Friday 17th April 2026
Blog Page 1115

Open Oxford goes into meltdown

0

Created as an online space for members of the University to discuss their views of sensitive or controversial issues, Open Oxford now faces difficulties as a series of bans have led to questions about the administrators’ rights to impose limits on the subjects evoked.

The group’s objective has been to “encourage vigorous but respectful discussion of any topic people are interested in.” Judging that a few of its members had strayed from this original line by posting what admins Jacob Williams, Alex McGann and Alex MQ called “in-jokes and frivolous humour” in their recent online explanation, several of its members were removed from the conversation.

This removal of members is not a one-off, with the admins making it clear that in the future they “reserve the right to remove posts and ban members for abusive and off-topic posts.

“Necessarily this will be somewhat arbitrary but so are all rules. We’ll try to warn people whenever possible before removing them, and we’re happy to readmit members who were removed if they agree to abide by these guidelines.”

Reactions to this have divided the active users of the group, some of which decided to create Open Rebellion in response to Open Oxford’s meltdown.

Sophia Nash explained this division, telling Cherwell, “The OOverlords have betrayed their loyal subjects. We have risen up in defiance of this dictatorship, to stand up for free speech in all its forms and because idk, we were bored.”

The word “purge” was rapidly adopted by members of the group to describe the series of bans. According to Eleanor Sharman, “The admins may yet see the error of their ways, but any revocations of their Purge will now be too little, too late. Original Open Oxford has fallen.”

Alex Doody, a third year German student currently on his year abroad also called for the admins of Open Oxford to resign. He told Cherwell, “Considering the entire raison d’être of Open Oxford as a group to facilitate Free speech, be that serious discussions, polls or even pure shitposting, an antidote to all these other proscriptive Facebook groups, I was initially shocked that a rogue admin would do this, and have become increasingly disgusted as it has become apparent that this may be a coordinated effort.

“I am angry at the way admins have handled this and acted in a way of which Stalin would be proud, and see this as an affront to the very Principles OO was founded to defend. The Admins should resign in shame,” he claimed.

Like the majority of members and former members of Open Oxford expressing their opinion on the meltdown of the group as a space for free discussion, Elrica Degirmen joined Doody in her statement to Cherwell. “This is an affront on the freedom of speech. Freedom of speech ensures that people are able to talk about topics that they want to discuss with others and there is no requirement to always debate “intellectual” subjects.

“Anyone could have banned individuals who make posts on things they do not want to be reading about and indeed no one is obliged to be in the group. It is a great shame that the administrators of Open Oxford thought they could just remove people for arbitrary reasons but it was pleasing to see other members taking a stand against them through continuing their discussions on other related groups.”

Some had a more positive attitude towards the removal of certain members, however, with Ed Mahoney telling Cherwell, “The removed people have a habit of ‘shitposting’ and spamming with unintellectual rubbish.” He added that they formed “a sort of clique which made it difficult for many to follow.”

More on this story: OO Admins apologise for “purge”.

Analysis: Politics and purges in cyberspace

University announces new college

0

Green Templeton College must be breathing a sigh of relief: no longer will it have the distinction of being Oxford’s newest college. Instead that honour will be held by a new college, the first since the merger of Green and Templeton Colleges in 2008, and the first built since Kellogg College was constructed in 1990.

The new college, to be named ‘Wartshog’ is projected to cost nearly £1b over the course of its construction. Though most of this, about £600m, will come from the coffers of the University and its constuent colleges, much of the rest will be donated by Joanne ‘Jo’ Rowling, perhaps better known by her penname ‘JK Rowling.’

Worcester Professor Josephine Quinn, a Buildings and Estates Subcommittee member, told Cherwell that Rowling was highly involved in the project’s conception and committed to building a college explicitly for the ‘gifted.’

“Her idea was fully fleshed out,” Quinn said. “And I must say it was brilliant – flew past the committee without a modification. Despite being new, the college will be built in the style of outdated architecture – Rowling showed us photos of an old Scottish castle – and open only to those who deserve to be there by dint of birth.”

Quinn explained that Wartshog College will take a revolutionary approach to determining admissions. Rather than requiring the ‘talented’ apply, it will send out postcards – to be returned by July 31 – to those whom the college deems to have just the right attributes for study at the University. Those students will be offered a one-of-a-kind education, all the while cloistered off away from the prying eyes of the masses.

The University said in a statement, “We view the creation of Wartshog as a way to truly begin moving forward into the 21st century. Oxford is continuously in the process of modernisation and advancement in order to stay truly competitive as the world continues to globalise. Accordingly, we are in full agreement with Ms Rowling’s plans to build a college where you will be able to graduate without having spent anytime interacting with anyone who is not in some way fundamentally similar to you.”

Students have lauded the University’s announcement. David Lawton, a second year at St Hilda’s told Cherwell, “I am shocked and impressed by the foresight of the University. In announcing that the new college would be built exactly in the model of pre-twentieth century architecture, they subvert our understanding of what modern truly is. And the decision to only accept those with certain ‘abilities’ means that Oxford will continue to maintain its firm hold at the top of whatever university rankings are next scheduled to come out.”

When asked whether he thought it was problematic that most of those who would attend Wartshog came from families that also attended Oxford, Lawton said, “Well, that’s only most, right? Every year I’m sure there will be at least a few who come from families in which neither parent attended a similarly presitigious institution.”

When contacted, Rowling told Cherwell, “I have always found Oxford a beautiful, magical place, perfect for nurturing ‘special skills.’ Not just that, but the University is the ideal mingling ground for bright young people and I’m sure that the relationships they form here will continue to shape their personal and professional lives for decades to come.”

In addressing the fears that students from atypical backgrounds could face discrimination and mudslinging, Rowling said, “It’s possible – but I think the education Wartshog will provide will be more than commensurate for any such problems. After all, they could always choose not to attend, couldn’t they?”

At press time, the University was announcing plans to identify potential applicants to Wartshog and other colleges as early as birth and make sure to accept them when they were old enough for admission.

Review: Zayn Malik – Mind of Mine

0

Mind of Mine is Zayn Malik’s first solo effort since his departure from One Direction early last year, so it is hardly surprising that the album makes explicit efforts to distance itself from that X-Factor brand of watered-down pop. The album approaches graphic sex, dark emotions, and the low points of nights out, which is a welcome change for Zayn; one of the greatest positives of this album is that it feels more sincere than One Direction ever did. But on MoM, Zayn still suffers from overproduction, which jars with what should be raw subject matter and lends an irritating self-consciousness to his supposed image shift.

Musically, the album has more interest than the two made-for-radio singles would suggest. The move from pop into R&B feels natural for Zayn’s vocal style, and while Zayn’s voice does little to distinguish him within the genre, it does work well within said genre’s limitations. The backing tracks draw from a wide range of influences, with unsurprising tinges of Frank Ocean and Robin Schulz, as well as synths that wouldn’t be out of place on a Passion Pit track, or in the softer sections of a XXYYXX album. This diverse musical source material comes together most successfully on ‘tRuTh’, which is also a rare lyrical high point. Its references to his past, trapped in a world that was “not [his] scene”, have the ring of honesty that makes good R&B, and the tinkling synth ornaments and relaxed bassline work well against the track’s softer vocals and chorus-soaked guitar.

Mind of Mine has moments of interest, and some genuinely enjoyable songs, but the extent of its weaknesses, and their prominence in the bulk of the album, only serves to overbear the stronger, more sincere tracks. It is, however, an album that could have been heavily trimmed, which might have made the issue of Zayn’s repetitive lyrical content less obvious, and helped the back end of this 59-minute album feel like less of a slog. Many of the tracks suffer from the common pop disease of having one or two clever lines padded out with rhyming clichés to make a song. ‘lUcOzAdE’, ‘TiO’, and ‘BRIGHT’ are queued one after the other, and ‘LIKE I WOULD’ comes shortly after, all of which are grounded in the stale, overdone, “let’s fuck” school of songwriting, making the second half of the album into an ad nauseam repetition of the self-evident theme that all-grown-up Zayn beats us over the head with in ‘dRuNK’ – “Right now I’m emotional.”

Delving into Dickens: A literary love affair

1

A few weeks ago, I made the mistake of telling my girlfriend that I’d never seen either of the Bridget Jones movies. She talked me into watching them despite the fact that I was happy curling up with my worn-out copy of Charles Dickens’ The Pickwick Papers. As I sat watching it, mentally ticking off the thinly veiled Pride and Prejudice references, it occurred to me that I recently lived through the plot of a romantic comedy myself. Not with my girlfriend, if that’s what you’re thinking, but with the author of the tattered paperback in my hands.

Much like the heroine of almost every ‘Rom-Com’ I’ve ever seen, I was introduced to the dashing stranger that is Charles Dickens. Except instead of being presented to my love interest by an overbearing mother or best friend at a cocktail party, it was in a classroom by an overbearing teacher who slammed a copy of Great Expectations on the desk in front of me and told me to “begin at chapter one”. It’s at this point in the movie that tall-dark-and-handsome usually makes an asinine comment that greatly offends and alienates the protagonist. This entire novel was that asinine comment; long, drawn-out, devoid of morals and with scarcely a likeable character, I simply couldn’t engage and vowed I would never being even an acquaintance with this man, let alone anything more serious.

It is generally established that the next few scenes involve the hero living their life, hanging out with friends and even a few dalliances with other minor love interests who usually turn out to be very, very bad for you. For me, living my life was my A-Levels. My friends were comfortable reads like Mark Haddon, Terry Pratchett and the sassy quips of Jane Austen, all of whom naturally offer the comic relief. My dalliance? An ill-fated affair with the roguish playboy that is Leo Tolstoy, which left me tired, exhausted and with a pounding headache. Dickens came up in conversations now and again, awkwardly brought up by friends in pubs and pushed by teachers and parents as the better match. It was relatively easy to turn my nose up and ignore his dark, shadowy presence at the back of my mind. Then came the literary equivalent of what I like to call ‘the unavoidable moment’. You know the one! Maybe it’s a party where the hero can’t avoid the love interest any longer, maybe his best friend’s starts dating the sister, maybe an office mishap means they have to work together. This is kind of what happened to me, except for me it came in the form of a university reading list. “You must have read at least three works by this author” it loudly boasted. As I looked at his smug expression, curly hair and row-upon-row of densely typed script, my heart sank a little and I tried to ignore the slight arousal of my interest.

During this stage, Bridget Jones starts to notice the more redeeming qualities of Mark Darcy instead of viewing him as a pompous arse. The same was happening for me and Charlie. Instead of the drab, dour and fundamentally elitist man who offered me Great Expectations, I met het intelligent, thoughtful author of A Tale of Two Cities, the cheeky, comedic journalist that penned Sketches by Boz and shrewd, perceptive and passionate social campaigner behind Bleak House. I was starting, it seemed, to see things from his point of view.

Every romantic comedy seems to end with a big reveal. When the past sins of tall-dark-and-handsome are explained away in a perfectly justified soliloquy. The protagonist curses themselves for being so judgemental. Finally, the two fall in love. I found my justification when reading a biography of Charles Dickens. It told me that when his stories were published in magazines, the guy was paid by the word. I’d objected to him on the grounds that he was long-winded, overly descriptive and a little boring, but I got it now! Of course he was going to ramble on for ages, it was earning him the money to buy his family food! It was admirable! Heck, if I was paid by the word, my novels would be twice the length even of Dombey and Sons! Suddenly, there was a brand new man stood before me! Suddenly, I understood him, respected him even. He was only trying to make a living. Finally, I could open up my heart to this intriguing author and let my love develop.

There’ll be a proposal of course, as long as it’s better than the dreadful, fumbling attempt of Mr Headstone in Our Mutual Friend. As for the sequel, well it’s obvious isn’t it? I’ll find out what he did to Nancy in Oliver Twist and angry and heartbroken I’ll end our relationship, subsequently struggling to forgive him before he wins me back with The Christmas Books. 

Oxford Muslim leaders condemn Lahore attacks

0

Muslim leaders in Oxford have condemned the suicide bombing that occurred in Pakistan on Sunday this week. 70 were killed and 300 injured at Lahore after a bomb was detonated at the city’s Gulshan-E-Iqbal park during Christian Easter celebrations.

It is thought that the majority of the victims of the attack were women and children, of which many were Muslims.

The founder of The Oxford Foundation Imam Monawar Hussain told Cherwell the attacks were “utterly senseless” and left him “deeply saddened.”

He added, “These were senseless and wicked attacks aimed at the Pakistani Christian community celebrating a significant religious holy day in the Christian calendar. My thoughts and prayers are with the victims, their families, friends and the people of Pakistan.

“As a father, it’s heart-breaking to witness the images of families and especially children playing, rejoicing and having fun, being cut down by such an horrific and callous act. As a Muslim, the Prophet’s words, ‘he who is not merciful to children is not one of us’ keep reverberating in my mind.”

A breakaway faction of the Taliban militant group, Jamaat-ul-Ahrar, which once declared allegiance to IS, claimed responsibility for Sunday’s attack.

Director of Cowley’s Oxford Islamic Centre Hojjat Ramzy said, “All Muslims condemn the killing of innocent people in Pakistan. We are praying for the families of the victims. Our heart goes to those who lost their loved ones.”

Since the attacks on Easter Sunday, Muslim communities worldwide have condemned the suicide bombing in Pakistan.

Oxford University Islamic Society told Cherwell, “The Oxford University Islamic Society would like to express its grief and shock at the heinous events of Lahore, and extend its heartfelt condolences and prayers to the people of Pakistan, and to all those around the world affected by terrorism. We note that the bombing, which targeted Christians and claimed predominantly Muslim lives, was an attack on Pakistani society, and we utterly reject this attempt to divide religious communities in Pakistan.

“We pray for unity on the values of peace, compassion and mercy, and demand for the venerable Christian community in Pakistan the unconditional tolerance, respect and protection that is specifically postulated by Islamic teachings. All peoples around the world are involved in a common struggle against violence, and we support wholeheartedly any group working for peace and an end to war.”

Fighting terror with perspective

0

In the last week, the so-called Islamic State has carried out two horrific attacks: one on a central shopping street in Istanbul, the other in the Brussels airport.

The former, which killed five people and wounded dozens more, took place just a few minutes from where I was staying at the time, and just a few meters from the church where I had been going to Mass. The whole area was immediately shaken, physically and metaphorically, and I felt fear all around – both in myself and in others. A café owner, Behzat, told me, “I’m very scared – Turkey used to be a safe place to live, but I don’t think that’s true anymore.” Terrorism also causes anger. A stall holder in the Grand Bazaar who asked not to be named told me, “[President] Erdogan has no idea, he doesn’t know where the bombs are – he says everything is safe and then the bombs go [off].”

Even worse than anger, this awful act has led to mistrust and division. An English teacher on the Asian side of Istanbul, who also asked not to be named, said he was thinking about moving home to South Carolina, but wasn’t sure he was safe there either. “I’m very worried,” he said, “especially because I take the metro a lot. You just can’t trust anyone anymore…anyone could be working with them.”

Fear, anger, and division are understandable reactions to terrorism. They’re natural. I feel them myself. But they’re also how the terrorists win. When Mehmet Ozturk walked down Istikal Avenue on March 19, mentally preparing to blow himself up, surely fear, anger, and most of all division were the reactions he was hoping for most. The best response to this type of terrorism is neither easy nor exciting: it is to simply ignore it.

This may sound absurd in the wake of ISIS’ repeated attacks across the globe, from Australia to California, Istanbul to Ottawa, and even more so in light of all the other terrorism that has claimed so many lives over the years. But when you look more closely at the figures, our collective fear of terrorism seems less reasonable. According to the New America Foundation, a think tank in Washington D.C., an average of three Americans have been killed by jihadist terrorism per year since 9/11.

Compare this to the fact that about thirty Americans die every day from regular gun violence, eighty-three from falls, and over a hundred from car accidents. An American is more than ten thousand times more likely to die from a fatal fall than from terrorism, and yet as Paul Waldman of the Washington Post points out, “we haven’t declared a ‘War on Falling’ and nobody tells pollsters their biggest fear is that they or someone in their family will suffer a fatal fall.” The figures are similar for the UK: according to a 2012 report compiled for Parliament by David Anderson, terrorism killed about the same number of people in the UK from 2000-2011 as bees. Over that same period, drowning in the bath was the cause of death for six times as many UK residents as terrorism, and cycling accidents were about twenty-four times more deadly than jihad. More troubling, when one considers the results of our dramatic emotional response to terrorism, about twenty times as many UK citizens were killed through combat in Afghanistan as died from terrorism against civilians.

When I left Istanbul for Riga, my family was understandably relieved. It is highly unlikely that there are any extremists plotting the overthrow of the evil Latvian empire. But in fact, being outside ISIS’ sphere of influence makes me hardly any safer at all. The real threats are in the five-way intersection down the street, the hamburger I had for lunch, and the bathtub waiting to welcome me with open, deadly arms when I finish writing this piece.

Terrorism is not an existential threat to our lives, culture, or civilization, unless we make it so. The real damage done by these attacks is not in the loss of life and limb, tragic as these deaths and injuries are, but in the reaction felt by hundreds of millions of people around the world; our collective intake of breath and double-locking of the door. In the face of terrorism we ought not declare war, restrict civil liberties, or cower in fear of the next attack – this is what the terrorists hope for, and the only way they can inflict true damage. Instead, we should treat terrorists like their equally deadly insect counterparts: a nuisance.

Of course, we should take commonsense precautions – if you have an allergy then beekeeping probably isn’t the career for you, and I’m not planning a summer holiday in Syria any time soon, but living in fear is not only unnecessary, but foolish. We will never defeat every last Islamic extremist who wishes to destroy the Western way of life; ideas are not killed with bullets. Instead, we should take away the only true power they have by refusing to overreact to terrorist violence.

Review: Grimsby – crude and vulgar

0

“I told you not to smoke.”

“I thought you just meant crack.”

These were some of the first lines in Sacha Baron Cohen’s recent movie, Grimsby. The comedy sees Nobby (Baron Cohen), an unemployed father of nine living in the northern English fishing town of Grimsby. From the outset we are told he is still searching for his long-lost brother after a 28 year separation. Queue, Sebastian (Strong). At a charity event, Nobby is reunited with his brother – who happens to be an MI6 agent with a surprisingly RP accent. After Nobby causes Sebastian to be blamed for a murder, forcing them on the run, a chain of ‘humorous’ events unfold which culminate in the two brothers making peace and saving the world. Rebel Wilson and Penelope Cruz both made the questionable decision to take minor roles in the movie, though the focus remains on the brothers’ relationship.

The description above makes it seem as though this film has a storyline, albeit a far-fetched one. It does not. The plot is a confused mix of a mocking take on working-class life in Grimsby, a conventional ‘spy-gone-rogue’ tale and an attempt at a heart-warming reunion with the message of family. All of this was paired with outrageous attempts at humour and crude sexual references. For me, it was so bad I had to cover my eyes. Perhaps I was being too harsh, but just one of the vulgar running jokes in this film was that numerous celebrities were diagnosed with AIDS from the blood of a young, wheelchair-bound Palestinian boy, said to be the ‘international symbol of peace.’ These celebrities included Daniel Radcliffe (though not the real one), and Donald Trump, whom, when infected actually roused applause from some members of the cinema audience. Perhaps that tells us more about opinions towards American politics than it does about the entertainment this film offered, but clearly such outrageous humour was, at times, enjoyed by other spectators. Or maybe they were just laughing because they didn’t know what else to do.

Sacha Baron Cohen has been in the press a lot recently after the controversial revival of ‘Ali G’ at the Oscars this year. He affronted the #OscarsSoWhite debate about lack of racial diversity in the nominees for this year’s Academy Awards by referring to himself “just another token black presenter.” He is renowned for his less-than politically correct attempts to use humour to bring attention to social issues, and the characters of Ali G and Borat were received well by critics. So, was that the case in Grimsby? I personally struggle to see how pointed generalisations about a working-class lifestyle will have a positive outcome. Any stereotypes which exist about the people of northern fishing towns are amplified; the opening sequence of the movie sees a queue of people outside the Job Centre, everyone walks around in England football shirts, and Nobby’s son Luke has a shaved head, a ploy for the family to claim benefits for his inexistent leukaemia.

The film does, however raise an interesting point on class inequality. Penelope Cruz’s character turns out to be the evil mastermind has a plan to “cure the world” by infecting all those present at the World Cup final, in her words, “the imbeciles”, with AIDS. In response, Cohen makes a rousing speech to his fellow Grimsby residents about their worth; they are the “scum” responsible for building the hospitals which are closed down by upper-class members of society. Can this be taken as a direct criticism of the current government cuts? He ends with the line, “scum cannot be washed away, ever”; if so, it’s one which still kicks the poor.

The film does reflect on positive aspects of working-class culture in other respects. The sense of community amongst the people of Grimsby means we always see them together, and the theme of family is prominent amongst the characters. We are obliged, in some ways to sympathise with the plight of those who are burdened with the stereotype of being worthless. But overall the film is counter-productive,  perpetuating negative assumptions of the ‘idle’ and ‘feckless’ poor who don’t know how to help themselves.

Whilst the film raises interesting arguments regarding social inequality, it failed to do so in a tasteful and productive way. Any attempt at progressive ideas amongst the crude humour were diminished by exaggerated stereotypes and a tiring plotline. If this were Sacha Baron Cohen’s first film, and he wasn’t propped up by past successes, I’m sure he would find himself as jobless as Nobby.

Words – Cherwell fiction

0

She doesn’t want to talk about it and I don’t want to hear her say it, so instead she asks me, “Clayton, how high are we?” I run my tongue across my lips and peer over the edge of the cliff. The tops of pine trees hover a few dozen feet below the soles of my shoes. I spit over the edge. It hits one of the lower rock formations, splatters. It is almost dark already. Off in the distance our town looks like a cluster of lightning bugs. Mom will be calling us home for dinner soon. My palms are sweating. I concentrate on the way the pebbles dig into my skin so I don’t have to look at her and ask about it.

“Pretty high,” I say.

“How high is ‘pretty’?”

“Really damn high.”

She sighs and leans her head back and reaches for her purse. She pulls out a pack of cigarettes, knocks it twice against her palm out of habit, and removes one. Next a lighter. Flick. The tip of the cigarette catches. Orange sparks glow at the end of her mouth. ‘“Really damn high’,” she repeats.

She offers me the pack. I decline with a scrunch of my lips and a jerky movement of my head. We’ve been here for nearly two hours and done nothing but smoke cigarettes and point vaguely to the distant shapes of buildings and try to assign the shapes to familiar places on the ground. We haven’t said anything important.

She blows a column of smoke out over the trees. We’ve always liked the smell of cigarette smoke—she and I—ever since we were kids—younger kids. Not sixteen and eighteen year old kids. Kids who didn’t smoke or drive shit cars or have sex or get pregnant. Little kids.

She’s smoking a cigarette now but I know she has joints tucked away in an old Altoids tin at the bottom of her purse. In another universe we’re up here smoking weed together and I’m a better brother. In this universe she smokes cigarettes with me and weed with her friends and drinks Fireball and coke at parties and probably blacks out and takes Polaroid pictures and doesn’t read books. She paints instead: India ink words surrounding acrylic girls with stick figure forms, letters curling around them like body fat and safety.

“So,” I say.

She says “so”, too. She takes another drag. I should tell her not to smoke, but I don’t. I think, maybe the smoke will kill it. I think, maybe the smoke will kill her, and regret it instantly.

“We should get home,” I say.

“Can you drop me off at Adam’s?” she says, not “What’s for dinner?” or “Yeah.”

“No,” I say. “Mom said she wants us to come home.”

She takes another drag. I don’t like Adam, even though I don’t know really him. I think about her carving apologies for breathing into her legs and asking guys she barely knows to drive her to abortion clinics and liquor stores and her sitting on the edges of parties drinking Fireball and coke and taking Polaroid pictures and guys talking about her ripped leggings and the things they’ll do to her when she’s drunk enough.

“Please?” she says, less like begging. More like she knows I’ll give in.

“I don’t think so,” I say.

She finishes her cigarette. She tosses the burning end over the edge of the cliff. We watch it fall, hit rocks softly, anti-climatic. Without meaning to, the image of her jumping plays in my head: Not thinking about what it would be like to hit the bottom. Just for the fun of it.

She says, “Can you drop me off at Molly’s then?”

“Mom wants us home.” It has worn thin, this threat of disappointment. I wonder what she’ll do when I’m gone. When she’s up here with her friends smoking weed and the trees are brown and I’m at school and I have forgotten to call.

“I’ll call Mom on the way there and ask,” she lies.

It’s dark now. Molly lives on the other side of the mountain. If we leave now, I’ll be home after the leftovers are put away. Dad will be in the living room, not speaking. Home but not home. Mom will be doing dishes. I bet she only set the table for three. I bet she knew I’d come home alone.

“Are you pregnant?” I ask.

She laughs. “What?”

I will not ask again, the advantage of answering a question with a question.

“Come on,” I say. “Let’s go.”

We stand and walk back to the car. Evenings are cold now. I left my sweatshirt on someone’s floor. It smells like other people’s sweat and spilled beer and accidents and mistakes. The things I tell her not to do but she does because she’s sixteen.

We get in the car. I start the engine. The headlights chase a deer into the safety of the trees. I say, “I’ll take you to Adam’s” because it’s closer to home.

“Cool. Thanks,” she says.

She turns on the radio and rolls the window down. I don’t object even though the wind is cold as we drive down the mountain. I picture her painting a girl in a brightly colored dress with words curled around her in a series of “yeses” that all read like “help”. Somewhere, in a book I haven’t read yet but probably said I have, are all the words I’m supposed to say. But I don’t want to talk about it and she doesn’t want to say it so we drive, slowly, and I wait for her to change her mind and she hums along to the music like an apology burning the insides of her lips.

Common People festival playlist

0

Rob Da Bank’s Common People Oxford will be ruling the May Bank Holiday in style on May 28 and 29. Here are some of the best tracks from the line-up’s offerings to get you in the festival mood.

1. Duran Duran – ‘Girls On Film’

You could go for the obscure, the underrated, but when a band have a banger like this one, there is no point trying to be clever about it. Everyone’s hoping the Birmingham group will bring out this groovy number as they headline Common People’s Saturday night.

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KCjMZMxNr-0]

2. Primal Scream – ‘Movin’ On Up’

Again, it is Primal Scream’s likeliest Common People crowd pleaser that we are all hoping for. The end notes of this orginal version sway into a motown-like feel, and waiting to see if and how the group put a current spin on this 1991 release is half the fun as they are set to headline the Sunday night.

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SnkjvECEQr4]

3. Katy B – ‘5AM’

Not as eponymous with the Peckham-raised singer as her hit single ‘Katy on a Mission,’ ‘5AM’ is set to get the party started in preparation for Duran Duran on Saturday night. With classic pop builds and an easy sing-along chorus, the beats in this song are unmissable.

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VDE2OMZtExY]

4. Craig David’s TS5

Craig David started his TS5 DJ sets as exclusive Miami pre-parties, and now plays to full clubs in Cannes, St Tropez and Dubai. There is not just one hit that we can count on to fill the ‘Fill Me In’ star’s set, but watching some footage of his previous nights is a good starting point for the Sunday night atmosphere we can expect come the May Bank Holiday weekend.

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MXgDsA_UTjY]

5. Public Enemy – ‘Don’t Believe the Hype’

Classic 80s hip-hop from the New York group will be infiltrating the Oxfordshire countryside in May, and what better song could prove their politicaly outspoken credentials than 1988’s ‘Don’t Believe the Hype’?

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9vQaVIoEjOM]

6. Jamie Lawson – ‘Wasn’t Expecting That’

Amongst a whole host of more raucous festival flavours, Jamie Lawson’s calmer acoustic guitar-driven pop will be a welcome addition to Saturday’s early evening programme, particularly if the sun comes out. ‘I Wasn’t Expecting That’ epitomises Lawson’s Ed Sheeran-like vibe.

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-lI_tgQMMk]

7. Cuban Brothers – ‘So Sweet’

It’s unlikely anyone will be complaining during the Cuban Brothers’ smooth, soulful set as ‘So Sweet’ is just one of a multitude of similarly lively summery tunes. This group are set to charm their way through Saturday afternoon with groovy dance moves and a truly eclectic performance onstage.

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ca9cxelkQbY]

8. Ghostpoet – ‘Sorry My Love, It’s You Not Me’

Whilst a lot of these acts will be a fantastic accompaniment to a cider and a dance in the May sun (we can only hope), Ghostpoet’s performance will require a little more concentration. Obaro Ejimiwe weaves spoken-word and raspy soul against tackling beats and riffs to give an honest soundtrack to urban life. This track particularly exposes Ejimiwe’s talent of poignancy and frankess in lyrics, alongside a soulful melody line.

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BIR_Qs3tbFU]

For more information and to buy tickets, check out the Common People Oxford website here.

Oxford least affordable city in the UK

0

Oxford has been declared the least affordable city in the United Kingdom in the midst of the affordable housing crisis affecting the South of England, according to Lloyd’s.

In Oxford, average prices are at 10.68 times local earnings, with Winchester coming a close second at 10.54 and London in third at 10.06.

The bank’s analysis revealed that there is no longer a city in the South of England where house prices are less than seven and a half times average local incomes.

Leader of Oxford city council, Bob Price, told Cherwell, “Oxford has held this unenviable position for the past seven years. The city area is highly developed with virtually no sizeable brownfield sites left, and the natural areas for housing growth to the north and south are designated Green Belt and in other District Council planning control.

“The Green Belt has become Green Noose condemning half of the city’s workers to live many miles from their employment and commute into Oxford on congested roads. The impact of ridiculously high house prices and the requirements of commuting are causing major recruitment and retention problems for the universities, schools, the health service and for many firms in the booming high tech sectors where there is major competition for labour.”

Oxford professor of human geography Danny Dorling, author of a book on housing affordability, told Cherwell, “The question people in the university should be asking is who will be able to afford to live in Oxford who will teach their children, empty their bins and staff the shops they use? And who owns so much of the land around the end of the city within cycling distance of Carfax, where people could live who work in the city? Only after asking these two questions should we worry about how unaffordable housing is for our own students and staff.”

In its analysis, Lloyd’s noted that the last time prices reached such a high was at the pinnacle of the real estate boom in 2008, just prior to the financial crisis.

The insurance market’s analysis is unique in that it compares local house prices with local earnings rather than national averages.

As a result, the most expensive house prices are not in London but in other parts of the southeast.

In Cambridge, Brighton and Bath, prices are all now nearly 10 times local earnings, while in Bristol and Southampton prices are closer to eight times earnings.

Lloyd’s attributes the increasing problem with affordability to the slow growth of wages, which has fallen far behind the rate that house prices are increasing.

Sixty years ago, buyers could usually find a home with a mortgage three to four times their income, but this is now only the case in Derry in Northern Ireland where house prices in the city are currently 3.81 times local incomes.

Although the majority of the cities branded “most affordable” by Lloyd’s are in the North, Scotland and Northern Ireland, buyers will still find it difficult to afford a home if local salaries are taken into consideration.

OUSU Rent and Accomodations and Oxford Homeless Pathways have been contacted for comment. The University declined to comment.