Tuesday 5th August 2025
Blog Page 342

All kinds of vulnerable: reflections on the past year

0

While the worst some could imagine was a life without pubs, the worst I could imagine was the loss of my three closest family members. Upon reaching the one-year anniversary of the first lockdown, I have had the chance to reflect on the events of the past year. My experience, one of constant fear for the safety of my family, still haunts me a year on.

As keen as I am to forget the trauma of the last year, I feel a duty to reflect. Living with a vulnerable family during a global pandemic was frightening, to say the least. As the one non-vulnerable person of the family, the weight of responsibility to keep my family safe was suddenly shifted onto my shoulders as I learned of the horrifying effects of the virus on the clinically vulnerable.

I was in my final year of secondary school when the first lockdown was announced in March 2020. Not only had my school year been curtailed by the announcement, but so had an entire chapter of my life. Initially, the effects of Covid were limited to uncertainty about exams and university places, and rushed goodbyes with friends and teachers. There was a mutual anxiety shared by anyone who was in Year 13 during the start of the pandemic. Saddened by the way in which our memories of school life were ending and anxious for how this pandemic would affect our future prospects, our year group felt isolated and lost, unable to find solace in the government’s decisions.

At this point, we were still feeling no active threat to the health of the populace and our minds were crowded with anxieties regarding our own futures. However, as the death toll rapidly rose, worries about my own future dissipated and became altogether insignificant as I became increasingly worried about the welfare and health of my family. Throughout my life I have lived with my mum and my two grandparents — all three of whom qualified as extremely clinically vulnerable. This meant that they were required to shield, for if any of them were to contract Covid, the likelihood of a very serious, if not fatal, outcome was extremely high. Overnight, my entire world shifted — their safety and welfare became my priority.

I found myself having to adapt my fairly self-absorbed way of life to the needs of my family. Suddenly, it didn’t matter that I was bored or that I was missing out on my final year of school — there were greater things to worry about. Every anxiety I felt about my social life and a wasted summer felt trivial in comparison to my family’s fight for safety and health. This idea reverberated throughout the country as attention was turned away from the missed frivolities and was instead directed towards the key workers and the vulnerable members of society.

Naturally, this priority shift changed and affected my day-to-day routines. The weekly grocery shop required a task force. Fully masked and gloved and on our knees, my mum and I would meticulously disinfect every grocery item that had been delivered before storing it away. As the least vulnerable, I was sent out to the shops draped in PPE, but despite my ridiculous protective attire, I still came back racked with paranoia that I could be bringing the virus home. The fear was constant. Wearing gloves when opening the post, disinfecting the doorbell each time it was rung, and obsessive handwashing became routine in our house. Every simple household task was made more tedious — as the severity of the pandemic heightened, the safety precautions we took only increased. My motivation to protect my family was spurred on by the constant reminder of the prospects that awaited them should they be exposed to the virus. One shocking news headline was enough to make me run around the house with anti-bacterial spray, frantically cleaning doorknobs and handles. My Dettol spray and I grew to be inseparable.

However, it got to a point where such routines took a toll on my mental wellbeing. I found myself drained not only from the constant disinfecting but also from the sheer emotional exhaustion that came from my permanent state of worry. Every day I woke up to what felt like a perpetual anxiety. For a while I had taken comfort in my friends — I rested assured that the whole country was in the same boat experiencing the burdens of lockdown. However, even when restrictions were eased, so long as I was shielding with my family, those positive changes would not apply to me.

This is when it started to dawn on me that the country was moving forward and those in vulnerable households were being left behind. The FOMO set in as social media reminded me that I was now at a loss — I was totally healthy, yet here I was indoors and shielded from the world. There’s a difference between knowing you can’t go out anyway and therefore not going out, and knowing you can go out and still choosing not to. The clinically vulnerable had no choice about staying indoors, but I did: I was living my life every day as if I was vulnerable, but I wasn’t. I was living with restrictions which were entirely self-inflicted. Living with the feeling of I could be out right now was heavy as I kept on reminding myself that the anxiety would be all be worth it once my family came out in good health at the other end.

This anxiety was only amplified by a deep frustration I felt. Those not at medical risk who had been given some aspect of freedom (the freedom to walk and interact with other households) were abusing their liberty, which meant that another spike in Covid cases was triggered. The irresponsible exercising of their freedom brought with it only more restrictions and more days locked inside for those who were shielding. Families like mine were paying the price for other people’s carelessness. I felt a distinct lack of empathy during this time; the doors were open for those not at risk to go out into the world, but the vulnerable were quickly forgotten.

It took a few more months before government advice stated that it was safe for shielding families to go on walks, and this freedom felt overwhelmingly good. Skip a few months forward and my entire family had received their vaccines. The past year has been one of pain, grief and realisation. There has been nothing I regret, and I would do it all again for those I love. I realised the value of family and my ability to de-prioritise my own needs when it comes to protecting loved ones. I have also realised that there were all sorts of vulnerable people throughout the pandemic. Whilst I wasn’t medically vulnerable, the pandemic made me vulnerable to an array of emotions. The loneliness and frustration and exhaustion also contributed to my mental vulnerability. A year on, I look back and think that all of us were in a sense, some kind of vulnerable. Dealing with loss, guilt, grief, anxiety and fear every single day made each person who lived through the pandemic some kind of ‘at risk’. We were all at the mercy of the virus, whether it be medically, emotionally or mentally, and it is this shared vulnerability I take solace in.

Image credit:<a href=”https://www.freepik.com/photos/hand”>Hand photo created by freepik – www.freepik.com</a>

Looking a right punt

0

Punting is one of those things that I had always associated with Oxford in the abstract. I can still remember walking around Christ Church Meadows during interviews, seeing groups of students huddled in punts, puffer-adorned and wine-drenched, like Elysian gods on cerulean water. The punting of Oxford and Cambridge has a distinct prestige; talk of quants, tills and all the lexis of punting somehow became emblematic of my desire to attend Oxford, with all its opulence and archaic excesses.

So, when I eventually arrived at Oxford, punting was at the top of the to-do list. It would be a rite of passage, something that would affirm my status as a student of Oxford – transformative, transcendental. It is perhaps fitting then that the chance to punt came on matriculation, the day that I actually was confirmed as an Oxford student. Wrangling COVID-restricted matriculation was an odd thing in and of itself. Missing the contact with higher years, none of us really knew what we were supposed to do, aside from getting dressed up in flappy gowns and a suit, take pictures by the Rad Cam and drunkenly terrorise the residents of Oxford. So, after a rather depressing watch party of the online Formal Welcome, the only logical step was to drink an enormous quantity of wine, cram in a McDonald’s and stagger down to the Isis in the hope of finding a punt.

With a crew assembled of four similarly inebriated Univites, we took to the water. Suffice to say that our technique did not mirror that of the Venetian gondolas. Any smoothness of motion remained elusive, as the quant was wielded like a lightsabre, hacking at the riverbed and more often than not leaving us drifting horizontally down the river. Not that we really minded – the fact that we were subfusc wearing students in a punt was enough to sate our headiest conceptions of Oxford life. As we zig-zagged down the straight of the river, music blaring, all seemed to be going well. But, as it turns out, cornering in a punt after two bottles of wine is no easy feat. We very quickly became jammed beyond repair, and of course, the only logical solution was to rock the boat from side to side. Needless to say, that one second I was standing and the next I was submerged in the murky water of the Cherwell, as was another of my crewmates. After flailing futilely for a while in the water, we eventually managed to haul ourselves back into the punt, sodden and delirious. The most profane of acts was then performed, as we two abandoned our punt-mates and jumped onto the riverbank, to seek the warmth of college. If this first foray into punting was certainly unsuccessful, it was only made worse by the fine we were slapped with for bringing our boat back late; yet it remains one of my fondest memories of Oxford.

Punting seems to return me to the visions of Oxbridge students glimpsed in literature, the sloth and excess of the undergraduates of Thomas Hardy’s Jude The Obscure, the students of Evelyn Waugh’s Decline and Fall, and E. M. Forster’s Maurice. And so even if punting for me started as a self-satisfying fulfilment of Oxbridge status, it now seems to me an act that I cannot dissociate from my own experience of Oxford, even though I definitely looked a right punt whilst doing it.

Image credits / CC BY-NC-ND 2.0

OULC elects new Co-Chairs after failure to resolve internal dispute

0

Laura Ennis and Danial Hussain have been elected as the new Co-Chairs of Oxford University Labour Club after the previous Co-Chairs stepped down following a series of issues in regards to an internal complaint. 43 members voted for the pair, with over 60 members attending the online extraordinary general meeting.

In their manifesto, Danial and Laura spoke of the importance of working with their BAME caucus officer to implement recommendations made to the club by Melanin, a student led-group aiming to “a welcoming environment where we can talk about the ethnic minority experience.” The pair also want to ensure that all colleges have an “active college rep,” and implement a welfare officer as “being on committee can take a mental toll and we think [that] OULC should be better equipped to deal with this.” 

The two Co-Chairs of Oxford University Labour Club initially elected for this term resigned following a series of issues in regard to responding to an internal complaint. In a resignation letter sent to members of the Labour Club, one of the Co-Chairs stated that they hoped their resignation would “allow for members to feel more confident in their committee, and that it will provide some form of resolution to the current situation the club finds itself in.”

The dispute was initially resolved, whereby it was decided that the two Co-Chairs would not step down and would instead work to ensure “constitutional and club reform, antiracism training, and a public apology” were put into place. The decision for resignation was made after an internal meeting, with the Co-Chair citing the “emotionally and mentally taxing” situation for the committee and the need to ensure closure as reasons for the resignation.

Their statement went on to say that “OULC is not a place for sleazy or petty student politics yet at times members of committee have felt that issues that have genuinely caused distress have been weaponized, which is not what the OULC stands for.” The Co-Chair also issued an apology to BAME members for the “fraught and tense BAME caucus which does not represent the values that the club should uphold,” and went on to say that while the club did not have an adequate complaints procedure in place, “this does not excuse our failing in our duty of care towards members of the committee.”

The other Co-Chair stated that in their response to the complaint, they were “initially more worried about the consequences for me than how other members may feel.” The Co-Chair went on to consult with Melanin.  Although the Co-Chairs were initially voted by the committee to remain in their roles leading the club, they stated that “the resignation of a member of the committee made clear to us that the club could not move on without new leadership.”

Laura Ennis and Danial Hussain told Cherwell: “This has been a turbulent time for OULC, particularly so for members of the BAME caucus. Going forward, we want to provide both stability in the leadership of the club and aim to create an environment in which all members feel comfortable in having difficult discussions with and about the committee.”

“Our first steps in this direction are to implement the recommendations by Melanin. We are also in the process of introducing a formalised complaints procedure, which will ensure transparency in any future issues of this nature and make the committee more accessible to all members. In response to the stress that this has caused members, we are exploring ways to create a new welfare officer role, to support current and future members so that they are always supported and never have to feel alone in OULC.”

“We have faith that these are the right first steps to both substantially create change within the culture and institution of the club, and also to restore the faith of ethnic minority OULC members and the wider Oxford community.”

Image Credit: Billy Wilson / CC BY-NC 2.0

13:26, 17/05/2021: This article was edited to remove any implication that Melanin suggested the involvement of the University resolution services.

High levels of E.coli detected in Port Meadow swimming spot

0

As the weather warms, lockdown restrictions begin to lift, and students return to Oxford for Trinity Term, outdoor activities, including wild swimming, are on the rise. Students have been taking to the banks of Port Meadow for picnics, and some are venturing into the water of the River Thames. This idyllic summer image, however, is undermined by the alarming levels of bacteria that can be found in the water as a result of sewage dumping by Thames Water into the waterways in and around Oxford. 

A study funded by Thames Water and published by the group #EndSewagePollution found harmful levels of E. coli Bacteria present in The River Thames in Port Meadow from January to March 2021. At each of four tested locations, E. coli levels exceeded the threshold level for safe bathing water quality during three of the ten weeks. This study, amongst others, is part of a movement supported by Thames Water to turn Oxford into a designated bathing water area, allowing the already-existing population of wild swimmers to continue with their activities safely. 

Symptoms of E. coli infections include vomiting, stomach cramps, and fever. Diarrhoea is another common symptom, and around half of those infected develop bloody diarrhoea. In rare cases, an infection can lead to kidney failure. Tim Harris, an associate at the Rivers Trust, told the Oxford Mail: “We don’t know for certain whether these levels of bacteria are from raw sewage or other sources like agriculture – to know that, we need to wait for a few more months of results. However, this data indicates that, if you swam in the river this winter and swallowed some river water, you could have had an unpleasant dose of E. coli”.

A survey sent out by the Iffley Fields Residents Association Waterways group revealed in a set of results sourced in April that Port Meadow is the most popular bathing location. Participants cited “physical, mental, and spiritual rejuvenation” as the benefits they experienced through wild swimming. However, participants also cited “fear of pollution, fear of injury, and lack of access” as the major issues that are preventing people from enjoying the benefits of Oxford’s bathing sites. 

A petition on Change.org has over 5,000 signatures to give the Thames in Oxford, also known as the Isis, designated bathing water status. While the movement to achieve this status has been taken on by Oxford City Council, at the current levels of dumping, the water quality assessment for such a swimming area would still fall into the “poor” categorisation. In the meantime, various projects are in place to help swimmers make educated decisions about safety. Amongst these is a brand new alert system published by Thames Water that gives live updates on sewage discharges from six locations in and around the city. 

The alert system is currently operating via Twitter and Facebook, with updates stating “please be aware our monitoring systems at [discharge point] are indicating a discharge of diluted sewage to the river started at [time].” Recent updates have been coming in on what can sometimes be a daily basis.

The data from the 2020 Annual Thames Water Return reveals that last year, these six locations collectively produced a total of 281 spills and 3,817.62 hours of spill duration. While the levels of bacteria in the water could be in part due to local agricultural waste, it is clear that a significant amount of sewage has been contributing to the issue, as is currently allowed by law. If Oxford is to achieve designated bathing water status, the Environment Agency will create a water profile in addition to monitoring and protecting the water. This will provide the community with legal grounds upon which to fight against dumping into local rivers. 

The City Council’s bid will likely be submitted sometime before this autumn to be examined by DEFRA, the Government’s Department for the Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs, and hopefully accepted by next summer. The official DEFRA guidance on applying for such a designation requires that an application be supported by local authorities as well as including user surveys, information about any facilities at the site, and evidence of a consultation. User surveys must show a breakdown of the number of swimmers, children paddling, and other beach and water users. Local consultations must include any local groups that might be affected by the designation, including but not limited to bathers, residents of the closest town, local environmental groups, town councils, and local tourist offices. 

After an application has been submitted, DEFRA will consult the local water company, the Environment Agency, the Country Land and Business Association, the Marine Conservation Society, the Outdoor Swimming Society, Visit England, Water UK, and a number of other relevant groups. Ministers will make the final decision. 

Cherwell met with local community activist Ned Wells to discuss the movement to #EndSewagePollution. Wells is an Oxford resident, a graduate of Oxford Brookes University in Engineering, and a fly fisher. In fishing for wild trout, which are an indicator species, he realised that the Thames had poor water quality as it is not a suitable environment for the trout. When he was approached by another member of the campaign, Claire Robertson, Wells decided to help. 

Cherwell also met with Claire Robertson, a PhD student in freshwater ecology and avid year-round river swimmer. Robertson explained that one of the biggest obstacles in ending sewage pollution is the water companies’ outdated infrastructure: “Groundwater easily infiltrates into sewage pipes, meaning they rapidly overflow when there is heavy rain.”

Wells and Robertson cited four organisations as being particularly supportive of their goal: The Rivers Trust, Thames 21, Oxford City Council (specifically Councillor Linda Smith), and Thames Water. The Rivers Trust is a federated charity that has produced a GIS-based map (Geographic Information Systems). According to The Rivers Trust, this technology “helps develop an understanding of complex environmental systems, builds confidence and eases communication between a wide range of people and organisations who need to work in partnership to improve the water environment.” 

On Thames Water, Wells explained, “Although they’re the villain in this plot, they know the game is up and they know they’ve got to do something about it. There’s a charitable point of view that says that if lots of their customers are livid with them, it should be easier for them to get sign-off on the huge investment needed to make the sewage system fit for purpose.” Wells is working closely with Thames Water on the project to provide sewage alerts. Robertson elaborated, “Thames Water are providing funding for my time to work on the entire project, lab time and space for the bacterial water quality testing, and funding for equipment.”

Looking forward, Wells and Robertson say the team is feeling confident about the prospective success of the application to DEFRA, which is due to be submitted around October 2021.

The movement has truly been spearheaded by the “local community community of passionate river swimmers, paddlers, anglers, rowers, and nature enthusiasts,” Robertson explained, “the people of Oxford genuinely love their rivers, and want to see them clean, healthy, and well-protected.”

Richard Aylard, Thames Water’s sustainability director, said: “Discharges of untreated sewage are unacceptable to us, our customers and the environment, and we will work with the government, Ofwat, the Environment Agency and others to accelerate work to stop them being necessary.”

“Our business plan for the next five years includes an unprecedented amount of investment, much of it directed towards safeguarding the environment. We have a long way to go and we certainly can’t do it on our own – but the ambition is clear. Our aim will always be to try and do the right thing for our rivers and for the communities who love and value them.”

Iffley Fields Residents Association and Oxford City Council have been approached for comment.

Image Credit: AstacopsisGouldi / CC BY-SA 4.0

Will Biden’s Climate Summit Succeed?

By organising the virtual climate summit in April, Joe Biden didn’t fail to address one of his most important campaign promises, which is to tackle climate change in unprecedented ways. After four years of climate change denial under Donald Trump, this summit, that brought leaders of 40 countries together (Xi Jinping and Putin included), and Biden’s vow to halve the United States’ emissions by 2030, places the President and his country back as leaders in the fight against what he (rightly) considers to be the “existential crisis of our time”. This display of leadership will only strengthen his position ahead of the Glasgow COP26 taking place in November.

However, despite displaying this proactive attitude to fighting climate change, Biden’s plans for America and the rest of the world are fragile; for now, no one can confirm whether he will succeed in uniting the world around this pressing issue. Looking at the history of climate politics, it wouldn’t be the first time that promises are not kept when it comes to reducing emissions and increasing sustainability. Nonetheless, there are always some who do believe that “it’s different this time”, and it’s true that Biden’s extraordinary summit leaves room for optimism so let’s start by looking at what can keep our hopes alive.

Following Biden’s initiative to set more ambitious goals at home, other countries have decided to readjust their targets too. Justin Trudeau, who has been criticised and labelled a “climate laggard”, because of Canada’s lack of impetus in reducing their emissions, has made a commitment to reduce Canada’s emissions by 40-45% from 2005 levels by 2030, as opposed to the initially planned 30%. Similarly, Japan pledged to go carbon neutral by 2050, which puts them in line with the European Union as well as with America. Closer to home, Boris Johnson praised Biden for “returning the US to the front rank of the fight against climate change” and his government announced plans to cut the United Kingdom’s carbon emissions by 78% by 2035 compared to 1990 levels. Even China has spoken about their plans to reduce their use of coal. But will this list of commitments, pledges and targets suffice? Will these words turn into actions, and if they do, will they prevent the planet from overheating?

You might have noticed that Brazil and Russia have not been featured in the previous listing of “hopeful” promises. That is because Biden might have to consider himself lucky that the heads of these states were at all present for the discussions; especially noticeable was the presence of Vladimir Putin given the tense relationship he has with the United States. The president of the Russian federation hasn’t made any vows to reduce Russia’s dependency on fossil fuels; in fact, Russia’s greenhouse gas emissions have risen in the past few years, and so has the countries oil exportation, another matter that Putin did not address

Jair Bolsonaro, Brazil’s president and a well-known denier of scientific evidence when it comes to climate, made vague promises about stopping illegal deforestation and achieving carbon neutrality. As good as this might sound, very few experts believe these claims. Indeed, Bolsonaro has repeatedly weakened the institutions and organisations in charge of the protection of the Amazon rainforest, and if we look at the increase of deforestation (legal and illegal) since he has taken office, there is little evidence to show that he is willing to reverse the curve anytime soon. Needless to say unless those who contribute the most to the destruction of the planet are ready to make a significant effort on their own and together, Biden’s summit can be considered a flop.

Even for the countries who did make commitments, these are not binding words. Most countries are not on track to meet the goals set by the Paris Climate Agreement. According to the Climate Action Tracker (CAT), Gambia and Morocco are the only countries whose climate policies are compatible with the targets set by the agreement. With most countries’ efforts deemed as “insufficient”, “highly”, or “critically insufficient”, it is difficult to believe that Biden’s summit will suddenly galvanise countries around the world to change their ways. In fact, even at home, Biden’s plan to cut emissions is going to prove difficult. Congress is yet to be convinced, and even with the Democrats’ majority this isn’t a given. With no guarantee of how long Biden will stay in power and who could potentially replace him in the oval office, his efforts might be interrupted after just one term. 

Conversely, Xi Jinping is unlikely to face the prospect of being replaced anytime soon, his climate engagements above mentioned are in fact less promising that they first appear. Indeed, he spoke about a “controlled increase” in the use of coal for the next five years, and only then, actions will be taken to slowly decrease China’s use of coal. Furthermore, China is aiming for carbon neutrality by 2060, which is an impressive goal; however, they have not mentioned any targets for their methane emissions, which are likely to increase in the near future given the development of the Chinese farming industry.

So, what can we make of Biden’s summit? One thing which is certain is that it places him, his administration, and his country at the forefront of the fight against climate change. Nevertheless, if Biden wants to mark a real turning point, he needs to do more. He will have to take actions by reviewing trade deals with certain countries a step that no countries have previously taken for environmental reasons. Such measures will undoubtedly affect the lifestyle of most Americans, which is probably enough of a reason for any president to avoid acting this way. Even if Biden’s efforts to lead the transition to a more sustainable world are commendable, America can no longer be the sole driving force for change. This time there needs to be a joint effort from all countries to fully commit to making the fight against climate change their top priority. If they do not, “uncertain” would be an understatement when talking about the future of humanity.

Image credit: Gage Skidmore / (CC BY-SA 2.0)

Billie Eilish and the exhaustion of being a young woman in the public eye

Since Billie Eilish burst onto the pop music scene in 2016 with Ocean Eyes, her voice has reverberated around many a bedroom, club, and festival, cementing her as one of the defining female voices of our generation. She is the youngest person and second in history to win all four major awards at the Grammys. She has won two Guinness World Records and sang a Bond theme song aged just 18. The list is endless, making it irrefutable to say that Eilish is one of, if not, the, most accomplished young female music artists of our generation. So when her British Vogue cover broke this week, I anticipated comments about her accolades, about the candid conversation she has engaged in surrounding her Tourette’s Syndrome, and excitement for her sophomore album, Happier Than Ever,  which is set to be released this coming July.

Yet social media was whipped into heated debate about her outfit choice. 

Eilish’s entire interview her thoughts, her words, her feelings was swept under the rug, overshadowed by her ‘new look’ which many people felt invited them to discuss, and, as is the wonderful way of social media, rip apart (“She finally sold her soul, don’t expect her to go back to baggy stuff now!… proof that money can make you change your values,” wrote one Twitter user). A unique sense of fashion defined Eilish’s look as she came of age in the public sphere, with much of the media attention surrounding her focused on her taste for baggy clothing; it is understandable that this new look would generate a buzz, almost appearing as a milestone on her journey into adulthood a taste of the new Billie to come. However, the whirling discussion of Eilish’s decision to pose in corsets and lingerie for Vogue has completely saturated the internet in the past week. Many comments exuded anger, branding her a sell-out, even threatening to boycott her music.

Eilish was, until last year, when she turned 18, a child. Her decision to cover up was to protect herself from the hounding and over-sexualisation of young people, particularly young women, in the media. You only need to take one look at a tabloid newspaper and this will become clear as day. Upon wearing a tank top years ago, pictures of her chest went viral, with disgusting, predatory comments circulating about a teenage girl. A child. So she continued to cover up, explaining in a Calvin Klein campaign: “I never want the world to know everything about me. I mean, that’s why I wear big baggy clothes: Nobody can have an opinion, because they haven’t seen what’s underneath, you know?”.

Even then, she was attacked for her ‘weird’ dress sense, ridiculed and mocked; scrutinised for avoiding scrutiny itself.

Women do not owe you sex appeal, in the same way they do not owe you modesty. They owe you nothing. She was evidently not coerced into this shoot, and responded to the backlash on Instagram commenting “I love these pictures and I loved doing this shoot”. And while women in the public sphere should never feel pressured into taking off their clothes for a photoshoot, so what if they do choose to? Choice is the key word Eilish chose to cover up, and she can choose at any point to cover up again.

The whole fiasco reminded me of the age old saying: ‘you can’t do right for doing wrong’ young women cannot avoid scrutiny, no matter what they do. And it is exhausting. It is exhausting to be told that your humanities course is ‘girly’ and therefore ‘easy’, it is exhausting to be told you only got onto your STEM degree because ‘you’re a girl’. It is exhausting to be a prude if you cover up, but a slut if you don’t. It is exhausting to see yet another bright, brilliant, talented woman heckled for her clothing choice and for her achievements to be neglected for the sake of commenting on how much leg or chest she may have decided to show.

Enough is enough, I am exhausted of this very exhaustion. And so I embrace Eilish’s own words:  “Do whatever you want, whenever you want. F**k everything else.”

Artwork by Aleksandra Pluta.

ADHD among the dreaming spires

0

CW: Contains descriptions of addiction. 

“What the f*** is that?!” my friend blurted out, astounded. She’d just entered my room, to see my neatly-made bed, my pristine, spacious floor, and… a pile of one hundred plastic bags, floating on top of each other, gently tossed to one side.

“I mean to reuse them,” I said, “but I can never remember to take them to the shops with me.”

She stared as if she was still waiting for an explanation.

I have several stories like this. I was once half an hour early for a train, and then missed it because I was staring into space. I once sat an exam and answered every question twice… except the last one, which I forgot to read. I discovered my housemate had cacti only because I injured myself on them – twice.

“Airhead”, “ditsy”, “messy”, are words I previously used to describe myself, until I discovered four earth-shattering letters:

A-D-H-D.

I can’t say there was a time when things started to feel wrong, since for me they never exactly felt right. As a child, I could tell adults spoke to me differently. As a teenager, I was relentlessly bullied.

Oxford was, in many ways, my redemption. The status distracted me from my failures and the opportunities afforded protection to me.

As soon as I arrived here though, things started to fall apart. I missed deadlines; I missed lectures; I arrived 40 minutes late to most of my classes. Anything social was irresistible to me, even at midnight before a 9:00 a.m lecture. Socialising turned into heavy drinking; heavy drinking turned into risking my life.

A key difference between myself and my peers was they appeared to have some sort of “stop” threshold. After all nighters they’d have an early night in; I’d celebrate by meeting friends in the bar. After an essay crisis they’d manage their work better the next week; I’d up the crisis without even realising. By the end of first term they appeared fully fledged Oxford students, while I dealt with the symptoms of alcohol withdrawal.

It became clear to others I was struggling, and among many this invited empathy; I have a lot of love for those who supported me at my most vulnerable.

In a competitive environment, however, it also can breed one-uppance and disrespect. People sometimes asked me how my work was going, knowing my answer would make them feel better about themselves. People casually called me a “mess”, and appeared to enjoy pointing out my flaws to me. ADHDers respond to criticism extremely sensitively, and so I deeply internalized this. So, I hyperfocused myself away from self loathing. In other words, I was a workaholic.

The issue is this approach lacks balance. The parts of my life I’d neglected eventually caught up with me. And then came depression. I crashed.

Since then, I’ve been in a familiar cycle – work, hold it together, crash, repeat. Sometimes it’s on an hourly basis, sometimes it’s over the course of months.

I sort my sleep schedule. I attend all my appointments. I feel a calm, satisfactory peace. Then over time, an emptiness is unmasked — I feel disconnected, hollow, and in constant strife. Life is just swimming so you don’t drown, I think to myself. Will I ever feel truly rewarded?

So I slip. I go on my phone for 8 hours; I wake up drunk and needing to vomit; I leave a deadline until five hours before it’s due. Or it might be smaller — I order a takeaway instead of cooking for myself, and it just escalates.

It’s like jenga. I build a tower, I gradually remove blocks, and then BAM! I collapse.

As I researched ADHD, my life shifted into perspective. Years of social humiliation, confusion and failures suddenly made sense. I burst into tears when I read about the neuroscience of it.

To focus on tasks, a brain must be engaged. In a neurotypical brain, a careful balance of chemicals called neurotransmitters ensures this. Dopamine ensures they can start a task and pay attention to it. Noradrenaline keeps them awake and undistracted.

In ADHD brains, dopamine and noradrenaline are dysregulated. This causes us to flit between very-low and very-high levels of activity.

If we aren’t motivated to complete a task, then when we try to concentrate on it our brains shut down or flood with distractions. Studying feels like a constant battle. I think of three things at once while reading my lecture notes; I have the constant impulse to check my phone; I sometimes even become drowsy and lose consciousness.

When we encounter a task which is motivating, our nervous systems flood with motivation and reward – this state is called hyperfocus, and we have no direct control over it. We are so focused on one particular task that we lose all sense of time, proportion and consequences.I sometimes become obsessed with my problem sheets; I daydream all day thinking of a single good memory; I wrote the first draft of this article in a single night, and didn’t feel tired.

These immediate effects are primary symptoms. They create disruption at any given moment, and then it snowballs throughout the day. One of the most crippling symptoms of ADHD is executive dysfunction. Imagine you’re trying to type, but must manually find each and every letter every single time you touch the keyboard. Imagine you’re trying to walk, and must consciously and individually move every single muscle in your leg. This is what planning, organizing, remembering, and regulating is like for us. For this reason, self awareness alone doesn’t help much.

Secondary symptoms are scars which arise over a lifetime battle. They are particularly pervasive when we’re not diagnosed in childhood.

Before I was diagnosed, I often felt like I didn’t know quite how to be human. I put in effort, yet rarely succeeded; my attempts to connect were met with rejection; I felt on the outside of “life” because I could not become truly engaged with anything. I’d often lie in bed with thoughts whirling around in my head about how I’m worthless and a failure.

The experience I’m describing here is called Rejection Sensitive Dysphoria (RSD) – 98-99% of people with ADHD have it. Criticism and failure are extremely, intensely painful. In an attempt to avoid it, we may obsess over our failures, become career obsessed, develop an eating disorder, give up on trying entirely, or in my case: people pleasing. I regularly compromise my own safety, values and needs, for fear of angering others by being me. Much of my life is spent hiding.

The ADHD nervous system can contribute to RSD. It’s not hard to see how sensitivity and hyperfocus may lead one to be vigilant of failure. It’s worth noting too though, that the world constantly tells us we’re not trying hard enough. When I sought help, I was frequently told that nothing was wrong with me, I should “try harder”, and that the problems I was experiencing were normal – including by many health professionals. Often people would claim I was creating my concentration issues – pointing to my caffeine or alcohol consumption as evidence of this.

I believed everything was my fault and that I was looking for excuses. This actually stopped me from seeking help.

Or rather, it stopped me from seeking help for the third time. I was 17 when I was referred to Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services. I was 19 when I was discharged from Oxfordshire Adult Services and told “missing your lectures doesn’t mean you have a mental health problem” as tears rolled down my cheeks. This type of neglect is lethal; one in four women with ADHD attempt suicide.

Most doctors refuse to accept that ADHD exists. In fact, the NHS didn’t recognise it as valid until 2000 (for children) and 2008 (for adults). When I and most other ADHDers were born, our parents had no resources or sources of support.

The world blames them as “bad parents”, and they may internalize it, or grow to resent us. At least 40% of our parents have ADHD too, and so may already be struggling to cope. We spend our childhoods wondering what’s wrong with us, and why we’re causing our family so much pain.

Substance abuse is another extremely common symptom. Alcohol, marijuana, and stimulants are the most common drugs of choice, because the influx of dopamine alleviates our symptoms. Cocaine, in particular, is similar to Ritalin (an ADHD medication). When we take it, many of us feel calmer and more sober than we would without it. Upon learning this I felt betrayed by my brain – like I’d been born with an addiction to anything and everything. I recalled the times I’d drunk spirits specifically so I could complete my problem sheets, and the way this was laughed off by anyone I told. ADHD brains and substance-dependent brains have similar dysregulation of the dopamine reward system.

Many of us don’t take these drugs to feel high; we take them to feel sober.

The combination of ableism, trauma, and a binary nervous system can make for a toxic combination. ADHD has a lot of comorbidities, though it is also commonly misdiagnosed. On average, an adult will go through 6.6 antidepressant trials before finally being diagosed with ADHD. ADHD may mask-as or occur-with the following conditions:

Depression; Anxiety; Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder; Oppositional-Defiant Disorder; Learning Difficulties; Language Difficulties; Executive Dysfunction Disorders; Tourette’s; Autism; Borderline Personality Disorder; Addiction (on top of substances, this may be sex, videogame, internet, gambling, or spending addictions); Dissociative Disorders; Post Traumatic Stress Disorder; Bipolar Disorder.

Despite the challenges I’ve faced, ADHD is not a flaw, nor a death sentence. My hyperfocus is exactly what got me into Oxford – I was addicted to solving maths problems, and my hyperfocus compensated for my inability to sleep. The struggles we face aren’t purely the consequences of our nervous systems. We’re forced to be people we aren’t, shamed when we can’t live up to it, and given the wrong advice, consistently. Diagnosis and treatment can be life changing, since they break this destructive pattern.

Richard Branson, Albert Einstein, and Gillian Lynne (the choreographer of “Cats”) are among the may people who demonstrate ADHD neurotypes. Will.I.Am, founder of the Black Eyed Peas, credits his ADHD for his creativity. Simone Biles, who has 30 Olympic and World Championship medals, recently tweeted she’s not ashamed of her ADHD.

We are not deficient, we are different, and we’re raised not to know who we are.

A few months ago I suspended my studies, so I can focus on addressing my ADHD. I’d be lying if I said I wasn’t frustrated, but forcing myself into a neurotypical timeline has only ever hurt me.

Medication is already having a profound effect on me; I feel closer to “CEO ADHD” than I do to “crisis point ADHD”.

My struggles still feel like an overwhelming, vicious wilderness, but now instead of fumbling around blindfolded I see footsteps of those who’ve walked before. Through medication, support groups, and ADHD Life Coaching, I can glue my fragmented self together — not for the second, third, tenth or seven hundredth time, but for the first. Now this isn’t just stimulating — this is truly magnificent and exciting.

Artwork by Gbenga Chesterman.

Self-growth, Sin Miedo: The Rise of Kali Uchis

If you’ve been scrolling through TikTok recently, chances are you’ve heard the opening lines of telepatía by Colombian-American singer Kali Uchis. The song features on Uchis’ latest album and her first to be produced in Spanish, Sin Miedo (del Amor y Otros Demonios) translating as Without Fear (of Love and Other Demons). But what has led to Telepatía’s rise in popularity and what does the shift to writing in Spanish signify for Uchis?  

Kali Uchis, born Karly-Marina Loaiza, made her first splash into the music world in 2012 with her mixtape Drunken Babble written almost entirely in one night, at age eighteen, from her childhood bedroom. From the beginning, Uchis has been a bastion of entrepreneurial spirit and authenticity and in her latest album, this is more true than ever. Though Uchis has never hesitated to add Spanish to her music, and has always been proud of her Colombian heritage, I believe the move to an entirely Spanish album reflects a growing confidence in her self-image and her place in the world.  

Though songs such as ‘Know What I Want’ andLoner’ in Uchis’ first album Por Vida (2015) reflect her characteristic confidence and enjoyment of solitude, there remains a quiet but lingering uncertainty in other songs like Lottery. Here we see Uchis as a new singer taking tentative steps into the music world, self-consciously asking ‘Will you take this chance on me?’. However, by the time she produces her second album, Isolation (2018), Uchis’ confidence has skyrocketed and with that comes her first songs in Spanish, and a more confident celebration of her past. 

Uchis’ Colombian heritage is close to her heart, and this is one of the many themes of the past that is reflected in Isolation, an album that Uchis claims was written in a ‘subconscious’ manner. Growing up in her working-class immigrant household, Uchis recalled in a 2018 BBC interview how she witnessed her relatives work relentlessly in the US to support families back in Colombia, missing birthdays and graduations: “my entire childhood I watched everyone around me lose their lives trying to make money”. This experience is the motive behind her song ‘Your Teeth in my Neck’ which explores the exploitation of Latin-American immigrants. Here an anti-capitalist Uchis states how ‘Rich man keeps getting richer, taking from the poor’, asking ‘They’d take our worth, they pay us dirt / Is it worth it?’. Another song, Miami, explores Uchis’ childhood wish to escape her situation: ‘I was just a little girl / Had my sights set on a bigger world / Got myself a visa / And started catching flights to where the grass is greener’, but also subsequent feeling of having nowhere to go: ‘I’m always on the run / Now I can’t afford to look back’. Uchis also channels her Colombian heritage more in Isolation than previous albums with her reggaeton Nuestro Planeta, the album’s only Spanish-language song, featuring Colombian performer Reykon. 

“The potentially risky decision to produce a Spanish album to a predominantly English-speaking fanbase reflects Uchis’ consistent commitment to be authentic to herself.”

The decision to release a Spanish album with Sin Miedo can then be read as an explosion of confidence from Uchis: a complete ownership of her heritage that features a multitude of genres central to Latin American musical history, from the slow-tempoed bolero to fast-paced reggaeton. The potentially risky decision to produce a Spanish album to a predominantly English-speaking fanbase reflects Uchis’ consistent commitment to be authentic to herself, something she consistently refers to in her music and on her social accounts: “I just want to be the healthiest, most international & loving version of myself”, she tweeted on the 1st February this year.

However, Uchis’ music can transcend the barriers of language because it exudes both a tough self-reliance and a transcendental sense of self love, regardless of the language it is produced in. Described by the BBC as carrying ‘the hard-won determination of a woman who’s had to fight for her place in the world’, it is Uchis’ determination and her commitment to self-growth that resonates with both her English-speaking and Spanish-speaking fans. Sin Miedo is also characterised by its versatility, both in genre and theme, meaning it appeals to a wide range of emotions. From the raunchy te pongo mal and the unapologetic bossiness of¡aqui yo mando!’, to the dreamy ‘aguardiente y limón’ that mixes Edenic imagery with that of a well-known Colombian drink, to a simple yet visceral wish for peace in ‘quiero sentirme bien’, Uchis’ album is aptly named as she produces boldly and without fear. Uchis also utilises spiritual, metaphysical concepts in Sin Miedo in songs like ‘telepatía’, ‘vaya con dios’ and ‘ángel sin cielo’, which I believe is part of ‘telepatía’s’ popularity on TikTok an app where all things spirituality, witchcraft and manifestation are currently trending. The song’s title, telepathy, is also an ode to the intangible ways we can connect with the people we love. Written during a global pandemic, the idea of connecting even when apart is even more visceral. 

Sin Miedo’s closing track,ángel sin cielo’, further harnesses this idea of connecting to others even when alone. Written solo in her bedroom once again, Uchis ends her genre and language-barrier-defying album with a nod towards her roots: both her Colombian roots and the roots of her career, back when she produced an entire mixtape from her bedroom. With hauntingly beautiful vocals, a celestial Uchis softly sings ‘Ángel sin cielo / Hay que hacerlo sin miedo / La vida es una y a nadie le debo’ (‘Angel without heaven / You have to do it without fear / Life is one and I owe no one’). Uchis ends her chart-topping album with a celebration of something she has quietly done from the beginning: celebrated the power of being herself, unapologetically.

Image credit: The Come Up Show via Flickr – License: CC BY-ND 2.0.

Oxford’s Failure with Eating Disorders

0

CW: detailed description of eating disorders.

So much of the typical university experience centres around food and drink – this is perhaps the case even more so at the University of Oxford. With not only a culture of club nights, takeaways and kebab vans (which most universities propagate), at Oxford, we socialise through college formals, balls, crew dates, welfare teas and so much more. For those of us who have a history of disordered eating, this can prove pretty anxiety-inducing. Not to mention, with the highly anticipated June 21st rapidly approaching and the social eating that will come with this, the pressure to get the perfect body is more extreme than ever.

While many people restrict their eating due to having a perfectionist nature and a desire to meet the current beauty standard, others link their disorder to a need for control and order, emphasising that it has nothing at all to do with body image. It is generally accepted that Eating Disorders are worsened, and in some cases, entirely caused, by stress. This places Oxford students at a higher risk considering the elevated academic pressures we face in comparison to our friends at other universities. Rather than being expected to complete a couple of essays or problem sheets a term, we are confronted with at least one per week. It is therefore unsurprising that disordered eating is so prolific at our university. According to a survey organised by the SU in 2016, at least 1200 students at the University of Oxford are struggling with an ED, and these are only the ones who have spoken out. Given the fact that the number of people seeking help for mental illnesses since Covid has increased exponentially, it is a fair assumption to believe that there are far more than 1200 students suffering from EDs now.

Studies carried out by the National Institute for Health Care Excellence and Beat recognised that between 1.25 and 3.4 million people in the UK suffer from EDs and that the average age of onset for anorexia nervosa is 17 years old. This, paired with the anxiety of leaving home, and the pressure to have improved oneself physically (a culture cultivated by lockdown), we need support from our university now more than ever. The rise of TikTok alongside the increase in ‘at home’ blogger/influencer content means that a lot of what we have seen on social media during lockdown has been about food and exercise. Namely, many ‘what I eat in a day’ videos promote undereating, as well as unsustainable and unattainable workout regimes. Beat has seen a 140% rise in the number of people accessing support since 2020. EDs have the highest mortality rates among all psychiatric disorders, and research suggests that the earlier treatment is sought, the better the sufferer’s chance of recovery.

For these reasons, it is shocking, and frankly devastating that, having used the Oxford University’s Counselling Service myself, I can attest to specific instances in which I have been told that the University simply doesn’t have the facilities or support to help me deal with an ED, and that, while they’re happy to listen and to provide support in other aspects of my life, it is simply beyond their remit. Given the prevalence of EDs, not only among our age group but with the elevated risk (due to the intensity of our workload), it is hugely distressing to know that there is not a single counsellor or therapist in the Service trained in one of the most common psychiatric disorders.

While the Counselling Service offers personal and group therapy for dealing with issues such as anxiety and body image, it was made explicitly clear to myself and to other students that EDs should not, and indeed, must not be discussed in these sessions. The counsellors told us that they want us to separate body image issues and Eating Disorders, as they are too much to handle together, and because they are not trained in working with EDs. To me – and evidently, to many others using the Counselling Service – EDs and body image problems are not something which can ever be separated: they are two expressions of the same thing. The conversation surrounding food in any form was strictly prohibited in our therapy sessions, and this rule was extended to our private communication with one another as well; we were told that we mustn’t mention food to each other in any way.

Considering the intrinsic link between body dysmorphia/body image issues and restrictive eating, this forced segregation is unhelpful and potentially dangerous. By banning any talk of food and EDs in sessions with students who are openly seeking help and advice, and simultaneously offering them no alternative forum to discuss these issues, the university forces us to internalise our EDs and to battle them alone. Bearing in mind that the Service’s therapy groups only operate in term-time and that we are encouraged to engage in only one form of counselling (i.e. to leave any one-on-one therapy), we face over a month with no professional help for our EDs during the vacation. Our one support network, namely, our friends suffering from similar conditions, also becomes unavailable to us. This March, my group were given an ultimatum by our councillors: to either leave group therapy halfway through our course of treatment or to disband our group chat and private communication.

Some people may be asking why we don’t simply seek help outside of the university. For the majority, for whom private healthcare is not an option, the NHS waiting lists are simply too long to ever be practical, and this itself is evidence of the national Eating Disorder crisis we face in the UK. For instance, the waiting time at Cotswold House for ED services is 25 months as of 2020 (noted from the Facebook page ‘End the Eating Disorder Crisis’). Expecting someone to suffer alone for over two years is simply not acceptable, and often, life-threatening. Beat has been running a campaign to End the Eating Disorder crisis, by urging the Vice-Chancellor to recognise this huge issue in the university. Through an open letter, Beat urges the Counselling Service to hire a trained dietician and for college nurses to be educated in managing Eating Disorders.

According to a Beat student survey in 2020, 70% of students who engaged with the University Counselling Service expressed feeling that their counsellor or nurse did not have sufficient experience or knowledge of EDs. From both personal experience and those of many of my friends, I can confirm that counsellors in the Service have explicitly stated that such issues surrounding EDs are ‘too complex’, and support simply cannot be provided by the university.

This is a plea to the University to please listen to your students. We are struggling, and sufficient support is simply not being provided. For those of you who would like to support this cause, please sign Oxford Beat Society’s open letter to the Vice-Chancellor, urging her to consider the issues stated in this article more seriously.

Beat provides information and support for anyone affected by an eating disorder. You can call their student helpline at 0808 801 0811, or visit them at beateatingdisorders.org.uk.

Image Credit: BeatEDCharity via Wikimedia/ License: CC BY 3.0

Correction: The University Counselling Service disputed the claim that the University has no counsellors trained in Eating Disorders. They have a medical consultant with extensive professional experience of working with patients with eating disorders, whilst other staff members have substantial experience of working therapeutically with eating disorders in young adults. They also stated that their service should not be seen as a specialist eating disorder treatment unit and should not be judged against such a standard.

“We’ve come a long long way together” Liverpool’s ‘First Dance’

0

Just over a week ago, around 3,000 people descended upon an old warehouse in the centre of Liverpool to take part in a 2-day trial rave as part of a scheme by Public Health England. The event, aptly named “The First Dance”, boasted a line-up of the likes of Fatboy Slim, Yousef and The Blessed Madonna. There was no social distancing and face masks were optional. The goal was simple – party like it’s, well … before March of 2020?

The rave was organised by nightlife provider Circus and was part of the UK Government’s ERP, or Events Research Programme – a string of pilot events intended to study how the virus spreads in a range of different environments. Liverpool is set to be the host of many, including an outdoor festival in Sefton Park on May 2nd, and several open-air cinema screenings at the Luna Cinema. It is hoped that data from these events will help restrictions be safely lifted in the roadmap out of lockdown and will provide a guide for other festivals and gatherings happening this summer. But whilst these events are a chance for people to let their hair down, they also come with their own rules and restrictions. For the rave at Bramley-Moore Dock, all participants had to take one lateral flow test before and after the event, be current residents of the Liverpool City Region, and registered showing no symptoms of Covid-19. All money at the event had to be pre-loaded onto an individual wristband, reducing the risk of transmitting the virus across surfaces. The list of requirements for entry was long, as was the time spent waiting in a digital queue for tickets, which took hours in some cases.

It can’t help but be noticed that Liverpool has become somewhat of a guinea pig for pilots like these. The city has often been in the foreground in the battle against Covid, not only was Liverpool the site of mass-testing in November of 2020, then under the strictest tier of restrictions for much of the remainder of the year. For a city whose economy is so reliant on nightlife, hospitality and visitors, the promise of a return to mass-scale events is nothing short of exciting.

I was able to speak to Ella Bedingfield, a 2nd-year student at the University of Liverpool, one of the lucky ticket holders who attended the event. Although a return to large gatherings with no social distancing is no doubt a daunting prospect, she wasn’t too nervous to turn up. With everyone back at uni, she says, students are tested all the time anyway – the whole process just felt normal. There weren’t many nerves leading up to the event, as everybody knew what they were going into and what to expect. I want to go again,She said, “it was just so so fun. It was such a nice atmosphere there.” The feeling of happy excitement of people heading out for their first night out post-lockdown definitely gave a boost of energy.

“it was just so fun, It was such a nice atmosphere in there”

Despite the long process of applying for tickets, being tested, and lining up for the event, this still wouldn’t deter her from going a second time. “It was quite a long process. But it definitely didn’t put me off, I would definitely do it again.” After all, queues and bag checks are normality for festivals and raves all over the UK as it stands, and a small amount of inconvenience is unlikely to put many off returning to the dancefloor after months of hiatus. When asked if the layout of such events might be a feasible plan moving forwards, she replied that perhaps in the future there wouldn’t need to be such a long application process, and with more choice of events taking place, there would be less of a wait for each one.

It looks likely that mass-tested events like these may become the norm for the near future, or at least until the vaccination of the whole of the UK becomes a reality. But the outlook for this summer is still unclear, and although many festivals such as Creamfields and Boardmasters are still set to go ahead, nobody is sure of what they will look like. Many festivals are assuming no need for social distancing at all, relying on the fact that Covid restrictions are set to be all but gone by June 21st. Yet carrying on full-steam ahead seems somewhat risky, especially since a major issue facing future festivals is the lack of pandemic-specification cancellation insurance, in case scheduled events aren’t able to happen. However, should every festival-goer be required to show proof of a negative test before entry just as they have been in Liverpool, there might be some chance of security at these events.

“it looks likely that mass-tested events like these may become the norm for the near future…”

I was sceptical that many people might not bother to send off the second test after the Liverpool event, and Ella also agreed with me that is certainly a possibility. “It’s not a very nice thing to do a test,” she says, “I think a lot of people just won’t. But I guess lots of people will have, because lots of people really do want it to continue.”

It can only be hoped that the dream of seeing the music and nightlife scene in the UK return to normal will spur people on to get tested. Whilst the collective experience of the Bramley-Moore Dock rave was overwhelmingly positive, we can only hope and wait for an overall negative result.

Image Credit: Ella Bedingfield