Thursday 28th August 2025
Blog Page 341

Jeremy Corbyn speaks on Cecil Rhodes, visions for Labour, and antisemitism in Labour at the Oxford Union

0

CW: Mentions of antisemitism and racism

Jeremy Corbyn addressed The Oxford Union this afternoon, speaking on a range of topics including the impact of COVID-19 on social equality, his time as Labour leader and his vision for the party, alongside addressing claims of antisemitism during his time in the party.

Mr Corybn was the leader of the Labour Party from 2015 to 2020 and has been an MP since 1983. Under his leadership, the party fought for the nationalisation of key industries including the national grid and broadband, more ambitious net-zero targets, and a second referendum. Mr Corbyn was also criticised for what the EHRC described as a culture within the party that “did not do enough to prevent anti-Semitism [sic] and, at worst, could be seen to accept it.” Mr Corbyn was suspended from the party over remarks made in response to the EHRC report, although he has since been reinstated as an independent MP. 

Speaking to Cherwell regarding the Oriel College Governing Body’s decision to not remove the Cecil Rhodes statue, despite the recommendations of the Oriel College Commission, Corbyn argued that contextualisation should be the most significant priority.  “I think [statues] are important as symbols. But what’s more important is the teaching of history, and how we have an understanding of colonialism. And Cecil Rhodes was racist, he subjugated and killed large numbers of people in what became Rhodesia and eventually Zimbabwe and Zambia, and made a great deal of money out of diamond mining and others in South Africa. And I don’t see a need to venerate his life at all.”

When asked about whether youth have influence in current politics by Cherwell, Corbyn nodded, stating that “The power’s in our own hands. See these hands? [gesturing towards his own]. That’s where the power lies, organise yourselves together. You don’t have to wait for somebody else. Just do it.” 

In response to a question from Cherwell on the role of the University of Oxford in a more equal society in the future, Mr Corbyn stated that “I would like to see a fairer form of intake,” and “a greater opening up of Oxford as a whole.” He also addressed the role of fees, both for international and home students, as a deterrent in applying to University. He encouraged the adoption of the approach taken by the University of Glasgow, whereby they assessed the financial gains they had made from slavery.

The event began with a speech from Corbyn on “inequality in society today.” He began by addressing two previous appearances at the Union; one a debate on the “future of the Labour party,” where proposed amendments to the Labour constitution were debated, and one on socialism with Conservative MP John Redwood.

Corbyn went on to argue that “coronavirus has left a massive inequality in society” and the impact of Brexit on Britain. “Inequality in our own society is getting worse and worse, year on year.”  He also argued for his own version of patriotism: “My patriotism is about supporting all of my fellow citizens.”

He then urged for further action on the climate crisis, including adopting a net-green by 2030 policy and the green industrial revolution that he proposed in his 2019 manifesto. He also criticised refugee policy under current Home Secretary Priti Patel, stating that “I am here to say that human beings are at risk, and human rights are at risk, by the way that we treat refugees.” Corbyn moved on to speak about racism in the US and the UK, encouraging “a real debate of what colonialism was and what colonialism did” alongside considering “who benefited in this country.” 

He finished his speech by arguing that “my determination was that Labour would be transformed into a community-led activist organisation,” stating that he wants “the party to continue to move in that direction” and arguing that “If we’re going to move away [from that] … then let there be a proper debate about it.” He finished by stating that “I want to build a world that’s fit for the next generation,” and condemning antisemitism, islamophobia, and racism in all forms.

The speech was followed by a question and answer session with current Oxford Union president, Adam Roble, and audience questions. Roble first asked Mr Corbyn to reflect on his time as leader of the opposition, to which Mr Corbyn stated that “leading a party is a very frustrating job,” and that he wanted to change policies by democratic means within the party. He cited his biggest regrets during his time as leader as the 2017 loss of the general election, and his inability to bridge the Brexit divide during the 2019 election.

Roble then went on to ask about the accusations of antisemitism that plagued Mr Corbyn during his time as leader. Mr Corbyn argued for the importance of Jewish Labour, stating that they played a founding role in the party, and spoke on the Chakrabati inquiry into antisemitism in the party which he argued came to many of the same conclusions as the EHRC report. 

When asked by Roble how he would respond to claims that he didn’t do enough to address antisemitism in the party in his time as leader, he said that he couldn’t speak for the beliefs of other people, but argued that he dedicated his career to fighting racism, stating that  “I will die fighting racism in any form.” Mr Corbyn made similar comments in response to the EHRC report when it was initially released. 

In audience questions at the end of the event, Mr Corbyn stated that he supports the empowerment of people that have suffered the consequences of colonialism, and also spoke on the Israel-Palestine conflict, which he spoke further on at a protest in Oxford on Sunday. He argued that of the conflict, “you have to recognise what the source of the problem is – the occupation.” He also suggested that many Israeli citizens would like to see the end of the Palestinian occupation. In response to a question from a teacher in the audience, he argued that necessary reforms include the adoption of free school meals for all in primary schools, and a loosening of the restraints of the secondary school curriculum.

Image Credit: Sasha Mills

Oxford sees the reopening of indoor hospitality and spaces

0

Oxford has seen the reopening of indoor bars and restaurants in line with the relaxation of government restrictions. Groups of six are now allowed to mix indoors, following the government’s roadmap out of lockdown.

One Oxford student enjoying cocktails at Freud, a bar in Jericho, said: “I feel like I have never been away. It was nice to have normality back and I feel like we’re on our way back to normal life. I enjoyed being warm inside rather than cold outside. It really makes you appreciate what we once considered normal!”

A spokesperson for Freud, which had previously opened outdoors, said: “We are really excited to have reopened the doors of Freud and it’s been incredible to see so many of our customers returning after our six-month hiatus! We took the opportunity to refresh Freud, opening new spaces, and can’t wait to be back in full swing and see everyone again.”

Similarly, the Oxford Union bar has opened indoors. They are “really pleased to be able to open up our Members bar, which has a great atmosphere already! We’re serving a wide range of drinks not to mention our homemade lunch menu daily from 11:30 to 2:30. We’ve also opened up the Goodman Library as an extension of the bar, so have more indoor bar capacity than we ever had before lockdown – we hope to see you there!” 

As well as indoor hospitality, indoor exercise classes have restarted. A spokesperson for Oxford City Council said “bringing indoor group exercise back is a really positive step for people’s wellbeing and for our leisure industry.”

“Our leisure centres are in the heart of our residential areas, providing great value for communities, and we’re looking forward to the buzz next week when group exercise is back on the timetable.” 

Image credit: Flora Dyson

BREAKING: Oriel College will not remove Rhodes statue after commission’s recommendations

0

Oriel College’s Governing Body has responded following the results of an independent commission which were revealed by The Guardian last night, choosing not to remove the statue of Cecil Rhodes. The commission advised that the statue was removed alongside a plaque on King Edward Street which features a portrait of Rhodes. They also urged the College to publish a statement that definitively detailed the extent and nature of their association with Rhodes and his legacy.

Oriel College’s statement explained: “The Commission backed the College’s original wish (made in June 2020 and reaffirmed again by the College yesterday), to remove the statue, whilst acknowledging the complex challenges and costs presented by its removal in terms of heritage and planning consent. The Governing Body has carefully considered the regulatory and financial challenges, including the expected time frame for removal, which could run into years with no certainty of outcome, together with the total cost of removal.”

“In light of the considerable obstacles to removal, Oriel’s Governing Body has decided not to begin the legal process for relocation of the memorials. Instead, it is determined to focus its time and resources on delivering the report’s recommendations around the contextualisation of the College’s relationship with Rhodes, as well as improving educational equality, diversity and inclusion amongst its student cohort and academic community.”

Further regarding the statue, they continued: “the Commission’s report also acknowledged the considerable planning and heritage considerations involved in the removal of the statue which is situated on the College’s Grade II* listed High Street building. Removal of the statue would be subject to legal and planning processes involving the City Council, Historic England and the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government.”

“The Commission noted that any application for planning permission to remove the memorials is not only likely to face considerable costs, but also complex challenges in the planning process, particularly since the Government’s policy, in relation to historic statues and sites which have become contested, is to ‘retain and explain’ them.

“However, the Governing Body recognised the need for a lasting and visible contextualisation of the Rhodes’ legacy, memorials and historical association with the College.”

Rather than removing the statue, they have agreed to establish a task force to consider the recommendations for the contextualisation of the Rhodes statue within the commission’s report (along with other suggestions) and to oversee their implementation. They will also commission a virtual exhibition to provide “an arena for contextualisation and explanation of the Rhodes legacy and related issues of relevance to the College’s objectives”. Furthermore, they plan to contextualise the Rhodes legacy and memorials in both their physical and virtual formats.

Lord Mendoza, Provost of Oriel College said: “My sincere thanks go to the Chair, Carole Souter and the expert Commission members for delivering an extensive, rigorous and considered academic body of work. It has enabled the College to achieve a productive resolution to a complex series of issues, and most importantly, we can now set-out deliverable measures that can demonstrably improve the educational equality, diversity and inclusion of the College and its community.”

“It has been a careful, finely balanced debate and we are fully aware of the impact our decision is likely to have in the UK and further afield. We understand this nuanced conclusion will be disappointing to some, but we are now focused on the delivery of practical actions aimed at improving outreach and the day-to-day experience of BME students. We are looking forward to working with Oxford City Council on a range of options for contextualisation.”

The commission also recommended that the College fund fellowships in fields related to addressing Rhodes’ legacy, alongside lectures and new outreach initiatives addressing race and colonialism. The report called upon the College to encourage applications from BAME backgrounds. On these, the College responded that the Governing Body has agreed to “create the office of Tutor for Equality, Diversity and Inclusion who will be a Fellow and Trustee of the College, develop a strategic plan for improving educational equality, diversity and inclusion, ensuring it is embedded more formally in the College, fundraise for scholarships to support students from Southern Africa, enact a 2016 decision to have an annual lecture on a topic related to the Rhodes legacy, race, or colonialism, institute an annual student prize (e.g. for an essay, artwork or photography) on a topic related to Rhodes legacy, race, or colonialism, provide additional training for academic and non-academic staff in race awareness, [and] introduce further outreach initiatives targeted at BME student recruitment”.

Oriel College noted: “the funds equivalent to that remaining in the Rhodes legacy will be used to help resource these initiatives”. They continued that “Oriel College has already undertaken a number of initiatives aimed at improving equality and diversity, including a one-off College scholarship for a postgraduate student from Africa, and a yearly donation to the Target Oxbridge programme, which aims to increase the chances of students of Black African and Caribbean heritage, and students of mixed race, getting into the Universities of Oxford or Cambridge.”

“Oriel’s admissions for UK-domiciled BME undergraduates are slightly above the University average (21.5% compared with 21.4% in the three years between 2018 and 2020) and that for students with black African and Caribbean heritage, it is also slightly higher during the same period (3.9% compared with 3.2%).”

The commission’s decision was originally planned to be released in January but was delayed due to the pandemic, along with a “considerable volume of submissions” and their desire to “consider all submissions carefully”. According to Oriel College, the commission “received and reviewed well over a thousand written contributions from students, alumni, associates of the college and the general public. A majority of the submissions to the Commission backed the retention of the statue.

Rhodes Must Fall has been contacted for comment.

Image Credit: alf~commonswiki / CC-BY-SA 3.0

BREAKING: Rhodes should fall, commission concludes

0

An independent commission established to discuss whether a controversial statue of the imperialist Cecil Rhodes should remain above the entrance to Oriel College has reached its conclusion. Their recommendation is that the statue, which has been a focal point for anti-racist activists, should be removed.

The commission’s decision was supposed to be released in January, but was delayed due to the pandemic and a “considerable volume of submissions”.

In a report seen by The Guardian, the commission advised that the College not only removes the statue, but a plaque featuring a portrait of Rhodes on King Edward Street. It also urged the College to publish a statement definitively detailing its association with Rhodes and his legacy.

Furthermore, the commission unanimously recommended that the College funds two new fellowships in fields related to addressing Rhodes’ legacy. It has been recommended that the college establishes new scholarships for students from southern Africa, and graduate students undertaking research in “relevant fields”. They have also recommended that the College holds an annual lecture addressing Rhodes’ legacy, and establishes new outreach initiatives addressing race and colonialism.

The report also called upon the governing body of Oriel College to encourage applications from students from BAME backgrounds, and to improve their offer and acceptance rates.

The commission’s recommendations are advisory. The final decision about whether the statue will be removed lies with the Oriel College governing body.

The commission follows a long campaign by activists to remove the statue, which has become symbolic of a greater reckoning with Britain’s imperial past. According to The Guardian, over 70 statues of colonialists, slave traders and similarly controversial figures have been removed since the murder of George Floyd in America by a white policeman sparked global Black Lives Matter protests.

Oriel College, Rhodes Must Fall Oxford, and The University of Oxford have been approached for comment.

Image: Howard Stanbury/CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 via flickr.com

Hundreds attend pro-Palestine march in Oxford, including ex-Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn

Hundreds of protestors attended a pro-Palestine march through Oxford on Sunday, including ex-Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, who addressed the crowd at Bonn Square towards the end of the demonstration. This was preceded by a smaller demonstration attended by dozens outside the Radcliffe Camera on Saturday. Protestors shouted “free, free Palestine” and “from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free” amongst other chants. The demonstration followed a week of conflict between the Israeli government and groups in Gaza, with at least 215 people killed in Gaza so far. 

A leader at the march speaking in Cowley, where the demonstration began. Image Credit: Sasha Mills

Standing in front of the cenotaph, Mr Corbyn applauded the “young people taking initiative” in setting up the protest. He also addressed the recent destruction of a media building in Gaza housing the Associated Press and Al Jazeera as well as other companies and private flats. “It is utterly disgraceful. […] Having seen those buildings, and met people inside them, including the Gaza mental health campaign, I could just appreciate what they are going through.”

“I have a very big question for our Prime Minister and our government. What, exactly, is the nature of Britain’s military cooperation with Israel? […] Of the weaponry that we [Britain] have supplied to Israel in the past: is that being used to kill children in Gaza and the West Bank? Our first demand here today is to stop all arms supplies to Israel.”

A student hangs a top emblazoned with ‘Free Palestine’ from his window at Magdalen College, as protesters pass by. Image Credit: Sasha Mills

Mr Corbyn ended his speech by encouraging unity in the response to the Israel-Palestine conflict. “The message here from Oxford today is: stop the bombing, save the lives, recognise Palestine, and stand with the Palestinian people. We’re united in that. We’re united in that across all faiths […] and across a wide range of political opinion. This is a matter of a moment of unity, of all peoples, be their Muslim, Jewish, Christian, Hindu, or anything else, to say that ‘We stand with the Palestinian people.’” 

Mr Corbyn prior to making his speech. Image Credit: Sasha Mills

Speaking to Cherwell after the protest, Mr Corbyn said “There have been protests in every city and indeed [Oxford] are holding theirs today. I was in London yesterday, so I was very happy to come this afternoon.” He went on to say that he thought the protest was “fantastic, respectful, very interesting, very interesting and very interesting speakers, very impressive. I’m very pleased to have been able to join.”

Mr Corbyn has previously received criticism and was suspended from the party in 2020 after the Equality and Human Rights Commission identified failures in the handling of antisemitism complaints. After its publication, he stated that he did not accept all of the report’s findings, although he caveated that “anyone claiming there is no anti-Semitism [sic] in the Labour Party is wrong.” The suspension was due not to the findings of the report, but Mr Corbyn’s comments. He has since been reinstated as an MP. 

When questioned by Cherwell about the impact of his history in the Labour Party on perceptions of his appearance at the march, Mr Corbyn denied that the enquiry had left him with “baggage” concerning antisemitism. “I made it very clear in my speech that whatever one’s faith one could and should condemn the Israel government’s behaviour in Gaza and the West Bank,” he said.

Protesters reach the High Street. Image Credit: Sasha Mills

David Williams, a former Green Party Parliamentary candidate also spoke at the march. Williams described the Nuremberg Act, a series of antisemitic and racist laws passed in Nazi Germany, as “blue copy” for the Israeli Citizenship Act, stating to the audience that “It’s exactly the same.” The IHRA definition of antisemitism, adopted by The University of Oxford and Cherwell, states that “drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis” is an example of antisemitism. In further correspondence to The Oxford Blue, Williams criticised the IHRA statement of antisemitism. Help the World Oxford, a group involved in organising the demonstration, told The Oxford Blue that Williams had not been invited to speak

Leah Mitchell, a Cherwell columnist, told The Oxford Blue that “the comparison is simply inaccurate. Israel’s citizenship act may be legitimately criticised as unfair and discriminatory along lines of ethnic identity, but it simply is not the same as, or equivalent to, the Nuremberg Laws.”

She went on to say that “It is also not a coincidence that it is always Nazi analogies for which people such as David Williams reach, rather than comparisons to any other oppressive force. These analogies are calculated to hurt Jews the most, by bringing to the surface our collective trauma and then flipping it on its head.”

A leader at the protest, on the Cenotaph. Image Credit: Sasha Mills

Other speakers included the assistant general secretary of Unison, the UK’s largest trade union. He spoke on the right of Palestinian children to dream “like the rest of us. Children who should dream of being a nurse, children who should dream of being a doctor. […] A child who should dream of being the person who solves COVID-19. […] Why shouldn’t that child be Palestinian?” 

Alongside several other political groups, official representatives of the Green Party were present at the march. Speaking to Cherwell, Chris Jarvis, councillor for the St. Mary’s Ward said: “The Green Party has always been of the view that we need to solve world conflicts and that international peace is a huge part of our political program.”

“The situation in Palestine is that you have a clear injustice going on where the Israeli state is illegally occupying Palestinian land. We want to see and end to that conflict, and we want to see a Palestinian state. What we’ve seen over the last few weeks is the escalation of that conflict, and the escalation of occupation. So we’re really proud to be standing as the Green Party against the illegal occupation of Palestine.”

He went on to say that the Green Party “want to see an end to all arms sales to Israel, because it’s facilitating the brutalisation of the Palestinian people.”

The Palestinian flag flown in the rain at Saturday’s protest. Image Credit: Sasha Mills

Dozens of protesters attended a smaller demonstration on Saturday 15th March in Radcliffe Square. Protesters staged a ‘die in’, where they knelt in the rain for seven minutes and three seconds in recognition of the 73 years since the Nakba.

Translating into English as “the catastrophe”, the Nakba was the expulsion of up to 750,000 Palestinians from the state of Israel after its establishment in 1948. Today, over 5 million Palestinians, including the descendents of those expelled during the Nakba, live as refugees, predominantly in neighbouring countries such as Jordan and Lebanon. The right of return is a key demand of many campaigners.

Amongst the speakers at the Saturday demonstration was Darin, a Palestinian graduate student at St Edmund’s Hall who is originally from the West Bank. “A year ago, when I was accepted to Oxford, I applied for my student visa to come to England. With the restrictions of movement Israel imposes on Palestinians, I could not reach Jerusalem, fifteen minutes away from my house. I could not cross the checkpoint or the separation wall. Instead I took a longer, more dangerous route and put myself at risk in order to be able to be here. Many other scholars couldn’t make it. Why? Because they are Palestinian”, she said in her speech

A sign held at Saturday’s demonstration. Image Credit: Sasha Mills

Speaking to Cherwell after the demonstration, Darin spoke about the toll the escalating conflict had taken on her. “I have my family in the West Bank: my parents and my siblings. And I do have friends in Gaza. Every morning I stay up until 4:00 checking on them, making sure they are alright. Also, many other Palestinian influencers have been posting very heartbreaking stories on social media: mothers putting their kids in their beds so if they die, they die together. When you’re living abroad and see all these attacks against your people you want to be there all the time. But at the same time, you’re focusing on what you’re doing here. So we’re trying to give solidarity to the people in Palestine.”

Oxfordshire Green Party has been contacted for comment. 

Image Credit: Sasha Mills

Haute Kosher: Love (of Jewish holidays) in the time of Covid

The first national lockdown in the UK began on 23rd March 2020, less than two weeks after many Jews had been celebrating the festival of Purim. Little did any of us know at the time that this would be the last holiday celebrated under normal circumstances for over a year. Throughout the remainder of 2020 and well into 2021, on important occasions and holidays we would be calling family and friends over Zoom, battling the combined chaos of lagging wifi and the natural dispensation of large groups of Jews all to talk at once, in an attempt to preserve some semblance of the normal calendar year. 

Holidays are the punctuation of our lives; they come around every year with comforting regularity, providing an opportunity for rest, reflection, and celebration. Our experience of Jewish holidays since the pandemic arrived may not have been quite the same as usual, but nonetheless amid the grinding monotony of Covid-era life they have functioned as small pockets of joy. Holding on to joy during bleak times is something which Jews have more or less become experts at over the millennia, and so it felt important to uphold that tradition. With the indispensable (and quintessentially Jewish) aid of vast quantities of carbohydrates, I’d like to think we’ve done a pretty good job.

Leah- Purim

Hammantash

The pandemic for me marked the beginning of my starting to pay attention to Jewish holidays outside of Passover and Hanukkah, the basic staples of many lax Jews’ calendar. As the world started to fall apart, I instinctively reached to pull the threads tying myself to my ancestors and my community tighter. This was no doubt reinforced by the sudden death of my grandma immediately prior to the pandemic hitting the UK; before I knew of a single person who had contracted Covid, my experience of 2020 was clouded by profound loss. On some subconscious level, I could not countenance that loss also representing a loss of my history and culture; of all the stories and the struggles that my grandma carried within her slight frame and her big heart.

My grandma and my mother, in accordance with the proud tradition of Jewish women, have always expressed love through food. As children, when we visited her home in Michigan, we used to call her “Kitchen Grandma” – a highly literal descriptor of her propensity for hovering around with plates of food and snacks at the ready. Therefore, even though I had never made hamantaschen or challah before, the process felt instinctively right as a means of processing grief and reconnecting with my family roots, the cornerstone of my identity. 

I was particularly delighted to learn that hamantaschen, the triangular filled cookies eaten by Ashkenazi Jews at Purim, are believed by many Jews to symbolise the ears of Haman: the villain of the Book of Esther who sought to commit genocide against the Persian Jews. Nothing better sums up the unofficial motto of Jewish holidays: “They tried to kill us, we survived, let’s eat”. It is a reminder of the eternal resilience of the Jewish people, so long as, like the heroine Esther, we maintain the courage to speak up for ourselves. Besides, who wouldn’t enjoy the dramatic flair of celebrating survival by eating the (symbolic) ears of one’s enemies? 

Pleasingly, making both hamantaschen and challah involved working with dough, the most emotionally satisfying of ingredients; its soft squidge under the fingertips cannot fail to reassure and to remind us that everything will be alright. Living in a pandemic is weird. Celebrating Jewish holidays for the first time during a pandemic is weirder. But the dough worked its magic; everything turned out more or less alright.

Tamzin – Shavuot

Home-made cheesecake

Shavuot, the Festival of Weeks, was last week. The timing could not have been more apt, as it marks the end of the period of 49 days after Pesach, a traditionally solemn time for the Jewish people, as marriages and ceremonies tend to be forbidden as we prepare to receive the Torah. Like the 17th May date for many of us, it marked the conclusion of a pretty long period without legally permitted parties. It is a joyous occasion where people join together to celebrate once again – and I personally ate a lot of cheesecake in the process. 

When I was younger, all I knew about Shavuot was that it in some capacity involved my mother’s very delicious cheesecake. Last year, for some bizarre reason, creating the perfect cheesecake seemed more important than ever… and now we are already preparing for next week’s iteration too. I participated in a Zoom where we tried to produce some cheesecakes for the festival online together in our separate kitchens, and although it was a rather dysfunctional gathering – it resulted in one of most delicious cheesecakes we had ever produced. 

I actually went around delivering parts of the cheesecake to local family and friends on those daily state-permitted walks we all remember so well. It brought the family together through our screens – those delicious, rich, creamy layers shared together amidst discordant sounds of people telling one another to “unmute” or to “go easy on the crust”. 

Cheesecake is meant to be very sweet, representative of the milk and honey of the Promised Land. I wondered why I hadn’t ever really celebrated Shavuot before (other than eating cheesecake) and I believe this is because of the lack of real ritual involved in Shavuot, especially in comparison to other festivals like Pesach. As Rabbi Ismar Shorsch describes in an article, Shavuot is “ritually bereft” with “no absorbing home ritual that might unite family and friends in preparation and observance.” 

So why do I find it exciting? What are we remembering? The festival commemorates the anniversary of the Jewish people receiving the Torah – a crucial unifying event for the Jewish people. There is definitely something exciting in the depiction of a group of people, encamped at the foot of Mount Sinai, anticipating the Torah together. It is exciting that many Jews celebrate by staying up all night on Erev Shavuot to study the Torah, in Tikkun Leyl Shavuot. I can imagine that a slice of cheesecake the following day has much the same restorative effects as a hot chocolate the morning after pulling an all-nighter for an essay crisis. As we *hopefully* return to studying in person in groups at university, I am sure we will appreciate how much learning together, and celebrating together, makes a huge difference to our experience as individuals.

We join together to share in something sweet, to celebrate Shavuot together. The collaborative, unifying emphasis of this festival seemed more crucial to me in the context of the pandemic than ever before. We can celebrate and learn together after a pretty bleak period. It is the togetherness, the sense of a community beyond the screens, all sharing cheesecake that really excites me. 

Naomi – Passover

Seder Leader Skog

During the pandemic I have remained in Oxford for health and academic reasons and thus have been here solidly since January. This has meant that I have been away from my home over Pesach for the first time in my life. When I was younger my family and I used to travel to America every year to celebrate Pesach with my extended American family. I have vague memories of mega-synagogues and the most dramatic hunt for the afikomen I have ever been involved in. From my recollection of this defining moment for my seven-year-old self, we were all in a very large building with many rooms and the afikomen was hidden somewhere. There was a group of many children who were competing and I distinctly remember it being treated as a high-stakes competition in which we were told to begin searching as if it were a race. I didn’t find the afikomen but received a $2 consolation prize.

Aside from this dramatic highlight, the majority of my Pesach experiences have been at home in Aberdeen with my family. It’s fairly standard; we follow the Haggadah and eat matzah ball soup. The family Haggadahs that we have are uniquely entertaining though as they are my grandma’s old ones from the 1950s and so are predictably dodgy by modern politically correct standards. During the period around Pesach my mum hoards boxes of matzah and hides them from my brother as he would eat all the boxes at once if he could. My family are very big matzah fans. One of the setbacks of living in Aberdeen is that we can’t access specialised kosher food like people who live in large Jewish communities can and so we shamefully make do with the ‘not kosher for passover’ matzah available at our local Sainsbury’s.

This Pesach was unique in two ways. Firstly, I had to host it for the first time and realised I was so used to following the ceremony as someone else leads that I had never actually paid attention to the order in which things occurred, prompting a panicked text to my mum a few days before the Seder. It was very fortunate that Oxford JSoc offered free Seder kits to those in Oxford, allowing me to not worry about getting food items together. The second way in which this Seder was different from others was that I was only with my girlfriend for it rather than a larger group. This ended up being very advantageous as it meant the free JSoc food was enough for both of us. 

The Seder itself was very standard. We laid the table in the official way and followed the Haggadah successfully. Our Seder leader, Skog, was highly successful in his role and while Elijah did not choose to drink from our offering, I’m sure he appreciated that it was poured in an Oxford Union shot glass. For the first time in my memory, the matzah I had was actually ‘kosher for passover’ although disappointingly I could not taste the difference; it appears certification from the Chief Rabbinate of Jerusalem does not add flavour. However, while indistinguishable from its imposter counterpart, in taste it did prove to be a very successful afikomen for my girlfriend -as despite my extreme efforts to disguise its hiding place she found it in under a minute.

I’ll be honest, I’ve never actually considered the meaning of Pesach. In my mind it has always just been ‘that one where you eat matzah ball soup, ask the four questions, and hunt down the hidden matzah for money’. This has not been aided by my total lack of Hebrew knowledge. I can truly state that I have never understood a single word spoken at synagogue. To many Jews, Pesach serves as the story of our perpetual persecution and eventual liberation, amplified by the saying ‘next year in Jerusalem’. This obviously today holds connotations of the modern state of Israel and so it may sound like an odd thing to toast – surely we can just get on a plane and go to Jerusalem like so many tourists do? However, historically and today this has held a more figurative meaning. ‘Jerusalem’ has been a metaphor for a place where we can be safe in a world without our persecution whatever that may mean. It is a symbol of resilience; no matter what we endure we always carry on with the hope that next year we will reach this ‘Jerusalem’. 

Pesach is fundamentally a celebration of our survival. We celebrate our liberation from slavery in Egypt by eating a meal where we do things like eat salty parsley to remind us of the shed tears of our people (I know, dramatic) while also reclining and drinking wine. The resounding message is clear: ‘in every generation there is a new Pharaoh’. In every generation we will have to somehow fight for our survival against those who wish us wiped off the face of the earth, but in every generation we will arise victorious. This is certainly true for the story of mine and many other Ashkenazi families: Pogroms, Holocaust, Refuseniks and undoubtedly more challenges ahead as violent fascism rises across the West with recent fascist rallies in Spain and Italy to name a fraction. But the Jews are still here. Despite all these attempts, 14 million of us are still here and will continue to fight for the survival of our people in the memory of those who have been taken. Every generation a new Pharaoh arises, and every generation we must show resilience and bring ourselves to liberation. Every generation must carry on with the hope of someday finding ‘Jerusalem’.

Guy – Friday night dinner

Guy’s homemade challah

For me, Jewish life has always been something inherently communal. Whether it be gathering with my extended family for Passover and Rosh Hashanah (the Jewish New Year), or experiencing Shabbat (the Jewish Sabbath) with friends on weekends away, the social aspect of Judaism has always been central to my experience of the religion.

One of my last memories of a normal Oxford was our JSoc Friday Night Dinner in 8th week. It all seemed a bit over the top at the time: being served food by committee members wearing gloves and a visor was something out of dystopian fiction, even as we sat ten to a table, tearing from the same loaf of challah bread. Within a week, such a gathering would be almost unthinkable, as the pandemic spread across the UK. Lockdown meant that my experience of Judaism changed massively. The big family gatherings for Passover and Rosh Hashanah were replaced with Zoom calls, whose novelty soon wore off. 100-person JSoc Friday Night Dinners were replaced by a small meal with just my household. Many of the practices and customs which were so integral to my culture and religion were no longer possible.

As things started to open up, we began to be able to find ways of celebrating in a Covid-safe way. A particular highlight of Michaelmas Term was the Jewish Society’s in-person Friday Night Dinners, all keeping to the rule of 6. They were a great chance to see old friends and meet new people, as well as to celebrate Shabbat together. As the tier system meant that new restrictions were put in place, we still found ways to celebrate – one particular highlight was a freezing Hanukkah celebration in my friend’s garden with doughnuts. 

I’ve also really started baking more because of lockdown. I love making challah bread – almost like a really soft and pillowy brioche. Even at university, I’ve made big quantities of challah and handed it fresh out of the oven to friends, or made pitta bread and delivered them straight into people’s pidges. This has been a great way to connect with Jewish holidays, through procrastibaking and then eating the delicious end product. It’s been strange celebrating Jewish festivals in a pandemic, but I’d like to think that I’ve made the most of it.

Image credit: Aaron Beppu. License: CC BY-NC-SA 2.0.

College policies vary after easing of national restrictions

0

Following the easing of national Covid-19 restrictions on May 17th, Oxford Colleges have begun to update their policies on teaching and college life. All students are now permitted to return to Oxford for the remainder of Trinity term but residency requirements are still suspended. 

In an email sent to all students on Friday, Pro-Vice-Chancellor, Professor Martin Williams outlined the University’s updated guidance and arrangements for Trinity term. The University asked students to “enjoy Oxford responsibly as the restrictions ease” and reminded them that they “must continue to follow all health guidance to protect the community. While the outlook is more optimistic and restrictions are gradually easing, the pandemic is not yet over”.  

Current government guidelines on social gatherings state that outdoor gatherings are limited to 30 people, while indoors, two households can meet or people can gather as a group of six. In emails seen by Cherwell, colleges have outlined how the easing of these restrictions will impact college life for the remainder for Trinity Term.  

While people from two households will be allowed to meet indoors, St Hugh’s students were advised not to “rush into each other’s households” and were reminded that “the driver behind this easing is to enable families and loved ones to be able to more freely spend time together – the ‘household’ definition used by the Government is probably not best suited to our student ‘households’ where we have large numbers and not much shared social space”. Households will be permitted to have visitors from a single other household. 

St Peter’s students will not be allowed to enter areas of the College not allocated to their own household and students will not be allowed to invite guests onto the College site. The College said: “We appreciate that this is less permissive than the national-level rules in place from Monday 17 May, but a review of our covid risk assessment has identified significant logistical and health and safety concerns should we relax the current rules.” However, groups of six students, regardless of household groups, will be allowed to sit together in the dining hall. A similar rule around household mixing will remain in place at St Catz where indoor gatherings will continue to be limited to one household in College accommodation and staircases. 

The household bubbles implemented at the beginning of the term will remain in operation at Regent’s Park but students can “freely mix within and between [their] current bubbles”. At Hertford, households will be permitted to have other Hertford members as visitors but the College “strongly suggest[s] that the rule of six is still useful as a guide”. Non-college members will not be permitted on the College site in Hertford, while at Regent’s Park, guests can access the College’s public areas and can attend meals, but will not be allowed to stay overnight.

Overnight guests will also not be permitted at St Hilda’s or Jesus but will be allowed on the colleges’ grounds. At St John’s College, individuals will only be allowed to meet with one other visitor in the College Gardens. Students at Pembroke were asked to avoid inviting visitors and to only do so if it is “essential”. 

Guests will be allowed to stay overnight at Balliol, Univ and St Edmund’s Hall, but students are reminded that government guidelines means that only one person per household may be permitted to have an overnight guest at one time. 

Colleges have also updated students on vacation residency in 9th and 10th Week of Trinity term. Students at St Edmund’s Hall are “welcome” to remain in college residence for 9th Week of term and will be charged “at the normal room rate”, and at St Hilda’s, students can also stay in 9th Week at normal vacation residence rates. All undergraduates at Hertford will be permitted to remain in College residence “for a period beyond the end of 8th Week”. Teddy Hall and Hertford have also outlined arrangements for events in 9th week which include BBQs, garden parties and formals. 

Univ told its students that any undergraduate may remain in College accommodation until July 3 and that additional accommodation will be charged at the College’s “lowest nightly rate”. Students may also apply for financial assistance with the cost of accommodation. The College also said that if “practical constraints allow” continuing undergraduates may return to College “one week before Welcome Week next year”.

Image Credit: Jill Cushen

In Conversation with George Robinson

0

Series three of Sex Education cannot come soon enough.

The hit show had over forty million households tune in to its first season, and I was one of the many fans who fell for a viral fake poster on social media which said that the third season would be out in January. We will, unfortunately, have to wait a little longer.

A highlight of the second season was the introduction of Isaac, Maeve’s sarcastic neighbour in the caravan park, who we all love to hate for deleting that voicemail. Cherwell sat down with actor George Robinson, who plays Isaac, to discuss his career, Sex Ed, and disability in the television industry.

Robinson, now 23, has had an interest in acting since his school days. ‘When I was in year 9, the school I was at were doing a production of Les Mis and I was doing drama at the time but I wasn’t 100% sure, and I didn’t audition for it… and then when I watched the production I got really annoyed at myself for not getting involved, and I vowed to myself never again. I just kept on pushing for it, and did a few of the school plays.’

At 17, Robinson sustained a spinal cord injury playing rugby. His neck was broken between the C4 and C5 vertebrae. He describes how this affected his interest in a future in drama.

‘I had been wondering about going to drama school, before that, but again, this injury made me sort of reconsider where I was at. When I came out of hospital, I finished my final year of school and considered trying for drama school, but at that time I wasn’t really sure of myself, and of myself as a performer. So I decided to go to university to study philosophy.’

I ask Robinson how his experience at university had been as a disabled student. He describes the transition as a difficult one, with acting providing him with a distraction from some of the challenges he faced. ‘My experience at university, I wouldn’t say was particularly amazing.

‘I don’t think that was necessarily the fault of the university at all, but because it came too early for me, in terms of adjusting. I had this hugely life-changing event, and then I went back to finish my final year at school, but that was my old school, with people that I knew, teachers that I knew, buildings that I knew. I knew which buildings I could get in and out of. And going to university, all of a sudden I was in a much bigger city, in places that I didn’t know, with people I didn’t know, and it was a bit of a shock.

‘So I think I became more insular, perhaps. And that’s where the drama and the acting helped me to sort of escape a bit of that.’

While at university, Robinson began to explore the possibility of acting as a career: ‘I did a few plays with the Guild of Students, and then I took a screen acting class locally, and applied for an agency, and it all seemed to spiral from there. My second audition was for Sex Education.’

‘The casting call that went out for Isaac was essentially a list of characteristics, you know – witty, dark sense of humour, plays off negativity with sarcasm and stuff.

‘And I sort of read that and went yeah, I can do that.’

Robinson’s wry smile makes it clear that despite Isaac’s flaws, he is very fond of the character.

The casting call specified a disabled actor, but gave no requirement for a specific disability. ‘They basically said, as part of the call, we will write the character based around who we cast. The script that I initially read for was for someone who was an amputee.’ George explains that such a call made it clear that Netflix would handle what he terms the ‘boring logistics’ of a specific disability.

I ask if this type of casting call – where the disability is written in after the actor is cast – was becoming more common, and more generally about the challenges faced by disabled actors in casting decisions. Robinson links the problem to the type of content being produced.

‘Recently, there have been a lot of things based around old material, and often it’s harder to rejig something that’s already established to make it accessible, because there are boring plot elements that someone with a disability needs adaptations to make work.

‘But with [Sex Education], they obviously said that they would make sure all of that was sorted out, and it seems like it’s moving in the direction where writers are far more open-minded about not only casting people with disabilities but also following through and making it accurate and positive.’

More broadly, Robinson talks about the importance of inclusion in improving the representation of disability in film and TV: ‘Inclusion, but not only in terms of casting – I think casting is a great way of doing it, and I’m so incredibly grateful for the people at Sex Ed for the fact that they’ve got Isaac as a character at all – but also inclusion within the creative process itself. Because one of the first things you hear if you want to be a writer, is ‘write about what you know’ and a lot of the time writers don’t know disability, and that’s not necessarily a fault with them, but it’s something that hasn’t necessarily come into their thoughts so you see bits where writers reach out to charities, ask around.

‘They included me in the creation process of Isaac, for example. It’s definitely getting there, but we just need to remind ourselves that there’s some ways to go.”’

When asked if he felt pressure auditioning for the second season of such a wildly popular show, he shrugs it off. ‘I sort of demoted it to the back of my head to “I’ve got an audition for a Netflix show, that’s good enough in itself”, so that helped me relax into it.

‘And also I sort of ignored my uni work, so I was really prepared for it!

‘In terms of coming onto Sex Ed, I was just excited to be a part of it, really, and just join in with these people that I’d seen. Part of my audition process was a chemistry read with Emma Mackay and she was really helpful in that process.’

Sex Education is known for breaking taboos and for transgressing the boundaries of what is shown and talked about on television. Speaking about this, Robinson says: ‘When I watched the first series, I got it [the concept] immediately, in terms of what it was going for, and I guess maybe with the benefit of hindsight, it seemed obvious that if there was going to be one show to [represent disability accurately], it was going to be Sex Ed, with its wonderful diverse cast and frankness about things we haven’t necessarily seen before.

Sex Ed is a show that approaches all sorts of taboos. And you can see it in terms of how other shows since the release of Sex Ed have actually been inspired by Sex Ed to sort of, branch out and approach those as well, and you’re starting to see the entire narrative surrounding disability open up across TV. And it’s just really exciting to be a part of that.’

In response to my questions about season three, Robinson remains tight-lipped, saying only that filming was ‘going good.’ It was reported that filming had finished on the third instalment a couple of weeks ago, with a crew member posting an Instagram story with the caption ‘That’s a wrap!’.

The series was announced in February 2020, but filming was delayed due to the Covid-19 pandemic. Speaking about his experiences throughout the pandemic, Robinson gives an optimistic ‘It’s been alright.’

He describes feeling lucky that his continuing role in Sex Education has meant that he hasn’t faced some of the struggles other actors have had as filming for many programmes has been disrupted.

‘For me personally, a lot of the issues that actors have had is the uncertainty of ‘there’s nothing on, I don’t know when I’m next going to get a job, when I’m next going to get paid, and stuff.’ But, knowing that I have got a job in Sex Ed has really sort of eased the financial anxiety and knowing that that is there has been really helpful.’

The season two finale saw Robinson’s character Isaac deleting a voicemail from lead Oti (Asa Butterfield) to Maeve (Emma Mackay). Bizarrely, some fans of the show chose to lash out at Robinson for this, and he was subject to online hate. He seems to have dealt with it with a sense of humour.

‘When I read the script initially I did think “Okay, Isaac isn’t going to be the most well-loved character” and I think that when this – outcry let’s say, and I started receiving a lot of messages of people – well, luckily, they searched my name, which is good publicity, I guess – yeah so they searched George Robinson, and then proceeded to message George Robinson with the profile of George Robinson saying “Hey Isaac, I hate you.”

‘I screenshot the funniest ones and send them into my mate’s group chat.’

He is aware, however, that this approach doesn’t always work, and debates the potential for these messages to have an ableist sentiment behind them.

‘I don’t want to seem glib about it. That’s just the way I personally process these things. And initially when [the hate] did start coming through, I hadn’t been in that position before, so I did flag it up to my mates in the cast, just saying, this is happening, just so you’re aware.

‘I have been wondering, you know, “Had any character done it, what would the response have been?” – regarding whether I was in a chair or not.

‘I think a lot of it is ingrained with the current state of meme culture; there’s a lot to unpack with it.

‘A meme is a very superficial form of communicating – you essentially add the context that you want onto this image. Isaac is a wheelchair user, but the reason people hate him or dislike him is for reasons outside of that. However, a meme superficially wants to get across what you want. And visibly, you know, looking at Isaac, he is a wheelchair user, and therefore – “Right, I’m going to send a picture of a wheelchair on fire” or “Wheelchair being pushed down a cliff.” So it’s hard to gauge whether that is in itself ableist.’

These are important questions, ones that will no doubt be further explored in the upcoming series of Sex Education

Sex Education series one and two are available to stream on Netflix.

The Undercurrent: Student Union election time!

It takes a special kind of confidence to look at the last Students’ Union election and think: “that looked like fun, I’ll give it a go next time!” However, seemingly unaware of the unmitigated disaster that unfolded over last term, a jaw-dropping 11 candidates have thrown their hats into the ring to become our new SU President. Their manifestos can be found here

One lucky candidate will become our new supreme leader on Thursday night, assuming charge of a groaning bureaucracy that claims to run everything that happens in Oxford while giving off the unnerving impression that it does absolutely nothing. I have to admit that I’m not entirely what the SU actually does. I know it supports The Oxford Student as well as Oxford Raise And Give, making it responsible for two rags. Other than that, however, I must admit that I remain blissfully ignorant of its role in student life. 

For the sake of some clarity, I turned to the SU website, which apparently contains a plethora of information about this immense student body . The first page I visited was entitled ‘who we are’, and opens with one of the most banal lines I’ve ever read: “We’re called the Students’ Union because that’s what we are; a union of students.”

 I briefly wonder who could possibly have gained any clarity from that statement, before deciding that it simply isn’t worth it and moving on to the ‘what we do’ section. I would recommend browsing the ‘Covid’ priority page, which lists the names of several key SU members under the atrociously worded heading “who’s making it happen”. Tragic, really. If only the WHO had known sooner. 

There still doesn’t seem to be any obvious incentive as to why you would want to become President. Other than a £21,326 salary and the privilege of sitting on dozens of student councils, there aren’t any real perks. That seems irrelevant, however, given that so many people are clearly happy to take that chance. 

The lineup of candidates is pretty varied, ranging from empty-chair candidates to people who seem to have made a concerted effort to join literally every student society at Oxford. Some of the manifestos are incredibly detail-oriented and delightfully pretty, others seem to take a more brutalist approach to design. For each of these plucky candidates, the last obstacle on the road to the Presidency is a deeply undignified wave of grovelling messages to dozens of people they’ve never met. 

Perhaps I’m being too cynical. I’m constantly put to shame by the students who channel their optimism and passion into improving all our lives at this university, given that I can barely convince myself to write a sub-par Cherwell column without a ‘reward wine’ perched in my periphery. I hope whoever is elected as the next SU President does a great job, especially if they can do it without messaging me first.

Art by Justin Lim.

Election results: Balliol Student wins Labour seat in Oxfordshire County Council

0

The May 6th election results for the City Council and County Council, as well as the Police and Crime Commissioner have been released. 

Labour won the City Council election, with a total of 34 seats. The Lib Dems received nine seats, the Greens three. Two independent candidates were elected. The City Council tackles issues such as housing, parks and mobility.

No party won a majority in the County Council elections. Of the 62 seats, 22 went to the Conservative group, 21 to the Lib Dems and 15 to the Labour Party. The Greens Party won three seats, and the two remaining seats went to the Henley residents group and an independent candidate. The County Council provides infrastructure and manages issues such as street lighting and bin collection. 

None of the Police and Crime Commissioner candidates received a majority in first votes. However, Conservative Party member Matthew Barber won in the second preference poll, receiving almost 80,000 more votes than his closest competitor, Laetisia Carter from the Labour Party.

The Oxford Mail has reported that a significant number of ballots cast for the City Council only had one cross. In past years, voters could only vote for half of the council at once, while this year voters were allowed to vote for the whole council. This meant that this year, they could choose two candidates. 

The Oxford Mail has also reported an “administrative error” in the County Council election of Banbury Ruscote ward, which was won by a candidate of the Conservative group. It writes that Labour is planning to make a “legal challenge”. If won, both the Lib Dems and the Conservative group would have 21 seats in the County Council. 

Amongst the elected Councillors is student candidate Michael O’Connor, who ran in a central ward covering 25 colleges. O’Connor is currently a graduate student at Balliol, and ran on behalf of the Labour Party. Speaking to Cherwell, O’Connor cited COVID-19 restrictions as one of the most difficult elements of his campaign. “Until late March, we couldn’t knock on doors. That was a big restriction and meant that the campaigning period was very compressed. Additionally, we couldn’t hold events in colleges.”

“Nonetheless, we knocked on pretty much every door in the residential areas of the division during April [and] early May and ran quite a good social media campaign with the help of a huge network of supportive students. In the end, turnout was really quite good. Labour increased its vote share in University Parks and won all of the overlapping city wards. We’re alive and well in Oxford!”

Concerning how he will represent this student body, O’Connor said: “I’m keen on engaging students with county policy-making through assemblies or consultations or just being quick to respond to emails!” Talking about his future plans in the role, O’Connor stated: “I’ll still be a student and will probably remain so for the foreseeable future. I think I’m expected to spend 2-3 days a week on council duties but realistically I’ll probably spend much more than that as these kind of things tend to overflow the boundaries of working days”.

OULD and OUCA have been contacted for comment.

Image Credit: Jill Cushen