Sunday 20th July 2025
Blog Page 295

Words of Wisdom: Rusty Kate 3rd Week

0

CW: This is a mildly comedic column written by a drag queen agony aunt. It is not for the faint hearted, and contains sensitive topics which may cause distress to some readers.

​​Your favourite depraved, debaucherous drag-ony aunt is back! Aunt Rusty is back, and here to help with your silly little lives. She’s dishing out important life advice five hundred words at a time, all out of the goodness of her heart (and the need for charity work to count towards her parole).

Remember to submit your questions through the link on the Cherwell Facebook page or @rustykatedrag’s Instagram – you’re guaranteed complete anonymity. Loose lips sink ships, and Rusty is anything but loose.

Right, onto the issues you couldn’t fit into this week’s counselling service session…

Dear Rusty, Someone shat in my front garden last night. I’ve reported it to the police, but I don’t know what to do with the actual poo. I wish this was a joke. Thanks for your help, Confused in Cowley

Look, there’s no need to get the actual police involved. I’m sure the perpetrator of this faecal fiasco just needed to drop off a little parcel on their way home from the Bullingdon – you know what the toilets are like in there! I’d take a nice, soft grassy patch in the front garden of an unsuspecting Cowley resident over the syphilitic toilet seats in that ‘club’ any day. Who wants to catch worms for a THIRD time? Not me! As much as it’s an inconvenience to you, you need to put yourself in the other person’s shoes – they really needed that shit, and your front garden was a welcoming host.

If you’re looking for something to do with the remains, I’m sure a shit from a high-fibre diet will make excellent manure. Oh, and word of advice – take out the nettles by your front gate. My ankle is still a little swollen.

Dear Rusty, I think I might be unlovable. But only to the people I want. Please advise

At least you’re self-aware enough to ask the question. I’ve also experienced problems with self- worth before too, so I understand where you’re coming from. It happens every time I go on a date – the men I’m seeing are always so nervous and filled with self-doubt that most of them don’t even turn up! They just never think they’re good enough for me, and I’m left there, drinking a bottle of wine to myself.

Anyway, enough about me – let’s talk about untouchable, dysfunctional, unlovable you! And let’s not limit it to only the people you want – people you don’t want might find you repulsive too. I have a little insider knowledge as I can see who sends the questions, so I know for a FACT that most people would probably find you repulsive. Maybe stick to your natural hair colour and whack a bit of concealer on that facial mole – it’s the least you can do so that the rest of us can keep our dinner down.

Words of Wisdom: Rusty Kate 1st Week

0

CW: This is a mildly comedic column written by a drag queen agony aunt. It is not for the faint hearted, and contains sensitive topics which may cause distress to some readers. Be prepared for dirty douche water, relationship issues, adultery, and finding out why your parents never loved you.

Your favourite depraved, debaucherous drag-ony aunt is back! Good old Aunt Rusty has been run through so many times that she could be legally declared a tunnel and privatised by Western Railways, but instead she’s here to give you her advice – just take it with a pinch of salt.

Remember to submit your questions through the link on the Cherwell Facebook page or @rustykatedrag’s Instagram, as her words of wisdom are more readily available than her throat in the Plush toilets.

Right, onto your issues…

Is it my fault my parents fought so much?

Does the Pope shit in the woods? Is the moon made of foreskin cheese? I don’t know, stop fucking asking me. Maybe if you stopped asking stupid questions your father would still be around.

What do I do if the douche water isn’t running clean?

Don’t stress, I haven’t douched since 2013. If a man can’t deal with an unexpected guest, then he shouldn’t be breaking into people’s back doors! Also, fibre supplements are a bottom’s best friend. No need to turn your hole into an off-brand water world show, just push through until it looks more like a Nickelodeon slime special. Or until you’re loose enough to fold in on yourself like a single sock in the wash.

Hey Rusty! I’m trying to get over a guy I know isn’t right for me – he can be proud and quite shut off (he can really put the arse into Mr Darcy when he wants to) but he can also be so charming and thoughtful and we used to be really close. We were never really together and it ended over a miscommunication which is making it really hard to let it go – it just feels like we’re fighting for no reason. I know I shouldn’t go back to someone who’s spoken to me the way he has… but he is unfairly cute and the whole feud feels so futile! What do I do?

I feel qualified to answer this question because I too have faced prejudice at pride, as much as I wouldn’t call entering the wrong hole a miscommunication. Mr Darcy does have his advantages though – his little Fitzwilliam probably being less than little. In all seriousness, you’ve answered your own question: you know he isn’t right for you and there’s nothing you can do to change that. You were never really together, which can often make things all the more painful when it comes to a bitter end, but just remember this – charming and thoughtful don’t make your legs quiver. If you really want to keep seeing him, whack on some headphones and let him go to town. If he’s being as rude to you as you say, don’t take it lying down – or do, if you’re not flexible enough for doggy. You say he’s unfairly cute, but at the end of the day, even Mr Darcy will eventually have a receding hairline.

I’m worried Rusty Kate will steal my man – What shall I do?

Be better or let it happen – it’s a dog-eat-dog world, and I’m a sloppy eater.

Introducing Cherwell’s Dragony Aunt: Rusty Kate 0th Week

0

CW: This is a mildly comedic column written by a drag queen agony aunt. It is not for the faint hearted, and contains sensitive topics which may cause distress to some readers.

Boy troubles? Girl troubles? They/them troubles? Good old Aunt Rusty is here to help!

Rusty Kate is Oxford’s premier cum-filled crossdresser, known for turning looks, tricks, and straight men seven nights a week. She’s decided to take a short break out of her busy schedule to act as Cherwell’s Dragony Aunt, and help sort out your pathetic little lives one mildly comedic column at a time.

Submit your questions through the link on @rustykatedrag’s Instagram page, and she’ll be dishing out all her words of wisdom for you to lap up like the Queen’s corgies after Liz is done with the peanut butter.

In the meantime, here’s one question Aunt Rusty can answer…

“Dear Rusty Kate, it’s my first week at University and a boy on my flat has been giving me the eyes. He’s really hot but I don’t want to make things awkward, what should I do?”

At least he’s been giving you the eyes and not the finger. My normal motto is don’t shit where you eat, but then again, call me Ella Fitzgerald because I’m not adverse to a little scat.

In all seriousness, give it a bit of time and make sure you don’t do anything ridiculous. Maybe grab a drink with the guy and see where things go! It could be a flatmates-to-lovers trope, or you could fall flat and be forced to avoid a boy you live with after a drunken one night stand in Freshers week. In any case, use your common sense – and for god’s sake, use protection!

Escape to the culture-side

0

There is a certain magic in the escapism that art offers, in our ability as humans to completely fall into worlds and emotions that do not belong to us. Not to be underestimated as mindless distraction, there is something powerful in how art permits us to create a different reality to the one we find ourselves in. 

Since the beginning of the pandemic, the question of how long art can exist as a form of escapism is something I have ruminated over quite a bit. As the world seemed to spin out of control in the first lockdown, we cannot be blamed for seeking out alternate realities. Some people discovered new creative outlets, whilst others filled their days with consuming art, whether that be artworks, films, books, music or TV shows. Our willingness to become lost in stories where words such as lockdown or pandemic had little meaning is unsurprising, and evident in trends from the time. Take the ‘Normal People’ phenomenon of April 2020. Without detracting from the show’s deserved success, arguably the twelve-hour intimate exploration of the protagonists’ relationship resonated so widely due to the audience’s desperation for, well, normal. The show’s emphasis on the significance of physicality and touch only played upon people’s longing for connection. It was a reminder of the lives and emotional ties that had been paused, a respite from our strange new surroundings. 

This relief could only be offered for so long, however. It was inevitable that the new emotions and anxieties would seep into the art being produced. Yet interestingly, many early creations were met with mixed receptions. ‘Love in the Time of Corona’, a hasty pandemic project released in August 2020, was particularly attacked by critics. Critic Adrian Horton remained ‘sceptical that there’s anything that can capture a period we’re still very much in,’ which confirms the suspicion that people still wished to suspend belief for a moment longer. It was, quite simply, too soon to see our newsfeeds replicated in the fiction that we turned to for escape. 

Yet as we distance ourselves from the past two years, I would argue that there is value in seeing the world around us reflected in the art we consume. In her book ‘Funny Weather: Art in an Emergency’, Olivia Laing discusses how art certainly cannot solve everything. It cannot provide a concrete answer, nor can it explain fully what has happened. It can, however, be reparative for the future. It offers a new way of seeing, opens our eyes to the alternate possibilities surrounding us. The best art, in her opinion, is ‘more invested in finding nourishment than identifying poison.’ Whilst art may not allow us to change what has already happened, it can provide us with the hope of what follows. 

I think most importantly, art allows us to catch our breath. Whilst we are so desperate to rush towards getting back to normal, I will speak for myself in saying that I am not ready to move on just yet. As the days ahead stretch out and are filled with seeing friends and family, alongside gratitude, I can still feel the discombobulating nature of what we have experienced upon my shoulders. As if I am floating somewhere in the sphere of the new normal, not quite grounding my feet. Art allows us to sit in moments like these; it freezes time and gives emotions the space to be felt. It allows us to make better sense of ourselves. I would like to catch my breath. 

Whilst I agree that reminders of bleak lockdowns are not in demand, I would like to see art that reflects the shift in our collective experience and channels our emotions. I would like to see art that discusses where we are right now, here, in the aftermath. That offers a light for this messy in-between stage where everything is yet to fall into place and lets us know that we are not alone. I hope we do begin to see stories of people trying to scramble back into social interactions; university freshers who haven’t had normality since they were sixteen, twenty-somethings thrown into the adult world unexpectedly, people grieving for the time that was lost. Stories of how love has been changed; people who fell into connections immediately, people who still can’t seem to shake the distance placed upon them. Tales that feature the pandemic of course, but at heart are mostly just about people learning to live again. 

Escapism will always have its blissful moments, but there is also a kind of beauty in the strangeness around us. I hope we don’t turn away from it. 

Image: Nick Fewings/ Unsplash

Patricia Kingori becomes youngest Black Oxbridge professor

0

Patricia Kingori, a research fellow at Somerville College, has become one of the youngest women to be awarded a full professorship in Oxford’s 925-year history, and she is the youngest ever Black professor at Oxford or Cambridge.

Kingori is a sociologist based at the Ethox Centre and Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities. Working at the intersection of sociology and medicine, her research explores the ethical dilemmas that arise in the “everyday ethical experiences of frontline workers in global health” across a variety of contexts throughout Africa and Southeast Asia.

She currently leads a team of researchers exploring the evolving concerns around “Fakes, Fabrications, and Falsehoods in Global Health.”  The project, which is funded by a four-year Wellcome Centre award, seeks to understand the people, places and processes involved in contemporary concerns about fakes in global health.

“To have my body of work recognised in this way is a great honour, and I am deeply grateful to the many people who have inspired and supported me so far,” Kingori said in a press release from Somerville College.

Outside of Oxford, she has advised multiple organisations, ranging from the World Health Organization, Medecins Sans Frontieres, and the Obama White House.

This milestone is especially important for Kingori, as she has dedicated her professional life to advocating for greater Equality, Diversity and Inclusion in academia. She spearheaded the creation of a visiting scholarship for Black academics at the University of Oxford, in addition to a student internship scheme aimed at increasing diversity. In 2020, she contributed to the Wellcome Trust’s Reimagine Research Initiative.

Kingori is also a member of the Global Health Bioethics Network and leads a team providing qualitative research support for early-career researchers in low-income countries, including Malawi, Kenya, and Cambodia.

Born in Kenya and raised in Saint Kitts and London, Kingori graduated from the Royal Holloway, University of London and the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine.

Image Credit: Philip Allfrey / CC BY-SA 3.0

Review: Horoscope by Beth Simcock

0

Beth Simcock’s bright and colourful large-scale work The Zodiac lights up the exhibition space at Oxford’s Modern Art Gallery. A recent Ruskin graduate and one of the winners of the Platform Graduate Award, this is Beth’s first solo exhibition, open to the public until 31st of October. The grand stature of the piece impresses upon the viewer immediately, comprising 12 canvasses each representative of a different astrological sign. Alongside the painting, a horoscope written by Simcock contextualizes the piece as well as adding further layers of meaning. 

Visually, I love Beth’s vibrant and unique style of magical realism which is dominated by reds, pinks and glitter. Exploring themes of memory and storytelling are central to her practice which is reflected in this work through ideas of collage and things being obscured. Practically, using acrylic paint enabled Simcock to create this feeling of nostalgia by working in layers. The act of spraying things out and repainting them, as well as making use of the plastic medium to incorporate mistakes as part of the piece, seen concealed but visible under layers, literally reflects the process of doing and undoing which she foregrounds as integral to creativity itself. 

Simcock’s inspiration and references for the work span a diverse range from historical tapestries to modern popular culture as well as including auto-biographical elements. Working in two directions, the piece scans both left to right, driven by the repeated bright baby pink horses and dogs which leap across the canvasses, and in a cyclical fashion which mirrors the act of reading the zodiac itself. As a motif, the horse plays a central role in several of Simcock’s paintings as a personal in-joke with herself. Layers of meaning are created through this motif by referencing the horse as a prominent figure in art-history and therefore tying the work into the tradition of painting, whilst directly referencing the Bayeux tapestry with their positioning and figurative representation and simultaneously exploring horses as a reflection of different modes of femininity. 

In terms of genre, Simcock describes her work as narrative paintings which aim to capture scenes to do with memory and the relationships between people and objects. In this piece, a couple of the figures are self-portraits functioning as references to the self as well as capturing the work’s historical context as Simcock was painting in an empty studio due to covid regulations but, of course, could use herself as a model. Some other figures are paintings of friends and family members who posed for the work, and the rest are amalgamated faces, combining multiple people and their features drawn from collected drawings and reference images, a process which Simcock charmingly terms “Chinese whispers with drawings”. The Zodiac is a highly creative, engaging and thought-provoking work, feeling relevant within modernity yet also reflecting the past – definitely worth a visit!

Image: Rosa Bonnin

Review: “Kid A Mnesia” by Radiohead

0

Kid A and its sister album Amnesiac helped introduce electronic instruments to alternative rock, and were a risky sonic departure from Radiohead’s guitar-based and immensely successful OK Computer. But there is a sense in which OK Computer and Kid A were also a natural progression. If OK Computer was interested in collective anxiety about a rapidly technologizing, isolating world, Kid A represented the realization of those fears. In Kid A the machines have arrived, in the form of an Aphex Twin and Autechre-inspired soundscape, and what remains of the human element is scrambling around for whatever meaning, structure and coherence it can find. Listening to “Idioteque”, “Everything in its Right Place” and “Kid A” you sense that the organic voice is keeping the electronic forces at bay, but only just. And sometimes the electronic forces gain control, as in Amnesiac’s more experimental “Pulk/Pull Revolving Doors” and “Hunting Bears”. Then the world is looking very inhuman.

As with 2017’s OKNOTOK, this re-issue of Kid A and Amnesiac is a twentieth anniversary celebration of one of the group’s most creative periods, featuring both albums and a further disk of twelve unreleased tracks. Since the original songs have not been remastered, whether this is a fitting celebration largely depends on whether these twelve unreleased tracks deserve inclusion. 

At their core is a pair of quite polished songs. “Follow Me Around” has been knocking about for many years (see the performance by Yorke and Jonny Greenwood in Macerata in 2017, and the earliest version on the 1998 documentary film Meeting People is Easy). “If You Say the Word” came out of the blue, though. Or almost: in Ed O’Brien’s diary entries from September, 1999 he does talk about a song called ‘say the word’, which he says has ‘great drum, bass and vocals’, although he is ‘personally getting a bit anxious over it, as i [sic] can’t find anything that works with it, or rather i have an idea but can’t get the sound right. makes me a bit neurotic’. 

It seems Ed must have eventually got the sound right because these are both album-calibre songs. But you can see why they never made it onto the original releases. “If You Say the Word” features some disquieting ondes Martenot, like several of the band’s more haunting songs from the time, and some equally disquieting lyrics: ‘when you forget how lucky you are, buried in rubble, sixty foot down’. Nevertheless, it’s a little too calm and contemplative to belong fully alongside riled-up Amnesiac tracks like “Packt Like Sardines In a Crushd Tin Box” and “Knives Out”. WhereasAmnesiac is claustrophobic, “If You Say the Word” is airy and spacy. Almost uplifting. Too much so to be on an album whose cover features a crying Minotaur.

“Follow Me Around” is a good example of Radiohead refusing to release a song until the ‘right’ moment (sometimes, in my view, many years too late when things have moved on, cf. “Lift”). But it’s better late than never on this occasion. The main difference between this version and the live performances is that Yorke’s voice is partly fed through a computer, in true Kid A style, though only to the degree that it sounds like he has an artificial voice shadowing his real one. I thought this a little odd at first listen, but it’s grown on me; his voice is quite literally followed around. Yorke sings ‘I see you in the dark…Comin’ after me, yeah, headlights on full-beam, comin’ down the fast lane’, and thus continues his important tradition of motoring-themed lyrics and song titles (see “Killer Cars”, “Airbag”, “Stupid Car” and “Traffic”).

The accompanying video for “Follow Me Around” unfortunately doesn’t achieve much that wasn’t done already in the 2017 “Man of War” video, featuring another man running from a faceless, frightening force. The video for “If You Say the Word” is quite humorous by Radiohead standards. In absurdist fashion, ‘wild’ city workers are captured from a state of nature and brought to the City, a tamed, closed environment where they live a sanitised working existence.  

The other ten tracks are a mixed bag, but there are flashes of brilliance throughout, and it is noticeable how well the songs are sequenced and blended. It sounds much more like a concept album designed from the start as a seamless succession than a collection of odds and ends assembled 20 years later. “Like Spinning Plates – ‘Why Us’ Version” opens the disk. It is similar to the piano-based live version released on 2001’s I Might Be Wrong, but has a curious (probably early) alternative vocal melody, and a stunningly ethereal outro. This certainly has a claim to being the best version of the song. “Untitled v1” is a spooky, uncertain ambient interlude that flows serenely into “Fog – Again Again Version”, which pitter-patters cheerfully before Yorke’s fragile, melancholy vocals arrive. He proceeds to make you feel strangely wistful about ‘baby alligators in the sewer’ who ‘grow up fast’. 

Then come the two polished songs already discussed, followed by “Pulk/Pull – True Love Waits version”. This song’s title sounds preposterous. How, I wondered, could the sparse electronic moodiness of “Pulk/Pull Revolving Doors” and the anthemic “True Love Waits” come together? Surprisingly they do so rather well, becoming a relaxed but purposeful version of “True Love Waits”. This adds a third (album) instalment of the song, following the live acoustic version in 2001 and the subdued closer of A Moon Shaped Pool. It’s a combination I didn’t know I wanted, but it works. I also find it funny that “Pulk/Pull Revolving Doors” might possibly have never come about without “True Love Waits” needing a backing track.

The ambient “Untitled v2”, which has shadows of “Pulk/PullRevolving Doors”, leads into “The Morning Bell – In the Dark Version”, the third version of the song in as many disks. This is rather plodding and doesn’t add much to the other versions. “Pyramid Strings” is also underwhelming, albeit menacing. The more determined drums of “Alt. Fast Track” then kick in, which feels like you’ve just fallen into a Bourne film. It’s only a sketch of a song, but it’s quite compelling. A shame it isn’t longer, though. “Untitled v3”, which recalls the harp at the end of “Motion Picture Soundtrack”, melds into “How to Disappear into Strings”. This is a sinister and cinematic end to the disk, reducing the Kid A song to its bare orchestral essence, and forming an organic and satisfying closer.

In the book accompaniment to the re-issue Kid A Mnesia Yorke describes how after OK Computer ‘There was this fierce desire to be totally on the outside of everything that was going on, and a fierce anger, and suspicion. And that permeated everything’, and how when making Kid A he would ‘be going off on one in all directions, flailing around, experimenting with lots of different things’. From this period of clearly intense and repetitive creative struggle emerged an engaging, challenging and frequently intoxicating body of work. There was no need to put Kid A Mnesia together. But the additional disk is more than worth having for those who enjoy this Radiohead era. 

Image: Nicholas Lœuillet// CC BY-SA 2.0 via Flickr

Professor Stephen Blythe announced as new Principal of LMH

0

Harvard Professor Stephen Blythe has been announced as the new Principal of Lady Margaret Hall, starting in Michaelmas Term 2022.

In a statement released by LMH, Blythe said that “I am honoured to have been elected by the Governing Body as the next Principal and am delighted to be joining LMH. I look forward to working together with the Fellowship to support, strengthen and champion the pioneering academic mission of the college.

“I admire LMH’s bold initiatives in recent years and its achievements in diversifying access to an Oxford education. Founded with the goal of opening education and career opportunities to the previously excluded, LMH is a distinctive academic community which transforms lives and tackles pressing challenges facing higher education.”

Professor Blythe is currently a Harvard Professor of the Practice of Statistics. As an undergraduate, he studied Mathematics at Cambridge’s Christ College, where he was 3rd Senior Wrangler. He also holds a PhD in statistics from Harvard University. After graduating, he taught as a lecturer in Mathematics at Imperial College London, before transitioning to roles in finance. 

Having held positions as Managing Director of both Morgan Stanley New York and Deutsche Bank London, in 2006 he returned to Harvard, taking a leadership role at the Harvard Management Company (HMC). HMC is responsible for the management of the University’s endowment of approximately £30 billion, which is the world’s largest. In 2014 he was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer of HMC, while continuing to teach in his capacity as Professor of the Practice of Statistics.  

In their statement, LMH emphasised that “As endowment chief, professor and alumni leader, [Blythe] has been committed to reducing barriers to higher education, increasing access and developing academic talent regardless of background.”

Blythe will replace the current interim Principal, Professor Christine Gerrard.  

Image Credit: Herbi1922 / CC BY-SA 4.0

Reshuffling our thoughts

0

A shock decision by Spotify has fundamentally shaped the concept of the album in the digital age. Adele’s new album, 30, can no longer be shuffled as the streaming giant followed the artist’s conviction for her album to be heard as a cohesive, narrative whole. Whilst the loss of a small button may seem inconsequential to many, it alters how we conceptualise the album in an increasingly disparate musical age. 

Arguably many of the 20th and 21st century’s finest albums act as a muscial entity, rather than a collection of disparate songs. Adele’s 30 follows an explanatory narrative as she follows her divorce. The singer says her album, amongst others, “tells a story and our stories should be listened to as we intended.” Yet Adele is not the first to use her album to express a narrative. Bruno Mars’ and Silk Sonic’s recent album, An Evening With Silk Sonic, uses funk inspiration which is novel in comparison to the poppy tone of Mars’ oeuvre. The funk-king Bootsy Collins announces the work in “Silk Sonic Intro” which makes the album appear as a recording of a live performance, conceptualised as a narrative whole, situated in time,.

The structure of An Evening With Silk Sonic and 30 hark back to an age of analogue listening. Music was heard on vinyl, with the needle cutting through tracks in the artist’s intended order. Connections across an album would be recognised by the attentive listener. The Beach Boys’ seminal work, Pet Sounds, translates melodic musical material from “I Know There’s An Answer” into “Hang On To Your Ego” which provides reflective threads on the previous angst within the album’s narrative and compliments the contemporaneous technology it would be played on.

Music-playing technology fundamentally has changed our concept of the album and its narrative. Streaming allows us to drag-and-drop our preferred tracks into curatable playlists based on mood or the music’s association in a display of listener agency. Listenership has moved from passively appreciating an artist’s work to reforming it to fit our taste. It is almost as if the album has become a box of chocolates; we pick our favourites and discard the rest. However, the album is not a disposable commodity and is, in most cases, a piece of art with personal to its creator and cultural value to its listener. Do you read a chapter of a novel at random, only to put it down again, or select your favourite objects in a painting? Alas, I thought not.  

The album, like a painting or a book, should be considered as a whole work. Music-disseminating technology devalued the album to pander to listener preferences in a seismic shift of musical authority. Music listening is now based upon it reception rather than artist intention. Artists release their albums into the public realm and express their innermost artistic creativity through such mediums. Surely we would be doing them a disservice to reorder and cherry-pick the fruits of their labours?

Image Credit: Florencia Viadana

‘To help us survive’: On Stephen Sondheim

0

Right after my GCSEs, as I was gradually exiting a deeply embarrassing Hamilton phase, I saw the 1961 film adaptation of West Side Story. I was at a screening in Spitalfields Market, in an industrial former warehouse – the perfect setting for that film’s gritty vision of New York City. Yet what dragged me into a new stage of musical theatre obsession was not West Side Story’s sweeping approach to filming complex choreography, or its dazzling technicolour aesthetic, but the lyrics of Stephen Sondheim, who passed away last November at the age of 91.

I didn’t know how to articulate this at the time, but watching West Side Story I encountered for the first time a quality I’ve come to look for in great musical theatre: the distillation of complex emotion into song in a rounded yet deceptively simple manner. Here was a prime example of showtunes’ unique ability to bring human feeling to a higher plane, whether that feeling was an immigrant’s anxiety (‘America’) or the immediate processing of first love (both the tense euphoria of ‘Maria’ and the giddiness of ‘I Feel Pretty’). Here, too, were the exhilarating aspects of Sondheim’s lyrics which would become his hallmarks, and which I would come to love: the complex, hyperactive rhythmical structures (‘Something’s Coming’), the patter songs that manage to be both comic and profound (‘Gee, Officer Krupke’), the unexpectedly raw comedown from a soaring chorus (‘We’ll find a new way of living / We’ll find a way of forgiving’).

If Sondheim had retired after West Side Story, his legacy would still have been notable, as a 27-year-old who had written lyrics which complemented and uplifted a domineering score by the more experienced Leonard Bernstein. But there was much more to come. After again contributing lyrics to another composer’s score (Jule Styne’s Gypsy), Sondheim first wrote both lyrics and music for a musical in 1966 with A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Forum. He then spent the next three decades composing a string of shows unprecedented both in their melodic complexity and the themes with which their lyrics dealt, ranging from the ennui of dating in the city, to collective responsibility, to the price of artistic genius.

It would be at this point in the tribute essay that I would reflect on the formative experience of seeing Sweeney Todd or Sunday In The Park With George as a pre-teen, and how that encouraged a lifelong obsession. But as the old adage goes, Sondheim wrote musical theatre ‘for adults’, and I think that until a few years ago I was simply too young for his work; my first encounter with Sondheim was a secondary school production of Into The Woods, and I wish this had immediately triggered a deep fondness for his lyrics, but it would still be a few more years before that fateful West Side Story screening. Pretentious as I was at fourteen, I was too stuck on finding Into The Woods’ fairytale motifs passé, and failed to recognise its poignant message of human responsibility for others in the community, best expressed in the sinister yet beautiful lyrics of ‘No One Is Alone’.

If Sondheim did not exclusively write for adults, then, he at least wrote for those with some experience of life, who could benefit from having the truth of their lives put to them, without any bullshit. It’s been notable in the aftermath of his death how many social media mourners used his pithier lyrics as a form of therapy (‘No One Is Alone’ and ‘Children And Art’ from Sunday have become ubiquitous as expressions of grief for Sondheim himself), and it’s this universal quality that’s made his songs so adaptable when performed in other, completely different media.

In this light, it’s fitting that a watershed moment in my gradual discovery of Sondheim was watching Marriage Story two Christmases ago, in which Adam Driver performs ‘Being Alive’ from Company as a divorced man reeling from the memory of the love described in the song (in stark contrast to Company’s perpetually single Bobby). While the context of previous events in Company’s plot – Bobby’s disillusionment with love thanks to the eccentric married couples in his life – undeniably makes the climax of ‘Being Alive’ richer, even without this context Sondheim’s lyrics are sufficient to convey the song’s message, and were enough to get me instantly hooked. The way ‘Being Alive’ ricochets from dismissal of monogamous love as a waste of time (‘someone to sit in your chair / And ruin your sleep’), to a cathartic acceptance of wanting passionate, complicated love (‘let me be used / vary my days’), to a sort of tenderness amidst the chaos (‘I’ll always be there / As frightened as you / To help us survive’) helped me rationalise as a late teen all the contradictory notions I had about the relationships I wanted, and the lyrics became mantras to which I continually refer. I even took it one step further than personal therapy, and once used ‘Being Alive’ to express how I felt to a former romantic interest – humiliating, but an experience everyone should have with the work of their hero.

Though I believe certain earlier musical theatre lyricists, particularly Sondheim’s mentor Oscar Hammerstein II, don’t always get enough credit for their work’s thematic richness, Sondheim nevertheless turned a corner by being both a lyricist and a composer, allowing his scores as well as his lyrics to reflect his characters’ complex emotions. My emotional response to ‘Send In The Clowns’ from A Little Night Music has varied widely since I first heard it, from frustration and desire for missed romantic opportunities to resolve themselves, to resigned acceptance of things just not working out. I think this emotional turbulence is in part due to Sondheim’s score: the song’s unusual metre and short phrasing give the sense of something unfinished, and Sondheim’s confinement of the vocal line within a fairly narrow range of notes leads the audience to expect a belted climax which never comes, leaving them instead with a resigned, half-whispered ‘Well, maybe next year’. The emotional richness of ‘Send In The Clowns’ stems from its simplicity, and this is also evidence of Sondheim’s respect for actors who sing, as opposed to singers who act – when Glynis Johns originated the role of Desiree in A Little Night Music in 1973, Sondheim prioritised the husky, desperate quality of her voice over undue strain on her vocal range and inability to sustain notes.

So how should we honour Sondheim’s legacy? Firstly, by celebrating his work, through the inevitable revivals next year and the new film version of West Side Story, as well as engaging with parts of the canon which we haven’t yet touched (as a classicist, it’s shameful that I haven’t got around to listening to the Plautus-influenced Forum). Furthermore, the irony is not lost on me that I’m a 21-year-old who loves musicals mostly about people in their thirties or older, so we should be open to the resonance of Sondheim’s lyrics growing and changing as we age; Sunday In The Park With George, and especially its climactic number ‘Move On’, offers a message of encouragement to all who create (even those of us who write theatre criticism!), and the more I write, the more the words ‘Anything you do / Let it come from you / Then it will be new’ serve as comfort. The more relationships and friendships we form, the more Sondheim’s words can resonate. Just as I understood ‘Send In The Clowns’ more after accepting that teenage relationships don’t always last, I hope that Company will help me navigate the woes of third-wheeling and feeling stuck as one’s friends evolve, and that Merrily We Roll Along will provide a blueprint if and when cracks show in my idealistic university friendships (it was the perfect Sondheim to have seen in my first term at Oxford for this reason).

But what do I know? Since Sondheim once referred to theatre critics as ‘ignoramuses’ and had a famous disdain towards their appraisal of his work, perhaps the decision about his legacy should be up to him. The answer to how Sondheim would’ve wanted to be remembered may lie in his commitment to mentoring the next generation, expressed most poignantly in an email to Lin-Manuel Miranda in which he wrote of ‘repaying what I owe Oscar [Hammerstein]’. Not only was Sondheim’s mentorship instrumental in the development of titans like Miranda, Jonathan Larson (a process fictionalised in the recently filmed autobiographical musical Tick, Tick, Boom), and Jason Robert Brown, but he also imparted wisdom and encouragement, replying to thousands of letters with aphorisms as simple yet profound as his lyrics, letters which are now documented on the wonderful Instagram account @sondheimletters. Therefore, Sondheim’s legacy may lie in the writers whom he inspired, and we might honour him by seeing an original piece of musical theatre writing next season: one unhampered by desire for commercial success and concerned with expressing its writer’s individual voice, just like Sondheim’s work did forty years ago.

Thank you, Stephen Sondheim. May your memory be a blessing, and may we remember that – in the words of the Baker’s Wife from Into The Woods – ‘no one leaves for good’. 

Image Credit: Tantó / CC BY-SA 4.0