Tuesday, April 29, 2025
Blog Page 296

Oxford University accepts 92% of offer holders

0

After A-level grades were decided by teachers’ assessments for the second year running, the University of Oxford has announced that 92% of offer-holders have been accepted. This means the University’s intake is inline with average years.

Around 3,265 students have been admitted in the 2021 admissions cycle. In 2020, 3,695 students were admitted after a u-turn by the government meant that students who were downgraded by the algorithm would receive the grades their teachers submitted.

A statement from Oxford University confirms reports that fewer offers were made than usual, in anticipation that more students than usual would meet the grades required for their course. The 3,543 offers made is 8% lower than in an average year. This means that 92.15% of offer holders have been accepted.

The University said: “Oxford University is delighted to celebrate the success of our offer-holders, whose places have been confirmed today. Their achievement is all the more impressive this year, and we congratulate them and their teachers, schools and families, after a hugely challenging 18 months.

“Since the outbreak of the pandemic and resulting widespread disruption to education, the University and its colleges have worked closely with individuals and schools to minimise the impact on prospective students. We have worked to ensure they have all the information and guidance needed to make strong applications.

“Despite the disproportionate impact of the pandemic on school pupils from less advantaged backgrounds, last year’s new undergraduate intake to Oxford showed the first signs of this work paying off, as the University accelerated  the trend of an increasing number of places going to students from UK state schools. While admissions results under current circumstances cannot be compared meaningfully to previous years, our aim for 2021 has again been to secure an undergraduate intake that continues to reflect our priorities and builds on the progress of recent years. More detailed data will be available in due course, but the figures released today show a continuation of the positive trends of recent years.”

68% of the 2021 intake come from state schools, and 20% from the “least advantaged backgrounds”. 57 students from state schools who narrowly missed their offer who had experienced “significant extenuating circumstances” were admitted.

Exeter College has admitted all of its offer holders.

Oxford University’s statement continued: “Our work during the pandemic has included moving Open Days and our flagship outreach programmes online. More than 35,000 people have participated in our online Open Days, while last summer saw 1187 Year 12 students from less advantaged backgrounds attend our UNIQ Digital access programme, spanning 30 academic courses. 80 Oxford applicants participated in the Target Oxbridge digital scheme to support African and Caribbean heritage students and regional programmes such as Aim for Oxford for disadvantaged students in North East England also transferred to an online format.

“Preparations are now well underway for the 2022 admissions round with the deadline for submission of applications to Oxford being 15th October 2021. 

“We moved our interviews online in December 2020 and ensured that all shortlisted candidates had access to the technology needed to participate in their interviews. This included purchasing and distributing tablet computers where necessary. Interviews for the 2021–22 academic year will also take place online and the date of the last online Open Day this year is 17th September.

“The University, its colleges and departments consistently adjust access and outreach work to optimise the opportunities for the next generation of Oxford students. In the light of the pandemic, we are now working to help current offer-holders to prepare for their first year of University study. One aspect of this work has been to expand the online component of our Opportunity Oxford programme, so that 300 more offer-holders, whose education has been particularly affected by the pandemic, can feel more prepared for their studies and confident about starting at Oxford this autumn.

“We congratulate all incoming students on their success and thank their teachers for the professionalism and hard work.”

Exeter College first to announce all offer holders will be given a place for 2021 entry

0

Exeter is the first college to declare that they will be admitting all offer-holders this year, a practice that was used by colleges for 2020 entry. This announcement comes before other colleges have released information on this year’s admissions guidelines. 

In 2020, Exeter had initially announced that it would admit nine more students than its 2019 figures before later confirming that it would admit all UK offer holders. Last year the college had received 667 applications and admitted 104 students.

Exeter shared that they “look forward to welcoming [offer holders] in Michaelmas Term,” with the University stating that it is “delighted to celebrate the success of our offer-holders, whose places gave been confirmed today. Their achievement is all the more impressive this year, and we congratulate them and their teachers, schools and families, after a hugely challenging 18 months.”

Image: David Iliff/CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 via flickr.com

The Folk Music Revival Must Go On!

0

Folk music is one of the greatest and most diverse music genres of all time. With a presence that has hardly dwindled some hundred years after its genesis, this comes as no surprise.

Let me paint for you a dreamy picture of its humble beginnings. While the specificities of folk music’s origins remain ambiguous, we know that the story goes something like this: somewhere in a rural community in either England, Ireland or Scotland, someone picked up a fiddle and started making music. Eventually, these music makers crossed the pond and took their music to America; songs were passed down from generation to generation, old sounds delivered through new voices, each song adopting its own unique flavour.

Yet despite constant reinterpretation and rehandling by new artists, the features of folk music have always remained the same. We have never departed from those soft, hand-plucked strings, soothing monophonies (a fancy word for a single melody that is repeated throughout a song) and unembellished voices – and I don’t think we ever will. For folk music, a strong stage presence comes naturally.

This is how we have been blessed with several folk revivals over the past century and a half. The first, and perhaps the biggest, was that of the sixties and seventies. This period came with a rejection of boyish rock in favour of returning to dreamy American roots. Artists looked back to glean inspiration from musical ancestors, establishing for themselves a place in this over-crowded network of singers. Many did this by reinventing the classics in a not-so-obvious way. A perfect example of this eclectic life cycle is ‘Don’t Think Twice It’s All Right’ by Bob Dylan. His song has a rich—and somewhat convoluted—history. In true folk fashion, Dylan borrowed the melody from Paul Clayton’s ‘Who’s Gonna Buy You Ribbons (When I’m Gone)’, which acted as a renaissance of the 19th century plantation melody ‘Who’s Gon Buy You Chickens’.

But as the revival grew, people—including Bob Dylan—found the confidence to create their own sounds – staying true to the trade but not constrained by tradition. This saw the likes of Nick Drake, Joni Mitchell and John Martyn emerge from the darkness for their slice of the pie (if we’re speaking American folk, that pie would have probably been a pumpkin pie…). As for my favourite folk inventions from this great revival, I love the drunken-sounding concoction of folk and blues that John Martyn’s album Solid Air delivers so well (give it a listen; those twangy, elastic chords paired with soft strings are to die for).

This bravery to step out on their own paved the way for a re-introduction to folk music today. This time, however, there are some even greater players on the field. And by this, I am not saying that Joan Baez’s music is by any means secondary, but rather, that today’s artists take their predecessors’ progress one step further.

Today’s folk scene includes everything imaginable, from the very traditional to the newly invented subgenre. For some, folk today means honouring those songs that have existed in the folk world since the beginning of time. Consider Nora Brown – a secret star of the show. Only fifteen years old, young Nora Brown has taken the world of Appalachian folk on as her own and devoted herself to breathing new life into lost gems. During her Tiny Desk Concert, Nora does exactly this; she sings ‘Very Day I’m Gone’, a song originally written and recorded by Addie Graham but essentially non-existent on the internet – the only way to enjoy Addie Graham’s music is through the voice of a much younger artist (trust me, a few hours were spent trying to find the original but alas, as Nora promised, I found nothing).

Our Gen Z folkies have also proven that they are perfectly capable of creating their own music that still fits into the folk music rubric. Lots of artists have taken this opportunity to develop folk music into something that works for them, facing the genre with the same boldness we have harboured in this period of intense social and political change.

As a result, many subgenres have emerged and spaces have now been created for everyone – we have anti-folk for the people who don’t like folk, emo-folk for that inner 14-year-old that lives within all of us and, for all the indie girls and boys out there, I bring you indie folk.

There has been a surge in folk music’s popularity since artists like Phoebe Bridgers and Taylor Swift released albums devoted to the much-loved genre. They have proven that, while folk music is forever attached to its past, it is not incompatible with the now.

In the words of Bob Dylan, the times they are are a-changin’ and folk music hasn’t showed any signs of being left behind just yet.

So now let me do my part in passing on the folk-fired baton as I share a list of 7 songs to match every vibe:

1. ‘Very Day I’m Gone (Rambling Women)’ by Anna & Elizabeth for some great harmonies and yet another version of Addie Graham;

2. ‘Smoke Signals’ by Pheobe Bridgers for sleepy emo-folk;

3. ‘Orange Sky’ by Alexi Murdoch is an absolute must for that 00s throwback;

4. ‘Deep In Love’ by Bonny Light Horseman for something dreamy and emotional and amazing;

5. ‘I’m on Fire’ by The Staves, an oldie turned goldie from an incredibly cool trio of sisters from England;

6. ‘Carey’ by Joni Mitchell for some happy, party worthy folk music;

7. ‘Frankie and Albert’ by Nora Brown for a fun murder ballad with the banjos, American twang, and the whole shebang.

Image Credit:GPA Photo Archive/CC BY-NC-SA 2.0

“No plans” for compulsory vaccination, Oxford University says

0

Currently, there are no plans for it to be compulsory for students to be fully vaccinated when they arrive at Oxford for the start of Michaelmas term, according to an Oxford University spokesperson.

The news comes after reports that Prime Minister Boris Johnson wanted students to be fully vaccinated in order to attend lectures or stay in university residences in the autumn. The Times reported that Mr Johnson was “raging” about the relatively low uptake of COVID-19 vaccines among younger age groups compared to older ones. As of July 31st, 61.3% of 18-24 year olds have had at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine.

The proposals were condemned by the National Union of Students, who said the government was “lining students up as scapegoats for its own failings”. The Guardian also reported that universities had concerns about implementing these restrictions, such as how they would be enforced.

The Department of Education later confirmed that the government had no plans to introduce vaccine passports for students in England.

Oxford University’s webpage for returning students and offer holders says they “encourage everyone to take up the offer of a COVID-19 vaccination when eligible, ideally before arriving in Oxford at the start of the autumn (Michaelmas) term.

“All adults in the UK currently have access to a vaccine though the National Health Service – and international students are eligible to access it for free, regardless of their nationality or immigration status.”

A spokesperson for the University told Cherwell: “There are no current plans for vaccination to be compulsory at the University.”

The UK government has confirmed that proof of vaccination status will be required to enter nightclubs and other venues where large crowds gather. It is hoped that this will improve the uptake of COVID-19 vaccines among younger age groups.

The University says: “We are currently exploring options for students who have not yet been vaccinated at the start of the academic year – particularly those who live outside the UK, and further information about this will follow as soon as possible.”

Further information for offer holders and students returning to Oxford in Michaelmas term can be found here.

Image: Hello I’m Nik via unsplash.com

Dean of the Faculty of Law launches #RaceMeToo

0

CW: Racism

Mindy Chen-Wishart, Dean of the Law Faculty and Professor of Contract Law has launched the #RaceMeToo Twitter campaign. She aims to fight prejudice faced by BAME academics and students. 

Professor Chen-Wishart was born in Taiwan as one of four daughters of an Olympic gymnastics coach, and became an immigrant to New Zealand at the age of 10, before she was attracted to Oxford with a Rhodes Visiting Fellowship. But, nearly thirty years of experience at this institution and the prestigious deanship of a faculty have not prevented her from facing regular racial harassment.

Even in the last few weeks, a man subjected her and her three sons to a torrent of racist abuse in the street. Facilities management interrogated her before allowing entrance into her own office. In a reply to Cherwell, she noted an exchange with a member of facilities management who asked her “Who do you have an appointment with?”

Professor Chen-Wishart responded: “I am the Dean”. 

New to Twitter, she decided to use the platform to share some of her experiences as a BAME academic. What followed was an outpouring of support, recognition and solidarity.

Tweeting under ‘#RaceMeToo’ she and other BAME academics used the hashtag to illustrate the casual racism that they face in their everyday careers.

Similarly, a recent inquiry held by the Equality and Human Rights Commission found that a quarter of ethnic minority students had experienced racial harassment.

Responses to #RaceMeToo have ranged from shock at her experiences to solidarity from non-BAME people. But mostly, what followed was recognition. “Recognition of having experienced the same, relief that their extremely hurtful (“humiliating”) experiences were being aired and called out by someone who had ‘made it’.”   

Speaking to Cherwell,  Professor Chen-Wishart said: “We all have unconscious bias. To deny it is an oxymoron. We need to be capable of transcending our own subjectivity, to enter the world of others, and to care enough not to hurt or exclude them.” 

Beyond that, she detailed some expectations of the University:

“(i) Listen to POC. Invite them to share their experiences as students, as academics, researchers, and staff. Have a campaign.

“(ii) Signal from the top the importance of diversity and inclusion, and continue to do so. Allocate proper resources to it…

“(iii) Enhance training of support services (especially [Facilities Management] and porters) beyond the current unconscious bias and customer service, so that POC are not constantly challenged and made to feel they don’t belong. The impact can be devastating.

“(iv) Put E&D representation on the appointment panels. This is important not just for race, but for all protected characteristics.

“(v) Recognise the Cultural taxation on POC; i.e. extra work that Faculty of Colour do to serve the University’s needs for ethnic representation on committees, or to demonstrate knowledge and commitment to a cultural group, which, though it may bring accolades to the institution, is not usually rewarded by the institution on whose behalf the service was performed…

“(vi) Act: Do ask for more information, more data, more interpretation, more papers and reports. But, don’t delay acting until the never never when academics are fully satisfied they are doing the right thing.”

Professor Chen-Wishart added: “‘The opposite of love is not hate, it’s indifference’ – Elie Wiesel. This is the intangible but consequential stuff of unconscious bias. While it is no longer legal to discriminate against POC, women, disabled, and other minorities, we are often not admitted into the natural and easy social circle of belonging.”  

By using her platform to change that indifference, Professor Chen-Wishart hopes to ensure that marginalised groups will feel they belong too.

Image: Professor Chen-Wishart © Warden and Fellows of Merton College; portrait by Ander McIntyre 

Too Horny to Handle? Demonising sex on reality TV

0

Love Island has gripped the nation once more over the past month—the show that encourages hot, single and often relationship-allergic people to couple up and pretend they’re in love for a £50,000 prize. Sound like an original concept? If it does, you obviously haven’t heard of Too Hot to Handle, Netflix’s copycat reality series wherein horny contestants must abstain from sex in order to win (you guessed it) an enormous cash prize. Think of Too Hot to Handle as Love Islands terrifying ex-girlfriend—the people are fitter, the accents are international and the dystopia is played up by the presence of ‘Lana’, a creepy Alexa-like entity that controls the contestants’ sex lives.

Central to both of these shows is the assumption that abstaining from sex leads to better relationships. Although this is more overt in Too Hot to Handle, with Lana enforcing celibacy more rigidly than a headteacher at a Year 11 prom, Love Island encourages couples to wait, with all couples sleeping in the same room and only one designated ‘Hideaway’, for which a couple must be selected by their friends to enter. Those who do have sex are often demonised, most famously in the case of Zara Holland, who, after having sex with Alex Bowen in the show’s second series, faced criticism from her fellow islanders and was controversially stripped of her Miss Great Britain title.

Although things have improved in recent years, there’s still an expectation for islanders to explain themselves once they’ve had sex in the villa (particularly those who don’t go on to end up with their partners). Despite having left the show three years ago, tabloid headlines often return to Megan Barton Hanson, who had sex with two different islanders during her stint. ‘Megan Barton-Hanson reveals she has no regrets about having sex on Love Island they exclaim with constant shock, or ‘Megan Barton Hanson hopes Love Island contestants have sex’. All power to Megan for sticking to her opinions, but the fact that her quotes are dug up every year is testament to how little the disapproval towards contestants who ‘give in’ to their sex drives has abated.

So why this return to the pre-sexual-revolution idea that abstinence equals happiness? Watching Too Hot to Handle, you would think that we were living in the Victorian era rather than the sexually liberated society that many of us recognise. To a modern audience, particularly to those integrated in British universities’ inevitable hook-up culture, this outdated idea of love is at best incompatible with our society’s values and at worst dangerously misogynistic.

According to YouGov, 18-19 year olds have sex 1.8 times a week—sex is a normal part of many casual and serious relationships, and I’m not convinced that TV shows which remove or even ban sex from the dating process are helpful or at all relatable. For one, championing celibacy doesn’t make these shows less superficial, with couples still initially selecting a partner based on physical attraction. Secondly, prohibiting something only means that you want what you can’t have, and there’s a desperate air to both programmes that heighten their tension but also undermines the idea of creating ‘meaningful’ relationships.

Notably, men and women have been seen to react differently to sex being taken off the table, creating painful situations year after year. In the latest series of Too Hot to Handle, contestant Cam’s solution to his sexual frustration was masturbation, whilst his partner Emily abstained, costing him and the rest of the cast $2,000. In Love Island, it’s the infamous ‘Casa Amor’—a secondary villa that separates the boys and girls in order to tempt them with a new cast of singles—that reveals couples’ fault lines. Each year a scorned woman watches as her long-term partner (long-term in Love Island can be defined as any duration between one to several weeks) returns to the villa with a girl that they’ve known for a matter of days. It makes for a depressing viewing. Indeed, banning sex doesn’t really seem to change male contestants’ actions, but merely puts women in a vulnerable position that often ends in heartbreak, like Amy from Love Island’s fifth series.

The outcome of both experiments is also disastrous, and demonstrates pretty effectively why we no longer live in a society where sex is taboo. Both shows’ success rates are unsurprisingly low, with 10 couples still together out of Love Islands 187 contestants, and only two pairs still together from Too Hot to Handle’s latest season. Because you know what’s worse than sleeping with someone on the first date? Being forced to talk to someone you don’t really know for three weeks and convincing yourself that it’s love. Go figure.

Women have only recently been permitted to publicly enjoy sex, albeit only in progressive circles—so why are we returning to shows that take this already contentious liberty away? Although I love Love Island (and even more shamefully, Too Hot to Handle)as much as the next person, the social experiment that these shows implement should stay firmly on screen and be taken with a huge pinch of salt. An abstinence-obsessed past is something that neither TV or real life should return to.

Oxford University received £6.9m from ExxonMobil since 2015

0

An investigation from the student-run Oxford Climate Justice Campaign (OCJC) has revealed that the University of Oxford received £6.9 million from the oil and gas giant ExxonMobil since 2015. This brings the total amount of money the University has received from fossil fuel companies since 2015 to £18.8 million.

OCJC say the information had not been shared previously because the University kept “certain fossil fuel donations secret” under Section 12 of the Freedom of Information Act. OCJC have expressed concern that “it is possible that further donations from fossil fuel companies have been kept secret” using the provision which allows institutions to refuse a freedom of information request if responding would cost too much or take too much staff time to deal with. In contrast, he University of Cambridge reports all grants worth more than £50,000 and information on trust funds established by donations every year.

ExxonMobil have been accused of denying the severity of climate change, and funding climate change denial. They have also been accused of perpetuating human rights abuses. Citizens from Aceh, Indonesia, have taken ExxonMobil to court, alleging they hired and supported military forces who killed and tortured local residents during the period at which ExxonMobil carried out operations in the area.

Carbon Tracker ranked ExxonMobil as having the least ambitious commitments to combat climate change out of all major fossil fuel companies.

Donations received by the University from ExxonMobil since 2015 include £4.4 million towards research into anti-malarial resistance at the University’s Centre for Vaccinology and Tropical Medicine. ExxonMobil also donated £231,869 to the Saïd Business School, which hosted the Oxford Citizen Climate Assembly.

The Saïd Business School confirmed to Cherwell that they had received donations from ExxonMobil between 2013 and 2015. The money was spent on “research into women’s global economic opportunities and effective methods of financial empowerment and autonomy”.

“Since it was a philanthropic donation, the research was conducted independently. ExxonMobil and the other funders had no influence whatsoever on the research or findings,” a spokesperson added.

OCJC said: “These further revelations are shocking and disappointing. They demonstrate just how entwined the fossil fuel industry is in Oxford’s institutions and establishment. We are concerned that the concealment around ExxonMobil may suggest that much more information regarding Oxford’s ties to the fossil fuel industry may still be hidden.

“By recklessly carrying out research on behalf of the fossil fuel industry, and by accepting donations from fossil fuel companies, Oxford continues to provide fossil fuel companies with a social licence to continue to destroy the planet and perpetuate injustice. Oxford must cut its ties to the fossil fuel industry immediately.”

OCJC are also demanding that the Committee to Review Donations and Research Funding develops a policy to ban donations and research funding from fossil fuel companies, incline with existing policies towards tobacco companies.

Associate Professor in Human Geography at the University of Oxford, Amber Murrey, said: “The Oxford Climate Justice Campaign has documented prolonged and alarming patterns of mutual support between the extractive industry and the University. It demands that we have open conversations about the ethics and socio-environmental consequences of fossil fuel extraction and should trigger action by University leadership.”

A spokesperson for ExxonMobil told Cherwell: “The ExxonMobil Foundation supported a range of highly regarded programmes at Oxford, from scholarships to help train future health leaders from developing countries, through a one-year Master of Science degree with a strong focus on global public health threats including malaria, HIV/AIDS and tuberculosis, to research devoted to encouraging the economic empowerment of women through entrepreneurship. These were longstanding, very public philanthropic programmes that provided and continue to provide considerable benefit in developing countries.”

Regarding accusations that the company had denied the severity of climate change, and had funded climate change denial, ExxonMobil told Cherwell: “Allegations about the company’s climate research are inaccurate and misleading.

“ExxonMobil supports the Paris Climate Agreement, and is playing a constructive role in developing solutions. Since 2000, we’ve invested more than $10 billion to research, develop and deploy lower-emission energy technologies. This includes pioneering research in advanced carbon capture and storage, cogeneration, methane emissions reduction and algae-based biofuels. We also advocate for sound public policy that can help facilitate advances in technology, such as putting a price on carbon.  More information is available on our website and on Energy Factor.”

An Oxford University spokesperson told Cherwell: “The University of Oxford safeguards the independence of its teaching and research programmes, regardless of the nature of their funding. Those donating money or sponsoring programmes at the University have no influence over how academics carry out their research or what conclusions they reach. Researchers publish the results of their work whether the results are seen to be critical or favourable by industry or governments.

“Our partnerships with industry allow the University to apply its knowledge to real challenges of pressing global concern, with funding often going directly into research into climate-related issues and renewables. None of the philanthropic funding highlighted by OCJC has gone into extraction and exploration research. Rather, it has been used to widen access to education and to fund scholarships, academic posts and capital costs. The proportion of research funding going into fossil fuel exploration and extraction has declined significantly over the last decade, whilst the percentage going into renewables projects has increased.”

Image: Roy Luck/CC BY 2.0 via flickr.com

License to Grill

0

As the plant based revolution continues, the most recent cuisine to be veganised is an eagerly awaited summer highlight that makes for a perfect social event. Whether it’s at a park, on a beach, or even on a college-provided grill, there’s nothing like watching sizzling coals of the barbecue in the warm sunshine (safely, of course). Move over meat eaters, because this summer, vegetarians and vegans have a license to grill.

Meat has long hogged the barbecue, with the slow cooking tradition holding great significance to the African-American community (highlighted in the recent Netflix show “High on the Hog”), and many other countries have their own versions of open fire cooking – think tandoori, Mexican grill, or kebabs. While grilled meat has long been appreciated by people around the globe, the growing popularity of meat replacements is reflected in UK supermarkets. Tesco’s “Wicked” brand recently launched vegan skewers, made with pea protein, as have the expanding “THIS” range, and with vegan halloumi and burger alternatives on offer too, you can be sure that there’ll be no more plates piled high with salad for non-meat eaters. 

That’s not to say that salads, or any vegetables, need be neglected this summer: MOB Kitchen’s Peri Peri Sweet Potato salad is a perfect example of a spruced up, flavourful side dish. With roasted sweet potatoes with a herby kick, fresh celery, peppers, sweetcorn, tomato and coriander, this salad is balanced and will definitely complement a PB-BBQ. A grilled peach salad with crumbly cheese and rocket, or something more citrussy can be a great way to add acidity, sweetness, or some of your 5 a day into a barbecue too. You can even spice up a corn on the cob with Peri Peri seasoning, or make a “Masala Corn” in the style of Indian street food, with butter (or alternative), chilli powder, honey and lemon juice. 

Homemade vegetable skewers are a classic, but can seem bland or boring if they’re not done right. Seasoning your veggies with olive oil, salt and pepper before they hit the coals is imperative – and mix up the flavours too! Try oregano and lemon juice on diced aubergines, courgettes and peppers for a Mediterranean skewer, or slather miso paste on slices of onion for an Ottolenghi-inspired umami sensation. Add cayenne or chilli powder for a bit of spiciness, with an extra squeeze of lemon once they’re cooked to give the spices a facelift.

Marinating might seem like a lot of effort with little reward, but it can actually reduce the amount of work you have to do once the grill or barbeque is on. For vegetarians, this is the trick you need for soft and delicious paneer tikka, and can be replicated with tofu. Marinades are essentially layers of flavour, they need at least 6 hours in the fridge to sink in so that delicate spices aren’t overpowered by smokiness from the grill. 

A popular marinade in North India is Hariyali – literally meaning ‘green’, because of the fresh herbs it includes. Start by cubing 400g of your paneer or tofu, then add 4 tbsp of ginger and garlic paste, followed by 2 tsp of turmeric powder – this is the first marinade. Cover this, and let it sit for 10 minutes. Then add the juice of one lime, and let it sit for another 10 minutes. In this time, use a blender to prepare the third marinade, consisting of 2 handfuls of cashew nuts, 6 tbsp of plain yoghurt (dairy free is fine!), 1 cup each of fresh mint and coriander, 2 tsp of cumin seeds or powder, 1 tsp cinnamon, 1 tbsp poppy seeds, a few cardamoms and chillies, plus a pinch salt and pepper. Feel free to taste the marinade to check if it needs adjusting – it should be fairly hot.  Finally, add the thoroughly blended bright green mix to your paneer or tofu, before refrigerating it for at least 6 hours. This marinade will be worth the effort when you taste the flavour it imparts!

Lots of the new veggie and vegan options for a barbecue are sure to be popular with meat eaters too, but if you’re someone whose diet has long been ignored at these summer celebrations, this year might just be your chance to hog the best options on the grill.

Published in print on 09/06/2021

The Return of Formals

0

For many colleges, formals are finally back on the menu. Whether that means donning your gown for the first time in a year, or a more relaxed opportunity to enjoy hall food without plastic screens muting any hopes of a conversation, the return to inside dining has been much awaited by many. For many freshers, this term offers the prospect of their first formals ever – and with it, the promise of a normal student experience, though it may well feel overdue. So, although some college chefs have kept us entertained over lockdowns with Instagram posts and student-friendly recipes, their time has come to shine and plate up Masterchef-worthy creations for halls filled with hungry students who have been eagerly waiting for their chance to be a food critic.

Last Friday, I attended my college’s first formal of Trinity and was overwhelmed with nostalgia as I filed into the hall with the 49 other lucky ticket holders. I felt as though I’d won a golden ticket, though I’d have to wait until dessert for a taste of dreamy chocolate. The familiar sight of candlesticks sitting side by side with the cheapest bottles of Pinot Grigio made me grin from ear to ear; after a long stretch of unfulfilling student experience, going back to normal is like clouds parting to reveal sunshine. Even given the variance in hall food prices, it does feel like a real privilege that a hallmark of the Oxford experience is a three-course meal for about a fiver – impossible to forget as I marvelled at the starter of whipped goats cheese, beetroot, and pickled fennel salad, served with the well-loved bread and butter and a slice of toasted ciabatta.

For mains, the omnivores among us were served a slow cooked lamb shank, tender enough to slide off the bone, while vegetarians such as myself received an eggplant steak with a scored king oyster mushroom. I particularly loved the use of mushroom on the aubergine, it lent it an umami earthiness and slightly beefy flavour to the otherwise wholly vegetable based dish. Served with crushed new potatoes, seasonal veg and herby jus, both of these options were really popular- the food lived up to the high standards we had set for our first formal back in college. In the last few years, many restaurants and takeaways have upped their veggie and vegan game as a result of skyrocketing demand for plant-based alternatives. This trend seems to have extended to college kitchens too, as this was undoubtedly the best vegetarian (and vegan friendly) meal I’ve been served in hall. Each dish had an almost identical vegan counterpart, so rejoice vegans, at the end of boring salads and fruit plates!

As someone with a certified sweet tooth, I’d been looking forward to the dessert from the moment I walked into the hall – although I cook a fair amount of my own food, the precision and luxury of formal hall desserts remain firmly out of my territory, and always feel like a real treat. We were served a blackcurrant and raspberry chocolate bar, filled with mousse, alongside a scoop of fresh raspberry sorbet. The perfect combination of sweetness and tartness rounded off my first formal of Trinity term and reminded me of all the good yet to come, despite the sour bits of the pandemic we’re all keen to leave behind.

All in all, my first formal of 2021 was a great experience, leaving me feeling grateful to have been back in hall surrounded by friends, and far from the desk at which I ate most of my meals during virtual Trinity. The menu was thoughtfully curated, making use of seasonal and local produce, and it was clear that the vegetarian and vegan alternatives were given just as much consideration. I’ll definitely be trying to grab a ticket for the next formal at my college – and I’d recommend you do the same!

Published in print on 26/05/2021

Hanging by a Thread: Fragility and Femininity in the Work of Nensi Dojaka and Rui

0

The LVMH Prize for Young Fashion Designers was launched in 2013 with the aim of seeking out and fostering emerging talent within the fashion world. Each year, the winner receives  €300,000 and mentorship from LVMH and the runner-up (or winner of the Karl Lagerfeld/Special Jury Prize) also benefits from this mentorship, as well as a grant of €150,000. With this incomparable support, winners consistently graduate from the realm of ‘up-and-coming’ to fully established and revered designers. This is evidenced in the success of past winners such as Jacquemus and Marques’Almeida which now have their shows sandwiched between century-old houses at fashion week.

Before the winners are announced, however, a short-list of finalists is released. Within the group of the 2021 finalists, we find Nensi Dojaka and RUI. Nensi Dojaka is a designer from Albania and based in London. Having graduated from Central Saint Martins, she was swept up by Ssense, producing a capsule collection with them in 2019. She has recently finished a stint with the so-called ‘talent incubator’ Fashion East. Rui Zhou, the designer behind the eponymous brand RUI, describes herself as from “a small city surrounded by mountains and trees in China”. She now works in Shanghai, having studied at the Tsinghua University, Beijing and Parsons, New York. Although the background and education of these two designers are contrasting, their works similarly challenge the rules of womenswear and create new definitions of femininity.

Speaking to the LVMH panel, Rui described the aesthetic of her brand as “based on the relationship in between fragility and strength” and this definition could equally be applied to Nensi Dojaka’s work. In the latter’s garments, this fragility is created by the straps which hold the pieces together. The concept of the strappy little black dress is taken to its extreme, as she criss-crosses thread-like straps (too slight to be called ‘spaghetti’) which precariously hold up the main body of the item. From this precariousness arises a provocativeness as it seems that the garment could snap at any moment. As the wearer can be confident that the structure of the item is not as delicate as it appears, this endows them with a secret strength which raises them above any viewer who dares to think that they will see more. This effect is also achieved by Rui’s pieces which consist of star-like panels of fabric held together by tenuous links adorned with crystals or beads. The placement of this adornment visually symbolises the beauty of this fragility, but also physically strengthens the most delicate parts of the garment, thus representing the designer’s vision of fragility and strength existing in harmony.

The shapes which arise from the structure of these pieces hint towards a playfulness within this new vision of femininity and this partly derives from the use of asymmetry in the work of both these designers. In some of Nensi Dojaka’s most recognisable pieces, she connects the straps in such a way that the panels of fabric sit at wonky angles. This adds to the provocative nature of the garment through making the function of the structure seem even more miraculous. In other pieces, she stays strictly symmetrical, but a playfulness is maintained through intricate layering. For example, in one of her bodysuits, three layers of sheer fabric are placed on top of each other to form a bra. As the transparency of this fabric is lost through this layering, an element of modesty is born out of the sensuality and this ties into the symbiosis of fragility and strength.

Rui Zhao similarly experiments with symmetry and asymmetry. In the symmetrical pieces, the shapes that are formed in the negative space of the fabric are perfectly circular, making the overall effect rather cute and fun, contrasting with the severity of the geometry in Nensi Dojaka. In others, spiky and asymmetric layers are chaotically intertwined as if the wearer has accidentally become tangled in a cobweb. As well as showing playfulness and experimentation, the construction of these shapes is a testament to the technical prowess of these designers.

It is easy to get wrapped up in the fragile technicality of these pieces, but one must remember that they are made to be worn. Nensi Dojaka and Rui Zhao did not forget this. Their radical femininity is reflected in the way that their clothes accentuate the body, wrapping themselves around the curves and contours of the figure. This flattering fit was not accidental and it is clear that the designs were created for real bodies rather than coat hangers. Nensi Dojaka uses adjustable straps which allow you to precisely fit the item exactly how you desire. Whereas adjusting the straps on a normal piece of clothing would change how high or low the garment fits on your body, the sheer number of adjustable straps on each item means that you can transform its whole appearance through playing with the endless permutations. Rather than using adjusting devices like Nensi Dojaka, the materials used for the RUI collections are inherently adjustable. This is because they are extremely stretchy, meaning that they change shape to fit whichever body they wrap themselves around. This is evidenced through the range of the bodies used in their campaigns which in itself points to an inclusivity in this femininity – it is not limited by the boundaries of gender or size, but willing to be embraced by all. The downside to these wonderfully stretchy fabrics is that they are thoroughly unsustainable (polyamide, nylon, spandex etc.), but Rui Zhou reassures the LVMH judges that sustainability is something she would focus on if she won the prize.

Unsurprisingly, I am not the only one who is obsessed with this new style of feminine dressing. It only takes a scroll down the Instagram accounts of these designers (@ruiofficial.me and  @nensidojaka) to see that celebrities have been lapping up their striking pieces. Emily Ratajkowski was recently pictured in a signature-style Nensi Dojaka minidress and other big names such as Bella Hadid, Emma Corrin had come before her. For her Rolling Stones cover, Dua Lipa was pictured in a RUI bodysuit, leggings and gloves and even the insta-famous ‘robot’ @lilmiquela has had a RUI top superimposed on her CGI body. When a robot is sporting your work, it surely means that you have captured the zeitgeist. This celebrity popularity does, however, betray a lack of accessibility to these clothes. RUI’s prices start at £180, and that is just for a single sleeve and the cult minidresses of Nensi Dojaka cost around the £800.  Perhaps this is reflective of where the designers are in their careers. Having won the LVMH prize, Grace Wales Bonner collaborated with Adidas allowing her to reach a different audience outside of the sphere of high-fashion and I wonder whether RUI and Nensi Dojaka could follow a similar trajectory. For the moment, we may just have to admire these clothes from a distance like works of art. Even if we cannot wear them ourselves, they are still able challenge our understanding of femininity and inspire us to find strength in fragility and to dress to reflect this.