Saturday, April 26, 2025
Blog Page 340

Fun Home?

CW: sexual assault, child abuse, suicide, homophobia.

2015 was a great year in the history of musical theatre, possibly the greatest year of this century for the genre. Why, you ask? Because that was the year that Fun Home first opened on Broadway. (Oh, and a little thing called Hamilton opened that year too).

As much as I love Hamilton, there is a part of me that feels that Fun Home achieves something that Lin Manuel Miranda’s magnum opus never quite can. Every time I listen to it, the musical connects with me on the rawest and most visceral level, leaving me both uplifted and emotionally devastated by the end. The musical won five Tony Awards, including ‘best new musical’, so is hardly bereft of critical acclaim. But I want to ask the question of what makes it so great. Does it resonate with me personally because of my own journey with my sexuality, or are its explorations of queer desire and coming out in fact more universal?

The musical, written by Lisa Kron and Jeanine Tesori, is adapted from Alison Bechdel’s 2006 graphic memoir. Indeed, it is the first Broadway musical with a lesbian protagonist. It tells a true story in a non-linear and comic-book-style fashion about Bechdel’s closeted father killing himself due to his sexuality at roughly the same time Bechdel herself came out as gay.

It doesn’t sound like a barrel of laughs, yet the musical’s greatest strength is how it is always able to see the light in the darkness. Songs like ‘Come to the Fun Home’, performed by the child actors in the production, is a comic tour-de-force that cannot help but put a smile on your face. The title itself encapsulates the tonal complexity of the production. ‘Fun Home’ is a euphemism for a funeral parlour, but the show’s creators Jeanine Tesori and List Krone’s never lost sight of the ‘fun’. 

In fact, it does something which happens so infrequently in terms of media representation of gay characters— it portrays coming-out as ultimately a rewarding and positive experience. Shows like Angels in America or the new BBC drama It’s a Sin are brilliant depictions of the AIDS crisis and should be essential viewing for everyone to understand the struggles that the LGBT community went through, don’t get me wrong. On the other end of the spectrum, films like Love, Simon (although a major milestone in terms of major motion pictures including gay characters as protagonists) exploit the coming-out narrative in attempt to artificially add melodrama to an almost non-existent plot. But people who identify as LGBTQIA+ need narratives that show us it does get better. We don’t need to live forever in shame like Bruce (Alison’s father); we will find love and acceptance, and it is often at the points in our lives that we are least expecting to find it. 

The show’s masterpiece of a song, ‘Changing My Major’, best illustrates the point. At this point in the show, Alison has just had her first sexual encounter at college with a woman called Joan; the song begins with witty lyrics such as ‘We don’t need any food / We’ll live on sex alone / Sex with Joan!’ before shifting into a different region altogether: ‘Am I falling into nothingness or flying into something so sublime?’. Indeed, the line is repeated later on in the show in Bruce’s song ‘Edges of the World’, just moments before he steps in front of the truck. While he cannot save himself from ‘falling into nothingness’, it is the imagery of flying that dominates the musical. The show opens with a child Alison flying her toy airplanes around the house and being lifted into the sky balancing on her father’s legs, singing ‘I want to fly airplane’. Alison’s queer identity for her, and indeed the audience, becomes ‘sublime’. She doesn’t sink; she soars.

Fun Home therefore contrasts her dad’s inability to accept himself and his resulting suicide, with Alsion’s coming out experience as something exciting that ultimately gives her a sense of meaning in life. If Bruce hadn’t been so ashamed of himself, life could have got much better for him, just as it does for Alison. Yet Bruce’s shame is not only to do with the fact that he is gay — and it is here where the nuance lies. There is an implication throughout the show that he has sex with underage males. His ‘fall into nothingness’ is a mixture of his guilt about his sexual abuse of minors and his marital infidelity as well as his inability to accept his sexuality. The show doesn’t try to simplify the moral complexities of the issues it deals with. Alison achieves a sense of catharsis through her plunge into her memories. She both learns to forgive her father and sympathise with him, despite all the problematic aspects of his character, and his tendency to bully his daughter— and we, as an audience, are encouraged to do the same. 

The most upsetting part of the show in many ways is the scene in which Bruce forces his daughter (at this point still a child) to wear a dress rather than the trousers she wants to wear to a children’s party. Bruce inflicts all his pent-up years of shame and internalised homophobia onto his daughter. By trying to save her from being teased by other children, he actually damages her emotionally in ways that will take years for Alison to truly realise and process. Internalised homophobia begins far earlier than most realise, at an age where many children don’t even know what being ‘gay’ actually is— all the more reason why LGBT-inclusive curriculums in primary schools are especially important. 

I first listened to the musical at a low point in my own life. Rewind back to May last year, we were all still learning how to cope with the demands of self-isolation. But what was weighing on my mind more was that I was still not out to my family. And I was very lucky: they’ve all been very accepting and supportive of me. Fun Home shows us that all families inevitably have secrets— both parents keeping secrets from their children and children keeping secrets from their parents and, arguably, this is why Fun Home is a universal story. Everyone can see something in Alison’s story, even if they personally don’t have to go through the process of coming out in their lifetime.

Image Credit: Marc Brenner.

University confirms record-low 1 case this week and releases lateral flow results

0

The University has confirmed 1 case of Covid-19 amongst staff and students from Early Alert Service tests from 20th of February to 26th of February, with a positivity rate of 1.9% and 54 tests administered in total. This marks the lowest figures this term for positive test results, tests administered, and positivity rate. 

Cases in Oxford have also been decreasing. From the 22nd of February to the 28th of February, 123 people tested positive for Covid-19 in the city, according to UK government data. This marks a 24.5% decrease in cases from the last 7 days reported, with a rate of 108.2 cases per 100k people.

The University has also released its results for the Lateral Flow Tests offered to students returning to campus in Hilary (as of 26 February 2021). A total of 3,076 students were recorded as having taken one or more of the lateral flow tests offered and, of these students, 15 tested positive for Covid-19. The University has confirmed that a similar testing scheme will be in place for the start of next term.

Aaron Aguma elected President of Oxford African and Caribbean Society

0

Aaron Aguma has been elected President of Oxford African and Caribbean Society (ACS). He will serve throughout the academic year 2021/22, succeeding the current President, Sean Sinanan. 

Aguma is a first-year student studying Classics at St. John’s College and is currently one of the society’s junior access and outreach officers. Following his election, Aguma has stated that he is “really happy about it [his election victory]” and that he is “excited to  help the society in any way [he] can as President”.

Votes were cast by members of the ACS after the society’s first ever virtual hustings held over Zoom on February 19th 2021. The hustings lasted almost three hours during which campaign videos created by the candidates were screened and candidates explained the aims stated in their manifestos. 

Throughout the hustings candidates also responded to questions from members of the audience, including questions posed by the President for the 2020/21 academic year, Sean Sinanan, and President for the 2019/20 academic year, Christopher Willis. 

Candidates also discussed issues such as their proposed strategies for the tackling of racism within the university, constitutional reforms necessary within the society and their personal motivations behind running for president.

Aguma’s manifesto focuses on increasing access work and promoting unification among current members and alumni of the society; particularly through the introduction of an event named ‘ACS Family Reunion’, which seeks to connect alumni and current ACS members via an annual networking event.

Building on his manifesto aims, Aguma told Cherwell that throughout his presidency he intends to “empower and unify the society in all its forms: prospective, present and past”.

Oxford ACS is a society for students of African and Caribbean heritage at the University of Oxford. Presidential elections are held annually; the role of president is open to all first-year members and all current members of the society are eligible to vote.

Report says vaccine passports face 12 challenges

0

A report published by the Science in Emergencies Tasking: COVID-19 (SET-C) group at the Royal Society has drawn attention to a series of basic issues that need to be addressed before a vaccine passport system could be introduced.

The SET-C Steering Committee is composed of 13 Professors across top UK universities and is chaired by Professor Peter Bruce FRS, The Royal Society. 

A primary concern remains that any passport should be able to show if the individual is protected from the virus and will not transmit it. The passport would also need to show vaccine efficacy, international acceptance and if it is effective against new and emerging variants. Finally, it would need to meet legal and ethical standards.

All 12 criteria proposed by the panel are as follows:

  • Meet benchmarks for COVID-19 immunity
  • Accommodate differences between vaccines in their efficacy, and changes in vaccine efficacy against emerging variants
  • Be internationally standardised
  • Have verifiable credentials
  • Have defined uses
  • Be based on a platform of interoperable technologies
  • Be secure for personal data
  • Be portable
  • Be affordable to individuals and governments
  • Meet legal standards
  • Meet ethical standards
  • Have conditions of use that are understood and accepted by the passport holders

Director of the Leverhulme Center for Demographic Science and one of the lead authors of the report, Professor Mills, says, “Understanding what a vaccine passport could be used for is a fundamental question. Is it a passport to allow international travel or could it be used domestically to allow holders greater freedoms?”

Professor Mills further stated, “International standardisation and following the lead of the WHO is one of the criteria we believe essential, but we have already seen some countries introducing vaccine certificates related to travel or linked to quarantine or attending events. We need a broader discussion about multiple aspects of a vaccine passport, from the science of immunity through to data privacy, technical challenges and the ethics and legality of how it might be used.”

Professor Dye, Professor of Epidemiology in Oxford’s Department of Zoology and another lead author, added: “An effective vaccine passport system that would allow the return to pre-COVID-19 activities, including travel, without compromising personal or public health, must meet a set of demanding criteria – but it is feasible.”

Professor Dye continued that “huge progress has been made in many of these areas but we are not yet in the best position to use vaccine passports. At the most basic level, we are still gathering data on exactly how effective each vaccine is in preventing infection and transmission and on how long the immunity will last.”

Image Credit: ZElsb/CC BY-SA 4.0

Oxford LGBTQ+ Society responds to homophobic and racist ‘zoombombing’

0

CW: Homophobia, racism.

After an Oxford LGBTQ+ Society event discussing the realities of being an LGBTQ+ person in the Caribbean was ‘zoombombed’ with homophobic and racist content, the Society has told Cherwell that they intend to report the incident to the police, along with setting up new mechanisms to secure future meetings. Similar attacks have also taken place at the Universities of Edinburgh, Durham and Sussex, along with Manchester Metropolitan University.

The event, co-hosted with Oxford’s African and Caribbean Society, was titled ‘LGBTQ+ History and Lived Experiences in the Caribbean’ and was the third of their four LGBTQ+ History Month events. During the event, a homophobic slur was repeatedly typed in the Zoom chat and a racist slur was written over one speaker’s presentation on the ‘Historical Role of Britain in Criminalising Homosexuality around the World – with focus on the Commonwealth Caribbean’. Those who typed the messages wore ‘V for Vendetta’ masks.

The meeting was closed after these attacks. When the meeting was restarted, chat, annotation, whiteboard and microphone permissions were removed from all guests. The individuals who had posted in the chat attempted to re-join; one was successful but was then quickly removed. The rest of the event continued without disturbance.

The Oxford LGBTQ+ Society told Cherwell: “Moving forward from the events of Thursday night, both the Equality & Diversity Unit and the IT Department are going to be working with us to help protect vital safe spaces for students of all identities throughout the University and to prevent this from ever happening again. We are keen for this initiative to extend to universities across the UK, as this is clearly not an isolated incident and such ‘Zoom-bombings’ are increasing in frequency, especially within University settings.

“We intend to report this hate crime to the police and have been offered the support of the Proctors’ Office in navigating this process. We have also reached out to Edinburgh University ACS, who unfortunately experienced a strikingly similar attack at their ‘Pro-Black and Anti-Gay?’ event last week. These attacks were organised and targeted, and we suspect they were orchestrated by the same group of people, and as such we are keen to collaborate and communicate as we seek to hold those responsible to account.”

These attacks follow an incident at the University of Edinburgh on 14th February, where racist and homophobic messages were sent in the Zoom chat while attackers shouted “white power” and played pornography, reducing one guest speaker to tears. In an Instagram statement, the UoE African Caribbean Society said: “We strongly condemn their actions and this attack only proved the necessity of these discussions. We maintain a zero-tolerance on any form of discrimination and this was a horrible occurrence that should never be repeated. This crime will be reported to higher authorities and action will be taken.”

Jason Jones – a gay activist from Trinidad and Tobago – was a speaker at both the Edinburgh and the Oxford events. Reflecting upon these attacks in the restarted meeting, he said: “When the attack happened on February 14 at the Edinburgh event, it sent me into a very dark space. As an older LGBT person of colour, it took me back to years of the most horrendous homophobic attacks I have lived through. I did the first public gay drag show in Trinidad and Tobago in 1992 and my family made me homeless. I ended up homeless just for doing a drag show, but now everyone looks at RuPaul’s Drag Race and thinks that it’s okay. When I saw what happened tonight it sent me back to those very dark days when there was no support, when there was no idea of us being human beings”.

He continued: “The fact we were attacked again tonight by the racist homophobes after being attacked at two other universities over the last 6 months shows that universities are not engaging with the dialogue. That is because the leadership are all white, cisgender and all predominantly straight and middle class. These are people who do not face the challenges that minorities face. We need to take this to the highest level to ensure they are listening to us.”

At a quiz hosted by Manchester Metropolitan University’s LGBTQ+ Society this week, between seven and ten trolls allegedly interrupted the Zoom call with homophobic remarks. The Society’s President told the Tab that they also made “some really nasty comments” about people’s disabilities, weight, and “lewd comments” about different sexualities. An October event held by University of Sussex’s DragSoc also faced homophobic and transphobic abuse from anonymous attendees. At an event hosted by the St Mary’s LGBT+ Association at Durham University, between fifteen and twenty anonymous callers shouted homophobic and racist slurs, along with sharing sexually explicit videos. The Association said: “The participants of this call were left feeling upset, threatened and above all, unsafe.”

Speaking about a general rise in attacks upon Zoom events, Patrik Hermansson of the anti-racism group Hope Not Hate told BBC News that the group had seen a “rise” in attacks on Zoom events. “We see invite links to meetings being shared by far-right accounts on social media and in chat rooms,” he continued, “and people are urged to join and disrupt or spread hate.”

Stonewall’s Head of Media Jeffrey Ingold said: “It’s vital that tech platforms and universities work together to improve online safety measures and deal with all incidents seriously and swiftly to make clear that anti-LGBT+ and racist abuse online will not be tolerated.”

In a statement published on their Facebook page immediately after the event, the Oxford LGBTQ+ Society stated: “Tonight, our LGBTQ+ History and Lived Experiences in the Caribbean event was targeted by homophobic and racist attendants who attempted to sabotage and silence our speakers. Unfortunately, this was not an isolated incident and Jason Jones, one of our panellists, experienced similar attacks at a University of Edinburgh event last week, highlighting how bigotry is still prevalent and proud, and can seep into university spaces. To prevent these malicious individuals from being able to further disrupt our panel, we restarted our event with extra precautions and proceeded to have an important and powerful discussion surrounding Britain’s role in anti-gay legislation and the history of LGBTQ+ rights in the Caribbean, as well as the current climate towards LGBTQ+ people in the region. We strongly encourage everybody to take the time to watch the recorded version of our panel, which will be uploaded in due course and linked here later.

“We want to thank our incredible panellists, Billie Bryan, Jason Jones and Kaisha Ince, who continued on in the face of hatred, and all those within the Oxford Community who positively engaged with our event. We will not be silenced by hate and we stand in solidarity with our LGBTQ+ siblings in the Caribbean and beyond, who face such targeted hatred and violence on a day-to-day basis. We are stronger together, and as Jason most powerfully said tonight, hate is intersectional and so our liberation must be intersectional too.

“For all those that have been negatively affected by this, please reach out to one of our Welfare Representatives, Fran (she/her) at [email protected] or Lewis (they/them) at [email protected], or alternatively contact the Student Welfare Support Service who have been alerted to what has happened and are on hand to offer support to those who need it.

“If you are able, please donate to our fundraiser for Colours Cayman, a locally registered and operated non-profit that aims to foster a safe environment for the Cayman and wider Caribbean LGBTQ+ community. Tonight’s panel has demonstrated the critical need for such non-profits within otherwise hostile places, and we invite you to support their endeavour towards equality.”

For confidential advice and support, you can contact Switchboard at 0300 330 0630, 10am to 10pm, every day, or email them at [email protected]. All phone operators are LGBTQ+.

Image Credit: Ludovic Bertron. License: CC BY 2.0.

Vacant Nuffield College accommodation used to house homeless people

0

Sixteen homeless people have recently been offered homes in properties owned by Nuffield College. These residents will be housed in the college’s Becket Street accommodation for the next two years.

The properties, having been empty for 18 months, have been revamped to provide housing in which residents can have a “sense of ownership”.  Project architect Katie Reilly of Transition by Design explained, for example, that unlike in many rental accommodations, residents can have the autonomy to paint their own bedrooms. 

Nuffield College has been working with homeless charity Aspire Oxford in the scheme, aiming to provide housing that will remain affordable even after residents find jobs. Aspire had previously forged a working relationship with the college after participating in a study into homelessness carried out by Nuffield’s Centre for Social Investigation. 

Nuffield College told Cherwell: “We were very pleased to support Aspire Oxford’s Becket St Project by enabling some of the College’s unused properties to be used and improved by them on a temporary basis while we think about and put in place plans for their longer-term future.”

“The properties on Becket Street became vacant in late 2019 and we are glad to have been able to make them available for purposes which will bring tangible benefits to the local community. This aligns with the College’s objectives as a social science research institution which seeks not only to build bridges between the academic and public worlds, but also to contribute to the cultural, social, and economic life of the city of Oxford,” they added.

Additionally Paul Roberts, CEO of Aspire Oxford, said that Aspire is working to give the residents “access to engage with our education, training, employment development programs, helping them build up their own personal funds to be able to afford a deposit and to start putting rent payments down and to get into work.”

Apart from this collaboration with Nuffield College, Aspire has also worked alongside Wadham College, University College, and Christ Church in refurbishing properties for new purposes.

Image: Islip Flyer. Attribution 2.0 Generic (CC BY 2.0)

Somerville College to divest from fossil fuels

0

Somerville College has committed to fully divesting from fossil fuels by July 2021. The update on their website stated that Somerville has already divested from £400,000 of investments in coal, and from a “significant proportion of our holdings in oil and gas companies”. Their plan is to “re-invest this income in new green investments.”

This forms part of a wider series of initiatives as well as a Sustainability Working Group that is comprised of representatives from Somerville including undergraduates, postgraduates, academics, and support staff who are going to be working towards helping Somerville become a “carbon-neutral college as fast as possible, but by 2050 at the very latest”. 

Somerville’s new College Climate Change Champion, Professore Renier van der Hoorn, will chair the efforts of this group. 

They are also making changes to lighting, heating, managing waste, food and biodiversity across the college – from replacing the lights that expire with efficient LEDs to implementing a comprehensive waste management strategy. 

Finally, Somerville outlined how it will continue to support climate change research including hosting a conference looking at the development of sustainable agriculture in partnership with UPL in September.

The Oxford University Climate Justice Campaign responded to the news, saying: “We are incredibly pleased to mark the Fossil Free National Day of Action by announcing that, after years of campaigning, Somerville College has committed to fully divest their
endowment fund, worth just shy of £100 million, from fossil fuels by July 2021 and re-invest the income in new green investments! They have also announced that the College will aim to be carbon neutral as fast as possible, and by 2050 at the latest.

“Today’s National Day of Action theme is Solidarity Across Borders. Divesting is the greatest statement Somerville can make to show its solidarity with frontline communities and Indigenous Peoples who are suffering the worst of the climate crisis. We are pleased to note that Somerville offers scholarships to refugee students. But as forced climate migrancy becomes increasingly unavoidable, it would have been hypocritical for Somerville to offer these scholarships while still invested in fossil fuel companies. We are delighted that Somerville’s stance is now more consistent and holistic. Climate justice cannot be separated from migrant justice.

“This announcement follows other divestment announcements this week from Cambridge including from Pembroke College Cambridge and Trinity College Cambridge. People power is turning the tide against the fossil fuel industry. But too many Oxford colleges, such as St John’s, are still investing millions in the fossil fuel industry, risking our shared future. We won’t stop campaigning until every college has committed to divest.”

Image Credit: Philip Allfrey/CC BY-SA 3.0

University responds to latest government announcement

0

The University of Oxford has confirmed their plans for Trinity term, following an announcement from the government which would allow students to return after the Easter break.

Teaching will take place online and in-person, with the start date of in-person teaching differing across courses. For undergraduates, a small number of students will have ‘catch-up teaching’ in Week -1. For most courses allowed to return, especially science subjects including practical elements, in-person teaching will begin from Week 1 on April 26th.

The University will not be able to confirm dates for students on non-practical courses until the government releases further guidance around Easter. Postgraduate research students are not affected by the government’s announcement and can continue to conduct research on-site.

Residency requirements will not be in place for Trinity term. However, the University still encourages students to return to Oxford. Since government guidance allows students to return from March 8th, which falls at the end of Hilary term, some taught students may also be able to return from that date to access facilities such as libraries – if they meet certain criteria.  This will be from March 8th for taught postgraduates, and April 12th for undergraduates. Communication from the University stated: “In line with Government guidance, as well as returning for in-person teaching, you may also be permitted to come back to Oxford if you need access to facilities such as libraries and study space. These needs are likely to be particularly acute if you are nearing the completion of your degree, with important submissions and final assessments in the next term. Therefore, taught postgraduates in their final year, including those on one-year Masters programmes, may be able to return from 8 March; and undergraduate finalists may be able to return from 12 April.”

Colleges may allow individual students to return before their course begins in-person teaching for welfare reasons.

International students will be “supported to return in time to take part in in-person teaching where necessary”. Students from countries on the government’s ‘red list’, such as Brazil and Portugal, are advised not to return “unless you have substantial in-person teaching commitments”. Colleges will not be able to routinely cover the costs of quarantining for students from ‘red list’ countries who do return, which currently costs £1,750.

International students who have not travelled from ‘red list’ countries will have to isolate in their college for ten days on arrival. Students must agree this with their college in advance.

All students will be “expected” to take a lateral flow test upon arrival at the University, and another three days later. Students “should not take part in in-person teaching” until they have report two negative test results.

Once in Oxford, students will be expected to abide by the Student Responsibility Agreement, even if they have already had COVID or have been vaccinated. Although some restrictions will be eased over the course of Trinity term, the email warns “here will continue to be significant restrictions on what we can and cannot do for some time”.

Responding to the latest announcement from the University, the Oxford SU released a statement, saying: “We welcome the University communication to you today and we encourage you to read it carefully. We are pleased to see the University have outlined the expected timeline for return to Oxford for postgraduate taught and undergraduate finalists, remember to confirm you plans with your college before planning your travel. We continue to work with the collegiate university to develop plans for the return of students in line with government guidance”.

It continued: “The University’s website has also been updated with new information including around returning to Oxford and support provided. We would like to highlight that whilst the university and colleges will not routinely cover travel costs, ‘in some instances where the costs of testing or quarantine are a contributory factor in student hardship, it may be possible for some support to be provided from the University’s COVID- 19 Hardship Fund.’ 

“Over the past few days and weeks, we have spent hundreds of hours and 50+ meetings lobbying the University and colleges on key issues affecting students. We would like to thank staff across the collegiate University for working with Oxford SU to ensure student views and voices are at the heart of decision-making…  

“We know this remains an incredibly tough time for students and we stand in solidarity with you. We understand your frustrations following the recent government announcement. We remain committed to working with the collegiate University to secure the best university experience for you. We are working with the University’s student experience group and partners across the colleges to put in place plans for Trinity Term including sport, drama and social opportunities.”

Students are advised to wait for further information from their colleges and departments. The latest updates from the University can be found here.

6/03/21, 12:33 – “Postgraduate students are not affected by the government’s announcement and can continue to conduct research on-site” was updated to “Postgraduate research students are not affected by the government’s announcement and can continue to conduct research on-site”.

Professor Christine Gerrard announced as LMH interim Principal

0

Professor Christine Gerrard, current Vice-Principal of Lady Margaret Hall, will act as interim Principal once Alan Rusbridger steps down at the end of September 2021.

Professor Gerrard will hold the position from October 1st 2021 until September 2022. Dr Fiona Spensley will act as Vice-Principal while the election for the next Principal is held.

Professor Gerrard’s main area of research are political literature and women’s writing in the eighteenth century. She teaches period papers covering literature written between 1550-1830, and has a teaching interest in American literature from 1680-1900.

In an email sent to LMH students, Rusbridger said “She [Professor Gerrard] embodies the values of the College and will continue to further establish LMH’s reputation for academic excellence, diversity and inclusion. She and I will be working closely to ensure a seamless transition when I leave.”

Alan Rusbridger became Principal in 2015 after stepping down as Editor-in-Chief at The Guardian.

As Principal of LHM, he implemented a fully-funded Foundation Year scheme aimed at supporting applicants from under-represented groups. He told Cherwell that its establishment was the part of his principalship he was most proud of.

Mr Rusbridger told Cherwell: “I hope LMH has a clearer identity as a welcoming and inclusive college. That was, of course, how it began – as a college to include people who had been excluded from an Oxford education. 140 years on, admitting women to Oxford no longer seems a very radical idea – but it was strongly resisted at the time. It feels as if we are now having the same argument over admitting candidates from under-represented backgrounds.

“Prof Gerrard has spent most of her academic life at LMH and the College will be in very safe hands.  I hope that my successors, like my predecessors continue to stay true to the LMH ethos of righting wrongs and including the previously excluded.”

Professor Gerrard told Cherwell: “My immediate priority is helping LMH students and staff to return to normality after a challenging and difficult year of Covid-19.  I’m looking forward to getting everyone back on site as soon as permitted, and enjoying all the brilliant teaching and the special social and physical facilities that LMH has to offer.

“I will remain committed to ensuring that LMH pursues its goals of academic excellence, inclusion and diversity. We will be continuing LMH’s Foundation Year pioneered under Alan Rusbridger’s tenure. 

“LMH has been fortunate to enjoy a period of strong and visionary leadership and we will be looking to build upon Alan’s achievements.”

New College begins trial of ‘friendship households’ initiative

0

New College are trialling a new household system whereby students are grouped in households of between 6 and 7 people, based on their group of friends rather than the location that they are living in within the College. 

The household groups are now based on “who people are friends with and who they would usually spend time with, rather than who they live near on site.” Each student involved has been issued a household card by the JCR, detailing their household number and household members, that they will be required to keep with them while on-site to be checked by Porters and the decanal team. The trial is currently planned to run over the next 2 weeks, until the end of Hilary term.

The trial was initially proposed by the New College JCR as a welfare initiative, which surveyed the students current living on college about their preferred household arrangement. The data from the survey found that nearly 90% of participants would prefer a friendship-based household system. Isobel Cook, JCR President at New College, told Cherwell that “the structure of our on-site accommodation is such that there were very few problems with shared bathrooms or kitchens, but where these did arise they were easily dealt with by the JCR Committee.” She continued: “Mental health is undoubtedly one of the most pressing issues faced by students today. This new system is a fantastic opportunity to bolster student wellbeing, whilst also reducing the risk of Covid through better rule compliance.”

A spokesperson for New College told Cherwell: “The aim of this new model is to ensure that students are able to spend time with their friends and access their established support systems, whilst also reducing the risk of Covid in College. Research conducted by the JCR showed that an overwhelming majority of students have said they will be more likely to comply with Covid rules in this new system.” 

“Many of the students living in College at the moment are here on the basis of mental health exemptions, and have expressed that this new system will positively impact both their wellbeing and their ability to carry out their academic studies.”

Image: Simononly. License: CC-BY-2.0.