Saturday 18th July 2026
Blog Page 470

Shoulda put a ring on it: rings as a form of self-expression

0

Rings: the often simple form of circular jewellery typically worn on one’s fingers, have a long history. Examples of rings have been found dating back to before 2000BC, and over their 4000 year history they have found their place as a versatile accessory, suitable for anyone and any occasion. 

Yet to this day, there exists a lengthy list of regulations surrounding rings. From traditions on the proper jewellery to wear, to rules on how you should wear them, and most importantly, specifics on how they should be styled. Some rules are more general, applying to jewellery as a whole, whilst others apply specifically to the world of rings. The most prevalent example are the traditions surrounding wedding rings and bands. In the UK, the wedding ring is traditionally worn on the ring finger of the left hand. Engagement rings have been historically reserved for women, and after the wedding the engagement ring is worn together with the wedding ring on the same finger. Diamond rings were also seen as only for women.  

However, in recent years rings have for many people become the ultimate form of self-expression despite these rules and traditions. Wedding rings and engagement rings are becoming less popular among the younger generations as their ideas about marriage and relationships change. For those that opt for them, they often avoid the flashier options. The now wide-spread knowledge of the use of conflict minerals in high-end jewellery, particularly diamonds, alongside the economic realities faced by young couples have led to more understated choices. A higher proportion of men are wearing engagement rings and at the same time, more and more couples are opting to ditch engagement rings all together, particularly given the problematic gender dynamic involved with them. 

These changes are not limited to wedding rings. With the release of La Manso’s most recent collection of rings, there is a focus on plastic rings in bright colours. This demonstrates a distinct change from traditional rings utilising metal, and the association that rings, and jewellery in general, should only be stylised as ‘luxury’. These rings provide a unique fashion statement, a clear marker of one’s own style. They also represent a move away from more problematic usages of fast fashion to buy cheaper metal jewellery, as well as from conflict minerals in more expensive pieces. Changes in gender norms have also changed the ring market, with men increasingly using rings as a form of self expression outside of the traditional wedding band or signet ring. As seen in many celebrity looks, men have adopted rings in a wide-array of styles, some opting for more minimalist looks, whilst others stack rings or choose to flex heavily jewelled pieces. 

Stacking rings, whilst not a new idea, having been popular across Europe for both men and women in the Middle-Ages, marks the pinnacle of rule-breaking self-expression when it comes to jewellery. As such, it is an extremely popular look at the moment and is surprisingly easy to pull off. The choices made when stacking rings say a lot about the wearer, whether deliberate or not. Stacking rings allows for simpler pieces to be elevated and older pieces to be reused; one is able to mix metals, different coloured jewels, and combine high and low-end pieces to form their own unique look – expressing all the wearer wants to say with just their hands.

The choices made by all genders in creating such looks are able to function as a form of self-expression never seen before. Beneath the beauty of the rings themselves, you are able to read deeply into the wearer’s personality and sense of style as you understand how they choose to break the rules and depart from traditions.

PhysPhil students receive results 101 days after exams end

0

Since their last exam on October 16, it took until this Monday for Physics and Philosophy (commonly abbreviated to PhysPhil) students to receive results. The cohort, now in their fourth and final year, have had to apply to jobs and graduate studies with only second-year results.

In June of 2020, PhysPhil students sat the philosophy component of their exams. There is only one paper unique to the PhysPhil degree; all others that PhysPhil students may have taken were offered to philosophy students across degrees. Finalists for degrees such as PPE received their exam results in July, but PhysPhil students received no results – even for papers they had in common with other courses.

The physics exams were held in 0th and 1st week of Michaelmas 2020, ending on October 16. Physics students received their results two weeks ago, but results were again withheld from PhysPhil students.

On November 25, the Department of Physics told PhysPhil students: “The examiners acutely understand that students (and their tutors) require the examination results to be published – the examiners are doing all they can to make this happen as soon as possible. The results will be published when they are published.”

On December 4, another email to students stated: “There is no past experience for Michaelmas Term Physics examinations, rather this is in addition to a normal busy Michaelmas Term. It is therefore regrettable that we are unable to provide a definitive date for the publication of examination results, even a worst-case date. All colleagues involved in the examining process are doing all they can to make this happen as soon as they can.”

On January 15, after being asked for a date for the examiner’s meeting or an idea of when results would be given, the brief response was: “There are no updates”.

Then, on January 25, results were released, with no accompanying explanation for the delay.

A PhysPhil student told Cherwell: “The situation is ridiculous: even accounting for the pandemic, the reason it took over two weeks longer than the physicists to get results is because of exams we did six months ago. The complete lack of communication from a PhysPhil authority, with no acknowledgement, apology or explanation for the delay and no message whatsoever on when we could expect results, strongly suggests that students’ interests weren’t a priority. The inability to contact examiners directly without serious consequences made it impossible to hold them accountable to any sort of reasonable deadline. This not only disadvantaged us when applying for further study or jobs, but also adversely affected students’ mental health in an already difficult time.”

One student is planning on filing a complaint with the departments.

The Physics Faculty told Cherwell “Results for the MPhysPhil degree have been published.

While there is overlap in content as regards physics, to release results for a joint school involves additional steps. This is more apparent when operating within the current environment and the restrictions that that brings with it.

Regarding Ph.D applications, tutor references play a very important part and tutors are usually in a very good position to give assessments of a candidate’s ability and performance. Students concerned on this front are advised to speak to their college tutors.

We are sorry to hear that some students feel that their interests are not a priority and we would like to give assurance that this is absolutely not the case. Staff are working very hard, having to balance workload with additional strain imposed by Covid-related matters (childcare, home schooling, working remotely). The PJCC [Physics Joint Consultative  Committee, consisting of both Physics and a Physics & Philosophy student representatives] has a good understanding of the situation and students may, as always, use that channel to obtain advice or gain reassurance about their degree course. Students who feel that their mental health has been affected are advised, again, to speak with their college tutor, or otherwise to make contact with the welfare networks in college.”

The University has been contacted for comment.

Dire wolves: not just in the fantasy world of Game of Thrones

0

Dire wolves were real creatures, not just created from the mind of George R.R. Martin. They, alongside a range of massive creatures known as megafauna, disappeared from America in a mass extinction during the Pleistocene Period.

However, a research project involving Oxford archaeologists as part of a near 50-strong team have uncovered further information about this extinct species: enough information to successfully sequence the DNA of a dire wolf.  

Professor Greger Larson, Director of the Palaeogenomics and Bio-Archaeology Research Network and one of the academics involved in this project, told Cherwell: “There were a lot of unanswered questions about dire wolves and we wanted to see if we could apply an ancient DNA approach to generate Dire Wolf DNA to answer those questions.”

Dozens of remains of dire wolves were located and examined with limited success. Yet the close collaboration of this global academic team was able to generate partial genomes from five specimens in the US.

Nuclear DNA testing established that they had evolved separately from other canids. The study found no indication of matings between dire wolves and other canid species, which could be a reason why they went extinct and other North American canids, such as wolves, survived the extinction.

In response to a further inquiry into what the next stages of this research might look like, Professor Larson said: “Ideally we’d like to get a much better genome or two so that we can address questions about selection and population size and how the dire wolves responded to the changing climate at the end of the Pleistocene.”

In the announcement by the University of Oxford mentioned the idea of “a ‘Pleistocene Park’ of towering megafauna may one day be a possibility”. When questioned about this, Professor Larson said “Well, never say never. We can get DNA from dire wolves and we now know how closely they are related to modern canids so if cloning becomes a thing, maybe we can resurrect dire wolves.”

Professor Larson spoke of this collaboration as “a joy to be a part of”, especially with “so many young academics taking the lead”. Speaking further to Cherwell, he elaborated: “The past is a foreign country. The more we know about it the more we know about ourselves and the more empathy we can generate for each other and our planet. The more young scientists that are involved in these studies the greater the likelihood that science can continue to make the modern world a better place.”

New ICU unit planned for the John Radcliffe Hospital

0

Plans for a new intensive care unit in the John Radcliffe Hospital have been submitted. It would triple critical care capacity from 16 to 48 intensive care beds. This new capacity would also serve Buckinghamshire and West Berkshire.

The Oxford University Hospitals (OUH) NHS Trust believes the building is an “urgent requirement” as the John Radcliffe’s critical care unit is currently stretched by a large number of patients ill with Covid-19. The trust told the BBC a new unit would “support further pandemic and seasonal pressures” and “given the nature of the pandemic, the increase in critical care capacity must happen at speed”.

The OUH NHS Trust have said they are facing double the number of patients ill with Covid-19 than in the country’s first wave. The John Radcliffe Hospital are dealing with a large number of patients ill with Covid-19 in intensive care, mounting pressure on staff and the hospital’s services. This has forced the trust to cancel all non-essential surgery.

Oxford are facing a high number of coronavirus cases with rates at 531.1 per 100,000, higher than the national rate of 520.4 per 100,000 as of 18th January. Pressure on Oxford’s hospitals has increased, which in turn has created a shortage of intensive care beds. 

A new ICU would include 32 more intensive care beds set out in a “race-track” formation. This layout, used in many world-class critical care units, places nursing in a central area with hospital beds around the ward’s perimeter. It increases patient visibility to staff and facilitates their movement around the unit. The new formation intends to optimise natural light on patients.

The plans also involve demolishing the existing Barnes Care Unit in a 5-story building connected to the central hospital.

Credit Image: Jackie Bowman/CC BY-SA 2.0.

So long, farewell: the UK’s decision to leave Erasmus

0

On Christmas Eve of 2020, it was decided that students and young people from Britain will no longer take part in the Europe-wide Erasmus exchange programme, following the UK’s departure from the European Union.  It’s a sad loss, but let’s face it, an expected one. The replacement: the Turing scheme, ostentatiously unveiled as an opportunity whereby UK students can have their ‘pick of the world’, and travel to countries beyond Europe.

The main reason cited for leaving the scheme is financial. The Erasmus Programme, which was established in 1987 and named after the Dutch humanist philosopher, was deemed ‘too expensive’ by Boris Johnson in negotiation talks prior to the new year. The Turing scheme, in the words of Education Secretary Gavin Williamson, will instead ‘deliver real value for money’ and focus on being ‘truly international.’

While Erasmus membership was certainly costly, reports have shown that leaving the partnership deal will blow a hole in the UK economy. ‘Inbound exchange students contributed £440m to the UK in 2018,’ pointed out Vivienne Stern, Director of Universities UK International. ‘There are real concerns as to how the UK will replace that.’ The £100m that has been flung at the Turing scheme may sound impressive, but by comparison, is a paltry investment in young people’s futures. Nor does it solve the problem of sponsoring travel far beyond Europe, when flights have always been covered by students themselves. How will young people afford the fee to fly to Australia, for example, compared to the more manageable cost to travel to Rotterdam? Like a parent disguising a plate of vegetables as a dessert, Johnson desperately promises, in true Trumpian fashion, a ‘bigger and better’ programme. See previous claims on a ‘world-beating’ track and trace scheme, if you need reminding of how boasts work out in this government. 

The greatest loss, however, has never been concerned with money. 17,000 British young people will be deprived of valuable work and life experience, according to a group of education and business leaders. Living abroad, working in a new environment, appreciating the language and culture of a different country – each of these are invaluable in their own right. How lucky we were to have access to a programme that brought all of these together, opportunities otherwise out of reach to low-income students. Bursaries from Erasmus made such experiences possible: small worlds made big; confidence made even bigger.

No doubt will Erasmus’ opponents defend the decision by framing it as a ‘gap yah’ holiday for the privileged few. Really, however, it has opened doors for those who would never be able to open them. A report published last year found that BAME students who studied abroad were 17% more likely to be in graduate jobs six months after graduation. For a portion of the population who were never able to vote on this decision to leave Erasmus, let alone in the EU referendum itself, the outcome is more than frustrating. And it comes a whole three years after Michael Gove’s declaration that May’s Brexit deal would see ‘the final whistle blown, and the prime minister having won.’ Gove would be proven incorrect timewise, but the analogy still speaks volumes – young people have been caught amid this public-school boy football match in which the main players seem to only be scoring own goals.

I never got to benefit from the Erasmus programme, but the effect of living abroad as a young person is not lost on me. Taking French and Spanish for A level, I spent a week in Madrid and Montpellier to attend language schools. It was my first time away from home and navigating a foreign city was hard, but I will treasure the memories and friendships made there all my life. It was a gift. Students there, from across Europe, were inquisitive.

Brexit was often brought up in our first conversations. ‘But none of us want to lose you, either,’ a friend from Belgium pointed out, most likely after I’d lamented about our own losses. At first, it felt like a curiously undeserved kindness, but in retrospect it suggests more plainly what was undeserved for them – a ‘referendum’ that ultimately gave no choice to a union of people just as implicated in the decision. A generation of those students I met, who also would want to visit a country and have an equally formative experience: to study in London, Liverpool; to enjoy the quirks and delights of a country that I have long since forgotten. None of us want to lose you either.  It’s a comment that has stayed with me, but feels particularly resonant now that those friends will struggle to find funded places at UK universities. Up our fences go, as if our nation could not already be more insular.

Perhaps hypocrisy is only to be expected here, but it’s still difficult not to feel hard done by. The prime minister told MPs in January that there was ‘no threat to the Erasmus scheme and we will continue to participate in it.’ It hasn’t taken long – at all – for people to show their anger over this broken promise. SNP MP Douglas Chapman accused the prime minister of ‘lies and bluster’, following on the words of his party’s leader, Nicola Sturgeon, who said that such a decision would be ‘cultural vandalism.’ Labour’s shadow education secretary, Kate Green, said that pulling out of the scheme was ‘needless.’ Needless for everyone but the self-serving, of course. Johnson himself is notably fluent in Italian and French. The latter he most likely picked up during his stint as the Brussels correspondent for The Telegraph, where he was able to work abroad as a young journalist (and spread anti-EU stories, even then). The irony is clear enough to anyone.

It is tricky to express grief over something you’ve never had, especially when the Erasmus Programme is small fry in comparison to trade deals and fishing agreements. But make no mistake in dismissing this decision, which seems to be the greatest revenge of the Tories yet: the blinding of future generations to the beauty and life of European cities abroad.

‘Ah, bitter chill it was!’: John Keats, the winter Romantic

0

Unlike Agatha Christie adaptations or reruns of Doc Marten from 2009, the works of a 19th century Romantic poet seem an unlikely match with the dreary winter months. Rather, the mainstream approach is to view the Romantics through the lens of an eternal summer. The movement’s cornerstone ideology appraises nature, growth, and the freedom of roaming the Great Outdoors. Yet reading the Romantics with such a limited seasonal perspective denies them the complexity their work begs. If anything, the bitter British winter was a source of great inspiration for some Romantics, hardly a period to be discarded as a fruitless literary realm. If we simply read the Romantics as summer poets, we limit their work to a one-season run of flowers, lutes, and half-naked women, disconcertingly like the sole lucky break of many one-hit-wonder indie bands. So to what extent can we really read the Romantics as winter poets? Or would it be better to leave them frolicking in meadows as traditional opinion would prefer?

One of the clearest examples of a winter Romantic is one of the most contemplative and melancholic of Romantic figures, John Keats. At the time considered inferior to his more famous contemporaries in both literary and social status, Keats offered a new approach to the movement that shocked and abhorred peers. Lord Byron, a figurehead of the era not known for his subtlety, once declared that Keats wrote ‘piss a bed poetry’. Nowadays, however, it is common to group Keats neatly with Romantic contemporaries. Poems like ‘Bright Star, would I were as steadfast as thou art’ are indeed consistent with the Romantic reverence for the ‘eternal […] priestlike’ elements of nature. In addition, works such as ‘O Solitude! If I must with thee dwell’ condemn the ‘jumbled heap’ of Keats’ industrial world with appropriate Rousseauian distain. In Keats’ arguably most famous poem, ‘Ode to a Nightingale’, images of ‘beechen green’, ‘embalmèd air’ and ‘fruit-tree wild’ align neatly with the general concept of the Romantics as summer poets. Summer is found not only in Keatsian settings, but also in plot: ‘Ode to Psyche’ sees ‘two fair creatures […] calm-breathing on the bedded grass’, with ‘arms embraced’, echoed by the two-dimensional image represented in ‘Ode on a Grecian Urn’, describing the ‘fair youth, beneath the trees’. If so many of Keats’ central works coincide with the view of Romantics as summer poets, why does he remain one of the best examples of the counterargument? For this, it is necessary to take a closer look at some of Keats’ lesser discussed works.

‘The Eve of St Agnes’ is a wintery Keatsian masterpiece. This considerably hefty poem, spanning over forty stanzas, does not have the same position in the spotlight as ‘Ode to a Nightingale’ or, really, Keats’ odes in general. It is one of his more complex, darker pieces. It lacks the summertime brilliance of his simpler and shorter poems, drifting instead into the frosty realms of a medieval dream-state. Indeed, the same Romantic themes of passion and freedom from social constraints apply here. Keats also draws heavily, however, on unsettling winter images including ‘icy hoods and nails’ and ‘chill, silent as a tomb’, forging a dark and uncomfortable atmosphere only emphasised by ominous, seemingly deliberate over-employment of sibilance.

Rather saucily, this ‘bitter chill’ contrasts with, and thus emphasises, the heat of the passion experienced within Madeline’s ‘garlanded’ bedchamber later on in the poem. Lines such as ‘into her dream he melted, as the rose / blendeth its odour with the violet’ draw upon floral summer imagery, yet the reader is ever reminded of the ‘frost-wind’ outside. Keats’ references to the summer are only brief, dreamy escapes from the endurance of winter suffering. In this sense, Keats’ poem, though still maintaining the liminal state forever associated with Romanticism, maintains a gloomy and disturbing edge.

At times, Keats also toys with the sublime, another feature of the Romantics commonly seen in Wordsworth. This concept revolves around epic, awesome landscapes, encompassing the Romantic reverence for nature whilst often drawing on more isolated, wintery settings. ‘On The Sea’ (1817), one of Keats’ simplest poems inspired by the (rather less simple) Shakespeare tragedy, ‘King Lear’, is set amongst ‘desolate shores’, ‘caverns’ and ‘the winds of Heaven’. References to ‘the spell of Hecate’ and ‘sea nymphs’ provide the mythological surrealism often accompanying sublime writings.

Whether this winter dreariness is representative of Keats’ own melancholy is often discussed. In accordance with this argument, the concept of a ‘desolate shore’ appears in a later poem by Keats, ‘When I have Fears That I May Cease To Be’ (1818). In this later poem, Keats writes some of his best and most haunting lines: ‘on the shore /of the wide world, I stand alone, and think / till fame and love to nothingness do sink’. Hence, the wintery ‘shore’ becomes a place of alienation and contemplation existing side by side. Here, Keats could not be further from the flowery meadows we forever associate with the Romantics, existing instead on a darker, sadder plain, alone in the depths of winter. Not the cosiest of reads, but certainly crowning Keats a winter poet.

And so whilst some Keatsian works do embrace the endless summer in which we so love to imagine the Romantics, others prove that Keats has more to offer than cloudless skies. Looking at ‘The Eve of St Agnes’, among the other wintery works attributed to Keats, might be the answer to a fresh way of looking at the Romantics. If these next months feel dreary and dark, as they undoubtedly will as the struggle to vaccinate the vulnerable population continues, do seek solace in the strange, mysterious world of Romantics. Poets like Keats understood the dark depths of the British winter, and the human longing for the summer to come. And so as we knuckle down for some tough months ahead, put aside your fears and delve into a bit of Romanticism. Indeed, a bit of Keats will certainly remind you that whichever shore you stand upon, you certainly do not stand alone.


Image Credit: Culture Club/Getty Images.

Backstage takes centre stage: a look behind the scenes

Whether you have acted in the Olivier Theatre, or taken part in the school nativity, any actor will be oh too familiar with the organised chaos commonly referred to as ‘backstage’. The panicked cry of ‘where’s my prop?!’ five seconds before your cue, the frantic costume changes in the wings and the crippling fear of not being called for your scene are not only rights of passages but, in fact, an integral part to the production. Perhaps even an aspect that audience members rarely consider whilst sat happily in the stalls. Where would Cinderella be without her glass slipper? Could Romeo and Juliet have lived happily ever after if Romeo had been cued a bit late? Perhaps Lady Macbeth wouldn’t have felt quite so guilty if she hadn’t had time to apply that fake blood to her hands in-between scenes? It may be, that the seamless performance audience members witness onstage, is in fact, only the tip of an iceberg.

It all begins, of course, in the rehearsal room. After weeks of eyeing up your opponents during auditions, you are finally sat in an unusually dark room with a slightly damp smell; some feeling pretty chuffed with their solo and others less so with the role of Villager No. 2. It is at this point where the thought of being secure in your lines, standing on stage, in costume, seems like a faraway dream. At this precise moment, dodgy American accents are being polished and elaborate mimes for props you simply don’t have are being carried out with painful attention to detail. Meanwhile, the director is becoming increasingly stressed as cues are missed, lines are shaky and ‘NO-ONE. I REPEAT NO-ONE IS WHERE THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO BE!’ is screamed over a microphone.

The general feeling in the rehearsal room tends to be one of despair and doubt as to whether the show will ever be ready. The
famous phrase, ‘it’ll all be ok on the night’ does, however, always seem to pull through when you finally have something worthy of performance. It is at this moment that it becomes obvious just how important backstage is; it can quite simply carry the play or allow it to flop, making the phrase ‘break a leg’ cut a bit close to the bone.

That isn’t to say, however, that a few technical hiccups during a production don’t add to the charm and fun, both for actors and audience members. During one particularly memorable sixth form production of ‘A Christmas Carol’, a yoyo, which was crucial to the scene, was not in the coat pocket it was supposed to be in. This resulted in having to perform an overly detailed, ‘off the cuff’ mime of said yoyo in front of a live audience: great sport for them, rather humiliating for me. During another production of RSC’s ‘Wendy and Peter Pan’, an actor not being able to make it in time from the dressing room to the stage meant that drastic improvisation had to take place, resulting in the contents and length of the scene changing dramatically. I’m fairly confident that the audience didn’t notice, the actors onstage, however, most definitely did and, safe to say, the post show adrenaline levels in the dressing room were running much higher than usual.

Then there is the pre-show dressing room tension that every actor is craving during this latest lockdown. From the lost costumes and wardrobe malfunctions being sorted out last minute to the soundtrack of tongue twisters and scales being sung in the background. Meanwhile, seeing fellow castmates in their underwear no longer seems strange; in fact, no-one bats an eyelid. It is maybe these small moments that are most missed by actors during the pandemic, not the dramatic death scenes, or passionate declarations of love onstage, but the little trials and tribulations that go on in the wings which ultimately bring a cast closer together.

Ultimately, it doesn’t seem to be the centre stage limelight that actors are missing so much during lockdown, but rather the backstage community, the dressing room drama and panic in the wings that all contribute to the feel-good-feeling drama can achieve. It seems that now, more so than ever before, the show truly must go on in order to preserve this precious sense of ensembl

BREAKING: University confirms record-low 7 positive cases this week

0

The University has confirmed a record-low 7 cases of Covid-19 amongst staff and students from Early Alert Service tests for the 16th-22nd January, with a positivity rate of 6.8%. This marks an 84.4% decrease from last week’s 45 cases

This figure does not include the results from the Lateral Flow Tests that students have been encouraged to take upon returning to campus. 103 tests were administered by the University service in total this week, less than half the 222 administered the week prior. 

In Oxfordshire, cases have been decreasing. In the 7 days up to the 19th of January, Public Health England reported 24 positive cases in Oxford Central, 5 in North Central Oxford, and 36 cases in East Central Oxford. All of these areas have seen a decrease in cases.

Oxford study finds social media manipulation in all 81 countries surveyed

0

A report published by the Oxford Internet Institute (OII) has found evidence of organised social media manipulation campaigns in all 81 countries surveyed in 2020, a 15% increase compared to last year’s report. 

The study points to the rising influence of ‘cyber troops’. This refers to social media accounts that spread doctored images, use data-driven strategies to target specific sections of the population, troll political opponents, and mass-report opponents’ content so that it is reported as spam. These accounts can be either automated or human.

Facebook and Twitter revealed that they removed more than 317,000 accounts and pages from their platforms in a 22-month period (Jan 2019 to Nov 2020), but they are up against an industry that has become “professionalised, with private firms offering disinformation-for-hire services,” says Dr Samantha Bradshaw, a researcher at the OII. While social media companies were removing accounts, $10 million was spent around the world on cyber troop political advertising in the same timeframe and $60 million has been spent on private “strategic communications” firms since 2009. 

OII’s report found evidence of government agencies in 62 countries using computational propaganda for their own ends. Examples include China-backed cyber troops who continue to launch smear campaigns against Hong Kong Protestors and the Libyan National Army who have used social media to shape narratives about the ongoing civil war.

Of the 48% of countries with misinformation campaigns that drive division and polarization, the UK and the US were counted among them. In fact, the US and the UK both tested positive for interference from all five potential actors – government agencies, politicians & parties, private contractors, civil society organisations and citizens & influencers.

During the attack on the US Capitol on 6 January, fears of civil unrest caused by years of social media manipulation were harshly realised. “The day after the election, a group immediately pops up on Facebook called Stop the Steal,” says Sheera Frankel, cybersecurity reporter for the New York Times. “They’re gaining 100 new members every 10 seconds.” After Facebook and Twitter removed their pages, the group reconvened on Gab and Parler, platforms that allow individuals to say whatever they want without fear of moderation or censorship.

“Now, more than ever, the public needs to be able to rely on trustworthy information about government policy and activity,” said Professor Philip Howard, Director of the OII and co-author of the OII report. “Social media companies need to raise their game by increasing their efforts to flag misinformation and close fake accounts without the need for government intervention, so the public has access to high-quality information.”

Image Credit: Today Testing. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0

Oxford researchers accurately trace Covid-19 transmission through genomic epidemiology

0

Researchers from the Universities of Oxford and Edinburgh have recently published a comprehensive genomic analysis of the Covid-19 transmission. The full report was released on 8 January 2021, presenting detailed insights into the behaviour of Covid-19 transmission chains since the outbreak of the pandemic in the UK. 

The study is based on data from the first wave of the pandemic in early 2020, when the virus was first introduced into the region, and has found that the highest number of transmission chains had been introduced from Spain at 33%, France at 29%, and Italy at 12%. Transmission chains of the virus from China, meanwhile, accounted for only 0.4% of imports. 

The researchers drew on more than 50,000 virus genome sequences, in which 26,000 of these sequences were obtained from the Covid-19 Genomics UK (COG-UK) consortium. The results of the study offer a crucial context to what is happening now in the current wave of the pandemic in the UK. The same team have hence incorporated the genomic factor in identifying the latest variant (termed B.1.1.7) that is currently growing at rapid rates throughout the country. 

The team of scientists have suggested that a detailed comparison of the new variant’s behaviour with that of the first wave lineages will be crucial to understanding why the B.1.1.7 variant is spreading so quickly now. Before the March 2020 lockdown, high travel volumes and lax restrictions on international travel led to the circulation of more than 1,000 identifiable UK transmission lineages which had persisted into the summer of the same year. 

In a news article published by Oxford University, Professor Oliver Pybus, co-lead author based at Oxford’s Department of Zoology and the Oxford Martin School, said that by reconstructing where and when COVID-19 was introduced to the UK, we can see that earlier travel and quarantine interventions could have helped to reduce the acceleration and intensity of the UK’s first wave of cases. 

Another co-lead author, Louis du Plessis, also from Oxford’s Department of Zoology, added that the UK shares large volumes of virus genetic data publicly on a weekly basis, and that “if you don’t have this level of surveillance, you won’t know the real situation of virus evolution and transmission.” 

PhD researcher Verity Hill also emphasised that this form of continuous, nationally coordinated genomic sequencing allows for high-resolution analysis and for other countries to place their genomic data into context. This would enable countries to strategise a more effective pandemic response.

Image Credit: iSO-FORM LLC. Licence: CC BY 4.0