Thursday, May 1, 2025
Blog Page 283

Review – No Time to Die

0

It’s safe to say that No Time to Die has had a difficult journey to the big screen. The film has undergone a change of director (Danny Boyle out, True Detective’s Cary Joji Fukunaga in), an injury to its leading man (though he has at least made it through another Bond alive), rewrites (from Phoebe Waller-Bridge, no less), a global pandemic, and five delays to its release date overall. And yet, the final product has emerged from all of this chaos triumphant – a stylish and exhilarating thriller, dusting itself off and adjusting its shirt cuffs with all the effortless sophistication of its protagonist. No Time to Die could easily have felt stale, considering that we first saw footage of it nearly two years ago. Instead, it’s a breath of fresh air. It already looks set to bring audiences into cinemas in swathes – and deservedly so. 

Fukunaga opens with a horror-infused home invasion markedly different from other Bond pre-credits sequences. It’s a brilliant introduction to Rami Malek’s masked and menacing villain, Lyutsifer Safin. The plot then picks up five years after the events of Spectre, with Craig’s beefcake Bond enjoying retirement in Jamaica (rather like Ian Fleming himself). The set-up feels a little hackneyed: this is the third successive film where Craig has had to do the ‘Bond-past-his-prime’ thing. But this is, of course, just the prelude to the plot’s main action, which doesn’t take long to kick in. Bond’s retirement is interrupted by a plea for help from his old friend, CIA agent Felix Leiter (Jeffrey Wright), which embroils him once again in planet-saving mayhem.

Broadly speaking, the story is far from original. Malek’s villain, of course, has a bio-weapon and a plan to kill millions of people with it. But the plot is, as usual, secondary to the spectacle – and, as has often been the case for Daniel Craig’s time in the role, to the emotional arcs of the main characters. Craig gives a bravura performance, running the gamut from fury to humour to heartbreak. Léa Seydoux is excellent as Madeleine Swann, a woman desperate to remain happy with Bond, but just as haunted by the past as he is. The strength of the performances heightens the effectiveness of the story’s emotional beats. And despite the broadly conventional nature of the plot, there are still some genuinely surprising moments. 

The prospect of a Danny Boyle Bond will always be a tantalising one, but Fukunaga does an excellent job. He knows how to move a camera with real panache – as anyone who has seen that six-minute single take from True Detective will know. There is nothing here to match that (or Spectre’s opening shot), but the action scenes are all breathlessly entertaining, and there is an effectively claustrophobic single-take stairwell fight. It’s a very good-looking film, with each location vividly shot by Fukunaga and cinematographer Linus Sandgren – from the historic beauty of Matera to a murky Norwegian forest.

It’s good to see some stronger roles for women in this entry. Lashana Lynch gives an entertaining turn as new 007 Nomi, with some enjoyably spiky bickering with Bond. Ana de Armas is a lot of fun as the Cuban agent Paloma, and her appearance is the most enjoyable sequence in the film. It’s just a shame we don’t see more of her – and of Naomie Harris’ Moneypenny, for that matter. It would be interesting to know exactly how significant Phoebe Waller-Bridge’s rewrites were, and where they fall in the film; but this is a script which is sharper and funnier than I expected.

The film isn’t perfect. Malek’s Safin never quite lives up to the promise of that creepy pre-credits introduction. The exact motivations behind his plot to kill millions of people are never entirely clear, either. And it’s depressing to see another Bond villain who has facial scarring and a vaguely “European” accent, as if these characteristics are somehow outward indicators of inward evil. These dated tropes are even more noticeable because No Time to Die breaks away from problematic past Bond films in other areas. It would be nice to see a less predictable take on a Bond villain for the next entry in the series. As it stands, we’re on a dark and dangerous road towards having the meerkat from the Compare the Market ads as the main antagonist next time (only if the producers have poked out one of his eyeballs first, of course).

Overall, though, No Time to Die delivers all the exhilarating action, exotic locales and emotional moments you could want from a Bond film – as well as a theme song and opening credits sequence to die for. It’s a bold blend of old and new, and a suitably moving swansong for Daniel Craig. Inevitably, the rumours on who will be his replacement have already kicked into overdrive again. We should take a moment to appreciate, though, just how much he has made this role his own, giving us a 007 as emotionally vulnerable as he is ruthless. I saw the film at a packed screening. Seeing a blockbuster in an environment like that felt like a welcome slice of pre-Covid normality. The producers made the right move in holding out for a theatrical release, however long it took. If you can, see it in cinemas. There may be no time to die, but after a box office opening weekend like that, there’s no doubt you’ll have plenty of time to catch this one on the big screen.

No Time to Die is in cinemas now. 

Summer Stage Round-Up

After over a year off theatres around the country being forced to close their doors, curtains finally rose again over the summer. To start off the term, the Cherwell Stage team and friends reflect on their favourite shows from over the summer…

Joseph and the Amazing Technicolour Dreamcoat, London Palladium

The musical spectacular returns to the West End in a colourful blur of tap dance, belting and glitter. In this new staging from director Laurence Connor, a talented child cast joins Alexandra Burke as the Narrator, recent grad Jac Yarrow as Joseph, and Jason Donovan as the Pharaoh. With impressive set design and choreography, I found it to be a joyful celebration of musical theatre as a genre. 

Is God Is, Royal Court Theatre 

Is God Is is a genre bending exploration of the impact of domestic abuse. It was half revenge tragedy, half Western thriller – it was one of the most gripping pieces of theatre I’ve ever seen. I was also lucky enough to sit in the front row, and the intense heat of the real life flames onstage made me feel like I was genuinely part of the play landscape itself. Royal Court do fab £12 tickets for Under 26, which I very much recommend!

The Last 5 Years, Garrick Theatre

In this production, Jason Robert Brown’s emotional two-hander musical is reimagined around a revolving grand piano. The show tells the story of the same relationship from two perspectives moving in opposite directions – this show sees the parts of Cathy and Jamie taken on by actor-musicians Molly Lynch and Oli Higginson, bringing something new to the characters.

Carousel, Regent’s Park Open Air Theatre

This extraordinary revival gave the Rogers and Hammerstein classic new life. The breathtaking reorchestration by Tom Deering gave a new and surprising impact to the well-known score. Relocated in a northern English fishing town, the production lent into the heavy, dark and bleak elements of the show. The juxtaposition of the grim and heartbreaking with that soaring elegant score made the show work in a way I never expected. Part of me has always felt the musical can veer a little close to romanticising its abusive relationships, but with overwhelming music and some stunning performances, this production resonated with a defiant, emotional message (one of solidarity in the face of abuse and hardship). It is lovely to see theatre reset after so long, but it is inspiring to see it revive and attempt to do better.

Camp Siegfried, The Old Vic 

Camp Siegfried featured a stunning performance from Patsy Ferran as a child at a Nazi indoctrination Spring Awakening-esque summer camp, coming to terms with her sexuality and the pressures of conforming to the racist ideology. The play was also beautifully directed by Katy Rudd in a verb minimalist style – my only criticism was at times the writing was slightly heavy handed, drawing out the parallels between 1930s Germany and Trumpland America a little too explicitly. 

Sunnymead Court, Arcola Theatre

There may be lots of large-scale musicals on the West End right now, but that doesn’t mean new writing isn’t out there. In this refreshing small-scale short play, writer Gemma Lawrence tells a new kind of love story – the show is set on two balconies during London’s first coronavirus lockdown, as two women meet eyes from their flats in the middle of summer. I really hope to see it produced on a larger scale!

Diana: The Musical

The past few years have been somewhat of a high-point for movie musicals. From Tom Hooper’s 2019 adaptation of Cats, to the recent release of Kay Cannon’s Cinderella, as well as the release of Lin-Manuel Miranda’s Hamilton, which was filmed in 2016 and only released last year on Disney Plus, stage shows keep finding their way onto our screens.

The infamous story of Prince Charles and Princess Diana is no exception to this rule, with a musical adaptation of Diana’s story being released on Netflix.

Titled Diana: The Musical, the production certainly seems to be playing on the Diana hype after Emma Corrin’s portrayal of the Princess on series four of The Crown. Diana: The Musical, however, follows a different trend to many of the movie musicals which have come onto our screens in recent years. Whilst Hamilton, Cats, and Cinderella all had made names for themselves before being on screen (either as stage-shows or literature), Diana: The Musical has yet to have a proper theatrical run.

The show has been filmed in a theatre with no audience, seemingly recreating the feel of a real theatre show for a mid-pandemic online audience. Yet, this approach seems to fall flat; whilst the release of Hamilton last year was greatly anticipated and brought back the nostalgia of being in a theatre, now that theatres in the US and the UK are open, many are eager to get back to watching shows in person. Furthermore, the ill-fated story of Diana is perhaps, at this point, slightly overdone, with a film starring Kristen Stewart, titled Spencer, being released in November.

The release of this musical also raises questions about the nature of the movie musical. Do they take away from the real enjoyment of watching a show? Are stage musicals even suited to the very different media of film and television? Reviews of Diana: The Musical certainly suggest otherwise, with the show being universally panned by critics.

Contributions by Ollie Khurshid, James Newbery, Katie Kirkpatrick, and Maebh Howell.

Image Credit: Beth Scott

The four-day working week: A new way forward?

0

Imagine working reduced hours over a four-day week and having a three day weekend, every week.  

It seems like a radical idea, one that is far removed from the current obsession with grind and hustle culture which praises having little to no work-life balance as the ultimate manifestation of a ‘successful’ young professional. But, in the aftermath of the pandemic, could the four-day working week be the perfect solution to maximise productivity and worker satisfaction? 

In essence, the four-day working week would mean that employees would work reduced hours without a cut in pay. As we emerge from the pandemic which saw millions of people forced to work from home for nearly two years, this may be a welcome change. Working from home over such a long period of time made a lot of employers realise that their companies can function without employees being on site and many have continued working from home despite restrictions being lifted. This means working practice has changed monumentally since the beginning of 2020. The four-day working week may be the next natural progression as the pandemic and multiple lockdowns gave people time to reflect on their lifestyles, with many realising that they need to prioritise their mental health and well-being by achieving a more rounded work-life balance. The four-day working week would provide employees with more free time outside of work, with no loss in pay. It seems like the next best step for governments and businesses to take if they would like to sustain a happy and motivated working population following such difficult and precarious times.  

But is there any proof that the four-day working week actually achieves anything? Well, between 2015 and 2019, the national government in Iceland conducted a study which saw 1% of its working population, across a variety of sectors, be given a reduction of weekly hours. The experiment was a huge success as it saw an increase in productivity, well-being and workplace morale. It also led to long-term changes as a large majority of the current working population now works permanently reduced hours. 

Elsewhere, the company Unilever also carried out an experiment in which it made its employees in New Zealand work for four days without pay reductions. Again, this test had a positive outcome as employees got 20% more work done and they reported their stress levels to be dramatically lower. Off the back of these experiments, other countries such as Spain, Ireland and Scotland are also trialling four-day workweeks, encouraged by the positive outcomes both economically and in terms of worker welfare. 

So it seems that many countries are enchanted by the prospect of a four-day working week. This does not mean, however, that it is the perfect solution across all economies and sectors, such as healthcare or hospitality. With the implementation of a four-day working week, many businesses and companies would still expect their employees to carry out the same amount of work as a 40 hour week. This would mean drastically changing working practices to maximise efficiency and prevent office workers, for example, having to go home and continue working in order to keep up with the workload. Such a change would need time to implement into different business models and is not something to be taken lightly.  

Despite this, as we leave the pandemic behind, there is no doubt that we have learnt a lot about working practice. Economists use ‘productivity’ or the ability to produce a certain amount of goods and services per hour as a tool to forecast economic growth. So in order for employers to be persuaded by reduced hours it may be important to reconsider the ways in which we work. At Microsoft Japan, meetings were capped at 30 minutes to ensure that they were as efficient and effective as possible. This idea of efficiency is something that has gained momentum during and after the pandemic as many people have realised that many things can be communicated and achieved simply over an e-mail or short message.

Another consequence of the pandemic is also an increased importance on well-being and mental health. If the working week is more productive but less strenuous in terms of hours and physical hours spent in the office, employee well-being is more likely to improve. A three-day weekend also gives employees more free time to spend with family or pursue hobbies. The four-day week would work particularly well in corporate sectors, sectors in which graduates report quickly experiencing burnout just a few years after getting their first job.

The feeling of control over our schedules and lives outside work is definitely something that everyone wants regardless of what stage of their career that they’re at and as the various experiments across the globe show, the four-day working week can provide just that. Many changes are on the horizon after the pandemic and perhaps the biggest one should be the way in which we work. It’s never been more appropriate to look after ourselves holistically and a big part of this will come from striking a good balance between our professional and social lives.

Image: Martin Vorel

Matt Hancock, Gavin Williamson, and Sir Roger Penrose among speakers at Oxford societies this term

0

A number of interesting speakers have been announced to speak at various Oxford societies. Speakers include politicians, acclaimed writers, and Nobel Prize-winning scientists. Most events are open to anyone interested for free.

The Oxford University Conservative Association announced that Matt Hancock and Gavin Williamson will both be speaking this Michaelmas term.

Gavin Williamson was Education Secretary from 2019 to this year, most notably during the A level results scandal in 2020. He will be speaking on the 4th November.

Matt Hancock will speak on the 18th November. Hancock served as Health Secretary for the first year of the coronavirus pandemic before resigning after being caught breaking social distancing rules with his aide.

On the 2nd November Sir Roger Penrose, winner of the 2020 Nobel Prize in Physics, will give an online talk to the Oxford University Physics society.

In the 6th week of Michaelmas Term, the Oxford Diplomatic Society have invited a panel of ambassadors from countries hit worst by climate change to discuss the outcomes of the COP26 summit.

Oxford Women in Business have invited André Borschberg, CoFounder of the Solar Impulse project. This project involved completing the first round-the-world flight on a solar-powered aeroplane.

The Oxford University Labour Club have invited Wes Streeting, Shadow Secretary of State for Child Poverty to speak in the 5th week of term. Tan Dhesi MP will speak in the 7th week of this term.

Hosts of the Hurly Burly Shakespeare Show, Jess Hamlet and Aubrey Whitlock will speak online to the Oxford University Media Society about the making of their hit podcast. The podcast was founded in 2017, and discusses a play of Shakespeare or one of his contemporaries every week.

Judy Smith, Kirsten Walkcolm, and Jack Kelly will also be speaking to the Oxford University Media Society. Smith and Walkcolm are President and Executive vice-President of the strategic advisory firm Smith and Company. Jack Kelly is founder of TLDR news UK.

On the 3rd November Cornelia Funke, bestselling children’s author of Inkheart and Dragonrider, will speak online for the Oxford University German Society about her life between Germany and the US, as well as on her new Artists in Residence centre.

Alexander Weber, chief growth officer at one of Germany’s most successful start-ups N26 will speak to the Oxford University German Society.

Robert Watson, chair of the IPBES (Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem services for the UN) will give a talk on making peace with nature on the 25th October for the Oxford Biological society.

British mathematician Kevin Buzzard will speak to the Oxford University Mathematics Society on the 2nd November.

Dr Karen Miga, leading genomics expert at the Telomere-toTelomere Consortium will talk about their grassroots effort to complete the mapping of a human genome for the Oxford Biology Society.

Dr Baland Jalal, a researcher at Harvard University, will talk about dreams and sleep paralysis to the Oxford Psychology society, the time is yet to be confirmed. The event is free for members and £2 for the public.

Image: Number 10 / CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 via Flickr

Interviews to be online for second year running

0

Admission interviews for 2022-23 entry will be held online at the end of this year for the second year running. This comes as there are still various uncertainties concerning COVID-19 going into the winter. 

Online interviews will take place on Microsoft Teams. Some applicants may require touch screen devices or a basic universal stylus for their interviews.

The University stresses that “no candidate or their school will be expected to purchase a touchscreen device in order to participate”.  In cases where candidates or schools are not able to meet the University’s technology requirements, “colleges will discuss alternative arrangements” to find a solution. 

Interviews are expected to take place throughout December. This would be in accordance with interview timings of other years.

All candidates are instructed to have some plain paper and a pen, access to pre-reading for the interview, and a copy of their personal statement.  Some candidates may be asked to use interactive tools during their interviews. Some tools include adding text to shared platforms between the interviewer and the candidate, using ‘draw’ tools to highlight work or annotate work, and sketching diagrams or writing formulae.

The extent of technology an applicant is required to have will depend on which course they are applying to. Technology requirements have been divided into three separate tiers. 

In tier 1, candidates will only need a computer, with speakers, a microphone, and a webcam. Some of the courses in this tier include Biology, English Language and Literature, and Medicine. 

In tier 2, candidates will need access to an Interactive Virtual Whiteboard, in addition to a computer. The Virtual Whiteboard will be accessed through the website or app Miro. The University advises that student access Miro on the same device as that which they are accessing Microsoft Teams. Some of the courses in this category include Music, Economics and Management, and Biochemistry. 

In tier 3, candidates are required to access an Interactive Virtual Whiteboard via Miro and Natural Handwriting Capture using a basic universal stylus. For applicants to be able to use the basic universal stylus, they will need to have a large touchscreen device. Candidates may be asked to sketch diagrams and write out mathematical notations using a stylus. Courses requiring the use of a stylus and a touchscreen device include Chemistry, Engineering, and Mathematics. 

It is still unclear as to whether interviews for 2023-24 entry will be online again, or whether they will return to being in-person. Announcements will likely be made in the new year.

Image: Ninara/ CC BY 2.0 via flickr

Oxford Brookes plan for new student accommodation rejected again

0

Oxford City Council have voted to reject a planning application submitted by Oxford Brookes University for the redevelopment of their student accommodation.

This is now the second time such an application has been rejected, despite the recommendation of the Council’s planning officers that the Council approve the application. In 2019 a similar plan was rejected unanimously by the council, with concerns raised especially over the height of the new buildings.

This time the Council was split, with four councillors voting in favour of approving the plan, and seven voting against. This delays the implementation of what the council set out in its ‘Oxford Local Plan 2036’, which intends to make the number of Oxford Brookes students living in private accommodation less than 4000.

The proposed plan would increase the number of students able to live on-campus in the Clive Booth Student Village, from the current 640 to around 1200, as estimated by the Local Democracy Reporting Service. The current buildings would be demolished, and twelve new ones built, each with six stories.

The Council had concerns that some of the accommodation, now approaching 30 years old, is outdated, and by moving more Brookes students, space at private accommodation would be freed up for Oxford residents.

However, the residents of the area raised concerns over the proposed height of the buildings and the over-shadowing of residential property that it would cause. Objections were also raised on the grounds that more students in the
area, and therefore greater footfall, would impact negatively on the nearby Headington Hill Conservation Area.

Tessa Hennessy, secretary of the New Marston Residents Association, commented to the Oxford Mail that “[Oxford Brookes University] did not take on local concerns from the webinars they held, and they came back with a set of plans… virtually the same as the last plans and it’s right that they’ve been thrown out again.”

The plans were slightly modified to reduce the height of some of the buildings and avoid overshadowing of allotments, and between the applications the university has submitted separate plans to improve the pedestrian link between the student village and the Headington Hill campus.

The university has said it “has reflected carefully on the questions and issues raised by the local community” and made “significant changes and improvements”. They say the benefits of the redevelopment for the local community include “helping to reduce pressure on local housing supply”, “helping to educe pressure on local transport systems” and “helping to provide improved facilities for Oxford Brookes University Nursery.”

There is certainly tension between the Council and its planning department, with Adrian Arnold, head of planning, telling the BBC that this rejection could result in a successful appeal, and there is a “high risk of costs being awarded against us.”

For now, however, Oxford Brookes is biding its time. They are “disappointed” at the decision, but “will now consider next steps in relation to this proposed redevelopment”.

Image credits: CC BY-SA 2.0

Oxford University launches new Oxford Pakistan Programme

0

Oxford University recently launched a major new initiative in education and public diplomacy. The Oxford-Pakistan Programme aims to increase and promote Pakistan-related activities at the University. Largely the invention of Oxford professor Adeel Malik, Dr Talha J. Pirzada, lecturer in material sciences, and Haroon Zaman, Oxford University graduate and former president of the Oxford Pakistan Society, the OPP will include various scholarships for graduate students, special lectures on Pakistan, visiting fellowships specifically for Pakistani faculty members, and the addition of a second Rhodes Scholarship for Pakistan.

Several new scholarships were announced at the OPP launch, which took place on 31st September at the Pakistan High Commission in London. Nobel laureate and Oxford graduate Malala Yousafzai announced the creation of a new scholarship allowing one Pakistani girl from an underprivileged background to study at Oxford each year. Mr Ahmed Owais Pirzada also announced the Jamal Scholarship in memory of Dr Ahmed Bilal Shah, a leading Pakistani doctor in Zimbabwe. Dr Tariq Zaman, orthopaedic surgeon and honorary senior lecturer at Imperial College, announced an annual graduate scholarship for Pakistani and British Pakistani students.

The program has already received strong support from prominent figures and organizations across the globe. Both the British High Commission in Islamabad and the High Commission for Pakistan in London pledged their support to the programme, as have many prominent members of the Oxford community. Thus far, the OPP has garnered over £500,000 in pledges for its first phase for the next five years. These funds have come primarily from Pakistani businessmen and important figures in the Pakistani diaspora in the UK.

Several key leaders in British and Pakistani politics praised the OPP for its strengthening the academic link between the UK and Pakistan. The OPP comes on the heels of a similar initiative implemented by Jesus College earlier this year to support year 12 British Bangladeshi and Pakistani students in their application process. The programme at Jesus College and the OPP reveal a growing concern for Pakistani representation at the University and an increased effort to unite the nations through education.

The university is currently in the process of finalizing all components of the Oxford-Pakistan Programme, but it is expected to go live in the coming months with the scholarships becoming active in October 2022.

Image Credit: Oxford University / CC-BY-SA-4.0

BREAKING: Allegations of financial and interpersonal misconduct lodged against OUCA President

Cherwell can reveal that complaints have been made to the Disciplinary Committee against the President of the Oxford University Conservative Association, accusing them of financial misconduct and abusive behaviour towards other officers. They are also accused of violating a number of terms in the rules of the Association, including those that govern threatening to bring disrepute to the society, failure to fulfil duties of office, and abusive behaviour towards other officeholders attempting to fulfil their duties. 

The complaint alleges that the President made eight unauthorised transactions on the Conservative Association’s debit card between July 23rd and April 17th, totalling £76.50.

The rules which govern the expenditures by the association state that the President “shall be permitted to hold a debit card linked to the Association’s bank account for the purposes of paying for Association expenditure”. The complainant claims that by making these transactions, the President breached several clauses related to the Association’s finances, which is grounds for disciplinary conduct.

The complaint claims that the President “attempted to downplay the severity of his actions” by saying that he reimbursed the account “as soon as he was made aware of the payments he had made”. According to an audio recording submitted as evidence, after being asked when the money was paid back, the President said it was only repaid after the Treasurer saw the account’s bank statements. The complainant says that because the bank statements were not received until after the Association’s 0th week Council, “the President was not telling the truth”.

The documents claim that the President tried to “justify his mistake” by saying that they taps their wallet to complete contactless payments. He is alleged to have said this during the 2nd week Council meeting. The complainant said that although this “may not have been done with malicious intent”, that did not excuse the matter since the President could have removed the Association’s debit card to prevent accidental contactless transactions.

The complainant says that by using the Association debit card for personal expenses, the President has “substantially failed to fulfil his duties” and “committed actions which may serve to bring the Association into disrepute. 

Following the claims of financial misconduct, the complainant goes on to describe behaviour by the President that they describe as “abusive”. Part of the document is dedicated to the election of the non-executive officer roles at the start of Michalemas term. Members were invited to elect officers to the role, and when a candidate that the complainant claims the President favoured was not elected, they began “raising his voice and shouting across council in a very intimidating manner that he was incredibly ashamed of the committee for how they had voted, that the way they voted was unacceptable and that there is no choice for him but to keep bringing the motion back every single week this term until he gets his way.” 

The complainant goes on to suggest that “Following this council meeting, I received multiple screenshots from people receiving messages from [the President] demanding to know who they voted for”. Cherwell has seen messages that appear to corroborate this claim, as well as messages that appear to threaten the complainant prior to the election. The complainant suggested that this particular set of events demonstrated misconduct under parts of the society’s section 5(1)(a), a set of terms governing disciplinary misconduct that includes behaviour that might bring the society into disrepute, failure to fulfil duties of office, breach of the University’s Integrated Equality and Diversity Policy, and abusive behaviour towards other officeholders.

Furthermore, the complaint alleges that the President showed “appalling disorganisation”, which led to events including the Fresher’s Drinks and a Wine, Cheese and Poker social being postponed. It says that the President’s “negligent behaviour” was “incredibly embarrassing for the Association”. One incident cited took place in first week, when the location of a speaker event with Colonel Richard Kemp CBE “kept changing right until the last meeting”, leading to confusion of whether it would take place on the main-site of Exeter College or in Cohen Quad, and a low turnout of attendees.

The full findings of the disciplinary procedures will be released next week.

The President was approached for comment, but declined due to OUCA rules preventing committee members from speaking to the press.

Image Credit: Oxford University Conservative Association / CC BY-SA 4.0

Oxford Union announces response to Equality and Access Report

0

The Oxford Union has released a public response to an Equality and Access report, which recommends that the society adopt a series of reforms to improve their procedures and governance.

The report was commissioned after Ebenezer Azamati, a graduate student from Ghana who is also blind, was forcibly removed from the chamber in 2019, and had proceedings brought against him for “violence and dishonesty”. The proceedings were dropped, and Mr Azamati settled with the Union out-of-court. Brendan McGrath, the then President of the Union, resigned following the scandal.

Doughty Street Chambers carried out an analysis of the Union’s rules and practices, and produced a report listing 81 recommendations for the society to implement. The Union accepts 77 recommendations “in their entirety”, and “all 81 in some form”. Some of the reforms will need to face a vote from members of the society.

An executive summary of the report, cosigned by the Union President Chengkai Xie, and President-Elect Molly Mantle, was announced in the chamber before a debate on the motion “this house would give up liberty for safety” was held.

“The recommendations have provided us with much useful insight and the valuable opportunity to examine our practices and procedures. There is a real appetite for reform amongst committee members and we look forward to implementing these changes. We understand that alongside implementing immediate changes, we must commit to long term action and will be patient whilst we achieve it,” the summary said.

Section four advised the Union on how to use the Equality Act 2010 “as a basis for procedure”. The Union said they would do so, and introduce “impact assessments as a basis for future decision making.

The Union said they accepted “all recommendations” in the report to create a “welcoming and inclusive culture”. This is set to begin by adopting a “new statement of expected standards of behaviour”, which would be implemented in conjunction with reforms to their disciplinary procedures.

The report also advised the Union on how to make the leadership of the society “more accessible”, and provided a series of recommendations for committee members. The Union said that committee members already undergo “mandatory training”, but accepted recommendations made in the report such as moving training to an earlier point in term and expanding its content.

Section 10 of the report focussed on the experiences of members and guests. This included a review of how accessible the Union is to disabled people, and recommended that the membership fee structure should be removed. The Union said they are “taking steps to restructure [their] membership”, including highlighting the option to pay the membership fee of £286.34 in instalments.

Section 10 also recommended that the Union produces a new “consideration of how events with ‘controversial’ speakers may effect the experience of members”. The union said they have “begun discussing the best way to restructure our invitations process, in order to better assess the impact speakers may have”.

The report also recommended that the Union implement a variety of policy changes to “improve the working environment for the Society’s paid staff”. The Union said they would work with stakeholders to create these policies, and ensure they were in line with wider equality and access aims.

President of the Oxford Union, Chengkai Xie, told Cherwell: “Many members will recall the events of Michaelmas Term 2019 surrounding the mistreatment of Mr Ebenezer Azamati, which led to significant public criticism of the Union and the resignation of the then-President. That did not showcase the Union at its best. We have reflected on our practices. 

“Following the incident and the subsequent proceedings, the Union commissioned an in-depth review of our rules and practices by experienced barristers.  Recognising the significance of the review, we are making the Executive Summary of the report, containing all the recommendations, fully available on our website.  I am tonight also pleased to be able to announce the publication of our official statement responding to the review.  We wholeheartedly welcome the review and have already begun addressing many of the problems it identifies.  

“Some of the changes we hope to implement will require the support of this House.  I would now like to ask you for that support, as we look to the future.  I hope that you will be compelled by our commitment to reform when these improvements are brought to a vote.  

“I thank my committee for their vigour and contribution. I especially owe my debt of gratitude to my successor Molly Mantle, my Development Officer Amy Gregg, the Most Senior Deputy Returning Officer Eden Smith, and the Ex-Returning Officer, Daniel Dalland for their continuous support. 
I am excited to be President at this time of change. I will dedicate my term of office to making the Union a more inclusive and welcoming place.”

Image Credit: NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organisation / CC BY-NC-ND 2.0

Oxford4Nature to hold Alice in Wonderland themed Protest

0

Climate action group Oxford4Nature will demonstrate in Oxford city centre this Saturday, dressed as Alice in Wonderland characters. The protestors will meet from 12 noon in Broad Street, before making their way through the City Centre.

The Alice in Wonderland theme has been chosen to represent the ‘madness’ of not taking action. Each character draws attention to a different issue. Alice herself will symbolise the children whose futures are endangered by the climate crisis.

Other characters present at the protest will include The Cheshire Cat, the White Rabbit and the Mad Hatter.

This protest aims to draw attention to the lack of climate policy from Oxford City Council. Speaking with Cherwell, Lucy Grabe-Watson, founder of Oxford4Nature, said, “We will be demanding that the council put the climate and biodiversity emergency at the heart of all decisions and policies.”

More specifically, campaigners will demand that all new public transport is net zero emissions, and that green spaces are only developed when brownfield site alternatives have been exhausted.

Oxford4Nature was established in August, with previous protests held in August and September. Its members come from XR, Friends of the Earth, Only One Oxford, and other smaller campaigns.

The campaign’s first two protests were in opposition to the plans of Oxford City Council to develop in several green places in the city, including a field off Meadow Lane in Iffley Village, and land off Mill Lane in Marston.

This is in line with one of the campaign’s key aims: to put the climate and ecological emergencies at the centre of decision making.

Nuala Young, from Oxford, protested earlier this year to save Redbridge Meadow from development. She said the council wasn’t doing enough to tackle climate change.

Ms Young particularly criticised the lack of green spaces in the city. She said, “Oxford City Council has declared an Ecological Emergency, while at the same time shrinking its biodiverse base of the Green Belt and even, at Redbridge, blocking the important biodiversity corridor that until now runs through the city.”

Oxford City Council has given a 2040 deadline for Net Zero Carbon emissions. However, research suggests that serious action is needed before 2030.

Oxford4Nature’s key aims within the social justice sphere include ensuring affordable net zero carbon housing close to the city centre, as well as affordable net zero transport options.

This social justice aim also includes making locally grown affordable food more readily available, and retaining local accessible green spaces.”

Other broader aims of the campaign include using ‘doughnut’ economics to reframe how the city is run.

As part of this, Oxford4Nature aim to review the Oxfordshire 2050 Plan, which forms part of the Future Oxfordshire Partnership Housing & Growth Deal.

The campaign also hopes to work collaboratively with local experts and communities and reuse, recycle and regenerate.

The climate protest on Saturday will form part of Oxford4Nature’s mission to give back control to local communities by lobbying decision makers in the city to act against the climate crisis.

Image: Special Collections Toronto Public Library/CC BY-SA 2.0 via flickr.com