Saturday 19th July 2025
Blog Page 761

Shakira Martin re-elected as NUS president

0

Shakira Martin has been re-elected as president of the National Union of Students (NUS) in a landslide victory.

Martin won the contest in the first round with 50.9% of the vote beating Sahaya James and Momin Saqib at the annual NUS conference in Glasgow.

Martin was seen as a politically centrist candidate in the election and her victory appears to show the continued dominance of the centre in the NUS.

In her manifesto, she said: “When I was struggling I made a choice. I went back to college – a way back to work and independence and away from crime and abusive relationships.

“I want my daughters to realise the value of education – enabling them to be the leaders and entrepreneurs of the future.”

Her left-wing opponent, Sahaya James, who is a member of Momentum’s national executive, fared less well only achieving 15% of the vote.

Momin Saqib, the president of King’s College London (KCL) students’ union came second with 24.3% of the vote.

Martin’s election follows a period of controversy for the president. She was recently involved in accusations of bullying within in the NUS, which she denied.

Martin said: “I’m so humbled to have been re-elected”.

“I’m honestly shocked I ever made it here in the first place, and I’m so thankful to everyone in the student movement who has supported me,” she said.

“Now it’s time for our movement to get real on student issues, as well as to be honest about ourselves. I’m so excited to work with my next national officer team to create a truly united NUS, fit for tomorrow and fit for the future.”

Martin was first elected as NUS president last year and was previously the vice president for further education.

The election victory followed a tense day at the NUS conference with some delegates taking part in a sit-in on the stage over a motion supporting the decriminalisation of sex work.

Shazia Mirza: ‘I don’t think about the audience anymore. I just go ahead and do it.’

0

It is difficult to know where to begin when preparing questions for an individual as impressive as Shazia Mirza, in terms of her life experience – a Biochemistry graduate, she embarked on a teaching career in Dagenham, before becoming a journalist and comedian. Her output is prolific, with material ranging from extremism to body hair. More recently, she survived ‘Celebrity Island with Bear Grylls’, during which she memorably led fellow islanders to a water source. With such a list of reference points, what is her current show, ‘With Love from St Tropez’, about?

“I started to write this show in Edinburgh, but it’s changed since then. It’s really about the state of the world. Trump, Brexit, being on a beach in St Tropez, a bit about the Periodic Table.” We perhaps expect comedians in 2018 to fill their shows with zeitgeisty references to the topics dominating public discourse. Brexit, Trump, fake news – these are themes so monolithic, so demanding of a response from the arts, that audiences may be weary after months of exposure to wry political ruminations destined for perpetual re-runs on Dave. But Mirza built her reputation in the noughties, before we had such stringently politically engagé expectations of comics. Yet back then, an era now perceived by media outlets as a simpler time, Mirza’s work had an edge. Watching back clips of her stand-up from the period, her content has not become dated, cliché or uncomfortable to watch in the way that much noughties comedy now has. In an appearance at Winnipeg Comedy Festival in 2009, Mirza jokes about a US journalist asking her the serious question of whether she’d ever considered ‘being a suicide bomber’. “Well, if the comedy doesn’t work out…” is Mirza’s deadpan response.

Reviewers herald her subject matter as ‘brave’. The current climate is something of a gift, then, for a comic like Mirza. Yet, she tells me, referring to Trump and Brexit, “I’ve never spoken about these things before.” These themes “relate to everybody. It’s happening now.” We are watching a show developed in real-time.

I ask if there’s now a pressure to include the political material, where in the past it would seem natural for her to include. Mirza denies this, describing her writing process as determinedly ‘observational’. It is personal, almost organic. “I listen to people’s conversations.” She adds: “Women are in fashion, women’s marches. I think of all these ‘big’ topics and I think, I wonder what’s my point of view? Once I’ve got my point of view, then I can do jokes about it, because until you know what you think about something, you can’t really be clear about doing jokes…I don’t think about the audience anymore, actually,” she reveals. “I just go ahead and do it.”

This fearlessness was reflected in her last stand-up tour, ‘The Kardashians Made Me Do It’. Disappointingly for many, this show was not primarily concern the Kardashians. It did, however, provide ample material for debate in its discussion of the motivations of ‘Jihadi-brides’, with Mirza defending her creative choices on national television. We are no doubt all familiar with certain media outlets bemoaning how students are quivering snowflakes who react adversely to any hint of the polemic, so I’m interested in whether Mirza has noticed any significant changes in how audiences receive her comedy, even after the declaration that she does not consider her audience in the writing process. Has she become more censorious? Or has the supposedly more sensitive atmosphere become a tempting one, daring her to be more provocative for greater effect?

“I know it’s fashionable to be offended…some people on other people’s behalf, some people are offended because other people are not offended enough. I just think about what I want to say, what I think is funny, and I just go ahead and do it. If I thought too much about how people are going to react, and who’s going to be offended, I don’t think I could really do a true piece of work.”

Perhaps then we can take the comments concerning a ‘true piece of work’ as Mirza’s advice for aspiring student stand-ups, but Mirza did not begin her comedy career when she was at Manchester University. When I ask whether her degree has helped her with comedy, I get a flat ‘no’. In retrospect, I’m not really sure why I thought a degree in Biochemistry could have any relevance to stand-up. Yet it did lead to Mirza’s teaching career. Teaching was never an ambition; she entered the profession “not knowing what else to do.” It was in an inner city comprehensive that she realised “how hard it was.” Mirza is not the only comedian to have begun their professional career in the classroom; ‘The Inbetweeners’ and ‘Cuckoo’ star Greg Davies also left teaching for comedy. Why the trend in this particular career move? What is the logic behind such a drastic decision?

“It provided me with material,” she reflects. Teaching also gave her resilience. “There’s no difference, really, between being a stand-up comedian and a teacher. It’s the same thing. I used to teach sixteen-year-old boys. They’d stand at the front and say: “This is shit. When is it going to end?” I’ve never done a gig where people have stood up at the beginning and gone “God, this is shit, when is it going to end?”. So, I think I’ve had the best training. Nobody’s ever tried to throw a chair at me while I’m on stage. Or locked me in the broom cupboard. So, I think comedy is a lot easier.”

I conclude that Mirza wouldn’t recommend teaching as a career. “No, I would,” she answers surprisingly. “But…at 21, I had two degrees, I had all the knowledge, but I had no stories to tell these kids. I couldn’t relate to them.” I half-jokingly ask if she’d ever go back to teaching. “You know, I might go back… I do like to educate people. But I love travelling the world, I love being creative.” As she underlines, her current life is not that different. Her time as a teacher demanded her to be constantly onstage. “The lessons were one hour long! I mean, in comedy, it’s only twenty minutes!”

Classroom career aside, what influenced Mirza’s observational style? Her home city, Birmingham, offered something of an apprenticeship in her trademark observational style. Mirza remains attached to her home: “It’s where I was born, where I grew up. I go back, and I go down the road where I was brought up, and it seems like such a long way, from where I was then, to now.” Television was a source of inspiration, with comedians like Richard Pryor and Robin Williams lingering in Mirza’s memory. In 1975, Pryor entitled an album: ‘…Is it Something I Said?’, which is a phrase that you can easily imagine framing Mirza’s material. Closer to home, she cites Julie Walters and Victoria Wood as comedic reference points. ‘Acorn Antiques’, the brilliant soap opera parody set in the eponymous shop, was filmed in Birmingham. “My mother used to drive past that shop as she’d pick me up from school. They’d be filming outside of there. It just seemed like such a different world to how I was brought up.”

This is now a world that Mirza inhabits; the result of the utilisation of her life experience and watching the world around her. More than once in the interview, she reiterates the opportunities for travel brought by her career in comedy. “You meet lots of different people, you have lots of different audiences. It changes your mind on certain things.” The opinions Mirza forms forms along the way clearly enrich her comedy. One constant from university to the stage seems to be the Periodic Table, so maybe brush up on that before her latest show.

Shazia Mirza will be performing ‘With Love from St Tropez’ in Oxford at the Old Fire Station on Friday 6th April.

Twickenham extends Varsity agreement

0

A new four-year deal has been agreed between the Varsity Match and the Rugby Football Union, meaning that the women’s and men’s fixtures between Oxford and Cambridge Universities will continue to be played at Twickenham until at least 2021.

The new deal will run between 2018 and 2021 and so will oversee a series of key years for both clubs and the fixtures. The deal won’t just cover the anniversary match itself, but also the 30th anniversary of the Women’s Varsity Match, the 150th anniversary of Oxford University Rugby Football Club, the 150th anniversary of Cambridge University Rugby Union Football Club too.

The Men’s Varsity Match has been played there since 1921, with Cambridge currently leading Oxford 63-59 overall (with 14 games drawn). The women’s match has been played since 1988 and hosted at the national stadium since 2015, with Oxford currently leading 19-12. The game is one of the world’s longest running sports fixtures between the two universities, and has become one of the biggest domestic rugby matches in the UK.

Oxford Women’s Blues captain, Abby D’Cruz, said: “The Varsity Matches represents a great tradition in the historic rivalry between Oxford and Cambridge.

“The news that we have secured their place at the home of English Rugby for the significant years to come, including the 150th anniversary of OURFC in 2019 and the 30th anniversary of the Women’s Varsity match this year, is incredibly exciting for everyone at the club and a great motivator to represent Oxford on one of the most hallowed turfs in world rugby.”

Men’s captain, Dominic Waldouck, told Cherwell: “Some of my earliest rugby memories are watching The Varsity game. For me, Twickenham represents the home of Varsity, so it’s great to hear the contract has been extended.”

In 2017, Cambridge won both games, with scores of 24-0 and 20-10 in the women’s and men’s games respectively. The men’s result meant the Light Blues secured back-to-back Varsity victories for the first time in a decade.

Oxford student who stabbed boyfriend has appeal refused

0

An Oxford University student who stabbed her boyfriend has had an appeal against her sentence refused.

Lavinia Woodward, a Christ Church medical student, was convicted of the December 2016 attack in September last year, but has not served time in prison.

The 24-year old’s permission to appeal was denied by a judge at the Court of Appeal, following Woodward’s earlier trial at Oxford Crown Court.

Last year, Judge Ian Pringle QC gave Woodward a ten month sentence, suspended for 18 months, for unlawful wounding.

Woodward drunkenly stabbed her boyfriend of the time in the leg with a bread knife.

In the initial trial, Pringle stated: “It seems to me that if this was a one-off, a complete one-off, to prevent this extraordinarily young lady from not following her long held desire to enter the profession she wishes to would be a sentence which would be too severe.”

Such comments led to accusations of judicial leniency and inequality. Woodward was branded by some as “too clever” for prison.

The chief executive of the Kingston Race and Inequalities Council, John Azah, told The Daily Telegraph at the time: “If she wasn’t Oxford-educated, if she came from a deprived area, I don’t think she would have got the same sentence and been allowed to walk free.”

Woodward, an aspiring heart surgeon, has voluntarily suspended studies at Oxford, but could still return. She has also attended a drug and alcohol clinic.

Pringle also stated at Woodward’s trial: “You have demonstrated over the last nine months that you are determined to rid yourself of your alcohol and drug addiction and have undergone extensive treatment including counselling to address the many issues that you face.”

Complaints against Judge Ian Pringle were dismissed since they did not concern personal conduct.

OULC slam Labour’s ‘consistently inadequate’ responses to anti-semitism

0

The Oxford University Labour Club (OULC) have labelled Jeremy Corbyn’s apology regarding allegations of anti-semitism as insufficient, adding to the growing number of voices pushing for a stronger response from the Labour leader.

Corbyn’s statement, issued earlier this week, followed accusations made against both the Labour Party and Corbyn himself by the Jewish Leadership Council.

Corbyn claimed that he “will never be anything other than a militant opponent of anti-Semitism,” yet also criticised what he called “the continuing dispossession of the Palestinian people.”

While OULC “welcomed” Corbyn’s apology, they stressed that they did not view it to be “a sufficient response.”

The statement, written by the club co-chairs Ray Williams and Anisha Faruk, calls on him to “reflect thoroughly on his own actions as well as to apologise for the party’s consistently inadequate response to internal antisemitism.”

“We recognise that we all need to more to raise our awareness against antisemitism, malicious or subconscious, and press the Labour leadership to take stronger action to tackle it within the party.

“If we fail to respond robustly to hatred and bigotry we betray our fundamental Labour values of solidarity, tolerance and respect.

“It must never be forgotten that Jewish people are, and always have been, an integral part of the Labour movement”

The statement also made reference to OULC’s past issues with anti-semitism, stating that: “Our club has tried to learn from its mistakes and so must our party. We will continue to do all that we can to make sure that the Club remains a friendly and safe environment.”

Former OULC co-chair, Alex Chalmers, resigned in 2016 in response to a considerable number of members having what he described as “some sort of problem with Jews”.

He said that this was shown through their endorsement of Israeli Apartheid Week, use of anti-semitic language, and expressions of sympathy with Hamas and other anti-semitic terrorist groups.

This led to an investigation into alleged anti-Jewish sentiments in the club. The report concluded that while the club does not appear to be “institutionally anti-Semitic, behaviour and language that would once have been intolerable is now tolerated.”

In response to OULC’s statement, Oxford University Jewish Society (JSoc) president, Jacob Greenhouse, told Cherwell: “JSoc are very impressed with the OULC statement and are happy to see that OULC are committed to working with us and with the Labour movement to help confront antisemitism.”

University ‘confident’ exams will be unaffected as external examiner resignations mount

1

Oxford has said that it is confident examinations will go ahead as scheduled next term, despite the mounting resignations of almost 700 external examiners nationwide.

External examiners across the country have been encouraged by the University and College Union (UCU) to resign from their posts at the 65 universities hit by strike action, including Oxford.

The move is designed to cause maximum disruption to the upcoming summer examination period, which could lead to the postponement of exams and students being unable to graduate on time.

The University said in a statement that it “usually makes around 600 external examination appointments each year. We have a process for the replacement of examiners who are not taking up appointments, whether through ill health or resignation.”

“We are confident that all exams can go ahead as scheduled next term,” it said.

The UCU has encouraged external examiners who have resigned from their post to fill in an online spreadsheet, which details their employing institution and examining role.

According to the spreadsheet, 20 examiners have resigned from their duties with Oxford, with six of the 20 being linked to the Faculty of English Language and Literature.

Professor Ros Ballaster, Chair of the English Faculty Board, told Cherwell: “Typically we require eight external examiners each year to complete assessment of our undergraduate and postgraduate degrees in English language and literature.”

“Without the contribution of external examiners we cannot complete our examining process. The timetable for submission and internal assessment should be able to continue as planned.

“We sincerely hope that the dispute will be resolved satisfactorily and in a timely fashion.”

One external examiner, who recently resigned from their duties with the English Faculty, told Cherwell that external examining “is work that is not very well paid for the amount of time that it takes up. It is largely done for reasons of goodwill and collegiality – the kinds of things which Universities UK (UUK) and intransigent vice-chancellors are risking in this action.”

In their resignation letter, the examiner wrote: “I have been honoured to serve in this capacity, and to see the tremendous work undertaken by Oxford undergraduates, Faculty members and teachers.

“However, the currently proposed changes to the terms of our working conditions will do more damage to them than anything that I have witnessed in my twenty years working in HE,” they continued.

“It is clear to me, as it is to so many in our profession, that UUK are conspicuously failing in their duty to represent the best interests of vice-chancellors, of universities, and of the people who work in them.”

As is common practice, Oxford appoints examiners from other universities to their examination boards to standardise assessments across the country.

Through agreeing to set questions, moderating exam results, and ensuring that assessment procedures are rigorous, Oxford’s guidance documents explain that they ensure “the soundness of the procedures used to reach final agreed marks”.

UCU branch representatives are set to meet at 11am to discuss members’ feedback on the latest UUK proposal – put forward last Friday – aimed at resolving the dispute.

The proposed deal includes the formation of a “Joint Expert Panel, comprised of actuarial and academic experts nominated in equal numbers from both sides,” which will seek “to agree key principles to underpin the future joint approach of UUK and UCU to the valuation of the USS (Universities Superannuation Scheme) fund.”

Under the proposal, the current defined benefit scheme will remain in place until at least April 2019.

UCU general secretary, Sally Hunt, said in a letter to members: “We have worked hard to gain these concessions, but they were won on the back of the strike action that so many of you have taken.

“As always it will be for members to decide whether what has been achieved is sufficient to suspend our strike action.”

Oxford reveals gender pay gap

1

Oxford University has revealed it has a mean gender pay gap of 24.5%, which is higher than the national average.

The median pay gap shows a 13.7% disparity between pay for male and female staff members. The figures also show that 82% of staff earning over £100,000 are men.

It was further revealed that although more women than men are employed by the University, there is a mean bonus pay gap of 79%.

The University has blamed the gap on the lack of women in senior roles and has committed to increasing the representation of women across the institution.

Vice chancellor, Louise Richardson, said: “We are pleased to publish our data on gender equality. It is one important way of maintaining momentum and ensuring accountability.

“The lack of women occupying senior roles in universities remains a challenge to the Higher Education sector. Oxford, while an exceptional institution, is no exception when it comes to gender equality.

“We continue to work, however, with enthusiasm, energy and determination to address the considerable imbalance.”

The release follows a change in the law which now requires employers of more than 250 people to calculate and publish their annual gender pay gaps.

The largest imbalance was in the upper quartile of pay where men outnumbered women by 25.6%. The opposite was true of lower quartile of pay where women outnumbered men by 30.2%.

The median gap, which is viewed as a more reliable figure, fell below the national average.

The pro vice chancellor and University advocate for equality & diversity, Dr Rebecca Surender, said: “While it’s encouraging that our median gender pay gap is lower than the national average, we are not complacent and we recognise our need to continue to enable workplace gender equality across the University.

“We are committed to achieving one third representation of women across University leadership roles and on selection committees, and for women to comprise a minimum of 30% of Council and each of its main committees.

“Although there is a more work for us all to do, the University is clear that achieving gender equality is a key priority and we are committed to working to make this a reality.”

The data only covers University staff with Colleges expected to publish their own figures. Few colleges have released these statistics with Balliol College and Keble College showing the highest mean pay gaps with 16.2% and 18.5% respectively.

New College has also published its calculations showing a median gap of 24.3% and a mean of 12.6%.

Let’s Talk About: Drunk Texts

0

We’ve all been there: You wake up after a night out and something is missing. Could it be your keys? No, you needed them to get in. Could it be your ID? No, it’s on your bedside table. Could it be your phone? No. You’ve realised what it is. It’s your dignity.

It hits you slowly that, for the 10th night in a row, you’ve returned from some appropriately indie night at the Bully (or if we’re being truthful, Fever), with some appropriately worthy post night-out snack (or if we’re being truthful, Hassan’s) and instead of getting 8 hours of beauty sleep, ready to smash a day of productivity in the dreaming spires of the best university in the world, you have instead stayed up until 4am, texting a consort who probably studies philosophy (or if we’re being truthful, ex-consort) about how you can’t sleep and your feelings for hummus falafel wraps.

It hits you that, not only have you lost all your dignity in proclaiming that “ur gr9 c u in seminarrrr x”, but you’ve also become a fuck girl. This is the phenomenon I like to call ‘DTF’ – ‘drunk texting fiasco’.

The repercussions of a DTF can be hard to limit. Will your tute partner mind about the drunken Facebook message that says only ‘Hegel’ with 12 skiing emojis? Will your best friend’s boyfriend appreciate being told that “u shld get me a valentnes present to as I am half ur relationshi and draft most sexts u recive”? Will your tutor mind that you’ve drunkenly endorsed them for ‘banter’ on LinkedIn? Very probably.

You have several options in this situation. The first, and most obvious, is to blame it all on a malevolent twin. The second, and most 2012 of the options, is the classic “haha omg my friend sent that I’m so embarrassed ofc I’m not in love with you what omg”. The third, and least likely, is to try and accept what your subconscious is showing you, and confront the issues that your drunken frenzy has brought to a head.

There’s a maxim that ‘drunk words are sober thoughts’. But when your drunk words are ‘shout dijon site that tigre’, this becomes slightly harder to fully comprehend. So, should we be attempting to curb our drunken instincts? For the sake of dignity, the answer is obviously that alcohol and texting should be kept as far apart as Disco Stus and people with good taste. But in terms of what our drunk texting tells us about ourselves, I think we need to embrace these messy, paltry, and often overly emotional aspects of our inner selves.

If gin makes you cry about your ex, that isn’t entirely the fault of gin. If you tell everyone how worried you are about failing your degree after a Balliol Blue, that isn’t entirely the fault of the Balliol Blue. Perhaps it is the stress of being at Oxford. It is totally normal to supress an emotional response to something because you have a deadline, and you haven’t got time to keep on top of your work, train for a sport, and still get 8 hours every night.

We rarely give air time or precedence to our wellbeing. It is when drunk that these basic doubts materialise, and if your drunk self is telling you that you need to confront an issue, that’s rarely just Dutch courage talking.

Freud spoke of the id, the ego, and the superego. What I think would be more accurate would be the id, the ego, and the alterego you develop after tequila, who is an amplified version of your ego (more excited, more sociable) but motivated by the thoughts your id supresses.

This isn’t to say that you’re not being a total fuck girl when you text your hot neighbour with “u up?” at 3am, or that you shouldn’t panic if you wake up and see that you sent a snapchat you have literally no recollection of that has been opened and not responded to. But if your friend is crying about imposter syndrome after a night out, don’t accept their downplaying excuse of ‘drunken chat’. Our drunk selves may be more prone to vomiting and may be tasteless and debauched versions of our normal selves, but they are still worth listening to. That is unless your drunk self is telling you to go to Disco Stu’s. Then that really is just drunk chat.

Yo La Tengo Album Review: Convention and experiments

Surprisingly, quintessential critics’ band Yo La Tengo are more quietus than riotous on their latest album, There’s a Riot Going On. Compare it to songs like ‘White Riot’, ‘I Predict a Riot’, ‘Riot in Cell Block No. 9’. These songs are all rough and ready, evoking clashes with the police over protests, punch-ups, or prison. There’s a Riot Going On may not be as aggressive but that’s not to call it boring.

There’s a Riot Going On is the New Jersey group’s White Album – Just as The Beatles switched between concrete music and ‘Musique Concrete’ on their eponymous effort, Yo La Tengo show a similar conventional-unconventional counterbalance in album opener ‘You Are Here’. The name alludes to location, the pendulum bass to purpose, and the motorik drive to direction, but all this is offset by the static which starts the track and partial piano chords which meander below the mix.

This juxtaposition joins once more in the Grandaddy-styled of ‘Shades of Blue’. The off-beat tambourine and seventies soft-rock singing suggest a simplicity undercut by the sludgy strings and synths. But it is in the Gregorian-jazz of ‘Ashes’ where the band really come into their own, as the organ’s regular riff and walking bass build through swirling, symphonic textures and chanted vocals. It is St Germain meets St Peter’s Basilica.

Although they do dabble with the sixties on other tracks, perfectly pastiching Pet Sounds on ‘Let’s Do It Wrong’, YLT (who formed back in 1984) demonstrate the wisdom of their own generation, rather than a desire to be born in a different one. In the post-rock churn of ‘For You To’, electro-experimentation of ‘Out of the Pool’ and washed-out indie of ‘What Chance Have I Got’, the album is a showcase of what the band have done for music, rather than what music has done for the band.

However, at times the balance is off. In their attempt to create uncertainty, sometimes the band appear to be uncertain as to what they have created. ‘She May, She Might’ has the irritating falsetto vocals of much of YLT’s later discography and is only saved by the George Martin inspired tape effects. Likewise, the ambient soundscapes ‘Dream Dream Away’ and ‘Shortwave’ (which run into one another) are the longest 11 and a half minutes of my life.

Moreover, when they go short they often fall short. ‘Esportes Casual’ is one and a half minutes of bosa nova elevator music which makes you want to take the stairs. While ‘Polynesia #1’ burdens blissful Byrdsesque guitars with laboured lyrics; rhyming ‘Polynesia’ with ‘leisure’.

But the odd ‘off’ track is always found on a double album – what were the Beatles thinking with ‘Bungalow Bill’?! Moreover, these up and downs when taken in isolation, become ebbs and flows when the LP is played start to finish. There’s a Riot is certainly Yo La Tengo’s best effort since 2009’s Popular Songs and has a depth and detail which gets better with each listen. Everything has an air of CAN being played in a can and the echoey expanses created are there for you to explore.

Understandably, for a band with a foreign name, loved by critics and muso’s alike, Yo La Tengo sometimes seem self-indulgent and self-obsessed, a fact which they play up to with ‘You are Here’/‘Here You Are’ beginning/ending of this album. But at other times (as their name means in English) they ‘have it’; an indefinable ‘something’ which inhabits the expanse between earphones.

It is at these moments, that the call to arms of There’s a Riot rings true. The guitar effects affect us, the reverb resonates with us, and the echoing chamber rock which the band espouse makes us ‘riot’ against the echo-chamber of contemporary music. Rather than stand-up and fight, this album makes us sit-down and think, but in such a blind, busy and blundering world such a quiet riot is no bad thing.

Holidays lead us down the trail of discovery

0

Studying at Oxford can be brilliant, but the infamous bubble is often stifling and claustrophobic. Mistakes, problems, and difficult situations totally surround us and seem inescapable – that is, until term finishes and most of us migrate out of the city.

Taking a break from our whirlwind lives at Oxford can provide an outsider’s perspective which allows us to analyse them, be grateful for them, or change them. After a Hilary term filled with feelings of isolation and disorientation, the break is an invaluable time to rediscover our bearings.

But we as students are given these six week holidays, when for many this sort of break has to be self-imposed. This kind of self-imposed holiday, to recuperate and reflect, is presented with passion, humility and humour by Cheryl Strayed in Wild: A Journey from Lost to Found on the Pacific Crest Trail.

In the years leading up to 1995, Cheryl Stayed had gotten lost. After losing her mother to lung cancer at twenty-one years old, she took a series of wrong turns and found herself on a stained and bare mattress, next to a stranger, in an unknown city with a syringe full of heroine stuck in her ankle.

Cheryl decided to leave the whirlpool of disaster which her life had become and walk 1,100 miles up the West Coast of America, from the heat Mojave desert to the Bridge of God’s in North Oregon “to become the person my mother raised [me] to be”.

This could easily be seen as an indulgent holiday of alleged self-discovery, in a “gap-yah” fashion, but Strayed makes clear that the walk she takes is not a choice. It is an ardent, inconvenient necessity made in order to salvage her life and move on.

While most of her suffering was, in many respects, self-inflicted (her dropping out of college, her string of unfulfilling jobs, her compulsive promiscuity leading to divorce, and her eventual drug addiction) they nonetheless knocked her off her path in a shocking and brutal manner.

On her trip, she does not discover herself per se. In fact, the ending passage of the novel reflects on how neither she, nor anyone else, can ever fully know their “mysterious and irrevocable” self. Instead, it revels in the beauty of not needing to analyse and understand the meaning of every confusing element of ourselves.

The trip affirms for, not reveals to, Cheryl what she already knows of herself and the world, but has lost sight of. That she is a part of, not apart from, nature and the wilderness, as much as the mountains she climbs and the forest she treks through. And that she can bear more than she ever thought.

But most of all, the trek makes it undeniably clear to her that she is a writer. It shows her what she always suspected; that, through navigating in the wild, through her bizarre encounters, though each unique and life-affirming experience, she sees the world as a story to tell.

In the endless, lonely hours of her trek, once she has worked through the kinks of her past, she begins to recycle it into what would become her first novel. Thirteen years later she does this again, with the trek itself, for her second.

While the author’s experiences are certainly niche and call for somewhat drastic action, Strayed’s little unconventional holiday from her life is one of the better choices made in her twenties. Her holiday contains lessons which are of value to all of us. By cutting away all arbitrary goals, she is able to rid herself of her cluttered aspirations and illusionary needs, to find what kind of a path she wants to return to.

Any holiday – be it a few days at home, a lazy week on the beach, a lad’s trip to Magaluf or even the aforementioned “gap yah” –  detaches us and creates a little distance from our everyday lives. They allow us to assess them and maybe, as was the case for Cheryl, show us how we can abandon, express or change them.