Monday 18th August 2025
Blog Page 392

Covered Market remains open despite lockdown

0

Oxford’s iconic Covered Market is remaining open, despite new lockdown restrictions, in order to allow non-essential shopping.

Traders such as Bonners Oxford grocery, Cardew’s coffee and tea shop, the Oxford Sandwich co. and Ben’s Cookies are remaining open for in-person shopping or providing takeaway food. Other retailers have moved to trading online exclusively, or offering click-and-collect.

It is mandatory for shoppers to wear a mask inside the Covered Market. Shoppers will also need to abide by social distancing measures such as queuing systems, which may differ between shops. Seating in the market has also been removed to prevent people from congregating.

Restrictions imposed under the national lockdown in place since January 6th require all “non-essential” shops to close. Shops providing “essential services” include hardware shops, pet shops, laundrettes, banks, and food shops.

Full details on which traders are operating can be found on the Covered Market website.

Image: Jorge Royan/CC BY-SA 3.0 via Wikimedia Commons.

Time Alone

The echo in the chapel chimes

as I take my unlikely seat.

It  greets this new intoxication

with a moment I want to place

and hold 

in a space of reverence;

this inebriety

as sober and calculated,

as bold

as the meaning I give

to the ticking silence.

And in this space of time

you can give any shape to –

you can call it a sea,

concentrate it into a crest,

a moon, a breeze –

I want to wrap myself

beneath the branches of a tree,

– maybe in a vineyard –

and breathe in 

and drink

all the ripples.

Image Credit to the author.

The Potter

Did you ever meet the man, 

Who lived once in this place?

Seen so many winters he, 

That rust grew round his face. 

Glaze and wheel and kiln, 

Each he gave its spot, 

Moulding earthly heaps,

Homes for ferns and apricots.

Much he did not have, 

Giving instead to what he made:

The strength to last a thousand years,

Never to sag or melt or fade.

Pastel clayful creatures,

Yellow, green and blue, 

Greater than what nature formed,

But natural through and through.   

Muscles weary like a watch 

That’s fallen off the pace, 

Implored his hands 

To work as they had,

In the analogue age.

When time was up he gave the place to me,

I wonder what it was that he could see?

Turned to me that day he did,

Mischief breaking through the rust, 

Did you ever meet a man, he said, 

Who thought that he was lost? 

No, I said, I reckon not,

Pity, he said, I should have liked to make him a pot. 

Image Credit to the author.

Emergency accommodation for rough sleepers in Oxford open for 19 consecutive days

0

On Tuesday, 12 January, the Oxford City Council re-activated its severe weather emergency protocol (SWEP), providing emergency beds for people experiencing rough sleeping.

The SWEP is activated every night when the Met Office forecasts temperatures to fall below zero overnight. It could also be activated in other severe weather conditions such as snow. It was open for 19 consecutive nights this winter, from 23 December to the morning of 11 January. This is the longest continuous duration which the SWEP has remained open. The SWEP was then opened once again on 12 January.

The SWEP has been open for extended periods on a few occasions in the past. In March and April 2013, the SWEP was open for 12 consecutive nights. This occurred again in February to March 2018, when the British Isles experienced the Beast from the East cold wave.

On average, 10 people per night have accessed SWEP accommodation so far this winter, according to data released by the Oxford City Council. The number peaked at 17 people on both New Year’s Eve and New Year’s Day.

In view of the ongoing pandemic, rough sleepers in SWEP accommodation are now offered their own room for the night, while in previous years they would sleep in shared spaces. The Oxford City Council has secured 25 rooms across 3 venues, and there are contingency plans in place to provide more rooms if the need arises. This has been achieved through collaborations with St Mungo’s, Aspire, and Homeless Oxfordshire, organisations that assist homeless people in Oxfordshire.

“Cold weather can kill. It is vital that everyone who is on the streets, or who is at risk of rough sleeping, can access self-contained accommodation as soon as possible, with adequate support where it is needed. We will continue to work with Oxford City Council to save lives this winter,” said Matt Rudd, regional manager of St Mungo’s in Oxford, in a news release on the Oxford City Council website.

“It has been a privilege to provide relief, dignity and a safe warm space to people experiencing rough sleeping. We’ve also managed to support one rough sleeper into stable accommodation, and former rough sleepers in our supported accommodation are providing peer support to people accessing the SWEP service to ensure they are accessing substance misuse recovery groups in the evenings,” added Paul Roberts, CEO of Aspire.

Since the start of the pandemic, the Council has housed 303 homeless people. Of these, 134 have been provided more permanent housing, including some who had been sleeping rough on a long-term basis. The Oxfordshire County Council has also recently provided additional funding to help rough sleepers in Oxford access more support for problems with drug and alcohol use. Oxford City will receive £584,000 initially, with additional funding available in subsequent years, to address intensive substance misuse, according to a press release from the Oxfordshire County Council.

Photo: Garry Knight, via Wikimedia Commons.

Thames Valley Police will fine those who “wilfully and blatantly” break lockdown rules

0

In a message released to residents on Friday, 9th January, Thames Valley Police announced that they will enforce UK lockdown restrictions when they encounter people who are “wilfully and blatantly ignoring the laws.”

Chief Superintendent Robert France, Gold Commander for Thames Valley Police’s coronavirus response, urged “anyone thinking of attending or organising [an event] not to do so,” warning that organisers as well as attendees could face fines. 

Thames Valley Police, the largest non-metropolitan police force in England and Wales serving 2 million people across Buckinghamshire, Berkshire and Oxfordshire, warned that event organisers “could be given a substantial £10,000 fine and those attending will face enforcement through a fine,” fixed at £200 for a first offence, doubling at further offences up to £6,400

“Our officers will continue to engage, explain and encourage people to abide by the restrictions,” said Chief Superintendent France. “Where people have genuinely misunderstood the rules, or where there is an element of complexity, a simple reminder of the regulations is often enough for them to comply.” 

However, if necessary, officers will have no qualms moving to the fourth “e” – enforcement. Meanwhile, Metropolitan Police commissioner Dame Cressida Dick said in a statement that lockdown fines were “increasingly likely”. Home Secretary Priti Patel defended police presence in a press conference on Tuesday (12 January), where she confirmed 45,000 fixed fine notices have been handed out across England for lockdown breaches to date. 

There has been a marked rise in assault against police officers since the start of the coronavirus pandemic, with Thames Valley Police reporting 198 cases of officer assault in March and April, an increase of 40 compared to the same period last year. Vice-Chair of the Police Federation of England and Wales Ché Donald said he was “appalled” by the 31% surge in emergency worker assaults across the UK this year, which he described as “totally unacceptable”.

The government’s message remains stay home, protect the NHS and Save Lives. For the full list of what you can and cannot do during lockdown, visit the coronavirus restrictions page on www.gov.uk.

Image: Wikimedia Commons.

BREAKING: University confirms 45 positive cases this week

0

The University has confirmed 45 cases of Covid-19 amongst staff and students from Early Alert Service tests for the 9th-15th January, with a positivity rate of 20.3%. This does not include the results from the Lateral Flow Tests that students have been encouraged to take upon returning to campus. 222 tests were administered by the University service in total this week. 

The University’s Status and Response page notes that “due to the time interval between a test being done and the result becoming available, it is expected that there will be a mismatch between actual results and those confirmed to us on any given day.” Their figures do not include positive tests recorded outside of the University testing service. 

There were 288 new cases in the county of Oxfordshire on Sunday the 17th of January, according to Oxfordshire County Council, and 96 new cases in the city of Oxford. This comes as Oxford City Council urges residents to stay at home

Ansaf Azhar, Oxfordshire County Council’s Director for Public Health, said: “The prevalence of COVID in Oxfordshire is higher than it has ever been. We are in a worse position than at the height of the first wave last spring, and the situation is continuing to deteriorate.”

“We are relying on the people of Oxfordshire as individuals, families and work colleagues to regain control of this virus by doing what is needed. I would plead with every individual in the county to look deep inside themselves and honestly ask if they are abiding by the rules.”

The Crown’s Unspoken Words

0

The release of Series 4 of Netflix’s The Crown in November of this year has provoked conversation about the level of truth in the depiction of the royal family; the history which lies behind the drama. In fact, articles abound online questioning the accuracy of the show and purporting to reveal “The Real History” behind what The Crown shows – as if the category of “History” is stable and immutable, and not a subjective and superfluous concept.

In considering The Crown’s depiction of “history” and its relation to the genre of biopic, I cannot help but remember the similar swathes of article which followed the release of the 2018 film The Favourite, which similarly presents the life of royalty, but this time the 18th century monarch Queen Anne (played by Olivia Colman).  The Favourite’s depiction of Anne led to controversy due to its portrayal of her relationships with her courtiers Abigail Hill (played by Emma Stone) and Sarah Churchill (played by Rachel Weisz).  The film centres around the sexual relationship between Anne and the two women as each tries to win her affections and therefore the power she holds, contending with each other and Anne’s fickle nature.  The Favourite and its cast were nominated for ten Oscars in 2019, including Best Original Screenplay, Best Cinematography, and Best Picture, and Colman won the Oscar for Best Actress for her performance as the Queen.  Evidently, the film was a critical success. Yet, people were not satisfied with the film’s critical merits; they wanted to know the truth behind what was presented.  Was Queen Anne really a lesbian?  Did Hill and Churchill really fight over her?  What is the “real history” behind it all?  

It seems, then, that any depiction of royalty, from any period, is subject to criticism in its blurring of fact and fiction. Unlike The Favourite, however, the main problem (or strength perhaps) of The Crown lies in its setting in recent history.  Series 4 covers a period spanning from 1979 to the early 1990s; depicting events which many viewers will have experienced firsthand.  For example, the 1981 wedding of Charles and Diana is carefully re-enacted, as is the death of Lord Mountbatten in 1979.  But it is not the depiction of these well-documented events which is causing the controversy; it’s what lies behind these famous weddings and funerals, the undocumented words of the royals, which the writers have had to guess at, and then dramatise, that seems to have caused a problem.  Did Queen Elizabeth really go about seeking out which child was her favourite (as in episode 4)?  Did Michael Fagan (who broke into Buckingham palace in 1982) really give an impassioned speech about the effect that Margaret Thatcher’s policies were having on the working class?  

The question I want to ask though, is do those details really matter?

I think, when it comes to any biopic, “real history” has to be deprioritised.  If an accurate and chronological rendering of history is what you’re looking for, watch a documentary! The Crown may play fast and loose with history here and there; for example, Fagan was reportedly annoyed at the depiction of himself in episode 5 of the show, saying that the actor playing him, Tom Brooke, was “too ugly”, and that a lot of what was depicted during his break-in was pure fiction.  But the dramatisation of this event adds to the overall theme of episode 5.  Whilst not entirely faithful to reality, Fagan’s character acts to highlight the dichotomy between the royals and the general populous during the 1980s; something which Brooke handles well, despite his “ugliness”.

The historical events depicted act more as metaphors for the interactions between the royal family that we’ll never be privy to.  The fights between Charles (played by Josh O’Connor) and Diana (played by Emma Corrin) may not have happened as depicted, but the actors do a brilliant job of bringing out the instability in the relationship, and how unalike and unsuited Charles and Diana were, showing both of their flaws (Charles’ long-standing affair with Camilla Parker-Bowles, and Diana’s lack of understanding of Charles’ aversion to publicity stunts). Neither vilified nor sanctified, Charles and Diana are represented solely as humans with problems of their own.  Despite criticism that The Crown depicts Prince Charles as cold and uncaring towards Diana, the writers also can be sympathetic, leaving out the ‘Tampongate’ scandal between Charles and Camilla.  The writers do an excellent job of taking into account both sides of the story, with three previous series of exposition and context as to why certain characters act like they do.

What The Crown succeeds so well in, then, is taking a subject matter which is as simultaneously secretive and publicised as the royal family, and presenting them as what they are: a family with problems, arguments, affairs, divorces, laughter, jealousy (the list goes on) just like our own family.  And if it makes for good television, does it really matter that there’s a bit of exaggeration?

Artwork by Emma Hewlett

In Conversation with Hannah Witton

0

Hannah Witton’s Zoom background puts the rest of us to shame. She is sat in an armchair with a tidy but colourful bookcase to her right and a bright white wall to her left. Professional yet relaxed, the room is crying out to be turned into a thumbnail. As soon as the call connects, I cannot help but sit up straight, rearrange my hair, and shift the angle of my camera slightly, so as to obscure as much as possible of my own background: my childhood bedroom strewn with the remnants of a recent ten-day isolation.

Youtuber, author, podcast presenter and sex educator, Hannah Witton has dedicated her career to campaigning for and providing holistic sex education in the UK. “Whilst [sex education] is covering important things, it’s just not giving people the full picture of sexuality and sexual relationships,” Hannah tells me. “It is very much in the preventative realm surrounding contraception, pregnancy and STIs and it never really goes into the fact that sex is meant to be pleasurable”. According to the 2019 Relationships and Sexual Education Survey, only 31% of students feel they have been taught all they need to know about sexual pleasure. The figure for contraception, on the other hand, is 86%. Instead of focussing on “all the things that could go wrong”, Hannah advocates for education that covers “the ways to make your social, personal and romantic relationships healthy, fun and pleasurable in the widest sense of the term”. 

But before she can even begin to broach the subject of pleasure, Hannah is stuck “having conversations about the fact that sex, or any kind of penetration, should not be painful”. “We were all lied to,” she says, for the first time raising her voice. “I remember thinking that there was no way around it, that if you had a vulva, the first time you have penetrative sex, it will hurt […] what a messed up thing to be taught”. Painful sex, society would have women believe, is “the price we’ve got to pay for having a vulva […] it’s our eternal punishment”.

Sex education fails on another front too, in its “narrow and rigid view of sexuality and sexual behaviour”. Whilst our normative approach to sex education impacts many intersectional groups, Hannah’s central focus is on the ways in which the disabled community are let down. “Disabled people often aren’t seen as sexual beings, as having any kind of sexual desires, needs or wants, but are also not being seen as viable, desirable sexual partners. So many people would just automatically write off somebody if they saw that they had a visible disability, but it’s because there’s such a lack of education around it”.

At the moment, she says, we are asking all the wrong questions: “How many times do you have sex? How often do you have sex? What kind of sex are you having?”. The hierarchy of sexual acts allows society to define what it considers to be ‘real’ sex, a definition that can often exclude people who have physical disabilities. “If we put pleasure first rather than metrics […] we’ll all have more sex”. For Hannah, the question we should really be asking is “what feels good?”.

Hannah admits that this was an intersection that she had never considered before it impacted her directly, which she regretfully calls a “symptom of a society that often ignores disabled people”. In 2018, after a bad flare of ulcerative colitis, Hannah had an ileostomy, which means that she now has a stoma, an opening in the abdomen that allows digestive waste to be diverted out of the body. “There was a lot to overcome in terms of feeling like my body was mine again. Feeling like I had control and agency, feeling like it was connected to me and feeling like it wasn’t this thing that was trying to kill me – because my body definitely tried to kill me”. 

“When you are suddenly in a different situation where you can’t do the same things that you used to be able to do, you start thinking more creatively. You start to think outside of the box, you can’t follow this script that we’ve all been given. What else can you do instead? […] There may be limitations, there may be restrictions, but there can still be pleasure. One of the things that it’s opened up in my world is crotchless underwear […] it’s something sexy that keeps the stoma bag out of the way”. 

I ask Hannah how she thinks COVID-19 restrictions have impacted the ways that people are having sex. “It’s hard for people. But there are ways to still feel that kind of connection. And there are also ways to be sexy with people remotely […] it’s about deciding if that’s what you want to do, exploring it by yourself and with other people and seeing how it feels”. “Whilst I don’t like to put romantic and sexual relationships on a pedestal, they do serve their own purpose. We can’t deny that. […] Flirting is so fun and energetic, and there’s that exciting feeling of meeting a new person and seeing if there’s any chemistry. […] It’s a shame that people are not being able to experience that”.

But Hannah is hopeful that there will be a silver lining. “We now have this shared language in our society, this collective understanding around public health – and sexual health is also a public health issue […] in theory, in an ideal world, we don’t treat disclosing our STI status any differently than we would to disclosing our COVID status”.

The label ‘sex-positive’ would seem to apply to Hannah pretty unproblematically. But when I ask, she is hesitant to accept the term outright. “The problem is, if you go so hard and so enthusiastic down that route, you forget that a lot of people have negative or even traumatic experiences when it comes to sex. And then it can also alienate asexual people as well”. For Hannah, the term ‘sex critical’ is more representative of her beliefs, incorporating both the good and the bad when it comes to sexual experiences. 

Taking the porn industry as an example, Hannah tells me that whilst someone who is sex-positive might view porn as a healthy way to discover sexual preferences and a liberatory avenue of female sexual expression, someone who is sex critical would scrutinise the industry itself, its exploitation of sex workers and its unsafe labour practices. “We need to be listening to all sex workers. There are lots of different reasons why people will go into sex work”. She leans in and lowers her voice; “there’s lots of different reasons why people go into any kind of work. We really need to be treating sex work in the same way that we would treat any work”.

At the time of our conversation, Pornhub has just announced its decision to remove all unverified content from its platform in order to combat the scourge of child abuse videos that had been found on the site. “We’ll see how that works”, Hannah tells me, “but there is just this general pattern of ‘save the children’ – which is absolutely a noble cause – but the way that governments and businesses try and go about it tends to actually not save the children; […] it trickles down and then consenting adults, sex workers and sex educators as well are being penalized. […] I’m all for holding Pornhub accountable for its shit”. 

“There’s really no good places online for sex workers to make a living safely without the risk of platforms deciding that they don’t want to be associated with them anymore. We saw Tumblr do it. We saw OnlyFans this year. I don’t know if that’s what’s happening with PornHub right now. I imagine it might be a side effect. [Sex workers] are already at the bottom of the barrel of society. It doesn’t matter if we squish them more. That’s what it feels like”.

We say our goodbyes and hang up the call. Thinking back now, I can’t quite believe how comfortable I had been to talk so freely about sex with a stranger on the internet. But Hannah’s attitude was infectious. I had been given a glimpse of what conversations about sex should look like; never condescending, never exclusionary, always honest. Whilst sex education in the UK continues to be embarrassed by its own existence, it is down to people like Hannah to remind us that sex is something worth talking about.

Image credit: Rebecca Need-Menear

The bloody problem of PMS research

Women have historically been side-lined from medical attention at a greater degree than men and there is little known about the premenstrual syndrome (PMS), as it is not validated as a legitimate condition even though it often requires treatment. Over 90% of women and trans men report experiencing premenstrual symptoms, such as bloating, moodiness, cramps or fatigue. PMS could be defined as ‘a series of symptoms arising the week prior to menstruation and ending the first day of menses.’ However, most women and trans men have little knowledge of the direct causes of the issue or specific treatments. So why is this gender bias still persistent in medical research in the twenty-first century?

Some trans men still have a period every month, if they have not undergone gender assignment surgery or do not take hormones. Yet, for trans men who suffer from various symptoms before they have their periods, menstrual blood could be viewed as more than a shameful bodily fluid; the blood may function as a reminder of part of themselves that they do not identify with.

The research that has been carried out for PMS so far remains largely inconclusive. Women’s and trans men’s bodies are viewed as abnormal even iniquitous, therefore their sexual subjectivities are excluded from critical health care. The medical treatment provided to them most of the time is sporadic and insufficient, so they continue to experience physical pain and discomfort. They are often excluded because their symptoms are viewed as illegitimate, portraying women and trans men as hysteric. In many situations, women and trans men are told -“it’s all in your head”.

Even though menstruation is a biological reality, it is formulated as a social construct. Society affects one’s experience of having a period and how one deals with it. In most patriarchal cultures, the experience of menstruation is permeated by feelings of shame and secrecy, as menstruation is considered as something unclean. The double standard of constructing men’s bodies as “clean” but women’s bodies as “dirty” should be challenged. Unfortunately, the negative perception of menstruation can lead to ‘body shame, self-objectification, and lack of agency in sexual decision-making.’

In order to combat the gender bias in medical research, the distinction among sex and gender is crucial. Gender needs to be viewed as a fluid category instead of as an essential one. Women used to be viewed as the weaker sex due to their closeness to nature, therefore when they were menstruating they were viewed as monstrous as they were unable to “control” their bodies. In the same vein, trans men were viewed as occupying monstrous bodies due to their “unnaturalness”. However, who defines what is “natural”? There is no straightforward answer to this, as the norm is a social construct. Thus, it is important to bring attention to the interconnectedness between sex, gender, body and sexual orientation. As Annandale and Clark suggest:

We artificially, and inappropriately, divide people into two camps…we build a series of other characteristics on top of gender i.e. […] women are irrational, men are rational and so on…real life experience is not like this; attributes and experiences like acting rationally or being healthy cross-cut gender and are not the province of men or women as a group’.

The fear towards those who do not conform to the sex and gender order is still pervasive today. De-gendering menstruation is vital in order to be able to deal with the taboos surrounding PMS in a gender-inclusive way. Therefore, it is necessary to acknowledge the multiplicity of menstrual realities that different bodies experience.

In conclusion, the lack of adequate medical research around PMS is a cultural construct. There is a major gap in studying menstruation because patriarchal culture silences the discourse of women and subsequently trans men who are viewed as marginal entities. Their bodies are asserted yet at the same time negated from popular culture. What is being silenced and absent in discourse is constantly spoken of. It is necessary for trans men’s experiences to be contextualized in order to alleviate their sense of isolation and to de-stigmatize menstruation.  

Image credit: Photo by National Cancer Institute on Unsplash

What does the climate crisis mean for global health?

The debate around the effects of the climate crisis often centres around the extreme weather conditions, destruction of habitats and economic costs of damage. But the consequences of climate change are also becoming an increasingly dangerous threat to global health. With a growing risk of infectious disease spread and a sharp rise in heat-related mortalities and malnutrition within the last two decades, it’s clear that the World Health Organisation were right to declare climate change one of the major health challenges of the 21st century. What remains to be seen is how we can combat the interacting crises and protect vulnerable populations from the jeopardy of a rapidly changing world.

One of the most concerning repercussions of the climate crisis is the increasing risk of infectious diseases. A warming climate means that longer periods of the year are suitable for transmission of vector-borne diseases such as malaria, Dengue fever, and Lyme disease, and rapid urbanisation in rural areas like the Amazon rainforest allows mosquitoes and the viruses that they carry to move into urban centres and neighbouring rural spaces. 

Before 1970, only nine countries had experienced serious outbreaks of Dengue, a seasonal mosquito-borne disease usually found in the tropics. 50 years later, it is endemic to over 100 countries. Scientists say that hotter, warmer weather produces ideal conditions for mosquitoes and their associated disease transmission, and the rising global temperatures mean that they can survive better at higher altitudes and latitudes. International travel and global trade have further contributed to the spread of the disease, with insects hitchhiking on used tires and in shipping containers. It’s impossible to attribute an exact number of infections and deaths to the change in climate, but evidently movements to combat the climate crisis would help, not hinder, global health.

On the topic of infectious diseases, one outbreak has affected more of us worldwide than any other in recent memory: Covid-19. Scientists have speculated on the relationship between the climate and the pandemic, and it has been suggested that among other dynamics, the socio-economic changes caused by the climate crisis have pushed humans closer in proximity to livestock, pathogens and vectors. Factors such as the increase in international travel and global trade have contributed to both crises. 

But perhaps the most important element of the relationship between climate change and the pandemic to consider is the impact of our response to Covid-19 on the climate. Economic recovery packages will need to prioritise forms of energy and transport which are beneficial to global health. This will require investment into renewable energy and active travel policies, instead of focusing on fossil fuel intensive investments. The 7% decrease in carbon dioxide emissions in 2020 due to a frozen economy and limited travel will translate into a reduction of only 0.01°C by 2050. A potentially harmful rebound in economic activity, similar to the boom in gas emissions after the 2008 financial crisis, could have disastrous effects. In combatting the pandemic by protecting vulnerable populations, developing preparedness measures and focusing on our healthcare systems, we can take similar steps to those needed to tackle the extreme effects of climate change.

Climate change also threatens global health in ways other than infectious diseases. Decreases in crop yields and the resulting raised prices lead to malnutrition, disproportionately affecting children in areas that rely on agriculture. Rising global temperatures are causing significantly more heat-related deaths; the heatwave of 2003 is estimated to have killed more than 70,000 people in Europe. Those temperatures are projected to occur every other year by the 2030s. More extreme weather like flooding can create ideal conditions for the outbreak of waterborne diseases, and the deadly effects of air pollution, caused by industrial gas emissions, are heightened in warmer weather. 

The combination of effects the climate has on our health is most drastically felt by those in areas prone to climatic weather like floods, living conditions with improper infrastructure, areas affected by rapid urbanisation, air pollution, and other interacting circumstances. Undoubtedly, these threats to global health have a disproportionate impact on developing countries and more vulnerable populations. 

So, in implementing preventative measures, we need to account for these unequal effects. Increasing risk reduction education in hazard-prone regions, working to eradicate malaria and other diseases, and investing in sustainable urban expansion will all benefit those who are most at risk of health threats. But we can best tackle the effects of climate change on global health by combatting the climate crisis. If the pandemic has taught us anything, it’s that we can uproot and restructure our health services and daily lives almost overnight. If we use the same framework of social and infrastructural changes to confront climate change, we may beat both crises altogether. 

Image credit: Photo by Paddy O Sullivan on Unsplash