Saturday 28th June 2025
Blog Page 412

Covered Market to stay open during lockdown

0

Oxford Covered Market has announced that it will remain open during lockdown. In line with government guidance, food traders within the market will be allowed to operate as before. Restaurants and cafes can offer takeaways but no table service. Other businesses within the market will sell goods online, which customers can pick up at the premises.

The full list of traders who will open as normal is: Bonners Fruit & Vegetables, Cardews of Oxford, David John Pies, Go Gym Stuff, iScream, M Feller & Daughter Butchers, Nash’s Bakery, Oxford Cheese Co, Pershore Seafood, Teardrop Bar, The Market Cellar Door, and Wicked Chocolate.

The following businesses are open for takeaways: A Taste of China, Alpha Bar, Ben’s Cookies, Brothers Cafe, Browns Cafe, Colombia Coffee Roasters, Donburi Inn, Moo-Moo’s, Sasi’s Thai, Sofi de France Cafe, Taylors, and The Oxford Sandwich Company.

Finally, these businesses will operate online for the duration of the lockdown: Blue Blood Sports, Fresh Clothing, Jemini Flowers, John Gowing Jewellers, Next to Nothing, Nothing, Oxford Skate Co., Oxford Soap Company, PinGui, The Cake Shop, The Collectors Company, The Garden of Oxford. A list of the Covered Market traders’ websites can be found here.

A comprehensive list of Oxford businesses that are operating online during the lockdown can also be found here.

Boris Johnson announced last Saturday that the whole of England would be placed under Tier 4 Restrictions from Thursday 5th November for four weeks until Wednesday 2nd December. Although schools and universities will remain open, all non-essential businesses have been ordered to close, although food takeaway and deliveries can continue.

Different households are not permitted to mix inside or in private gardens unless they are in your support bubble. You can meet one person outside your household for outdoor exercise, but people are encouraged to stay home except for essential activities. 

The rules for this lockdown are slightly different from the rules during the previous one. While businesses cannot serve customers, they can keep their premises open as a base for deliveries and click and collect.

The Covered Market is a frequent hotspot for tourists, who are attracted by its wide range of independent businesses located right in the city centre. It is now managed by Oxford City Council. The market was forced to close for the duration of the summer lockdown.  

Councillor Mary Clarkson, Cabinet Member for City Centre, Covered Market and Culture, said: “The months leading up to Christmas are vital for a lot of Covered Market traders, so the lockdown has come at a really bad time.

“But the traders are – as ever – simply amazing, and I think they’re all determined to make this work. To help them achieve that, we’ve decided to keep the Covered Market open. So if you’re looking to buy fresh food during lockdown or if you’re already starting to think about your Christmas presents, please support your market.”

Image credit: Jorge Royan / Wikimedia Commons

Oxford City Council launches anti-racist charter

0

The Oxford City Council has launched an Anti-Racism Charter to contend with the “systemic racism” within the city.

The Charter defines Anti-Semitism, Islamophobia, and Anti-black racism, while making a commitment to work towards making Oxford an Anti-Racist city. 

Three commitments are given as initial actions to be taken: an annual review of the Charter, showcasing the talent and achievements of ethnic minorities and people of colour, and launching an Anti-Racist City Quality Mark that groups can adopt after signing and committing to the principles within the Charter.

Preceding the Charter, the Oxford City Council has been working to tackle racism more actively for over a year, having pledged to make Oxford an Anti-Racist city in August 2019. This has been further supported by the Council adopting definitions of both Islamophobia and Anti-Semitism and deciding to become a City of Sanctuary by making a commitment to supporting asylum seekers, refugees and migrants.

The Charter begins with the Council’s aim: “Our vision is: Collectively committed to being proactive, in making Oxford an anti-racist city.”

This is followed by statements promising to “have difficult and sometimes uncomfortable conversations about what it means in practice to be anti-racist”, to recognise institutional racism, and to understand that racism includes “unconscious, unintentional and indirect actions”.

The Council adds: “Without understanding the root causes of racism and how it affects people we cannot dismantle the institutional structures which give rise to it.”

The Council involved individuals from different groups and people of colour who have lived experience of racism. Seven focus groups have also been held, where issues like suitable terminology were discussed.

Launched digitally, the celebration included presentations from Councillors, an Oxford youth music performance, and recognition of those who have signed the Charter. In a press release, the Council stated that “representatives from schools, universities, businesses and communities will formally sign up to the charter at the event”.

A coalition of societies to fight racism has criticised the City Council for not dealing with racism in the city.

It said: “Currently as a result of pressure from below all our major institutions are announcing anti-racist charters and race equality action plans. The obvious danger here is that without sustained pressure from the grass-roots demanding greater accountability to local communities what we get left with is rhetorical ethics, tokenism and symbolic representation.”

Councillor Susan Brown, leader of the City Council, said: “Oxford’s Anti-Racism Charter is a step forward to tackle issues associated with structural and institutional racism. By understanding these issues, why they exist, we have the opportunity to ensure we are a city that works for everyone. It’s a challenge for us all to do things better, to be just and fairer, and a commitment from some of our biggest institutions to go further to tackle racism.”

Image credit: SJPrice/ Pixabay

Oxford faces calls to move all teaching online

0

The University of Oxford will stay open despite the introduction of a national lockdown from Thursday.

As an educational institution, Oxford will continue to offer some in-person teaching. Planned in-person exams will go ahead in a COVID-secure setting and libraries will remain open.

The Oxford branch of the University and College Union (UCU) has written an open letter to the Vice-Chancellor demanding that all non-essential teaching moves online.

It calls on Oxford to follow SAGE advice which recommended universities transfer all teaching online unless face-to-face teaching is “absolutely essential”. Only teaching which involves practical or lab work should continue in person, Oxford UCU says.

It also calls for asymptomatic testing and for publicly available statistics on case numbers as they occur.

The letter, which has over 100 signatures, says: “Community members, the City Council, and businesses have worked hard to keep Oxford safe over the summer. It is now time for the University of Oxford to step up and play its part.

“We, as local residents, are concerned that the University’s activities will see a further escalation of cases, worsening the public health emergency and increasing the potential for local lockdowns.

“Oxford is one of the most unequal cities in the UK. The University has a responsibility to protect the community that lives alongside it. If the University is unable to demonstrate that it can ensure the safety of its staff, students, and the wider community, then it should cease all face-to-face activities.”

In an email to students, Pro-Vice-Chancellor Martin Williams confirmed that Oxford will not change its teaching policy in light of new restrictions. Final Honours Chemistry exams will still take place in the Examination Schools. However, Oxford University museums will close and restrictions on sport are expected.

Unlike the last lockdown, educational institutions can stay open and are exempt from some restrictions. The lockdown will last until 2nd December, three days before the official end of Michaelmas Term.

Some universities, such as King’s College London and Sheffield Hallam, have moved non-essential teaching online. The national UCU body has written to all Vice-Chancellors in England to request they adopt this measure.

The University reported 212 cases among students and staff for the week 24th-30th October. Across the city, Oxford has 135 cases per 100,000 people. This is below the average area in England, which has 153 cases, according to the BBC.

Aris Katzourakis, co-Vice-President of Oxford UCU, told Cherwell: “Oxford UCU has been pushing for the safest possible working conditions for its staff, the students, and the wider community. Over the summer, we have been trying to ensure these conditions, both for those that have been onsite throughout, but also for the beginning of term.

“As term approached, seeing the clear epidemiological situation, we have been arguing that as much teaching as possible should be done online, and that it was unnecessary to force students to return whether it was essential for them to do so or not.

“We are deeply disappointed by Monday’s announcement by the Vice-Chancellor that in person teaching is to continue despite the lockdown. We have written an open letter and urge all those who are concerned with the levels of in person teaching to sign it.”

A University statement said: “The University will continue to offer a mix of in-person and online teaching, in line with Government guidance for the new lockdown.  Planned in-person examinations will also continue to be administered in a COVID-secure setting, and libraries will remain open, as will our parks and gardens.  We will have to close our museums to the public, and there will likely be additional restrictions to sport – details of which will follow in the near future.

Oxford UCU has reaffirmed that the University should make COVID-19 related risk assessments available to staff unions. In August, the University said it is not “practical or useful to share all risk assessments with the Oxford UCU” and that it had met with unions frequently to discuss health and safety.

Image Credit to Theonlysilentbob/ Wikimedia Commons

Rapid COVID-19 test to be trialled on Oxford students

A rapid COVID-19 test that provides results within 30 minutes is being tested on student volunteers at Merton College and St. Hilda’s, as well as Durham University. 

The Feasibility and Acceptability of community COVID-19 rapid Testing Strategies (FACTS) study will assess the feasibility of the self-administered Lateral Flow Test in tracking COVID-19 in pre-symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals. This is part of the government’s “Operation Moonshot”, aiming for regular mass testing to reduce the spread of the virus. 

The Lateral Flow Immunoassay Test (LFIA) requires individuals to take a swab of their nose and throat and insert it into a tube of liquid for a short time, with a result provided after 20 to 30 minutes. They are aimed at potentially supplementing, rather than replacing, the standard use of RT-PCR (reference test polymerase chain reaction) tests.

Students will be asked to self-administer the LFIAs each week. Students have been provided with an explanatory video, will be offered an opportunity to ask researchers questions and are free to withdraw without giving any reason at any time. If they are unable or would not like to self-administer the test, students will be asked to attend a screening clinic “where the FACTS team will conduct the test and record the results”, explains the Participant Information Sheet.

As well as this, students will be asked to track their symptoms daily using the study’s app, and to conduct some five-minute online surveys on “the acceptability of the testing strategy”. The Participation Information Sheet explains that “a subset of participants [will also be asked] to take part in an interview to explore their experience and views of testing, what worked, and what could be done better.”

The pilot study is being organised by researchers at the University of Oxford’s Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, in partnership with the Department of Health and Public Health England. It is receiving funding internally from the University. LFTs have been validated and undergone clinical testing. All participation in the study by students is voluntary. The study has been also been approved by the University Research Ethics Committee,

Professor Irene Tracy, Warden at Merton College, said in an email to students: “We believe this project will be an important contribution to national and international efforts to defeat the current pandemic and its wider consequences. The learnings will also be important in preparedness for future epidemics and pandemics.”

One student who had decided to take part explained why they got involved: “I wanted to do my bit, and I thought that it was incredible that I could be a part of something like this. It was a no-brainer, especially considering I’ve got vulnerable family members at home and I want to do what I can to make the world a little bit safer for them again.”

Students who receive a positive Lateral Flow Test result will be required to take the standard RT-PCR (reference test polymerase chain reaction) test via the NHS or Oxford University’s Early Alert Service, and self-isolate as necessary.

Oxford University have said that “it is hoped it [the LFIA test] will help identify those most at risk of spreading COVID-19 (those who are infectious, but not aware of this) and enable them to alter their behaviour accordingly, thereby breaking the chains of transmission and reducing the infection rate.”

The Pro-Vice Chancellor said that if the study proves effective, they aim to extend it across the whole University. 

What The Write Offs tells us about literacy in Britain

0

Bake Off finishes, mum flicks through the TV guide a bit, turns back to Channel 4. “It’s Sandi’s new thing. There’s nothing else on.” We’re looking at a man in a smart shirt, black waistcoat, no tie, mid-thirties perhaps, being asked by Sandi Toksvig how to spell ‘clock’. He stumbles through the letters, strain obvious on his face, a questioning tone of voice making his struggle clear. “Well, you’ve inadvertently spelled ‘cock’, I don’t know if you’re okay with that.”

It’s looking like some kind of naff reality TV: ‘watch these fully grown adults fail at life!’ kind of thing. Clips of a team of eight trying to read a recipe aloud, follow written instructions, and spell words like ‘while’ and ‘child’ aloud – all unsuccessfully. These adults use fully conversant English when speaking, with average vocabularies and no difficulties in speech comprehension. I can’t quite work out why exactly these people, double, triple my age, are getting excited by writing the word ‘tube’ correctly.

By this point, I’m about to reach for my headphones and watch last week’s Gogglebox. The show seems a mixture of silly and frustrating and to be honest, I’m tired, I’ve been reading all day, and I don’t have the mental energy to watch other people try.

“Sorry mum, I just can’t watch this. Like… this can’t be real. How could you be an adult and not be able to read?” This was said more in a tone of dismay than genuine questioning, but she replies, “Well, I can believe it. Some people just never learnt. If you don’t really get it by the end of primary school, and no one helps in secondary school, then no one’s going to teach you.”

I can’t quite grasp the show’s angle, but Toksvig’s tone makes it clear that there are genuine, heartfelt intentions behind these scenes that feel unfamiliar to me. Dyslexia and other learning difficulties had been mentioned by this point, but the idea that reading and writing could still be inaccessible skills to adults had never really crossed my mind before. The remainder of The Write Offs showed me that it really should have crossed my mind, and it has been occupying it a lot since.

Paul, 43, is currently talking about his new-born. “I just don’t wanna [sic] be the guy who, when his kid comes home from school, at four or five, and goes ‘Daddy, what does this mean?’, doesn’t have the answer.” He’s shown trying to read a from a packet of nappies. “Er… it could be anything at all.” Sandi tells us he has the reading and writing age of a seven-year-old.

The eight ‘learners’ are now reading from a script together. It’s Paul’s turn, and he has visibly frozen up. This has happened many times so far in the program, and his response to Toksvig’s question of whether he is okay is not surprising either: “It’s kind of a bit scary.”

But the next few minutes shock me.

“I was an English and drama teacher. Three and a half years ago I had a stroke, damaged the left-hand side of my brain, and now I can’t read and write. It just changed everything really quickly, everything had gone in a second.”

The camera pans to him attempting to read a line of dialogue, squinting and stuttering on every word. He tries four times to say the word “effects”.

“My favourite stuff was Shakespeare. I have the complete Shakespeare at home, probably about three or four versions of it, in a box, in my garage.”

So do I. I’m an English student. I love Shakespeare. I could go now and pick up anything of his and read through it. Just like Paul could. Now he cannot even read the word ‘budget’.

Nothing has hit me as hard as this minute of TV for months. I had been sat in my little ivory tower of ‘well, why didn’t they just learn?’, but now I felt all that come down. Because I could see myself in Paul: exactly what happened to him could happen to me. I was hit by a basic lesson: you should not assume that everyone is starting from an equal point.

From here, I stayed a lot quieter, trying to properly digest the program and actually listen to the eight, rather than just my own preconceptions about what their difficulties in reading and writing must say about them. I feel like Craig is speaking directly to me when he says, “People who can read and write do take it for granted. […] Unless you’re in the situation you don’t know how hard it is.” Craig has dyslexia, along with at least 10% of the population.

Disruption to the everyday life of someone with dyslexia can range from slightly longer processing times when reading and writing, struggling to remember the words someone used, to thorough disruption of what most would consider their usual routine. But dyslexia does not affect IQ: people such as Einstein and de Vinci are now thought to have been on the dyslexic spectrum.

The number of British adults who struggle to read and write includes some who are dyslexic, and some like Paul who have suffered brain injuries. Many other factors may place people in the category of ‘functionally illiterate’, which the National Literacy Trust describes as those who can “understand short straightforward texts on familiar topics accurately and independently, and obtain information from everyday sources, but reading information from unfamiliar sources, or on unfamiliar topics, could cause problems.” Over 7 million people in the UK are functionally illiterate.

“I can believe it,” my mum replies after I sceptically read this stat out to her. She works in one of the local village primary schools. “Some of the kids who leave us, they can barely read and write. No one’s going to sit down and teach them how to write at secondary school if they don’t already know. I think we fail them.”

Most children start reading around the age of 4, but if they are not talked to, listened to, asked questions, and interacted with in other ways from the earliest stages of their cognitive development, it will be exponentially harder for them to catch up with the progression of their peers as they grow.

This is why affective access and outreach are important. Essential. We sit in the libraries of Oxford, reading ground-breaking theses, while in this very constituency 12.5% of residents hold no qualifications. We cannot strive for progression in our diverse fields without considering where progression is needed, closer to home: the UK has the largest literacy gap between employed and unemployed in the Western world.

Clearly, the decisions being made at the top are not filtering down to make an effective system. Perhaps this is partly because those decision-makers are ignorant of the reality. With a cabinet that was 64% privately educated (compared to 7% of the country as a whole), this is hardly surprising.

Government-backed research has found that schools with an ‘Outstanding’ Ofsted rating have better performing students than those from schools that ‘Require Improvement’. Selective and fee-paying schools have the best performing students. You don’t need me to tell you that most of the best performing children are thus from most affluent families. Of course, not all well-off people have high literacy rates, and many less-well-off people do. But the trend is still striking: Britain’s most influential people are over 5 times more likely to have been to a fee-paying school than the general populatio[EH1] n. While the results of this system are far from the only factors limiting the literacy levels of UK adults, they are a large part that needs urgent addressing. The Write Offs shows that effective help can most definitely be given: all eight of the participants progressed at least 3 school-years of reading and writing in 16 weeks.

34-year-old Dean, a telecoms engineer with the reading age of a nine-year-old, reminded us at the end of the program why this help is necessary.

 “Did you know that there is a staggering number of young offenders with reading and writing difficulties. Now, imagine if these young offenders were given a teacher like we’ve had. Someone to tell them that their big, beautiful brains just think differently to everybody else’s and need teaching in a different, more informed way. Albert Einstein, Sir Issac Newton, Thomas Edison, all had a dyslexic brain, just like mine. My question to you all is do you think we could stop wasting good minds? Do you think we could unlock the next Einstein?”


Wake up and smell the… nothing

Coronavirus affects the body in a plethora of different ways. It infects the upper respiratory tract leading to a cough and shortness of breath, it causes congestion that blocks sinus drainage passages and leads to headaches, it triggers the body’s production of cytokines leading to fever and inflammation and for many people, it messes around with their sense of smell and taste.

Our ability to detect smells and odours comes from a little, specialised piece of tissue in our nasal cavities known as the olfactory epithelium. This patch, whilst it appears small, actually contains around 50 million nerve cells covered in tiny hairs. These are called cilia and they have receptors that can bind the molecules that enter your nose and dissolve into the mucus that lines your nasal passages. This binding triggers an electrical signal that travels to the olfactory bulb, which is a sort of neuron relay station. They are then passed along the olfactory nerve, which carries the signal to your brain. Every odour we experience produces a unique firing pattern of neurons, allowing us to distinguish between similar smells.

A lot of cases of anosmia are caused by malfunctions in some part of this olfactory system. There are many known respiratory viruses that interfere with our ability to smell and it seems that coronavirus is able to do this not by attacking the olfactory nerve cells directly but the cells that support them.

The researchers at Harvard who discovered this are encouraged by their findings as it suggests the virus is unlikely to cause permanent damage. “I think it’s good news” said Sandeep Robert Datta, one of the co-authors of the Harvard paper, “because once the infection clears, olfactory neurons don’t appear to need to be replaced or rebuilt from scratch.” That means anosmia should be temporary, disappearing once the infection has been cleared.

But if coronavirus affects the olfactory neurons, why is that so many people find they can’t taste either? Well, only some of what we taste comes from our taste buds. There are hundreds of these taste buds found in each of the thousands of the little bumps, or papillae, on your tongue. These are able to detect the sensations of bitterness, sweetness, sourness, saltiness and umami. However, most of what we taste actually comes from the aroma of food. These odours travel down our nasal passages, where we detect them, rather than coming from your mouth. If you bite into a strawberry, your tongue will detect that it is sweet, but it is the aromas in your nose that tell you it’s strawberry flavoured.

It was about three days after my positive test result that I noticed I couldn’t taste or smell things as well as I normally could. I stopped being able to taste cups of tea (a realisation that any British person will find deeply upsetting) and I didn’t notice the burning toast that nearly set off our fire alarm. Soon I couldn’t taste or smell anything much at all. Ageusia, the scientific term for partial or complete loss of the ability to taste, is a pretty perplexing experience.

Once you lose your ability to taste, what do you eat? I had a lot of people in my house joking that it would be the perfect time to go on a health kick. “Eat nothing but kale,” one of them laughed, “you won’t be able to tell how bad it is.” That is one potential strategy, but it disregards the multifaceted role that food plays in our modern lives. Most of us are fortunate enough to be able to select what we eat largely based on what we feel like and what we will enjoy; food is not simply a fuel, but is instead a means of socialising, a response to emotions, a way to fill the time (and once you’re in isolation – you really aren’t short on time). And on top of that food is a multisensory experience. Especially if you can’t smell, as I couldn’t, the texture of the foods and the way they look becomes a whole lot more important. Just because you can’t taste it, that doesn’t mean you will be satisfied after eating a big bowl of kale.

So, what did I eat? Everyone who I have spoken to has had a slightly different experience of losing their taste and smell, but I personally found that the foods I wanted to eat were low on flavour and big on texture. This might sound counter-intuitive when your tasting capacity is reduced, but I found something comforting about eating foods that didn’t taste of much even when I could taste everything. I particularly liked foods with very distinctive textures; things like crisp iceberg lettuce, airy rice cakes, buttery toast, crunchy bowls of cereal and creamy avocado (I was very surprised to find out that even at my lowest tasting ability, I could also still taste avocado – I found my middle-class silver lining).

Now it has been a week since my other coronavirus symptoms stopped, but I still cannot taste or smell much at all. In spite of that, I am still hopeful. The research does seem to suggest that it will come back eventually. If not, I’ll have to eat my words. Luckily, they won’t taste of much.  

Oxford artist spotlight: in conversation with LZYBY

0

Emerging from the depths of lockdown, Oxford-based singer LZYBY (George Cobb) has made light work of spelling ‘Lazy Boy’, and even lighter work of establishing a name for himself.  Not only did his debut single, ‘When the Rain Stops’, land him an interview on BBC Oxford, ‘Frustration’ has featured on articles with slightly more relevance than this one, and he’s got a six-track EP, Lazy &Waiting, dropping later this month.

As we sit down for a chat over a beer in my Cowley-based kitchen, he tells me that LZYBY encapsulates how he’s not “an overly serious person”. As to why he wanted a stage name? “George Cobb is quite dull as names go. It’s just two syllables: George. Cobb.” I can’t argue with that.

For transparency and Covid’s sake, I have to admit that my kitchen is also his kitchen. He may be Oxford’s hottest new Singer/Producer, but he’s also my housemate and, I suppose, quite a good friend. But don’t you worry: while I value our friendship, I value my integrity as a student journalist far more. What follows is a completely unrehearsed, authentic interview between an up-and-coming artist and his up-and-coming friend.

I get the ball rolling with a few icebreakers. Slightly surprised to see him take this seriously, I follow suit, asking how this all came about. Was LZYBY born in lockdown, or bred by it?

“I’d say [lockdown] gave me the time and space to pursue it. I mean, everything’s that’s being going on this year has been…” he proceeds with caution, “…pretty dreadful. But as a silver lining, it did suddenly give heaps of time. I’d always wondered, what if I taught myself to produce music? […] But it was one of those things I thought I’d never actually pursue.”

I ask how, as a self-taught producer, his creative process has developed since those early lockdown days. 

“Wow that’s a good question.”I nod in agreement, impressed by his perception.

“I think that I have simplified things more. When I first started, I went quite over the top with it […] but it got very complicated and it made it sound worse. […] I ’d keep thinking I’ve got to use entirely new instruments otherwise people will notice, and it would be less original. But actually, finding your sound and binding all your songs together is having those similar building blocks, but using them in different ways.” 

We both murmur a knowing “less is more”.

LZYBY’s soon-to-be released songs feature powerful and intricately layered violin arrangements. They are coming to shape LZYBY’s sound, bringing an atmospheric moodiness that’s beautiful, yet at times melancholic.

“Basically, I’m a huge fan of Kelsey Lu. She performs live with her cello and I always thought that was so cool. Then I thought, hang on, I play the violin. […] It’s nice to be able to record a live instrument.  You can get that similar degree of emotion and sort of rawness playing an instrument live as you can singing live.”

We talk about his upcoming gig at the Moustache Barin Dalston this November. While he’s not sure it will definitely go ahead, he says it’s an exciting starting point. I’m reminded of the constant uncertainty we’re facing at the moment, and ask what are the biggest challenges that he’s faced starting out as an artist in a pandemic. 

“Performing is one of the big things. [University] would’ve been a really great way to ease myself in and get comfortable performing. I could have performed at student-run societies and small venues in Oxford where all of my friends could’ve come […] Whereas right now it’s as if I’m doing this all on my own, almost in secret in my bedroom. Then one day suddenly it’s like, oh god, now I’ve got to perform it all.”   

I probe him as to whether he felt anxiety in putting his songs out there for everyone to hear. Was there anything that nearly held him back from releasing that first song, ‘When the Rain Stops’?

“Well I hadn’t sung for a while because I’d had a vocal injury when I was eighteen. I didn’t actually sing until my third year at university.”

“Nodes?” I exclaim incredulously, thinking Pitch-Perfect had made it up.

“Mmm, correct. I lost a lot of my confidence. […] My friends at university were aware that I sang but had never heard me sing, so there was definitely that anticipation of throwing a blinder on everyone. [‘When the Rain Stops’] is also written about someone, quite, you know, um, a very, like, special person; I was aware he would hear it and it might be quite strange for him. But, at the end of the day, I was really proud of the song. I put a lot of work into it, and I wanted people to hear it.  That took priority in the end.”

The conversation moves on to his upcoming EP and the inspiration behind it.

“It was all written when I was 21, that time of your life where most people are becoming adults […] When you’re crossing that line, you’re faced with all these questions of, like, What do I want to do? What do I want to be? Who do I want to be?

He adds there’s definitely an uplifting side to it. “I learnt a lot about myself through writing this EP. I discovered so many personal quirks that I had either not been aware of before or had been embarrassed about. I think I learnt to embrace them and express those qualities.”

I ask about the role that queerness plays in his music, knowing George to be openly gay since I met him. “I definitely want to embrace a lot of queer culture into my music. It’s something that I’m trying to embrace more into me as a person. Again, it’s one of those things that I almost feel l turned a blind eye to.”

I express surprise at this since he’s always seemed, at least to me, completely confident in his sexuality. I remember how he made the whole process of coming out at university much easier for me in our first year.

He explains that while he felt assured enough to come out to his parents at the age of eleven, and to his friends at sixteen, “I was at an age where people weren’t as accepting as they are now.  I still had a good time of it and didn’t get bullied, well pretty much, and I still had really strong friendships. But, I almost think part of the reason for that is I subconsciously buried some of those elements of my personality to make myself more palatable to the society I was growing up in. […] There are probably so many more parts of me that would want to engage with [queer] culture way more than I have thus far.”

We discuss how coming out early brings with it with a different kind of cost. “There’s a small print: you can come out and it can be fine, but don’t be too gay”,he adds jokingly. But I realise that LZYBY clearly means something far more to George than just the music: it’s an unashamed exploration and celebration of all aspects of his identity.

As to his plans for after we graduate next year? “Fully commit to music. I love my degree and my university, but I’m excited to start the next stage of my life.”

I end by asking how we can support up-and-coming artists like LZYBY during an ongoing pandemic.

“To be honest, there’s more of an issue right now with the wider music industry in general, especially the live industry. […] So if you can, donate to your local live venues. There are various charities that have been set up to gain funds for them. Or, write to your MP and encourage them to get the government to put together some sort of a grant to look after these businesses that are probably going to be the last ones to come out of this.”

On such a poignant note I stop recording, thanking him for his time. He laughs and suggests we have another beer and watch some Schitt’s Creek.

LZYBY’s debut EP, Lazy & Waiting, is out on all streaming platforms on 6th November 2020.

BREAKING: University reports 212 cases this week

0

The University’s testing service has confirmed 212 cases of COVID-19 among students and staff for the week 24th-30th October, with a positivity rate of 29.2%. This marks the third consecutive week in which the number of new cases has remained constant and brings the total number of confirmed cases since the implementation of the University’s testing service on August 20th to 708.

The University’s Status and Response website states that the figures released do not include positive test results received outside of the University testing service. It notes further that “due to the time interval between a test being done and the result becoming available, it is expected that there will be a mismatch between actual results and those confirmed to us on any given day”.

On Saturday, Oxford was moved into Tier 2, which will remain in place until new national lockdown restrictions come into place on Thursday. Following the government announcement on Saturday night, the University has updated its guidelines: “New National Restrictions will be introduced from this Thursday (5 November). The University is now considering the impact of these measures, and further information will be made available on these pages as soon as possible. You should also refer to the UK Government website for the latest advice.”

Figure 1: Cumulative COVID-19 Cases recorded by the University’s testing service. Data: https://www.ox.ac.uk/coronavirus/status
Figure 2: New COVID-19 Cases recorded by the University’s testing service. Data: https://www.ox.ac.uk/coronavirus/status

Until Thursday, Oxford will remain in Tier 2 and residents will have to adhere to the following new measures:

  • People cannot meet “socially” with anybody outside their household or support bubble indoors, including at home or in public places such as restaurants and bars. 
  • People should try to reduce the number of journeys they are making, and if they need to travel should avoid public transport where possible. 

The University has implemented a four-stage emergency response, depending on how wide the spread of COVID-19 is. The current status is Stage 2, which allows the University to operate “in line with social distancing restrictions with as full a student cohort as possible on site”, with teaching and assessment taking place “with the optimum combination of in-person teaching and online learning”. A Stage 3 response would imply “no public access to the University or College buildings” and “gatherings for staff and students only permitted where essential for teaching and assessment to take place”.

Conflict in the Caucasus: The escalation of the Armenian and Azerbaijani conflict

0

Recent clashes between Armenia and Azerbaijan have left many dead on both sides. As a result, further violent protests took place around the world. Cher and the Kardashians have been among the many outspoken individuals, seeking to raise awareness and demand action.

Both sides accuse the other country of igniting the conflict. The fighting has been conducted mainly through artillery and drones, to deadly effect. The current skirmishes appear to show the most serious spike in hostilities since the April War of 2016 which saw hundreds killed over several days of fighting.

Violence erupted in the afternoon of the 12th of July along the two countries’ northern border of the Tovuz District of Azerbaijan which borders Armenia’s Tavush Province. 16 people are reported to have been killed, a civilian amongst them.

In a statement released by Azerbaijan’s foreign ministry, it was revealed that the civilian killed was a 76-year-old member of the village of Agdam. It claims the attacks on the civilian population were deliberate and “an integral part of Armenia’s aggressive policy”. It went on to add that Armenian armed forces “continuously” shelled Azerbaijani population centres from heavy weapons and also seriously damaged people’s farmsteads and properties, and infrastructure in residential areas.

The violence left multiple Azerbaijani servicemen dead. Protests were sparked in the country’s capital Baku following the funeral of an army general who was killed. An estimated 30,000 people took to the streets demanding the Azeri government fully deploy the army in all-out war against Armenia demanding “Start the war” while shouting “Death to Armenians” and “Karabakh is ours”. Several demonstrators also managed to break into the parliament building.

Armenia, meanwhile, has accused Azerbaijan of bombing a Kindergarten building in the village of Aygepar. Reports have also emerged of Azerbaijani forces using human shields in order to attack the Armenian position. Azerbaijani soldiers allegedly used the gardens and yards of civilians in order to fire at Armenian forces knowing that return fire would not be possible. There have also been reports of the Azerbaijani military opening fire in the direction of a mask production factory, which plays an essential part in the country’s coronavirus response. A Chernobyl style ‘catastrophe’ has also been threatened by the Azerbaijani Defence Ministry spokesperson who has claimed that Azerbaijani drones are capable of targeting an Armenian nuclear power station.

This is no new occurrence. The two countries have been locked in conflict over the Nagorno – Karabakh region since the end of the 1994 war, which followed the collapse of the Soviet Union. The territory is currently inhabited by ethnic Armenians and is known locally as Artsakh. It is nevertheless internationally recognised as part of Azerbaijan.

The recent violence took place to the north of the disputed territory which led the Turkish foreign ministry to claim that the attacks were “attempts by Armenia to divert the attention of the international community from the illegal occupation of the Azerbaijani territory of Nagorno-Karabakh… and to block the political solution by adding new dimensions to the conflict”. Turkey is Azerbaijan’s closest political ally.

Russia, one of Armenia’s closest allies, has called any escalation of the situation “unacceptable” and urged restraint and compliance with the ceasefire on both sides. Trust in Russia has declined in Armenia recently according to public opinion surveys. Russian arms sales to Azerbaijan despite its strategic partnership with Armenia may be one of the factors behind such a decline.

Around the world protests and violence by the diasporas of both countries have taken place. In Los Angeles, a violent clash between Armenian protestors and Azerbaijani protestors erupted in front of the Azerbaijani consulate resulting in the injury of four people, including a police officer. In London, scuffles broke out in front of the Armenian Embassy between Azerbaijani protestors and Armenian counter protestors. “Safarov” was allegedly chanted by the Azeri side. Ramil Safarov is an Azerbaijani Army Officer who axed an Armenian soldier to death in his sleep during a NATO sponsored training seminar in Budapest. Having been convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment in Hungary, he was then extradited back to Azerbaijan, welcomed as a hero and pardoned by the president Ilham Aliyev.

Prominent celebrities have also tweeted their solidarity with Armenia over the recent conflict. Cher tweeted about Azerbaijan’s threat to bomb Armenia’s nuclear power station. Kim Kardashian tweeted about Azerbaijan’s unprovoked attack on Armenia during a global pandemic, ignoring the UN’s appeal for a global ceasefire. The hashtag #SupportArmenia has been widely circulated on social media platforms. Baroness Cox has also written to Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab urging a firm stance be taken by the British Government to work with the Armenian Government to ensure security in the region. She has also urged immediate steps be taken to promote de-escalation of the conflict.

Despite unanimous calls for the de-escalation of the conflict, deep ethnic and historic ties to the territory on both sides means that a resolution to the conflict seems unlikely in the near future.

Fatima doesn’t want a job in cyber – and she knows it

0

Throughout the pandemic, the government has been repeatedly criticised for their lack of support for the arts. This was compounded last week with the government’s cyber recruitment advertisements. One of these adverts included a ballet dancer sitting next to the text, ‘Fatima’s next job could be in cyber. (She just doesn’t know it yet).’ The internet exploded at the crass advert. Many pointed out that the advert was only made possible by people in the creative industries, including ballet dancers. This was only made worse by the Culture Secretary visiting the Royal Academy of Dance the same day. At a time when thousands of performers have been unemployed for months and with no sign of being able to return to work, was the internet right in its fury?

The dance industry has been one of the worst-hit sectors of the performing arts. The Royal Opera House has lost £3 of every £5. They are now selling a David Hockney painting, estimated at £18 million, to save jobs. The English National Ballet had to furlough 85% of its ballet dancers and staff and saw its lowest box office takings since 2011, below 40%. Tours and productions have been cancelled, dancers have had to make the gut-wrenching decision over whether to stay in the UK or return to their home country and social distancing rules has meant that dancers have been unable to dance with others.

Ballet, indeed any performing art, is not an easy career choice. I should know. Since the age of four I have trained to become a musician and now work as a freelance composer. I studied for years to hone my craft before reaching an undergraduate and postgraduate level. I’ve put in hundreds of hours practising, rehearsing and studying to perform at the highest level possible. I’ve travelled sometimes hundreds of miles across the country to pursue my chosen career and supported the cost of my training by working, sometimes multiple jobs at a time. This is not so that I can have a hobby that I can pick up or drop whenever I fancy, but so that I can have a career in a sector that is constantly challenging and brings a huge amount to the country, spiritually and financially.

This was not the first insult that the government had made towards the creative industries since this pandemic began. At the start of the pandemic, the government stated that performers, the majority of which are freelancers, could claim some of their income through the Self-Employment Income Support Scheme. However, it soon became apparent that freelancers would only be able to claim 20% of their income. It took the government months before proudly announcing a £1.57 billion package for the arts in July. Unlike packages other countries were using to support those working in the arts, the government’s package meant that money could only be used to protect venues and businesses. It did not support the people who make the arts possible. The final insult was made by Rishi Sunak’s in an interview to ITV News where, when asked specifically about support for musicians and those in the arts, Sunak suggested that only jobs that were ‘viable’ would be supported and saved and that people should retrain.

All of this has occurred at a time when the arts have been in greater demand than ever before. People across the world have turned online to watch British films, television series’, plays, ballets and concerts as well as the flood of free material that our artists have poured online. At a time when people have been unable to see and support loved ones, sometimes for months at a time, the public has turned to the arts to help express their feelings and reconnect with people. For the government to repeatedly disregard the tremendous contribution the arts have made during this pandemic is thoughtless at best and at worst offensive.

The idea that the natural progression from ending a ballet career should be working in cyber shows a huge lack of understanding of the industry. Many ballet dancers on ending a performance career continue in the industry in some form, whether as a teacher, choreographer, director, ballet master/mistress, community arts therapist, performance psychologist, physical physiotherapist, arts journalist, fitness trainer, studio owner. Why wouldn’t they? They’ve invested a lifetime’s work into an industry that they are highly knowledgeable and skilled in. Why would they abandon it?

Fatima doesn’t need to retrain. She trained for decades and invested financially and personally to an arts industry that contributed £32.3 billion to the economy in 2018, according to the government’s own report. The thousands of students currently training in the arts don’t need to retrain. They are working in an industry that studies have proven time and again to improve children’s development and our mental and physical health. Those already in the arts don’t need to retrain. They already have a wealth of skills that, if this government is not careful, they will take abroad where they can use them and be respected. The arts are more than ‘viable’. They are vital. When will the government realise this?