Monday 28th July 2025
Blog Page 271

“Now it’s just around the corner”: Impacts of the Russo-Ukrainian crisis in Romania

0

CW: war, displacement

The effect of the conflict in Ukraine on its surrounding countries has been unprecedented. A refugee crisis has unfolded on an enormous scale. In this article I will focus on Romania, a country with historic ties to Ukraine, and one whose response to the unfolding crisis has outdone expectations with an astonishing display of generosity. It has proven to be a lifeline in ensuring those on the frontline of the crisis have the funds to continue their work.

For this article, I interviewed Florin Misiuc, a Romanian engineer, who now lives and works in Hertfordshire. His hometown of Gura-Humorului is located in a northern Romanian county called Suceava, which borders Ukraine.  The neighbouring town, Siret, is a crossing point with Ukraine, and many stories have been shared with him of the events there.

I begin by asking him what the initial reactions were to the outbreak of the invasion and ensuing refugee crisis. He says that people were “surprised” but not shocked; that “none of us have been through this situation and we just don’t know how to behave. You’re trying to stay sane and rational, but you can’t stop asking yourself questions of where this is going to end or how it is going to unfold”. He adds that “I think people were expecting the refugees, but it was a surprise to see how sympathetic locals were there,” particularly given that “we don’t see many foreigners here. There might be some Ukrainian traders but not big waves of immigrants”.

Romanians came together to meet the crisis head-on. Florin has never seen such a massive mobilisation to a migrant cause in Romania, and indeed there has never been a comparable event. “It was just amazing to see people from all sorts of backgrounds and various trades come together,” he says. “Churches of all factions put differences aside to help organise the response and to buy and supply toiletries and nappies”. Since the Ukrainian government declared martial law, the refugees coming from Ukraine are now mainly women and children; men aged 18-60 have been prevented from leaving the country and instead conscripted to join the resistance movement.

Florin tells me that Romanians collected Ukrainians from the border and provided accommodation and food “no questions asked”. Even at the onset of the crisis, “they did not ask for money even though a lot of Ukrainians wanted to pay and had money”. Since limits on cash withdrawals have been imposed on Ukrainians, Romanian generosity has been vital in avoiding a humanitarian crisis. The daily withdrawal limit “is nearly nothing in Romanian currency” and so worth even less in Europe, meaning that “people are stuck there and can’t move on”.  

He tells me about a woman with five children, aged two months to 14 years old, who fled Ukraine to Romania. The rest of her family headed to Warsaw in Poland. The limit on cash withdrawals was not enough for her to pay for transport or food or communication. “It’s just heart-breaking thinking that they [her family] don’t know about each other”, Florin says; “all they know is that some of them took the path to Warsaw and some took the path south to Romania”. She is now trying to find other people wanting to go to Warsaw so that they can hire a coach or bus together. Without Romanian generosity, her situation would be substantially more desperate.

Local businesses have given their services and “helped however they could”. Many transport companies offered to take Ukrainians to airports. Florin has heard of people driving from Bucharest, 300 miles to the north, to collect Ukrainians and drop them off at airports in Bucharest. “These extraordinary levels of solidarity are not what you see day by day”, Florin comments.  So far, it is mainly people who are in a better financial position – “the ones with cars who could travel quickly” – who have made it to Romania. Most of this first wave are hoping to travel westwards and seek refuge in other countries where they have relatives or friends. There are likely to be further waves of refugees, depending on how the situation unfolds.

Romanian communities abroad have played a key role in funding the relief effort. I ask Florin to tell me a bit more about how he personally has been involved. He tells me about a friend whose extended family owns tourist chalets in their hometown, Gura-Humorului. Since the crisis began, they have swapped tourists for 60 Ukrainian refugees. The family’s resources are limited, and so they sought help from those abroad. Florin’s friend works in London and “explained the situation to his mainly British colleagues in the office, who all felt sympathetic and put in whatever they could”. Florin, too, provided money and asked his colleagues and friends for help. Florin’s generosity is humbling: “You might think it’s cheap to buy food, but it’s not, and it’s not only food; there are young children there, so you need nappies, toiletries and more.” He tells me that “we’ve managed to raise about a thousand pounds in 48 hours, which will feed those women and children for a few days”.

I ask if the power of social media has been important. “Absolutely” is his response. This is the first major European conflict which has been fought in the social media age. The management of the crisis has been made more effective as a result. Romanian communities across Europe can coordinate the donation and transport logistics of essential goods through online platforms like Facebook groups, where requests from those in need can also be made. Florin reports that after one request, “a lot of people brought water and sandwiches to help the refugees – at one point there was just too much food there.”.

Social media has also brought the conflict much closer to all Romanians – regardless of geographical location – and made it feel more real. “Individual stories aren’t that touching, but when you open social media, you are instantly flooded with countless stories – it hits different,” Florin says. Florin is also a part-time DJ, and is in contact with numerous Ukrainian musicians who are constantly giving updates on their situation: “They treat each message as if it’s their last one.” There is a lot of hate towards Putin. They just don’t understand why this is happening.

I ask Florin if he thinks the Romanian generosity being expressed stems from a sense of shared history, or mainly from pure sympathy. He agrees that there is an element of common culture; the southern side of Ukraine was part of Romania until it was lost during the Second World War to the Russians, and many ethnic Romanians still live on the Ukrainian side of the border. However, with the Ukrainians from Kyiv now reaching the border, the cultural tie is far weaker. Despite this, Florin thinks hard times generally bring people together, especially given geographical proximity: “The wars in the Middle East and elsewhere never felt that threatening, but now it’s just around the corner.”

The stoicism of the Ukrainian defence has been admirable and has drawn respect from Romanians. “I think no-one expected Ukraine to resist that much,” Florin admits. Ukrainians are conscious that on their own they don’t have the military capabilities to defeat an army like Russia’s, but morale is still high and is being boosted by crucial external support. A story spung to Florin’s mind about two of the first families that arrived at the chalets in the first days of conflict, when men were still allowed to leave Ukraine.  “The men said at some point that they will make sure their families get safely to Spain where they have some friends and then they will return back to fight. And I thought that is just absolutely brave”.

I ask Florin whether he thinks that the images that have been shared by the people he follows on social media present a different narrative to that of mainstream media. He replies, “Generally not, but of course it depends on what media you tend to follow. There is lots of misinformation. I have learnt to take everything with a pinch of salt. Both Russians and Ukrainians have war propaganda to motivate their troops and that isn’t informational.” Social media misinformation is present in Romania and has intensified since the invasion with “trolls commenting on nearly every post”. I ask if this has the capacity to stir unrest in Romania, but Florin is confident that few Romanians will fall into the trap of misinformation given the historic relations between the countries. Romanians harbour a general distrust and dislike of Russia because of their experiences during and after the Second World War.

Are people fearful for the future? Florin is upbeat, as, while opinions are split, the population is generally not frightened, and trusts the NATO alliance and the EU: “There is big support for the European community”. There has also been a collective realisation of the importance of joining NATO, “because otherwise we would have been in the situation of the Republic of Moldova, which does not belong to a military alliance; they are quite frightened at the moment because they don’t enjoy the protection we have”. Florin concedes that “of course, there are concerns economically,”, but affirms that “people are generally not afraid of hot war on Romanian territory”.

However, there was a lot of concern last Thursday (24th February) about increased jet activity in Romanian skies. This was in response to Article 4 of the North Atlantic Treaty being invoked by Romania together with Poland, the Baltics and Hungary, which convened NATO’s main decision-making body, the North Atlantic Council. The invocation of this collective defence article, which is triggered when one or more of NATO’s member states consider their “territorial integrity, political independence or security” to be threatened, reinforced the operations of the NATO airpolice. Despite this activity being intended to ensure the safety of NATO members, Florin says that for those on the ground “there is a lot of noise which is a bit frightening, and when you don’t know what’s happening and nothing is displayed on flight radar, it is really concerning.”.

Over the coming days, weeks, and months, Romania is expecting many more refugees, as indeed are many other Eastern European countries such as Poland, Hungary, and Slovakia. The European Commission’s aid packages will be important to ensure that these countries can cope with the pressures they will face; Florin notes that the Romanian capacity to help is limited due to its finite ability to accommodate the enormous number of refugees. From the accounts Florin has received, it seems that the Ukrainian refugees are conscious of their compatriots on the trail behind them and want to move on quickly. It is difficult to predict what will happen next and when this tragedy will end; we can only hope that peace and justice will come swiftly to Ukraine and that its people can safely return to their land.

Image Credit: Public Domain

Lentil and Carrot Stew Recipe

0

I know, I know, lentil and carrot stew doesn’t sound like the most exciting recipe in the world. But trust me, this is one of my favourites. Inspired by a Turkish recipe in an old book my mum used to have, I now use this pared down and sped up version as one of my go-to meals at university. It is simple, cheap, nutritious, and totally delicious.

Ingredients (makes about 4 portions which are good to freeze, but you can easily quarter the ingredients to serve 1)

·        Olive oil

·        3 carrots, chopped

·        1 onion, chopped

·        1 can of green lentils, drained

·        ½ tsp of stock powder/cube

·        A tomato (if you have one handy)

 ½ tsp of coriander seeds (or any spice you have really! Try fennel, cumin, pepper, smoked paprika etc.)

·        Salt and pepper

·        Yoghurt (to serve)

Method

1.     Heat some oil in the pan and add the onion, carrots and coriander seeds. Put a lid on it, and turn the heat down to soften it all off. This will be the longest bit of the cooking, so be patient if you can, but if not, a slightly crunchy carrot never killed anyone!

2.     Now add the lentils, stock powder, the tomato (if you want to) and about a quarter of a can of water. Turn the heat up a little bit and let this all cook for about 5-10 minutes so that the flavours all combine deliciously and the sauce becomes a little thicker and richer.

3.     When this is done, season well with salt and pepper to your taste.

4.     Voila! Easy as that. I like to serve mine with a big blob of yoghurt, and sometimes some kind of bread to mop it all up.

 This is a very flexible recipe and you can really add what you have or what you want to it. You can mix other vegetables in with the onion and carrot like pepper (pretty sure everyone has an old red pepper sitting in the bottom of the fridge which was on sale in Tesco), use any number of flavourings, serve it with some salad, or use a different pulse (like chickpeas, or haricot beans). Once you have made this you will see how versatile and useful a recipe it can be.

Oxford Foundry Launches partnership with FMDQ Private Markets Limited

Last year, the Oxford Foundry (OxFo) announced that they were partnering with FMDQ Private Markets Limited to accelerate Nigeria’s startup ecosystem. In December, they opened up applications for the OXFO-FMDQ Young Entrepreneurs Leadership Programme programme, which is set to begin in April this year. The programme aims to upskill young, Nigerian, aspiring entrepreneurs through various training courses, networks, and resources. Further, it will connect the participants with Oxford and Nigeria investment communities, including high net-worth investors, also known as angel investors. The Innovate Nigeria accelerator programme will leverage Oxford networks and partnerships for five high-potential start-ups. 

Nigeria is an explosive start-up environment. In 2011, it was identified by Citigroup as one of eleven countries who could grow global wealth through great growth potential and profitable investment opportunities. More recently, the World Bank gave it a “Starting a Business Score” of 86.2/100 – this is the highest in Sub-Saharan Africa, whose aggregate score was 80.1. Many successful start-ups have emerged recently from Nigeria, including Flutterwave, which is seeking to triple its valuation to $3 billion, and Paystack, which was acquired by Stripe for $200 million, the largest acquisition by the payments company globally. 

FMDQ Private Markets is a subsidiary of FMDQ Holdings PLC. The parent organisation, Nigeria’s first fully vertically integrated financial market infrastructure group, offers companies and investors support and access to capital markets. They also operate the largest Securities Exchange in Nigeria, with an average annual turnover of $564 billion over the last seven years. The Private Markets group offers these companies data and information services.

In the long-term, this partnership is expected to bolster the Nigerian start-up scene, thereby creating jobs and triggering further socio-economic growth as the country’s business culture continues to expand. FMDQ Group said that they expected the partnership to “develop market solutions in high-potential market solutions in high-potential sectors such as technology, agriculture, green industries, and healthcare”

The current culture for Nigeria’s start-ups is extremely promising. Recently, Nigeria’s cabinet approved the Nigeria Startup Bill. Currently, it is waiting to be passed into law by parliament. The proposals in the bill are to “ease regulatory hurdles, offer tax incentives and make it easier for startups to raise capital”. This is expected to stimulate both foreign and local investments in these start-ups. 
As the Nigerian start-up scene continues to expand, both due to the nature of the market and through the government’s investment, we should expect to see more and more exciting companies come out of the country. Through this partnership, OxFo and FMDQ are ready to help companies take advantage of the favourable business environment.

Oxford Union holds emergency panel on Ukraine Crisis

0

On February 24th, Russia invaded Ukraine. This is the latest in a series of aggressive actions taken by President Putin: having invaded Georgia in 2008 and illegally annexed Crimea in 2014, his aspirations for reviving the Soviet Union have been made painfully apparent. As Ukraine defies expectations by raising a fierce defence against the Russians and maintaining their hold of Kyiv and other major cities, many across the world are wondering what will happen next. To engage its members with the unfolding events, the Oxford Union held a Panel Discussion on Ukraine to discuss the crisis.

Guest speakers included Mr Robert Brinkley CMG, formerly HM Ambassador to Ukraine and Head of the Ukrainian Institute; Professor Neil MacFarlane, a world expert in the international relations of the Former Soviet Union and a professor at St. Anne’s College; and Sir David Manning, who was the UK Permanent Representative at NATO from 2000 to 2001 and served as the British Ambassador to the United States from 2003 to 2007.

A key theme of the panel was the unanimity of the speakers. All three were in agreement that Russia’s actions are both unexpected and condemnable, and that the West’s reaction has pleasantly surprised them in its strength and collaborative nature.

Molly Mantle, President of the Oxford Union, directed questions at the panellists throughout the event. She began by asking whether they were expecting Putin’s invasion.

All three admitted that they had not anticipated the crisis to escalate as it did. Robert Brinkley said of Putin: “He has been locked away for much of the last two years and I think that has not helped his frame of mind.”

Sir David acknowledged: “I didn’t expect this, but I didn’t expect Crimea in 2014. I thought that if he did [invade] he would stop in the Donbass region. I was wrong, and I now suspect he will go the whole way, but I hope there is still a chance for peace.”

However, Sir David suggested that Putin was also surprised by the response of the West. “Putin thought the EU would be divided in a repeat of Crimea… instead, half of Russia’s reserves are out of action and unavailable, with emergency interest rate hikes, a run on the banks, and the collapse of the Ruble.”

He pinpointed the reaction of Germany as greatly significant. Whereas the Germans had previously sought a commercial and cultural relationship with Russia, they have suddenly resolved to spend 2% of their GDP on their military. Sir David said, “this is going to change the balance of power inside Europe and inside NATO… suddenly the Germans are going to be much more powerful military players”.

Nonetheless, there is a very dark side to this military expenditure: Sir John predicted the spread of nuclear weapons becoming harder to control, with Japan requesting nuclear resources in the last 48 hours and others sure to follow.

Discussing the imposition of heavy sanctions on Russia, Professor Neil said: “the 2014 sanctions were pretty marginal in terms of actual effects on the Russian economy. The current sanctions will have a much more substantial impact”. He admitted that “the one apple that nobody wants to bite just yet is the prohibition of the import of Russian oil and gas”.

Professor Neil also noted that “Putin is having trouble at the moment militarily… the temptation must occur to him to do something about that by retaliating.” The possibility of a nuclear retaliation by Putin was held up as a terrifying but plausible consequence of Western sanctions.

However, Sir David emphasised the need for a strong response to Putin’s advances: “our values remain extraordinarily powerful … it’s terribly important that we take on our role of championing them and defending them, particularly at a time when our democracies are somewhat in disarray.”

Image Credit: Max Kukurudziak

Voices from Ukraine

0

CW: War, violence, death

Seeing everything going on in Ukraine at the moment, I was struck by the fact that one thing stayed constant, the suffering of normal people, both in Ukraine and people connected to them abroad.  So I wanted to speak to them, I wanted to hear their stories, and here they are…

Eleonora Suhoviy – Founder of the Oxford Ukrainian Society

Q:  How do you feel about the response from people in the West, this country, and Oxford in particular?

“The word that I hear a lot at the moment is surreal. Nobody seems to have expected this war to actually start. People were either in denial or they were deluding themselves, thinking that this is not what will occur… So even in Oxford, but also in Ukraine, I hear the word surreal and unbelievable a lot.”

Q:  And how about the response of governments?

“So the sanctions are happening after the fact, not before the fact. The individual sanctions, also the group sanctions, they are coming quite late… when Ukraine is already [on fire], when there are some buildings on fire, when there are civilian casualties… So really, I think their response is now more of a catching up with the events as opposed to preventing them or trying to do as much as possible to arm Ukraine to its teeth before the invasion had begun.”

Q:  Why do you think that is?

“I think partly it’s a desire not to believe that such a depth of wickedness and evil is coming out of a European country and from the Kremlin. So, Putin and his regime was seen as yes, quite ruthless, but it hasn’t been seen as irrational… So I don’t think the West expected him to inflict such phenomenal wounds on his own people because they said he is doing this to protect Russia. Well, now he’s not protecting Russia. He’s not only damaging Ukrainians, but he is going to have his own population impoverished and isolated on the world stage.”

Q:  How important are the shows of support and solidarity from people here?

“I talked to my childhood friends who are in Ukraine. They welcome every shred of news that shows support. They look at videos. They look at protests, they look at sentiments that say ‘we are with you’, they share videos of protesters condemning the Russian ambassador in Ireland, for instance, they are looking at protestors in London… They really do appreciate it. The news stations in Ukraine also pick up on these themes and they show them on news channels. [The protests] show Ukrainian people that they’re not alone and psychologically when you know you’re not alone… it is very, very important… And I think that does a lot for the morale, not just of the Ukrainian army, but also ordinary citizens who are staying, who are fighting and who are resisting… It just brings it home to them that whilst they’re sheltering in an underground station they can look at social media and say, look, the world is watching, these people are with us. And that’s what they do. They sit in those underground stations, they sit in those cellars and they look at their phones. The elderly are being shown these pictures by the teenagers.”

Q:  How are your friends and family in Ukraine?

“They are in Lviv, which is in western Ukraine. They are keeping calm.  So today my father was walking around the city, obviously inspecting it to see what is happening… So he was there and he chanced upon them, the local authorities giving out weapons to people, to civilians. So now you can pick up your weapon in order to defend yourself. So yes, they hand weapons to people who say that they will join the territorial defence force. … Also my school friends,  from early childhood, they’re armed as well and their teenage children have been attending shooting lessons. So they also know how to handle weapons, Ukrainians. You see, they are very patriotic, and they will see that it is a question of their honour, a question of their motherland, a question of their unity. … In eastern Ukraine, I have friends who have relatives there. [They have a Grandma who says] ‘Well, I’m not moving anyway. … Enemies come and enemies go, life goes on’.”

Q:  And what about Ukrainian people in general?

“One of the biggest tragedies of this war is that Russian and Ukrainian people are very close. They have relatives, they have friends between two countries. … People are close and that’s why this kind of division is horrific. It’s like brother against brother. It’s like mother against son.”

Q: What has the Ukrainian Society in Oxford been able to do?

“So what we’re doing is we’re putting together organisations and charities that accept funds… I’ve had many friends coming to me saying, ‘Please, where do we donate? Who do we donate to?’.  So we are going to share that list on our Facebook group.

“We’ve had the Oxford University societies come to us and say, ‘Look, we want to show solidarity’. … We are preparing a document to show them how they can show their support during the events.

“We have templates for MPs, how you can write to your MP, what you should ask for.

“Anybody who wants to support Ukraine, we are also organising protests on Sunday at one o’clock outside Radcliffe camera, everyone’s invited.”

Q:  If you could tell non-Ukrainians to do one thing they can do to help, what would it be?

“Make your voice heard in any way.  So either attend a demonstration with us or do a Facebook post or write to your MP – do something.  Don’t stay silent… Don’t do nothing, that’s the most important thing, do something.”

Roman Tokaryk – Ukrainian student in Oxford

Q:  How are you doing?

“I think I will share the feeling of many Ukrainians who are in Oxford and in the UK right now [in that] we feel quite helpless, useless. We just maintain contact with the families there, but we cannot provide any direct help.

“We’re just trying to get them money, raise awareness, do whatever we can just because we feel really helpless.”

Q:  How are your family?

“They are okay. They live in an incredibly western part of Ukraine, close to Romania, like a 20- minute drive, so they are safe for now.

“But my friends who are from Kyiv and other big cities, like more central or eastern, they hear bombings, sounds of guns, of military operations, of war, at every every hour.”

Q:  What have you been doing to try and help?

“It was a very impulsive and initial reaction to organise a rally. It was two days ago in Oxford and we just called around Ukrainians and asked, ‘“Do we have to?’”. Everyone’s like, ‘“Yes, we have to’”. And we organised and like a lot of people actually attended the rally.  There were people from Lithuania, Georgia, Poland, Denmark, and many other countries … we were lucky to get there a lot of people to show us such devotion but it was just a start and we want to push it further.”

Q:  How are you dealing with it, it must be so hard?

“Yeah, it’s incredibly hard… The only way we can deal with it is just to do something. And that’s how we express our solidarity with our relatives, our families who are not okay and not safe at the moment… Otherwise, we’ll be just sitting and crying in our homes.”

Q:  How hard has it been to contact people in Kyiv?

“As for now, it’s quite okay, it’s quite straightforward. Nothing has changed, but the worrying [thing] is that a lot of people are buying power banks and other battery stations.  If the situation goes bad, and it’s highly likely that it will become worse, there will be electricity cut-offs for some time and people will just have nothing to charge their phones with. So, now we are communicating regularly, but if the situation gets worse, we’ll just set up one two-minute call every six hours, just not to use up all [of the] batteries. That way people can communicate between themselves in Ukraine, which is much more important rather than just for getting information from abroad.”

Q:  Do people there see the showing of support from abroad?

“The first level is the support of ordinary people, ordinary citizens of the EU, UK, and other countries. And this is incredible, to be honest, it’s incredible.  I can’t tell you how many friends wrote to me, not just with words of solidarity or support, but with concrete, specific actions.  Like, “We have a house in Spain, we have a house in Switzerland, in Italy. If you know someone who needs that, let us know, we are able to put up one, two, three families, it doesn’t matter.”  I was really shocked that people do such stuff, they are ready to accept random Ukrainian people just because they understand how bad it is.

“On the level of politicians, Ukraine feels that it’s alone. I’ll be brave enough to speak on behalf of many Ukrainians if not all. I will say that there was no robust response to the war that [is happening] in 2022 in Europe. Some sanctions, but not all of them even targeted… The political response was quite weak. We still really need equipment, we still need military support. We still need financial support, more sanctions in every possible way … because right now we really feel we are alone.”

“There is such a great unity among the Ukrainian people, which I have never seen in 23 years of my life. Usually, people, you know, are just debating between themselves, they disagree on political topics or, I don’t know, everyday routine things, but at this point, nobody cares [about that]. 

“If people can hold a gun and help the Ukrainian army, they go and do that… I know a lot of IT guys who are providing IT support to the government to defend the servers… they [ordinary Ukrainians] can donate blood and they go to the local hospitals and I even heard of disabled people in wheelchairs who cannot even walk or help physically, but they sew military [uniforms]… The Ukrainian nation has never been more united.”

Q: What is one thing people can do to help?

“If you can donate any acceptable amount for you, even one pound, two pounds will make a difference because Ukraine compared with Russia is so under-resourced as a country… Even if you’re not happy to donate to military things, feel free to donate to hospitals… So it’s the one thing British people can do, they’ve already done a lot… Being here, I feel their support of my colleagues at work, as a student, a member of the community.  But if you want one thing to do, please maybe just refuse for one coffee in the morning and send [those] three pounds… and they will be so, so, so much, so much appreciated.”

Then came an extraordinary moment of kindness that summed up everything Roman had been talking to me about.  A man got up from the table next to us and as he left, he put £30 down on the table.  “People here don’t realise how much they have”, he said, and that was that.  It was a small but powerful act of kindness that will stay with me for a long time.

Julius Lajtha – President of the Young European Movement

Julius Lajtha is the leader of the Young European Movement, an organisation with groups across the continent that seek to foster European unity.  By the nature of his role, he has friends across Ukraine and Russia.

Q:  Given your role, are you pleased with the response, with the showing of solidarity across Europe?

“Yes and no. I’m pleased because I can see that civil society, especially because of the Internet, [has produced] a mobilisation of citizens that are very concerned, that are very much in solidarity with Ukraine… At the same time, I’m concerned.  I know that at our branch in Manchester… a large majority of the support comes from Eastern European expats that are active around civil rights… They are small manifestations at this stage and that is concerning, that civil society is maybe not very holistically represented.”

“At the same time, moving on to the more political stage, I am again in a twist.  I can see that there is an enormous amount of willingness to react to this. But at the same time, I can see that there are gaps.”

Q:  What is your organisation doing?

“So as an organisation we are committed to ensuring a very strong link between young people in the UK and young people across the continental part of Europe.  … We have a section in Russia, we also have a section in Belarus, we also have a section in Ukraine.  What this organisation tries to foster are European and global citizenship and identity. It’s about the promotion of peace, the values of human rights, the support and the creation of a political narrative.  But going forward, focusing on building a federal Europe that doesn’t allow, by the very nature of its construction, … for people to enter up conflict against each other.”

“We managed to publish a statement and do something that is very rare in the UK because it encompasses pro-European organisations, pro-democracy, pro-civil society organisations, as well as, critically, the youth party wings of the Liberals, the young Greens, in Wales and England, which is a huge step forward in the sense that we achieve unity on a topic.”

“Finally, we are calling on all people to remember one thing, and frankly for me, this is the most important.  This is a war between politicians, between states, between armies, and [led by] frankly a very narcissistic, barbaric, and authoritarian leader… I wish, and I insist on believing that the majority, the vast majority of people in Russia don’t actually care about this war… Ukraine is just something that Putin and his circles wish to gain back for their sphere of influence, scared of Ukraine choosing the European way.  In the end, I believe that Putin and his circles would simply love to re-establish the Soviet Union.”

“This is something that I’m really concerned about, that this is not where Putin will stop.  I think that what needs to be made very clear is that we need to remember that it is not the Russian people fighting us. This is the Russian President attacking us collectively as Europeans and Ukrainians.”

Anastassia Devos – in Kyiv

This was the interview that humbled me the most.  Julius put me in contact with one of his friends on the ground in Kyiv, Anastassia, and she rang me within a matter of minutes, desperate to talk, desperate to tell everyone possible about the tragedy in her city.  She is an ambassador for the Young European Movement and works for the Council of Europe.  Her defiance in the face of such danger was extraordinary, her stories powerful beyond belief.

Q:  What are things like there on the ground?

“In the beginning, no one could believe what had happened. … Of course, we [hear] about all this data from the Pentagon: ‘They will attack Kyiv, they have a huge amount of Russian militaries at the border’… But people in Kyiv, we couldn’t believe that it would really happen.”

Q:  When did you realise what was happening?

“Yesterday morning, I woke up from explosions… First it started at the military depot… But also they killed many civilians.  What they do, it’s inhuman.  They fire rockets into residential areas, there are houses destroyed [and there are] women and children who are victims of this cruelty.”

Q:  How are things now?

“At this moment in time things are calm, but yesterday there were massive attacks on the military airport close to Kyiv… I have a colleague who lives there and she saw fire from her windows and both those houses nearby were destroyed.”

Q:  What’s your plan now, are you staying put or thinking of leaving?

“I don’t think I will leave Kyiv for the moment because it is also quite dangerous.  Like this morning, they put a bomb under the bridge that connects Kyiv and other cities and there were five cars that were exploded and one child [left] dead by this cruelty… And also maybe for my personal and moral reasons. I don’t want to leave my parents and my grandma here.”

Q:  How easy is it for you to know what is going on around the city?

“So we are reading news all the time and then I have relatives, friends, colleagues in all different parts of the city and they share pictures with me.  So for example, my relatives who live in a different district, yesterday they sent me a picture of tanks and then pictures of people who attack our army.

“Russia, they don’t attack directly.  They have spies… they put on Ukrainian uniforms and they say they are Ukrainian.  So, this morning this situation happened at an entry point to Kyiv. They stole a police car and they approached the entry point which was guarded by our soldiers and immediately they killed them. And [from behind] they also approached with a lorry.  Our soldiers could fight them back, but we have very big problems.”

Q:  Do you feel safe to leave your house?

“A lot of Kyiv citizens slept in shelters tonight.  They say that three children were born last night in shelters.  So, for example, in my house, there is a basement we will use. We will be prepared and go there.  But on the other hand [we have] to take into account the COVID situation… it is not safe either because these shelters and basements are quite small.”

Q:  Are you seeing the response from people in the West?

“Yes, sure, I saw it and we really appreciated it, but we really need more [concrete sanctions].  Spirit is very important but a lot of people are dying here today.

“I’m very sorry for the Russian people, because I understand their president is insane… My mum has a friend who lives in Russia and this morning she said, ‘“Our military is trying to save you from neo-Nazis who captured power in Kyiv’.”

Q:  If you had one message for ordinary people here, what is it?

“So, yesterday we started the petition and we launched the social media campaign, which says ban Russia from SWIFT and help us to shelter our sky.  Because they attacked us from [the] air, we need support to shelter our sky.”

Anastasiia Mazurova – Kharkiv

I was put in contact with Anastasiia by Julius on the night of the day that photos emerged of tanks rolling through the streets of her city, Kharkiv.  She wasn’t able to speak to me but wrote back through WhatsApp.

Q:  Tell me about yourself:

“I live in Kharkiv, in the south of the city, near the airport. I am a lecturer at Kharkiv National Aerospace University.  Kharkiv borders Russia, so we were the first who heard the bombing on 24th February at 5am.”

Q:  What was it like when the violence started?

“These days were the most terrifying in my life. Every day it was bombing around the city. The worst thing was the rockets…  Russia says that they didn’t touch civilians. But it’s not true, they bombed our buildings, buses, cars as well.”

Q:  What about after the battle today, how are things now?

“Today [27th February] in my city, in the afternoon Ukrainian soldiers managed to fight back Russian occupants. Nevertheless, we are afraid that Russian soldiers will reach the airport near my district.  Also today Russia blackmailed about nuclear weapons, Putin mentioned that it’s his answer to sanctions from NATO.

“We still can buy food and medicine. Fortunately, in my city, we have electricity, heating, and water.  Shelters were organised for us, the biggest is in the metro, people spent nights there… Our volunteers are working very hard and actively. They help the Ukrainian army, forces of territorial defence, hospitals, orphans’ houses, old people.

“We all care, we send money to support our army, we speak on social media so that people abroad know what is happening.  One outrageous fact is that some Russian people say that here there is no real fighting. Many Russians believe that Putin has sent forces to save us. I have a friend from there who wrote such awful words to us.”

Q:  What are your plans going forward?

“My plans for the near future are to support the Ukrainian army, pray for peace in Ukraine and the health of my relatives, and to return to my beloved students at university to give them knowledge.

“Some people are asking whether we want to go to Poland or Austria or Germany as refugees. For people in my city, it’s almost impossible.  Roads, railways are blocked. But I do hope so much that the war stops and I don’t have to go anywhere.”

Q:  What would you say to the people showing support in England?

“I am very thankful to people who support us in England, in Europe, in the whole world. It’s so valuable, it makes us stronger. We feel that we are not alone. We are people of this planet, we mustn’t destroy it. We should support each other!”

Q:  If you could say one thing to Vladimir Putin, what would it be?

“Stop the war and go away so that people of this world never see you again.”

It’s hard to know what to think after hearing so many different people talk about their experiences. The crisis seems so close and yet, like Roman, I can’t help but feel pretty helpless.  More than anything I’ve come away with a renewed belief in the good of ordinary people, and a new understanding of the importance of showing solidarity in any way possible.

Note: the text of the interviewees’ responses has been lightly edited for clarity.

Artwork by Ben Beechener.

Socratic Society in free speech spat after debate cancellation

0

The Oxford Socratic Society, a forum for discussing philosophical questions, has been embroiled in a free speech row after cancelling a debate on the ethics of abortion. The motion, “Is abortion before 24 weeks unethical?” was set to be debated last Friday.

In a Facebook post, Socratic Society announced that they would not be able to facilitate a “valid and safe environment” in which to host the discussion. The decision came after a number of people contacted the Society to object to the motion.

The President of the Society, Tom Martland, advised that the Welfare officer should chair the debate; she is the only woman on committee. He told Cherwell: “as someone with a uterus, it seemed much more appropriate that she should shape the discussion.”

However, following the concerns raised, the Welfare officer and reps became unhappy with the debate going ahead. When asked why the committee agreed to change the proposed motion, Martland told Cherwell: “The Treasurer, Secretary, and I all agreed that, without a suitable chair, and with no welfare support in place, things should not go ahead.” According to Martland, the main concern with hosting the debate was that it would “ignor[e] the voices of those who had been elected to represent silenced individuals.

Based on the very specific circumstances before us, I felt (and still feel) that it was the right decision to change the motion.”

The vote to change the motion was not unanimous, however; committee member Sebastian Pearson told Cherwell: “While I understand the committee’s concerns, I don’t think that closing down dialogue is the best solution, especially on an issue that directly affects 1/3 of UK women and indirectly impacts almost everyone.

Even the former CEO of BPAS, a leading UK abortion provider, tweeted to condemn our announcement and emphasized the importance of open discussion.”

In the above-mentioned tweet, Ann Furedi, the former CEO of BPAS, said: “Conversations with those who think differently to ourselves are challenging in the best of ways. I know I learn with every debate I have.”

Furedi, who has spoken on this issue before, claims that “we need to challenge, debate and convince – not ignore those against us.”

Although Martland stressed that the cancellation did not mean that the society endorsed censorship or avoidance of difficult questions, the Facebook announcement attracted significant criticism of these exact issues.  Many Society members addressed the troubling implications and raised questions about the importance of debating controversial topics.

One commenter questioned what would be required for a “valid and safe” discussion to take place. “If Socratic Society, a society designed for debating, doesn’t feel it can facilitate a valid environment for this debate, it begs the question who can?”

Another commenter argued that the decision went against the “spirit of the society.

Socrates pursued the truth to the very end. For its namesake, SocSoc should do so likewise – no question should be off limits.”

Martland, commenting on the Facebook post, described this idea of the “spirit” of the society as “mythic.” Alex O’Connor, an ex-president, and co-founder of Socratic Society, who is also known as the YouTuber “CosmicSkeptic”, said that Martland’s comment was somewhat upsetting: “The reason I was involved in founding the society is because I felt like it did owe something to its members – a place to discuss ethical issues with a focus on the ones which are most important.”

When asked about the precedent that the cancellation of the motion sets, O’Connor told Cherwell: “Without an explicit explanation of what conditions would be better, it leaves a lot of room for future committees to look back at the incident and interpret it as a red line around the subject.”

The cancellation of the official Socratic Society event did not prevent members meeting from discussing the motion. The event took place at the same time as the official Socratic Society debate. Organised by O’Connor, the debate was popular, with around 20 participants. Of the group who met, 50% of attendees were women, with 50% of attendees identifying as ‘pro-life’ and 50% identifying as ‘pro-choice’. O’Connor stresses that this outcome of an equal split was not created by design.  

Martland, while commenting on the competing event told Cherwell: “I’m just somewhat frustrated that the people involved saw things so one-sidedly.

“Holding it simultaneously seems to me to tell the women involved in SocSoc as organisers that they are fighting a losing battle.”

The controversy raises questions about the future of the society. According to O’Connor, Socratic Society should commit to reconsidering the motion, and state the specific conditions under which a safe environment can be facilitated. That way, the society can make clear that cancellation was no infringement on freedom of speech. Refusing to indicate the conditions under which such a debate could be held indicate an implicit unwillingness to discuss controversial subjects, which would ultimately “go against the ethos of what the society was founded on.”

When asked under what circumstances a debate like this should take place under, Martland told Cherwell: “I cannot pretend to know exactly the thresholds and dynamics required to hold the discussion in the right way, but I am fairly certain that this situation didn’t meet them.

“After all, the point is to listen, and to understand, where our own understanding is limited: all of the women ever involved in organising SocSoc were telling us that this shouldn’t go ahead.

I hope that, in future, we will be more able to consider and make suitable the exact circumstances under which we hold a discussion like this.”

Regardless of what happened, O’Connor, co-founder and ex-President made clear the society must clarify, in a transparent way, how they will create this “valid and safe environment”. A failure to do so could undermine the fundamental justification of Socratic society; a place to hold challenging, ethical debates.

Oli Hall’s Oxford United Updates – W7

0

Oxford United’s return to form continued in earnest this week.  Wins across the board for the men’s and the women’s sides saw the club pay tribute to Joey Beauchamp in stunning style.

Tuesday night saw the men travel to bottom of the table Crewe Alexandra in a game that had been seen by some as an easy three points.  Those people couldn’t have been more wrong and Crewe put up a great fight.  The side in relegation trouble even managed to dominate possession but the Us did more with it, created more chances, and finished one on 64 minutes.  Ciaron Brown capitalised on the home side’s failure to clear and condemned them to a seventh consecutive defeat.

And so to Saturday and another performance to remember at the Kassam.  United played up to the crowd again in a crazy game against a visiting Cambridge side that looked better than their midtable form suggests. Oxford had to equalise twice in a feisty affair through Taylor and Brannagan as Sam Smith scored a brace for the visitors.  The Yellows were the dominant side though and a goal from Sam Baldock with 18 minutes to play set them on course for all three points before Brannagan made sure with his second in injury time.  The win sees them secure their spot in fourth for now at least with a three-point buffer over Sunderland in fifth.

The women weren’t to be left out this week.  After what has seemed like a torturous run of postponements, they hosted the Crawley Wasps and wrapped up a remarkable eighth consecutive league win.  Carly Johns opened the scoring inside 25 minutes before Beth Lumsden doubled the advantage.  The Wasps made it interesting by getting a goal before half-time but Daisy MacLachlan made sure that Oxford’s title charge would go on with the third on 73 minutes.  Next up is hosting QPR under the lights on Tuesday night.

The men travel to Portsmouth on Tuesday night and welcome Burton Albion to the Kassam on Saturday in a week that could see them up into second in the table if results go their way.

Match Report:  Oxford United 4-2 Cambridge United

There were a series of truly spectacular tributes to the Oxford legend Joey Beauchamp before kick-off and the players on the pitch followed up with a spectacular 4-2 win at the Kassam.

Players, staff, and the entire youth set-up took to the pitch to pay tribute before kick-off and the stadium was in fine voice as everyone showed their appreciation for the legendary player.

That spectacular atmosphere was punctured though when former Oxford striker Sam Smith continued his ridiculous scoring run, poking home after a defensive mix-up to give Cambridge the lead.

The Us had dominated up to that point and didn’t panic after going behind.  A fine team move on the counter saw the familiar ending of Ryan Williams sweeping a ball into the box for captain Matty Taylor to sweep home.

So, 1-1 at half-time and coming out of the break the Yellows continued to dominate.  Cambridge hit them on the counter again though and Sam Smith finished calmly again for his seventeenth league goal of the season.

United refused to sit down though.  Cheered on by another home crowd that numbered more than ten thousand this time it was Sam Baldock who found Cameron Brannagan in the box.  His finish was emphatic and gave Oxford the all-important equaliser with 25 minutes still to play.

From then it seemed like a matter of when not if Oxford would find a winner.  The breakthrough would come on the 72-minute mark.  Matty Taylor turned provider this time, playing a low cross into the box for Sam Baldock to slam home brilliantly.

From then on Cambridge tried to come forward more but failed to create any real chances.  Cameron Brannagan made sure of the three points in injury time after a beautifully timed run and a finish into the corner to match.  

So, Oxford United are secure in fourth before two big games next week.  If results go their way, they could even move ahead of MK Dons and Wigan above them into the automatic promotion places.

It all begins with breakfast

0

It has long been said that breakfast constitutes one of the most important meals of the day. Really, there is nothing more refreshing than a hearty breakfast after a good night’s rest. Delicious food is one of life’s greatest pleasures, and especially during the pandemic, it became one of the few things left to enjoy. Still, many people often lack imagination for this early morning meal and end up making the same things over and over again; the average working person is looking for something quick and easy like cereal and milk, whilst others may skip breakfast entirely. Trying to get ready for work on time in such a hectic world can prevent us from having an adequate moment to pause, and to eat. However, no matter the hurry we were in, my family and I would always make sure to have some kind of breakfast before starting our day.

Even though we would eat breakfast every day, what stands out as a tradition in my family is Christmas Day breakfast. Breakfast on Christmas Day signifies the beginning of the festive season, the time when my mum gets off work, and my sister gets back from college. It is the season when everyone feels more relaxed as, instead of rushing and racing off, we get to spend the morning together as a family. It is the time when we become reminiscent of what the previous year has brought, both on a personal and family level. This special breakfast is a must; it has never let me down.

Christmas breakfast is something that all look forward to and always enjoy. My mum cooks lavish treats, loving to take care of everyone. Mum’s breakfast consists of sunny-side-up eggs, some kind of meat (usually crispy bacon and turkey sausage), golden home fries, moist chocolate cake with vanilla icing, homemade biscuits with strawberry and fig marmalade that my grandma has made, pancakes which are eaten with maple syrup, and mimosas (mum’s favourite holiday drink). At the table we all usually start by grabbing a pancake. My sister always sits across from me and grandma right beside me. Then she will ask my mum if she needs any help yet: my mum will predictably and consistently answer in the negative. By the time we grab a bite of all these delicacies we are already starting to feel full, yet we continue eating more and more. 

The choice of these particular dishes for breakfast reflects my mum’s American heritage, as well as her Greek cultural influences. American breakfast tends to be a combination of sweet and savoury dishes, whereas the Greek breakfast typically consists of savoury dishes only. As a Greek-American myself, I have a sweet tooth. I could solely survive on eating dessert and that is one of the reasons why I am so drawn to this particular sweet and special breakfast.

All in all, Christmas breakfast is a very special tradition for my family and one that we will continue to cherish. There really is nothing like waking up to the smell of hot pancakes and biscuits and I hope that one day, I too will continue this tradition with my own children.

Former MI6 Chief speaks on Ukraine crisis at Oxford Union

Last night, the Oxford Union welcomed Sir Robert John Sawers, former chief of MI6. Having served as an intelligence officer, diplomat, and civil servant, Sir John was Chief of the Secret Intelligence Service from November 2009 to November 2014. During his tenure, he was a key opponent of the UK government’s decision not to intervene to a greater degree in Syria.

This was Sir John’s first opportunity to speak at the Union. He expressed gratitude for such a large audience despite the “dark and difficult time” the world is currently facing.

When asked how he was recruited to MI6, he revealed that he was given the “infamous tap on the shoulder” by a senior academic at Nottingham. Years later, sitting in the United Nations, he “got a second tap on the shoulder” offering the to be the chief of MI6.

His most intriguing years were his time in South Africa. Here, he learnt that “you can bring about change in world through a combination of pressure, persuasion, association, and leverage without violence”. He holds Nelson Mandela up as the greatest leader of the 20th century.

Reflecting on his time serving under different British Prime Ministers, Sir John was quick to reference their distinctly different personalities. “John Major was at times painstakingly slow at coming to a decision but always got it right. David Cameron was painstakingly quick but often got it wrong. Tony Blair’s position was frantically pro-Israeli at times and didn’t take into consideration wider politics. Gordon Brown did a fantastic job in the biggest financial crisis faced since the 1930s, but found it difficult to keep up with the pace [of being] prime minister.”

When asked if he felt his time as MI6-chief was successful, Sir John answered: “It’s for others to judge, but we certainly made a lot of progress.”

Reflecting on the times in his career he had felt most fearful, he said: “I was most frightened for my own safety in a helicopter in Bosnia, when we were fired at by grenades … I also remember standing in front of the mirror [in Baghdad] doing up my tie and there was this huge explosion, and the mirror shattered in front of me.”

However, in terms of national security, he admits that during his time in public service, “the world was becoming a better place… [the UK] joined the EU and became a dynamic economy, the cold war came to an end, apartheid came to an end… we established a degree of respect in the world.”

Nonetheless, Sir John acknowledged that the world has become a lot more dangerous since he stepped down from his position in MI6, joking that, “It must have something to do with that!”

He refers to three key moments when his heart “dropped” in the last few years: the result of the Brexit referendum, Trump’s election to presidency, and Putin’s march into Ukraine.

Sir John admits that the Russian invasion was not something he had envisaged becoming a reality. “It is a terrible series of events that we’re witnessing… I didn’t think it was in Putin’s interests.”

President Putin, Sir John reflects, is a “cold, calculating man… the harsh reality is that he had this in mind all along. This is Putin’s war”.

Describing Putin’s likely future tactics in Ukraine, he referenced the Vietnam-war era adage, “we had to destroy the village in order to save it”. He hinted that there is a real risk of Kiev being destroyed as the invasion intensifies. He further implied that Putin’s recent fiddling with nuclear levels is a warning to the West, firmly stating that “we must not step across the line and engage with Russia directly”.

Indeed, he warned of the dangers of backing Putin into a corner, saying: “We need to be incredibly careful. We must leave Putin a way out of this”.

Sir John went on to praise the sanctions that the West rapidly imposed on Russia. However, he acknowledged that, “in South Africa, it wasn’t for 12 years until economic pressures resulted in political change… sanctions can be an important weapon but they’re blunt and they’re slow in effect”.

Nonetheless, Sir John Sawer did leave the Union attendees with a positive note: “if there’s one silver lining to the cloud of what’s happening in Ukraine, those who worry about a Chinese attack on Taiwan should see this as less likely now… the Chinese will follow this situation very carefully and be a bit embarrassed by what Russia is doing”.

Image Credit: Laurie Nevay / CC BY-SA 2.0

JUST IN: Magdalen Bridge closed following collision

0

As of 14:59, Magdalen Bridge and the roundabout that gives way to St Clement’s, Cowley, and Iffley is closed after a collision involving a cyclist and a lorry.

Emergency services have attended the scene.

Most traffic into city centre has been halted, with the road from St. Aldate’s up to the High Street and The Plain roundabout closed.

Image: Raymond Knapman/CC BY-SA 2.0 via Geograph