Sunday 10th May 2026
Blog Page 395

“No plans” for compulsory vaccination, Oxford University says

0

Currently, there are no plans for it to be compulsory for students to be fully vaccinated when they arrive at Oxford for the start of Michaelmas term, according to an Oxford University spokesperson.

The news comes after reports that Prime Minister Boris Johnson wanted students to be fully vaccinated in order to attend lectures or stay in university residences in the autumn. The Times reported that Mr Johnson was “raging” about the relatively low uptake of COVID-19 vaccines among younger age groups compared to older ones. As of July 31st, 61.3% of 18-24 year olds have had at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine.

The proposals were condemned by the National Union of Students, who said the government was “lining students up as scapegoats for its own failings”. The Guardian also reported that universities had concerns about implementing these restrictions, such as how they would be enforced.

The Department of Education later confirmed that the government had no plans to introduce vaccine passports for students in England.

Oxford University’s webpage for returning students and offer holders says they “encourage everyone to take up the offer of a COVID-19 vaccination when eligible, ideally before arriving in Oxford at the start of the autumn (Michaelmas) term.

“All adults in the UK currently have access to a vaccine though the National Health Service – and international students are eligible to access it for free, regardless of their nationality or immigration status.”

A spokesperson for the University told Cherwell: “There are no current plans for vaccination to be compulsory at the University.”

The UK government has confirmed that proof of vaccination status will be required to enter nightclubs and other venues where large crowds gather. It is hoped that this will improve the uptake of COVID-19 vaccines among younger age groups.

The University says: “We are currently exploring options for students who have not yet been vaccinated at the start of the academic year – particularly those who live outside the UK, and further information about this will follow as soon as possible.”

Further information for offer holders and students returning to Oxford in Michaelmas term can be found here.

Image: Hello I’m Nik via unsplash.com

Dean of the Faculty of Law launches #RaceMeToo

0

CW: Racism

Mindy Chen-Wishart, Dean of the Law Faculty and Professor of Contract Law has launched the #RaceMeToo Twitter campaign. She aims to fight prejudice faced by BAME academics and students. 

Professor Chen-Wishart was born in Taiwan as one of four daughters of an Olympic gymnastics coach, and became an immigrant to New Zealand at the age of 10, before she was attracted to Oxford with a Rhodes Visiting Fellowship. But, nearly thirty years of experience at this institution and the prestigious deanship of a faculty have not prevented her from facing regular racial harassment.

Even in the last few weeks, a man subjected her and her three sons to a torrent of racist abuse in the street. Facilities management interrogated her before allowing entrance into her own office. In a reply to Cherwell, she noted an exchange with a member of facilities management who asked her “Who do you have an appointment with?”

Professor Chen-Wishart responded: “I am the Dean”. 

New to Twitter, she decided to use the platform to share some of her experiences as a BAME academic. What followed was an outpouring of support, recognition and solidarity.

Tweeting under ‘#RaceMeToo’ she and other BAME academics used the hashtag to illustrate the casual racism that they face in their everyday careers.

Similarly, a recent inquiry held by the Equality and Human Rights Commission found that a quarter of ethnic minority students had experienced racial harassment.

Responses to #RaceMeToo have ranged from shock at her experiences to solidarity from non-BAME people. But mostly, what followed was recognition. “Recognition of having experienced the same, relief that their extremely hurtful (“humiliating”) experiences were being aired and called out by someone who had ‘made it’.”   

Speaking to Cherwell,  Professor Chen-Wishart said: “We all have unconscious bias. To deny it is an oxymoron. We need to be capable of transcending our own subjectivity, to enter the world of others, and to care enough not to hurt or exclude them.” 

Beyond that, she detailed some expectations of the University:

“(i) Listen to POC. Invite them to share their experiences as students, as academics, researchers, and staff. Have a campaign.

“(ii) Signal from the top the importance of diversity and inclusion, and continue to do so. Allocate proper resources to it…

“(iii) Enhance training of support services (especially [Facilities Management] and porters) beyond the current unconscious bias and customer service, so that POC are not constantly challenged and made to feel they don’t belong. The impact can be devastating.

“(iv) Put E&D representation on the appointment panels. This is important not just for race, but for all protected characteristics.

“(v) Recognise the Cultural taxation on POC; i.e. extra work that Faculty of Colour do to serve the University’s needs for ethnic representation on committees, or to demonstrate knowledge and commitment to a cultural group, which, though it may bring accolades to the institution, is not usually rewarded by the institution on whose behalf the service was performed…

“(vi) Act: Do ask for more information, more data, more interpretation, more papers and reports. But, don’t delay acting until the never never when academics are fully satisfied they are doing the right thing.”

Professor Chen-Wishart added: “‘The opposite of love is not hate, it’s indifference’ – Elie Wiesel. This is the intangible but consequential stuff of unconscious bias. While it is no longer legal to discriminate against POC, women, disabled, and other minorities, we are often not admitted into the natural and easy social circle of belonging.”  

By using her platform to change that indifference, Professor Chen-Wishart hopes to ensure that marginalised groups will feel they belong too.

Image: Professor Chen-Wishart © Warden and Fellows of Merton College; portrait by Ander McIntyre 

Too Horny to Handle? Demonising sex on reality TV

0

Love Island has gripped the nation once more over the past month—the show that encourages hot, single and often relationship-allergic people to couple up and pretend they’re in love for a £50,000 prize. Sound like an original concept? If it does, you obviously haven’t heard of Too Hot to Handle, Netflix’s copycat reality series wherein horny contestants must abstain from sex in order to win (you guessed it) an enormous cash prize. Think of Too Hot to Handle as Love Islands terrifying ex-girlfriend—the people are fitter, the accents are international and the dystopia is played up by the presence of ‘Lana’, a creepy Alexa-like entity that controls the contestants’ sex lives.

Central to both of these shows is the assumption that abstaining from sex leads to better relationships. Although this is more overt in Too Hot to Handle, with Lana enforcing celibacy more rigidly than a headteacher at a Year 11 prom, Love Island encourages couples to wait, with all couples sleeping in the same room and only one designated ‘Hideaway’, for which a couple must be selected by their friends to enter. Those who do have sex are often demonised, most famously in the case of Zara Holland, who, after having sex with Alex Bowen in the show’s second series, faced criticism from her fellow islanders and was controversially stripped of her Miss Great Britain title.

Although things have improved in recent years, there’s still an expectation for islanders to explain themselves once they’ve had sex in the villa (particularly those who don’t go on to end up with their partners). Despite having left the show three years ago, tabloid headlines often return to Megan Barton Hanson, who had sex with two different islanders during her stint. ‘Megan Barton-Hanson reveals she has no regrets about having sex on Love Island they exclaim with constant shock, or ‘Megan Barton Hanson hopes Love Island contestants have sex’. All power to Megan for sticking to her opinions, but the fact that her quotes are dug up every year is testament to how little the disapproval towards contestants who ‘give in’ to their sex drives has abated.

So why this return to the pre-sexual-revolution idea that abstinence equals happiness? Watching Too Hot to Handle, you would think that we were living in the Victorian era rather than the sexually liberated society that many of us recognise. To a modern audience, particularly to those integrated in British universities’ inevitable hook-up culture, this outdated idea of love is at best incompatible with our society’s values and at worst dangerously misogynistic.

According to YouGov, 18-19 year olds have sex 1.8 times a week—sex is a normal part of many casual and serious relationships, and I’m not convinced that TV shows which remove or even ban sex from the dating process are helpful or at all relatable. For one, championing celibacy doesn’t make these shows less superficial, with couples still initially selecting a partner based on physical attraction. Secondly, prohibiting something only means that you want what you can’t have, and there’s a desperate air to both programmes that heighten their tension but also undermines the idea of creating ‘meaningful’ relationships.

Notably, men and women have been seen to react differently to sex being taken off the table, creating painful situations year after year. In the latest series of Too Hot to Handle, contestant Cam’s solution to his sexual frustration was masturbation, whilst his partner Emily abstained, costing him and the rest of the cast $2,000. In Love Island, it’s the infamous ‘Casa Amor’—a secondary villa that separates the boys and girls in order to tempt them with a new cast of singles—that reveals couples’ fault lines. Each year a scorned woman watches as her long-term partner (long-term in Love Island can be defined as any duration between one to several weeks) returns to the villa with a girl that they’ve known for a matter of days. It makes for a depressing viewing. Indeed, banning sex doesn’t really seem to change male contestants’ actions, but merely puts women in a vulnerable position that often ends in heartbreak, like Amy from Love Island’s fifth series.

The outcome of both experiments is also disastrous, and demonstrates pretty effectively why we no longer live in a society where sex is taboo. Both shows’ success rates are unsurprisingly low, with 10 couples still together out of Love Islands 187 contestants, and only two pairs still together from Too Hot to Handle’s latest season. Because you know what’s worse than sleeping with someone on the first date? Being forced to talk to someone you don’t really know for three weeks and convincing yourself that it’s love. Go figure.

Women have only recently been permitted to publicly enjoy sex, albeit only in progressive circles—so why are we returning to shows that take this already contentious liberty away? Although I love Love Island (and even more shamefully, Too Hot to Handle)as much as the next person, the social experiment that these shows implement should stay firmly on screen and be taken with a huge pinch of salt. An abstinence-obsessed past is something that neither TV or real life should return to.

Oxford University received £6.9m from ExxonMobil since 2015

0

An investigation from the student-run Oxford Climate Justice Campaign (OCJC) has revealed that the University of Oxford received £6.9 million from the oil and gas giant ExxonMobil since 2015. This brings the total amount of money the University has received from fossil fuel companies since 2015 to £18.8 million.

OCJC say the information had not been shared previously because the University kept “certain fossil fuel donations secret” under Section 12 of the Freedom of Information Act. OCJC have expressed concern that “it is possible that further donations from fossil fuel companies have been kept secret” using the provision which allows institutions to refuse a freedom of information request if responding would cost too much or take too much staff time to deal with. In contrast, he University of Cambridge reports all grants worth more than £50,000 and information on trust funds established by donations every year.

ExxonMobil have been accused of denying the severity of climate change, and funding climate change denial. They have also been accused of perpetuating human rights abuses. Citizens from Aceh, Indonesia, have taken ExxonMobil to court, alleging they hired and supported military forces who killed and tortured local residents during the period at which ExxonMobil carried out operations in the area.

Carbon Tracker ranked ExxonMobil as having the least ambitious commitments to combat climate change out of all major fossil fuel companies.

Donations received by the University from ExxonMobil since 2015 include £4.4 million towards research into anti-malarial resistance at the University’s Centre for Vaccinology and Tropical Medicine. ExxonMobil also donated £231,869 to the Saïd Business School, which hosted the Oxford Citizen Climate Assembly.

The Saïd Business School confirmed to Cherwell that they had received donations from ExxonMobil between 2013 and 2015. The money was spent on “research into women’s global economic opportunities and effective methods of financial empowerment and autonomy”.

“Since it was a philanthropic donation, the research was conducted independently. ExxonMobil and the other funders had no influence whatsoever on the research or findings,” a spokesperson added.

OCJC said: “These further revelations are shocking and disappointing. They demonstrate just how entwined the fossil fuel industry is in Oxford’s institutions and establishment. We are concerned that the concealment around ExxonMobil may suggest that much more information regarding Oxford’s ties to the fossil fuel industry may still be hidden.

“By recklessly carrying out research on behalf of the fossil fuel industry, and by accepting donations from fossil fuel companies, Oxford continues to provide fossil fuel companies with a social licence to continue to destroy the planet and perpetuate injustice. Oxford must cut its ties to the fossil fuel industry immediately.”

OCJC are also demanding that the Committee to Review Donations and Research Funding develops a policy to ban donations and research funding from fossil fuel companies, incline with existing policies towards tobacco companies.

Associate Professor in Human Geography at the University of Oxford, Amber Murrey, said: “The Oxford Climate Justice Campaign has documented prolonged and alarming patterns of mutual support between the extractive industry and the University. It demands that we have open conversations about the ethics and socio-environmental consequences of fossil fuel extraction and should trigger action by University leadership.”

A spokesperson for ExxonMobil told Cherwell: “The ExxonMobil Foundation supported a range of highly regarded programmes at Oxford, from scholarships to help train future health leaders from developing countries, through a one-year Master of Science degree with a strong focus on global public health threats including malaria, HIV/AIDS and tuberculosis, to research devoted to encouraging the economic empowerment of women through entrepreneurship. These were longstanding, very public philanthropic programmes that provided and continue to provide considerable benefit in developing countries.”

Regarding accusations that the company had denied the severity of climate change, and had funded climate change denial, ExxonMobil told Cherwell: “Allegations about the company’s climate research are inaccurate and misleading.

“ExxonMobil supports the Paris Climate Agreement, and is playing a constructive role in developing solutions. Since 2000, we’ve invested more than $10 billion to research, develop and deploy lower-emission energy technologies. This includes pioneering research in advanced carbon capture and storage, cogeneration, methane emissions reduction and algae-based biofuels. We also advocate for sound public policy that can help facilitate advances in technology, such as putting a price on carbon.  More information is available on our website and on Energy Factor.”

An Oxford University spokesperson told Cherwell: “The University of Oxford safeguards the independence of its teaching and research programmes, regardless of the nature of their funding. Those donating money or sponsoring programmes at the University have no influence over how academics carry out their research or what conclusions they reach. Researchers publish the results of their work whether the results are seen to be critical or favourable by industry or governments.

“Our partnerships with industry allow the University to apply its knowledge to real challenges of pressing global concern, with funding often going directly into research into climate-related issues and renewables. None of the philanthropic funding highlighted by OCJC has gone into extraction and exploration research. Rather, it has been used to widen access to education and to fund scholarships, academic posts and capital costs. The proportion of research funding going into fossil fuel exploration and extraction has declined significantly over the last decade, whilst the percentage going into renewables projects has increased.”

Image: Roy Luck/CC BY 2.0 via flickr.com

License to Grill

0

As the plant based revolution continues, the most recent cuisine to be veganised is an eagerly awaited summer highlight that makes for a perfect social event. Whether it’s at a park, on a beach, or even on a college-provided grill, there’s nothing like watching sizzling coals of the barbecue in the warm sunshine (safely, of course). Move over meat eaters, because this summer, vegetarians and vegans have a license to grill.

Meat has long hogged the barbecue, with the slow cooking tradition holding great significance to the African-American community (highlighted in the recent Netflix show “High on the Hog”), and many other countries have their own versions of open fire cooking – think tandoori, Mexican grill, or kebabs. While grilled meat has long been appreciated by people around the globe, the growing popularity of meat replacements is reflected in UK supermarkets. Tesco’s “Wicked” brand recently launched vegan skewers, made with pea protein, as have the expanding “THIS” range, and with vegan halloumi and burger alternatives on offer too, you can be sure that there’ll be no more plates piled high with salad for non-meat eaters. 

That’s not to say that salads, or any vegetables, need be neglected this summer: MOB Kitchen’s Peri Peri Sweet Potato salad is a perfect example of a spruced up, flavourful side dish. With roasted sweet potatoes with a herby kick, fresh celery, peppers, sweetcorn, tomato and coriander, this salad is balanced and will definitely complement a PB-BBQ. A grilled peach salad with crumbly cheese and rocket, or something more citrussy can be a great way to add acidity, sweetness, or some of your 5 a day into a barbecue too. You can even spice up a corn on the cob with Peri Peri seasoning, or make a “Masala Corn” in the style of Indian street food, with butter (or alternative), chilli powder, honey and lemon juice. 

Homemade vegetable skewers are a classic, but can seem bland or boring if they’re not done right. Seasoning your veggies with olive oil, salt and pepper before they hit the coals is imperative – and mix up the flavours too! Try oregano and lemon juice on diced aubergines, courgettes and peppers for a Mediterranean skewer, or slather miso paste on slices of onion for an Ottolenghi-inspired umami sensation. Add cayenne or chilli powder for a bit of spiciness, with an extra squeeze of lemon once they’re cooked to give the spices a facelift.

Marinating might seem like a lot of effort with little reward, but it can actually reduce the amount of work you have to do once the grill or barbeque is on. For vegetarians, this is the trick you need for soft and delicious paneer tikka, and can be replicated with tofu. Marinades are essentially layers of flavour, they need at least 6 hours in the fridge to sink in so that delicate spices aren’t overpowered by smokiness from the grill. 

A popular marinade in North India is Hariyali – literally meaning ‘green’, because of the fresh herbs it includes. Start by cubing 400g of your paneer or tofu, then add 4 tbsp of ginger and garlic paste, followed by 2 tsp of turmeric powder – this is the first marinade. Cover this, and let it sit for 10 minutes. Then add the juice of one lime, and let it sit for another 10 minutes. In this time, use a blender to prepare the third marinade, consisting of 2 handfuls of cashew nuts, 6 tbsp of plain yoghurt (dairy free is fine!), 1 cup each of fresh mint and coriander, 2 tsp of cumin seeds or powder, 1 tsp cinnamon, 1 tbsp poppy seeds, a few cardamoms and chillies, plus a pinch salt and pepper. Feel free to taste the marinade to check if it needs adjusting – it should be fairly hot.  Finally, add the thoroughly blended bright green mix to your paneer or tofu, before refrigerating it for at least 6 hours. This marinade will be worth the effort when you taste the flavour it imparts!

Lots of the new veggie and vegan options for a barbecue are sure to be popular with meat eaters too, but if you’re someone whose diet has long been ignored at these summer celebrations, this year might just be your chance to hog the best options on the grill.

Published in print on 09/06/2021

The Return of Formals

0

For many colleges, formals are finally back on the menu. Whether that means donning your gown for the first time in a year, or a more relaxed opportunity to enjoy hall food without plastic screens muting any hopes of a conversation, the return to inside dining has been much awaited by many. For many freshers, this term offers the prospect of their first formals ever – and with it, the promise of a normal student experience, though it may well feel overdue. So, although some college chefs have kept us entertained over lockdowns with Instagram posts and student-friendly recipes, their time has come to shine and plate up Masterchef-worthy creations for halls filled with hungry students who have been eagerly waiting for their chance to be a food critic.

Last Friday, I attended my college’s first formal of Trinity and was overwhelmed with nostalgia as I filed into the hall with the 49 other lucky ticket holders. I felt as though I’d won a golden ticket, though I’d have to wait until dessert for a taste of dreamy chocolate. The familiar sight of candlesticks sitting side by side with the cheapest bottles of Pinot Grigio made me grin from ear to ear; after a long stretch of unfulfilling student experience, going back to normal is like clouds parting to reveal sunshine. Even given the variance in hall food prices, it does feel like a real privilege that a hallmark of the Oxford experience is a three-course meal for about a fiver – impossible to forget as I marvelled at the starter of whipped goats cheese, beetroot, and pickled fennel salad, served with the well-loved bread and butter and a slice of toasted ciabatta.

For mains, the omnivores among us were served a slow cooked lamb shank, tender enough to slide off the bone, while vegetarians such as myself received an eggplant steak with a scored king oyster mushroom. I particularly loved the use of mushroom on the aubergine, it lent it an umami earthiness and slightly beefy flavour to the otherwise wholly vegetable based dish. Served with crushed new potatoes, seasonal veg and herby jus, both of these options were really popular- the food lived up to the high standards we had set for our first formal back in college. In the last few years, many restaurants and takeaways have upped their veggie and vegan game as a result of skyrocketing demand for plant-based alternatives. This trend seems to have extended to college kitchens too, as this was undoubtedly the best vegetarian (and vegan friendly) meal I’ve been served in hall. Each dish had an almost identical vegan counterpart, so rejoice vegans, at the end of boring salads and fruit plates!

As someone with a certified sweet tooth, I’d been looking forward to the dessert from the moment I walked into the hall – although I cook a fair amount of my own food, the precision and luxury of formal hall desserts remain firmly out of my territory, and always feel like a real treat. We were served a blackcurrant and raspberry chocolate bar, filled with mousse, alongside a scoop of fresh raspberry sorbet. The perfect combination of sweetness and tartness rounded off my first formal of Trinity term and reminded me of all the good yet to come, despite the sour bits of the pandemic we’re all keen to leave behind.

All in all, my first formal of 2021 was a great experience, leaving me feeling grateful to have been back in hall surrounded by friends, and far from the desk at which I ate most of my meals during virtual Trinity. The menu was thoughtfully curated, making use of seasonal and local produce, and it was clear that the vegetarian and vegan alternatives were given just as much consideration. I’ll definitely be trying to grab a ticket for the next formal at my college – and I’d recommend you do the same!

Published in print on 26/05/2021

Hanging by a Thread: Fragility and Femininity in the Work of Nensi Dojaka and Rui

0

The LVMH Prize for Young Fashion Designers was launched in 2013 with the aim of seeking out and fostering emerging talent within the fashion world. Each year, the winner receives  €300,000 and mentorship from LVMH and the runner-up (or winner of the Karl Lagerfeld/Special Jury Prize) also benefits from this mentorship, as well as a grant of €150,000. With this incomparable support, winners consistently graduate from the realm of ‘up-and-coming’ to fully established and revered designers. This is evidenced in the success of past winners such as Jacquemus and Marques’Almeida which now have their shows sandwiched between century-old houses at fashion week.

Before the winners are announced, however, a short-list of finalists is released. Within the group of the 2021 finalists, we find Nensi Dojaka and RUI. Nensi Dojaka is a designer from Albania and based in London. Having graduated from Central Saint Martins, she was swept up by Ssense, producing a capsule collection with them in 2019. She has recently finished a stint with the so-called ‘talent incubator’ Fashion East. Rui Zhou, the designer behind the eponymous brand RUI, describes herself as from “a small city surrounded by mountains and trees in China”. She now works in Shanghai, having studied at the Tsinghua University, Beijing and Parsons, New York. Although the background and education of these two designers are contrasting, their works similarly challenge the rules of womenswear and create new definitions of femininity.

Speaking to the LVMH panel, Rui described the aesthetic of her brand as “based on the relationship in between fragility and strength” and this definition could equally be applied to Nensi Dojaka’s work. In the latter’s garments, this fragility is created by the straps which hold the pieces together. The concept of the strappy little black dress is taken to its extreme, as she criss-crosses thread-like straps (too slight to be called ‘spaghetti’) which precariously hold up the main body of the item. From this precariousness arises a provocativeness as it seems that the garment could snap at any moment. As the wearer can be confident that the structure of the item is not as delicate as it appears, this endows them with a secret strength which raises them above any viewer who dares to think that they will see more. This effect is also achieved by Rui’s pieces which consist of star-like panels of fabric held together by tenuous links adorned with crystals or beads. The placement of this adornment visually symbolises the beauty of this fragility, but also physically strengthens the most delicate parts of the garment, thus representing the designer’s vision of fragility and strength existing in harmony.

The shapes which arise from the structure of these pieces hint towards a playfulness within this new vision of femininity and this partly derives from the use of asymmetry in the work of both these designers. In some of Nensi Dojaka’s most recognisable pieces, she connects the straps in such a way that the panels of fabric sit at wonky angles. This adds to the provocative nature of the garment through making the function of the structure seem even more miraculous. In other pieces, she stays strictly symmetrical, but a playfulness is maintained through intricate layering. For example, in one of her bodysuits, three layers of sheer fabric are placed on top of each other to form a bra. As the transparency of this fabric is lost through this layering, an element of modesty is born out of the sensuality and this ties into the symbiosis of fragility and strength.

Rui Zhao similarly experiments with symmetry and asymmetry. In the symmetrical pieces, the shapes that are formed in the negative space of the fabric are perfectly circular, making the overall effect rather cute and fun, contrasting with the severity of the geometry in Nensi Dojaka. In others, spiky and asymmetric layers are chaotically intertwined as if the wearer has accidentally become tangled in a cobweb. As well as showing playfulness and experimentation, the construction of these shapes is a testament to the technical prowess of these designers.

It is easy to get wrapped up in the fragile technicality of these pieces, but one must remember that they are made to be worn. Nensi Dojaka and Rui Zhao did not forget this. Their radical femininity is reflected in the way that their clothes accentuate the body, wrapping themselves around the curves and contours of the figure. This flattering fit was not accidental and it is clear that the designs were created for real bodies rather than coat hangers. Nensi Dojaka uses adjustable straps which allow you to precisely fit the item exactly how you desire. Whereas adjusting the straps on a normal piece of clothing would change how high or low the garment fits on your body, the sheer number of adjustable straps on each item means that you can transform its whole appearance through playing with the endless permutations. Rather than using adjusting devices like Nensi Dojaka, the materials used for the RUI collections are inherently adjustable. This is because they are extremely stretchy, meaning that they change shape to fit whichever body they wrap themselves around. This is evidenced through the range of the bodies used in their campaigns which in itself points to an inclusivity in this femininity – it is not limited by the boundaries of gender or size, but willing to be embraced by all. The downside to these wonderfully stretchy fabrics is that they are thoroughly unsustainable (polyamide, nylon, spandex etc.), but Rui Zhou reassures the LVMH judges that sustainability is something she would focus on if she won the prize.

Unsurprisingly, I am not the only one who is obsessed with this new style of feminine dressing. It only takes a scroll down the Instagram accounts of these designers (@ruiofficial.me and  @nensidojaka) to see that celebrities have been lapping up their striking pieces. Emily Ratajkowski was recently pictured in a signature-style Nensi Dojaka minidress and other big names such as Bella Hadid, Emma Corrin had come before her. For her Rolling Stones cover, Dua Lipa was pictured in a RUI bodysuit, leggings and gloves and even the insta-famous ‘robot’ @lilmiquela has had a RUI top superimposed on her CGI body. When a robot is sporting your work, it surely means that you have captured the zeitgeist. This celebrity popularity does, however, betray a lack of accessibility to these clothes. RUI’s prices start at £180, and that is just for a single sleeve and the cult minidresses of Nensi Dojaka cost around the £800.  Perhaps this is reflective of where the designers are in their careers. Having won the LVMH prize, Grace Wales Bonner collaborated with Adidas allowing her to reach a different audience outside of the sphere of high-fashion and I wonder whether RUI and Nensi Dojaka could follow a similar trajectory. For the moment, we may just have to admire these clothes from a distance like works of art. Even if we cannot wear them ourselves, they are still able challenge our understanding of femininity and inspire us to find strength in fragility and to dress to reflect this.

Plans to restart greyhound racing in Oxford met with opposition

0

Oxford Vegan Action and animal rights charity PETA have expressed their opposition to restarting Greyhound racing at Oxford Stadium. Oxford Vegan Action have held in-person protests, while PETA have started a petition urging the Council to use the stadium for “sports that involve willing human participants”.

Oxford Vegan Action conducted peaceful demonstrations in Oxford City Centre in July, and invited people to also voice their opposition by writing to the Stadium owner. The activists highlighted the number of injuries and deaths of Greyhounds due to racing, stating that 1 in 3 dogs in the industry are injured, and 1 in 14 die (source: UK figures in 2017 from Greyhound Board of Britain). 

A protester colds a sign reading "4837 greyhounds injured within the industry (1 in 3)".
Image: Oxford Vegan Action
A women holding a sign saying: "1013 GREYHOUNDS DIED WITHIN THE INDUSTRY (1 in 14)" and in small writing at the bottom "UK FIGURE IN 2017 FROM GREYHOUND BOARD OF GREAT BRITAIN"
Image: Oxford Vegan Action

A 2015 joint analysis by The Sunday Times and animal welfare campaigners found that 40,000 greyhounds have been injured on British racing tracks in the past decade, and that more than 18,000 of these did not race again.

Statistics on the effects of racing on Greyhound welfare differ according to sources and measurements. The British Greyhound regulator only records those injuries noted directly after the race, while other animal welfare campaigns include long-run effects. Long-run health effects of Greyhound Racing include behavioral problems and trauma, making it hard to find homes for dogs, and unhealthy bone structure due to the curved tracks.

The animal rights charity PETA also criticizes the use of doping drugs on Greyhounds. Drugs used include morphine to reduce perception of pain from injury, steroids, and class A drugs like cocaine. The Greyhound Board of Great Britain has published hundreds of positive drug tests since 2009, says greyhound advocacy group GREY2K USA.

Oxford Stadium closed in late 2012 due to financial difficulties, with Greyhound racing seen as a declining industry. UK attendance decreased from 3.2 million spectators in 2006 to 2 million in 2014, and the number of licensed tracks decreased by 25% from 2006 to 2021. 

Successful campaigning by Save Our Stadium and the City Council stopped the stadium from being demolished back in 2012. In June 2021, more than 8 years later, racing track manager Kevin Boothby acquired a ten-year lease for the Stadium. He plans to reopen it for Greyhound racing this December.

Kevin Boothby told Cherwell: “We have been overwhelmed and delighted by the positive response from local people, families and businesses about the return of greyhound racing to Oxford. As the country’s sixth most popular spectator sport, greyhound racing is enjoyed by people from all ages and all walks of life. We look forward to opening our doors and welcoming local people from across the local area and beyond.

“Greyhound welfare is at the very heart of our sport and there are strict rules and regulations in place to ensure greyhounds are well cared for throughout their racing careers. Racing injuries are at an all-time low and more retired dogs than ever are going onto loving forever homes.”

Regarding the maintenance of the stadium, Oxford City Council told Cherwell: “The Council was clear in the adopted Local Plan Policy SP51 that we wanted to ensure that the site was kept for community and leisure use. We will want to be confident that the operator will be committed to ensuring this is a long term proposal delivering a high quality and accessible venue as well as delivering jobs and training to the local community. We will look forward to working with Galliard Homes to achieve this.”

This article was updated on July 30th to include comments from Mr Boothby and Oxford City Council.

Image: Oxford Vegan Action

Review- In the Heights

0

“No pare, sigue, sigue” (a Spanish aphorism which translates as “don’t stop, keep going, keep going”) is a particularly catchy recurring motif from the score of Lin-Manuel Miranda’s 2005 debut musical In the Heights. It is this indefatigably optimistic spirit which defines both the stage musical and Jon M. Chu’s recent film adaptation. Originally slated for release in the summer of 2020, In the Heights instead provides ebullient viewing as the first film many of us have seen on the big screen since cinemas closed their doors. A celebration of the power of families and local communities and of the possibility of sueñitos (“little dreams”) coming true even in the most adverse of circumstances, it is the perfect antidote to a year in lockdown.

The film focusses on the hopes and dreams of an ensemble cast living in Upper Manhattan’s majority-Latinx Washington Heights neighbourhood. Anthony Ramos’ charismatic protagonist-narrator Usnavi and his love interest Vanessa (Melissa Barrera) both dream of moving away from their neighbourhood as it rapidly becomes gentrified – Vanessa to a downtown apartment and a fashion career, Usnavi to his deceased parents’ home in the Dominican Republic – while Nina (Leslie Grace) struggles with financial pressure and racial microaggressions at Stanford University. These underlying tensions come to fruition alongside the revelation that someone in the community has bought a winning lottery ticket, and climax during a neighbourhood power outage.

This subject matter has the potential to feel small-scale and everyday, especially in comparison to Miranda’s later historical epic Hamilton. However, like many great movie musicals, In the Heights employs music, dance and theatricality in a way that elevates these mundane concerns to matters of world-changing importance. The eponymous opening number, which posits Usnavi’s bodega as the spiritual centre of the neighbourhood and casts Ramos as a deeply convincing “boy next door”, lends an almost mythical quality to Washington Heights. This quality is enhanced with the slightly corny yet effective framing device which positions the entire film as a story read by Usnavi to his future children on the Caribbean island of his dreams. Cinematographer Alice Brooks’ occasional use of fantastical elements – a feature which is often liable to ward sceptics away from the movie musical genre – is also effective in granting mythological proportions to a domestic tale. The use of graffiti imagery “spray-painted” in the air by the male leads at the start of ‘96,000’ (a childlike visualisation of the characters’ dreams of what they would spend their lottery money on) sticks especially in the mind.

Musical theatre as a genre has always excelled at walking the fine line between telling the stories of esoteric communities – the shtetl of Fiddler on the Roof, for example, a musical Miranda has cited as an important influence for Heights – and extracting messages from these stories which can resonate with more diverse audiences. Heights similarly tempers universal observations about the power of family and community with a deep affection specifically for the cultures of the Latinx diaspora in New York. Chu’s direction on the blockbuster numbers is unafraid to move the camera away from the dance sequences and let it linger on mouthwatering pernil and arroz con pollo being prepared, or on the impressive acrylic nails and platform shoes of the neighbourhood salon owners — the cinematic equivalent of Abuela Claudia’s (Olga Merediz) mantra that Latinos should “assert dignity in small ways”. 

As a longtime fan of the original musical’s cast album, I may risk slipping into pedantry by critiquing the ways in which the plot of Heights was changed on its journey from stage to screen. Nevertheless, the extent to which Nina and Benny’s love story was sidelined in the film is regrettable, especially given how it addressed the uneasy racial dynamic between Benny, the only non-Latinx lead character, and Nina’s disapproving father. The removal of certain key songs, especially ‘Sunrise’, the intimate Act Two opener performed the morning after Nina and Benny’s first night together, led to the development of their love story feeling rushed in comparison to that of Usnavi and Vanessa. Admittedly, some of the screen time gained with the reduction of Benny and Nina’s storyline was used to explore the status of Usnavi’s cousin Sonny (Gregory Diaz IV) as an undocumented immigrant. However, this was a minor subplot at best, and thus felt like a noble but underdeveloped attempt to update the musical with references to issues relevant to America in 2021, at the expense of the storylines which made the original special.

Despite these misguided alterations, Heights is unafraid to experiment with the flexibility of the movie musical format, and consequently never falls into the trap of feeling like a filmed stage production. This experimentation is employed most effectively in Abuela Claudia’s moving autobiographical solo number ‘Paciencia y Fe’. While in the stage musical this was a simple sung soliloquy about an elderly Cuban immigrant, the film version is one of Chu’s most boundary-pushing moments as a director. In contrast to the colours and vibrancy of the other musical set pieces, ‘Paciencia y Fe’ takes place in a dreamlike version of the New York subway, and positions Abuela Claudia trapped in a subway carriage and alone in a crowd of ghostly interpretative dancers, seemingly representing the different pressures and anxieties described in the song’s lyrics.  During two other emotionally resonant numbers, Nina and Vanessa’s solos ‘Breathe’ and ‘It Won’t Be Long Now’, Chu and Brooks are unafraid to use dream sequences — an apparition of Nina’s younger self, Vanessa’s desperate run down a busy avenue — to transfer the emotional weight of songs written for the stage to a specifically cinematic context. Though In the Heights’ willingness to play with the structure and staging of the original musical has its shortcomings, it demonstrates a fearlessness which sets it apart from more straightforward stage-to-screen adaptations.

Given Miranda and Chu’s much-stated desire to use In the Heights to amplify underrepresented voices in Hollywood, in the vein of Black Panther or Chu’s Crazy Rich Asians, it would be remiss not to mention the controversy surrounding the lack of Afro-Latinx representation in the film. According to the most recent American Community Survey, 59.29% of the population of Washington Heights identified as non-white. While this diversity is represented to an extent by the casting of Leslie Grace and by an ensemble largely made up of people of colour, it is still troubling that all of the other leads were played by white or white-passing Latinx performers. After several detailed critiques from Afro-Latinx writers, Miranda did offer a heartfelt apology for the limited representation of his community.

Nonetheless, concerning comments continued to be made by cast members such as Barrera about how the light-skinned lead actors were selected because they “embodied each character in the [sic] fullest extent”, implying that the characters were never written with anyone other than a light-skinned performer in mind. Though In the Heights’ goal as a piece of Latinx representation is laudable and perhaps unachievable given the size and diversity of the Latinx diaspora in the US, its shortcomings may prove to be a lesson to future filmmakers telling the stories of underrepresented communities.

Despite these questionable choices and serious missteps, In the Heights shines a spotlight on communities whose stories deserve to be told. It provides a much-needed reminder of the importance of optimism, family, and the unique power of the movie musical, and one could definitely do worse when finding a suitable film for their first post-lockdown cinema trip.

In the Heights is in cinemas now. 

Most teaching will be in-person, Oxford University plans

0

Oxford University has announced they are planning that most teaching in the new academic year will be delivered in-person.

In a newsletter sent to students, the Pro-Vice-Chancellor for Education Chair of the Conference of Colleges confirmed the move, adding that teaching will be “enhanced by high-quality online resources” and possibly “online teaching”.

A variety of assessment types, both online and in-person, will be offered depending on the courses. The newsletter told students they will find out how their course will be assessed at the start of the academic year.

The University has contingency plans in place if Government restrictions are re-introduced, or cases in Oxford rise to a high enough level. These could involve moving more teaching online. “Decisions will be made based on the level of local cases in the Oxford area and the prevailing health advice in the run-up to the start of term,” the email continued.

The University hopes that “as many students as possible” will start Michaelmas term in-person in Oxford. However, that travel restrictions may mean some international students will be unable to arrive at the start of term. In recognition of this, residency exemptions will be in place for students from regions on the UK Government’s Red List. Information on the support available to students quarantining after arriving from Amber List countries can be found here.

Health measures currently in place at the University will remain in place at the moment. However, the newsletter said they would be “kept under review”.

The newsletter says that a “fuller update” containing more details about teaching and health measures may be available in early September.

Students are advised to check the webpage for offer holders and returning students, or contact their department for further information.

Image: CC0 1.0 via Max Pixel