Sunday 29th June 2025
Blog Page 383

Oxford scientists prepare to edit vaccine to combat new variants

0

Scientists from the University of Oxford are preparing to produce new versions of the vaccine they developed with AstraZeneca in order to combat new variants of the coronavirus.

The emergence of variants of the SARS-Cov-2 virus, which causes COVID-19, has led to concerns about whether existing vaccines would be effective at producing herd immunity in the population. Initial laboratory tests indicate that the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine is effective against the B117 variant which emerged in Kent. However, there are concerns that variants which emerged in Brazil and South Africa may be resistant to the vaccines being rolled out worldwide.

Each time a virus infects a cell to produce copies of itself, there is a chance that errors occur in the copying process which produces the genetic material for new viruses. These errors are genetic mutations. According to Dr Amesh A. Adalja from Johns Hopkins University, a new variant is a “version of the virus that has accumulated enough mutations to represent a separate branch on the family tree”.

Most mutations have no effect. However, mutations which occur in the sections of genetic code which determine the structure of spike proteins on the virus’ surface can be hugely consequential. In order to combat a viral infection, specialised white blood cells called B-cells produce antibodies which are complimentary to the structure of the viral spike protein. These antibodies provide immunological memory, helping to fight future infection by this type of virus. If someone is then infected with a variant of that virus with altered spike proteins, their immunological memory will not recognise the new variant.

The Oxford, Moderna and Pfizer vaccines all work by introducing strands of viral mRNA into the cells of a person who receives an injection. That mRNA is then translated by the cell to produce SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins. The body’s immune system then produces antibodies which are complimentary to these spike proteins, which provide immunity against future infection.

Sir John Bell, Regius Professor of Medicine at Oxford, has expressed confidence that the Oxford vaccine can be quickly edited to provide immunity against new variants. This would involve editing the sequence of genetic material which make up the mRNA strands used in COVID vaccines.

The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) is in talks with the independent Commission on Human Medicines to determine how modified COVID-19 vaccines should be regulated. Sir Bell suggested that modified vaccines would only need to be tested on a small sample size to ensure that they were effective, instead of the thousands involved in the development of the first vaccine.

A spokesperson for MHRA told The Guardian: “We can say at this stage that it is unlikely that a full new approval process will be needed,” indicating that a modified vaccine could be approved for use quickly. However, they emphasised that “No vaccine will be authorised for supply in the UK unless the expected standards of safety, quality and effectiveness are met.”

Image: Steven Cornfield via unsplash.com

Covid-19 case numbers continue to drop in Oxfordshire

0

Oxfordshire has seen a decrease in new coronavirus cases in the week ending January 20th as compared to the previous week.  This is consistent with the county’s overall downwards trend in new cases following the stay-at-home order.

Case numbers per 100 000 people by local authority are as follows, with statistics from the week prior in brackets:

Oxford – 451.3 (down from 543.8)

Cherwell – 451.8 (down from 572.7)

Vale of White Horse – 259.5 (down from 297.0)

South Oxfordshire – 245.0 (down from 318.2)

West Oxfordshire – 185.3 (down from 306.4)

The national average is 420.2 (down from 523.4).

The total number of cases in Oxfordshire in the week ending January 20th was 2274 with a rolling rate of 328.8.  This constitutes a total decrease of 608 cases or -21.1% compared to the previous week.

The Oxfordshire case rate remains above the national average but the margin has decreased substantially since the last report.

Oxford SU respond to exam policy changes

0

Oxford SU have released a statement responding to the University’s new exams policy, announced last Friday. The SU has been running an ongoing campaign for students taking exams this academic year. 

The ‘Fair Outcomes for Students’ campaign is focused both on individual and cohort-level challenges. Some of the key policies advocated for by the campaign include rescaling cohort marks if cohort performance is lower than pre-pandemic years, reweighting examined components where appropriate, and an enhanced mitigating circumstances process. The SU are also advocating for mitigating circumstances procedures put in place this year to be extended to all students who have matriculated by MT20. 

The University’s new exams policies take up some of these suggestions, including a rescaling policy and new mitigating circumstances procedures. In the SU’s response, they highlighted some of these campaign wins, but also pushed for an expansion of the University’s current response to include more policy changes on a course-by-course basis.

The Sabbatical Officer team at the SU said: “We will continue to lobby for a more robust, transparent, and expanded mitigating circumstances process, including pushing for mitigating circumstances to affect outcome marks, not just classifications. Additionally, we welcome the University’s announcement of allowing for the inclusion of ‘explanatory statements’ for submissions affected by access to resources, which will be utilised during the marking phase.”

“We will lobby to ensure that this is implemented as broadly as possible, not just as a mitigation for coursework submissions, but also for exams. We believe exams are similarly affected by the ongoing difficulties of resource access for students.”

INEOS’ £100m donation to University criticised by climate groups

0

Climate activists are concerned about “greenwashing” as Oxford University accepts a £100m donation from petrochemicals company Ineos, in order to build a new research institute to fight antimicrobial resistance. 

The University published a statement on January 19th detailing its plans for the Ineos Oxford Institute for AMR research (IOI), which it states will research bacterial resistance and design new antimicrobial drugs. Its main aim is to tackle antimicrobial resistance, caused by overuse and misuse of antibiotics, which it states “is arguably the greatest economic and healthcare challenge facing the world post-Covid.”

However, there are concerns that in accepting the donation from INEOS, Oxford University is helping ‘clear’ the company’s name, as it is increasingly scrutinised in terms of its impact upon the climate. INEOS is one of the world’s largest manufacturers of chemicals and oil products, including the production of solvents, biofuels, plastics, synthetic oils and insulation materials. 

A statement from the Oxford Climate Justice Campaign (OCJC), seen by Cherwell, states: “Though the benefits of these research facilities cannot be denied, this is a clear example of greenwashing: INEOS is an environmentally damaging organisation, involved in drilling and petrochemical production, but thanks to this donation it can parade an ethical donation front.”

The statement continues: “Investing in wholly unrelated fields is not new to INEOS: the British-owned chemical giant owns the former Tour de France Group Sky and funded Eliud Chipchoge’s successful attempt to beat the 2 hour marathon. This donation is part of a strategy aimed at distracting from their appalling environmental and ethical record.” 

A spokesperson from Oxford University told Cherwell: “As with all donations to the University, INEOS has been approved by our rigorous due diligence procedures which consider ethical, legal, financial and reputational issues. All decisions about funding are made by the University’s Committee to Review Donations. These decisions are made in confidence and on their own merits and without consideration of, or reference to, any other University donors or any outside party.”

report published last year revealed that Ineos’ manufacturing plant in Grangemouth, Scotland was by far the nation’s largest polluter. Moreover, Ineos’ CEO Sir Jim Ratcliffe is a vocal critic of the UK government’s anti-fracking legislation. Earlier last year, he said: “The government’s position is unworkable and unhelpful… We have a non-existent energy strategy and are heading towards an energy crisis that will do long-term and irreparable damage to the economy and the government needs to decide whether they are finally going to put the country first and develop a workable UK onshore gas industry.”

A spokesperson from Ineos told Cherwell: “On the Grangemouth emission claim, the site is energy intensive and is, by far, Scotland’s largest manufacturing site.  It represents 4% of Scottish GDP so the claim that it has the highest emissions in Scotland is related entirely to the fact that it is Scotland’s largest manufacturing site.” The firm’s response also stated: “INEOS has no fracking activity. The company has licenses in the UK but has never progressed beyond the stage of geological survey and is unlikely to do so given the government moratorium on fracking.” 

This is not the first time that the University has come under scrutiny for accepting donations from controversial donors. These last two years have seen criticism regarding Oxford’s decision to accept a donation from Stephen Schwarzman, CEO and co-founder of Blackstone, an investment firm, to build a new humanities centre. 

An open letter penned by academics and students, published in 2019, stated: “The “Schwarzman Centre” will be built with the proceeds of the exploitation and disenfranchisement of vulnerable people across the world…Recent controversies surrounding donations by the Sackler Family and Jeffrey Epstein have shown how institutions that have ignored the concerns of their members have gone on, deservedly, to suffer significant damage to their reputations. We believe Oxford is leaving itself open to such future damage.”

OCJC’s statement included a reminder that “campaign groups such as Oxford Against Schwarzman and Disarm Oxford, as well as OCJC have long been calling for greater transparency from the University’s Committee to Review Donations and Research Funding.” It continued: “Safely severing financial ties with fossil fuel companies cannot happen overnight, but we believe that with due consultation, thought, effort and prioritisation it can and should happen in the very near future”. 

The University spokesperson told Cherwell: “We have very clear policies when accepting gifts that they should not influence academic freedom or content and this gift is no exception. The agenda for research will be determined by our academics at all times. INEOS will naturally very interested in the research and the changes it can bring about and we will be updating them regularly on progress.”

Image: Paul McIlroy / Petrochemical plant / CC BY-SA 2.0 via Wikimedia Commons

We hae meat and we can eat: Burns Night Banquet

0

Robert Burns: that guy who wrote ‘Auld Lang Syne’. That’s all he was to me before a half-Scot housemate suggested we throw our own Burns Night supper. Now, he’s captured a little piece of my heart – the bit reserved for food, booze, and hootenanny. 

Burns’ legacy has influenced some of literature’s greats, from Steinbeck’s Of Mice and Men to The Proclaimers’ ‘I’m Gonna Be (500 Miles)’. Last Monday, his legacy extended to ceasing the covid continuum in my flat. He inspired the creation of Scottish flags from IKEA bags, impassioned poetry recitals, and an authentic (FaceTimed) address from my flatmate’s kilt-adorned father. Often dubbed one of the greatest Scots in history, Burns’ work overflows with sincerity, Scottish culture, and food – oh, the food!

The centrepiece of any Burns supper is the haggis, the “Great chieftain o’ puddin’ race” Burns’ immortalised in 48 lines in the ‘Address to a Haggis’. By description alone, haggis is hardly something to get excited about – when you hear dinner’s going to be offal stuffed into a sheep’s stomach, your mouth doesn’t exactly start watering. But as soon as you dare take your first bite, the divisive delicacy wins you over. Rookies certainly won’t have experienced meat with texture like it before, but the flavours are familiar and welcoming. Sausage, pepper, and warm herbs greet you, and you find yourself immediately relaxing into it. 

Joining the Burns Night plate are staples that put a nervous haggis first-timer at ease. Neeps and tatties are the comforting starch of swede (trust me) and potatoes, and whisky sauce has a creamy, umami depth reminiscent of Diane sauce. These can be done with a twist and other sides are often added in: My Monday menu consisted of a nod to my household’s Swiss and Scottish heritage with Neeps and Tatties rösti, buttered lemony leeks, haggis, and whisky sauce. The röstis are crispy with hidden swede sweetness. Topped with haggis, whisky sauce, and buttered leeks, one mouthful feels decadent – a squeeze of lemon in the leeks to cut through the richness and you’re on your way to the perfect bite. 

Burns Night offers a rare spark of novelty in a time where days are monotonous at best. There is a bounty of tradition to immerse yourself in, and the more you commit the better the night gets. So pour yourself a wee dram and start practicing your poetry! 

Neeps & Tatties Rösti Recipe

Ingredients (Serves 6)

  • 500g Swede, peeled and grated 
  • 300g floury potatoes (about 5), peeled and grated 
  • 1 tsp thyme
  • 1 tsp salt (to taste)
  • Freshly ground black pepper 
  • Equal parts butter and vegetable oil, for frying 

Method 

  1. Preheat an oven to 180 C/350 F.
  2. In a large bowl mix the grated swede, potatoes, thyme, salt, and pepper together. Place in a cheese cloth (or tea towel) and squeeze out excess water (the drier the better). Tightly pack rösti mixture into balls roughy 4cm in diameter.*
  3. At a high heat, put equal parts butter and vegetable oil into a frying pan, adding enough to cover the entire bottom in a thin layer. Add a rösti ball to the pan and firmly flatten with a wide spatula. Allow to cook about 2 mins or until the bottom is golden-brown, then flip using a spatula (with confidence!). Repeat with all rösti balls. 
  4. Once both sides of the röstis are golden-brown, place on a baking tray and place in the oven for 15-20 minutes, or until cooked through. 

*If preparing ahead of time, fry the röstis and wait until ready to serve to put in the oven. This prevents the starch in the potatoes oxidising and turning them an unappetising grey colour.

Photo by Katie Hollands.

Clamorous Noise: The Music of Everyday Life

Born in 2005, Alma Deutscher has been composing since the age of four: she is that rare breed known as a child prodigy, touted to mystified television audiences quietly envious that they could never hope to be a prodigy, let alone a few years after having learnt to walk. Few things would see adults jealous of a child, though it is easy to see how Deutscher’s innate musical excellence might be an exception. Born to Cambridge graduates Janie and Guy, a literature professor and linguist, Deutscher’s intellect was nurtured from within the family home, after attending a school orientation day and resigning herself to forever resist the apparent boredom of an ordinary education—she has been home-schooled since. Having learnt the piano aged two and violin the year after, she can thank her musical talent for having saved her from show-and-tell. 

Living in Oxford when she was young, some of Deutscher’s earliest musical memories were formed in the city. She would play in her garden with a skipping rope, twirling it around and allowing the melodies to flow forth, before writing them down in her notebook—later providing useful material for her first studio album, titled—straightforwardly—From My Book of Melodies. ‘When you’re a young child, everything is a game. And music was a game for me—a wonderful game. As I grow up, it becomes more serious.’ Countless interviewers have asked Deutscher self-same questions, endeared curiously at the talented little girl… I wonder if all the adult awe became a little dull. Or patronising. But Deutscher is truly remarkable: aged five, she completed her first piano sonata; at seven, she wrote her first short opera; at nine she wrote a concerto for violin and orchestra, and a full-length opera at twelve. Winner of the European Culture Prize (2019), Deutscher is certain to join the musical greats of the coming decades, perhaps familiar of a young Daniel Barenboim (the child prodigy pianist and conductor born in 1942). 

I’m curious whether this Basingstoke-born Mozart incarnate wanted to shake the patronage and assert herself as a consequential composer, her age irrelevant to the quality of her music. Has Deutscher’s widening perception of humanity affected the tone and meaning of her compositions? She says it’s too soon to say. ‘Maybe if you ask me in ten years’ time, I’ll have a better answer.’ One must remember she is still just a teenager—she’ll turn sixteen in February. Though listen to her music and your ears might tell you otherwise.

If anything asserts Deutscher’s transition from child to professional composer, it is her Siren Waltz, performed to a sold-out Carnegie Hall in 2019. Deutscher endeavoured to deconstruct the clamorous noises of everyday life, she based the waltz on the sound of the Austrian police sirens she was so struck by when first moving to Vienna; they begin the piece, before orchestrally-recreated car horns and sirens disintegrate and a melody emerges. ‘Most sounds of everyday life are not particularly pleasant or beautiful,’ she says; ‘so it’s certainly not easy to find beauty in them. But it’s worth trying because it’s worth trying to find beauty in everything.’ A mantra perhaps appropriate amidst the sustained devastation of the pandemic into the New Year, I wonder if we all ought to practise Deutscher’s skill of searching-out beauty in ordinariness—though perhaps this might feel a little lacklustre with her orchestral version playing in mind.  

Influenced by the newfound stimulation of the city to which she’d recently moved, Deutscher took the ‘police sirens, the beeping of the closing underground doors, car horns’—sounds wearily metropolitan to the rest of us—and ‘tried to transform them into uplifting melodies,’ trying to ‘compose it in a way that the listeners could follow the gradual transformation from ugly into beautiful.’ Deutscher considers that the effects of music are ‘probably much stronger than painting’, and its power to evoke profound emotion is perhaps what explains why so many have turned to music to drown the noise of the past year’s news headlines. 

But Deutscher says she is sometimes criticised for the lack of ugliness in her music—as though to seek charm in an often unpleasant world is a naïve romanticisation of modern existence—or for reproducing the chirping tunefulness familiar to the musical canon of past centuries. Her musical aesthetics certainly forefront the importance of melody established in musical history, but she insists that ‘melody is the essence of [all] music – this is not just my own musical aesthetics, it’s the aesthetics of almost everyone, young and old. It’s not a great secret that the most loved pieces of music are the ones with the best tunes.’ Indeed, Deutscher cites her second opera, Cinderella, as containing numerous examples of willingly ‘unpleasant’ passages: ‘they are there to make a specific point—for example to convey a storm of anger and pain […] these short bits of ugliness are only there to highlight the beauty of that comes afterwards.’

I am increasingly compelled by Deutscher’s argument that, if the world is already a tumultuous place (of this fact there is little doubt), then why saturate it with even more tunelessness? ‘I don’t see the point of creating ugliness just for the sake of it,’ she concludes resolutely, ‘It’s the easiest thing in the world to create ugly music. You don’t need inspiration, you don’t need talent, you don’t need hard work […] Why should I torture myself and my audience with more of it?’

I ask Deutscher to list her ‘top three’ composers. Apparently, her younger sister always lists a ‘top three’ of everything. My question now feels somewhat juvenile. ‘There are just too many composers that I like in different ways and at different times. When I listen to music, I try to analyse and learn from the aspects that I like, rather than just rank it as number one or number two-and-a-half.’ In the last year, Desutcher has apparently been studying Richard Strauss (try his Vier Letzte Lieder), whose work she found a particular inspiration when revising and re-orchestrating Cinderella. Speaking of her sister, I feel a sudden sympathy for the younger sibling of someone like Deutscher—parental expectations can be weighty at the best of times. But then, I consider whether she might often feel the pressure of the reputation which preceded her in adolescence. Yet it seems that her musical interest is borne of genuine passion—her parents aren’t the pushy showboat sort, but limit her media appearances and performances so as to encourage opportunities that she finds most enjoyable or conducive. ‘I’m very lucky that, so far, almost all the pieces that I composed were pieces that I really wanted to do. So I don’t think I ever really got stuck in the sense of thinking to myself: I hate this piece, why do I have to do it?

Deutscher’s 2019 debut at Carnegie Hall received a standing ovation—a compliment considering the tough New York crowds—and was commended by critics. ‘With big projects,’ she admits, ‘usually the challenge is that there is too little time to finish them.’ But the positive reaction of the public emboldens her to boldly experiment with lengthier pieces, which ‘would be difficult to keep up the motivation for’ if reception was not as balmy. Then again, she says that she is ‘sometimes told by people in the classical music establishment that the style of my music is wrong and heretical’—but doesn’t seem dispirited. Indeed, her career is only truly beginning. 

A child prodigy though she is, lockdown has affected Deutscher just as it has everyone else. Just instead of cancelling concerts she’d planned to attend, the pandemic cancelled concerts she herself had organised. A new production of my opera Cinderella was supposed to open in Salzburg in December after I had spent months on months last year revising it. We even started rehearsing for it in November.’ She remains fairly positive despite the impact on her work, ambitiously hoping for its opening in January. ‘Compared to most musicians, I’m extremely lucky, because as a composer, I’m not wasting my time. I’ve been working on my next opera, Des Kaisers Neuer Walzer (The Emperor’s New Waltz). It’s a romantic comedy about a rich girl falling in love with a poor boy, combined with musical satire inspired by Andersen’s fairy tale.’ This being her third opera, it has already been commissioned by the Salzburg State Theatre for performance in 2022. ‘If Coronavirus had not left so much quiet time,’ she says, ‘I would never have managed to get anywhere near finishing in the short time I still have.’

I wonder if there’s any adolescent typicality underneath the songbooks and melodies and operatic daydreams… ‘when I’m grumpy I rarely get inspiration’, she admits. But the attention and diligence required of serious composing demands a certain sophisticated devotion: ‘putting ideas together, developing them into a larger structure and telling a coherent story with the music’ is more about technique and experience ‘than just about mood’. Does Deutscher listen to pop music? Can classical and popular genres coexist? Apparently so: ‘At least melodic pop music speaks a similar language to classical music in terms of harmony and melody. Just to pluck a completely random example from the air, Irving Berlin’s song Let’s Face the Music and Dance is a stunning melody, based on the chords of the lament bass. And I’m sure any of the great classical masters would have been extremely proud if they had come up with this tune.’ When a friend—who is not a fan of classical—started humming a song by the singer Dimash Kudaibergen, Deutscher identified it as being from Mozart’s opera, The Magic Flute. You’ll likely recognise its famous Der Hölle Rache—the aria sung by the Queen of the Night. ‘So Mozart passes the test of being a good pop composer.’ I’m sure he’d be relieved to hear it.

Being so young, I wonder what success Deutscher will see in the next decade, by the end of which she will not yet even be in her thirties—and this lockdown still won’t have ended. Though if sustained confinement were to be a reality, I daresay musical history would be grateful for the countless operas, sonatas and concertos composed in the quiet it allows her—and if she retains that integrity of musical beauty, things may yet remain a little cheerful. 

Image Credit: Alma Deutscher

Shoulda put a ring on it: rings as a form of self-expression

0

Rings: the often simple form of circular jewellery typically worn on one’s fingers, have a long history. Examples of rings have been found dating back to before 2000BC, and over their 4000 year history they have found their place as a versatile accessory, suitable for anyone and any occasion. 

Yet to this day, there exists a lengthy list of regulations surrounding rings. From traditions on the proper jewellery to wear, to rules on how you should wear them, and most importantly, specifics on how they should be styled. Some rules are more general, applying to jewellery as a whole, whilst others apply specifically to the world of rings. The most prevalent example are the traditions surrounding wedding rings and bands. In the UK, the wedding ring is traditionally worn on the ring finger of the left hand. Engagement rings have been historically reserved for women, and after the wedding the engagement ring is worn together with the wedding ring on the same finger. Diamond rings were also seen as only for women.  

However, in recent years rings have for many people become the ultimate form of self-expression despite these rules and traditions. Wedding rings and engagement rings are becoming less popular among the younger generations as their ideas about marriage and relationships change. For those that opt for them, they often avoid the flashier options. The now wide-spread knowledge of the use of conflict minerals in high-end jewellery, particularly diamonds, alongside the economic realities faced by young couples have led to more understated choices. A higher proportion of men are wearing engagement rings and at the same time, more and more couples are opting to ditch engagement rings all together, particularly given the problematic gender dynamic involved with them. 

These changes are not limited to wedding rings. With the release of La Manso’s most recent collection of rings, there is a focus on plastic rings in bright colours. This demonstrates a distinct change from traditional rings utilising metal, and the association that rings, and jewellery in general, should only be stylised as ‘luxury’. These rings provide a unique fashion statement, a clear marker of one’s own style. They also represent a move away from more problematic usages of fast fashion to buy cheaper metal jewellery, as well as from conflict minerals in more expensive pieces. Changes in gender norms have also changed the ring market, with men increasingly using rings as a form of self expression outside of the traditional wedding band or signet ring. As seen in many celebrity looks, men have adopted rings in a wide-array of styles, some opting for more minimalist looks, whilst others stack rings or choose to flex heavily jewelled pieces. 

Stacking rings, whilst not a new idea, having been popular across Europe for both men and women in the Middle-Ages, marks the pinnacle of rule-breaking self-expression when it comes to jewellery. As such, it is an extremely popular look at the moment and is surprisingly easy to pull off. The choices made when stacking rings say a lot about the wearer, whether deliberate or not. Stacking rings allows for simpler pieces to be elevated and older pieces to be reused; one is able to mix metals, different coloured jewels, and combine high and low-end pieces to form their own unique look – expressing all the wearer wants to say with just their hands.

The choices made by all genders in creating such looks are able to function as a form of self-expression never seen before. Beneath the beauty of the rings themselves, you are able to read deeply into the wearer’s personality and sense of style as you understand how they choose to break the rules and depart from traditions.

PhysPhil students receive results 101 days after exams end

0

Since their last exam on October 16, it took until this Monday for Physics and Philosophy (commonly abbreviated to PhysPhil) students to receive results. The cohort, now in their fourth and final year, have had to apply to jobs and graduate studies with only second-year results.

In June of 2020, PhysPhil students sat the philosophy component of their exams. There is only one paper unique to the PhysPhil degree; all others that PhysPhil students may have taken were offered to philosophy students across degrees. Finalists for degrees such as PPE received their exam results in July, but PhysPhil students received no results – even for papers they had in common with other courses.

The physics exams were held in 0th and 1st week of Michaelmas 2020, ending on October 16. Physics students received their results two weeks ago, but results were again withheld from PhysPhil students.

On November 25, the Department of Physics told PhysPhil students: “The examiners acutely understand that students (and their tutors) require the examination results to be published – the examiners are doing all they can to make this happen as soon as possible. The results will be published when they are published.”

On December 4, another email to students stated: “There is no past experience for Michaelmas Term Physics examinations, rather this is in addition to a normal busy Michaelmas Term. It is therefore regrettable that we are unable to provide a definitive date for the publication of examination results, even a worst-case date. All colleagues involved in the examining process are doing all they can to make this happen as soon as they can.”

On January 15, after being asked for a date for the examiner’s meeting or an idea of when results would be given, the brief response was: “There are no updates”.

Then, on January 25, results were released, with no accompanying explanation for the delay.

A PhysPhil student told Cherwell: “The situation is ridiculous: even accounting for the pandemic, the reason it took over two weeks longer than the physicists to get results is because of exams we did six months ago. The complete lack of communication from a PhysPhil authority, with no acknowledgement, apology or explanation for the delay and no message whatsoever on when we could expect results, strongly suggests that students’ interests weren’t a priority. The inability to contact examiners directly without serious consequences made it impossible to hold them accountable to any sort of reasonable deadline. This not only disadvantaged us when applying for further study or jobs, but also adversely affected students’ mental health in an already difficult time.”

One student is planning on filing a complaint with the departments.

The Physics Faculty told Cherwell “Results for the MPhysPhil degree have been published.

While there is overlap in content as regards physics, to release results for a joint school involves additional steps. This is more apparent when operating within the current environment and the restrictions that that brings with it.

Regarding Ph.D applications, tutor references play a very important part and tutors are usually in a very good position to give assessments of a candidate’s ability and performance. Students concerned on this front are advised to speak to their college tutors.

We are sorry to hear that some students feel that their interests are not a priority and we would like to give assurance that this is absolutely not the case. Staff are working very hard, having to balance workload with additional strain imposed by Covid-related matters (childcare, home schooling, working remotely). The PJCC [Physics Joint Consultative  Committee, consisting of both Physics and a Physics & Philosophy student representatives] has a good understanding of the situation and students may, as always, use that channel to obtain advice or gain reassurance about their degree course. Students who feel that their mental health has been affected are advised, again, to speak with their college tutor, or otherwise to make contact with the welfare networks in college.”

The University has been contacted for comment.

Dire wolves: not just in the fantasy world of Game of Thrones

0

Dire wolves were real creatures, not just created from the mind of George R.R. Martin. They, alongside a range of massive creatures known as megafauna, disappeared from America in a mass extinction during the Pleistocene Period.

However, a research project involving Oxford archaeologists as part of a near 50-strong team have uncovered further information about this extinct species: enough information to successfully sequence the DNA of a dire wolf.  

Professor Greger Larson, Director of the Palaeogenomics and Bio-Archaeology Research Network and one of the academics involved in this project, told Cherwell: “There were a lot of unanswered questions about dire wolves and we wanted to see if we could apply an ancient DNA approach to generate Dire Wolf DNA to answer those questions.”

Dozens of remains of dire wolves were located and examined with limited success. Yet the close collaboration of this global academic team was able to generate partial genomes from five specimens in the US.

Nuclear DNA testing established that they had evolved separately from other canids. The study found no indication of matings between dire wolves and other canid species, which could be a reason why they went extinct and other North American canids, such as wolves, survived the extinction.

In response to a further inquiry into what the next stages of this research might look like, Professor Larson said: “Ideally we’d like to get a much better genome or two so that we can address questions about selection and population size and how the dire wolves responded to the changing climate at the end of the Pleistocene.”

In the announcement by the University of Oxford mentioned the idea of “a ‘Pleistocene Park’ of towering megafauna may one day be a possibility”. When questioned about this, Professor Larson said “Well, never say never. We can get DNA from dire wolves and we now know how closely they are related to modern canids so if cloning becomes a thing, maybe we can resurrect dire wolves.”

Professor Larson spoke of this collaboration as “a joy to be a part of”, especially with “so many young academics taking the lead”. Speaking further to Cherwell, he elaborated: “The past is a foreign country. The more we know about it the more we know about ourselves and the more empathy we can generate for each other and our planet. The more young scientists that are involved in these studies the greater the likelihood that science can continue to make the modern world a better place.”

New ICU unit planned for the John Radcliffe Hospital

0

Plans for a new intensive care unit in the John Radcliffe Hospital have been submitted. It would triple critical care capacity from 16 to 48 intensive care beds. This new capacity would also serve Buckinghamshire and West Berkshire.

The Oxford University Hospitals (OUH) NHS Trust believes the building is an “urgent requirement” as the John Radcliffe’s critical care unit is currently stretched by a large number of patients ill with Covid-19. The trust told the BBC a new unit would “support further pandemic and seasonal pressures” and “given the nature of the pandemic, the increase in critical care capacity must happen at speed”.

The OUH NHS Trust have said they are facing double the number of patients ill with Covid-19 than in the country’s first wave. The John Radcliffe Hospital are dealing with a large number of patients ill with Covid-19 in intensive care, mounting pressure on staff and the hospital’s services. This has forced the trust to cancel all non-essential surgery.

Oxford are facing a high number of coronavirus cases with rates at 531.1 per 100,000, higher than the national rate of 520.4 per 100,000 as of 18th January. Pressure on Oxford’s hospitals has increased, which in turn has created a shortage of intensive care beds. 

A new ICU would include 32 more intensive care beds set out in a “race-track” formation. This layout, used in many world-class critical care units, places nursing in a central area with hospital beds around the ward’s perimeter. It increases patient visibility to staff and facilitates their movement around the unit. The new formation intends to optimise natural light on patients.

The plans also involve demolishing the existing Barnes Care Unit in a 5-story building connected to the central hospital.

Credit Image: Jackie Bowman/CC BY-SA 2.0.