Saturday 16th May 2026
Blog Page 911

US and Russian space agencies to work on new moon-orbiting space station

On September 27th, NASA officially announced that it will collaborate with the Russian space agency, Roscosmos, in the development of a moon-orbiting space station in the near future. Such a station will allow easy travel to further locations such as Mars, as well as facilitating research on the lunar surface. This agreement demonstrates NASA’s belief that the key to future space exploration is cooperation: firstly, this project is expected to combine the efforts of multiple space agencies and aerospace companies such as Boeing; and secondly, having a space station like this in place will make it much easier to build missions on the efforts of multiple different groups, since supplies and components for missions can be delivered to the station at different times from different suppliers.

The agreement follows a March press release in which NASA indicated that they were researching the possibility of a ‘deep space gateway’ – a station above the moon where they could pool their resources and send off missions to other locations around the Solar System – Mars, of course, springs to mind, but this could also include the asteroid belt and the moons of the gas giants, which represent a vast range of environments including liquid water.These missions would be performed by reusable spaceships, which may never have to visit the surface again once in operation, vastly reducing the quantity of fuel required.

Now, the space agency has officially agreed to work together with Roscosmos, as well as commercial aerospace companies, to make this goal a reality. NASA and Roscosmos together signed a statement at the 68th International Aeronautical Congress in Adelaide that “reflects the common vision for human exploration that NASA and Roscosmos share”, announcing Roscosmos’ intention to work with NASA on the deep space gateway concept and bring their Russian commercial partners onto the playing field as well. As well as this agreement, NASA has been awarding contracts to companies including Boeing and Lockheed Martin to develop and test possible habitation systems for their astronauts.

The American space agency’s parallel efforts to include both Roscosmos and engineering companies in this project demonstrates two factors in how they are approaching space exploration at present. Firstly, they are willing to invest resources now to facilitate frequent and efficient missions in the future. Secondly, they believe in setting up a platform for a genuine space industry, so that in future government-funded agencies won’t have to do all the heavy lifting.

The possible moon-orbiting space station is something that will take a lot of resources to build initially, but will vastly reduce budgets if NASA intends to send out repeated deep space missions in future. Since most of the fuel and much of the equipment for space travel is used just to get off the Earth’s surface, projects based in the deep space gateway using a reusable craft would be very cost-effective for NASA. Combining this with the futuristic Solar Electric Propulsion system, which uses solar energy instead of exploding fuel to accelerate its propellant and is already in use today, future research of the asteroid belt or Saturn’s rings could require almost no non-reusable resources at all.

As well as a commitment to efficiency and frequency in future projects, NASA has also now shown that they want the future of space travel to be in the hands of many small organisations rather than a few governments. The space station concept would create a rich environment for independent aerospace groups, with big one-off missions replaced by a constant flow of small cargo shipments and equipment upgrades that commercial partners could handle. This is something we’ve already seen happen with the International Space Station, with SpaceX’s Dragon rockets now regularly delivering supplies, including ice cream. As well as allowing commercial groups to help with deep space missions, the lunar station will itself be made with the direct assistance of NASA and Roscosmos’ friends in the aerospace industry.

The world may not have sent humans any further since 1969, but our attitudes about how to travel in space have come a long way, and the agreement made in Adelaide last month shows it. NASA wants to lay the foundations for a space industry in which everyone can contribute to the same goals, and replace expensive, infrequent launches with a constant stream of small, efficient trips. And once we can get the infrastructure in place – hey, maybe we’ll finally get someone on Mars.

Cuppers – the greatest show on earth?

With pre-season for Blues teams well underway even before freshers’ week, college footballers across Oxford will now be turning their attention to the upcoming Cuppers campaign.

For many, their stomachs will also be turning, as the start of a new season comes as a shock to the system after a summer of debauchery befitting the superstar status of each college’s finest players.

The first challenge facing every team captain is how to disseminate their own enthusiasm for a preseason training session throughout a dressing room packed with big names, and even bigger egos. You never lose that natural goalscoring instinct, insists last season’s top scorer, as he neglects to confirm his availability on the Doodle poll. Whether or not that is the case, you can certainly lose your fitness, as demonstrated when another striker suffers a hamstring injury putting out cones for a training exercise.

Something else you can lose, of course, is your best player. This is only natural, given the intense physical demands of both league and Cuppers, which take their toll on the body after three or four years. After this time, having given blood, sweat and tears for their college, players have little reason to remain in Oxford and so tend to move on to the next stage of their lives.

This presents a problem for teams, without the luxury of a transfer window afforded to lesser leagues around the globe, as they are forced to put their faith in the lottery that is the college application process.

A college’s golden generation may have just ‘graduated’ on a high, having achieved promotion by winning the league, but the team they leave behind face a harrowing season if the freshers who replace them are more Alan Hutton than Alan Shearer.

However, as Oscar Wilde said, having captained Magdalen seconds to Cuppers glory in 1876-77, ‘Football is about the team, not the individuals.’ Certainly, college football brings together a diverse group of individuals who would perhaps not otherwise rub shoulders, but once they pull on the college strip, crest above heart, they are united, by a love of the game and an even stronger love for their college.

One of the new lads will score with an overhead kick in the first few minutes of his debut, only to never score again, but that one moment of magic will cement his place in college legend. The key to making or breaking a team’s season could be how well the players channel their college pride, and how fast the new teammates buy into the collective mentality of the team and, of course, the college.

All this and more will be on the minds of Oxford’s college footballers as they eagerly anticipate the kick-off of the new season.

Blues finish third in Elite University Cup

0

The Blues men’s football team took part in the second annual self-styled ‘World Elite University Football Tournament’, this summer. Hosted by Tsinghua University, in China, the tournament lasted just under two weeks, and consisted of twelve teams from across the globe. In the first match, a strong Oxford team proved too much for Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, recording an 8-0 win.

In the next match against Tsinghua University, a high-quality, technical encounter ended with Oxford winning 2-0, finishing top of the group and setting up a quarter-final showdown against Hua Zhong University of Science and Technology.

The team took advantage of their rest day and travelled a little way out of Beijing to the Great Wall of China and the Summer Palace.

The focus then shifted back onto football, and the efforts of coach Juliun Liu and captain Laurence Wroe to keep everyone focused were rewarded with a comprehensive 3-0 win over Hua Zhong University.

This meant Oxford were in the semi-finals, having reached the same stage in the competition last year.

The rest day before the semi-final was used to experience more of Beijing, visiting Tiananmen Square and the Forbidden City.

The semi-final encounter was against the University of British Columbia. Although Oxford lost the game 2-0, it was a performance to be proud of from the Blues, and it is no exaggeration to say UBC would not have felt robbed had the result gone the other way.

What the loss did mean was a 3rd-4th place play-off against none other than the University of Cambridge, in an exact replica of the previous year’s competition.

With the game coming on the final day of the tournament, various commitments to internships and pre-booked flights home meant the Blues went into the game missing four key players and the coach Julian.

In what can only be described as a war of attrition, made so by the intense heat and sore legs after a long term and two long weeks of football, the 90 minutes ended with the score at 1-1.

Penalties followed, and nerves of steel by both sides meant all of the first 18 penalties were scored, leaving the score 9-9. Goalkeeper Sean Gleeson saved the next one, before going on to score the winning penalty.

Gleeson told Cherwell: “After 18 consecutive penalties scored, a call from the team on the halfway line meant I had to start thinking about actually taking one.

“I remember guessing the correct way and celebrating the penalty save before having to calm myself and show no emotion while I picked up the ball and placed it on the spot. I chose which way I wanted to go and next thing I know I’ve got the biggest smile on my face and the team running towards me, the most unbelievable feeling.”

The tournament itself was won by Tubingen University, who beat University of British Columbia in an end-to-end final.

Taking a knee is the best way to take a stand

0

The #TakeAKnee protest has reached new heights, covering front pages and headline news. What started as a one-man mission championed by Colin Kaepernick, then-quarterback of the San Francisco 49ers (now unemployed), has grown into a unifying movement amongst athletes in the US.

It has garnered support from the likes of Stevie Wonder and even Shad Khan, owner of the Jaguars and donor of $1 million to Trump’s presidential campaign.

Yet Kaepernick’s protest has coalesced into a vastly different debate concerning free speech and patriotism – bread and butter issues in the President’s eyes. Trump has done what he always does, and indeed what he does best.

The President took a widely held sentiment – in this case, American pride in national symbols, and racist/sexist/etc. undertones – to set progressives’ nerves on fire. Thus the stage is set, with Trump as defender of an almost commonsensical viewpoint: how dare these ungrateful millionaire sports stars disrespect the national anthem? How dare they use their stage as athletes to shove their message down the throats of the general public?

It is all too easy to understand the reluctance to mix politics and sports. After all, none of these football or basketball stars are qualified experts on civil rights or social justice. Neither, however, are they the first to take a political message to the sports arena.

One need only look to Muhammad Ali, Jackie Robinson, Tommie Smith and John Carlos to realise this is a continuing pattern. Perhaps we must look to the meaning of the protest itself to see why athletes throughout history have sought to use their platform as a stage for protest.

Colin Kaepernick, who first made the movement iconic, cited police brutality and racial inequality as the reason behind his protest. Like Smith and Carlos’ black power stance at the 1968 Olympics, Kaepernick wished to draw attention to the plight and disenfranchisement of African Americans, particularly from police brutality.

Those who defiantly point out the wealth of these sports stars imply that they should be ‘grateful’ for their jobs and instead throw their money towards good causes – never mind that Kaepernick donated $50,000 to Meals on Wheels in response to the Trump administration cutting funds for the programme.

But for the Black Lives Matter movement, attention and awareness is what they demand and what they need.

Through the #TakeAKnee protest, attention is what they have achieved – at least until the NFL decided to co-opt the movement for their own purposes. Controversy is what the Black Lives Matter movement seek in order to start an uncomfortable conversation in the US. So what is more effective than to put a spotlight on race for the millions of NFL fans around America?

Yet Trump has managed to handle the controversy with his typical smarts.

Kaepernick’s stand for racial injustice has been turned into a circus show with the issue of race ushered into the background. Even the recent Sports Illustrated ‘protest’ cover seems to erase Kaepernick’s presence and place the whole rationale of the protest under the guise of unity. Because who cares about Kaepernick when Tom Brady, a living legend and supporter of Trump, has spoken up against the President? Not on the subject of racial injustice, of course, but against Trump’s ‘divisive’ comments. It seems that the effectiveness of this protest has been happily diminished by the media.

One final concern must be addressed: do these players have to protest during the anthem? Surely there is a more appropriate time? But the American obsession with their anthem and flag is a strange, and often misconstrued cultural idiosyncrasy.

Because for all Trump and Fox News can parrot about respect for veterans, despite the former showing little respect for them previously, what else is more American than freedom itself? Indeed, many veterans including John McCain have taken to social media and news outlets in support of First Amendment rights; the athlete’s freedom to dissent is what veterans have fought for – a fundamental American principle which deserves protection.

But it appears that many are still convinced protesting during the national anthem and in their workplace is just too inappropriate for sports stars.

So perhaps the question is what is the right way for black Americans to protest? Peacefully? Privately?

Maybe a totally different question has to be asked: when will it be convenient for Americans to take notice of police brutality?

And, moreover, the even bigger question looming: can Americans do anything about it?

A fresh and quirky take on the brasserie

0

Long live the brasserie! Let us praise the purveyor of cut-price opulence, producer of delectable provision, conqueror of the vacant stomach. Branding itself as a “modern British brasserie,” newcomer No. 1 Ship Street no doubt hopes to blend French luxury with British staples, and bring some added finesse to Oxford.

From the exterior, No. 1 Ship Street has a quietly impressive feel. Partners Ross Drummond and Owen Little appear to have an eye for décor: the renovated ground floor is dark but classy – welcoming and warm, with an air of casual elegance.

Apparently, they also fancy themselves as innovators. Upstairs there’s a 28-cover seating area equipped with an oyster and champagne bar. Oh, and don’t forget the separate cocktail bar. Very fancy. Alexia, my guide for the evening, acquaints me with the downstairs, but insists on taking me upstairs anyway. I’m glad she did.

Two flights of stairs later, and I’m in a different world. Every detail, from the oysters exhibited on ice, to the trendy chic of the bar stools has an almost seductive je ne sais quoi. Full marks for the surroundings then. But what about the food itself?

The menu is intriguingly quirky. Unlike most self-described “British” brasseries, it offers de facto fusion – chutney and toast with terrine, as well as steak tartare with rarebit. The pickings are particularly paltry for anyone herbivorous, however: only one starter (I hope you like mushrooms) and a choice of three mains are available on the à la carte menu. Luckily, the wild mushrooms are divine, the sauce creamy yet flavourful and the yolk gooey enough to appease my fussy friend Zoe. My tartare is equally impressive, perfectly balanced between the rough meaty taste of sirloin and the piquant capers.

By this stage, we’re impressed. The starters are fantastic, the service efficient. The arrival of our mains only cheers us up further. Zoe is smitten with her harissa roast vegetables, whilst Rosie’s Torbay sole is also exquisite – the fish flavoursome and delicate, the caper butter sharp and delicious. My veal melts in the mouth. Dessert is similarly superb. Stomach stretched to capacity, I can only nibble on the cheese board but the others treat themselves to peanut butter parfait and cheesecake. I’m assured both were exemplary.

I can’t help but ponder the future of No. 1 Ship Street. It might not be a big brand, but its innovative dining experience makes it unique. Yes, the lack of vegetarian dishes is problematic (the restaurant says it has since altered its menu to better accommodate vegetarians and vegans), but No. 1 Ship Street is a great restaurant, and, having been open for around two months, it can only get better.

The Bill

Starters
House Terrine, £6
Sirloin Tartare, £12
Wild Mushrooms, £8

Mains
Torbay Sole, £17
Veal Shin, £16
Harissa Roast Vegetables, £6

Dessert
Baked Cheesecake, £6
Peanut Butter Parfait, £12
Artisan Cheese Board, £12

Drinks
Pornstar Martini, £8.50
Gin and Tonic x2, £8.50
Bottle of Etna Rosso, £37

Total – £157.50

Love Oxland: “I’d say her spirit animal is a lemon beer.”

0

James Coates
Third Year DPhil, Oncology
St Hugh’s

I had to push our date back by an hour because a mate ran his car into a tree (the tree was fine) – so much for first impressions. Thankfully, I explained that said mate is a Historian, and Becky was more than understanding. We easily spotted one another outside Kazbar and it wasn’t long before we found common ground, chatting about the perils of academia. We found ourselves sitting in a corner drinking and mocking rowers for most of the night. After the fourth drink, we decided to hit up Big Society, although I’m pretty sure the Merton crypts would’ve been more lively on a Monday night. I ended up with a bit of a headache and a lighter than expected wallet, but I’d probably do it again. Most importantly, I’d say her spirit animal is a lemon beer.

What was your first impression? 6/10
Chat? Said I’d get devoured in Plush
Personality? Jimmy Carr after three benzos

Becky Todd
Fourth Year, Classics
Somerville

I was kind of annoyed with James before I even met him, as he delayed our meeting by an hour. However, it turns out he had a valid reason and I think in the end it was worth the wait! Right from the start James was very friendly and I found him really easy to talk to – we had a 20 minute conversation about sport, and usually I don’t even like sport! However, he was definitely too good looking to be single, which makes me think there must be something wrong with him. (Joking, kind of…) At the end of the date he told me to add him on Facebook, but unfortunately I don’t know his surname, but I would certainly like to see James again. Eds: See above for James’ surname… we’re all about faciliating love.

What was your first impression? Well-dressed
Chat? Really funny
Any awkward moments? Easy to get along with

It’s not perfect, but the Union is worth the money

0

It’s not perfect, but what it provides is unparalleled. The Oxford Union is, with good reason, renowned the world over for the quality of people it both hosts and produces. Merely being able to join the Union is something of an honour.

The price, even with a freshers’ discount, can be hard to stomach. This can be so even with further reductions for students from low-income backgrounds. It really must, however, be thought of as an investment in your future.

You’re buying a ticket to world-class speakers and debates, cheaper-than-average balls, and the opportunity to, once a term, give your approval to the officer candidates whom many claim have already been pre-selected for you in a dark room somewhere.

And joking aside, there are few places where you could get this experience. So you stood outside in the rain to meet Bernie Sanders? You still got to hear Bernie Sanders. Of course, balloting may be better used for certain events, but the opportunity alone is to be relished.

When Oxford is looked upon the world over as a centre of academic excellence, it’s because of niche factors like the ability of its students to debate with and, if they wish to do so, interrogate, celebrities and world experts.

Arguments that the Union is unrepresentative are with foundation. More can be done across Oxford’s societies to increase diversity among those who hold high office. But if this argument is taken as read, if we are given to think that it is only possible to succeed at the Union as a posh white boy, then diversity will never increase. Fewer people will join, fewer people will run for office, fewer people will see the benefits.

Membership also sees you able to join the competitive debating squads, benefitting from training from some of the best debaters in the world. Add to this a library that is well-stocked and underused, and a reasonably-priced bar that has an air of exclusivity whilst being open to all members, and you have a winning combination.

Much fun is often made of the idea of life membership: who in their right mind would return to the Union years after leaving Oxford just to hear a speech or check out a book? But even for three years, you can make, to the truly historic Union, cloaked in its prestige, the focal point of your University experience.

Christian Union banned from Balliol freshers’ fair

Balliol JCR prevented Christian Union (CU) representatives from attending its college freshers’ fair, a leaked email chain seen by Cherwell reveals.

The JCR committee initially attempted to prevent any CU representation whatsoever, stating that it wanted the freshers’ fair to be a “secular space” as it “couldn’t guarantee every major belief system” would be represented, which risked “alienating” new students.

Following discussions between the CU and the JCR Vice President Freddy Potts, permission for a single multifaith stall was granted, but only on the condition that it had no representative of any society manning it. This meant that no member of any religious society was able to exhibit at the fair or speak to freshers.

While JCR President Hubert Au stated that this conclusion had been reached through discussions with the JCR Welfare subcommittee and the college CU, his comments were described as “misleading” by a CU representative.

The ban has led to a backlash within Balliol, with a JCR motion passed unanimously tonight accusing the JCR of “barring the participation of specific faith-based organizations” and describing the step as “a violation of free speech [and] a violation of religious freedom”.

It states: “the Balliol JCR should not make judgements regarding the legitimacy of faith groups or religious expression.”

The motion prohibits the JCR from barring any official religious societies from participation in the Balliol freshers’ fair in future.

During the initial email exchange, JCR Vice President Freddy Potts, on behalf of the JCR Welfare Subcommittee, justified the ban by telling a CU representative: “We recognise the wonderful advantages in having CU representatives at the Fresher’s Fair, but are concerned that there is potential for harm to freshers who are already struggling to feel welcome in Oxford.”

He added: “Our sole concern is that the presence of the CU alone may alienate incoming students. This sort of alienation or micro-aggression is regularly dismissed as not important enough to report, especially when there is little to no indication that other students or committee members may empathise, and inevitably leads to further harm of the already most vulnerable and marginalised groups.

“Historically, Christianity’s influence on many marginalised communities has been damaging in its methods of conversion and rules of practice, and is still used in many places as an excuse for homophobia and certain forms of neo-colonialism.”

The CU representative replied that they were “not sure that it was appropriate or relevant for the JCR Committee to point this out in a discussion about Balliol CU; in the same way this would be inappropriate in conversion with many other faith groups”.

According to a Facebook post by JCR President Hubert Au, a single multifaith stall did ultimately go ahead with “representation” from four separate Christian groups. It is understood that as a result of the ban the Balliol CU refused to attend the fair or license any material distributed on behalf of the CU.

Au said: “Ultimately, it was reached to have a multifaith stall rather than a CU stall specifically, in light of both concerns raised by members Welfare Sub and by an undergraduate survey conducted last term which indicated a lack of familiarity as to where non-Christian societies, events and services were located.”

He added: “We didn’t want to monopolise the presence of any individual faith/belief society at the Balliol freshers’ fair.” Neither Au nor Potts have responded to Cherwell‘s requests for comment.

The Balliol Christian Union is affiliated to the Oxford Inter-Collegiate Christian Union, a society which represents Christian undergraduate and postgraduate students from across the University. The Union states its main aim as “giving every student in Oxford University the chance to hear and respond to the Gospel of Jesus Christ.”

Correction: An earlier version of this article was amended to clarify that comments made by Balliol JCR Vice President Freddy Potts conveyed the collective view of the JCR Welfare Subcommittee.

Ben Stokes’ arrest has killed England’s Ashes chances

0

It is very difficult for any England supporter to be optimistic about the fast approaching Ashes series in Australia. The selection of an incredibly weak squad has only been made worse by the debacle of vice-captain Ben Stokes’ arrest.

Getting hammered at a student bar two days before an ODI is ridiculous – he’s England vice-captain, the world’s finest all-rounder and a household name with a lucrative IPL contract. He simply cannot be so irresponsible, and his stupidity has made England’s already slim chances even worse.

It is unclear how much of the series he will actually play, but without him at his best for all five Tests, England will lose 5-0. Stokes’ aggressive and increasingly consistent batting,
combined with his pacey bowling, are critical to England’s chances of success in Australian conditions. Without him, England’s squad is short of both quality batting and bowling. The rest of the squad is simply not good enough.

The inclusion of Mason Crane, with a bowling average of 42, is a bizarre choice over the prolific Jack Leach or Adil Rashid. There will be a lot of reliance on Broad and Anderson, who are world-class in English conditions, but both average over 30 in Australia. That might have been mitigated by the presence of sheer pace, but with doubts over Stokes and the inexplicable omission of Liam Plunkett, England lack an aggressive enforcer that can match the likes of Pat Cummins or Mitchell Starc.

Meanwhile, Cummins and Starc will be delighted at the prospect of bowling at the likes of Stoneman, Malan, Vince and Ballance. Without Stokes the batting line-up will struggle to recover from the inevitable collapses. If Root and Cook fail in any innings, England could easily be bowled out for less than 200. England fans should prepare for the worst – without Stokes to guide them, England will get slaughtered Down Under.

Cautionary tales of fresher fails

0

Arriving with a reputation

How could I forget my first night in Oxford? I’d basically spent the whole summer shitposting in the offer holders’ group, and had gained a rep of sorts. At subject drinks, a third-year historian told me that I shouldn’t want to be a ‘BNOC’ because “everyone knows of you, and no one knows you”. I was instantly reminded of Gilderoy Lockhart’s words of advice in Harry Potter and The Chamber of Secrets: “Fame is a fickle friend, Harry: celebrity is as celebrity does, remember that!” I never could quite live it down and spent the whole of freshers’ week thinking, “what have I done?”

I spent my first night out dodging awkward lean-ins

My freshers’ week was a hot mess of drinking, dancing and regrettable life choices that somehow managed to end up being very enjoyable. Naturally, I went out every night on principle, and each night contained a golden moment of embarrassment: peeing down an alley, stealing a bow tie, and even attempting to pole dance in Plush – but I’ll focus on the first. After numerous shots, I was delightfully binned in Emporium. On a break from my sixth form boyfriend, I’d spent the night dodging awkward lean-ins and dancing away from meaningful eye contact.

Finally, I was caught. A well-timed snog from the boy I’d been chatting to sent me running. I was in no mood to keep dancing, so it was a miracle when I bumped into another fresher from my college. We left the club for a drunken adventure round Oxford, during which my new friend attempted to teach me how to pick locks with 0% success (I now know he can’t pick locks for shit). We wound up back at our college, lying on the quad, laughing about the ridiculous fines we’d receive if caught, and having DMCs till it got too cold to stay out.

Going clubbing for the first time

Before you start reading this, it is important to know two things: I am not cool, and I hate clubbing. However, when coming to university, I decided I was going to make myself like clubbing, and thus become cool. This is the story of exactly how that went. Actually, there is no particular narrative to the first portion of Monday evening. Essentially, I just consumed alcohol in the desperate hope that it would make the rest of the night fun (spoiler: it didn’t). We set off to the club and I was in high spirits, laughing and trying to chat with everyone on the way to make some new friends before the week was out. The first hour was totally alright (I didn’t love it – why would I?) but, shock of shocks, I seemed to have made a club-friend. This was both a blessing and a curse because we kept buying rounds of Jägerbombs for each other. I wasn’t drunk, but the copious quantities of Red Bull and all the corresponding sugar did not serve me well. I had to lie down in the street to avoid throwing up until a FREP took me back to college. At 9am the next morning, I had to sit very, very still at University registration. I did not go out again.

The scouts found a condom in my room

My scout refused to clean my room for a week because I left a used condom in my bin on the first night of freshers – I had to buy them lots of chocolate to earn forgiveness.

I got with a total stranger

On the Wednesday of freshers’ week, I went to Emporium and within 20 minutes had lost my friends. I found myself in an inescapable crowd of total strangers, but got the impression they were second years. I saw a guy I thought I recognised and suddenly ‘realised’ he was my college dad. I introduced myself, referred to him as “daddy” and my memory is a little fuzzy from here on. Later, sober, I realised this was not in fact my college dad. Not at all. Total stranger.

A late night detour

It was a particularly intoxicated evening, post-Blinds, and I decided, upon seeing the queue for Bridge, that I simply couldn’t last 40 minutes of waiting, especially with a bladder full of wine. Of course, the logical thing to do was not to run into Spoons to find a loo, but to return back to college. The guy I’d been walking down to the club with agreed, and we headed back arm in arm. Upon arrival, I realised that I seriously needed to pee, and said I’d just run to the loos and meet him “by his room”. Unfortunately, it turned out I had no idea where his room was, and although he sent me very clear directions, my wine-sozzled brain interpreted these as cryptic clues leading me through corridors that had become a maze. After wandering through several quads, I met another person, and decided to explore the college with them, leaving the poor first guy to worry about/look for me. The next morning, I found the very clear messages and did my best to apologise for my behaviour, but sadly nothing came of this adventure.

Spotted in the nude

My room had a pleasingly big window, but not a great view. It overlooked a large building on the other side of the quad, which to my untrained eye appeared fairly empty. Over the course of freshers’ week, I did what any normal fresher would do: showered, dressed up for nights out, changed my clothes at various points. All very innocent, or so I thought. Fast forward a week, and I was sitting opposite a friendly second year boy on our college football crew date. We were having a chat about which buildings we lived in, and it soon transpired that – *oh God* – he lived in the building opposite me. Turns out, his kitchen was the floor below my room, and enjoyed a crystal clear view into my bedroom. “O-hh,” he exhaled, the light dawning in his troubled eyes, “You’re the naked chick!” I haven’t been out since.