Sunday 27th July 2025
Blog Page 377

Colleges face flooding

0

Several colleges face flooding as part of the ongoing weather affecting Oxfordshire this month. Lady Margaret Hall and Magdalen grounds were particularly affected, with pictures of flooded outdoor grounds shared across Twitter and Instagram by students. “We have experienced it before,” says LMH’s men’s welfare officer, Spike Hagan. “Being on the river, LMH is prone to flooding,” says Hagan, who saw the flooding begin on the 25th going into the 26th of January. Hagan says the issue has never been addressed by LMH’s administrative team, but “it hasn’t really affected me, except for being able to visit an LMH institution – the Shack,” where students hang out at night to play scrabble or have a drink.

The water meadow in Magdalen college has also flooded, “but that is basically designed to flood and does very frequently to no one’s detriment” says third year student Lizzie Craig. Flooding hasn’t affected mobility much as “the paths are mostly okay because they’re raised,” says Craig. The picture above shows the flooding at Magdalen College.

There are currently zero severe flood warnings and four flood alerts across Oxfordshire county. Current alerts are River Cherwell from Lower Heyford down to and including Oxford, River Thame and Chalgrove Brook, River Thames and tributaries from Buscot Wick down to Kings Lock, and River Thames and tributaries in the Oxford area. See flood-warning-information.service.gov.uk for more details.

Image Credit: Ellie Redpath

JCRs and societies respond to SU President-Elect controversy

0

CW: racism, transphobia, antisemitism.

Numerous college JCRs have voted to support a Motion of No Confidence in the Student Union (SU) President-Elect Rashmi Samant following a series of social media posts which have sparked controversy while student-led groups, including the SU LGBTQ+ Campaign and the Oxford International Society, have called on her to resign and apologise.

Cherwell has seen motions approved by Hertford, Magdalen Colleges’ JCRs, and Wadham College’s SU to support a Motion of No Confidence at an SU Council Meeting. 70% of those present at Magdalen’s general meeting voted for the College to use their three representative votes to back the motion. Oriel College will debate whether to support a Motion of No Confidence on February 15th.

Section 28.4 of the SU Bye-Laws says that a Motion of No Confidence requires two thirds of the Student Council to vote in favour during two consecutive Meetings of Council. A referendum of SU members will then be called, where a No Confidence motion can be passed by a simple majority.

The motions have been prompted by a series of controversial posts made by Samant on Instagram, which emerged after she was elected to the Presidency with 53% of the vote share. Samant’s manifesto emphasised her commitment to “tackle institutional homophobia and transphobia”, and to decolonise the curriculum.

Samant faced controversy for an Instagram post from December 2019, taken in Malaysia, which was captioned “Ching Chang”. The motion presented at the Hertford JCR described this as a “sinophobic hallmark”. When questioned on the appropriateness of the caption, Samant explained that it was a reference to a joke a South East Asian friend had made about her vegetarianism: “Apparently in Mandarin the phrase literally translates to “eat that plant”… that was the “joke” apparently and the group played on my need to have the perfect rhyming captions to sell it to me. I should have known better”. This translation has been called into question by Mandarin speakers on social media, who noted the word “ching” cannot be spelled in pinyin, the system which romanises Mandarin characters.

In a statement to Cherwell, the Oxford University Chinese Society said: “We condemn any act of racism in any form at any time. Racism is completely inconsistent with the values of the Oxford University Chinese Society. We urge Rashmi to stop making excuses and formally apologise for her insensitivity. She should face the consequences of her actions, and we will not accept a SU president who discriminates against any group of people”.

Samant has also been criticised for an Instagram post captioned with the phrase “women, transwomen [sic] and men”, which has been as criticised for being transphobic for “inappropriately distinguishing” between cis women and trans women. In a statement on Facebook, the SU LGBTQ+ Campaign said they were “alarmed by the recent revelations about the Oxford SU President-Elect. Although we understand that her remarks on the trans community may have come from a place of ignorance, we find her repeated insensitivity to race and her unwillingness to apologise when called out for this far more concerning. The LGBTQ+ Campaign stands in complete solidarity with CRAE, and with all students of colour on this issue, and affirms the need for her to step down and make an immediate, formal apology.”

An Instagram post from June 5th 2017 seen by Cherwell shows Samant at the Memorial to the Murdered Jews of Europe in Berlin, and was captioned with a pun on the word ‘Holocaust’: “The memorial *CASTS* a *HOLLOW* dream of the past atrocities and deeds. Reflecting on it gives us the power to live with the past vouching for a better future. #holocaustMemorial #uniqueArchitecture”. When questioned on Instagram, Samant said she “wouldn’t even dare to be insensitive about something like that” and that while she believed it was “upto [sic] the interpreter”, her caption was not insensitive. Samant told the student she “completely condemn[s] the Holocaust”. When approached by Cherwell, Samant apologised for “the insensitivity this language shows” and noted “I have since had personal experiences, conversations, and learning opportunities that have allowed me to see how this language is not appropriate, and I fully accept my error in not appropriately researching topics before posting about them. In the almost five years since this post, I have changed as a person, scholar, and activist; I am sure many other people have experienced drastic change in themselves and their personal lives in a five-year period. I reaffirm my commitment outlined in my campaign manifesto to continually learning, changing, and bettering myself to serve in this position as well as possible.”

In a hustings event hosted by the Oxford Blue, Samant also compared Cecil Rhodes to Hitler, asking “if an organisation would come up to you and give you a heap of money to set up a scholarship and say ‘I want to name this the Hitler fund or the Hitler scholarship’, would you do it?”. When questioned further, Samant elaborated on her point, saying that “nobody erected him [Hitler] statues or wrote wonderful things about him or established anything about him, that’s why we still remember him for what he did, but by doing things like that we stopped remembering people for what they did and we start developing this psychology that maybe what they did was not so bad”.

Responding to these events, the President and Vice-President of the Oxford University Jewish Society told Cherwell they were “extremely concerned by SU President-Elect Rashmi Samant’s past social media posts, which she has alarmingly failed to apologise for. Her caption of a photo at the Berlin Holocaust Memorial exhibited severe insensitivity and ignorance, as did her ill-thought-out parallel between Cecil Rhodes and Adolf Hitler. Furthermore, we stand in full solidarity with the trans community and East and South East Asians, who have been hurt and distressed by other offensive comments made by Samant.”

The SU Campaign for Racial Awareness and Equality issued a lengthy statement on Facebook making a “firm recommendation that the President-Elect should stand down from her position”. They continued that “the repetitive and sustained nature of Ms. Samant’s actions suggest considerable ignorance at best, but active discrimination at worst… the President-Elect has demonstrated unwillingness to take accountability for her actions, which we believe to be a crucial aspect of self-education and making amends…. [and] although CRAE believes that individuals can make mistakes, learn, and move on, Ms. Samant is not currently fit to represent the student body of this university. Our community is diverse but various groups continue to be marginalised and we do not believe that she can represent them effectively.” Elaborating further, they stated: “although we cannot assume the intentions of Ms. Samant, we believe that it is ultimately the impact of her actions that are important here: she has hurt the East-Asian, Jewish, and trans communities. Not only did she post racially insensitive captions on social media, but she has also proceeded to deny the harm caused by her actions when questioned.” They further noted that “the President-Elect made a distinction between trans women and women, thereby implying that trans women are not women and perpetuating trans-exclusionary ideology. CRAE stands in solidarity with the Oxford LGBTQ+ community and unequivocally condemns this… She has disappointed all those who put faith in her with their votes.” The statement concluded: “If Ms. Samant truly intends to grow, self-educate, and better herself, she must show remorse and recognise that she is not currently capable of representing the groups to whom she has caused offence. As such, we expect her immediate letter of resignation and a formal apology to the East-Asian, Jewish, and trans communities.”

Oxford International Society also posted a statement on Facebook, writing that: “For a candidate who campaigned for inclusivity, it is crushing to understand this was insincere in nature. Her Anti-Semitic, transphobic and racist social media posts were horrific, and the refusal to take accountability for hurting students highlights that she should not take up the SU Presidency… If she really cares for the student population, she would recognise that her actions are unacceptable and will resign immediately. We urge the President-Elect to resign and apologise.”

Rashmi Samant and the Student Union have been approached for comment.

Image: Matthew Waring via unsplash.com

JCRs respond to St Peter’s College event with Ken Loach

0

CW: Antisemitism.

JCRs across the University have released motions and statements condemning the invitation of speaker Ken Loach to St. Peter’s College, and the UJS (Union of Jewish Students) are offering free antisemitism training to all JCRs and MCRs through Oxford JSoc. This follows initial statements from Oxford Jsoc and St Peter’s College JCR, amongst others. 

St. Hugh’s College JCR has released a statement condemning the invitation of Ken Loach, also stating that they believe “the regrettable response of St. Peter’s college has encouraged the pile-on of antisemetic abuse on the Oxford Jewish Society’s (JSoc) social media pages, with students having to read and moderate these comments.” The motion for this statement was passed on Tuesday, with 66 votes in favour and 6 against. 

Hertford College have also released a statement, condemning the event alongside stating a commitment “to improving our understanding of anti-Semitism and Jewish identity and working to provide adequate welfare resources and support for Jewish students affected by anti-Semitism.” Mansfield College has released a statement including a list of welfare resources for Jewish students at the college. 

Wadham College SU have also passed a motion condemning the invitation of Ken Loach and expressing solidarity with Jewish students, which passed on Wednesday with 150 votes for, 14 against, and 4 abstinations. Keble college has passed a similar motion, which further condemns the Master’s response: “By downplaying the severity of Loach’s comments, and putting the burden of labour on the students, the Master handled the issue insensitively and ignorantly.”

St John’s College held a meeting on Thursday evening to discuss their motion, which includes a mandate for the “JCR Equality and Diversity Officer to arrange Antisemitism Awareness Training for JCR members, provided by the Union of Jewish Students,” and they have since released a statement condemning the invitation of Loach. Members of Christ Church’s JCR committee have sent a letter to students expressing solidarity with the Jewish community and stating that they “have been in contact with the Union of Jewish Students about their antisemitism awareness workshop and would like to invite and encourage the rest of the JCR to join us in attending this session to increase our awareness of the history and evolution of antisemitism.” 

LMH held a meeting on Thursday evening, which included two motions: one condemning St. Peter’s College and one mandating their JCR president to sign the PresCom letter in support of Jewish students. Both motions at LMH passed with an overwhelming majority.

Image Credit: Andrew Shiva / Wikipedia / CC BY-SA 4.0.

Growing Pains: The Development of YA

0

May the odds be ever in your favour. Maybe okay will be our always. If people were rain, I was drizzle and she was a hurricane. 

If you recognised where more than one of those quotes came from, chances are you also spent 2012-2014 engrossed in books by the likes of John Green, Rainbow Rowell and Veronica Roth. Although it really does feel like another era, it’s easy to conjure up memories of a time when the internet was filled with photos of Shailene Woodley in yet another book-to-film adaptation and rumours about what the next John Green book would be about. The YA fiction boom really was its own mini cultural era. Gone are the days of passing a tattered copy of The Fault in Our Stars around your entire friendship group, but how does YA lit hold up today? And how did that cultural era affect the ‘young adults’ at its centre?

As a former die-hard Hunger Games fan (yes, I own the pin), the release of the prequel, ‘A Ballad of Songbirds and Snakes’ convinced me to delve back into the world of YA. I was somewhat surprised to find I really enjoyed the book – sure, not quite as much as my obsessive past-self might have done, but nonetheless, I found it miles more entertaining than most of the ‘adult’ fiction I’d been trying to force myself to love. Intrigued, I picked up some more of my past favourites, eager to see whether they would stand the test of time.

What I found was that I enjoyed these books miles more than the more ‘literary’ novels I had been trying to convince myself to like. This left me thinking – why do I enjoy YA so much? Other than the age of its characters, what differentiates it from other genres?  In my opinion, it boils down to this: YA fiction is written for two key purposes. To entertain, and, in the least pretentious terms possible, to soften the pain of growing up. This applies to both of the main YA sub-genres: Contemporary (think The Fault in Our Stars, If I Stay, Simon vs the Homosapiens’ Agenda), and Dystopia (think The Hunger Games, Divergent, The Maze Runner). In both cases, seeing 16-year-olds facing seemingly insurmountable challenges makes normal life seem less awful, whether those challenges are car crashes, illnesses, or toppling a fascist regime. YA author Holly Bourne also explained the popularity of the genre by saying it ‘treated its target audience with a respect they hadn’t previously been afforded’ – YA authors don’t shy away from the political or the gritty, with The Hunger Games being an obvious example. They present the difficulties of life as they are, without simplifying things or taking on a condescending tone. At the same time, there is also something to be said for the fun of YA fic – not concerned with being ‘literary’, it embraces wit, drama, and, of course, the good old-fashioned love triangle. 

It’s safe to say that there are some YA books that stand the test of time. I’d encourage anyone to re-read dystopian classics like The Hunger Games – I’d hazard a guess that they’ve taken on a chilling new resonance in light of events like the pandemic (Maze Runner, anyone?) and America’s recent coup. But not every story holds up quite as well. As evidenced by the quotes at the start of this article, the melodramatic style of some YA authors can feel exhaustingly cliché, as an older reader, and some YA prose definitely feels like its main purpose is to be quotable. In addition to this, books like Rainbow Rowell’s Eleanor and Park have faced backlash for their treatment of race and culture; the eponymous Park of Rowell’s novel is Korean, and last year a viral tweet called attention to the ways in which the book perpetuates Asian stereotypes. Similarly, there have been numerous think-pieces about the ethics of the ‘sick lit’ sub-genre, stories like The Fault in Our Stars that deal with terminal illness and, some argue, fetishise it. Certain authors like YA ‘final boss’ John Green have also come under fire for sexism in their writing, especially in terms of embracing the ‘manic pixie dream girl’ trope. For example, in Paper Towns the character of Margot becomes more of an idea than a person – while this is definitely conscious, and a lesson the book teaches, when taken in context with the rest of Green’s novels, a pattern certainly emerges with his female characters. Following the manic pixie dream girl definition, their main function in his stories is to provide growth for the main character: Green’s heroines are unattainable, swooping into the boys’ lives and leading them on to some revelation about themselves and their lives before promptly all but disappearing in a cloud of smoke. 

On the flip side, diversity is perhaps one of the most positive lasting consequences of the YA boom. As a genre, it has always been ahead of the curve in terms of representation. For example, Becky Abertalli’s Simon vs the Homosapiens Agenda and its film adaptation broke into the mainstream, making a story centering a gay teenager something people of a variety of ages and sexualities wanted to go to the cinema and see – even if it came under fire for being ‘a gay story for a straight audience’, it’s hard to deny that it had much more of a positive impact than a negative one. Other, perhaps less sanitised, LGBT YA classics include Aristotle & Dante Discover the Secrets of the Universe by Benjamin Alire Sanchez, a story about a Mexican-American boy discovering his feelings for his best friend, and The Miseducation of Cameron Post, a historical fiction book about a lesbian teenager in the 90s being sent to a conversion therapy camp. It’s important to note, however, that this diversity came almost exclusively in the contemporary side of the YA genre: dystopian novels were often far more white and straight, with some of those that did feature LGBT representation falling into the ‘bury your gays’ trope. Additionally, a feature of the contemporary YA genre is that often characters become their marginalised identity: stories become ‘what it’s like to be an [insert identity here]’ rather than that identity simply being an aspect of the person.

At the end of the day, however, YA’s literary reign in 2012-14 was in many ways ahead of its time – at least as far as diversity and representation are concerned. In fact, I would go as far as to say it may be a reason why so many people in our generation are more interested and aware of LGBT identities, cultural differences, and mental health issues; it’s interesting to think about how the sudden popularity of the genre has consequences that stretch on to today. The YA boom also birthed a particular brand of fan culture, or ‘fandom’ that lives on today, even if it has migrated from Tumblr to Twitter and TikTok. At the same time, it was very much an era with a beginning and an end. For example, due to the way the film industry works, many of these books had to wait until 2018 or later for their films to be released, leaving them to flop as their army of fans had moved on. Think about how the Divergent trilogy films gradually faded into oblivion – in fact, the final instalment is yet to be released and likely never will be, in part due to the poor box office and critical performance of the previous film.

With that said, YA does live on here in the 2020s. Book publications are becoming more and more diverse, with recent stories including Full Disclosure by Camryn Garrett, a novel about a Black HIV-positive girl struggling to tell her love interest about her status. There are also, increasingly, adult or ‘New Adult’ (NA) books that bridge the gap and make fiction fun. A great example of this is Casey McQuiston’s Red, White, and Royal Blue, an NA rom-com about the Prince of England falling in love with the biracial, bisexual first-son of the US. In terms of adaptation, Netflix has learnt the tricks of the trade and taken over: the TV adaptation of ‘13 Reasons Why’ was, while hugely controversial, very popular, and franchises like To All the Boys continue to thrive. Thanks to their predecessors, Netflix’s adaptations find an audience outside of the original bookish crowd – one consequence of the YA boom is that films that technically would be considered within the genre now do well with far, far wider audiences. 

When it comes down to it, it’s safe to say the full cultural era of 2012-14 won’t be coming back any time soon; we’re unlikely to see many more pre-teens donning mockingjay pins or taking selfies in t-shirts with John Green quotes on them. But, for better or worse, the impact of YA fiction remains embedded in the adolescent experience of our generation – not only did it encourage us to be more socially and politically aware of the world around us, but it gave us a whole host of other skills too. For example, it led many tweens to become more tech savvy, via platforms for fans like Tumblr, and got many people into creative writing via fanfiction. In fact, it could be argued the impact of fanfiction on literature in general massively increased with the rise of YA – as well as YA novels themselves, like Fangirl by Rainbow Rowell, the 50 Shades franchise famously originated from Twilight fanfiction. YA books are clearly not just relics of their time, but stories that continue to be relevant – and not only to young people. Sure, they aren’t Great Novels, but they’re not trying to be. They never were. They occupy their own niche which continues to grow and transform with the times and, frankly,  literature needs them. 

“Here Comes Your” Alt-Rock

0

Jimmy Brewer looks back at five bands who defined the sound of alt-rock. Listen to the accompanying Spotify mix @cherwellmusic.

Alternative Rock, or Alt-Rock for short, emerged from the late 70s’ independent music scene and its DIY punk ethos. It is characterised by experimentation with texture, timbre, and structure, especially drawing on the raw, distorted punk rock sounds and new wave’s energetic appeal. The genre saw its commercial peak in the 90s, spearheaded by Nirvana and Jane’s Addiction. Here are five artists who advanced alt-rock’s sound before its 90s boom. 

The Velvet Underground

Despite not fitting in chronologically with the emergence of alternative rock as a movement, stylistically, a lot began with The Velvet Underground. Holed away in Andy Warhol’s New York creative hub, ‘The Factory’, in the late 60s, the band released some of the most exciting rock music ever. Take their distorted, lewd and all-around-nasty second LP, White Light/White Heat: comprising just six songs, this is The Velvets at their harshest and noisiest. Or, listen to the latter half of “I Heard Her Call My Name”, with its pounding drums and ear-splitting guitar tone: it is at once unhinged and brilliant. This album distinctively laid the foundations for Alt-Rock’s louder and more extreme sounds.

The Fall

We jump forward over a decade to Manchester’s more left-field, post-punk flavour. Essentially a revolving cast centred around frontman/mastermind Mark E. Smith, the band were known for their repetitive, enraged and cryptic cuts. Try “Spoilt Victorian Child” from their 1985 album This Nation’s Saving Grace: exhilarating and exhausting, a jangly, infectious guitar lead counterbalances Mark E. Smith’s typically outré lyricism.

The band were favourites of legendary disc-jockey John Peel, featuring often on his radio programme. Whilst still firmly within the realm of cult popularity, The Fall made a distinctive mark on alternative music – in particular on Sonic Youth, who recorded three Fall covers for a John Peel session. 

Pixies

Formed in 1986 in Boston, one thing Pixies do incredibly well is to work pop-caliber hooks into their noisy, chaotic sound. This stands out in songs like “Debaser” and “Here Comes My Man”, both from 1989’s Doolittle. They perfected this formula so convincingly that they essentially wrote the rulebook for much of the 90s Alt-Rock craze.  Listen to “Tame” from Doolittle; the quiet-verse explosive-chorus structure prefigures Nirvana’s “Smells Like Teen Spirit”. In fact, Kurt Cobain admitted that he was “basically trying to rip off the Pixies”. Artist after artist cites Pixies as a major influence; they “changed [the] life” of Radiohead’s Thom Yorke; for David Bowie, they were “just about the most compelling music of the 80s”.

Sonic Youth

Bowie’s “just about” is significant; there was another equally compelling group, these New York alternative rock titans. Formed in 1981, Sonic Youth initially dabbled in the scuzzy, nihilistic world of No Wave, before really hitting their stride with their third LP release EVOL  (1986). “Tom Violence” wails with tortured guitars, whilst in “Shadow of a Doubt” carefully plucked harmonics tiptoe around hushed vocals before the second half of the song roars to life. Restrained songwriting makes each track feel like it has got somewhere to go, reeling you in before hitting you with an impactful wall of noise. The band continued to put out music of quality until their disbandment in 2013, so have a discography really worth exploring.

Hüsker Dü

As guitarist Bob Mould said, “Hüsker Dü wears many wigs.” They began as a breakneck hardcore punk act (heard in their 1983 debut, Everything Falls Apart), but had incorporated significant melodic aspects into their sound by the time they released 1984’s Zen Arcade. To a somewhat bleak coming-of-age narrative are set crackling guitars and muscular, percussion; lo-fi production gives the songs a gritty edge, yet moments of melody still shine through, such as the pulsating bassline and anthemic harmonies of “Something I Learned Today”. Ending memorably, the album gives its final track to the 14-minute, multi-phased “Reoccurring Dreams”. Whilst always remaining just south of true mainstream success, never compromised their at times strange, but always exciting, sound.  

Image credit: Verve Records via Wikimedia & Creative Commons.

Oxford vaccine offers “minimal protection” against South African variant but prevents serious illness

0

In a study led by researchers from the South African University of Witwatersrand and the University of Oxford, the Oxford AstraZeneca vaccine has been found to have “minimal protection” against mild to moderate cases of the South African Covid-19 variant.

 The vaccine’s efficacy against moderate-severe infection, hospitalisation or death could not be determined due to the study’s young demographic, with the average age of the some 2,000 participants being 31. The results were published by Oxford this week prior to the study’s scientific peer-review. 

As a result of the news South Africa have halted the rollout of the Oxford vaccine. The country were delivered 1m doses at the end of January – the first vaccines they had received, and had hoped to begin their immunisation programme shortly afterward.

However, Professor Shabir Madhi, who spearheaded the study, was optimistic about the Oxford vaccine’s ability to prevent severe cases of the South African variant. He noted that a similar vaccine, produced by Johnson & Johnson, reduced severe infection by 89%. Professor Madhi is Director of the Vaccines & Infectious Diseases Analytics research unit at Witwatersrand.

The Oxford AstraZeneca vaccine was announced by the University in December to have an efficacy of 90% against the original coronavirus variant after a full then half dose. Subsequently, research by the Oxford AstraZeneca team concluded that it remained effective against the Kent variant, the dominant variant in the UK.

Sarah Gilbert, Professor of Vaccinology at Oxford, has said that new variants are being tackled by vaccine modifications, commenting that “efforts are underway to develop a new generation of vaccines that will allow protection to be redirected to emerging variants as booster jabs, if it turns out it is necessary to do so.” As of February 8th, there were 147 cases of the South African variant in the UK. The UK imposed a travel ban on South Africa in December, adding 9 other southern African countries to it this week.

Oxford vaccine provides sustained protection during 3-month interval until second dose

0

The Oxford coronavirus vaccine is more effective at longer prime-boost intervals, with a single dose having an efficacy rate of 76% from 22- up to 90-days post vaccination, researchers at the University of Oxford have found.

Additionally, the Oxford vaccine may be effective in reducing transmission of coronavirus. Based on swabs obtained from volunteers in the UK, there was a 67% reduction in positive tests among those who had been vaccinated.

Professor Andrew Pollard, Chief Investigator of the Oxford Vaccine Trial, and co-author, said in a press release: “These new data provide an important verification of the interim data that was used by more than 25 regulators including the MHRA and EMA to grant the vaccine emergency use authorisation.

“It also supports the policy recommendation made by the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) for a 12-week prime-boost interval, as they look for the optimal approach to roll out, and reassures us that people are protected from 22 days after a single dose of the vaccine.”

Based on these findings, the dosing interval, rather than the dosing level, has a greater impact on vaccine efficacy. Previous research on other vaccines such as influenza, Ebola, and malaria have also shown increased efficacy with longer prime-boost intervals.

At the same time, Oxford University is leading the first trial to investigate dosing with alternative vaccines for the initial ‘prime’ vaccination to the follow-up ‘booster’ vaccination. The study is conducted by the National Immunisation Schedule Evaluation Consortium (NISEC), and is backed by £7 million of government funding from the Vaccines Taskforce. 

Matthew Snape, Associate Professor in Paediatrics and Vaccinology at the University of Oxford, and Chief Investigator on the trial said in a press release, “If we do show that these vaccines can be used interchangeably in the same schedule this will greatly increase the flexibility of vaccine delivery, and could provide clues as to how to increase the breadth of protection against new virus strains.

“This is a tremendously exciting study that will provide information vital to the roll out of vaccines in the UK and globally. We call on those aged 50 years and above who have not yet received a COVID-19 vaccine to visit the website to find out more about the study and see if there is a study site near them,” Professor Snape added.

The World Health Organisation (WHO) has recently announced that it backs the use of the Oxford vaccine, even with the presence of new variants of Covid-19. While some countries have advised against the use of the Oxford vaccine for over-65s, the WHO believes that the vaccine is suitable for this age group.

As of 9 February, over 13 million people in the UK have received their first dose of the coronavirus vaccine, while more than half a million have gotten their second dose, according to data from the government.

Oxford vaccine effective against Kent variant

0

Preliminary data from researchers at the University of Oxford indicates the ChAdOx1-nCov19 vaccine still effective at causing immunity against the Kent variant.

The B.1.1.7 variant was identified in Kent in late 2019. Mutations in the parts of the virus’ genetic code which determine the structure of the spike protein mean the variant is up to 70% more transmissible than previously circulating variants. This allowed it to become the dominant variant circulating in the United Kingdom. Cases of the variant in the United States are doubling every 10 days.

The vaccine, developed with AstraZeneca, uses an inert adenovirus to introduce a strand of genetic material from the SARS-CoV-2 virus to cause human cells to produce viral spike proteins. Complementary antibodies are produced by the immune system in response to spike proteins. These antibodies remain in the body where they can fight off future infections.

If the structure of the spike protein changes too much compared to previous variants, antibodies produced from vaccination or prior infection will not provide immunity or will be less effective. Mutations in the spike protein of the Kent variant help it attach more tightly onto human cells and replicate more easily, but also slightly alter its shape.

In a pre-print published in The Lancet, which is yet to undergo peer-review, the researchers found that the Oxford vaccine had a similar effectiveness against the Kent variant than previous variants. It was also shown to decrease the viral load in people who have been vaccinated, meaning they are less likely to infect others.

Sarah Gilbert, Chief Investigator on the Oxford vaccine trial, said “Coronaviruses are less prone to mutation than influenza viruses, but we have always expected that as the pandemic continues, new variants will begin to become dominant amongst the viruses that are circulating and that eventually a new version of the vaccine, with an updated spike protein, would be required to maintain vaccine efficacy at the highest level possible.

“We are working with AstraZeneca to optimise the pipeline required for a strain change should one become necessary. This is the same issue that is faced by all of the vaccine developers, and we will continue to monitor the emergence of new variants that arise in readiness for a future strain change.”

Image: Steven Cornfield via unsplash.com

Leaders in Oxford give support for 2040 net zero carbon emissions pledge

0


On 4 February, the leaders of Oxford’s major businesses and organisations expressed their collective support for the aspiration of achieving net zero carbon emissions as a city by 2040, during a virtual Zero Carbon Oxford Summit.

The Summit brought together leaders from both City and County Councils, both universities, both hospital trusts, major businesses, transport providers, schools and further education colleges, anchored institutions, and other organisations that are strategically important to achieving a net zero city by 2040. The Zero Carbon Oxford Charter was signed by 21 leaders from these various organisations.

The closing of the Summit was also marked by the creation of a new Zero Carbon Oxford Partnership for the city. Under this partnership, a collaborative approach to reducing emissions will be taken, and partners will be able to share best practices and learn from each other. The partnership will also develop funding bids and attract financial support for net zero projects, lobby the UK Government for powers, policy, and funding, and engage customers, citizens and communities in shared climate action.

In a press release from the Oxford City Council, Councillor Tom Hayes, Deputy Leader and Cabinet Member for Green Transport and Zero Carbon Oxford said, “It is more important than ever that citizens, organisations, and governments at all levels show leadership to tackle the climate emergency head on. Our joint ambition to become a net zero city by 2040—ten years earlier than the target set by the Government—is a strong sign of the pace and ambition required. 

“It also marks another case of the Council honouring the recommendations of our Citizens’ Assembly on Climate Change. With so many people facing unemployment as a result of the COVID-19 economic crisis, the race to 2040 is an opportunity we can’t refuse – to unlock significant sustainable investment in Oxford that benefits our communities with new jobs and skills,” he added.

Dr David Prout, Pro-Vice Chancellor (Planning at Resources) at the University of Oxford said in the same press release, “Oxford University is fully committed to reducing its impact on the environment. We are in the last stages of consultation on a new University Environmental Sustainability Strategy which proposes a target of net zero carbon and net biodiversity gain by 2035. The University is delighted to be working with others in our community to reduce emissions across Oxford as a whole to net zero by 2040.”

Oxford University’s Environmental Sustainability Strategy aims to achieve net zero carbon and biodiversity net gain by 2035. The strategy focuses on nine priority areas, which include increasing research and engagement in environmental sustainability, reducing carbon emissions related to energy consumption in University buildings to a minimal level, and identifying and reducing the environmental impacts of the University’s consumption and supply chain.

The University also aims to reduce aviation emissions from University staff and student travel and offset the balance of emissions, limit transport emissions by reducing the need to travel, encouraging walking, cycling and the use of public transport and managing the demand to travel by car, and ensure that the University, as an investor, is part of the solution to climate change and biodiversity loss.

Professor Katherine J. Willis CBE, Chair of the Conference of Colleges Sustainability working group and Principal of St Edmund Hall added, “The Conference of Colleges are delighted to be part of the ZCO Partnership and welcome the focus on reducing carbon emissions in Oxford. We look forward to contributing to these conversations and plans for reaching net zero ahead of 2050.”

Image credit: John Fielding, Flickr. CC BY 2.0.

Monetary effect of ‘naming and shaming’ campaigns on multinational companies revealed by a study

0

CW: Violence.

A study conducted in part by Oxford economics professor Nathaniel Lane has analysed alternative frameworks of accountability for multinational companies, rooted in civil society. These include ‘naming and shaming’ campaigns by human rights organisations as well as media coverage associating an event and a company. The case study used looks at the effect of reporting the assassination of environmental activists in association with mining companies in terms of the change in the stock price of the company.

“[Suits] against multinationals for human rights abuses are exceedingly rare”. Of the 354 assassination events recorded over the last 20 years by the study, the majority took place in the Philippines, Peru, and Colombia. The majority of companies associated are headquartered in Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

To address this lack of accountability, “[civil] society groups’ main strategy is to name the mining companies linked with the event.” They then spread this information using “the global news media to make the general public and the financial markets aware of the human rights abuses.”

The study found that “assassinations events lead to negative abnormal returns for firms associated with violence.” In the 10 days following a reported assasination event, the study calculated a media loss in market capitalization of over 100 USD. The effect was larger on the 5th to 10th days, attributed to the time needed for “market participants … [to] gather additional information” and estimate the monetary “[price]” of a tarnished reputation and legal damages. The recorded effects were also larger on days with “low media pressure”, in which there were fewer other large “newsworthy events”.

The study acknowledges that the reactions are more strategically then morally motivated, writing that, in the past, hedge funds have “not shied away from investing in companies associated with regimes responsible for severe human right violations”. The study hopes to use its results as a foundation for further research on the role of “civil society in governing transnational corporate activities at the global periphery.”