics being lured in by hostile states, was compiled by the Centre for the Protection of National Infrastructure (CPNI), a wing of MI5. It warns that joint research can be “vulnerable to misuse”, urging them to check whether their research could benefit the military of hostile states and to consider the reputational risks of collaborations. It highlights the issue of dual-use research, where technology can be developed for civilian aims but redeployed in the military. 

Despite the warnings, British academics are increasingly working closely with Chinese colleagues who make no secret of their military research aims. A Times source alleged that “the government seems to be more bothered about placating universities than actually dealing with the fact that many of them are teaching the Chinese military how to build super weapons.” 

A Russell Group spokesman said: “Research-intensive universities treat issues of national security extremely seriously, undertaking robust due diligence checks in line with government guidance.”

A government spokesman said that international research collaboration was “central to our position as a science superpower” but added: “We will not accept collaborations which compromise our national security and the government continues to support the sector to identify and mitigate the risks of interference.”

The University of Oxford has been approached for comment.

Image: Gadiel Lazcano

Oli Hall’s Oxford United Updates – W4

0

Weekly Round-Up

Another week and yet more drama at Oxford United.  At the end of it, the men’s side have two more great results in the bag and are sitting pretty in fifth, just five points off MK Dons in third.  On Sunday, the women faced a historic cup clash.

Tuesday night saw the men travel to the DW to take on one of the league’s big favourites for automatic promotion.  A brilliant start saw the U’s take the lead through Matt Taylor inside 25 minutes but Callum Lang responded with an equalizer just thirteen minutes later for the side currently sitting second.  The sides battled hard throughout the first half but in the end either could have stolen the three points and both were probably left happy with a draw.

Going into Saturday, the Yellows faced a different challenge against Portsmouth.  Oxford were favourites before kick-off and took the lead after just six minutes through Luke McNally.  They would only lead for four minutes before being pegged back by Michael Jacobs and more early drama followed five minutes later when the visitors went down to ten men.  Pompey held on until the break and then took a shock lead six minutes into the second half.  Oxford stayed calm though and the deserved equalizer came through a Cameron Brannagan rocket with the clock running down before Nathan Holland scored another late winner to steal the three points back from the jaws of defeat.

The women had no such luck though as they fell just short against the Crawley Wasps.  The 1-0 defeat saw them bow out of the National League Cup at the quarter-final stage, success they will rightly be proud of after so much fixture congestion this season.  The only goal of the game came through a Stephens header just after the half and despite their best efforts, the Yellows couldn’t fight their way back into it.

Next week will see the women return to league action against the London Bees as they continue their promotion push.  The men travel to Accrington Stanley under the lights on Tuesday before returning home to host 10th placed Bolton on Saturday in another packed week.

Match Report:  Oxford United 3-2 Portsmouth

It was another crazy game at the Kassam for Oxford as another late Nathan Holland strike saw the Yellows secure a massive three points after being behind with eight minutes left to play.

Six minutes into the affair, Billy Bodin swung in a trademark corner delivery and Luke McNally nodded the Us in front.  The elation of the home fans was ended just a few moments later though when the visitors equalized:  a defensive mix-up saw Kieron Freeman offer up a chance that Jacobs couldn’t miss.

Joe Morrell was somewhat controversially sent off after just sixteen minutes when referee Samuel Barrott adjudged him to have gone in far too high on Cameron Brannagan.

The visitors stayed resolute though in spite of total Oxford dominance.  Bazunu was sensational in the Portsmouth goal to deny several big chances for the home side but going into the break it seemed like it would be just a matter of time before Oxford retook the lead.

However, Ronan Curtis hadn’t read the script and did superbly well to work an opening down the right-hand side and slot past Stevens in goal to make it 2-1.

Oxford needed inspiration and brought on Nathan Holland in an attempt to find some.  Find some they did: Cameron Brannagan capped what is surely the standout week of his career with a rocket from 25 yards out to bring United level on 82 minutes.

Then the chances just kept on coming and Nathan Holland ran straight at the heart of the Pompey defence deep into injury time.  He somehow managed to dance his way through, stayed on his feet, and slotted past a distraught Bazunu to score off the post and wrap up the three points in front of a euphoric home crowd of well over 10, 000.The promotion chase is very much still on then and next week will see United travel to Accrington Stanley before playing host to 10th placed Bolton.  Both games are highly winnable and favourable results elsewhere could see Oxford up into third before the week is out.

Image courtesy of Darrell Fisher

Collective security and individual freedom in the Covid era: how clear-cut of a conflict is there?

0

The more disputatious sort of those opposing circuit breaker lockdowns and vaccine mandates, two of the “statutory” (mark the inverted commas) bellwethers of western nations’ scramble to curb the spread of Omicron, would likely agree with the famous lines from Percy Bysshe Shelley’s 1819 lyrical drama Prometheus Unbound:

. . . but man

Equal, unclassed, tribeless, and nationless,

Exempt from awe, worship, degree, the king

Over himself . . . 

Linking a work supposed to have been recited to Eleanor Marx by Edward Aveling, her partner and a founding member of the Independent Labour Party at the turn of the 19th century, to a neoliberal (most people would agree) sensibility may raise eyebrows. Not to mention that approaching a matter where the lives and deaths of countless human beings are at stake through a literary prism may provoke familiar quibbles about the actual value of distilling concrete experience into airy abstractions for the sake of self-administered intellectual back-patting. Such criticisms would be far from mere pettifogging, but working through the rich (and unintended?) ambiguity of Shelley’s lines should urge us to puzzle over the all-too-neat conflict between collectivism and libertarian individualism through which most of us are likely to have been interpreting state responses to the pandemic.

 There is, of course, a defense to be made of making sense of our times as a series of successive jolts undergone by the vaunted cornerstone of Western culture: individualism. We’d better be aware, though, of the nuances intrinsic to the perennial quandary between individual rights and collective security that is now manifesting itself in our day-to-day experience; nuances that highlight the folly of restrictively affixing, in cookie-cutter fashion, politically identifying labels to the diverse implemented (or proposed strategies) to tackle Covid we see all around us. 

Individual freedom, the West’s cherished doctrinal brainchild, is of course no abstract ideological self-profiling. It is enshrined in declarations that may not per se be enforceable, legally binding, but have over time been codified into international law. Article 3 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights guarantees every individual’s prerogative “to life, liberty and security of person,” while article 7 of the European Charter of Fundamental Rights declares, in a similar vein, everyone’s right “to respect for his or her private and family life.” Needless to point out that in their core, these prerogatives are woven into the fabric of neoliberal or libertarian and welfarist credos alike. And despite their glaring socialist and communist implications, the lines by Shelley that I just quoted suggestively blur any boundaries between mutually antagonistic positions. Notice the way in which his exalted “man” morphs from a protocommunist archetype of a particularly extreme form into a paradigm of self-ownership at which any libertarian would beam approvingly: a “king/Over himself.” We may do well to beware of Twitter platitudes like that of Arizona’s current state treasurer, who back in September furiously branded Biden’s federal mandate – requiring vaccination or weekly testing of companies with more than 100 employees – as “socialism in action.” It is not only that (inventively) uncovering abstract spectres behind a single policy attests to the looming absolutes and dramatic oppositions studding a partisan mentality (i.e., obliging all employees in a company to comply with certain illness prevention standards is socialist, making whether employees in a company get vaccinated or tested discretionary is pro-choice and hence libertarian). It is also simply that such labelling risks coming across as genuinely oblivious as to what a truly socialist anti-Covid strategy should entail, which should in turn spawn a whole other series of questions: is there such a thing as a “truly” socialist policy? What would a “wholly” socialist policy against Covid consist of? Would any left-wing policy worth its salt ever possibly exclude elements commonly labelled as neoliberal, centrist, libertarian, individualist, etc?

This is, of course, not to contest the fact that there are gulfing discrepancies between neoliberal and welfarist approaches to tackling ever-new surges of the virus that stem from an ethical rift between individual and societal well-being. Diametrically divergent outlooks are decidedly real rather than a collective superstition. Australia’s libertarian firebrand Harrison Mclean, a self-christened “Freedom Activist” on Twitter, was arrested back in September for inciting a week-long mayhem against vaccines and lockdowns in Melbourne. It’s equally no shock that Olaf Scholz, Germany’s new chancellor and a member of the country’s Social Democratic Party, has vocally endorsed compulsory vaccination for the general population. The rationale underpinning such a decision, so commonsensical political wisdom would have it, being that each citizen is neither no less nor no more than any other entitled to the right to remain alive insofar as a vaccine is the closest route to safeguarding this right at present. Given the equal value of each human life, the imperative to secure the collective survival of a unit of individuals trumps ethically the duty to see to the security of a particular individual’s right over their body. Isn’t this as thorough, as ideal a fulfillment of article 7 of the Universal Declaration as one should wish for? Come to think of it, doesn’t a slew of individuals shielded unexceptionally against a life threat bring the right to life and security into tenfold as great a fruition as respecting a single individual’s volition to bar foreign matter from entering their organism does? Not an outlandish take on the Declaration, surely. Taking this logic further should show that relying on a binary political terminology to neatly define statutory actions may be untenable if seeking to ensure a collective whole’s survival equates to defending a myriad of constitutive parts. Theoretically, at least, to the extent that a democratic socialist (or social democratic) policy is in no danger of devolving into a version of the communist authoritarianism to which the 20th century has born horrid witness, it shuns an inhumanly abstract “whole” in favour of a diversitarian collectivist vision. A vision firmly anchored in actual social experience – experience that is manifold, messy, and ever-liable to disparities.

Numerous instances at our tense sociopolitical juncture debunk the rigid political labeling that has gone rampant. Widely displayed anti-vaccination slogans may chiefly be the shamelessly prideful creations of neoliberal right-wingers, but it is worth noticing that it is Austria’s liberal conservative government, led by the Austrian People’s Party, that has been outlining a stringent policy of mandatory vaccination. Given the party’s Catholic affiliations, it may as well be that it is its basis in Christian humanism that is motivating its decision, given its explicit self-labelling as anti-socialist. Things are no less opaque in the leftist camp. It’s no surprise that far-leftists should denounce draconian measures against Covid such as those implemented in China at the dawn of the pandemic as egregiously authoritarian. And many left-wingers’ credulity toward paranoid conspiracy scenarios points to an all-too-familiar moral outrage over the mileage to be gotten insidiously out of a societal crisis by elite contingents: the current state of affairs being a godsend for governments with an autocratic streak by legitimising a crackdown on citizen autonomy, pharmaceutical giants fishing for swayable guinea pigs to churn out absurd loads of cash. No wonder then that while a left-leaning figure like Scholz in Germany advocates mass immunisation, the leader of France’s democratic socialist party La France Insoumise and 2022 presidential candidate Jean-Luc Mélenchon has criticised the French parliament’s approval of vaccine passports required for accessing bars and restaurants, cultural venues, and domestic travel.

It is by no means politically naïve to see the vast majority of lockdown and vaccine mandate refuseniks as neoliberal avatars and those supporting collective immunisation against any “pro-choice” argument as compatible with a welfarist ethic. Yet it is at the same time useful to take stock of what Shelley’s lines from two centuries ago imply, even in spite of themselves. Political doctrines are constructed categories that often seep into one another in theory as much as in praxis. Genuine political savviness should complicate our outlook on the inveterate clash between universalism and particularism that the Covid era has brought into fresh attention. 

Tumisu via Pixabay

The world ain’t so bad after all

0

The issues facing many of us as we begin 2022 revolve around distance and separation from loved ones. Stories abound of families separated as a grandparent falls ill, unable to say their goodbyes to those they love. Online funerals, numbers limited, prevent, yet again, those very important and very final goodbyes. And of course, this is happening all the while those ‘business meetings’ at Downing Street rage on. And Omicron’s now a big deal by the way. Certainly, it would appear, at first glance, that the situation is all rather gloomy.

The pandemic has, for all of us, manifestly altered our lives. Isolation has caused calls to mental health helplines to skyrocket, nearly doubling over the past two years. It is unbelievable to think that we are approaching the two-year anniversary of the beginning of the March lockdowns in 2020. There is a certain difference in colour when I think of the memory of the January prior, receiving my Oxford offer, and dreaming of a summer travelling around Europe with my friends; instead, I was confined to my room, anxiously prepping for a Biology exam that I was told I might have to sit, never getting the closure from a school I so loved, and never passing through a rite of passage that all before me had gone through. 

Thus, on entering university in the autumn of 2021, there was a great deal of unease amongst the matriculating class of 2020. School, it seemed, had not finished. Certainly, I felt as if one day I would be back in my Politics A-Level class sitting next to the resident flat-earther reading Mr Farmery’s classical PowerPoints. One of my best friends told me that, mid-way through our first Michaelmas term at Oxford, she felt the same too, but also as if ‘no one knew the real her’. I too was feeling rather out of sorts, a shadow of my former self. 

A central agent of this change has been the transition to much activity online. Though I’m not the massive clubbing-type to the great disappointment of my friends, my freshers was stuck behind a desk, alone in my room. Naturally, I say this with a great deal of hindsight, but perhaps I would actually have rather enjoyed my friends pulling me out of bed at 10pm to go out in my pyjamas … an event which did, I must shamefully admit, happen come the end of the year.  

It is a revealing point: that come Trinity term, restaurants, bars, and social areas were re-opening, and crucially, that people were drawn in this direction. As England challenged for its first ever European Championships in June and July, it was as if COVID had become an urban myth, thousands lining the streets. Certainly, come the beginning of our second Michaelmas term, there was a sense of optimism about the new academic year. The pandemic was a thing of the past; and even when we realised it wasn’t, it was the social interaction that we craved, the personal connections formed that couldn’t be fostered behind a screen. And I finally went clubbing, but only the once. 

As I speak to this years’ freshers as Hilary term begins, I’m glad to hear not only that they had a good Michaelmas but that they’re all back for their second term of the year. I personally did not fare so well alone in the winter months in lockdown, absent from Oxford in Hilary; the photos of my beautifully shaved head resembling a certain Wallace of Wallace & Gromit, as my friends chose to see it, will certainly testify to this. 

What the pandemic has revealed is our fundamental need for personal connection and interaction. Although it may have altered the practice of interaction, it has not led to a manifest change in people’s hearts. People crave interaction, and people need it to function at a very chemical and biological level. I imagine that in years to come the records we leave behind will be fiercely studied by anthropologists and sociologists alike, looking to understand what drives people, and what connects them. The pandemic has revealed the fundamental inter-connectedness of people, and that the world in which we live is one in which we are all a part, one in which we are all valued, and one in which we all have a responsibility to look after each other. Indeed, a great by-product of isolation has been friends increasingly ‘checking-up’ on each other, particularly amongst men, when perhaps it would have been a sign of weakness to do so. The pandemic has been a very uniform, blanket-level experience that has shed light on the real ties that exist between people. 

This has been corroborated when talking to many of my teammates in the various sports teams I’m a part of. The way they have opened up to me about their troubles, but also of the support they have received, is indicative of this awareness of the value of our friends and of our relationships. I’m far from predicting the end of the materialist and commercialist climate in which we’ve seen grow in the last 75 years; I’m just trying to say that the world really ain’t that bad after all, and that people do, fundamentally, care about each other. 

Therefore, I write this piece looking back on both my own experiences of the pandemic years through an oddly romantic hue. We have witnessed an immense period of change that has revealed not only so much about our society but also so much about ourselves. It is easy to imagine that the pandemic will force a changing way of life, but this presupposes a lack of human agency that certainly hasn’t been corroborated as the pandemic has begun to ease. Over lockdown, Netflix was perhaps the nation’s most popular pastime, and I began another binge of Friends for perhaps the 6th time in my short nineteen years (certainly not the nation’s most popular pastime). But did you see how many people turned out to watch Spider-Man: No Way Home? If there’s one thing for sure, it’s that people love the cinema, or perhaps it’s Andrew Garfield’s rugged handsomeness; but even more so, that people coming out of a time of isolation and fragmentation, have realised how much they loved the world in which they used to live. The return of fans to the cinema – and also to the football I might add – has highlighted what we truly love by their absence; and as a by-product shown that perhaps the pandemic won’t be as devastating in the longue durée. Despite the sorrow and the agony we have all experienced in the last two years, a silver lining can nonetheless be found. The pandemic will pass, and life will return to normal; but this, I hope, will be a normality in which we appreciate those around us, and look for the good in society and in others which the pandemic has so evidently revealed. 

Roksana96 via Pixabay

Mansfield College creates Oxford’s first LGBTQ+ History professorship

0

Oxford University’s first professorship in LGBTQ+ History will be created at Mansfield College following an endowment of £4.9m.

The Jonathan Cooper Professor of the History of Sexualities will “lead and expand the study and teaching of LGBTQ+ History at Oxford”. The Professorship is the first fully endowed post of its kind in the UK.

It is named after Jonathan Cooper, a gay barrister who died suddenly in September 2021. He was involved in a number of landmark campaigns promoting LGBTQ+ equality across the world. He helped found the Human Dignity Trust in 2011, which challenged laws which persecuted individuals on the basis of their sexual orientation and gender identity. The Trust supported activists and fought cases in Jamaica, Northern Cyprus, and Belize, among many other countries.

Cooper’s husband, Dr Kevin Childs, said: “Jonathan Cooper was many things – an enormously respected human rights lawyer, an activist for LGBTQ rights, the rights of indigenous peoples and the right to self-determination, as well as a believer in the rights to dignity and to living an authentic life, and a tireless advocate for people living with HIV/AIDS. But his first love was history and if there’d been space in his life for him to be anything else he would have been an historian. So, it is particularly fitting that this first Chair in the History of Sexualities is named after him, for it acknowledges his passion and love as much as his reputation.”

The gift was made by the philanthropists Dr Lisbet Rausing and Prof Peter Baldwin, historians and co-founders of the Arcadia Fund. Mansfield is in the process of securing further funding to establish a research cluster around the Professorship which will “push research boundaries, spark debate and nurture new scholars in this burgeoning area.”

Processor Lyndal Roper, the co-director at the Centre for Gender, Identity, and Subjectivity at Oxford, said: “LGBTQ+ History is where some of the most vibrant historical research and writing is now happening and the creation of the Jonathan Cooper Chair of the History of Sexualities is an important milestone for the field. The coming generation is questioning what gender means, and now is the time to establish this exciting new scholarship.”

Image: Ian Taylor