Monday, May 19, 2025
Blog Page 242

2023 English finals to be open-book

0

While many parts of Oxford life have transitioned back to a state of pre-Pandemic normality, the English Faculty has announced that the majority of finals papers in 2023 will be held online.

Course I papers 2, 3, 4, and 5, and Course II papers 1, 2, and 3 will be held in an eight-hour open-book format. Meanwhile, students studying Old Norse, Medieval Welsh for beginners, Old and Middle Irish for beginners, for Course II paper 6 will sit three-hour closed-book exams.

Finalists in 2024 will sit closed-book handwritten exams in the Examination Schools. The Faculty say they will provide further details at the start of Michaelmas Term 2022. 

These arrangements have been announced in order to give students clarity about their exams ahead of time. Through the 2022-23 academic year, the Faculty will review their assessment system “to make decisions about the best way to assess English students’ work”.

The 2023 cohort of finalists sat their preliminary examinations in an eight-hour open-book format. Sohaib Hassan, a student from this cohort at Hertford College, told Cherwell that he didn’t feel the lengthy online format suited him. “But it’s a relief to know that we won’t be expected to drastically change the exam and essay format we’ve been used to,” he added.
Finalists across different courses will have varying experiences in upcoming years. Unlike English students, History finalists will sit the majority of their exams in-person. PPE finalists in 2022 will sit open-book economics finals, but closed-book finals for politics and philosophy.

Image: Mike Knell/CC BY-SA 2.0 via flickr.com

Stepping into the unknown: anxieties about the year abroad

0

The Year Abroad – exciting and ominous words which all students of Modern Languages are faced with from the moment they begin university. Echoes of the compulsory year spent abroad begin in first year, until the words themselves become deafening in second year as tutors, parents, and friends all weigh in with their advice, hopes and ambitions.

Often considered a ‘rite of passage’ for Modern Linguists, the year abroad was for many, myself included, a significant selling point of the Modern Languages degree. The chance to experience life for a year in the countries whose languages you spend so much time studying is both exciting and invaluable, and it is certainly presented that way. On hearing that I was going abroad in my third year, the most common reaction I received was one of wonder, exclamations of jealousy and many comments on the special nature of this opportunity. My best friend described it as chance to ‘find myself’, my mum described it as a chance ‘to grow as a person’ and experience a year of travel with relatively little responsibility. All these inviting projections help to build an enticing, albeit idealised, picture – reminding me of what drew me to this degree and ultimately, rendering the year abroad a looming, exciting prospect for my future. But, as the time to depart gets closer and closer the reality and stress of the upcoming year was not only unexpected to me, it was anxiety-inducing.

As the pressure mounts to figure out my exact plans for my year abroad my anxieties are gradually overwhelming the excitement and hope I previously felt. When I took a moment to unpack the nature of my apprehension, I quickly realised that it is multi-faceted – the stress revolves around not only where I will end up, but what I am leaving behind, and the uncertainty of what I am coming back to. As the faculty emails mount reminding us that the time to leave is getting closer and we need to start finalising our plans, the idealisation has mostly disappeared and what I am left with is what feels like an overwhelming logistical nightmare, and the weight of a mountain of opportunities. The beauty and, as I am discovering, the pressure of the year abroad is that you can really do what you want and go wherever you want (as long as they speak the language you study) – in fact, the possibilities are vast and thrilling. This freedom was one that I used to rave about – but the pressure to make the ‘right’ choice, the choice that would mean I could truly make the most of my year abroad – one that I am so lucky to get the chance to embark on – feels more and more suffocating. The accompanying voices and opinions from the people who care: tutors, family members, people who want you to have the best year abroad possible, can unexpectedly add to this mounting internal pressure to make the right choices which respect everyone’s opinion. On top of this comes the logistical stress – all of a sudden, the curtain falls on the romanticised view of the year abroad as emails come flooding in about funding, tutors start asking about accommodation and internship arrangements and I realise that I have absolutely no idea how to plan a move abroad. How do I fund it? How do I find somewhere to live? Which is the best arrondissement to live in? The questions become endless and I put off planning in order to avoid accepting that I am out of my depth. Deep down, what I really want is to overcome the feelings of dread and regain the excitement that the prospect of an entire year spent abroad used to bring me.

Beyond the stress of ‘where will I end up?’, what often looms larger is the anxiety of what I am leaving behind. Unfortunately, as many Modern Linguists experience, many of my friends will have left Oxford on my return in fourth year – making Trinity term 2022 the term of many ‘lasts’. Although I am excited to spend what might be my best term yet amongst them, it will nonetheless be bittersweet knowing that when I come back from my year abroad, I will have to readapt once more to a familiar albeit different environment. Ultimately, at the core of my anxieties, is the idea of the unknown – in other words, a fear of not knowing what lies ahead. I need to convert that fear back into anticipation and find joy in the multitude of possibilities and experiences which lie ahead.

Image credit: Daria Shevtsova

Oxford declared Britain’s ‘Capital of Woke’ 

0

Oxfordshire has been proclaimed the UK’s most ‘right-on’ county.

In an attempt to shame Oxfordshire for its “drippy hippy” culture, ranging from gender-neutral toilets to vegan-only menus, the Daily Mail drew attention to the advances the council has made in improving the inclusivity and environmental friendliness of the county.

Prior to May last year, the Conservative party had held control of the Oxfordshire County Council since 1973. Since May, however, a new Lib Dem/Green/Labour alliance has introduced a number of reforms, from backing cycling schemes to introducing a ban on meat at council meetings.

Oxford is famously home to a number of outspoken Tories, from former Conservative Prime Minister David Cameron to the controversial Jeremy Clarkson. However, the Daily Mail argues that the Covid pandemic has sparked an “exodus of ‘right on’ Londoners rushing to buy second homes in rural counties like Oxfordshire”, leading to the “liberal elite” banging the “progressive drum” in this former “true blue” county.

Amongst the policies shunned by the Daily Mail are the Low Traffic Neighbourhood schemes, plans to implement a smoke-free policy in certain areas, and a motion to create a network of gender-neutral toilets.

The “woke” policies pursued by the Oxfordshire County Council have created divisions amongst councillors. One point of controversy was the decision to serve a meat-free platter to councillors at a recent meeting. Ian Middleton, a Green councillor, described the vegan spread as an “absolute triumph”, but Conservative councillor Liam Walker said that he and co-workers shunned this meal in favour of “a pint and pub grub”, according to the Daily Mail.

The meat ban has also drawn criticism from Diddly Squat farmer Jeremy Clarkson, who branded councillors as “swivel-eyed communists and drippy hippies”.

Another point of division has been the initiative to provide gender-inclusive toilets in council buildings and to work with healthcare providers to remove barriers to transgender and non-binary people. Sally Povolotsky, the Lib Dem councillor who proposed the plans, said: “This alliance believes it is only fair for all people to have the gender that reflects their lived reality on their documents, including non-binary and intersex people.”

She added that the motion was designed to amend a “lived reality of segregation” among the transgender community.

The leader of the Conservative opposition on the council, Eddie Reeves, criticised the plan to spend a large sum of the council budget on these reforms.

A further policy that has been criticised by the Daily Mail is the plan to reduce smoking areas throughout Oxfordshire. Ansaf Azhar, Oxfordshire’s public health director, described the policy as a “long game to change smoking culture”. It will see the creation of smoke free environments in the region.

The council aims to prevent deaths from tobacco-linked diseases and hopes to reduce the prevalence of women smoking at the time of delivery to below four percent by 2025. According to the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, one in five babies born to women who smokes at this time has low birth weight.

The Freedom Organisation for the Right to Enjoy Smoking Tobacco (FOREST) condemned the plans, saying it is “of no business of local councils if adults choose to smoke”.

Yet another Oxford Country Council proposal to have come under fire is the introduction of Low Traffic Neighbourhood schemes. The schemes block off certain areas of the county to prevent people from driving through those areas. What may have come as a relief to student cyclists (and the environment) has caused uproar amongst certain Oxfordshire motorists, prompting protests earlier this year. Likewise, the Oxford City Council has been criticised for its attempts to create a Zero-Emission Zone (ZEZ) in the centre of Oxford.

Duncan Enright, cabinet member for travel and development strategy, said the ZEZ was the “latest measure to clean up the air in our historic city centre”.

Likewise, Tim Dexter, campaigns manager for air quality for the charity Asthma + Lung UK, told the BBC that the implementation of ZEZs was a “watershed moment for tackling air pollution”.

However, some local business owners have expressed concerns about the plan, which would lead to many diesel and petrol vehicles facing a charge of £10 per day for driving through ZEZs, and the Daily Mail has condemned it as yet another policy on the “woke” agenda.

Images provided by Build Back Better UK – Oxford.

May Day celebrations to be held in person

0

Traditional May Morning celebrations are set to take place in person this year.

For the majority of Oxford Undergraduates, this will be their first experiences celebrating May Morning due to COVID restrictions over the past two years. The ceremony was held virtually in 2020 and 2021 – detracting from the spectacle of the fete.

To commence the celebration, large crowds traditionally gather outside of Magdalen College at 6am on 1st May to listen to the Magdalen College Choir. The tradition of singing of “Hymnus Eucharistus,” a 17thC Latin Hymn, dates back at least 500 years. The Magdalen Tower bells then continue to ring for 20 mins to mark the coming of spring.

The festivities allow for the Oxford community to come together and celebrate the event. Crowds customarily come dressed for the occasion, wearing spring costumes and garlands.  The group of around 150 Morris Men will then parade their way through town, right the way from Magdalen College to the Radcliffe Square. Folk music and dancing continues through until midday, with the whole community engaging in the dancing, singing, eating, and drinking.

Although official May Morning celebrations begin at 6am, the music and partying atmosphere commences on “May Eve,” for many students.  College balls or club nights continue into the early hours of the morning, where partygoers emerge from clubs in the morning to continue the celebrations.

Traditionally, pubs and cafes open at 5am to welcome students from the night before, or those up early enough to get a good position for the choir singing in front of Magdalen College Tower.

Although the modern tradition of jumping from Magdalen Bridge is now banned due to the shallow water, this by no means detracts from the fun. Students often opt for a dip in the River Cherwell as a way to “wake up” before the choir sings.

This unparalleled festivity is expected to be incredibly busy. In 2017, turnout reached 27,000 spectators. This year, May Morning falls on a Sunday, which offers the perfect occasion for partygoers and families alike to gather in Oxford city.

Oxford city council have set up a fundraiser for the celebrations. They have said that they are working to create opportunities for local artists, businesses, and residents to have more involvement in the event. Magdalen Bridge is set to be decorated with art from local artists and creative communities.

The Oxford council’s culture manager, Paula Redway said: “We want this year’s event to be extra special and we want to support Oxford’s artistic community.

“May Day is an occasion to lift the spirits and be joyful, so we’re raising funds to commission pieces showing Oxford’s hidden gems. They will then be displayed on Magdalen Bridge for May morning, and at future events.”

Dubbed one of the highlights of trinity term for students, May morning is set to be the most spectacular celebration in years. This 16th Century tradition is certainly not one to miss.

Image Credit: Romanempire/CC BY 2.5

Modern Languages students slam Year Abroad Office failings

0

Modern Languages students on their year abroad report feeling let down and abandoned by Oxford University’s Year Abroad Office. Students told Cherwell that the Year Abroad Office provided minimal mental health support, a lack of meaningful assistance for students from working-class backgrounds, and has repeatedly disseminated false information and guidance. In one case, University failings led to students being scammed when applying for health insurance cards.

The Year Abroad Office is part of the Faculty of Medieval and Modern Languages. It is the central body that coordinates year abroad arrangements for Modern Languages students going abroad in their second or third year. With different colleges providing varying levels of support to their students, many rely on the Year Abroad Office when moving abroad to work, study or teach. 

However, student testimonies heard by Cherwell have claimed that the Year Abroad Office is failing to provide adequate support to all of its students.

Third-year students currently on their year abroad feel that they were “unequipped” to travel abroad and “ill-informed” about the process. With the cancellation of the Year Abroad Health and Safety session in Trinity 2021, many students had attended only a singular hour-long presentation before embarking on their years abroad. One third-year student studying German commented that: “to send students out to their target countries with woefully inadequate levels of advice about […] the pathways available, and plainly amateur, even arrogant administration […] is simply unfair.” 

The student claimed that they were advised to “use their connections” to get a job abroad, a recommendation that they called “the clearest example of classism (inadvertent or not), that [they] have experienced in [their] time at Oxford”.  Another student felt that the Year Abroad Office “alienated working-class students” by failing to provide meaningful assistance to those looking for jobs abroad.

Once abroad, students reported a “lack of communication”, “lack of empathy” and inadequate “year-round support” from the Year Abroad Office, with several students expressing concern over the mental-health implications of such treatment. One third-year student studying French stated: “I have had no communication from anyone at uni checking that I am even on my year abroad and asking me if I am ok and alive. I think this is very poor from a welfare standpoint as I know that the university doesn’t even know where I am…I have felt completely abandoned by the university for the duration of my time abroad.” 

Where the Year Abroad Office has attempted to provide some assistance, students feel that their advice is at best unhelpful, and at worst, actively harmful. In Michaelmas 2021, for example, the Year Abroad Office provided students with a link to a scam website that charged £35 to order a fake GHIC insurance card (the post-Brexit replacement of the EHIC card). A third-year student studying French, who applied through this link, said: 

“I originally applied for the card through the link sent by the university and paid the £35 fee without thinking. Must be the right link if it’s recommended by the year abroad office, right? A few weeks later, I was told by another student that the GHIC should be free through the official website! Although uni did then refund this error, my application was then ‘lost’ by the official GHIC handlers […], 10 weeks later I got my card and could finally get the visa.” 

The Year Abroad Office triggered further administrative complications for students studying French planning to take up internships abroad. In August 2021, students who filled in the “Convention de Stage” form drawn up by the faculty found their applications to take up internships rejected by the French authorities because the form did not comply with the necessary French law.

These mistakes, according to the students affected, are symptomatic of the Year Abroad Office’s “failure to adapt to Brexit”, with students claiming that the University is still “unprepared for all of the corresponding bureaucracy” that is involved in post-Brexit year abroad arrangements. 

The Year Abroad Office is likely to face further challenges in the coming months, as the Russian invasion of Ukraine has created uncertainty for current first and second-year students studying Russian. Having flown home all of the current Year Abroad students in Russia, the Year Abroad Office must now decide on alternative arrangements for the upcoming cohorts.    

When approached by Cherwell, a representative from the YA provided a full statement: “To the best of our knowledge, that is not true. Students were only ever sent the links to the FCDO website, and we additionally obtained advice directly from the British Council. Guidance​ for each of the 27 different EU countries has changed, as has FCDO advice on Covid-related travel – but that does not mean the advice was incorrect. There was an administrative error where an incorrect link was sent. The website was not a scam, although charged a fee for faster processing of a free application. The link was corrected as soon as it came to light, and the students affected were reimbursed for the fee.” 

“That the Year Abroad Office provided a substandard template for the ‘Convention de Stage’ form that did not meet the necessary requirements of French law. A temporary template was made available to students almost immediately after the departure from the EU. However during the year, it came to light that there was additional wording required to meet the new legalities/Visa requirements for internships in France. 

“As set out before: the UK did not decide until the last moment on what basis it would conduct its relationship with the EU after 31 January 2020. The YA office was prepared and had repeatedly flagged to students that work travel would be affected, and that every EU country would make its own decisions on immigration because of the decisions the UK government had taken – so that the result of Brexit was to replace one set of immigration regulations with 27 different ones.”

“The MML Year Abroad offers flexibility to undertake a range of options and the Faculty endeavours to provide a range of information for all options. Student feedback has always been that students value the flexibility of YA arrangements, where individual students – in consultation with their tutors – can make arrangements which meet their academic needs and their career aspirations. All students receive a language-specific YA meeting, as well as a faculty-based session in Trinity Term and repeated emails, have access to a host of resources on work-placement and internships, but are advised that it is the responsibility of individual students to find work.  Students have access to a range of funding opportunities for the year abroad including: The continuation of their full means-tested Government maintenance support and Oxford Bursary or Crankstart Scholarships if eligible, Turing funding opportunities, Heath Harrison Scholarships, Year Abroad Travel Hardship Fund as well as College funding.”

“The YA provides a session in TT on how to cope with the YA and the challenges that it may pose (now called “YA orientation’ rather than ‘Myths and realities’), together with a set of resources on mental health and well-being. Students are advised to discuss mental health needs with their college and the faculty’s disability advisor. The YA officers have gone out of their way to support students who have found themselves in mental health difficulties.”

A University spokesperson told Cherwell: “The Year Abroad Office provides comprehensive support and information for all Modern Languages students, of whom there are around 300 annually, ahead of their year abroad and during it. This includes a session in the term before departure on coping with the year abroad and any challenges that may arise, resources on mental health and well-being, and faculty and college support throughout the year. All students receive advice and resources about work placements and internships for the year abroad, allowing students, in consultation with tutors, to find placements which meet their academic needs and career aspirations. Students also have access to a range of funding opportunities for the year abroad including continuation of University bursaries and scholarships,  Year Abroad Travel Hardship Fund, College funding and Turing funding, which offers higher levels of support for students from disadvantaged backgrounds. Information is regularly updated in line with official guidance, and communication to students has increased in recent years following Brexit and the international challenges of the pandemic and the war in the Ukraine.”

Image Credit: Mr Eugene Birchall / CC BY-SA 2.0 via Geograph

Jewish reading recommendations

CW: antisemitism, drug abuse, suicide

I had never heard of Joseph Roth. Or Arthur Schnitzler. Or Stefan Zweig. Or even Canetti if I’m honest. I had heard of Kafka of course – and I have always been enamoured with that sharp, folkloric, sinister quality that always seems to know more than you do. I think in some ways it is a distinctly Jewish quality in this period, the painfully sharpened perspective which comes from assimilation. It was only after seeing Stoppard’s Leopoldstadt that Austria – and its writers – became of interest to me from a Jewish heritage point of view. It was as though, when I encountered that play, the richness of Jewish life in Vienna before the war opened up to me in a way I had never imagined before – in a way I never imagined it would. When you walk into the theatre, you face a large screen of rapidly changing photographs of Jewish life in Vienna. Snapshots of people who look uncannily like people I know – who look just like me – but from before the war. The play follows the Merz family through the generations. It is Stoppard’s most intimate play, and at times, it is deeply haunting. But it is the characters, who are so full of life, that are more memorable than even the most painful parts of the play. I had never seen on the stage a family having a Pesach (Passover) meal at the table – let alone only a few scenes after they decorate a Christmas tree with a Star of David. Stoppard shows the joy and the anguish of being an assimilated Jew in a Christian country. 

I began to think about Vienna – and particularly, Vienna after World War One. I wanted to know what Jewish life was like, and I came across Stefan Zweig’s The World of Yesterday.  I had not read Zweig before, even though I have been assured that he was one of the most famous writers of his generation. After escaping the Holocaust, in 1942 he and his wife were found dead in South America, holding hands after having overdosed. The day before he had sent this final book to be published. 

To read Zweig’s memoirs is to enter into the golden world of Vienna before World War II. Every page is another street in Vienna, another meeting with Freud, Herzl, Schnitzler, Karl Kraus, and famous artists, writers, musicians. Beginning from his school days, the passion and desire to learn, to stay up to date with modern literature, was something I had never encountered before. Each page contains something funny and something tragic. Like Roth’s Radetzky March, it is clouded with the knowledge of what happens in the next chapter of Austrian history. We meet Herzl as the managing director of the Neue Freie Presse, and we see Herzl’s funeral through Zweig’s uncomprehending eyes:

people arrived… from all lands and countries; Western, Eastern, Russian, Turkish Jews… It was an endless procession… There was an almost raging turmoil; all order failed in the face of a kind of elemental, ecstatic grief. I have never seen anything like it at a funeral before or since. And I could tell for the first time from all this pain, rising in sudden great outbursts from the hearts of a crowd a million strong, how much passion and hope this one lonely man had brought into the world by the force of his ideas.”


Zweig – like many of the bourgeois Austrian Jews – was not a Zionist. He believed in Europeanism and internationalism, and called himself “a citizen of the world.” But what I realised, from reading Schnitzler’s The Road to the Open more than anything, was how modern Jewish identity questions – and their relation to Zionism – remained as distinctly difficult to deal with even then as they are now. The book is full of endless dialogues about being Jewish and assimilated. Characters visit Palestine with Herzl-inspired dreams, and return disillusioned and depressed. They pretend they aren’t Jewish. They pretend to be Jewish. The main character is a Christian aristocrat who spends all of his time feeling an outsider in his social circle of upper middle-class Jews amidst the pressures of rising antisemitism. It is people trying to live in a polarised society, a world where psychoanalysts, Zionists, Socialists coexist and try to understand their own world. It’s entertaining, extremely funny, and at times entirely bleak. Like Leopoldstadt, it is these expressions of Jewish life before the war – beset with jokes, neuroses, and anguish – which stay alive long after reading the texts. I would highly recommend.

Trinity Term expectations: Oxford at its finest?

0

‘So, what’s Trinity Term like?’ an unsuspecting fresher asks a second-year.

‘Ah, Trinity Term …’ the second-year replies, looking off longingly into the distance.

Trinity Term seems to have some sort of mythical status. Its mention in the presence of older years is met with sighs of yearning and assertions of how splendid it is. After the cold gloom of Hilary term and the months when darkness settled over the city at 4PM, I sure am looking forward to experiencing Oxford in all its sunny glory. When I first visited, it was mid-July, and summer was at its height. The city was magical – the yellow brick golden, the blue sky a marvellous backdrop to the RadCam. Soon, Oxford will transform once again into a city of gleaming spires.

As a Classicist, I am lucky enough, if you can put it that way, not to have to worry about Prelims until Hilary of second year. So, my aim for this Trinity, before the gruelling marathon of Mods kicks in, is to lap up every beam of Oxford sun that I possibly can. I will not be taking the pollen-filled, sweet-smelling summer air for granted.

My desire to spend as much time outdoors as possible, whether while studying or not, is heightened by the two years of lockdowns we have just emerged from. What better way to remedy this feeling of prolonged confinement than by frequenting the rolling fields of Port Meadow or Uni Parks? They promise us picnics in fields, swimming in the river, and, of course, punting. An Oxford rite of passage, many of us have been looking forward to going punting ever since we first received our offers. The question remains to be asked as to who will be the punter and who the puntee (I am most certainly the latter). As evening sets in, the pub can be swapped for a park of your choice – bring drinks, snacks, a speaker and a decent playlist and you’re set.

Something I and my fellow freshers are particularly excited about is Trinity’s promise of our first Oxford ball. Many colleges, such as Queen’s and Hertford, are hosting their black-tie ball this coming term, whilst ChristChurch, Trinity and New are set to stun with their white-tie commemoration balls. I am eager to see the colleges spruced up for this triennial affair, much as a ball does seem like an extra-massive, extra-fancy open-air BOP. I can already hear my friends’ groans at the dozens of disposable photos I will insist on taking – but what has to be done has to be done. The prospect of dressing up and spending the night in the sultry summer outdoors, drinking and eating and dancing to our heart’s content until dawn, is one that seems straight out of a fairytale. With, of course, the less romantic but equally entertaining addition of stumbling around at 6AM. Somerville-Jesus students are already preparing for their post-ball stagger over to Magdalen bridge for the May Morning choir performance.

The college quad was cordoned off during Hilary term to allow the grass to recover, but for Trinity it will be made accessible to students again (sticking to the boast that it is one of the only colleges to let its students walk on the grass). Might we be able to convince our tutors to let us have tutorials on the quad? Probably not, but, at any rate, we can “study” in groups on the grass, fulfilling our light academia fantasies. Picture perfect: book in hand, dappled sunlight over the page, bottle of lemonade (or perhaps pink gin) by our side. We will become the embodiment of tourist eye candy.

Clubbing in the summer will be a whole other experience to winter clubbing. It will be thrilling to walk back to our accommodation when we can catch the first glimpses of the new day’s sun skirting the horizon, albeit a little concerning for our 9AM lectures. And – this is the thing I’m most excited for – not having to use club cloakrooms. No more standing in endless queues to deposit our college puffers! No more college puffers at all, in fact. I am curious as to what everyone’s preferred item of stash will be for the summer months; Oxonians will hardly be able to go for long without donning some sort of college insignia. Bucket hats maybe? College polo shirts? We shall see what fashion choices the heat churns out.

There is of course everything sport and drama related to look forward to. A few of my friends and I have decided to commit to having a go at rowing, after two terms of reluctant delaying. The idea of falling into a lukewarm river on a moderately sunny day in May is heaps more appealing than having the same experience in the middle of Storm Eunice. Although there are more than a few people who have warned me off from rowing –  I still can’t tell if they were joking or not – it is something I feel compelled to try. The Oxford vs Cambridge Boat Race on Sunday, which saw a victory for the men’s Blues, has further whetted my appetite for rowing. Drama-wise, various student companies will be putting on a number of different productions, from musicals to traditional plays. Some will even be hosted in open-air theatres, which promises to be a real treat.

I might be romanticising Trinity Term slightly. Collections, the workload, and the general intensity of Oxford life will of course be as prevalent in Trinity as they were in Michaelmas and Hilary. Attending lectures in Exam Schools will involve both kinds of sweating. However, I do think that the warm days will bring with them a certain levity; as they say, the sun makes for a sunny disposition.

Image credit: Polina Tankilevitch

‘Beckett on speed’: In conversation with Nocturne Productions

Nocturne Productions is staging its first play, Jez Butterworth’s Mojo, at the Michael Pilch Studio in Week 3. We spoke to director Max Morgan, producer Jemima Chen, and actors Noah Radcliffe-Adams (Baby) and Emma Pollock (Sweets) about the upcoming show.

You’re a newly-formed production company. How did Nocturne come about?

Max: Jem[ima] and I vaguely knew each other before we came to Oxford and I knew she’d been producing things. A lot of the production companies are run by second years, so we thought why don’t we have a stab at forming our own, making the most of drama at Oxford and how accessible everything is. We set up the company at the start of last [Hilary] term, picking the play, and now we’re here.

Jemima: We’re really keen on Pinter, Beckett, Jez Butterworth. I was already doing [Pinter’s] The Dumb Waiter [A2 Productions, HT22], and we want to do more dark comedy.

Max: Hence ‘Nocturne’, because it’s kind of dark, but also has the element of musicality and melodiousness. We had this image of a piano with the black and white keys.

Jemima: There were a lot of names. We were almost called ‘Wheelbarrow’.

Could you summarise what Mojo is about and why you chose to adapt it?

Max: I was really attracted to it because it’s been described as ‘Beckett on speed’: a real pressure-cooker play that unfolds over the course of less than twenty-four hours on a Saturday night and early Sunday morning, after six Soho gangsters in 1958 have discovered that their club owner, of the Atlantic, has been cut in two. It’s about how they descend into paranoia, and carnage unfolds in a network of marvellously-layered backstabbing.

Jemima: Mojo’s such a stylistic play and we can really mess around with that. We’re making the set immersive, having the first row of seating converted into chairs and tables; we have a live drummer. He suggested having a dress code for opening night: a 50s-Soho-Kit Kat Club style theme.

Max: It’s been described as a combination of Tarantino, Pinter, and Mamet in its witty dialogue and absurd tropes. It’s the ultimate combination really.

The Stage team this term are trying to demystify Oxford drama. Could you tell us a bit about your experience, and any advice you might have for those wanting to start out?

Jemima: At school I mainly did acting. I didn’t do anything behind the scenes, but I always wanted to do the producer aspect, because it’s kind of an ‘unsung hero’ role. It started like that. You pick it up so, so quickly and you go from there!

Max: I got here and was so overwhelmed by the sheer quantity of stuff on the OUDS Facebook page. I just applied for everything manically, and managed to get involved acting in the Jesus College Shakespeare Project but also assistant directing in the first term. It was such an incredible experience, being in a rehearsal room with student actors and a student creative team, and I learnt a lot from it. Assistant directing roles and getting involved in productions is a really good way of getting to grips with how you want to take things a step further, and people really want to give you tips and share techniques. There’s a lot on offer.

It’s often sadly the case that actors are discouraged by not getting parts, or simply don’t audition. What has your experience been like?

Noah: It is quite nerve-wracking auditioning for anything. You are going to get nervous and that’s a good thing. I auditioned for a couple of Covid online things and didn’t get them and had some serious self-doubt. Then at the end of the year there was a [St Peter’s] play on, and I got involved in that. That gave me a lot of confidence to just go for stuff. From the outside looking in, it does look quite exclusive. I felt like that. I think there is a certain element of getting your foot in the door. I couldn’t recommend enough going for as many things as possible and not being discouraged. I’d really recommend going for a college play.

Emma: The radio plays and Covid plays didn’t appeal to me at all. I hadn’t met anyone, it was absolutely terrifying. I came into second year having not done anything and just thought OK, I’ll put myself out there for as many things as possible. And the more you do things, the more you meet people, so the more you’re going to get things. To put yourself out there you really have to put yourself out there. And advertise that it’s your first time. OUDS is encouraging first-time actors, so that’s a plus.

Noah: People just take a chance on you, instilling confidence within you. That means you’ll act way better. A more comfortable, inclusive environment gets the best out of people. That’s no secret, really.

Could you tell us what attracts you to your part in Mojo, and how it differs from roles you’ve played in the past?

Noah: The last two parts I’ve played have been quite surly, senior characters and I wanted to do something completely different. I love the juvenile vulnerability of Baby and I think he’s so unpredictable and volatile but at the same time so vulnerable. That’s really fun to act and creates a tense dynamic with the other characters, intensified by the claustrophobia of the Pilch.

Emma: There’s a hierarchy of characters in Mojo. We’re scared of Baby but we kind of adore him and worship him in a strange way. Sweets is quite a paranoid person, but also very funny. Some of the stuff he spouts is hilarious. He’s one of a comedy duo, Sweets and Potts. They’re always on pills, and that makes them even more paranoid. I like to think of it as if you inserted a child into this gang environment: quite scared, quite confused by the violence, obedient and worried about what’s going on. But children are strangely aware of what’s going on in a way that adults aren’t. A different perspective on things, in a naїve way.

Do you have a favourite line?

Max: I think Noah’s is pretty good.

Noah: Well, I don’t know how much it would mean in isolation, but ‘Kiss my pegs.’

Jemima: I was literally going to say that.

Max: ‘There’s nothing like someone cutting your dad in two for clearing the mind.’

Noah: ‘My piss is black.’ That’s a great line.

Jemima: I like the lawnmower. ‘Over the face with a lawnmower.’

What can we expect from Nocturne Productions in the future?

Max: Next year we’re hoping to do Making Noise Quietly by Robert Holman, which is a series of three vignettes, and get first-time crews involved as their first production. We’ll have a different team on each of the vignettes, and hopefully do it at the BT Studio, and get as many people involved as possible. It’s really important. Fingers crossed for new writing too.

Jemima: And some films!

Finally, in one word, why should we come and see Mojo?

Jemima: Cutlasses.

Max: Speed.

Noah: Drums.

Emma: Violence.

Mojo runs at the Michael Pilch Studio from 10th-13th May.

Image credit: Biba Jones (@bibasketches)

The Godfather and the Thrill of Cinema

0

CW: death, violence

With the 50th anniversary of the release of Francis Ford Coppola’s 1972 film The Godfather, many cinemas throughout Oxford — including Curzon, Phoenix Picturehouse, and The Ultimate Picture Palace — showed Parts I and II in their theatres to nearly sold-out audiences. The special showings have provided film enthusiasts the opportunity to see the classic films in theatres; for many it was the first time. The simple act of seeing a well-known film in cinemas — as opposed to watching it on a streaming service — has the potential to give the film another life and enables audiences to see it from a new perspective.

The Godfather is a controversial topic in popular culture. Ask two different people for their opinions on it and they will give wildly different answers. To fans, it is the beginning of a duology that can be considered two of the greatest films ever made. To others, it represents a class of film that people pretend to like; in reality, it’s boring, drawn-out, hard to follow, and — worst of all — overrated. Whatever your persuasion, The Godfather is undeniably an ambitious, well-made film with a vast cultural impact.

A film that rests so prominently in the public’s psyche can be difficult to watch subjectively. Audiences go into it with their own biases and expectations. In many ways, they have already formed their opinions before hearing “I believe in America” for the first time. 

And now to expose my own biases: The Godfather is one of my favourite films. It has been since I first watched it on TV at age seventeen. I was taking a film class in school and knew that I was supposed to love this film. I couldn’t entirely follow what was happening. Sometimes, I couldn’t even make out Marlon Brando’s breathy dialogue without turning up the TV speakers. But I loved it. The portrayal of crime-ridden 1940-50s New York with the film’s 1970s atmosphere made me dream of seeing it in a real cinema someday.

The 8.30 showing I attended at Phoenix Picturehouse was sold out. The theatre burst with every type of filmgoer: students, families, elderly couples, groups of friends who later discussed the film outside over cigarettes, young amorous couples who made out as people were murdered onscreen, and plenty of solo film enthusiasts like me. We all sat shoulder-to-shoulder, in a small movie theatre in 2022, to see this film from 1972.

The Godfather gripped the audience in rapt attention. Everyone held their breath as Jack Woltz followed the layer of blood in his bed to the severed head of his prize horse. Some leaned forward in their seats when Michael crept around the empty hospital trying to protect his father. Others audibly gasped when the car blew up (to avoid spoilers, I won’t say who was in the car). Everyone laughed when Clemenza made fun of Michael for not telling Kay he loves her over the phone while standing in a room full of mafiosi. The audience’s reactions, in the same vein as Cinema Paradiso, added to the viewing experience. There is something to be said for the fact that The Godfather could elicit these reactions.

The experience did not stop after the end credits. As I left the theatre, I heard different groups discussing the film on the pavement outside. One woman stated “I liked it” to her friends in an unsure tone. A man told his wife he didn’t remember it being so violent as they stood with their rather young-looking children. A student kept repeating the word “incredible” and shaking their head. A man talked about how this was his second time seeing it in cinemas that week.

Watching classic films in cinemas is somewhat of an attraction. It is, after all, viewing them in the manner they are meant to be viewed. There is a sense of nostalgia as well as a sense of reinvention. 

This viewing was like watching the film for the first time… again. I knew what was going to happen but I couldn’t wait to see how it played out. It was better than any previous time I watched the film at home. The rise of streaming services has changed how we watch films. As with many media innovations and changes, this is neither an inherently positive nor negative phenomenon. Streaming services have made film more accessible. People now have easier access to more films and more genres of films than they did before. However, the fact remains that we now watch them in drastically different ways than filmmakers originally intended. The screens are smaller and the ease of watching at home involves more distractions than a cinema. As I witnessed the reactions of the audience around me, I wondered if perhaps films are also meant to be seen in the company of others. It makes the comedic parts funnier, the suspenseful parts scarier, and the gruesome parts a little more bearable.

The Godfather certainly seemed different through the perspective of a cinema chair as opposed to my sofa. The violence on screen, while somewhat tame by today’s standards, was much more impactful and grotesque on the big screen of a cinema. Cinematographer Gordon Willis and Coppola’s brilliant use of lighting and colour was magnified. Deliberate choices related to composition and blocking were starker and more effective. Unlike my previous experiences watching the film, the dialogue was clear and captivating, demonstrating the brilliance of the script.

The Godfather’s mixed reputation remains when people see it in a cinema — I witnessed this first hand. However, experiencing the film in a noticeably different way — visually, audibly, and surrounded by an entranced audience — might just sway the opinion of those who deem it an overrated film. Seeing it on a large screen with its grainy old-school yet inventive visuals, one of the things that struck me the most was that The Godfather is gritty. It is authentic, raw, violent. There are editing mistakes. It is an imperfect film. But it is a masterpiece.

Perhaps the secret to ‘saving’ cinemas in the age of streaming services is to show more classic films and audience favourites in theatres. With the popularity of the showings of the Godfather movies and other series like The Ultimate Picture Palace’s “The World of Wong Kar-Wai,” there is no denying that seeing these films in theatres appeals to audiences. People, perhaps even unconsciously, want to experience them in their intended form. Watching a film on a laptop in bed is great, but going to the cinema to watch a classic film is, without a doubt, a worthwhile experience.

Father John Misty’s “new world of old characters”

0

CW: death, suicide

For the last two years, Josh Tillman has been on a well-deserved break. He had released a concept album about his own love life (2015’s I Love You Honeybear), tackled the grandiose issues of mankind’s flaws and the breakdown of his own marriage (2017’s Pure Comedy and 2018’s God’s Favourite Customer respectively), written for both Beyoncé and Lady Gaga, and parodically covered Ryan Adams covering Taylor Swift in the style of the Velvet Underground. In 2020 he released a live album for Covid relief, an EP of covers, and a pair of singles. Then he disappeared.

Having deleted Instagram and Twitter during the God’s Favourite Customer release cycle, the artist better known by his pseudonym Father John Misty only re-emerged in 2022 with the announcement of Chloë and the Next 20th Century and its lead single, Funny Girl. Its lush strings and titular reference to the Streisand film evoke an Old Hollywood feel that is mirrored throughout the album, while its lyrics introduce the listener to a celebrity stalker and Tillman’s trademark lyrical style. 

The opening track introduces the eponymous shoplifting socialist Chloë with 1920’s orchestral flourishes and and subsequently has her kill herself as the music fades out; “summer ended on the balcony / she put on Flight of the Valkyries / at her 31st birthday party / took a leap into the autumn leaves.” It sets the tone for an eclectic mix of tragic storytelling and showcases the wide array of instrumentation provided by an 11-piece orchestra and a string quartet. Production duties are immaculately handled by long-time collaborator Jonathan Wilson; the band sound polished as ever and the orchestral touches only add to the sense of grandeur created by the imaginative and evocative lyrics.

Goodbye Mr. Blue deals with a failed relationship briefly brought back together through the death of their shared cat (“that Turkish Angora’s ’bout the only thing left of me and you”), retaining the tragedy of 2018’s piano ballad Just Dumb Enough to Try over an instrumental homage to Harry Nillson’s Everybody’s Talkin’. The narrator’s sadness at his own misfortune is exacerbated by his wish for the rekindling of their love through the cat dying earlier; “maybe if he’d gone sooner / could’ve brought us back together last June.” 

Another track concerning this recurring juxtaposition of love and death is We Could Be Strangers, in which Tillman opines “you’ll lose the one sooner or later / just being who you are.” The ‘love’ between the couple in the song is shown as futile, the pair are shown to be car crash victims “bleeding on the freeway” and in yet another darkly comedic lyric the narrator takes relief in the fact that “I never wanted to disappoint you / at least I’ll never even get the chance to.” 

In Kiss Me (I Loved You), the piano opening mirrors that of 2015’s I Love You Honeybear, but contrasts that song’s dreamy proclamations of love with a desperate hope to restart yet another doomed relationship. “Our dream / endеd like dreams do” and “love is much less a mystery / than who you give it to” show his ever-increasing cynicism, but complement 2015’s mariachi-infused Holy Shit and its own declaration that “love is just an economy based on resource scarcity.” In this way, the song brings Honeybear full circle, all the way to the end of the relationship. The tremolo on the vocal enhances the dream-like qualities of the song, while David Lynch’s accompanying cover is sung in character as a capuchin monkey named Jack Cruz. 

Buddy’s Rendezvous asks “whatever happened to the girl I knew?” over the by-now familiar mix of piano, strings and light brushes of drums that fit perfectly on Lana Del Rey’s cover; her version of the song would not be out of place on Blue Banisters or Norman Fucking Rockwell. Olvidado (Otro Momento), is bossa nova sung in Spanish, inspired by a trip to Brazil and a conversation in the wrong language. The album concludes with The Next 20th Century, a 6 minute long Leonard Cohen-esque return to form and finishes with the thought that “I’ll take the love songs / if this century’s here to stay.” After 51 minutes of a beautiful ode to doomed love, we can only feel the same.

The album is a sprawling delight, full of morbid ends to inconclusive love stories. Entertainment Weekly’s Leah Greenblack argues that “they feel less like songs than Paul Thomas Anderson movies compressed to six minutes or less,” and it is clear that Tillman has achieved the Hollywood ambitions hinted at in his debut album. Contrasted with Pure Comedy, it is less modern, less timely and much, much less political, but it introduces sparkling new stories and songs to fill the void left by the lack of social commentary. In Chloë and the Next 20th Century, Tillman succeeds spectacularly at creating a new world out of old characters.

Image Credit: Paul Hudson/CC BY 2.0 via Wikimedia Commons

Oxford nightline is open 8pm-8am, every night during term-time, for anyone struggling to cope and provide a safe place to talk where calls are completely confidential. You can call them on 01865 270 270, or chat at oxfordnightline.org. You can also contact Samaritans 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, by calling 116 123 or emailing [email protected]