Friday, May 9, 2025
Blog Page 360

Former judge criticises Magdalen President for role in anti-gay litigation

0

TW: homophobia

Magdalen’s President, Dinah Rose QC, has been criticised for advocating on behalf of the Caymanian government in its struggle against the legalisation of same-sex marriage.

Rose, a leading human rights lawyer previously praised as “the best discrimination lawyer in the country”, represented the Caymanian government in their successful appeal of a judgment that had legalised same-sex marriage in the Cayman Islands in 2019. The case has since been appealed to the Privy Council in the UK, where Rose is expected to advocate on behalf of the Caymanian government as it resists the legalisation of same-sex marriage next month, despite pleas within legal circles for her to reconsider her involvement.

In a statement sent to LGBTQ+ representatives at Oxford, Edwin Cameron, a former member of the South African Constitutional Court and gay rights activist, has criticised Rose’s advocacy for the Caymanian government. Cameron, while endorsing “the obvious principle that even unpopular causes and litigants deserve legal counsel”, expressed his “distress and dismay that Ms Dinah Rose QC, the new President of Magdalen, is lead counsel on behalf of the government of the Cayman Islands in litigation that seeks to deny equality for LGBTIQ people.”

One LGBTQ+ identifying Magdalen student told Cherwell: “Obviously I’m disheartened by this news as all of us in college had high hopes for her presidency. I still hope that she doesn’t hold any homophobic views personally and I’d like to hear a statement from her to clarify her position on it”. 

Another stated: “I’m shocked and disappointed to hear of Dinah Rose’s involvement in this case. I feel this is incompatible with her role as the President of the College and with her duties to LGBTQ+ students”. 

The Case; The Deputy Registrar of the Cayman Islands and the Attorney General of the Cayman Islands v Day (Chantelle) and Bush (Vickie Bodden) CICA No. 9 of 2019

The initial case was brought by Ms Day and her partner Ms Bush, who filed a lawsuit against the Caymanian government seeking to overturn the ban on same-sex marriage. The government, represented by a colleague of Rose’s, unsuccessfully attempted to defeat the lawsuit in court. Chief Justice Smellie, who presided over the case, found in favour of Day and Bush. His ruling effectively legalised same-sex marriage in the Cayman Islands.

However, a rapid appeal by the Caymanian government granted a stay of judgment that prevented any same-sex marriages from going ahead. Advocating on behalf of the government in the Court of Appeals (CoA), Rose argued against the ruling that had legalised same-sex marriage on behalf of the Caymanian government. In August 2019, she successfully persuaded the court that Smellie’s original judgment lacked merit, securing a total withdrawal of both the ruling that had briefly legalised same-sex marriage in the Cayman Islands.

Day and Bush immediately appealed the decision. Their case will now be heard before the Privy Council in the United Kingdom on 23 February 2021, where Rose intends to represent the Caymanian government. 

Edwin Cameron, the current President of Stellenbosch University, appealed to the College’s history in his statement: “Magdalen is the college of Oscar Wilde”, he wrote, “it is appalling that, 125 years after Wilde’s persecution, trial and imprisonment, the President of his college can ally herself with those who seek to persecute LGBTIQ persons in the Caribbean by denying them equal rights.

“The Magdalen President’s role in this litigation”, he continued, “is a stain upon the college. Worse, it is a fearsome source of apprehension and stigma to young LGBTIQ people who seek to find a haven of security and safety and dignity at Oxford and in Magdalen.” 

He also argued that “there is a direct line between homophobic conduct like that of the Caymans government and the terrifying levels of violence and brutality that, even now, are being perpetrated against LGBTIQ people in neighbouring Jamaica (one of the most homophobic societies in the world).”

“The litigation Ms Rose QC leads”, he continued, “forms part of and actively reinforces the continuum of violence against LGBTIQ people throughout the Caribbean. It sends the same damaging, humiliating and stigmatizing message to the LGBTIQ community of Oxford and Magdalen: you are not equal, and I will not protect and defend your right to dignity.

“I ask that Ms Rose QC return her brief. And, if she cannot, I ask that she accept that her continued prosecution of the case is radically incompatible with the promises she undertook when she became President of Magdalen.

“In addition, I call upon Ms Rose QC to donate her brief fees she has already taken from the homophobic government of the Caymans to a cause or shelter protecting Caribbean people from homophobic violence.      

In his time on the South African legal circuit, Cameron was instrumental in the inclusion of sexual orientation as a protected characteristic in the Bill of Rights. He has received a Special Award from the Bar of England and Wales for his contribution to international jurisprudence, and he continues to advocate globally for LGBTQ+ causes. The full text of his statement is available here.

Art historian and Christ Church alumnus Kevin Childs has also criticised Rose’s continued advocacy for the Caymanian government, arguing that “once Ms Rose became President of Magdalen she assumed responsibilities and duties to Magdalen’s students and staff and Magdalen’s commitment to equality. Her duties are now to the LGBT students and staff of Magdalen, not the homophobic government of the Cayman Islands.”

“By acting to deny two women the right to marry,” Childs opined, “the President of Magdalen has made Magdalen an unsafe place for LGBT people.”

Dinah Rose responded to the accusations stating: “As a barrister, I am subject to professional obligations enforced by the Bar Standards Board. These include a duty to accept briefs without regard to the acceptability of the views or positions of my clients, and to represent clients without regard to external pressure. I also have a duty not to withdraw from cases that I have already accepted, and always to put the best interests of my clients first.”

She continued, saying: “It is not correct that there is no legal framework to protect the rights of same-sex couples in the Cayman Islands. Civil partnerships which provide legal rights equivalent to marriage are available to both same-sex and opposite-sex couples there”. Civil partnerships were made legal in the Cayman Islands in September 2020. Caymanian Colours, a Caymanian LGBTQ+ rights group, has argued that this is “a significant step forward for all of the Caribbean region and the Cayman Islands”, it falls short of providing full equality to same-sex couples.

Rose elaborated: “The hearing is imminent, and my clients would be very significantly prejudiced if I were to withdraw. It would be an act of serious professional misconduct for me to do so, for which I could expect to receive a severe penalty.

She stated: “I have argued a number of cases which have advanced LGBTQ+ rights, including a recent landmark case in Hong Kong winning equal rights to employment visas for same-sex couples. Later this year, also in Hong Kong, I will be arguing in favour of the right of trans people to change the birth-assigned gender recorded on their identity cards.”

Magdalen College, according to its website, “aims to provide an inclusive environment which promotes equality, values diversity, and maintains a working, learning and social environment in which the rights and dignity of all its staff and students are respected.” Rose herself posted a picture of the trans flag flying at Magdalen in November 2020 with the caption “proud to fly the flag for trans awareness week”.

In an advertisement for the role of President, Magdalen explicitly stated that it “welcomes applications from women and men worldwide, and is committed to equality, diversity, and improving opportunities for fair access to higher education.”  Cameron picked up on this in his statement, arguing that “The President of Magdalen owes a duty to the college as well as to its LGBTIQ members to uphold Magdalen’s equality policy. Choosing to deploy professional energies on behalf of a homophobic government is incompatible with this duty.”

Rose told Cherwell: “Magdalen College stands firmly by its commitment to equality, diversity and inclusion, and strives to maintain an environment in which the rights and dignity of all its staff and students are respected.

“I have made my own commitment to support Magdalen in achieving these aims a central theme of my presidency. I am working with the Fellowship, student body, and staff to promote even greater diversity and inclusion within the College Community, and to enhance welfare provision in College.

“There is no conflict between this commitment and the performance of my legal and ethical duties as a barrister in this case.”

Cameron, in contrast, highlighted the example of Mr David Perry QC, who recently returned a brief he had accepted to prosecute human rights campaigners in Hong Kong following criticism from leading politicians and lawyers, in his email to Oxford University LGBTQ+ students. Cameron argues that Rose, in line with her commitment to Magdalen College and its students, should do the same. 

In response to this matter, the Oxford University LGBTQ+ Society’s Executive Committee told Cherwell: “We are deeply alarmed and disappointed at the involvement of an Oxford College head in a case advancing an outrightly homophobic cause. We concur with former judge Cameron that if she has the choice to drop the case, it would seem appropriate for her to do so. 

“It is paramount to ensure  that  LGBTQ+ students at Magdalen and in Oxford see that she upholds her duty of care towards LGBTQ+ students and the values enshrined in Magdalen’s Equality Policy. Continuing the case would be furthering those voices in the world who continuously question the rights and dignity of LGBTQ+ individuals. If it is true that she still has the choice to step down from this case, we strongly encourage this. Otherwise we cannot see how she can continue as President of the College. If any LGBTQ+ students have any welfare or other issues related to this matter, please do reach out to one of our Welfare Officers at [email protected] or [email protected].” 

For confidential advice and support, you can contact Switchboard at 0300 330 0630, 10am to 10pm, every day, or email them at [email protected]. All phone operators are LGBTQ+.

ONS survey finds students’ mental health has worsened since autumn 2020

0

The Student COVID-19 Insights Survey (SCIS) from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) has found that students’ wellbeing has worsened since November 2020.

Average life satisfaction, measured out of 10, has fallen by 9% to 4.8 compared to 5.3 in November. Self-reported anxiety levels remained unchanged for students, but at 5.2 out of 10 students report a statistically significantly higher level of anxiety than the general population (4.2). 63% of students reported that their mental health had been negatively affected, compared to 57% when last surveyed. The ONS identified this change as being of particular significance.

Students also reported increasing dissatisfaction with their academic experience compared to November 2020, rising from 29% to 37%. However, 85% of students said they were either “extremely likely” or “likely” to continue their studies.

Tim Gibbs, from the ONS Public Services Analysis Team, commented: “These numbers are not surprising considering the new lockdown measures in place and the fact that many students have not yet returned to their university town or city. This is also reflected in the academic experience scores, with the number of students reporting dissatisfaction showing an increase since the last report.”

The SCIS also analysed the travel patterns of students and whether they had returned to university in-person at the start of 2021. At the end of 2020, 33% of students left university accommodation to spend the holiday with family or friends. Of this portion, 40% have since returned to university accommodation. Out of the 60% who have not returned, 32% reported not knowing when they would return to university, and 14% said they were not planning to return this term.

The ONS has cautioned that care must be taken when interpreting the findings of the SCIS, due to the small sample size of students who responded. Out of 100,000 invitations to participate, only 2,698 complete responses were received between January 8th-18th. Although the ONS have weighted their data to be representative of students studying at English universities, the small sample size has introduced an element of uncertainty into their findings. This includes using confidence intervals to determine whether differences in data compared to November 2020 are statistically significant.

Image: Tim Gouw via unsplash.com

Local jeweller asks for lockdown love stories

0

Beaverbrooks Jewellery Store has announced they are looking for the ‘most romantic’ lockdown love stories, and in return they will give away a memorable date night, asking for couples to “tell us your Lockdown Love Story for your chance to win a £1,000 date night”.

The website goes on to state: “We want to shine a light on the unlikely love stories that have emerged during the most challenging times, whether it’s a new relationship that blossomed over a Zoom quiz, or an unlikely relationship that formed while volunteering or while working on the front line.”

The prize is a diamond date night that will include a piece of jewellery for both individuals, as well as a dine in meal for two including wine, flowers and chocolate.

Beaverbrooks Jewellery Store also has a plan for couples who don’t live together or aren’t in a support bubble, who “will also get the chance to enjoy romantic one-on-one time together virtually with a ‘digital date’ as part of the package. If you prefer, you can celebrate your date night at a restaurant once lockdown is over.” Applicants can nominate themselves via the Beaverbooks website, explaining their lockdown love story in 100 words and attaching a picture of the couple. Entries close at 9am on February 5th 2021..

Oxford scientists prepare to edit vaccine to combat new variants

0

Scientists from the University of Oxford are preparing to produce new versions of the vaccine they developed with AstraZeneca in order to combat new variants of the coronavirus.

The emergence of variants of the SARS-Cov-2 virus, which causes COVID-19, has led to concerns about whether existing vaccines would be effective at producing herd immunity in the population. Initial laboratory tests indicate that the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine is effective against the B117 variant which emerged in Kent. However, there are concerns that variants which emerged in Brazil and South Africa may be resistant to the vaccines being rolled out worldwide.

Each time a virus infects a cell to produce copies of itself, there is a chance that errors occur in the copying process which produces the genetic material for new viruses. These errors are genetic mutations. According to Dr Amesh A. Adalja from Johns Hopkins University, a new variant is a “version of the virus that has accumulated enough mutations to represent a separate branch on the family tree”.

Most mutations have no effect. However, mutations which occur in the sections of genetic code which determine the structure of spike proteins on the virus’ surface can be hugely consequential. In order to combat a viral infection, specialised white blood cells called B-cells produce antibodies which are complimentary to the structure of the viral spike protein. These antibodies provide immunological memory, helping to fight future infection by this type of virus. If someone is then infected with a variant of that virus with altered spike proteins, their immunological memory will not recognise the new variant.

The Oxford, Moderna and Pfizer vaccines all work by introducing strands of viral mRNA into the cells of a person who receives an injection. That mRNA is then translated by the cell to produce SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins. The body’s immune system then produces antibodies which are complimentary to these spike proteins, which provide immunity against future infection.

Sir John Bell, Regius Professor of Medicine at Oxford, has expressed confidence that the Oxford vaccine can be quickly edited to provide immunity against new variants. This would involve editing the sequence of genetic material which make up the mRNA strands used in COVID vaccines.

The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) is in talks with the independent Commission on Human Medicines to determine how modified COVID-19 vaccines should be regulated. Sir Bell suggested that modified vaccines would only need to be tested on a small sample size to ensure that they were effective, instead of the thousands involved in the development of the first vaccine.

A spokesperson for MHRA told The Guardian: “We can say at this stage that it is unlikely that a full new approval process will be needed,” indicating that a modified vaccine could be approved for use quickly. However, they emphasised that “No vaccine will be authorised for supply in the UK unless the expected standards of safety, quality and effectiveness are met.”

Image: Steven Cornfield via unsplash.com

Covid-19 case numbers continue to drop in Oxfordshire

0

Oxfordshire has seen a decrease in new coronavirus cases in the week ending January 20th as compared to the previous week.  This is consistent with the county’s overall downwards trend in new cases following the stay-at-home order.

Case numbers per 100 000 people by local authority are as follows, with statistics from the week prior in brackets:

Oxford – 451.3 (down from 543.8)

Cherwell – 451.8 (down from 572.7)

Vale of White Horse – 259.5 (down from 297.0)

South Oxfordshire – 245.0 (down from 318.2)

West Oxfordshire – 185.3 (down from 306.4)

The national average is 420.2 (down from 523.4).

The total number of cases in Oxfordshire in the week ending January 20th was 2274 with a rolling rate of 328.8.  This constitutes a total decrease of 608 cases or -21.1% compared to the previous week.

The Oxfordshire case rate remains above the national average but the margin has decreased substantially since the last report.

Oxford SU respond to exam policy changes

0

Oxford SU have released a statement responding to the University’s new exams policy, announced last Friday. The SU has been running an ongoing campaign for students taking exams this academic year. 

The ‘Fair Outcomes for Students’ campaign is focused both on individual and cohort-level challenges. Some of the key policies advocated for by the campaign include rescaling cohort marks if cohort performance is lower than pre-pandemic years, reweighting examined components where appropriate, and an enhanced mitigating circumstances process. The SU are also advocating for mitigating circumstances procedures put in place this year to be extended to all students who have matriculated by MT20. 

The University’s new exams policies take up some of these suggestions, including a rescaling policy and new mitigating circumstances procedures. In the SU’s response, they highlighted some of these campaign wins, but also pushed for an expansion of the University’s current response to include more policy changes on a course-by-course basis.

The Sabbatical Officer team at the SU said: “We will continue to lobby for a more robust, transparent, and expanded mitigating circumstances process, including pushing for mitigating circumstances to affect outcome marks, not just classifications. Additionally, we welcome the University’s announcement of allowing for the inclusion of ‘explanatory statements’ for submissions affected by access to resources, which will be utilised during the marking phase.”

“We will lobby to ensure that this is implemented as broadly as possible, not just as a mitigation for coursework submissions, but also for exams. We believe exams are similarly affected by the ongoing difficulties of resource access for students.”

INEOS’ £100m donation to University criticised by climate groups

0

Climate activists are concerned about “greenwashing” as Oxford University accepts a £100m donation from petrochemicals company Ineos, in order to build a new research institute to fight antimicrobial resistance. 

The University published a statement on January 19th detailing its plans for the Ineos Oxford Institute for AMR research (IOI), which it states will research bacterial resistance and design new antimicrobial drugs. Its main aim is to tackle antimicrobial resistance, caused by overuse and misuse of antibiotics, which it states “is arguably the greatest economic and healthcare challenge facing the world post-Covid.”

However, there are concerns that in accepting the donation from INEOS, Oxford University is helping ‘clear’ the company’s name, as it is increasingly scrutinised in terms of its impact upon the climate. INEOS is one of the world’s largest manufacturers of chemicals and oil products, including the production of solvents, biofuels, plastics, synthetic oils and insulation materials. 

A statement from the Oxford Climate Justice Campaign (OCJC), seen by Cherwell, states: “Though the benefits of these research facilities cannot be denied, this is a clear example of greenwashing: INEOS is an environmentally damaging organisation, involved in drilling and petrochemical production, but thanks to this donation it can parade an ethical donation front.”

The statement continues: “Investing in wholly unrelated fields is not new to INEOS: the British-owned chemical giant owns the former Tour de France Group Sky and funded Eliud Chipchoge’s successful attempt to beat the 2 hour marathon. This donation is part of a strategy aimed at distracting from their appalling environmental and ethical record.” 

A spokesperson from Oxford University told Cherwell: “As with all donations to the University, INEOS has been approved by our rigorous due diligence procedures which consider ethical, legal, financial and reputational issues. All decisions about funding are made by the University’s Committee to Review Donations. These decisions are made in confidence and on their own merits and without consideration of, or reference to, any other University donors or any outside party.”

report published last year revealed that Ineos’ manufacturing plant in Grangemouth, Scotland was by far the nation’s largest polluter. Moreover, Ineos’ CEO Sir Jim Ratcliffe is a vocal critic of the UK government’s anti-fracking legislation. Earlier last year, he said: “The government’s position is unworkable and unhelpful… We have a non-existent energy strategy and are heading towards an energy crisis that will do long-term and irreparable damage to the economy and the government needs to decide whether they are finally going to put the country first and develop a workable UK onshore gas industry.”

A spokesperson from Ineos told Cherwell: “On the Grangemouth emission claim, the site is energy intensive and is, by far, Scotland’s largest manufacturing site.  It represents 4% of Scottish GDP so the claim that it has the highest emissions in Scotland is related entirely to the fact that it is Scotland’s largest manufacturing site.” The firm’s response also stated: “INEOS has no fracking activity. The company has licenses in the UK but has never progressed beyond the stage of geological survey and is unlikely to do so given the government moratorium on fracking.” 

This is not the first time that the University has come under scrutiny for accepting donations from controversial donors. These last two years have seen criticism regarding Oxford’s decision to accept a donation from Stephen Schwarzman, CEO and co-founder of Blackstone, an investment firm, to build a new humanities centre. 

An open letter penned by academics and students, published in 2019, stated: “The “Schwarzman Centre” will be built with the proceeds of the exploitation and disenfranchisement of vulnerable people across the world…Recent controversies surrounding donations by the Sackler Family and Jeffrey Epstein have shown how institutions that have ignored the concerns of their members have gone on, deservedly, to suffer significant damage to their reputations. We believe Oxford is leaving itself open to such future damage.”

OCJC’s statement included a reminder that “campaign groups such as Oxford Against Schwarzman and Disarm Oxford, as well as OCJC have long been calling for greater transparency from the University’s Committee to Review Donations and Research Funding.” It continued: “Safely severing financial ties with fossil fuel companies cannot happen overnight, but we believe that with due consultation, thought, effort and prioritisation it can and should happen in the very near future”. 

The University spokesperson told Cherwell: “We have very clear policies when accepting gifts that they should not influence academic freedom or content and this gift is no exception. The agenda for research will be determined by our academics at all times. INEOS will naturally very interested in the research and the changes it can bring about and we will be updating them regularly on progress.”

Image: Paul McIlroy / Petrochemical plant / CC BY-SA 2.0 via Wikimedia Commons

We hae meat and we can eat: Burns Night Banquet

0

Robert Burns: that guy who wrote ‘Auld Lang Syne’. That’s all he was to me before a half-Scot housemate suggested we throw our own Burns Night supper. Now, he’s captured a little piece of my heart – the bit reserved for food, booze, and hootenanny. 

Burns’ legacy has influenced some of literature’s greats, from Steinbeck’s Of Mice and Men to The Proclaimers’ ‘I’m Gonna Be (500 Miles)’. Last Monday, his legacy extended to ceasing the covid continuum in my flat. He inspired the creation of Scottish flags from IKEA bags, impassioned poetry recitals, and an authentic (FaceTimed) address from my flatmate’s kilt-adorned father. Often dubbed one of the greatest Scots in history, Burns’ work overflows with sincerity, Scottish culture, and food – oh, the food!

The centrepiece of any Burns supper is the haggis, the “Great chieftain o’ puddin’ race” Burns’ immortalised in 48 lines in the ‘Address to a Haggis’. By description alone, haggis is hardly something to get excited about – when you hear dinner’s going to be offal stuffed into a sheep’s stomach, your mouth doesn’t exactly start watering. But as soon as you dare take your first bite, the divisive delicacy wins you over. Rookies certainly won’t have experienced meat with texture like it before, but the flavours are familiar and welcoming. Sausage, pepper, and warm herbs greet you, and you find yourself immediately relaxing into it. 

Joining the Burns Night plate are staples that put a nervous haggis first-timer at ease. Neeps and tatties are the comforting starch of swede (trust me) and potatoes, and whisky sauce has a creamy, umami depth reminiscent of Diane sauce. These can be done with a twist and other sides are often added in: My Monday menu consisted of a nod to my household’s Swiss and Scottish heritage with Neeps and Tatties rösti, buttered lemony leeks, haggis, and whisky sauce. The röstis are crispy with hidden swede sweetness. Topped with haggis, whisky sauce, and buttered leeks, one mouthful feels decadent – a squeeze of lemon in the leeks to cut through the richness and you’re on your way to the perfect bite. 

Burns Night offers a rare spark of novelty in a time where days are monotonous at best. There is a bounty of tradition to immerse yourself in, and the more you commit the better the night gets. So pour yourself a wee dram and start practicing your poetry! 

Neeps & Tatties Rösti Recipe

Ingredients (Serves 6)

  • 500g Swede, peeled and grated 
  • 300g floury potatoes (about 5), peeled and grated 
  • 1 tsp thyme
  • 1 tsp salt (to taste)
  • Freshly ground black pepper 
  • Equal parts butter and vegetable oil, for frying 

Method 

  1. Preheat an oven to 180 C/350 F.
  2. In a large bowl mix the grated swede, potatoes, thyme, salt, and pepper together. Place in a cheese cloth (or tea towel) and squeeze out excess water (the drier the better). Tightly pack rösti mixture into balls roughy 4cm in diameter.*
  3. At a high heat, put equal parts butter and vegetable oil into a frying pan, adding enough to cover the entire bottom in a thin layer. Add a rösti ball to the pan and firmly flatten with a wide spatula. Allow to cook about 2 mins or until the bottom is golden-brown, then flip using a spatula (with confidence!). Repeat with all rösti balls. 
  4. Once both sides of the röstis are golden-brown, place on a baking tray and place in the oven for 15-20 minutes, or until cooked through. 

*If preparing ahead of time, fry the röstis and wait until ready to serve to put in the oven. This prevents the starch in the potatoes oxidising and turning them an unappetising grey colour.

Photo by Katie Hollands.

Clamorous Noise: The Music of Everyday Life

Born in 2005, Alma Deutscher has been composing since the age of four: she is that rare breed known as a child prodigy, touted to mystified television audiences quietly envious that they could never hope to be a prodigy, let alone a few years after having learnt to walk. Few things would see adults jealous of a child, though it is easy to see how Deutscher’s innate musical excellence might be an exception. Born to Cambridge graduates Janie and Guy, a literature professor and linguist, Deutscher’s intellect was nurtured from within the family home, after attending a school orientation day and resigning herself to forever resist the apparent boredom of an ordinary education—she has been home-schooled since. Having learnt the piano aged two and violin the year after, she can thank her musical talent for having saved her from show-and-tell. 

Living in Oxford when she was young, some of Deutscher’s earliest musical memories were formed in the city. She would play in her garden with a skipping rope, twirling it around and allowing the melodies to flow forth, before writing them down in her notebook—later providing useful material for her first studio album, titled—straightforwardly—From My Book of Melodies. ‘When you’re a young child, everything is a game. And music was a game for me—a wonderful game. As I grow up, it becomes more serious.’ Countless interviewers have asked Deutscher self-same questions, endeared curiously at the talented little girl… I wonder if all the adult awe became a little dull. Or patronising. But Deutscher is truly remarkable: aged five, she completed her first piano sonata; at seven, she wrote her first short opera; at nine she wrote a concerto for violin and orchestra, and a full-length opera at twelve. Winner of the European Culture Prize (2019), Deutscher is certain to join the musical greats of the coming decades, perhaps familiar of a young Daniel Barenboim (the child prodigy pianist and conductor born in 1942). 

I’m curious whether this Basingstoke-born Mozart incarnate wanted to shake the patronage and assert herself as a consequential composer, her age irrelevant to the quality of her music. Has Deutscher’s widening perception of humanity affected the tone and meaning of her compositions? She says it’s too soon to say. ‘Maybe if you ask me in ten years’ time, I’ll have a better answer.’ One must remember she is still just a teenager—she’ll turn sixteen in February. Though listen to her music and your ears might tell you otherwise.

If anything asserts Deutscher’s transition from child to professional composer, it is her Siren Waltz, performed to a sold-out Carnegie Hall in 2019. Deutscher endeavoured to deconstruct the clamorous noises of everyday life, she based the waltz on the sound of the Austrian police sirens she was so struck by when first moving to Vienna; they begin the piece, before orchestrally-recreated car horns and sirens disintegrate and a melody emerges. ‘Most sounds of everyday life are not particularly pleasant or beautiful,’ she says; ‘so it’s certainly not easy to find beauty in them. But it’s worth trying because it’s worth trying to find beauty in everything.’ A mantra perhaps appropriate amidst the sustained devastation of the pandemic into the New Year, I wonder if we all ought to practise Deutscher’s skill of searching-out beauty in ordinariness—though perhaps this might feel a little lacklustre with her orchestral version playing in mind.  

Influenced by the newfound stimulation of the city to which she’d recently moved, Deutscher took the ‘police sirens, the beeping of the closing underground doors, car horns’—sounds wearily metropolitan to the rest of us—and ‘tried to transform them into uplifting melodies,’ trying to ‘compose it in a way that the listeners could follow the gradual transformation from ugly into beautiful.’ Deutscher considers that the effects of music are ‘probably much stronger than painting’, and its power to evoke profound emotion is perhaps what explains why so many have turned to music to drown the noise of the past year’s news headlines. 

But Deutscher says she is sometimes criticised for the lack of ugliness in her music—as though to seek charm in an often unpleasant world is a naïve romanticisation of modern existence—or for reproducing the chirping tunefulness familiar to the musical canon of past centuries. Her musical aesthetics certainly forefront the importance of melody established in musical history, but she insists that ‘melody is the essence of [all] music – this is not just my own musical aesthetics, it’s the aesthetics of almost everyone, young and old. It’s not a great secret that the most loved pieces of music are the ones with the best tunes.’ Indeed, Deutscher cites her second opera, Cinderella, as containing numerous examples of willingly ‘unpleasant’ passages: ‘they are there to make a specific point—for example to convey a storm of anger and pain […] these short bits of ugliness are only there to highlight the beauty of that comes afterwards.’

I am increasingly compelled by Deutscher’s argument that, if the world is already a tumultuous place (of this fact there is little doubt), then why saturate it with even more tunelessness? ‘I don’t see the point of creating ugliness just for the sake of it,’ she concludes resolutely, ‘It’s the easiest thing in the world to create ugly music. You don’t need inspiration, you don’t need talent, you don’t need hard work […] Why should I torture myself and my audience with more of it?’

I ask Deutscher to list her ‘top three’ composers. Apparently, her younger sister always lists a ‘top three’ of everything. My question now feels somewhat juvenile. ‘There are just too many composers that I like in different ways and at different times. When I listen to music, I try to analyse and learn from the aspects that I like, rather than just rank it as number one or number two-and-a-half.’ In the last year, Desutcher has apparently been studying Richard Strauss (try his Vier Letzte Lieder), whose work she found a particular inspiration when revising and re-orchestrating Cinderella. Speaking of her sister, I feel a sudden sympathy for the younger sibling of someone like Deutscher—parental expectations can be weighty at the best of times. But then, I consider whether she might often feel the pressure of the reputation which preceded her in adolescence. Yet it seems that her musical interest is borne of genuine passion—her parents aren’t the pushy showboat sort, but limit her media appearances and performances so as to encourage opportunities that she finds most enjoyable or conducive. ‘I’m very lucky that, so far, almost all the pieces that I composed were pieces that I really wanted to do. So I don’t think I ever really got stuck in the sense of thinking to myself: I hate this piece, why do I have to do it?

Deutscher’s 2019 debut at Carnegie Hall received a standing ovation—a compliment considering the tough New York crowds—and was commended by critics. ‘With big projects,’ she admits, ‘usually the challenge is that there is too little time to finish them.’ But the positive reaction of the public emboldens her to boldly experiment with lengthier pieces, which ‘would be difficult to keep up the motivation for’ if reception was not as balmy. Then again, she says that she is ‘sometimes told by people in the classical music establishment that the style of my music is wrong and heretical’—but doesn’t seem dispirited. Indeed, her career is only truly beginning. 

A child prodigy though she is, lockdown has affected Deutscher just as it has everyone else. Just instead of cancelling concerts she’d planned to attend, the pandemic cancelled concerts she herself had organised. A new production of my opera Cinderella was supposed to open in Salzburg in December after I had spent months on months last year revising it. We even started rehearsing for it in November.’ She remains fairly positive despite the impact on her work, ambitiously hoping for its opening in January. ‘Compared to most musicians, I’m extremely lucky, because as a composer, I’m not wasting my time. I’ve been working on my next opera, Des Kaisers Neuer Walzer (The Emperor’s New Waltz). It’s a romantic comedy about a rich girl falling in love with a poor boy, combined with musical satire inspired by Andersen’s fairy tale.’ This being her third opera, it has already been commissioned by the Salzburg State Theatre for performance in 2022. ‘If Coronavirus had not left so much quiet time,’ she says, ‘I would never have managed to get anywhere near finishing in the short time I still have.’

I wonder if there’s any adolescent typicality underneath the songbooks and melodies and operatic daydreams… ‘when I’m grumpy I rarely get inspiration’, she admits. But the attention and diligence required of serious composing demands a certain sophisticated devotion: ‘putting ideas together, developing them into a larger structure and telling a coherent story with the music’ is more about technique and experience ‘than just about mood’. Does Deutscher listen to pop music? Can classical and popular genres coexist? Apparently so: ‘At least melodic pop music speaks a similar language to classical music in terms of harmony and melody. Just to pluck a completely random example from the air, Irving Berlin’s song Let’s Face the Music and Dance is a stunning melody, based on the chords of the lament bass. And I’m sure any of the great classical masters would have been extremely proud if they had come up with this tune.’ When a friend—who is not a fan of classical—started humming a song by the singer Dimash Kudaibergen, Deutscher identified it as being from Mozart’s opera, The Magic Flute. You’ll likely recognise its famous Der Hölle Rache—the aria sung by the Queen of the Night. ‘So Mozart passes the test of being a good pop composer.’ I’m sure he’d be relieved to hear it.

Being so young, I wonder what success Deutscher will see in the next decade, by the end of which she will not yet even be in her thirties—and this lockdown still won’t have ended. Though if sustained confinement were to be a reality, I daresay musical history would be grateful for the countless operas, sonatas and concertos composed in the quiet it allows her—and if she retains that integrity of musical beauty, things may yet remain a little cheerful. 

Image Credit: Alma Deutscher

Shoulda put a ring on it: rings as a form of self-expression

0

Rings: the often simple form of circular jewellery typically worn on one’s fingers, have a long history. Examples of rings have been found dating back to before 2000BC, and over their 4000 year history they have found their place as a versatile accessory, suitable for anyone and any occasion. 

Yet to this day, there exists a lengthy list of regulations surrounding rings. From traditions on the proper jewellery to wear, to rules on how you should wear them, and most importantly, specifics on how they should be styled. Some rules are more general, applying to jewellery as a whole, whilst others apply specifically to the world of rings. The most prevalent example are the traditions surrounding wedding rings and bands. In the UK, the wedding ring is traditionally worn on the ring finger of the left hand. Engagement rings have been historically reserved for women, and after the wedding the engagement ring is worn together with the wedding ring on the same finger. Diamond rings were also seen as only for women.  

However, in recent years rings have for many people become the ultimate form of self-expression despite these rules and traditions. Wedding rings and engagement rings are becoming less popular among the younger generations as their ideas about marriage and relationships change. For those that opt for them, they often avoid the flashier options. The now wide-spread knowledge of the use of conflict minerals in high-end jewellery, particularly diamonds, alongside the economic realities faced by young couples have led to more understated choices. A higher proportion of men are wearing engagement rings and at the same time, more and more couples are opting to ditch engagement rings all together, particularly given the problematic gender dynamic involved with them. 

These changes are not limited to wedding rings. With the release of La Manso’s most recent collection of rings, there is a focus on plastic rings in bright colours. This demonstrates a distinct change from traditional rings utilising metal, and the association that rings, and jewellery in general, should only be stylised as ‘luxury’. These rings provide a unique fashion statement, a clear marker of one’s own style. They also represent a move away from more problematic usages of fast fashion to buy cheaper metal jewellery, as well as from conflict minerals in more expensive pieces. Changes in gender norms have also changed the ring market, with men increasingly using rings as a form of self expression outside of the traditional wedding band or signet ring. As seen in many celebrity looks, men have adopted rings in a wide-array of styles, some opting for more minimalist looks, whilst others stack rings or choose to flex heavily jewelled pieces. 

Stacking rings, whilst not a new idea, having been popular across Europe for both men and women in the Middle-Ages, marks the pinnacle of rule-breaking self-expression when it comes to jewellery. As such, it is an extremely popular look at the moment and is surprisingly easy to pull off. The choices made when stacking rings say a lot about the wearer, whether deliberate or not. Stacking rings allows for simpler pieces to be elevated and older pieces to be reused; one is able to mix metals, different coloured jewels, and combine high and low-end pieces to form their own unique look – expressing all the wearer wants to say with just their hands.

The choices made by all genders in creating such looks are able to function as a form of self-expression never seen before. Beneath the beauty of the rings themselves, you are able to read deeply into the wearer’s personality and sense of style as you understand how they choose to break the rules and depart from traditions.