Saturday, May 10, 2025
Blog Page 357

BREAKING: University announces further information about this year’s exams

0

The University has announced the launch of its new exams platform in collaboration with Inspera Assessment, a European e-assessment provider, which will be available to demo from late February. More detailed information about this term’s academic provision has also been released, including the announcement that those taking exams this term will be expected to take the same number of papers and assessments as usual, unless this was previously confirmed to change (as is the case with Classics Moderations).

The exams platform will be available for use from Trinity, while all exams scheduled to take place this term will happen in Weblearn. The new platform, which has been in use by the Medical Sciences Division since 2018, will feature 3 specific modes for typed, handwritten, and mixed exams. Students completing handwritten or mixed mode exams will be given 30 minutes of technical time to scan and upload their exam material. 

Students normally entitled to 25% extra time for exams will be given an additional hour to complete their exams in Inspera, and any students entitled to more than 25% extra time will by default be given an exam duration of 8 hours. Courses that already have longer online exams, such as some English exams, will not generally be giving additional time. Further details for international students will be released later in February, but the university has announced that students in different time zones should be able to complete their exams in daytime hours.

The new academic provisions information summarises some of the details previously released by the university, including encouraging students to keep a record of disruption faced if they wish to apply for Mitigating Circumstances. The provisions also confirm that most students can expect entirely online teaching for the start of Hilary term, with the exception of some research students. All exams scheduled to take place in Hilary will be online, with the exception of one medical exam. 

Dissertations and project work will be adapted for the context so that they maintain “the same intellectual rigour,” and the university has acknowledged that some projects may have to be designed, or redesigned, in order to account for the inaccessibility of some resources. Placements and year abroad projects will continue to go ahead with increased consideration of risk, although the university has noted that students “will not be required to take up a year abroad or other placement against their wishes.”

Charity choir performs for Oxford care home

0

Marston Court, an Oxford care home, has received a performance of ‘Somewhere Over the Rainbow’ from Sweet Charity Choir and a £250 donation from the organisation’s supporters. 

The performance, in a pre-recorded video which opens with members singing and communicating in sign-language, was dedicated to Marston Care Home and Deaf-SELF, a London-based charity.

Members of the Sweet Charity Choir choose causes to support every month, with a mission to boost community spirit through their music. This performance was nominated by singer Kym Mason, sister of the home’s Activities Coordinator, Penny Jenner. 

Jenner, writing on the care home’s website, believes recordings such as this are “invaluable to keep spirits up in such difficult times” and said that the “donation will enable us to book some of our regular entertainers to perform via zoom for residents, keeping them in work and us entertained. It’s a win, win!”

The performance had a profound emotional effect on residents of the care home, with manager Sharon Fenn reporting that “there wasn’t a dry eye in the house” following the video. The charity aimed to anticipate “bright and cheerful years to come” through the song, originally written in 1939 and sung by Judy Garland.

The choir’s moving video provided entertainment to a care home that would usually be attended by local performers. However, due to coronavirus restrictions such events are currently impossible. 

Care homes across the UK have been badly hit by the Covid-19 crisis, experiencing deadly outbreaks of the virus. The government has tried to tackle this by aiming to offer all older residents a coronavirus vaccine by 15th February, in an attempt to restore future normality to care homes. It is hoped they will one day once again be able to receive performances, like that of Sweet Charity Choir’s, in-person.

A video of the performance can be found on YouTube and the choir’s Facebook page. 

Sweet Charity Choir was approached for comment.

Image: stevepb via pixabay.com

Oxford research shows ancient bonds between dogs and humans

0

New research has revealed that dogs travelled alongside the first humans who journeyed to the Americas. A team of international geneticists and archaeologists, which includes Oxford University’s Professor Greger Larson, have discovered that dogs arrived with the first European settlers around 23,000 years ago. These dogs developed over generations to become genetically distinct from their European counterparts.  

The study concluded that “the first people to enter the Americas likely did so with their dogs. The subsequent geographic dispersal and genetic divergences within each population suggest that where people went, dogs went too.”

“The convergence of the early genetic histories of people and dogs in Siberia and Beringia suggests that this may be the region where humans and wolves first entered into a domestic relationship.” 

Researchers have also found that the bond between humans and dogs goes back much further than previously thought. The study concluded that the partnership began somewhere between 26,000 and 19,000 years ago – around 11,000 years earlier than previous archaeological evidence had suggested.  

The study went on to note the possibilities for future research: “since their emergence from wolves, dogs have played a wide variety of roles within human societies, many of which are specifically tied to the lifeways of cultures worldwide. Future archaeological research combined with numerous scientific techniques, will no doubt reveal how the emerging mutual relationship between people and dogs led to their successful dispersal across the globe.” 

Speaking to the Oxford Arts Blog, Professor Larson, the Oxford researcher involved in the project, said: “we knew dogs were the oldest domesticated species, and these findings now suggest that the initial process of domestication began around 23,000 years ago in north-east Siberia. From there, people and dogs moved together east into the Americas, south towards east Asia, and west towards Europe and Africa.” 

He also pointed to the biological links between the ancient European and American dogs: “we found a very strong correlation between the pattern of ancient dogs’ genetic diversification and the genetic signatures of early Americans. The similarities between the two species is striking and suggests the shared pattern is not a coincidence.” 

Today, few traces of the ancient American dogs remain. When later waves of Europeans arrived with their own canines, the indigenous dogs were almost completely wiped out. This means researchers are reliant on a variety of scientific techniques to reconstruct the biology of these ancient creatures. 

Professor Larson has been involved in previous projects investigating prehistoric pooches, including the existence of the ancient dire wolves, which featured in the popular TV series Game of Thrones. Asked about this preoccupation, he responded: “I grew up with dogs, and I always interact with them when they walk by.”

“Dogs were the first species to enter into a mutualistic relationship with us. It was a key shift in the evolution of our species…It is amazing how much everything began to change after that. 

“For the vast majority of our species’ history we travelled alone and made a tiny impression on the earth’s ecology. Now there are eight billion of us and we depend on a range of domestic plants and animals for the maintenance of our huge global population. Imagine what society would be like if we had not formed mutually interdependent relationships with so many other domestic plants and animals. And it all started with dogs.”

Oxford residents reminded not to let their guard down as COVID cases remain high

0

Despite a slight decline in the spread of COVID-19 within Oxfordshire, infection rates are still higher than they were in December.

According to figures published by Oxford City Council, for the week ending 22 January, 294.7 cases per 100,000 people were identified in Oxfordshire. This is a decline from 399.5 the previous week. However, this still exceeds the figure of 83.7 per 100,000 on 4 December by more than three times.

“The latest covid figures for Oxford are reducing, but are still higher than when we went into lockdown. It’s really important that everyone, even those who have had the vaccine, sticks to the lockdown rules to keep figures falling,” Councillor Louise Upton, Cabinet Member for Safer, Healthy Oxford said in a press release on the Oxford City Council website. 

While acknowledging the progress of the vaccination programme, Val Messenger, the Deputy Director for Public Health of Oxfordshire County Council, reiterated the importance of abiding by the lockdown restrictions, including for those who have been vaccinated. 

“The vaccination programme continues to make excellent progress in Oxfordshire, and we are on track on schedule [sic] to achieve the government target of the top four priority groups being vaccinated by mid-February.

“However, we must remember that those who have been vaccinated will not have full protection until at least three weeks after they have received their second dose. Moreover, those who have received the vaccine could still pass on the virus to others. So we can’t afford to let our guard down,” Messenger said in a statement published on the Oxford City Council website.

As an additional measure in the fight against COVID-19, community testing will also be introduced in Oxfordshire in early February. “It will allow us to better identify asymptomatic carriers of COVID-19, and so help us more effectively control the virus and stop the spread,” Messenger added.

In the 7 days leading up to 26 January, 229.2 per 100,000 people in Oxfordshire tested positive for coronavirus, according to official UK government data. This is slightly below the national rate of 273.3 within the same period.

Axe-throwing bar to open in Oxford despite safety concerns

0

Axe-throwing will be on the menu at a bar granted license to open in Oxford, despite concerns from police. 

Oxford City Council unanimously granted Boom: Battle Bar’s application to open a branch in Oxford’s Castle Quarter permission, despite concerns over safety.

Thames Valley Police have also suggested the bar could increase alcohol-related crime and disorder to the area. Inspector James Sullivan asked for the council to turn down the licence application, or to approve firmer safety restrictions on the bar.

Oxford City Councillor Michael Gotch said he had been “rather horrified” on reading police evidence that suggested customers might be searched when leaving to prevent people smuggling blades out of the premises.

However, CEO and founder of Boom: Battle Bar Elliot Shuttleworth said that customers would be escorted at all times, and that weapons would be locked away afterwards. The Boom: Battle Bar website also suggests that each 45 minute session will be led by a “specialised instructor”.

Axe-throwing will be just one of many activities available at the 250-capacity bar. Crazy golf, electric darts and shuffle ball are among other activities offered at existing Boom: Battle Bar sites. Hammerschlaagen, a Bavarian game involving knocking nails into a tree stump with a hammer will also be served up. With axes, darts and hammers involved, some have raised concerns over alcohol consumption at this site.

Despite the beer-pong inspired activity the bar also offers, as well as the pints and cocktails it sells, representatives of the company emphasised that selling alcohol was a ‘secondary element’ of the business, and that it was not a “drinks-led business”. 

For participation in axe-throwing the Boom: Battle Bar’s website also asks customers that “no alcohol… be consumed beforehand please”, and alcohol during the axe-throwing session is prohibited. 

Alan Cook, UK head of operations at Boom: Battle Bar has also said that the bar’s target audience spends most of their money on games instead of alcohol, and that the bar attracts “the under 35s” who “don’t drink anymore”.

The council will insist on high-visibility jackets and body-worn cameras for security staff.

Norfolk Police told Cherwell that no incidents had been reported at Boom: Battle Bar’s Norwich branch because the bar was given licence to open on March 26th 2020, after the first national lockdown was imposed. “Due to COVID-19, the bar has not been able to operate properly and there have been no reported incidents relating to the Axe.

“A safety concern was raised by our Licensing Team and was assured a risk assessment would be in place. Once the bar is able to re-open, the Licensing Officer will be contacting the Norwich City Council Health & Safety Team to follow this up.”

Boom: Battle Bar, and South Wales Police have been approached for comment.

Image: Kurt Kaiser/CC0 1.0 via Wikimedia Commons

Oxford study estimates over 60,000 excess deaths during pandemic

0

A recently published study by Oxford’s Leverhulme Centre for Demographic Science has estimated that there were 62,750 excess deaths from all causes in 2020 resulting in a reduction in life expectancy for both men and women by over one year. 

The study, which looks at the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on mortality trends, reported an increase of 15.1% in the number of deaths compared with the expected level for 2020. The researchers described England and Wales as the “worst performers in terms of excess deaths”. It also reveals that despite woman making up a larger proportion of the older population, excess deaths were higher among men, accounting for 55.4% of the total. It is estimated that the 15-44-year-old age group accounted for only 6.2% of the excess deaths while the mortality rate among those under 15 years was not higher than expected. 

The demographic experts found that a number of fatalities in the first 47 weeks of the year may have been wrongly classified as deaths directly linking to Covid-19 and points to deaths indirectly linked to Covid-19 as a cause for the overall increase in the death rate when compared with data from the past ten years. The researchers claimed that the strain on the health system and the fear of contracting the virus deterred many people suffering from severe illnesses from seeking medical attention.

Ridhi Kashyap, one the study’s authors and Associate Professor of Social Demography at Nuffield College, said that “our research provides further understanding of the tragic impact of the pandemic in England and Wales,” adding that “the magnitude of these losses in life expectancy…is truly unprecedented.’

Analysing data from March until November 20, the demographers claimed that life expectancy reduced by what the researchers described as a ‘staggering’ rate. The reduction of life expectancy by 0.9 years for women and 1.2 years for men marks 2020 as the first year in over a decade in which life expectancy has not increased significantly, regressing to 2010 levels. 

Due to the surge in cases throughout late November and December, the researchers now estimate that life expectancy may have dropped to -1.0 years for women and -1.3 for men. 

The research paper sheds further light on the burden of Covid-19 in England and Wales and the wider impact of the pandemic on mortality trends. The study concluded that “Whether mortality will return to—or even fall below—the baseline level remains to be seen as the pandemic continues to unfold and diverse interventions are put in place.” 

Image: Olga Kononenko via unsplash.com

74% of Europeans think EU is not worth having without free movement according to Oxford survey

0

In a poll conducted in December 2020 as part of Oxford University’s Europe Stories research project, 74% of participants said the European Union would ‘not be worth having’ without freedom of movement.

The poll, a collaboration with eupinions – which collects and analyses data on the European public’s views on current affairs – invited participants to respond to the following statement: “If it did not offer the freedom to travel, work, study and live in other EU member states, the European Union would not be worth having.” 

All 27 EU member states were polled, as well as the UK, with participants choosing whether to strongly agree, somewhat agree, somewhat disagree or strongly disagree with the statement.

The researchers found that while responses to this question were similar across demographic groups, there was some difference between countries, with those in Poland most likely to disagree with the statement. 

The importance of freedom of movement to Europeans was further discovered when participants were asked, “What are the most important things the EU has done for you?”. The report found that freedom to travel was in the top three for 61%; opportunities to live, work and study in Europe for 53%; and peace and external security for 38%. 

The results suggest continuity in public opinion since a 2018 Eurobarometer poll, which found four in five Europeans were supportive of free movement in the EU.

Among other findings of the poll was a preference for outcomes rather than for political process. 59% agreed that “as long as the EU delivers effective action, the presence or absence of the European Parliament is of secondary importance”. Notably, three in five of those who previously agreed that it was important to have a European Parliament also agreed with the above statement. This suggests that even for those who believe in the importance of a European Parliament, the effectiveness of its policymaking is still more important than just its existence.

The results of the poll come amidst EU freedom of movement restrictions due to the Covid-19 pandemic and as a result of Brexit. The UK left the EU on the 1st January 2021 and also signed the Immigration Act on the 11th November 2020, ending freedom of movement for EU citizens within the UK from the 31st December 2020. 

The research project was led by Professor Timothy Garton Ash, who is Professor of European Studies at Oxford, and Isaiah Berlin Professorial Fellow at St. Antony’s College. Professor Garton Ash said, “The irony is not lost on us, that this freedom is precisely what most British citizens have just lost following the UK’s departure from the EU.” 

University failed to phone all students who tested positive

0

Oxford University’s coronavirus Early Alert System (EAS) was unable to telephone all students who tested positive in Michaelmas term after a spike in demand, recently released meeting minutes reveal. 

Notes from the University’s Bronze planning group on the 19th October show that the service experienced “an increase in positive cases”, which meant that “EAS Results Liaison Team (RLT) did not have capacity to make phone calls to the individual students testing positive”. However, students who tested positive were still contacted by email to inform them of their result. 

The minutes go on to note that “colleges were concerned that SPOCs (single points of contact), who are not medical professionals, were having to advise students” as a result of the lack of staffing capacity. At that time, “the Group noted that the issue was being reviewed.” 

In response to the allegations, the University’s Early Alert System said “there were no unexpected staffing shortages in the EAS Results Liaison Team last term – the issue encountered was an unexpectedly high level of positive test results for a short period at the peak of the infection curve. Students are always notified of test results by automated messages as soon as results come through. 

“Colleges provide the first line of support for students, and colleges are supported by the Results Liaison Team which is staffed by experienced health professionals. This system works well as it combines infection control support from the Results Liaison Team with the on the ground knowledge and support which colleges can give. Students will be contacted and supported by a variety of staff depending on their particular circumstances”. 

Notes from a subsequent meeting of the Bronze group on the 28th October reveal that the service had “a reliance on external temporary agencies to supply nursing staff” to ensure demand for medical professionals was met. The group noted that “a range of options are being considered for the service and requirements for recruitment are being developed”. 

The service has since confirmed that “the University continues to use agency nurses to staff the EAS testing pods, which is a practical solution given the on-going variation in numbers of tests required depending on infection/symptom levels”. 

The EAS also refused to specify who the services had been contracted to, saying that “a number of agencies” were used to fill the staffing shortage and that this was “funded by the central university”. There is currently no information regarding the cost to the university.

Asked about the quality of service during Michaelmas Term, the EAS say they believe that the system was “excellent” and that “colleges and departments have indicated that they have found, and continue to find, the speed of testing and the support offered by the Result Liaison Team to be invaluable”.

“Due to the fast changing and unpredictable environment of the Coronavirus pandemic there will inevitably be peaks and troughs in demand for EAS, but the service is prepared to deal with these fluctuations through having a highly committed team, strong university support and growing experience of managing covid cases across the collegiate University”. 

The university’s Early Alert System website currently reads: “remember the University has finite testing capacity, so it is important that we target it where it is most needed. You should only book a test if you have any of the primary symptoms of COVID-19 (fever, persistent cough, loss of taste or smell) or if you have other new symptoms that you suspect may be caused by COVID-19.  

“Please do not book a test unless you have symptoms or have been instructed to do so by public health authorities.” 

“We’re going into a new territory”: interviewing theatre director Sally Cookson

0

Sally Cookson is a theatre director who has worked on productions for theatres including the Old Vic London, the Bristol Old Vic, the National Theatre, the Duke of York’s and the Rose Theatre Kingston. Most recently she has directed A Monster Calls at The Old Vic, The Lion, The Witch & The Wardrobe at The Bridge Theatre, and Peter Pan at the National Theatre. The Guardian hailed her production of Jane Eyre as a “bold, tumultuous reimagining” and a “feast for the senses” in its five-star review.

When did you decide that you wanted to pursue a career as a director? 

I never thought about being a theatre director, I was always passionate about wanting to be an actor. That was my path. I absolutely loathed school and I ended up in a youth theatre which turned the lightbulb on and made me realise that there was another way of thinking about the world. Then my mum pulled me out of school and sent me to a sixth form college which has an amazing drama department. That’s where my passion really ignited. I went to LAMDA drama school and then was an actor for about 10 years. When I was about 30 I got a job at the Bristol Old Vic for 8 months with an ensemble company that the artistic director Andy Hay was setting up. I went to Bristol, a bit disillusioned with the acting profession by then because I’d been doing it for 10 years and had realised that I wasn’t getting the parts that I really wanted to play. It wasn’t to do with wanting to play massive, great big parts, it was about wanting to play interesting parts. The work was unsatisfying. When I got to Bristol I realised that I loved working as part of an ensemble and getting to know how the theatre worked and being part of the different departments. We did a lot of outreach work. At the end of the 8 months some of the funding for the education department was taken away and the theatre was in crisis. The whole education department was removed from the building. I was so upset by it, it had such a devastating impact on young people and the community in Bristol that a friend of mine who had been an actor in the ensemble with me, we decided to set up a small summer course of 25 people to continue the work that we thought was important. It was so incredibly enriching that I knew then it was something I wanted to pursue and that’s how I realised directing was something that I was interested in.

What were the female roles like during your career as an actor? 

It started off alright, I played Juliet very early on in my career and Hedvig in The Wild Duck at the Royal Exchange so I played a few nice roles in my early twenties and then it all started to get boring. I was always playing the young, boring, passive ingenue who has no agency and is only there as a love interest. I must have played about five of those. Every rehearsal experience was exactly the same. Run by all male directors, mostly all male writers and it just felt like I wasn’t being stimulated in any way or using my brain. I was just wheeled on in a pretty dress and I just thought “I don’t want to be stuck in this for the rest of my life”. In the plays that were being put on, there were three women to every ten male parts. It was much harder to get a job and it was frustrating. Sadly we just accepted it, but I wasn’t prepared to continue in that way. I didn’t want to remain in an industry that saw women like that. I wanted to have a more interesting career. 

Do you think a lot of your experiences as an actor has informed the way that you direct? 

It’s very important to the work I make. It has informed every aspect of how I am as a director, including the experience of having worked with a pretty sadistic male bully. I’ve worked with a lot of lovely male directors, but I did have one extremely difficult experience in my early career. It was so demoralising and humiliating that when I became a director I vowed that my rehearsal room would be the opposite of how he ran his rehearsal room. 

Do you think it’s difficult being a woman in the theatre industry? 

As an actor I found it extremely challenging and didn’t like how it made me feel. As a director my experience has been very different. Maybe because I didn’t go into directing until I was a bit older. I didn’t become a freelance director until I was in my late thirties and I knew what I wanted to do, so I had a bit more agency in myself at that age. I was very lucky because when I became a freelance director I worked for a fantastic company for 10 years called Travelling Light which was run by women. The artistic producer, the chief executive, the production manager were all female so that felt fantastic and the way they ran the company which was not ego-led. It was very much about the work and collaboration and connection with the audience, so I learnt a lot about how I like to work through that company. But I see the struggle for young emerging artists and when you look around at what’s happening in the profession now, the imbalance and the gender disparity is shocking. I still think that there are still more male playwrights and I think that without thinking they write plays for themselves.

Do you see the gender disparity in theatre has changed in recent years? 

I think there has been a shift. I think the National Theatre Artistic Director Rufus Norris is very aware of that and is working really hard to make sure that there is quality. It feels like right now people are letting it slip. People think there’s not a problem with gender anymore, that we’ll go back to how we did things before. Especially with covid, I’m wondering whether that’s affecting how people think and not wanting to take risks, and I think sometimes female playwrights and female directors are still considered risky. I do think there’s an underlying misogyny in the profession that we constantly need to challenge and not take our feet off the pedal.

What advice would you give to someone hoping to make a start in the theatre industry? 

I think talking to people, trying to get advice, help, and opportunities will help. You’ve just got to keep knocking on that door. You’ve got to be really bold, more so than you used to be, at phoning people up, emailing people, badgering people. I still have that self doubt of “are you good enough to be doing that?” And I notice so many female contemporaries and friends who are in the business who suffer from that. I think a lot of men struggle with that too, but I think it’s stronger with women because we’re used to not having a voice and for the room to be full of men.

Have there been any moments where you’ve felt that a particular creative venture hasn’t quite worked the way you’d planned? 

Always! I don’t think I’ve ever made a production and thought “job done”. I made a big decision with Romeo and Juliet about how much to cut, and I threw it on the stage in a bold way that failed. It was a big, brash, explosion of stuff and some of it wasn’t properly thought through, and that made me be a lot more rigorous about questioning certain decisions I make before I go into rehearsals. I try not to be afraid of failing because that will hold back any creativity. Everyone’s always afraid of making a fool of themselves and getting it wrong. Every single person who is involved in theatre goes into a rehearsal room wanting to make the best possible piece they can. Sometimes the stars are just not aligned and things just don’t quite work. If there was a recipe for how to make the perfect theatre, we’d all be making perfect theatre. It doesn’t happen easily. It’s hard work to get something working properly. I think we have to risk and have to be able to fail. The industry can be very unforgiving and I think we should accept and applaud people who make big mistakes. We’ve got to allow people to fail because it’s only through failing that we learn. So I will always have a very open rehearsal room where we make a lot of mistakes and get it wrong a lot of the time.

What do you think your productions have gained through the process of devising?

Everyone involved feels an enormous sense of ownership over the project and therefore the sense of connection with it is enormous which comes out in how they perform it. There’s nothing like feeling that we all made this together, that egalitarian approach allows everyone to have real agency in the room and when it works it’s brilliant.

How do you feel about the way Covid has impacted the theatre industry?

Although our profession has been hit mightily by Covid, we have had to have difficult conversations and reflect on our industry during this time. That has been a really positive thing, unpacking how the building blocks don’t make it a fair playing ground, not just for women but for BAME communities and people with disabilities. Some of the most interesting conversations I’ve had have been about why theatre is important. It has been a really useful thing to do, and in my own practice has made me question how I want to proceed. We’re in this liminal space on the threshold of this new reality, and if we hold onto the past that’s not going to help us either. We’re going into a new territory where anything can happen, but it has to involve a fairer space and a more equal space which really thinks about the community we’re making theatre with and for.

Image Credit: Manuel Harlan.

Dick Whittington: not quite the win the National was hoping for

There’s a guilty pleasure in watching a pantomime at the end of January. It’s like playing your Spotify Christmas playlist in the middle of July— you know you shouldn’t, but you can’t help but belt Mariah Carey while the rest of the world are outside having barbecues and enjoying the sun. So when the National Theatre announced that they’d be putting their socially-distanced first ever pantomime since 1983 up on their newly-launched National Theatre at Home service, I was intrigued.

It’s safe to say that the production is a mixed bag. The script (written by Jude Christian and Cariad Lloyd) is an updated revival of the 2018 Lyric Hammersmith version of Dick Whittington. The overall concept is to do away with the clichéd hallmarks of the genre. This version attempts to be the Hamilton of pantomimes, incorporating street dance, rap, pop ballads and frequent references to TikTok trends into an otherwise familiar tale. It is a love letter to London, putting the city’s bustling diversity and vibrancy centre stage. I did enjoy the elements of political satire that the production managed to include, such as the subtle jab at the Tory Government’s free school meals misfire. The mayor of London in this production (who for some reason is a pigeon) even flies in on a zip-wire, sporting a shaggy mop of hair that looked suspiciously similar to that of the current Prime Minister…

Yet I was left with the overwhelming impression that the script tries too hard to be up-to-date and relevant. Apart from a few racy double entendres and allusions to Netflix shows (“It’s like Emily in Paris all over again”), most of the comedy falls flat and the dialogue is mediocre at best. One particularly awful scene involved the villainess, Queen Rat, arriving on stage on a giant-sized evil Henry the Hoover. The wittiest one-liner the script could muster up was “man, hoovers really do suck”. The musical elements of the show provide a welcome relief—I particularly enjoyed the parodic version of Billie Eilish’s ‘Bad Guy’ to introduce the villain of the piece. At times the use of pop songs were overused to the extent that Dick Whittington began to feel more like a jukebox musical and less of a pantomime; a rendition of Dua Lipa’s ‘Don’t Start Now felt‘ a bit forced and did little to carry the plot, or indeed provide any sense of comic relief.

One thing, however, that cannot be faulted was the cast. I have rarely seen a cast with such energy and enthusiasm, and they single-handedly carried what was an otherwise very flat script. It must undoubtedly be difficult to perform a pantomime (which as a genre is particularly reliant on audience interaction) in the Olivier Theatre. It is after all the National’s biggest stage, and of course felt especially empty due to distancing requirements. Standouts include Dickie Beau’s gloriously filthy performance as a classic pantomime dame, while Melanie La Barrie stunned the audience with her stage-presence and singing abilities as the fairy-godmother-esque figure Beaux Belles. Lawrence Hodgson-Mullings again impressed us with his singing and dancing abilities but was perhaps not quite a charismatic enough lead to carry the show as Dick. Even just watching it on the screen, you could really get a sense of the camaraderie, both amongst the actors, and also in their relationship with the audience.

It also must be remembered that their run was cut short by the placement of London into tier three after their fourth preview performance. The actors would have had much more time to grow into their roles, and they would have had time to iron out the weaknesses in the script. It must have been hard to keep the morale going, given how aware they were that the curtain was to come crashing down at the point where the run felt like it was just beginning. Georgia Lowe’s set and costume design was another highlight of the production. The costumes felt like a blend between box of Quality Streets and a Tim Burton movie, while minimalist in-the-round set made use of a clock motif, with the hour hands subtly providing distancing guidelines for the actors. Indeed, the end of the production involved the love-interests hugging through plastic sheets—a comic reminder of the difficulties that the cast and crew must have collectively gone through to get this show on its feet.

I wonder if I would have enjoyed it more if I had been in the actual theatre itself. Much of what makes pantomimes enjoyable is the interaction between the stage and the audience—something that a filmed version at home, however well-shot simply cannot replicate. I had actually booked to see this production in person, so was sad not to be able to attend when restrictions changed, and we were placed into another national lockdown. The last play I saw pre-corona was actually Our Brilliant Friend in the Olivier itself, this time last year—and I for one can’t wait to be sitting back in that space watching another NT production as soon as restrictions ease.

Image Credit: The Other Richard.